Help & information    View the list of Transcripts


Thursday, July 14, 2011
9:00 a.m. Session


This file represents an unedited version of realtime
captioning which should neither be relied upon for
complete accuracy nor used as a verbatim transcript.
The original of this file was produced in all capital
letters and any variation thereto may be a result of
third party edits and software compatibility issues.
Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the
proceedings may need to hire a court reporter.

>> Chairman Pro-Tem: Good morning.

09:04:30 Welcome to Tampa City Council meeting.

09:04:32 This meeting is open to the public.

09:04:34 The Chair yields to Councilmember Cohen to introduce

09:04:41 our presenter of the invocation.

09:04:45 >> Good morning, Council, Madam Chair.

09:04:48 Please join me in welcoming Reverend Cathy Conner,

09:04:52 pastor of First Presbyterian Church of Tampa.

09:04:53 And please rise for the invocation as well as the

09:04:55 Pledge of Allegiance.

09:04:57 >> Please pray with me.

09:04:59 Dear Lord, we give you thanks for choosing each of

09:05:02 these men and women as faithful community servants.

09:05:06 It is with gratitude that I lift them up to you by

09:05:08 name.

09:05:09 Charlie Miranda, Mike Suarez, Yvonne Yolie Capin, Mary

09:05:15 Mulhern, Harry Cohen, Frank Reddick, and Lisa

09:05:20 Montelione.

09:05:20 And ask that you grant them the courage, wisdom and

09:05:23 creativity they will need to lead our city well.

09:05:26 Bless the business of this day and let it be a sign of

09:05:30 your goodness to us all.

09:05:31 Amen.


09:05:50 >> Thank you.

09:05:55 Can we have roll call please?

09:05:57 [Roll Call]

09:05:58 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Here.

09:06:00 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Present.

09:06:01 >>FRANK REDDICK: Here.

09:06:02 >>MARY MULHERN: Here.

09:06:03 >>HARRY COHEN: Here.

09:06:05 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Here.

09:06:08 >> Thank you.

09:06:09 We'll move to the adoption of the minutes.

09:06:15 >> So moved.

09:06:16 >> Second.

09:06:18 >> All in favor?

09:06:19 Aye?

09:06:20 >> Anyone opposed?

09:06:24 This morning, Mrs. Karen Palus, our director of parks

09:06:31 and recreation has some guests here and Councilmember

09:06:34 Suarez is going to introduce them for us.

09:06:40 >> Thank you, Madam Chair.

09:06:44 I'm here to introduce some members of, visitors from

09:06:49 the Commission for Accreditation of Park and Recreation

09:06:51 Agencies.

09:06:52 I had the good pleasure of meeting them a few days ago.

09:06:55 They are Robert Hall, Bob Hall.

09:06:58 He's a retired director and past National Recreation

09:07:01 and Parks Association Board of Trustees, from

09:07:04 St. Louis, Missouri.

09:07:06 Brad Barnes, he's director from Akin County Parks

09:07:09 Recreation and Tourism in Akin, South Carolina.

09:07:11 And Julie, I know I'm going to mispronounce your last

09:07:17 name.

09:07:17 "Paris gondola."

09:07:21 That's close.

09:07:22 She's a business and operations manager from Tacoma,

09:07:26 Washington.

09:07:27 So she came a long way to be here.

09:07:28 I'd like our Council to welcome them and introduce

09:07:31 Karen.

09:07:32 She'll talk a little more about what you're doing.

09:07:35 Thank you.

09:07:38 >> Thank you, Councilmember Suarez.

09:07:40 Honorable Chair, City Council members, I'm pleased to

09:07:43 be here with you all this morning.

09:07:44 July is national parks and recreation month.

09:07:47 We are thrilled our visitors could be here during the

09:07:50 heat of the summer with us, but they've had some great

09:07:53 weather and got a chance to get out and visit a lot of

09:07:55 our great facilities in the City of Tampa.

09:07:57 Just want to share with you real briefly what this

09:08:00 group is here to do.

09:08:02 And why this is so important to the city, to the

09:08:04 department, to the community, and to all the employees

09:08:07 that work very hard throughout our city to bring

09:08:11 quality to parks and recreation programs to our

09:08:13 community.

09:08:13 The Commission for Accreditation of Parks and

09:08:16 Recreation Agencies -- acronym is CAPRA -- sets

09:08:20 standards for national accreditation by providing an

09:08:21 authoritative assessment to parks and recreation

09:08:25 agencies.

