Help & information    View the list of Transcripts

Thursday, February 12, 2009
CRA Meeting

The following represents an unedited version of
realtime captioning which should neither be relied
upon for complete accuracy nor used as a verbatim
The original of this file was produced in all capital
letters and any variation thereto may be a result of
third party edits and software compatibility issues.
Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the
proceedings may need to hire a court reporter.

09:04:30 >>GWEN MILLER: Good morning.
09:04:31 Good morning.
09:04:33 The Community Redevelopment Agency CRA will now come
09:04:36 to order.
09:04:37 The chair will yield to Mr. Charlie Miranda.
09:04:41 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you, Madam Chair.
09:04:43 I have the pleasure of introducing a young lady who
09:04:46 everyone knows.
09:04:47 She's done an outstanding job in various areas of the

09:04:50 city.
09:04:50 She's been a volunteer to many civic groups.
09:04:54 She was also a -- she did an excellent job, has been
09:05:04 very fair, and sometimes I everyone call her for
09:05:06 advice, not that I take it, but I call her for advice,
09:05:09 and she's been very forthright in giving the facts to
09:05:14 myself and other council members, and I would like to
09:05:16 introduce this morning Sue Lyons who is going to say
09:05:20 the prayer.
09:05:21 Please stand and remain standing for the pledge of
09:05:22 allegiance.
09:05:28 >> Dear heavenly father, thank you for this council
09:05:31 and the good work they do.
09:05:32 Please protect them and their families.
09:05:34 Thank you for the wonderful city we live in and those
09:05:38 who have worked so hard to make it a better place.
09:05:42 Please lift this burden of worry and stress from our
09:05:44 hearts and let us know that you will take care of our
09:05:48 needs, because we place our trust in you and your
09:05:51 word.
09:05:54 We cast all our cares on you.
09:05:56 This is a time of testing, and you have brought us

09:06:00 this far and will not abandon us.
09:06:02 Did you not abandon us in the wilderness, and we have
09:06:05 faith you will continue to lead us out of this
09:06:08 troubled time.
09:06:09 Help us to turn to you in our time of need, for you
09:06:13 are all powerful, and you care for us.
09:06:16 Give us the peace that transcends understanding and
09:06:20 remind us to put our trust in you.
09:06:23 Amen.
09:06:26 (Pledge of Allegiance)
09:06:43 >>GWEN MILLER: Roll call.
09:06:44 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Here.
09:06:48 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Here.
09:06:49 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: Here.
09:06:50 >>MARY MULHERN: Here.
09:06:52 >>GWEN MILLER: At this time.
09:06:54 Here.
09:06:55 At this time I turn it over to Mr. Mark Huey.
09:06:57 >>MARK HUEY: Economic development administrator.
09:07:01 Before we talk about the first agenda item, I wanted
09:07:06 to take a moment and provide a little clarification to
09:07:10 an article that was in the Tampa Tribune today.

09:07:14 The article concerned a routine matter before you this
09:07:18 morning concerning some adjustments to the budgets you
09:07:23 approved last fall.
09:07:27 What we determined in reviewing those budgets --
09:07:32 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Do you have a copy?
09:07:34 >>MARK HUEY: Excuse me?
09:07:35 Copy of the article?
09:07:36 I'm sorry, I don't.
09:07:37 But I'll explain to you what the article said.
09:07:40 >> Let me make some copies.
09:07:47 >>MARK HUEY: What occurred is when we used mill annal
09:07:50 rates to make the revenue projections in support of
09:07:54 the budgets, inadvertently the Hillsborough County
09:08:00 environmental protection program, that millage rate
09:08:02 was included in the millage rate, and as you are
09:08:06 aware, that is not in fact a source of TIF revenue.
09:08:10 That millage rate that taxpayers pay toward
09:08:14 preservation of public lands is not a revenue stream
09:08:18 that comes to the Community Redevelopment Agency.
09:08:21 So that was an accident that occurred.
09:08:24 That accident was discovered.
09:08:25 It was corrected.

09:08:26 When we billed the county, we billed the appropriate
09:08:29 amount, and the county appraised the appropriate
09:08:33 amount so the accounting adjustment before you today
09:08:35 is simply to correct that, to reduce the budgets by
09:08:39 the amount for each redevelopment area, that they were
09:08:44 inadvertently increased because of the accidental
09:08:46 inclusion of the ELAPP millage rate in the original
09:08:50 projections.
09:08:51 The original we provided some information that turned
09:08:54 out not to be accurate in the way it got communicated
09:09:00 in the paper and we apologize for that, and that
09:09:03 information speculated that it had to do with the
09:09:05 passage of the ELAPP program or not, and really that's
09:09:10 irrelevant to the calculation of TIF revenues because
09:09:13 that millage rate is not part of the overall
09:09:17 calculation of TIF revenues coming through the
09:09:21 redevelopment agency.
09:09:22 Any questions about that?
09:09:23 We apologize to the media and to the public for any
09:09:30 miscommunication that might have occurred in that.
09:09:31 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Just to clarify, it didn't affect
09:09:35 our budgeting, did it?

09:09:36 >>MARK HUEY: Yes, the adjustments before you today are
09:09:43 in effect to take in each of our CRAs to make the
09:09:49 adjustments associated with that inadvertent inclusion
09:09:54 of the ELAPP millage in our revenue projections last
09:09:57 year.
09:09:59 So again a mistake was made.
09:10:01 The result of it was we overprojected TIF revenues
09:10:05 slightly in each redevelopment area, and that mistake
09:10:09 was caught.
09:10:10 We have reduced in each CRA an amount to account for
09:10:16 that, and today's actions will make the CRA budget
09:10:22 consistent with the actual revenues billed and
09:10:26 collected from all of the taxing municipalities.
09:10:28 >> Next time we should be more optimistic about ELAPP.
09:10:32 >>> Well, again, ELAPP is not part of the millage, so
09:10:37 we weren't optimistic or not.
09:10:39 That's why it's unfortunate the information was shared
09:10:40 in that way.
09:10:41 It was, but I just want to correct the record.
09:10:45 ELAPP is not part of the millage that comes to the
09:10:48 TIF, and whether ELAPP passed or not had nothing to do
09:10:52 and should have had nothing to do with the way we

09:10:54 projected revenue.
09:10:55 That millage was included again as part of the
09:10:59 original revenue projections and today's actions
09:11:01 correct for that.
09:11:02 And that was an error on our part.
09:11:10 >>GWEN MILLER: Continue.
09:11:12 >>MARK HUEY: The next item that we have is we had a
09:11:15 very successful community meeting last month in Drew
09:11:19 Park.
09:11:21 Most of you were there.
09:11:22 We appreciate your attendance.
09:11:24 We had good attendance from the community.
09:11:26 We had a chance to hear from Louis Miller about the
09:11:30 progress on Cargo Road.
09:11:31 We had a chance to hear from HCC about their future
09:11:35 redevelopment plans, and from a number of folks in the
09:11:38 community.
09:11:39 So we again appreciate all of their participation in
09:11:44 the meeting, and HCC is a wonderful host.
09:11:49 The next meeting per your policy will occur in April.
09:11:52 At this point absent further direction from the board,
09:11:54 we would suggest that we have it in the Heights.

09:11:58 That is one of the redevelopment areas you have not
09:12:00 yet visited.
09:12:01 So if that's satisfactory, we would offer that up as
09:12:05 our next community meeting.
09:12:08 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Dingfelder.
09:12:10 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: We love all of our CRA districts.
09:12:14 I guess I would question, is there enough going on in
09:12:16 the Heights to warrant a meeting?
09:12:23 >> MARK HUEY: I think you will be pleased with what's
09:12:25 going on.
09:12:26 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Okay.
09:12:27 >>MARK HUEY: They are no different than any other CRA
09:12:30 district in the fact that the economy and the capital
09:12:34 market challenges are certainly damp evening private
09:12:37 sector activity, but at Heights we are moving forward.
09:12:42 >> Fair enough, thank you.
09:12:43 >>> And I think they'll update you on the
09:12:46 infrastructure planning.
09:12:46 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Okay.
09:12:51 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank you.
09:12:52 >>> We will plan on that and work it with your
09:12:54 calendars to find a God date in April to do that.

09:12:59 The next item on the agenda are monthly reports.
09:13:11 If I had to pick a top thing certainly the opening of
09:13:13 the history center was a milestone that it's been
09:13:16 decades in the making, and successfully open to rave
09:13:21 reviews, and our downtown has a new attraction that we
09:13:24 can all be proud of.
09:13:29 Right after that I think the Super Bowl was quite an
09:13:32 event for our city, and for our redevelopment areas,
09:13:35 particularly Ybor City, Channelside and downtown.
09:13:38 We had a chance to be showcase the history center, the
09:13:43 convention center, the activities in Ybor City, and of
09:13:46 course a great historic neighborhood of Ybor City.
09:13:50 Great business all around, and very successful in that
09:13:53 regard.
09:13:54 We had a lot to show off, didn't we, as the fruits of
09:13:57 our redevelopment efforts since the last Super Bowl?
09:14:03 We have had residents moving into the elements in
09:14:05 downtown, about 25 residents so far, living in the new
09:14:09 element high-rise.
09:14:10 In Ybor we had two new restaurants open.
09:14:13 We are beginning to work with IKEA in an advertisings
09:14:18 of their opening to make sure that we can take

09:14:20 advantage of the very significant customer traffic
09:14:25 that they will bring into the area.
09:14:29 Channel District, we continue to make progress on the
09:14:31 possibility of acquiring land for pocket parks, stage
09:14:36 works has committed to moving forward with their
09:14:38 interior construction, and Drew Park, we of course had
09:14:42 our community meeting.
09:14:44 We are on track to close on our first land acquisition
09:14:48 in Drew Park this month in the Cargo Road progress is
09:14:53 ahead of schedule, and office 2009, hopefully, we will
09:14:58 all be at a ribbon cutting for that.
09:15:00 East Tampa, the Martin Luther King retention project
09:15:02 continues, has started construction.
09:15:06 We are excited about that.
09:15:07 That will be comparable to the Fairoaks project that
09:15:14 claimed that stormwater feature for public park.
09:15:19 The hotel continues under renovation.
09:15:22 Significantly, the folks from Sarasota from the
09:15:25 Newtown CRA came to visit East Tampa.
09:15:28 You might recall we hosted the statewide conference of
09:15:32 the Florida redevelopment association a few months
09:15:35 ago.

09:15:37 Folks from Sarasota learned about what we were doing
09:15:39 in East Tampa and made a special trip including their
09:15:43 mayor coming to visit what we are doing in East Tampa,
09:15:46 and his team did a great job touring them around.
09:15:51 I think board member Saul-Sena had a chance to visit.
09:15:53 We appreciate that.
09:15:56 It's nice to see our efforts recognized by other
09:15:59 communities.
09:16:00 Heights, the Beck's office building continues to stay
09:16:02 on track to start construction.
09:16:04 And in Central Park, we have our development team
09:16:07 there, the Housing Authority and Bank of America
09:16:12 looking forward to putting in tax credit applications
09:16:19 in the upcoming cycle.
09:16:20 Those are some highlights.
09:16:22 I would be glad to answer any questions you might
09:16:23 have.
09:16:26 >>GWEN MILLER: Ms. Saul-Sena.
09:16:27 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: A couple of questions.
09:16:30 In the goals for January, it says completed is a scope
09:16:35 of work for a process for administering the CRA facade
09:16:47 grant so people can borrow money to improve the

09:16:49 facade.
09:16:51 >>> Well, what the scope of work refers to, remember,
09:16:54 we don't have the capacity internally within the city
09:16:58 to manage that program, so the scope of works relates
09:17:02 to an RFP that we are planning to make available to
09:17:07 identify an administrative partner.
09:17:10 And so that's the scope of work that's referred to.
09:17:12 In terms of when we hope to be able to actually
09:17:15 activate that program, I think it will be in June.
09:17:18 So what we are doing is continuing to report to you
09:17:21 progress, the time line that we outline when you
09:17:25 approve the project, aside grant program.
09:17:29 >> Have we received a copy of the RFP?
09:17:32 >>> No, but we'll be glad to get you that.
09:17:34 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: What sort of individual or entity
09:17:37 are you looking for, when we say we are looking for to
09:17:42 administer it?
09:17:44 >>> We need an entity primarily that will help with
09:17:47 the administrative side.
09:17:52 As applications are received we will primarily be the
09:17:54 marketers of the program, but as applications are
09:17:56 received, and processed, that they can assist with

09:17:59 underwriting, and the whole administrative process of
09:18:03 up to an award, and that in addition to that, there's
09:18:07 a process, because these are in a sense loans, a draw
09:18:14 process that will occur.
09:18:15 So this entity would also help us in administering a
09:18:18 draw process to make sure draws are made consistent
09:18:21 with the agreement that we have with an eventual
09:18:26 awardee.
09:18:26 There's two main pieces.
09:18:28 Would this be like a bank or credit union?
09:18:30 >> Yes.
09:18:31 We would expect to the be a financial institution that
09:18:32 is used to doing loan administration.
09:18:37 >> And how much money do we anticipate being in the
09:18:39 loan program and how much money do we anticipate
09:18:41 paying someone to add mer it?
09:18:46 >>> Between three CRAs we expect to have about 1.3
09:18:51 million.
09:18:51 The largest is in East Tampa which is about $800,000.
09:18:55 The administrative costs, and I'll report to you on
09:18:59 the project, we reported to you an estimate.
09:19:01 Until we go through this RFP process.

09:19:03 But I believe, Mike, it was --
09:19:07 >> About 9 to 14%.
09:19:09 >> We expect to the come in around 9 to 14%.
09:19:12 Again, we'll be glad to come back and report to you,
09:19:15 once we do in fact have an administrator on board how
09:19:17 that will work.
09:19:18 >> And who will be making the selection?
09:19:21 >>> It will occur to the normal city procurement
09:19:24 process.
09:19:26 And we'll have as part of that representations from
09:19:32 the involved CRAs but we will be using the normal
09:19:35 city procurement process as we do for all.
09:19:38 >> We have been talking about trying to get local
09:19:39 businesses -- you know, we recognize if you spend
09:19:43 money locally it stays in Tampa, not where it's needed
09:19:47 to stay.
09:19:49 Will there be any weighting given to local entity
09:19:53 rather than an out-of-town entity?
09:19:57 >>> Only as consistent with the current policy and
09:19:59 practices of the city.
09:20:02 So there's nothing being done differently.
09:20:05 >> There's nothing being done additionally?

09:20:07 >>> No.
09:20:08 >> This is something you might not have been tuned in
09:20:11 because it's not a CRA board but as a council board
09:20:14 wanting to do everything we can to help local
09:20:16 businesses.
09:20:17 The legal department is working on it but as you know
09:20:20 they haven't come back to us yet with a specific
09:20:23 proposal.
09:20:23 But we also haven't gone out to this RFP yet.
09:20:26 >>> Well, what I can share with you is I cannot
09:20:30 imagine a scenario in which a local company would not
09:20:33 be awarded this.
09:20:39 Because of the work involved and the fact that so much
09:20:41 of is it going to be doing -- whether it's evaluating
09:20:46 RFP responses or administering draw requests, and
09:20:50 visiting sites, it would be very expensive for an
09:20:54 out-of-town entity to be able to do that.
09:20:56 So I hate to speculate, but I can just offer you that
09:21:01 up as an observation.
09:21:03 I really can't see how an out-of-town firm would be
09:21:06 economically competitive with local firms in competing
09:21:10 for this type of work.