09:08:26 With the importance of parks and recreation programs

09:08:29 and services to the quality of life, each agency has an

09:08:32 essential role in the lives of the people it serves.

09:08:35 CAPRA accreditation recognizes parks and recreation

09:08:36 agencies for excellence in operation and service.

09:08:41 It is a quality assurance and quality improvement

09:08:43 process that demonstrates an agency's commitment to its

09:08:46 employees, its volunteers, its patrons and the

09:08:50 community.

09:08:51 We are really proud to have CAPRA with us, our three

09:08:54 visitors.

09:08:54 They have worked very, very hard.

09:08:57 Bob Hall is the lead for the visitation team and he's

09:09:00 done a little over 38 plus, I think he's stopped

09:09:03 counting, on the number of visits that he's been

09:09:05 involved in throughout the nation.

09:09:07 And actually throughout the -- international, because

09:09:09 you've done a lot of the military institutions.

09:09:13 And Julie, about six to eight now?

09:09:18 >> Four.

09:09:21 >> Little over four.

09:09:23 And has got a chance to visit a lot of the different

09:09:25 areas of our country.

09:09:27 And also Brad is our first-timer, and we really

09:09:30 appreciate him coming all the way down and being part

09:09:33 of Tampa.

09:09:33 He actually got the toughest chapters in the group, so,

09:09:36 it's one of those rookie things I think.

09:09:41 We've really had a great time with them this week.

09:09:43 So, finish up their visit with us today.

09:09:45 We'll do our review with them and then they'll take

09:09:48 their information back to the overall accreditation

09:09:51 commission.

09:09:52 And then at November, in their -- at the National

09:09:55 Recreation and Park Association Congress, we'll have an

09:09:58 opportunity to meet before that commission to find out

09:10:01 their final findings.

09:10:03 So, it's been a great time and a great trip.

09:10:05 And we really appreciate their efforts.

09:10:07 This is a volunteer responsibility.

09:10:09 This is not a paid for performance kind of thing within

09:10:12 their job.

09:10:12 So for them to give back to the profession like this is

09:10:14 a very rewarding opportunity.

09:10:18 So I wanted to thank them on behalf of the City of

09:10:20 Tampa and our entire employee force and our community.

09:10:24 Thank you guys, very much.

09:10:30 >> Actually, I'll thank you very much.

09:10:32 We really appreciate it.

09:10:33 They have done a spectacular job getting ready for us,

09:10:37 hosting us while we are here.

09:10:38 I think you can be extremely proud, as you probably all

09:10:41 are, of your community.

09:10:42 I think your park system is really, really great.

09:10:45 And we had an earlier meeting with the Mayor this

09:10:47 morning, I told him, I said the one thing you can be

09:10:50 extremely proud of, regardless of the age of the

09:10:52 facilities we saw since we have been here, they have

09:10:55 all been extremely well maintained.

09:10:57 You can see the effort and love that goes into that.

09:10:59 I think it's reflected back on them certainly and back

09:11:02 on your community.

09:11:02 So, be proud of what you have.

09:11:04 It's really a great system.

09:11:07 >> Also I wanted to recognize my team here from parks

09:11:15 and rec, if you'll please stand.

09:11:15 Those are the folks responsible for compiling all the

09:11:18 information, but for all the 455 plus employees in our

09:11:19 system, they're the ones truly responsible for all the

09:11:22 work that went into providing the services, providing

09:11:24 the documentation and for the quality of our activities

09:11:28 and our facilities out there.

09:11:29 So I thank them and thank Council and our mayor and our

09:11:32 administration for the opportunity to be able to

09:11:35 present our programs and our organization to the

09:11:39 nation.

09:11:41 [ Applause ]

09:11:41 >> Thank you.

09:11:47 And Council would like to welcome you all here.

09:11:50 And I hope you got a chance to experience some of our

09:11:53 water features, to cool off, at Curtis Hixon or Kate

09:11:57 Jackson.

09:11:58 I think Giddens has one too.

09:12:00 It was a tough duty to come here in July.

09:12:04 But we appreciate it and thank you, Karen and to all

09:12:07 the Parks Department people who worked so hard on this

09:12:10 accreditation attempt and good luck with it.

09:12:13 I'm sure that you showed the city off really well in

09:12:15 the Parks Department.

09:12:17 So thank you.

09:12:19 >> Honorable Chair, on behalf of the National Parks and

09:12:21 Recreation, we have a couple visitors with us this

09:12:24 morning.