09:21:11 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Please share with us what you have
09:21:15 written up.
09:21:16 Thank you.
09:21:20 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you for bringing up that, Linda.
09:21:22 I'm curious why we have to actually have someone add
09:21:32 mer this because you are the administration for our
09:21:34 CRA district and I know the city does have
09:21:36 relationships with banks, and I know that we do have
09:21:40 some loan programs, especially growth management,
09:21:44 development services, and I question whether that's a
09:21:50 good use of the money.
09:21:52 I'd rather see the money go to a business to do the
09:21:54 facade.
09:21:55 But, you know, if we really feel that we need someone
09:22:01 to administer this program, I think Linda's point
09:22:10 about local businesses is very important, knot not
09:22:13 just because we want to support local businesses,
09:22:15 which I know everybody has been talking about it since
09:22:19 I started sitting here, but that the major banks are
09:22:24 actually failing, and the only banks that are in any
09:22:27 kind of decent shape right now are local, the small
09:22:31 banks, the local banks, and the credit unions.

09:22:34 So if we are going to award this to anybody, I think
09:22:37 that it only makes sense to do that, absolutely do it
09:22:42 with a local company, and, you know, all the big banks
09:22:46 have branches here, so it's not as if we are talking
09:22:48 about going out of town.
09:22:51 It's possible you could give it to Bank of America or
09:22:54 fifth third or one of these big banks that, you know,
09:23:00 invested all our money unwisely when it could be going
09:23:03 to a local credit union or small bank or something,
09:23:10 but I really question whether we need to spend this
09:23:14 CRA money on administration when we actually have
09:23:17 administration staff to do it.
09:23:24 >>> We wrote to you a memorandum that would discuss at
09:23:29 length at this board, and at that time this issue was
09:23:33 debated and we provided you information about the work
09:23:38 that we have done to see if it could be done
09:23:40 internally and why it couldn't be done.
09:23:42 That was certainly our preference, but we simply don't
09:23:45 have the staffing resources internally to do it.
09:23:48 So we are on track to implement it in the fashion that
09:23:51 you have approved.
09:23:52 I would be happy to re-send to you all of the backup

09:23:55 documentation that you approved previously on this,
09:23:59 and so you could familiarize yourself with the
09:24:03 discussion that we had and the information that we
09:24:04 provided you.
09:24:05 >>MARY MULHERN: I would like to see that.
09:24:07 I also think that this is, you know, really a bigger
09:24:11 discussion now because we did -- everything that we
09:24:13 have approved over the last three or four years were
09:24:16 based on a lot of assumptions about what was going to
09:24:20 happen with the market.
09:24:25 Needless to say things haven't gone as -- I think it's
09:24:30 well worth it for us to look at -- revisit how we are
09:24:34 spending a lot of this money to make sure we are
09:24:37 getting the most we can out of it.
09:24:44 >>GWEN MILLER: Did you have your hand up, Mr. Miranda?
09:24:46 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: No, I am going to wait last.
09:24:53 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Good morning, mark.
09:24:54 Thank you.
09:24:57 I would like to ask Bob a couple of questions about
09:25:02 Channelside in the January report.
09:25:06 >>> Bob McDonaugh, urban development.
09:25:09 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I don't know if you have your page

09:25:14 with you.
09:25:14 I'm sure you know this by heart.
09:25:16 But I just wanted to walk up a couple of these because
09:25:19 these are things that you have been talking to this
09:25:22 board about for a couple of months.
09:25:26 It says work with City of Tampa contract to finish
09:25:29 negotiating Wilson Miller contract amendment.
09:25:32 What are we changing with Wilson Miller?
09:25:34 >>> Well, there's two things.
09:25:36 One is it's the approval of the next scope of work,
09:25:39 which is the continuation of the construction
09:25:41 documents.
09:25:43 But there was also approximately $50,000 going to be
09:25:48 added to this leg of the contract, because as you are
09:25:50 aware, we are going through federal funding, and one
09:25:55 of the caveats of federal funding is that you are in a
09:25:58 position to actually build these improvements.
09:26:00 So one of the two things we need to do for stormwater
09:26:03 in the Channel District is to have two retention
09:26:06 areas, two retention basins, and one is scheduled or
09:26:09 planned for under McKay and the other is scheduled
09:26:13 or planned under York street, and we are working with

09:26:15 the Port Authority because part of that property is
09:26:17 owned by them.
09:26:18 And so that would be really the addition of the York
09:26:21 street basin which would have been done in the future,
09:26:25 is really the only change to what we are looking at
09:26:27 right now, to position ours that is if federal funds
09:26:29 are available, that we can say, yes, we have the
09:26:32 engineering in place to do these improvements.
09:26:34 >> So when you say federal funds you are talking about
09:26:37 the stimulus money?
09:26:38 >>> Correct.
09:26:38 >> And then working up a list, community parks, you
09:26:41 have a couple of items there.
09:26:42 You said working with the community to locate,
09:26:46 possibly locate a pocket park, I guess, some letters
09:26:50 of interest to land owners to discuss possible
09:26:52 acquisition of parks, how are we doing on the little
09:26:55 pocket park?
09:26:56 >>> I actually have three land owners who have agreed
09:26:59 to a pricing structure.
09:27:02 I have had discussion was my board, and my plan is in
09:27:06 the next newsletter which should go out in the next

09:27:09 month to invite residents to a meeting where we can
09:27:11 talk about exactly what it is they would like to see
09:27:14 in their parks.
09:27:14 And it's interesting because we have a variety of
09:27:17 interests.
09:27:19 I have folks who like to see art work.
09:27:21 I have one group that would like to see children's
09:27:23 exercise equipment.
09:27:24 And then everybody wants something for their dog.
09:27:27 So before I get too far down the road, I want to
09:27:31 involve the community and make sure that everybody is
09:27:32 consistent with what we are talking about.
09:27:34 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Great.
09:27:36 And then the last item I was curious about related to
09:27:43 the parking garage which in front of us in some
09:27:48 context of zoning or something awhile back.
09:27:50 And we had assurances, at least verbal from the Port
09:27:56 Authority that they would, you know, try and activate
09:28:00 the front of the garage on the Main Street there,
09:28:04 Channelside Boulevard.
09:28:05 >>> Channelside Drive, yes.
09:28:09 >> And perhaps make it a little more pedestrian

09:28:14 friendly than their current garage.
09:28:18 Any word on that?
09:28:19 >>> Yes, they will be coming in front of this group to
09:28:23 discuss their garage.
09:28:24 But they did several things.
09:28:26 I think they had their meetings open to the public.
09:28:29 They had me participate in the selection of a
09:28:33 contractor, and engineer and design group, and they
09:28:36 did several things.
09:28:37 One of the big concerns that some of the residents in
09:28:40 the Channel District had were view corridors, and it's
09:28:44 their existing garage.
09:28:45 If the garage was built to be level with their
09:28:48 existing garage it could impact or negatively impact
09:28:50 the view corridors from The Towers of Channelside.
09:28:53 So what they agreed to do was actually lower it by a
09:28:56 floor.
09:28:56 And they accomplished keeping the same number of cars
09:29:01 by cantilevering it over the sidewalks.
09:29:04 So did it two things.
09:29:05 One thing is that it adds the ability to provide shade
09:29:12 and keeping people out of the elements when they are

09:29:13 walking on the sidewalks.
09:29:15 And secondly it gives them the opportunity to light
09:29:17 that area at night.
09:29:19 And so the pedestrians would be illuminated.
09:29:22 They also have punchouts in there which would support
09:29:27 vegetation.
09:29:28 The exterior skin of it was somewhat reflective of the
09:29:34 shops at Channelside across the street.
09:29:36 So it was a departure from the existing garage.
09:29:39 The original garage was built when there was only the
09:29:42 aquarium there, and so the colors and designs, which
09:29:46 was done by HLK, were reflective of the aquarium.
09:29:49 So everything has changed now and we have a lot of new
09:29:52 other structures.
09:29:52 And so what the engineers and architects did was
09:29:57 basically, because that building is off about 60
09:30:00 degrees it almost like two separate structures, and
09:30:02 what they have done is put design elements in there
09:30:05 that are reflective of the buildings that are there
09:30:07 now.
09:30:07 That's the long answer to your question but the answer
09:30:10 is yes.

09:30:10 >> We appreciate it because we haven't had an update
09:30:13 since they were here awhile back.
09:30:14 How about any shops or storefronts on the first floor?
09:30:18 >>> Not that I'm aware of, and I think they are still
09:30:21 in the workout stage with that.
09:30:23 They have had several meetings with Wilson Stair again
09:30:27 to make sure that the design is something compatible
09:30:29 with the city.
09:30:32 They have got a ways to go.
09:30:33 Basically what they have done is recently in the last
09:30:35 two or three weeks, with the design build contract,
09:30:39 and from there they have a concept, and they have to
09:30:41 take the concept to fruition.
09:30:44 >> I'm glad at least they are going to do the covered
09:30:48 walk.
09:30:48 >>> And lowering the building also, I think there was
09:30:52 a collective sigh of relief from the people that live
09:30:56 in the towers of Channelside.
09:30:58 >>MARY MULHERN: I just have one question and I don't
09:31:02 know if you feel comfortable sharing this with us, but
09:31:04 three properties you are looking at for the pocket
09:31:06 park, where are they?

09:31:09 Can you give us an idea?
09:31:11 >>> Three of them actually are within the central core
09:31:15 of the Channel District.
09:31:16 Again, my plan -- and I think it supported by my board
09:31:19 and the residents -- is not to have a park but a
09:31:22 series of parks.
09:31:23 And so the idea, the philosophy, the first one would
09:31:28 be central to the district, and then perhaps moving
09:31:30 north and south to accommodate all of the residents.
09:31:34 But it's kind of in the middle.
09:31:35 So basically it would be a is that righter walking
09:31:37 distance to as many residents as I could possibly
09:31:40 accommodate.
09:31:42 >>MARY MULHERN: So Channelside goes --
09:31:46 >>> North-south.
09:31:47 >> So on the south side.
09:31:49 >>> Actually in the center, probably between 11th
09:31:52 and 12th.
09:31:53 >> Okay.
09:31:54 >>> And south of Kennedy and north of Cumberland.
09:31:57 >> So none of them are going to be on the channel?
09:32:00 >>> Not yet, no. And again, this is a work in

09:32:03 progress.
09:32:04 And it will be my hope to have several parks, because
09:32:09 it will break up the monotony of lots of tall
09:32:13 buildings.
09:32:14 And I think it will accommodate more of the people who
09:32:17 live there.
09:32:17 And what will be neat is that we can have a different
09:32:20 characters in each park so it will accommodate
09:32:23 different people in different ways.
09:32:25 >> I think that's great.
09:32:26 That's what we have been hearing from residents.
09:32:27 That's what they want.
09:32:28 >>> We have been listening.
09:32:30 >> The parks that are right there.
09:32:31 >>> Yeah.
09:32:32 >> Thanks.
09:32:33 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Miranda.
09:32:34 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I just want to say thank you for
09:32:36 your diligent work that you have done, not only this
09:32:39 project but throughout the years.
09:32:42 And the only reservation I have is for every action,
09:32:45 there's always a reaction.

09:32:46 And if we are going to look to the local on
09:32:50 everything, what does that mean when they go find work
09:32:53 somewhere else?
09:32:54 That they are excluded?
09:32:56 That another city like Gainesville or St. Petersburg
09:32:59 or Orlando or Mobile, Alabama is going to tell them,
09:33:03 go back to where you came from, stay local?
09:33:05 That's all.
09:33:10 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Dingfelder.
09:33:14 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Mark, can I ask Ed about East
09:33:22 Tampa?
09:33:23 >>> Ed Johnson, development manager, East Tampa.
09:33:27 >> In your goals for the upcoming months in parks it
09:33:31 speaks to the rolling out of the strategic action
09:33:33 plan.
09:33:33 I know you have been working I guess with the
09:33:35 consultant to develop that comprehensive document in
09:33:40 preparing it for community roll-out.
09:33:45 Give us a little update on that, and also are you
09:33:50 going to roll it out to this board as well?
09:33:52 >>> Yes.
09:33:53 Our plan is, I think we talked a little bit about this

09:33:56 a couple past meetings, is to actually create an
09:33:59 executive summary.
09:34:01 We'll share that executive summary of the plan first,
09:34:04 get the buy-in from everyone on the executive
09:34:07 summaries, where we are going within the plan, and
09:34:09 then roll the plan out at a subsequent time.
09:34:13 We hope to have the executive summary wrapped up here
09:34:16 in the next couple of weeks.
09:34:18 Of course, a lot of our actions or solutions are, you
09:34:23 know, weighted down with what's happening in the
09:34:25 economy, as we talked about, we plan to bring about
09:34:30 two actual funding scenarios, one without TIF back
09:34:37 financing, and because of what's going on in the
09:34:39 market, it's wreaking some havoc on our projections
09:34:45 right now.
09:34:46 So we'll kind of retool and get it updated the best we
09:34:50 can, and then we'll come to you and the community with
09:34:53 than the executive summary and have some further
09:34:56 dialogue and get some more additional community input
09:34:58 as to what the objectives are.
09:34:59 >> Yesterday I was at a meeting, Pat Bean from the
09:35:04 county was there giving that update.

09:35:09 Tom and I were there.
09:35:11 What were the numbers she gave, Tom, the property
09:35:13 appraiser is projecting something in the teens?
09:35:18 >> Eleven?
09:35:20 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: No, 15 or 17% drop in potential
09:35:24 appraised values across the county as an average, I
09:35:27 guess.
09:35:29 So I guess that will affect you and all government
09:35:33 agencies.
09:35:33 >>> That's correct.
09:35:35 And I believe Mr. Huey is scheduling a meeting with
09:35:39 the property appraiser's office to actually sit down
09:35:43 and discuss, you know, exactly where those projections
09:35:47 are realistically before we actually wrap up the final
09:35:51 piece that we need to put into our projections for the
09:35:53 executive summary and our plans.
09:35:55 So, yes, I think we wanted to wait until he had that
09:35:58 conversation and to see exactly where we were going to
09:36:03 go with these numbers.
09:36:04 >> Do you guys expect East Tampa to be hit harder than
09:36:07 most in terms of those reductions?
09:36:10 >>> Well, I believe so, because we have had the

09:36:12 largest growth over the last several years, so it
09:36:14 would just be common sense, I think, that it will take
09:36:18 the largest hit.
09:36:19 But in reality sense, when you think about it, going
09:36:25 from $6 million to $5 million, $5 million we can still
09:36:29 do a lot with.
09:36:30 So, yes, we will have less revenue, but we will still
09:36:33 have revenue to be able to conduct redevelopment
09:36:36 activity in East Tampa.
09:36:37 >> We appreciate your optimism.
09:36:40 Thank you.
09:36:40 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
09:36:43 I think that I kind of differ with these assumptions
09:36:48 about the 15%, because when you look at the map there,
09:36:52 was a map of Hillsborough County.
09:36:54 Of course this seemed like years ago because it was
09:36:56 about maybe three weeks or month ago.
09:36:59 That showed by neighborhood, and it was all of
09:37:03 Hillsborough County.
09:37:04 The areas that had depreciated the most.
09:37:08 And I know because my neighborhood happened to be in
09:37:11 the 29%, one which was the highest one at that point.