09:12:25 One of those individuals wanted to say a few words on

09:12:27 behalf of the benefits she and her fellow participants

09:12:30 at the Barksdale Senior Center.

09:12:33 And Gail Greathouse is here on our behalf and their

09:12:37 behalf.

09:12:38 >> Great, thank you.

09:12:39 >> Good morning.

09:12:40 I'm here to give you an update on what's happening at

09:12:44 the Senior Center Barksdale.

09:12:46 And I'm happy to say that things are moving along very

09:12:50 well.

09:12:50 There's changes that are being implemented.

09:12:54 And they're good ones.

09:12:55 And we're getting back some things.

09:12:58 We got back our movies, so we are happy about that.

09:13:00 And we have -- well, we have two socials a month, on

09:13:05 Wednesdays, and we're working towards going back to

09:13:08 four, which I will see what works best, what's going to

09:13:13 attract people to our socials.

09:13:14 And our staff at Barksdale is able to participate more

09:13:18 with us, and we are hoping for even more participation

09:13:21 from them as we go along.

09:13:24 So things are moving along in a very positive

09:13:26 direction, I'm happy to say.

09:13:28 And just to end this, I would like to give out some

09:13:31 thank yous.

09:13:32 I want to thank Karen Palus for implementing the

09:13:37 changes she's been doing and continuing to do.

09:13:41 Want to thank Barry Thomas for stopping by frequently

09:13:45 to see how we are doing and talk to the seniors.

09:13:47 And I want to especially thank Mary Beth Grant for her

09:13:51 total dedication to the seniors at Barksdale.

09:13:54 And of course all the staff at Barksdale is there for

09:13:57 us and we are very happy and we appreciate that.

09:13:59 And last but not least, I want to thank Charlie Miranda

09:14:02 and his aide, Mary Bryant, for helping us and listening

09:14:06 to us, and all of you at the City Council for taking

09:14:09 care of the seniors of this community.

09:14:10 Thank you.

09:14:12 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

09:14:14 [ Applause ]

09:14:21 >> Anything else?

09:14:23 >>MARY MULHERN: Any questions?

09:14:24 Thank you, Karen.

09:14:25 Thanks.

09:14:26 We'll move on to the approval of the agenda.

09:14:46 >>THE CLERK: To review the agenda, to the agenda for

09:14:51 [inaudible]

09:14:54 Under new business item, we have a request from Sonya

09:14:57 Little, chief financial officer, that the county -- the

09:15:03 Council sets the dates and times to hold the two public

09:15:07 hearings on the budget and proposed millage rates as

09:15:12 follows: The first hearing will be Wednesday,

09:15:16 September 7th, 2011 at 5:01 p.m.

09:15:20 The second one will be Wednesday, September 21st, 2011

09:15:25 at 5:01 p.m.

09:15:28 Under substitutions of agenda items, Item 23, we have a

09:15:36 resolution approving the appointment of Jeffrie Hood

09:15:42 Van Loveren to fill the position on the Human Rights

09:15:46 Board.

09:15:48 We have a request for substitution of the resolution to

09:15:52 correct the length of time from two to three years.

09:15:56 We have a continuance review hearing on the petition of

09:16:05 Koto Japanese Steakhouse and Sushi Incorporated.

09:16:08 Julia Cole, Assistant City Attorney, is requesting a

09:16:15 continuance to August 25th, 2011 at 10:30 a.m.

09:16:23 Under items removed from the committee reports,

09:16:27 Councilmember Montelione is requesting items 14 and 35

09:16:31 be removed from the committee reports and be discussed

09:16:35 with staff reports.

09:16:36 And understand you're going to talk about the absences.

09:16:46 >>MARY MULHERN: Yes.

09:16:47 >>THE CLERK: Okay.

09:16:48 Thank you, that's it.

09:16:49 And we request approval of the agenda.

09:16:54 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

09:16:56 First, I'd like to ask Councilman Cohen, our finance

09:17:02 chair, if you'd like to make a motion to schedule those

09:17:06 two budget hearings?

09:17:07 >> So moved.

09:17:08 >> Second.

09:17:09 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor?

09:17:10 Aye?

09:17:11 Anyone opposed?

09:17:13 And we have a memo from Chairman Miranda, please be

09:17:21 advised that I'll be unable to attend the City Council

09:17:23 meeting this Thursday, due to medical reasons.