09:37:16 Probably things have gone down more.
09:37:18 But I think this is the silver lining.
09:37:21 I think that in the community redevelopment area,
09:37:24 things were a little more stable, because they didn't
09:37:26 go up as much over the housing boom.
09:37:29 Am I right about that?
09:37:33 >>> Yes, and we have been supported by a lot of new
09:37:35 construction in many our CRA areas, which again should
09:37:38 provide some resiliency to the steep drop.
09:37:42 But as Ahmed reported this information that you heard
09:37:47 the other day, we heard it as well and it really has a
09:37:49 dramatic impact on our East Tampa strategic action
09:37:52 plan, as far as the recommendations that we were
09:37:54 bringing forward.
09:37:55 So it has caused as Ed suggested to really take a step
09:38:00 back, and to get a little bit more information from
09:38:03 the assessor's office to support the planning work
09:38:06 that we are doing there.
09:38:07 So we appreciate your patience on that.
09:38:09 The good news is that East Tampa is moving forward
09:38:12 even without a plan.
09:38:14 We have got as you know lots of good things going.

09:38:16 But we are anxious to get that plan done, and this has
09:38:20 just been the latest of a number of unexpected twists
09:38:24 in our development of strategic plan for East Tampa.
09:38:28 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I want to thank you so much, Mr.
09:38:33 Huey, for these monthly reports.
09:38:35 It is truly helpful to see all of the activities that
09:38:38 are going on, because prior to this, we didn't have
09:38:43 this level of information and it's really a helpful
09:38:46 thing.
09:38:46 I wanted to specifically ask about the downtown loan
09:38:50 program for the repair of historic buildings.
09:38:53 That's completed, correct?
09:38:54 It says completed.
09:38:55 >>MARK HUEY: The program is designed -- do you want to
09:39:00 give an update?
09:39:02 Programmatically it's designed and in place.
09:39:04 >> What I want to do is let people know how they can
09:39:06 begin to apply.
09:39:07 >>> All they need to speak with me, the program with
09:39:12 Dennis, and it's basically set along the same lines as
09:39:15 the interstate program, and I do have a last step that
09:39:18 I have to take the documents against the legal

09:39:21 department, but the money has been set aside.
09:39:23 I have the forms.
09:39:25 We have a pretty good idea of how the program will
09:39:27 work.
09:39:27 And I've already met with Janett about the program.
09:39:32 I'm on it.
09:39:33 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Good, good.
09:39:36 So by March you can share with us, you know, how
09:39:38 people are applying and what the time frame is.
09:39:41 Do you have like --
09:39:42 >>> You know what?
09:39:43 Dennis has a program where they have specific
09:39:47 deadlines.
09:39:48 I don't have as many properties in my area.
09:39:51 I don't think that will be necessary.
09:39:53 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: That's great.
09:39:55 >>> I would like to open it to all times and be as
09:39:59 flexible as possible.
09:40:00 So I don't think -- again, Dennis project covers lots
09:40:06 and lots of areas.
09:40:07 My specific CRA I don't think I will have as many
09:40:10 applicants.

09:40:10 Because of that I could be a little more flexible.
09:40:12 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: That's great.
09:40:14 One other quick question. There was some God news
09:40:16 here about the activating storefronts.
09:40:19 >>> Yes.
09:40:20 >> Can you share with us?
09:40:22 >>> We have two different things.
09:40:24 One we are working with the Tampa downtown
09:40:26 partnership, which is putting a for lack of a better
09:40:32 term shrink wrap on windows of vacant buildings, and
09:40:37 it's not just downtown, it's also Channel District,
09:40:41 and we are talking about Ybor as well, and the second
09:40:43 part of that is that I ran the program during Lights
09:40:51 on Tampa and I had a fair amount of people that
09:40:53 enjoyed it and for not a great amount of money I can
09:40:56 produce the same kind of thing 365 days out of the
09:40:58 year, involving people in the arts community and Ybor
09:41:01 and downtown and the university, and talk to landlords
09:41:06 with some of these buildings that are not activated
09:41:08 and put a projector in there and we can change what's
09:41:11 shown on a monthly basis and it can be informational,
09:41:14 it can be art, and at night, because we have some

09:41:17 corridors that don't have a lot of activity, they are
09:41:20 dark.
09:41:20 One of the things I have been working in my CRA
09:41:24 districts is adding light levels so people are more
09:41:28 comfortable walking, make it more pedestrian friendly
09:41:31 but by putting these displays in windows I think it
09:41:35 improves the comfort level and makes it more
09:41:37 interesting.
09:41:38 And these really in line with the recommendations made
09:41:43 in the art on the arts and how we need to activate
09:41:45 these windows.
09:41:46 So that's great.
09:41:46 >>> We had a meeting this week, and one of the things
09:41:51 that we have been somewhat hamstrung about is it's
09:41:54 called the Channel District arts program.
09:41:56 And our informal working group, prefer to call it the
09:42:01 in-town lights, because it is downtown, and it is Hyde
09:42:04 Park, and it is the Channel District, and it is Ybor,
09:42:07 and we want a sense of inclusion, where people don't
09:42:11 feel like they are going to be left out.
09:42:13 And so instead of call it Channel District arts plan,
09:42:16 we are calling it, at least among ourselves, to get

09:42:21 more people excited about it and involved in it.
09:42:24 >> If we need to officially as a CRA board change the
09:42:27 name we are happy to do that because we need everybody
09:42:29 to be engaged.
09:42:30 That's great.
09:42:30 >>MARY MULHERN: On that subject, I know that there's
09:42:38 an arts group in Ybor City that really wanted to
09:42:41 become a part of that, and I think before we, you
09:42:43 know, start always rebranding things and naming them,
09:42:49 but, yeah, informally you are working with a different
09:42:54 arm.
09:42:54 >>> At this point, attend all of these meetings, and
09:42:58 so we have already extended an olive branch because
09:43:01 the synergy -- we look at it as separate areas.
09:43:04 Nobody outside of our community looks at it as
09:43:07 separate areas.
09:43:07 They see it as one geographic area.
09:43:10 We are connected by a trolley, and it's within walking
09:43:15 distance.
09:43:15 So to have these imaginary lines really isn't helpful
09:43:20 for the process.
09:43:22 >>THOMAS SCOTT: A couple observations.

09:43:24 One is, Councilwoman Saul-Sena mentioned the issue of
09:43:29 the reports and how much more engaged we are, and I
09:43:34 want to point out that part of that is because going
09:43:37 back two years now, that this board decided to be more
09:43:41 involved and more engaged, so much so that you no
09:43:46 longer have a 30 minute prior to but you have a day
09:43:49 set aside for these meetings and that lends itself to
09:43:51 get reports in and be more engaged, more involved, so
09:43:54 I think for my perspective the board deserves a lot of
09:43:59 recognition and credit for what you have done, and the
09:44:02 importance of these CRAs in Tampa, and then staff
09:44:06 moving forward and bringing us the information and the
09:44:08 reports as well.
09:44:10 So I just wanted to highlight that.
09:44:12 Secondly, I want to say in terms of the downturn in
09:44:17 the economy, and the evaluation of the property going
09:44:21 down, also there's another silver lining in that, and
09:44:26 that is that the cost of doing business is cheaper as
09:44:28 well, that you should be able to move forward and be
09:44:31 able to get a lot more done.
09:44:34 The cost, the price is going down which helps
09:44:39 significantly East Tampa.

09:44:40 So I would hope as we move forward, Mr. Johnson, that
09:44:45 we can expeditiously move those plans forward as fast
09:44:50 as possible, because now is the time that you want to
09:44:53 be doing business because the rates are much better.
09:44:57 The last thing I want to say is in terms of Central
09:44:59 Park, I'm aware that the mayor did include such a park
09:45:04 in the stimulus package.
09:45:05 Also I had a conversation with Mr. Ryan, I have a
09:45:08 meeting set with him to talk about such a park.
09:45:11 It is seemingly that we may be everything to go there.
09:45:16 Do you want to speak to that?
09:45:17 But I want to request that we have an update on
09:45:21 Central Park, and I am going to be meeting sometime
09:45:24 this month to talk about where we are, but apparently
09:45:27 we have some good news in regards to Central Park and
09:45:32 what is taking place.
09:45:33 So I think it's good for this board to have an update
09:45:36 on Central Park, and --
09:45:41 >>MARK HUEY: We would be glad to schedule that, next
09:45:43 March.
09:45:46 >>THOMAS SCOTT: At the March meeting.
09:45:48 Get us up to speed on what's taking place there.

09:45:51 >>GWEN MILLER: Now we go to item number 3.
09:45:56 Evangeline best, chair of the East Tampa CRA.
09:46:05 >>> Good morning.
09:46:08 Just bear with me.
09:46:11 I'm a little nervous about doing this.
09:46:14 And it's a very special moment for me, because as
09:46:21 chairman of East Tampa, I take a lot of pride in what
09:46:26 happens in East Tampa.
09:46:27 I was born, reared, educated, spent 35 years as a
09:46:33 social worker in East Tampa, been very active in the
09:46:36 community.
09:46:36 And to stand here today representing East Tampa means
09:46:39 a lot to me.
09:46:41 Thank you.
09:46:48 I would like to thank you for the opportunity to come
09:46:50 before you to talk about East Tampa.
09:46:53 East Tampa is a very special area.
09:46:56 We have a lot of pride.
09:46:57 We have a lot of history.
09:47:02 Sometimes it's not validated but it is something that
09:47:04 those of us that have lived in East Tampa, we hold
09:47:08 dear to our hearts.

09:47:11 I would also like to give respect and pause to the
09:47:18 formal chairman Sam Kinsey and Tony Watts who was the
09:47:24 vice chair.
09:47:25 They laid a great foundation for this organization.
09:47:32 They laid the foundation for the new advisory board
09:47:37 that we could just start stepping stones and going
09:47:40 higher.
09:47:41 A lot of things were put in place, so I put my hat off
09:47:45 to Sam and to Tony, former board members, all the
09:47:50 membership.
09:47:50 And I would like to add that there are four of us
09:47:53 those on the current advisory board member that was a
09:47:57 part of the past.
09:47:58 So Carol Marshall, Maxine Woodside, Robert Blent and
09:48:10 myself, we see ourselves more as historians and we do
09:48:13 the connectiveness and we bring the group back. If we
09:48:17 have approved something in the past, we must go
09:48:19 forward on it.
09:48:20 So we bring that to the table.
09:48:24 I would also like to give special thanks to the city
09:48:29 staff, Ed Johnson, and his staff, Sidney Tucelli,
09:48:35 Laura Austin and Michelle van Long for their help.

09:48:41 They have been very patient with me.
09:48:43 They have allowed me to learn a lot, to ask a lot of
09:48:47 questions, to come there a lot and just say I need
09:48:55 more information, I want to know am I really doing the
09:48:58 right thing?
09:48:59 I think they are glad I don't have to meet with them
09:49:06 individually, I meet with them on a monthly basis so
09:49:10 that's for Ed Johnson's office and myself.
09:49:13 I would just like to share with you, I'm going to be
09:49:15 speaking to the exact comments that came from our last
09:49:20 January meeting where each of the advisory board
09:49:24 members gave what they said was the goals that they
09:49:29 accomplished this past year.
09:49:33 Starting with Denise James McKay, who is in charge
09:49:38 of aesthetic and beautification.
09:49:41 One of the things that their committee has
09:49:44 successfully done, which is going to put some
09:49:48 continuity and get us so we don't just act out of
09:49:52 emotions, in my opinion.
09:49:53 We get a lot of information about approve this,
09:49:56 approve that, do you want your name on this, do you
09:49:59 want to be a part of this?

09:50:01 Well, they set up a criteria that we would have to
09:50:05 look at before we approve anything about naming a
09:50:11 building, who gets what, in East Tampa.
09:50:14 So that to us puts us way down the road in terms of
09:50:19 not just doing, because we know somebody.
09:50:23 The next thing in her committee that they have done,
09:50:26 and that some of you were in attendance, I remember
09:50:30 seeing Gwen at our Christmas lighting in December.
09:50:38 It is the first time this ever happened in East Tampa.
09:50:41 We call it the East Tampa style.
09:50:44 That means that everybody and his mama could come
09:50:46 there, and we had parents, we had children, we had
09:50:52 art, most of the schools, and we have 17 schools in
09:50:55 East Tampa.
09:50:56 Most of the schools were present, participated on the
09:50:58 program, and we had the parents everyone that was not
09:51:01 from East Tampa, that transported their children over,
09:51:05 and were there in fellowship with us.
09:51:08 We billed that as being more than over 300-plus
09:51:12 persons, and everyone though the media said more, we
09:51:14 just know that we had a good time together.
09:51:18 The other thing that happened there was that we were

09:51:21 blessed by UCAP who is doing the pipelines in East
09:51:26 Tampa to donate 96 bicycles to East Tampa.
09:51:32 And we went to the school system to get that done in
09:51:35 terms of setting up our unified criteria for the
09:51:39 children to qualify.
09:51:41 We had such an overflow, and they brought us a little
09:51:44 bit more, we ended up being able to call on all our
09:51:48 neighborhoods, and our neighborhoods were able to
09:51:50 select a resident and their families to give them a
09:51:55 bicycle and to give them a $60 food basket for
09:51:59 Christmas.
09:52:00 We were very proud of that.
09:52:02 Moving along, in terms of Ernest coney who is the
09:52:08 economic development.
09:52:09 I heard comments this morning about the business
09:52:13 facade.
09:52:15 Ours in East Tampa is moving along also.
09:52:18 There was a good discussion at our meeting on last
09:52:21 Tuesday that more people are getting more interested,
09:52:24 they are asking more questions about the loan, and we
09:52:27 do plan to follow up on that, because we see this as
09:52:29 the secret, one of the secrets to East Tampa, in terms

09:52:33 of being able to do -- give a face here to East Tampa
09:52:38 in terms of our business establishments.
09:52:43 The other thing that Ernest pointed out was that he's
09:52:46 been a part of the university in terms of doing
09:52:52 service learning projects.
09:52:55 We had students to come in and actually go to the
09:52:57 different businesses and find out if they would
09:53:00 participate in this, long before, and they are now
09:53:06 back in the neighborhoods doing something for us
09:53:07 looking at foreclosures.
09:53:09 So we are in real God partnership with the university.
09:53:14 He's had business networking meetings, so that we are
09:53:18 getting our businesses to come together to just get to
09:53:21 know who they are and what each others are doing in
09:53:24 the neighborhood.
09:53:26 Next we have Maxine woodside, the health, education
09:53:32 and social services.
09:53:34 And there are two things that they have done.
09:53:36 One is that they have done this needs assessment that
09:53:40 was done 12 years ago by another private agency, CDC
09:53:46 of Tampa which was the kickoff to CDC, but the unique
09:53:49 thing about this is that this was residents that did

09:53:58 the interviewing with other residents.
09:54:02 We were out of the way.
09:54:04 And we got some good information about what the
09:54:09 community say they need.
09:54:11 And we have been talking about it.
09:54:13 Now, I know this is all about social service.
09:54:15 I don't want anyone to think we have not grown,
09:54:20 through hearing about the TIF funds and what it can be
09:54:23 used for.
09:54:24 But one of the things about the health and education
09:54:26 social service committee, they are one of the
09:54:29 committees that everybody independently doing small
09:54:31 grants, and to supplement some of their own agendas
09:54:34 and some of the things that they see that the
09:54:37 community says that they need.
09:54:38 So this will be one of the things that we will be
09:54:42 looking to more.
09:54:43 The next thing that they do is to welcome new teacher
09:54:47 event.
09:54:48 Now this is something that was one of the first
09:54:50 community things that ever was started, and it is now
09:54:54 in its fist year.

09:54:55 This past year, we had over 468 teachers, and I know
09:55:02 that sounds like a lot, that moved about and came into
09:55:06 East Tampa, and the unique thing about this is that
09:55:09 you might be an experienced teacher with the school
09:55:12 system and have been working, but you have not been in
09:55:15 East Tampa.
09:55:16 So we take time to welcome you.
09:55:19 We feel that it's an honor for you to come in, and we
09:55:24 do it through a breakfast, we have done it through
09:55:27 lunches, and at the same time we have community
09:55:28 leaders that are there greeting them, welcome them,
09:55:31 sit at the table, tell them about the history of East
09:55:34 Tampa.
09:55:35 And more than anything we start including some of the
09:55:37 youth, that they say if you want to know how to
09:55:40 navigator how you want to know where you get some good
09:55:43 food, or you want to know about tutoring in East
09:55:47 Tampa, you want to know about some of the health
09:55:50 services that you need, we tell them about it.
09:55:52 And it's in a brochure.
09:55:54 The other thing, and why we think this is so
09:55:56 important, and that we realize many of the teachers

09:56:00 that come in, they come in, they teach, and again they
09:56:04 leave.
09:56:05 But by giving them a document, we feel we are
09:56:09 empowering them, that they can better teach our
09:56:11 children and reach out to our parents.
09:56:12 So we see this as a very significant thing.
09:56:15 There were many on the projects that had committee has
09:56:19 been involved with but I want to make sure I don't get
09:56:22 a buzz or anything so I am going to keep it to two or
09:56:25 three little activities.
09:56:27 Carol Marshall, in terms of the land use committee.
09:56:31 What was so unique about Carol, the first thing that
09:56:38 she said that she's accomplished, she's created a good
09:56:41 working relationship with city staff in terms of land
09:56:46 use.
09:56:48 And that means she's spent some time and they have
09:56:52 been in conversation with our committee.
09:56:55 Secondly, she says that she is in constant
09:56:59 communication with neighborhood leaders when they have
09:57:02 had some zoning issues.
09:57:05 She gets in touch with them and makes sure that they
09:57:08 know well what to do.

09:57:09 Michael farmer, who is in charge of the planning and
09:57:13 evaluation.
09:57:16 Again we feel that this is going to be a real
09:57:19 significant in-road to procedures in terms of this
09:57:26 organization.
09:57:28 One of the things that we have created is a project
09:57:32 review criteria for all projects must go through a
09:57:37 certain criteria to make sure it meets the TIF
09:57:41 standards, and if it meets the TIF standards, it will
09:57:45 then come to the CAC.
09:57:47 That is something that we thought we really needed to
09:57:50 set up a criteria that is not a subjective thing on
09:57:55 our part, has been approved and it will come forward
09:58:00 and if it's approved it goes forward.
09:58:03 And I would like to compliment one of our community
09:58:07 persons, Linda grow, who created this and she had
09:58:11 other input from that.
09:58:12 We also, as you know, we got our bylaws of the ETCRP
09:58:18 to come in line with what the CRA policies, and we got
09:58:22 that approved.
09:58:23 We feel that we now know who we are a little bit more
09:58:26 in terms of especially the CAC and the difference in

09:58:31 the two.
09:58:34 We would like to give credit to Ronald Brookins as
09:58:38 chair on that because he really stayed with that until
09:58:40 we got that worked out.
09:58:42 We did, as you know, come up with some new committees.
09:58:45 And as you expanded our committee, we knew that we had
09:58:48 to have some other positions to do some other things.
09:58:50 So we have expanded the new positions, and we are just
09:58:55 waiting to get them a little streamlined so that we
09:58:58 can appoint the persons to those positions.
09:59:05 Next -- wait a minute.
09:59:09 Rosa Cambridge, public safety.
09:59:16 She would like to give thanks to the members of the
09:59:19 police department and the environmental detective for
09:59:22 making the community safe.
09:59:24 They sit on this committee.
09:59:28 They give input, any little things that we hear in the
09:59:32 community comes through this committee and they are
09:59:34 right on top of it.
09:59:37 This committee is a little unique in that she pointed
09:59:42 out they have USF, Dacco, the Black Nurses
09:59:47 Association, SHIP, the fire department, and they are

09:59:54 part of the partnership and members of this committee.
09:59:55 She's created what we call Eyes on East Tampa.
10:00:01 It's going to be a newsletter and she's hoping to roll
10:00:06 it out in 2010.
10:00:08 She has also worked through this committee.
10:00:11 They have worked on what we call team building.
10:00:14 And they report to the community, and they call on the
10:00:19 TPD and the youth council to do more education in the
10:00:22 community.
10:00:27 The housing committee, which is vacant right now and
10:00:31 it will be filled within a few month when we get some
10:00:33 things worked out.
10:00:34 But I spoke on that at this committee.
10:00:36 And I'm proud to announce that we have 13 houses that
10:00:40 were rehabbed in 2008.
10:00:45 Also, I went back and looked at some figures.
10:00:49 Since this rehab program under the East Tampa has been
10:00:53 in existence, we have done 69 houses in terms of East
10:00:57 Tampa.
10:01:00 In 2008, "Paint Your Heart Out" campaign.
10:01:04 And this is one thing I just got the board and I was
10:01:07 excited and I'm trying to find a way to do something,

10:01:11 because I know some things are limited because of TIF
10:01:14 funds.
10:01:15 But in my mind I saw this as an opportunity to give it
10:01:18 a new face lift to East Tampa.
10:01:19 And we stepped out, and were able to do 50-plus houses
10:01:23 strictly in East Tampa, and we challenge all of the
10:01:26 neighborhoods, we are going to do the same next year.
10:01:34 We have a new East Tampa community marketing driven --
10:01:38 marketing committee, which is chaired by -- which the
10:01:43 members are Donald Brookins -- Juan Davis, and Ron
10:01:50 Brookins.
10:01:53 This much is going to be a joint effort with the
10:01:56 service learning project.
10:01:57 And we have been meeting with them, and we just know
10:02:02 that one of the things that we know, we have a good
10:02:04 turnout, and we got a lot of good things going, but we
10:02:09 want to Don more.
10:02:10 So we want to look at ourselves and we are opening
10:02:14 ourselves up to these young people, that go into the
10:02:18 community and meet people that don't come to our
10:02:19 meeting and tell us why not.
10:02:22 We have given them a list of businesses, just go and

10:02:26 ask.
10:02:26 We really want to change our image, if there's one, or
10:02:29 we need to know what our image is.
10:02:31 And we want to just meet the needs of the community a
10:02:34 little bit more.
10:02:38 Now, some of the things that I personally have been
10:02:40 involved with.
10:02:43 One of the things that I saw a need for was monitoring
10:02:48 and encouraging transparency to this organization.
10:02:54 And I set out to do that in many ways, in terms of
10:02:58 making sure all persons who are our members get all of
10:03:04 the information.
10:03:05 I made sure that the media knows whatever meetings are
10:03:09 being held.
10:03:11 I know that you, the City Council, you wanted to know.
10:03:17 I have distributed my package and I understand it is
10:03:20 mailed to you, but I don't know if you read it so I am
10:03:23 just going to give you a little clue right quick.
10:03:26 I had a format that I use in terms of my agenda.
10:03:29 One it will show you the agenda.
10:03:31 Secondly, it will show you when and where the standing
10:03:34 committee meets, time and place.

10:03:39 The number 3 page -- and these pages are numbered in
10:03:41 your handout -- the number 3 page shows you all the
10:03:45 ETCRP meetings which goes out every month to
10:03:50 everybody.
10:03:51 Then at number 4 is your time.
10:03:54 I included when all your meetings are being held.
10:03:57 So whenever someone wants to come that maybe doesn't
10:04:00 come to our meeting, they want to come here, they know
10:04:03 to come here.
10:04:04 Number 5, we included know your neighborhood, and we
10:04:10 give them a listing of all our neighborhoods, where
10:04:12 they meet and who the contact person.
10:04:15 And if you want to flip over and go to the end, when
10:04:18 you get to page 6, you will be talking about the
10:04:20 minutes from the previous meeting.
10:04:22 Just go to the minute and do that right quick.
10:04:25 The other thing that I have worked on is
10:04:28 accountability as I said and oversight, meaning that
10:04:34 by having the different committees meet regularly, and
10:04:38 so that the public will know when we meet, because you
10:04:44 sent out the first notice, but if you keep sending out
10:04:47 this information I might see something on your agenda

10:04:49 that I might want to come and see this time.
10:04:51 I don't want to have to pick up the phone, call
10:04:53 somebody and ask them, where is the meeting?
10:04:55 I know it here and it's this time.
10:04:57 Also, we made sure that our chairmans do send in a
10:05:03 copy of the minutes to Cindy and keep them on file, so
10:05:07 if either one want to come and see, just started to be
10:05:11 a member they can come and they can see theirs.
10:05:15 One of the other things, I guess one of the things
10:05:17 that most people wondered why do I do certain things?
10:05:21 My interest and my passion is in the neighborhoods.
10:05:25 I've spent a lot of time.
10:05:26 And when I took on the position of chair, I did spend
10:05:30 a lot of time in the neighborhoods.
10:05:32 I have been to all neighborhoods that invited me.
10:05:35 I have been right now we have eight other -- 13
10:05:40 neighborhoods that we know when they meet, and I can
10:05:43 go to their meetings whenever, and they welcome me
10:05:48 there.
10:05:48 I'm very proud of that situation.
10:05:51 Just last Tuesday, we had our meeting, and we had six
10:06:00 of our neighborhood leaders present.

10:06:04 We did our little group meetings, and we did our
10:06:07 chitchat, but I want to put emphasis on the
10:06:11 neighborhoods, because in my mind I see them
10:06:14 eventually standing where I am.
10:06:16 But you have to gradually get them to that point.
10:06:19 And one of the ways that I'm trying to do that is that
10:06:22 I have a slot on the program that I earmarked for the
10:06:27 neighborhood association to do the welcome of new
10:06:30 visitors.
10:06:31 They stand.
10:06:32 They do that.
10:06:33 And, at the same time, they can give a little blurb
10:06:39 about how they meet, where they meet and do a little
10:06:41 PR, and as far as I'm concerned it's a little training
10:06:45 before the real training.
10:06:46 So that is the overview of the neighborhoods, and,
10:06:55 lastly, one of the things thatch I'm very proud to
10:06:58 say -- and I was a part of for the past five years --
10:07:02 is the collaboration with the University of South
10:07:05 Florida.
10:07:09 It has been, I think, one of the greatest things that
10:07:14 happened to East Tampa.

10:07:16 We know more about ourselves than we would have ever
10:07:18 known in five years.
10:07:20 I have before you -- and I'm going to wait just a
10:07:23 second.
10:07:24 I want you just to see the document that was presented
10:07:35 to me and to Ed.
10:07:39 We have this on file.
10:07:40 These are all service projects that have been about
10:07:45 East Tampa.
10:07:46 It tells us about our assets, not just the negative
10:07:49 things.
10:07:49 Anything that we want to know about East Tampa is
10:07:53 here.
10:07:53 And what I'm saying to you, what this has done is
10:07:59 given us a lot of confidence, it made us know that we
10:08:01 are not -- you know, you use the term how we got
10:08:04 qualified.
10:08:07 But we don't see ourselves that way.
10:08:08 We got good information here that we can brag about.
10:08:12 What East Tampa is all about.
10:08:14 And I do have a summary copy of this that I would like
10:08:18 to share with you, because I really think -- I really

10:08:31 think if anything we need to now look at how we can
10:08:36 connect the dots with what we got.
10:08:38 We got good information.
10:08:39 And it might not be through getting TIF funds, but we
10:08:44 are going to have to probably come to you and say,
10:08:46 hey, we need some help, because we got good
10:08:49 information.
10:08:51 But where do we go with it now?
10:08:53 Thank you.
10:08:53 Do you have any questions?
10:08:54 >>GWEN MILLER: Mrs. Saul-Sena.
10:08:58 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you for peering today.
10:09:01 You are the first neighborhood I think to do one of
10:09:03 these reports.
10:09:04 And we ask for this in hopes this afternoon we would
10:09:06 get more in-depth information, and you have been so --
10:09:12 really helpful to have the depth of information.
10:09:15 And I want to thank you for using the skills that you
10:09:19 honed as a social worker to develop the capacity in
10:09:24 each of your neighborhoods, in growing your
10:09:27 leadership.
10:09:27 Ultimately we know the city doesn't have the staff or

10:09:30 the resources to help a neighbor evolve.
10:09:34 It's got to come from the people in the neighborhood
10:09:36 and you have created that and grown that in East Tampa
10:09:39 which is huge.
10:09:40 And I just want to ask you -- thank you so much for
10:09:42 sharing this information about the USF collaborative.
10:09:45 Would you mind telling us just briefly some of the
10:09:48 different departments that have collaborated with East
10:09:50 Tampa and the kinds of things that they have done?
10:09:53 Because I think it's really extraordinary, and I want
10:09:57 that information to get out.
10:09:58 >>> Well, one is I would go quickly to the education
10:10:02 department.
10:10:03 We have done the Florida mental health.
10:10:05 We have done architect.
10:10:11 We have done anthropology.
10:10:14 Excuse me.
10:10:19 We have had our history, because we have done some
10:10:22 story telling.
10:10:23 But I know -- and I can give you that list.
10:10:26 I would love to bring that and just pass it to you
10:10:29 because it has been very diverse.

10:10:32 I met so many neat persons through this process of
10:10:34 being in that role what I was doing as a broker.
10:10:38 I was not in this position.
10:10:39 I was the chairman of the health education.
10:10:42 And when the university would contact, have an idea
10:10:46 they would contact me and it was my job to find
10:10:50 someone in the neighborhood to say, is this a need?
10:10:52 Is this something you want?
10:10:53 And if it was a need then we matched them tolling.
10:10:56 So that's how that really happened.
10:10:57 So it's a lot of neighborhoods and a lot of businesses
10:11:00 that have benefited from this.
10:11:01 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Do you have any idea -- I know it's
10:11:05 hard to put a dollar figure on people's hours but you
10:11:07 mention board of director six different departments at
10:11:09 the university and each of them I assume have several
10:11:12 graduate students working on these projects.
10:11:14 >>> I would not.
10:11:16 We started trying to track that kind of information.
10:11:19 But I think the numbers were just -- the numbers would
10:11:24 be astronomical because there was so much dedication
10:11:27 and it was man hours spent that was not just the eight

10:11:31 to five.
10:11:32 I mean, not time, weekends, people got involved.
10:11:36 And the neat thing about the students.
10:11:41 Once they got involved with East Tampa, you know what?
10:11:44 They want to stay involved with East Tampa.
10:11:46 And many of them start doing other volunteer work.
10:11:49 And that's what I really saw was another carrot for
10:11:52 East Tampa, that we had students.
10:11:54 As a matter of fact, last Tuesday night we had
10:11:58 students that were sitting in the audience and
10:12:00 sometimes they come in just to observe us.
10:12:02 And then at the end, they identified themselves.
10:12:05 Oh, yes, I'm going to be work on this kind of project
10:12:07 with you, I want to work on this.
10:12:10 So I like that.
10:12:11 We are getting I call a more sterile view without
10:12:18 influencing them, and I like that.
10:12:19 I like to look at myself and make sure that we are
10:12:21 doing what we say we are doing.
10:12:23 >>GWEN MILLER: Ms. Mill hurricane?
10:12:32 >>MARY MULHERN: Linda, there are 52 projects and
10:12:34 that's amazing.

10:12:35 We have to thank you for all the work you have done in
10:12:37 East Tampa as a volunteer, and also thank USF for this
10:12:45 incredible contribution that they are making to East
10:12:47 Tampa and to the city, for doing all this research and
10:12:52 hands on.
10:12:53 It's amazing just to skim this list and see how many
10:12:56 different areas.
10:12:59 There's health, there's social services, just
10:13:02 everything.
10:13:04 Thank you.
10:13:04 And, you know, you kind of set the bar kind of high
10:13:08 for the next CRA person who has to come.
10:13:13 >>> I just started writing.
10:13:18 I will assist anyone I can.
10:13:19 >> Put your name and position on the record.
10:13:21 >>> He advantage least Best, chairperson of the East
10:13:24 Tampa CRA.
10:13:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Thank you, Mrs. Best, for all you
10:13:31 have done your whole life, especially in the last
10:13:33 year.
10:13:33 A couple of things.
10:13:34 One, I definitely want to plug "Paint Your Heart Out."

10:13:41 City Council and the city attorney's office had a
10:13:43 house last year in East Tampa, and we are going to
10:13:46 have another one this year.
10:13:47 And so I encourage all my council members and staff
10:13:52 and attorneys to join us this year.
10:13:54 I think it's April 25th.
10:13:57 >>> Yes.
10:13:58 >> And also we need to find more houses.
10:14:01 I think there's a lot of folks out there that aren't
10:14:03 familiar with the program and if they are watching us
10:14:05 and feel they might qualify, please have them get in
10:14:08 touch with you or the city on that.
10:14:09 >>> Yes.
10:14:10 >> The other thing I wanted to say in all sincerity, I
10:14:15 was very struck when you were talking about
10:14:18 transparency, accountability and oversight.
10:14:20 And we are hearing those terms quite a bit coming out
10:14:22 of Washington.
10:14:24 I think you are doing probably a better job than they
10:14:26 do in Washington.
10:14:27 I just hope we don't lose you to Washington.
10:14:31 Thank you for all you're doing.

10:14:32 >>> Thank you.
10:14:39 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Thank you again for what you are
10:14:41 doing.
10:14:41 I want to say that from a historical perspective,
10:14:45 history perspective, Sam Kinsey laying the foundation,
10:14:51 the first chairperson.
10:14:52 You have built upon that and moved it to another
10:14:54 level.
10:14:55 Those persons that you are working with, and so all of
10:14:57 them, we are really grateful for that.
10:15:01 It's good to see people get involved in the community.
10:15:03 And move to another level and working with the staff.
10:15:07 And you can see the progress that's being made.
10:15:10 And so I just want to thank you and all those who work
10:15:13 with you at the University of South Florida, may want
10:15:20 to recognize them for the valuable work they have
10:15:22 done, commendation or something of that nature.
10:15:24 I don't know whether we can make a motion on this
10:15:26 board to do that, or City Council.
10:15:32 I would move that we recognize south Florida for their
10:15:35 invaluable work with a letter of commendation.
10:15:43 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Can I speak to the motion?

10:15:44 At this very long list of the USF collaborative it's
10:15:47 the name of the director Judy Jepsen and with a heavy
10:15:53 heart that she has been let go by the University of
10:15:54 South Florida because of their budget cuts.
10:15:57 And I think given the amount of positive energy that
10:16:00 she's generated that we should consider -- I'm just
10:16:04 throwing this out there -- using TIF money from East
10:16:08 Tampa to have her continue to work on getting all
10:16:12 these resources for East Tampa, because frankly I
10:16:14 would rather spend money on that than the banker to do
10:16:17 the facade program.
10:16:18 I think we could get a banker for 5% and spend the
10:16:21 rest of the on the USF collaborative.
10:16:24 When you look at all that's gone on, I didn't find
10:16:27 this out till I went to the people from Sarasota's
10:16:29 presentation, and Judy told all this great stuff and
10:16:32 then she started crying and said I just lost my job,
10:16:35 and I thought, oh, my God, this is a travesty, and
10:16:38 bathe it's because USF is facing the same devastating
10:16:41 cuts that everybody else is.
10:16:42 So I think that's something we should look at.
10:16:47 >> We have a motion for commendation.

10:16:49 We are going to vote on the commendation.
10:16:51 All in favor of that motion say Aye.
10:16:54 Opposes?
10:16:58 >> And rebuilding Tampa Bay is recognized, you know,
10:17:01 last week, Jose also of East Tampa, I don't know if
10:17:05 you are aware or not, but they did work in East Tampa,
10:17:10 with rebuilding some houses.
10:17:15 I just wanted to kind of highlight them again as well
10:17:18 for the work they have done.
10:17:19 So a lot of people really put a lot of energy and
10:17:22 time.
10:17:22 And we are indeed thankful for ed and his staff who
10:17:29 has been a part of this whole process.
10:17:31 >>GWEN MILLER: Now that you see that East Tampa is
10:17:33 doing a great job, all I want to get from you now are
10:17:37 good compliments.
10:17:38 We have working and let's keep going.
10:17:40 We have no negative comments about East Tampa because
10:17:42 they are really working.
10:17:43 And I listened to you this morning.
10:17:45 And you say what a good job you have been, what you
10:17:50 have been doing.

10:17:51 Let's keep it going.
10:17:52 >>MARK HUEY: On behalf of the staff, we have five
10:17:55 guiding principles that are at the heart of our
10:17:57 redevelopment efforts, and than the very first one is
10:18:00 community collaboration.
10:18:01 And I just want to read it to you.
10:18:06 Community collaboration.
10:18:06 We will proactively engage the talents and energies of
10:18:09 our citizens and key institutions and revitalizing our
10:18:14 community.
10:18:16 Isn't that what T.H.A.N. and the team in East Tampa is
10:18:19 doing?
10:18:19 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank you, Ms. Best, for a great report
10:18:27 and all the God things you are doing.
10:18:29 I know you are going to keep it up so I don't have to
10:18:31 say that.
10:18:31 And whatever you need us to do to help you it's there
10:18:34 for you.
10:18:35 Okay.
10:18:36 We have a walk-on, Mr. Sal Territo, our attorney.
10:18:39 >>SAL TERRITO: Legal department.
10:18:40 You know, for several weeks -- several meetings you

10:18:43 have been dealing with policies of the CRA and your
10:18:46 relationship for the board with citizens advisory
10:18:49 committees.
10:18:50 You had a policy that was submitted to you several
10:18:53 meetings ago that you asked me to revise.
10:18:56 I have submitted to you a revised policy that is not
10:19:03 as --
10:19:05 >> Draconian?
10:19:06 >>> Okay, for lack of a better word.
10:19:08 [ Laughter ]
10:19:08 It not as restricted as the previous policy was, the
10:19:13 policy was basically saying you should not attend
10:19:16 these meetings.
10:19:17 Now you are being urged not to but you are not
10:19:19 prohibited from attending meetings, and also there was
10:19:21 a provision in there dealing with ex parte
10:19:23 communications which I was asked to remove which I
10:19:25 have removed.
10:19:26 And the policy now is basically urging someone not to
10:19:30 attend, if you do attend to make sure that you let the
10:19:33 advisory committees know that you are there in your
10:19:36 own capacity, that you are not speaking for the board,

10:19:38 unless the board has taken a position on that, and
10:19:41 obviously you can go there and speak on the board's
10:19:42 position.
10:19:43 It's those kinds of provisions that you have asked me
10:19:47 to put in there that I have done.
10:19:49 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I don't have the specific language.
10:19:51 I got it earlier in the week but I don't have it in
10:19:54 front of me today.
10:19:55 I would like to see it before we vote on it, if we
10:19:57 vote on it.
10:19:58 But when I looked at it earlier in the week, I sent an
10:20:01 e-mail and I said, why are we doing this at all?
10:20:04 And I apologize to this board.
10:20:08 I had missed the meeting where this came up.
10:20:10 But I just don't get it.
10:20:13 I don't get it at all.
10:20:14 I think it's really silly to be tying our hand and
10:20:20 constraining ourselves.
10:20:21 I mean, for example, Chairman Scott -- councilman
10:20:27 Scott, you know, represents East Tampa.
10:20:30 Most of his district is in East Tampa.
10:20:33 Some of it goes into other parts of the city.

10:20:35 I would say 80% is probably East Tampa.
10:20:38 Why would we want to constrain Chairman Scott to pop
10:20:41 his head in on the East Tampa CAC meeting just to sit
10:20:46 in the back and hear what's going on, chat with his
10:20:50 constituents, that sort of thing?
10:20:51 And let him know he's concerned.
10:20:54 Why would we want to discourage that?
10:20:55 I would think he would want to encourage that.
10:20:58 Similarly, councilman Miranda.
10:20:59 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: No, no, I don't go to meetings.
10:21:02 Leave me out of that vegetable soup because I don't go
10:21:05 there.
10:21:07 >> Similarly the West Tampa councilman whoever that
10:21:09 might be in the future has Drew Park in his district.
10:21:12 Okay?
10:21:13 I just want to say it generically, Charlie.
10:21:16 I'm just making my argument generically.
10:21:19 I'm not talking about individuals.
10:21:20 I'm talking about positions.
10:21:21 Your district is West Tampa.
10:21:22 Drew Park is completely in West Tampa.
10:21:24 Why on earth would we want to discourage the West

10:21:27 Tampa district councilman from attending that?
10:21:30 Ms. Mulhern is city-wide.
10:21:32 Okay.
10:21:33 And as are several others.
10:21:35 Okay.
10:21:36 Same thing.
10:21:36 If they want to pop in and sit in the back and -- I'm
10:21:40 not saying, you know, actively participate and try and
10:21:43 shape the discussions and be there and speak on
10:21:46 behalf.
10:21:47 But this policy the way I read it earlier in the week,
10:21:50 and if I could take a look at it real quick, I think
10:21:52 it says that somewhere in there that we want to
10:21:56 discourage council members, or board members, this
10:22:01 board, from attending those meetings.
10:22:04 That doesn't make any sense to me at all.
10:22:05 We should be as involved, deeply involved in attending
10:22:08 these things and talking to these folks and helping
10:22:11 them and encouraging them.
10:22:13 I think they would be absolutely thrilled to see us
10:22:15 sit in the back of those meetings, and listening and
10:22:19 hearing and, you know, we shouldn't have to hear from

10:22:24 Ms. Best to come here and tell us what she's doing, we
10:22:26 should be able to go over there and do that.
10:22:28 And Ms. Best is clapping her hands because she's not
10:22:30 on camera so I'm going to say that.
10:22:32 So obviously she is one person who agrees with me.
10:22:35 And I bet if he would got all the other CAC folks here
10:22:38 they would agree as well.
10:22:40 So I just think this is the wrong direction, it's the
10:22:43 wrong message to our community.
10:22:45 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr.
10:22:46 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Miranda point and counterpoint.
10:22:49 As you well know, I'm not going to speak to that
10:22:53 point.
10:22:54 When a council member attends a meeting, that they
10:23:02 themselves appoint the people to that board, and
10:23:04 another council member, with or without notification
10:23:07 shows up, and if two council members speak to what
10:23:13 they call a conflict of interest, a violation of the
10:23:15 sunshine law and other things illegally.
10:23:19 It has become apparent to me, anyway, that these
10:23:22 things were going on.
10:23:24 Not maybe two but one, on a consistent basis.

10:23:29 I don't want to appoint anyone to a board and have me
10:23:32 sitting in the back or in the front or in the third
10:23:34 row or wherever.
10:23:37 By the mere presence of an elected official -- and I'm
10:23:40 not talking about myself -- it sends a message that
10:23:43 board doesn't know what they are doing.
10:23:45 And it was specifically discussed that if a council
10:23:48 member is invited by the board chairman, if I remember
10:23:52 the whole facts, and other council members are advised
10:23:56 of that meeting, that was fine, if you had an
10:24:01 invitation to go.
10:24:04 We have a country of laws.
10:24:07 We have a city of laws.
10:24:08 I don't want to skirt or have the impropriety or image
10:24:12 that we are violating or have attempted to violate the
10:24:18 mental capacity of those individuals that are doing a
10:24:20 job well done for the least amount of money, which is
10:24:26 zero, to make their community a better place to live.
10:24:31 For me, anyway -- I'm only speaking about myself -- to
10:24:34 go to any one of the CRA meetings, and maybe impose
10:24:39 what I think that you may not want to talk about but
10:24:43 that's what I want to hear on this side, is an

10:24:47 impropriety of fact, somewhat regulation of my duties
10:24:54 as an elected official -- and I'm speaking about
10:24:56 myself.
10:24:58 And these things, little things lead on to bigger
10:25:01 things.
10:25:05 Let me tell you why I ran for office.
10:25:06 I ran for office because in 2006, in December of that
10:25:11 year, I went to baby-sit my three granddaughters.
10:25:16 I have eight kids, six girls and two boys.
10:25:19 And I think they were baby-sitting me because they
10:25:22 were already 14, 11 and 9.
10:25:25 And it so happens that the television was on the City
10:25:27 Council meeting.
10:25:28 And I heard a discussion talking about if you pay this
10:25:33 much to the homeowners association, we might be able
10:25:35 to work it out.
10:25:38 I talked to myself.
10:25:40 You know what?
10:25:40 I can't stand that.
10:25:43 I don't want to see that, even though it's aboveboard,
10:25:46 I'm not going to say it's not.
10:25:48 Certain hearings during the council meeting, I sat

10:25:51 here and I started listening.
10:25:52 Well, I've got a contract with so-and-so where I'm
10:25:55 paying half a million dollars.
10:25:57 And I got a contract.
10:25:58 And I told myself, this is not going to happen as long
10:26:00 as Charlie Miranda is elected here.
10:26:02 So what I'm trying to stop is the appearance -- and
10:26:08 I'm not saying that's all a fact -- the appearances of
10:26:12 wrongdoing.
10:26:13 I have enough problems in government when individuals,
10:26:18 that's why the majority of people adopt like elected
10:26:20 officials, don't trust the government, and don't
10:26:22 really care what happens because they feel like they
10:26:24 have been run over by a semi, and then a big water
10:26:29 compacter ran them over and they are thin as an inch,
10:26:33 because we take a job, you retire, and back in the
10:26:39 same job making the same amount of money, while the
10:26:41 rest of the people are starving to death.
10:26:44 I'm getting tired of seeing this.
10:26:51 Not talking about the City of Tampa, talking about all
10:26:53 the governments.
10:26:54 And this is what's getting to me, it getting to the

10:26:56 taxpayers, it's getting to every citizen.
10:26:59 So I try to avoid all of that by saying, I'm not going
10:27:02 to do it.
10:27:04 I don't even go to the general meetings of all of
10:27:06 them.
10:27:07 I get criticized once in a while, that's fine.
10:27:10 But I would rather hear it from Ms. Best.
10:27:12 And I met with Ms. Beth privately months ago.
10:27:15 And for the record she's saying yes.
10:27:18 So what I'm saying is that I don't want to see
10:27:24 anyone's name in the headline that I work with,
10:27:29 including myself.
10:27:31 I think it's days tasteful.
10:27:34 I think the government is not liked by the people it
10:27:36 serves for various reasons.
10:27:39 Not the things he would don't do but for the things
10:27:41 that we do do.
10:27:43 Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
10:27:44 >>GWEN MILLER: Mrs. Mulhern.
10:27:46 >>MARY MULHERN: I ran for office because I had a sense
10:27:49 that people didn't foal like they were getting their
10:27:55 needs and their message across to the city, and I

10:27:59 wanted to be able to listen to people and help them to
10:28:04 have more influence on what is happening in their
10:28:07 neighborhood.
10:28:09 I don't understand.
10:28:09 I totally agree with Mr. Dingfelder.
10:28:12 And what I don't understand about this discussion, or
10:28:15 this policy, is that we as the board, I don't feel
10:28:20 that we ask for direction in this area.
10:28:23 And I also think that if people have a bad idea,
10:28:28 negative impression of politicians, it might help if
10:28:32 we were more respectful to each other and weren't
10:28:37 suggesting that other people were trying to skirt
10:28:40 sunshine laws or do something illegal.
10:28:42 But I have been on council for almost two years and I
10:28:45 have never had anyone mention anything like that other
10:28:48 than the city's own staff trying to imply that this
10:28:52 council was trying to skirt the sunshine law.
10:28:57 I really don't need to hear it anymore.
10:29:00 I feel like that disrespect is fostered by people
10:29:06 implying that we are trying to do something other than
10:29:09 listen to our constituents and help neighborhoods
10:29:15 affect how their tax dollars are spent, especially in

10:29:17 community redevelopment areas where the money goes
10:29:19 right back in, and we are the board of the community
10:29:23 redevelopment area.
10:29:24 So I think that -- and I certainly have the impression
10:29:30 and the feeling that -- these feelings are shared by
10:29:34 people on the board, and I'm really tired of us
10:29:36 wasting our time talking about how we should conduct
10:29:39 business, when there hasn't really been any indication
10:29:42 that we are doing anything untoward.
10:29:45 And I think it's a benefit to listen to a group, a
10:29:51 committee, actual elected by their own neighborhood
10:29:56 and what their concerns are.
10:29:58 I mean, Ms. Best is fantastic.
10:30:00 She's articulate.
10:30:02 She's, you know, communicated.
10:30:04 She told us, you know, she gave credit to all the
10:30:07 people on her committee and all the chairs of the
10:30:09 different subcommittees.
10:30:11 But, now, maybe if we were there, there was one person
10:30:14 she didn't have time to mention or one idea, and I
10:30:18 want to hear from people.
10:30:22 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Dingfelder.

10:30:23 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Thank you.
10:30:29 I have been an attorney for almost 20 years, Charlie,
10:30:32 and most of that has been related to government, okay?
10:30:35 I know sunshine, okay.
10:30:38 And I know that this board does not violate sunshine.
10:30:44 But, okay, it appears that we are trying to kill a
10:30:47 GNAT with a sledge hammer. If there's a sunshine
10:30:51 concern -- and that's fine, we should always be
10:30:53 concerned about sunshine -- if there's sunshine
10:30:56 concern then the only policy we need is something
10:30:58 along the lines of this.
10:31:00 If two or more council members are in attendance, they
10:31:03 should not speak on substantive issues to avoid any
10:31:07 violations of the sunshine.
10:31:08 That's it.
10:31:09 That's all we need to do.
10:31:11 The other policy that I do like in here that says if
10:31:14 an agency board member does decide to speak at the CAC
10:31:18 meetings, he or she should state that he or she is
10:31:25 only speaking as an.
10:31:29 Individual member and not speaking for the board.
10:31:30 Those are the only two policies I think we need to

10:31:32 address.
10:31:33 This but to start out by saying agency board members
10:31:35 are urged not to attend CAC meetings I think is the
10:31:39 long message to the community, it's the wrong message
10:31:41 to the CACs.
10:31:43 I think if he would want to go that direction we
10:31:45 should poll each one of the individual CACs and say,
10:31:49 is that what you want?
10:31:50 You don't want us at your meetings?
10:31:52 Because we have one CAC member right here who I think
10:31:56 would get up here and disagree with this policy, and I
10:31:58 think the rest of them would, too.
10:32:00 So let's not kill the gnat with the sledge hammer.
10:32:04 Let's try to do this with some surgical precision and
10:32:07 address the issues we need to.
10:32:08 I think either table this or amend it as I suggested.
10:32:13 But I urge council not to go this direction.
10:32:16 This is the wrong way to go.
10:32:18 >>GWEN MILLER: Reverend Scott.
10:32:20 >>THOMAS SCOTT: I don't know how we got off onto this,
10:32:24 but I don't know who brought it to the council.
10:32:31 I don't really remember how it got here.

10:32:32 That's number one.
10:32:33 Number two, as I recall -- and I want to just be
10:32:38 straight.
10:32:39 I'm just a straight person.
10:32:41 'N as I recall the issue came out of the fact that
10:32:44 Councilwoman Saul-Sena was at Channelside and was
10:32:51 imposing her will on Channelside CRA.
10:32:53 That's what I was told.
10:32:54 I got a call.
10:32:55 I don't know how true that is.
10:32:56 The next thing I know we had a policy coming forth.
10:32:59 I think you spoke to that.
10:33:01 So my position has always been this.
10:33:03 My position is, one, if I'm AP elected official I have
10:33:07 a right to represent my constituency and go to any
10:33:09 meeting that I choose to go that does not violate the
10:33:16 sunshine law.
10:33:18 You can put that into that policy, John, but the state
10:33:21 law has not been.
10:33:26 Now my position, I don't go to the CRA meeting because
10:33:28 I don't want to impose my will upon the CRAs, okay.
10:33:31 I people if you want me to come, then invite me to

10:33:34 come, then I will come and talk with you about
10:33:37 anything.
10:33:38 But I'm not coming to your meeting because I appointed
10:33:42 you.
10:33:42 I voted for you.
10:33:43 And I think you have a right-of-way to have your
10:33:45 meeting without being intimidated by my presence.
10:33:48 I'm talking about me.
10:33:49 I'm not talking about nobody else.
10:33:50 I'm talking about Tom Scott.
10:33:52 So that is the reason I choose not to come to CRA
10:33:55 meetings, because I want you to foal free to speak
10:34:00 your mind, your opinion and make a recommendation.
10:34:03 Also we are going to decide anyway.
10:34:05 So I don't want to impose my will.
10:34:06 I want you to be free.
10:34:08 And I figure if you want me to come, then you will
10:34:10 tell me that, and I will come and moat with you.
10:34:14 Otherwise, I have what I call community meeting.
10:34:16 I call my own meeting and talk to you and hear from
10:34:19 you, to see what you have to say.
10:34:21 That's the on the thing.

10:34:22 When you have your meeting, you are in control.
10:34:24 When I have my meeting, I'm in control.
10:34:25 And therefore I listen to what you have to say.
10:34:28 So that's my position on that.
10:34:30 And if you all don't want this policy, I don't know
10:34:33 who made it, I don't know who brought it, but we need
10:34:37 to move on.
10:34:37 >> Let's move on.
10:34:39 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: I think that's what we should do.
10:34:42 I did not get a copy of this.
10:34:44 Maybe I am being discriminated for some reason.
10:34:46 I don't have a CRA in my district.
10:34:48 But we convened -- can beat this thing to death
10:34:51 whether we hit it with a sledge hammer but let's get
10:34:54 over it.
10:34:56 >>GWEN MILLER: I think we are over it, Mr. Caetano.
10:34:58 But the thing is we have it on this agenda and we need
10:35:01 to do something with it.
10:35:02 We can't let it just float out there in the air.
10:35:04 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Move to receive and file.
10:35:07 >>GWEN MILLER: I'm talking, Ms. Saul-Sena.
10:35:10 I don't think we need to let it float out there.

10:35:12 I think we need to do something about it.
10:35:14 I'm speaking as Gwen Miller.
10:35:17 I don't attend these meetings because I know if the
10:35:19 CRA has any questions or concerns to talk about they
10:35:22 are going to ask me to come to the meetings and when I
10:35:24 go to the meetings I am not going to take control of
10:35:26 their meetings.
10:35:28 If they invite me, they invite me because they want to
10:35:31 ask me questions.
10:35:32 Ask me there.
10:35:35 So I think something needs to be done and need to walk
10:35:38 in these meetings and you jump up and you start
10:35:40 talking about their agenda, they don't want you to
10:35:43 take over their meeting.
10:35:44 They know what they want to do in their communities.
10:35:47 And they know what they need in their community.
10:35:49 So I think they should run their meetings and run the
10:35:52 way they want to run it so I think we need to do
10:35:54 something about it.
10:35:57 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I echo the sentiments of Chairman
10:36:00 Miller and the community redevelopment and Chairman
10:36:02 Scott of the City Council.

10:36:06 It is incumbent -- do we go to any other meetings?
10:36:10 Do we go to variance review meetings and sit here on
10:36:13 things that might be appealed to us?
10:36:15 The answer is no.
10:36:16 Do we go to these meetings?
10:36:18 Some do and some don't.
10:36:19 This doesn't say you can't go to the meeting.
10:36:24 What it says is, whether attending a CAC meeting in a
10:36:30 formal capacity, whether invited to the meeting or
10:36:33 deciding to attend the meeting on one's own, or having
10:36:37 a one-on-one conversation with a CAC member, or
10:36:42 community shareholder, or if the agency member
10:36:46 discusses CRA business with a CAC member or a
10:36:51 constituent of the CRA, he or she shall report the
10:36:56 conversation to the agency's next meeting.
10:36:59 Than men's for all of us.
10:37:02 When we talk about transparency earlier, Ms. Best
10:37:05 brought it up, everybody was fine.
10:37:08 These all this is about.
10:37:09 Transparency.
10:37:13 The people know what somebody discussed so there is no
10:37:16 mind-set of impropriety in any way.

10:37:20 We appoint good people to these boards.
10:37:26 Why should I -- and I'm only talking about me -- go to
10:37:30 these meetings, and by the mere presence, whether it
10:37:34 me or my predecessor or anyone else in the future, sit
10:37:38 there and be like the guiding light?
10:37:43 Let me see what you say so I can hold it against you
10:37:46 later.
10:37:46 That's not the way I operate.
10:37:48 You know what's best for your neighborhoods.
10:37:50 You know what's best for your area.
10:37:51 You know what you need in that area.
10:37:54 You are the ones that are there day in and day night
10:37:57 working with the managers of the CRA.
10:37:59 You know exactly what's needed.
10:38:02 At that time when all the information is gathered,
10:38:05 when all the consensuses are formulated, when all the
10:38:09 plan is in place, then you bring it up here in a
10:38:14 normal setting, so that we, the significant seven, can
10:38:19 vote on it.
10:38:21 That's all what this is about.
10:38:24 So what we are saying is, let's clean up, shower away
10:38:31 any debris that we may have on a fallout from

10:38:34 something like this that could become -- and I've
10:38:38 never said this is a conflict of any sunshine.
10:38:41 What could be a violation that I don't want to see my
10:38:47 name or anybody else's name that I work with on any
10:38:50 head loins.
10:38:51 That's what this is about.
10:38:52 And for me to vote to get this into receive and file,
10:38:55 that means the status quo exactly like it was before.
10:38:59 I have been around the block a long time.
10:39:00 That's exactly what it means.
10:39:03 So I'm not going to vote to receive and file.
10:39:08 This council may or may not approve this.
10:39:10 But I think the public is entitled to a vote.
10:39:13 Receive and file is very easy.
10:39:16 Put it away in a drawer and let it draw dust and
10:39:18 everybody will forget it.
10:39:21 That's not the way I was brought up.
10:39:22 Thank you, Madam Chair.
10:39:24 >>GWEN MILLER: Mrs. Saul-Sena.
10:39:25 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you.
10:39:26 I have to say in my years of public service I have
10:39:28 never been called intimidating.

10:39:31 I also haven't attended any CRA meetings subsequent to
10:39:35 our conversation, although Andy, the chair of the
10:39:39 Channel District, says, why did you stop coming?
10:39:41 And I said, because of this.
10:39:43 I am a complete respectful person in terms of the
10:39:49 sunshine laws.
10:39:50 And this is such a brouhaha.
10:39:52 And council members, we have spent way too long on
10:39:55 this.
10:39:55 I call the question.
10:39:56 Let's vote to receive and file this.
10:40:00 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I have a point of order.
10:40:02 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr.
10:40:03 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Ding this was not on the agenda.
10:40:05 I think it's too important to be voting on something
10:40:07 like this, not being on the agenda.
10:40:10 Councilman Caetano indicated that he hadn't had a
10:40:13 chance to even read it.
10:40:15 So I'm going to withdraw my motion on the receive and
10:40:20 file with all due respect.
10:40:22 Councilman Miranda thinks he wants to vote on this or
10:40:24 something like this.

10:40:25 What I'm suggesting is let's bring to the next month.
10:40:27 I'm going to bring some alternative language in and
10:40:30 let's continue this discussion, because if it's that
10:40:34 important then let's deal with it next month.
10:40:36 So I'm going to withdraw my motion, if somebody else
10:40:40 wants to move up.
10:40:41 Otherwise I move to continue it to next month so we
10:40:43 can be done with this meeting and move on.
10:40:44 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Caetano?
10:40:47 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: I would like to make a motion
10:40:49 that we accept this and vote on it and let get it over
10:40:51 with.
10:40:51 Because we are beating the hell out of it.
10:40:55 >>GWEN MILLER: Second?
10:40:56 >>MARY MULHERN: What's your motion?
10:40:58 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: The motion is to accept it as it
10:41:00 is.
10:41:02 As it is, yes.
10:41:04 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Second the motion and I'll speak to
10:41:06 the second.
10:41:06 This was brought up by the attorney who represents us
10:41:11 and the Community Redevelopment Agency who has been

10:41:13 doing this for a lot longer than anyone else.
10:41:16 So I'm going to second that based on those facts.
10:41:21 >>THOMAS SCOTT: My only concern is the language what
10:41:27 my colleagues on this are saying -- I think that
10:41:30 language needs to be changed.
10:41:31 So I think that language there needs to be changed.
10:41:34 When you say you are going to discourage council
10:41:39 members from attending meetings.
10:41:41 You can rephrase it.
10:41:43 >> It right there.
10:41:46 >>SAL TERRITO: To use sog caution, if you want to use
10:41:48 some other word.
10:41:50 If you want to take that language out, it's your call.
10:41:56 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Mr. Dingfelder had some other language
10:41:58 as well.
10:41:59 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'm not opposed to holding it for a
10:42:01 month but I tell you the substance should be the same.
10:42:03 >>THOMAS SCOTT: I agree with that.
10:42:05 I think this language, though, somehow or other, says
10:42:11 elected officials that we are going to discourage you
10:42:13 from going to the meeting.
10:42:14 I think in my opinion use your own discretion.

10:42:17 That's why I can't speak for nobody else, it's what I
10:42:21 do.
10:42:21 >>SAL TERRITO: The language we have in there is
10:42:24 actually urge not to attend F.that's too strong a word
10:42:26 we can change that.
10:42:27 You can simply say if you are attending these meetings
10:42:30 be aware of this.
10:42:32 If you don't like the language in there that says
10:42:34 discourage or don't attend, we can take the
10:42:37 prohibition language out.
10:42:38 We can amend that if you want to and you can vote on
10:42:41 it today.
10:42:41 I need some language, that I can come up with some
10:42:43 language if you like.
10:42:45 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I think it's better if we are
10:42:47 banging around the language carry it over to next
10:42:50 month and we'll massage it and soften it up a little
10:42:53 bit so we can all be happy with it.
10:42:59 >>SAL TERRITO: This is your policy, not mine.
10:43:01 Agency board members are urged to exercise caution
10:43:04 when attending these meetings.
10:43:06 That way, it's the urge for the caution, not for the

10:43:10 attendance.
10:43:11 If you want to change the language, agency board
10:43:12 members are urged to exercise caution when attending
10:43:16 these meetings.
10:43:17 I can amend that language very easily, if you like.
10:43:20 The substitute language.
10:43:21 You can vote on it today or not.
10:43:22 It's your call.
10:43:23 >>GWEN MILLER: Okay, we have substitute language.
10:43:25 I would like that.
10:43:29 >>MARY MULHERN: Hello, I would like to be recognized.
10:43:31 I wasn't going to support Mr. Dingfelder's motion
10:43:34 because I think queue wasted a lot of time on this.
10:43:37 I don't think this came from this board.
10:43:39 And I also have no sense that it's coming from the CRA
10:43:47 districts or from the community.
10:43:48 So -- but I thought bet of it and I will support the
10:43:53 motion to continue this so that it can be on the
10:43:55 agenda as a public hearing, and we can maybe here
10:43:59 from -- hear from some constituents.
10:44:01 If I come to -- and I haven't been to -- I don't think
10:44:05 I have been to one of your meetings without being

10:44:07 invited.
10:44:09 The only one I have been invited to was the East Tampa
10:44:12 where all of East Tampa was invited.
10:44:15 And I am not going to show up uninvited.
10:44:18 But I also find this insulting to me.
10:44:21 If we were exercising caution, we never would have run
10:44:25 for City Council.
10:44:28 You know, it obviously not the most rewarding at times
10:44:35 experience.
10:44:36 But I don't think that -- I think we are under the
10:44:42 sunshine law.
10:44:43 We have to abide by that.
10:44:44 And I don't feel like there's any need for this.
10:44:47 And I could be convinced by constituents of this CRA
10:44:53 districts if they feel that they don't want council
10:44:57 members to come to their meetings, maybe that would
10:45:00 convince me.
10:45:00 But the idea that this is coming from the
10:45:02 administration to really try to interfere with us, our
10:45:13 relationship with our constituents, and this board, I
10:45:17 don't believe asks for this policy.
10:45:22 I don't know.

10:45:22 Maybe someone can remained me again if there was a
10:45:26 motion to ask for legal to tell us.
10:45:33 I'm going to stop talking now because I have had two
10:45:35 bites of the apple.
10:45:39 >>SAL TERRITO: There is a motion on the floor to
10:45:40 approve this.
10:45:41 It was seconded.
10:45:44 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I would move to have clarity to
10:45:46 have the word changed urged not to attend, but if I
10:45:50 may, the administration -- and I'm not here to protect
10:45:52 this administration or any administration.
10:45:55 They did not write bring this up.
10:45:57 I brought it up.
10:46:01 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Miranda, our attorney says we can
10:46:04 take a vote on it today.
10:46:05 >>SAL TERRITO: You have a motion on the floor to
10:46:09 approve it.
10:46:10 There was a second.
10:46:11 The suggestion was made to change the language.
10:46:13 Mr. Miranda seconded it.
10:46:16 >> He withdrew.
10:46:17 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Withdraw the second to the clarity

10:46:21 of all the language.
10:46:25 >>SAL TERRITO: Okay. All I was going to say is there
10:46:25 was a motion on the floor. It was seconded. If you
10:46:25 are withdrawing, that's fine.
10:46:26 The suggestion was made to change the language.
10:46:29 That's where we are right now.
10:46:30 So we had a motion and a second that's been removed.
10:46:39 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Scott.
10:46:40 >>THOMAS SCOTT: I make a motion we continue this to
10:46:43 next month and give the attorney an opportunity to
10:46:46 refine the language on that, in that area.
10:46:53 >>SAL TERRITO: The language is there if you want to do
10:46:55 it now.
10:46:56 He says he.
10:46:58 >>THOMAS SCOTT: He says he hasn't had a chance to read
10:47:00 it so at least give him an opportunity to read it.
10:47:07 >>GWEN MILLER: That was a walk-on.
10:47:08 It should have been on the agenda and it wasn't so he
10:47:11 asked to walk it on.
10:47:12 >> Second.
10:47:13 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion and second to continue
10:47:14 to next month.

10:47:15 All in favor say Aye.
10:47:16 Opposed, Nay.
10:47:19 >>
10:47:20 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Saul-Sena voting no.
10:47:24 >>GWEN MILLER: We now go to our public comments.
10:47:26 Anyone in the public that would like to speak.
10:47:30 >>SAL TERRITO: I was asked by the chair to anyone
10:47:33 speaking on items that are on the agenda.
10:47:37 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Can't speak to anything before the
10:47:40 CRA?
10:47:41 >>> It says anything on the agenda is the way your
10:47:44 agenda reads.
10:47:45 They may speak to any item that's on the agenda.
10:47:48 If you want to do something other than that, then you
10:47:50 have to take a vote to waive the rules.
10:47:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Well, let's hear what people want
10:47:57 to speak on.
10:47:57 If they want to speak on something different then
10:47:59 we'll consider wavering the rules.
10:48:01 >>GWEN MILLER: Come on, Mr. Davis, let's start.
10:48:05 >>> Al Davis: Madam Chairman, members of the CRA
10:48:12 board.

10:48:12 This speaker's name is Al Davis.
10:48:14 And I'm a person that lives, works within the East
10:48:22 Tampa community redevelopment area.
10:48:30 And you have to forgive me if I may make a comment.
10:48:33 It not to offend, but only to let you know that I
10:48:36 think my humility has been assaulted.
10:48:44 I listened diligently to your discussion on the CRA
10:48:52 and the CAC policy, and I was wondering if you were
10:48:58 familiar with your own rules of procedure in terms of
10:49:06 how to conduct business in a rules of procedure
10:49:20 matter.
10:49:20 But be that as it may.
10:49:28 I commend this board for the objectives of having the
10:49:38 funding resource to redevelop the certain areas within
10:49:45 the City of Tampa.
10:49:53 I commend mark and his staff, particularly Ed Johnson
10:49:56 and his staff from the East Tampa area, because they
10:50:02 are overseeing the redevelopment.
10:50:06 This 6 and $7 million including fiscal year '09 is one
10:50:15 that has come to my attention in terms of where we
10:50:19 are, and where we go.
10:50:27 A progress report that was presented -- and I commend

10:50:30 the chairperson to use the term East Tampa, but, you
10:50:37 see, East Tampa could be misleading.
10:50:39 And I presume when we use the term East Tampa, we are
10:50:43 talking about the East Tampa CRA area.
10:50:48 You appointed 13 members as the group interaction
10:50:59 could be taking place in terms of giving to you the
10:51:04 recommendation on the implementation of the CRA plan
10:51:10 as well as the upcoming revised strategic action plan.
10:51:16 I like to work smarter and not harder.
10:51:22 I like to know how things come to be, how things will
10:51:27 be, and how we can make things happen.
10:51:31 So with that, Madam Chairman, I do want to commend Ed
10:51:35 Johnson and his staff for this nice progress report.
10:51:40 (Bell sounds)
10:51:41 May I continue by saying thank you again.
10:51:46 It is from reports that are provided that triggers my
10:51:57 interest and to see where we are going and how worry
10:52:00 going to get there.
10:52:01 Thank you.
10:52:01 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank you.
10:52:03 Next speaker.
10:52:08 >>> Good morning.

10:52:10 My name is Greg stout, the president of the Tampa
10:52:12 police benevolent association.
10:52:14 I'm the president of the union that represents the
10:52:17 over 985 police officers.
10:52:20 >>GWEN MILLER: Sir, may I interrupt you one second?
10:52:22 This meeting is just for Community Redevelopment
10:52:23 Agency.
10:52:26 And if you are going to talk about something in the
10:52:27 city, you need to come to a regular City Council
10:52:30 meeting to discuss it.
10:52:32 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Madam Chair, point of order.
10:52:36 They have been patient.
10:52:38 I see this gentleman and many of his members here, as
10:52:40 well as some other folks in the community who I think
10:52:45 might have spoken on some of these issues in the past.
10:52:47 What I would suggest is we waive the rules, three
10:52:49 minutes on each side, if there's another side to this,
10:52:52 and they want to speak F.not, just three minutes to
10:52:54 waive the rules to hear out the representative for the
10:52:58 PBA.
10:53:00 They are citizens, they are employees, they take time
10:53:02 off from busy schedules.

10:53:03 I think he would should give them the courtesy of
10:53:06 waiving our rules and hearing them out.
10:53:07 It's a little abnormal because we are in a CRA meeting
10:53:10 but I think we can do that.
10:53:12 You have had to listen to us for a lot longer than
10:53:15 three minutes.
10:53:16 We can listen to you for three minutes.
10:53:18 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I am not going to support the
10:53:20 waiving of the rules.
10:53:21 Again these are CRA meetings.
10:53:22 Time and time again.
10:53:23 And I appreciate everything that the head of the PBA
10:53:27 and individuals for and against whatever the item he's
10:53:30 going to bring up here for.
10:53:31 But this is not the proper setting to receive this
10:53:35 information.
10:53:38 It is again -- if we start doing these things today,
10:53:42 multiply the fact you are going to have a CRA meeting
10:53:44 that lasts two days, and I'm not opposed to something
10:53:47 lasting longer than the time allotted for.
10:53:50 But we are going to get again in a situation where the
10:53:54 CRA meetings will become other than what the CRAs were

10:54:00 originally set for.
10:54:02 I hope they understand that.
10:54:03 It was set up for these individual CRAs to come in
10:54:06 and make a report along with their head, Mr. Huey, to
10:54:11 bring a report to this council, to find out what's
10:54:13 going on, what time and what place and what are we
10:54:16 doing with those public funds and how are those
10:54:18 neighborhoods doing?
10:54:20 So for that matter, and I hope you understand, I just
10:54:23 can't support that motion.
10:54:26 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Did I get a second on the motion?
10:54:28 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Yes.
10:54:29 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion and second to waive
10:54:30 the rules.
10:54:31 All in favor of the motion say Aye.
10:54:33 Opposed?
10:54:36 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Tied 3 to 3?
10:54:38 >>THE CLERK: Motion did not carry with Miranda, Miller
10:54:43 and Scott voting no, Caetano being absent at vote.
10:54:51 >> He's back.
10:54:52 Co-break a tie.
10:54:55 >>GWEN MILLER: I understand you want to talk about it.

10:55:05 Like wove explained, this is CRA, to talk about
10:55:08 community development agency.
10:55:09 Anything that's happening in community -- this has
10:55:11 been going a long time but would he have been talking
10:55:13 about that situation in regular City Council meeting.
10:55:15 So I think we need to continue to carry it on to our
10:55:18 regular City Council meeting.
10:55:20 >>> I understand it and I appreciate everything that
10:55:22 you are saying to me.
10:55:23 But there has to be a time and place where we discuss
10:55:26 officer dusty Rhodes.
10:55:30 The conduct of what's occurred with and around him.
10:55:32 >>GWEN MILLER: We will at our next City Council
10:55:36 meeting next Thursday.
10:55:39 >>> Can it be set on the agenda?
10:55:41 >>GWEN MILLER: Yes, I will have it on the agenda.
10:55:43 >>> Thank you, Mrs. Miller.
10:55:44 >>THOMAS SCOTT: And I know you all can't do anything
10:55:48 with it.
10:55:48 That's the problem.
10:55:56 >>GWEN MILLER: Go ahead, Mr. Knott.
10:56:01 >>MOSES KNOTT, JR.: I reside at 2902 East Ellicott

10:56:04 street.
10:56:04 And then I just thank God for his grace and mercy.
10:56:10 A lot of people make it their own job, their own money
10:56:16 and everything but I have God's grace and mercy.
10:56:19 That's the only way I make it.
10:56:20 I want to talk on the CRA meeting.
10:56:24 Now you all have a CRA, I am going to be right there
10:56:26 because I got lots of stuff to talk about.
10:56:32 Now, I want to talk about this East Tampa thing this
10:56:36 morning.
10:56:37 I tell you, I heard a lot of talk this morning about
10:56:42 East Tampa.
10:56:44 But all this talking and all this arguing about who
10:56:48 set in the meeting and all that, somebody said we
10:56:52 ain't got but $500 that you over there to spend over
10:56:55 there.
10:56:56 Then somebody made a statement, poor peoples.
10:57:02 You know, I'm going to represent poor peoples till I
10:57:06 die.
10:57:07 But you all ain't got but $500,000 to spend over
10:57:11 there.
10:57:11 And then they talked this morning about the retention

10:57:14 pond they are going to put on Kennedy.
10:57:16 And then somebody mentioned that they got people
10:57:18 coming from Sarasota to visit east part of Tampa.
10:57:27 Can't have a regular ground park like the other part
10:57:31 of town there.
10:57:32 But the switch about CRA.
10:57:47 Spend money all over, create jobs, highways, roads,
10:57:50 building buildings.
10:57:53 This be morning saying they are going to take the
10:57:55 money and build Central Park with it.
10:57:58 I sit back there and my heart quit beating.
10:58:02 Told me years ago, Mr. Knott, you better watch what
10:58:06 come out of people's mouths because what come out of
10:58:09 their mouth is in their hearts.
10:58:12 Watching TV the other day to hear the government talk
10:58:16 about what money they want to come to the city,
10:58:18 instead of the government, and I said, that's a bad
10:58:20 idea.
10:58:21 And this morning I heard somebody this morning, you
10:58:25 all are going to build a Central Park with it.
10:58:28 But I totally disagree.
10:58:30 Another thing you all talked about this morning is

10:58:32 people coming to the meeting.
10:58:37 I told you all time after time, every time we have a
10:58:40 meeting, there wouldn't be ten people there.
10:58:45 One man came.
10:58:47 I'm going to go out there and talk to our crew.
10:58:51 He ain't got no crew.
10:58:53 I'm going to cut the time off.
10:58:56 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank you, Mr. Knott.
10:58:57 Next speaker.
10:59:02 >>> Good morning, council members.
10:59:04 My name is Connie Bergman.
10:59:08 I would just like to say, I respect the fact that you
10:59:12 all have taken on this responsibility to, you know,
10:59:18 lead this city, lead this community.
10:59:20 And I just wish there was some way that you can come
10:59:25 as a group beyond this podium so we can really see
10:59:31 what's going on in the community.
10:59:33 I think people that's working inside of the most
10:59:38 economically depressed communities have good
10:59:41 intentions.
10:59:41 That is the truth.
10:59:42 But we have been working on this same problem, whether

10:59:48 it was your ban renewal or some other type of
10:59:51 government entity, and the problem still is this.
10:59:56 We have double digit unemployment in East Tampa.
10:59:59 We have 17 schools but many of them are failing
11:00:02 because the children don't see a vision.
11:00:05 They don't see a path of education to one day they are
11:00:08 going to be able to get a job like their fathers,
11:00:11 their cousins, their uncles, because they are all
11:00:14 unemployed.
11:00:15 We have some serious issues.
11:00:17 And I would say the very necessities that you need to
11:00:24 make your family whole, then would you see it for a
11:00:27 community that has been underrepresented.
11:00:30 The fact that our community has had a lot of contrived
11:00:35 plans.
11:00:37 And I can go to one, two, three, four, five, six,
11:00:42 people that are disbursed in the community, many times
11:00:47 when the communities are spectators because they are
11:00:51 not qualified to get the job, public policy, a path to
11:00:57 utilization that follows people forever.
11:01:02 I'm just hoping, I'm just hoping that as you continue
11:01:08 to work diligently as leaders of this city, that if

11:01:13 you don't go to a meeting, drive by and see what's
11:01:19 going on in our community and find out why do we have
11:01:21 so many foreclosed homes inside of that community.
11:01:25 Find out why we have so many people that appear to be
11:01:28 loitering doing nothing because they can't become
11:01:30 employed.
11:01:30 And then let's get the people the head of these
11:01:34 agencies to come and be accountable for their actions.
11:01:38 And I am 100 percent opposed to any money that would
11:01:40 be used to go into Central Park that will make it a
11:01:44 development.
11:01:45 You talk about the element.
11:01:46 You only got 25 residents in a big old wonderful
11:01:50 element in these economic downturns? It takes people
11:01:54 who have vision to see the future, that capitalism as
11:01:57 you know it don't exist anymore.
11:01:59 All around the world, banks have crashed, the
11:02:03 financial crisis has hit everybody, and people are
11:02:06 just asking for the basic necessities to live.
11:02:09 Thank you so much.
11:02:10 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank you.
11:02:11 Would anyone else like to speak?

11:02:12 Okay.
11:02:13 Now we go to our items we need approvals.
11:02:16 Get a motion to approve the following items.
11:02:19 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I move items 4 through 13 on the
11:02:21 agenda.
11:02:21 >> Second.
11:02:22 >>GWEN MILLER: Motion and second.
11:02:23 (Motion carried)
11:02:26 Mr. Huey, do you have anything else you want to
11:02:28 outline?
11:02:29 >>MARK HUEY: No.
11:02:30 I just would like to clarify one item.
11:02:34 I didn't participate in your conversation about the
11:02:36 policy between the CRA and CAC.
11:02:38 But just as a point of information, the board directed
11:02:40 us to share that policy draft with the advisory
11:02:45 committees.
11:02:46 And I want to report to you that we have five of the
11:02:50 seven have reviewed it.
11:02:51 They provided some comments and feedback that we
11:02:55 forwarded to Sal.
11:02:56 The other two we didn't have quorums.

11:02:59 So I just wanted to make you aware of that.
11:03:03 I don't have any further report to give.
11:03:06 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Are you going to share the budget
11:03:09 process with us?
11:03:11 >>MARK HUEY: We'll do that in March if that's okay.
11:03:13 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Okay.
11:03:16 I have a question related to this, and that is, are we
11:03:21 looking ahead at all now that the Strand decision has
11:03:23 been determined toward any kind of bonding?
11:03:27 Or is that in a state of hiatus until the markets
11:03:33 settle down?
11:03:36 >>MARK HUEY: Yes and yes.
11:03:38 Yes, we are working on it.
11:03:40 As Ed reported to you earlier, a key part of the East
11:03:42 Tampa strategic action plan involves a scenario
11:03:47 involving bond financing.
11:03:49 Continue to work on in the downtown.
11:03:50 So, yes, we are in cooperation with Bonnie's office
11:03:53 pursuing it.
11:03:54 But as you have reported, because of the collapse of
11:03:58 the capital market at the present time, there really
11:04:01 isn't a market for such financing.

11:04:03 But worry trying to position ourselves so that when
11:04:05 there is the opportunity to do that type of financing
11:04:08 that we will be in a position to take advantage of it.
11:04:11 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I just passed out to board members
11:04:17 an article called Ponzi state and it's a real
11:04:20 indictment of Florida's entire economy being premised
11:04:23 on growth, which is painfully not a stable place you
11:04:30 would have assumed you would find your financial base.
11:04:33 Looking at that, I want to say that I was sorry I had
11:04:37 to leave last week at noon, but I specifically was
11:04:39 going on a TV show to argue on behalf of the stimulus
11:04:42 package, which I think when all agree we desperately
11:04:45 need.
11:04:46 We are happy that Congress is moving forward.
11:04:48 We recognize the gren jobs are the way of the future,
11:04:50 and the way that this relates to CRA, I wondered if
11:04:54 working with particularly East Tampa, the staff, could
11:04:59 identify the promotion of green jobs being seen as an
11:05:06 investment that he would could marry CRA money with
11:05:11 private sector money and aggressively go after the
11:05:15 creation of green jobs in East Tampa.
11:05:18 And I'm thinking of things like the manufacturer of

11:05:22 solar water heaters, I'm talking about any sorts of
11:05:27 things that might be able to get money from the
11:05:30 stimulus package.
11:05:31 I notice that this was not on the city's list.
11:05:33 But, unfortunately, council members or CRA board
11:05:37 members weren't asked to participate in the
11:05:39 development of the list.
11:05:40 But we are here now as a CRA board, and I think it
11:05:43 would be very appropriate to provide some input some
11:05:48 our Congressmen about what sorts of things we would
11:05:52 like to see on the list of requests for stimulus
11:05:58 package money, and specifically green jobs seems to
11:06:02 really connect with our CRA areas.
11:06:04 So I would like to ask fellow council members if they
11:06:10 have any ideas.
11:06:14 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: My question would be to legal.
11:06:16 I am supportive of -- the question is to legal, that I
11:06:19 am generally supportive of us perhaps as the CRA
11:06:25 having a parallel list or supplementary list from this
11:06:31 agency.
11:06:31 It probably a novel question to you, Sal, and I don't
11:06:36 want to put you on the spot, that may -- I don't know

11:06:41 if we have time.
11:06:42 I guess wove to have time, really, but this is
11:06:46 something we probably really need to look at.
11:06:48 Can we as an independent body authorize under state
11:06:51 statute, can we develop our own list that perhaps
11:06:55 would run parallel or reinforce or --
11:07:01 >> Supplement.
11:07:03 >> May I make a suggestion?
11:07:05 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: From this body alone.
11:07:06 I wouldn't expect you.
11:07:07 >> If I can just clarify what the lists are and make a
11:07:12 recommendation.
11:07:12 First, as you are well aware right now in Washington,
11:07:15 the house and the Senate are collaborating to finalize
11:07:18 the stimulus package.
11:07:20 And the best thing that we can all do is wish them
11:07:23 well and speed to get that all settled in.
11:07:26 And then we will know really what opportunities we
11:07:29 have as a city and a region to take advantage of that
11:07:32 stimulus package.
11:07:33 The list that had been put together were provided to a
11:07:37 variety of groups, the league ever cities and others,

11:07:44 Kathy Castor, those who were involved to try to help
11:07:46 shape the stimulus package in Washington, not in any
11:07:48 way to earmark funds particularly for one thing or
11:07:54 another.
11:07:54 I think what I would like to suggest given that is
11:07:56 that probably by the next board meeting, there should
11:07:58 be much more clarity as to what in fact has occurred
11:08:02 in Washington, and what elements of the stimulus
11:08:05 package might be attractive for redevelopment areas.
11:08:09 So I think if we have that as an item on our agenda
11:08:14 next week, we can give a report.
11:08:19 Next month.
11:08:20 Does that make sense?
11:08:21 >>GWEN MILLER: It makes sense to me.
11:08:28 >>MARY MULHERN: I do want to point out, though, that
11:08:31 there were literally wish lists submitted by the mayor
11:08:34 and by county commissions and MPO.
11:08:41 So I think it kind of beg it is question about whether
11:08:44 the CRA board could give direction, too.
11:08:47 I think that's what Linda is asking.
11:08:55 Yes, they have that direction already.
11:08:57 I think it's worth a pretty lengthy discussion and I

11:09:01 kind of touched on this earlier when I was asking
11:09:04 about the facade loan program, is that we are in a
11:09:12 really, really different economic climate, and the
11:09:14 things that -- not just what we are asking for federal
11:09:18 money for, or help on, but the things that we budged
11:09:22 our own CRA money toward, you know, I think we need to
11:09:27 look at that again and see if we are, you know, if it
11:09:31 makes sense.
11:09:32 And you have to look back and see what mistakes were
11:09:36 made.
11:09:37 And certainly, you know, we were all conflicted in the
11:09:41 housing boom, and the development bubble that went on.
11:09:46 So I think considering that all of our -- because it
11:09:51 takes so long to get these projects and policies in
11:09:54 place, those plans were all made during the boom.
11:09:59 And so we are talking about I know you are going to be
11:10:04 faced to deal with it as far as the budget being so
11:10:06 much less, and then the TIF revenue being so much
11:10:10 less.
11:10:10 But I think it's also a matter of kind of prioritizing
11:10:13 for us, not just what we want out of the stimulus
11:10:16 package, but how we want to go forward as a CRA

11:10:22 district, as CRA districts and what we want to spend
11:10:25 our money on.
11:10:26 So I don't know.
11:10:27 I mean, I'm thinking maybe this needs to be a topic at
11:10:32 our next meeting.
11:10:35 And I'm guessing just kind of broadening a little bit.
11:10:39 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I think that's an excellent
11:10:41 suggestion.
11:10:41 I think the title of the conversation might be,
11:10:48 rethinking our budget under the new economic reality.
11:10:53 Specifically, I think we do need to look at what we
11:10:56 budgeted but would also love to have a recommendation
11:10:59 from staff on opportunities that we see with the
11:11:02 stimulus package.
11:11:03 And I suppose that as our attorney you can say whether
11:11:07 or not -- in what capacity we can weigh in.
11:11:11 But I don't think that it would hurt to make
11:11:14 recommendations on opportunities that we see.
11:11:16 And I think we certainly need to be aggressive and
11:11:20 creative in looking for opportunities to benefit our
11:11:24 CRA areas.
11:11:27 We are all, I think, stunned by the sharp loss in the

11:11:36 economy, and we need to really figure out our next
11:11:42 steps in a strategic way and if we need to put more
11:11:45 time into this, Madam Chairman, I think we should put
11:11:47 that on the last item on our agenda for the CRA
11:11:50 meeting that we work until the time allotted to really
11:11:53 chew on this.
11:11:54 And I would hope that we could get the information in
11:11:57 advance, perhaps, of our budgets, and then the new
11:12:00 projections, perhaps 15% lessening of the next year's
11:12:05 budget so we could start to sort of think
11:12:07 strategically about how best to use the limited
11:12:09 resources we have.
11:12:14 >>GWEN MILLER: Okay.
11:12:15 Anything else?
11:12:18 >>MARY MULHERN: I wanted to just share some good news,
11:12:21 because there's so little.
11:12:23 Our streetcar which operates in many of the CRA
11:12:27 districts had record ridership over the Super Bowl and
11:12:34 Gasparilla weekends.
11:12:35 There were 57,000 rides over those two weekends.
11:12:39 We got great exposure, national exposure with the ESPN
11:12:45 show filming from there, showing our streetcar.

11:12:49 And I think that one of the really interesting things
11:12:52 I heard was people love being in Tampa for the Super
11:12:56 Bowl, all the people who came from out of town.
11:12:58 And their only complaint was transportation and the
11:13:01 difficulty of getting around.
11:13:03 In a car or without a car.
11:13:05 So I think it speaks well for our streetcar system and
11:13:09 for our plans for light rail, but we need to really
11:13:14 focus on that and keep going forward with it.
11:13:17 >>GWEN MILLER: Anything else?
11:13:18 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you very much.
11:13:21 Ms. Mulhern, as our representative on the streetcar
11:13:24 board, is there a plan right now that you all have to
11:13:30 ultimately create a loop, perhaps six months down the
11:13:33 road or eight month could you share with us if there
11:13:36 is?
11:13:36 Because I think it's germane to several of our CRA
11:13:39 districts.
11:13:39 >>MARY MULHERN: Right.
11:13:41 Well, it interesting because the loop was on there
11:13:43 when the street car was designed.
11:13:45 It was a loop.

11:13:46 And now we have the MPO and TBARTA coming up with a
11:13:54 rail plan.
11:13:54 And I have been talking about this a lot and trying to
11:14:00 make people realize that we actually have light rail,
11:14:02 which is the streetcar.
11:14:04 So what's happened is all of that planning seems to
11:14:08 have gone forward without even acknowledging, barely
11:14:13 acknowledging that we have a streetcar, even as far as
11:14:16 using the streetcar as a circulator.
11:14:19 So that's one of the things that I would like to see
11:14:22 the board, historic street car board, put back on the
11:14:26 table, because I don't think -- it not in the current
11:14:30 plans, but part of what's going to happen, I think, is
11:14:34 once we get that little bit of an extension, people
11:14:36 are going to realize it's not far enough and it's got
11:14:38 to at lowest go north and then it might as well hook
11:14:41 up with the rest of it.
11:14:42 So I'm hopeful that we'll put it back in there.
11:14:46 >>GWEN MILLER: Anything else?
11:14:48 >>THE CLERK: Motion to receive and file?
11:14:50 >> So moved.
11:14:50 >> Second.

11:14:51 >>GWEN MILLER: Motion and second.
11:14:52 (Motion carried)
11:14:53 We stand adjourned until 5:01.

The preceding represents an unedited version of
realtime captioning which should neither be relied
upon for complete accuracy nor used as a verbatim
The original of this file was produced in all capital
letters and any variation thereto may be a result of
third party edits and software compatibility issues.
Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the
proceedings may need to hire a court reporter.