09:17:28 And I think if we get a motion just to approve that

09:17:40 those -- the addendum.

09:17:44 >> Motion to approve the agenda as amended by Shirley

09:17:48 Foxx-Knowles.

09:17:50 >> Second.

09:17:51 >> Mr. Shelby?

09:17:54 >> Thank you.

09:17:54 Just as a reminder, because Item 61 is set for a public

09:17:58 hearing at 10:30, it will have to -- that item will

09:18:02 have to be taken up at that point.

09:18:04 >>MARY MULHERN: We'll take it up then.

09:18:05 All in favor?

09:18:06 Aye?

09:18:06 Anyone opposed?

09:18:08 Thank you.

09:18:10 We'll now move on to the public comment portion of the

09:18:15 meeting.

09:18:16 We have allotted 30 minutes for anyone in the public to

09:18:21 speak on any matters, other than those set for public

09:18:26 hearing today.

09:18:26 Three minutes per speaker.

09:18:30 And preference shall be given to speakers wishing to

09:18:33 address items on the agenda.

09:18:35 So if you're speaking to something on the agenda,

09:18:38 please come up first.

09:18:40 Thank you.

09:18:40 Please give your name and address.

09:18:42 >> I'm Ed Tillou, I come down here from Sulphur

09:18:49 Springs.

09:18:50 I'm going to try to speak about three things here, and

09:18:53 they actually are on the agenda.

09:18:55 The first thing is about the lawn fertilizer economic

09:18:58 study that Mr. Reddick advocated.

09:19:00 That's very wise, because this is where the

09:19:02 slow-release fertilizer issue can be taken up.

09:19:05 What people need to do is go up to Line Bow, Nebraska,

09:19:11 which of course is not Sulphur Springs, but Castle

09:19:14 Heights.

09:19:15 And look at the stormwater retention thing there.

09:19:17 It's like pea soup, which interestingly enough, that's

09:19:21 from the Netherlands and you see, their waterways and

09:19:25 their ponds and everything, oftentimes is green, solid

09:19:29 green.

09:19:29 But you can go up to Line Bow, Nebraska and if you go

09:19:32 up there during a rain storm, you'll see the street

09:19:35 closed with the water coming out.

09:19:36 Because its drainage is being clogged up by this algae.

09:19:40 You might actually have to go in and remove the top two

09:19:43 inches that's clogged with this algae because algicide

09:19:48 will kill it and it will still be there.

09:19:52 It's very important, this slow-release fertilizer, even

09:19:55 though it isn't the Yuppie theme, get the nitrogen out,

09:20:01 which actually one of the county commissioners has

09:20:02 picked up on.

09:20:03 Now, I don't know whether she slept through her biology

09:20:06 classes, but it's covered like hey, if you don't have

09:20:09 nitrogen, you don't have growth and you don't have

09:20:12 things living.

09:20:12 So it's not nitrogen.

09:20:14 It is nitrate salts, which actually are very

09:20:17 interesting.

09:20:17 There's a vested interest.

09:20:19 You don't want nitrate salts out there, because it can

09:20:22 be made into explosives.

09:20:24 I was in Madison, Wisconsin after the Army research

09:20:29 center was bombed.

09:20:30 It took out a whole building.

09:20:32 It was a fertilizer and fuel oil bomb.

09:20:34 And it worked very well.

09:20:35 Somebody was in the building, they got killed.

09:20:40 And one of the sad things they say is that the older

09:20:43 guy was just kind of tagging along.

09:20:45 It was the young people that were the brains of the

09:20:47 operation and they got 10 or 15 years in jail.

09:20:50 But the older guy got about 20 or 25 and he was just

09:20:54 tagging along.

09:20:55 He was not the brains of the operation.

09:20:56 So what you want to get out is nitrate salts.

09:20:59 And the place to do this is this economic study,

09:21:03 because like if you exempt slow-release fertilizer, you

09:21:09 might have a couple three more people working during

09:21:14 the rainy season, but more importantly, maybe people

09:21:18 will fertilize their lawns half as much and pay twice

09:21:22 as much to do it.

09:21:23 There's some kind of tradeoff there.

09:21:25 So, that won't be going into the water, won't be ending

09:21:28 up on Line Bow in Nebraska.

09:21:30 Second item, I hope I can get into is misuse of red

09:21:34 light cameras.

09:21:35 When they have fines of $160 rather than 70 or 80,

09:21:39 because they're not being applied to the right thing,

09:21:41 which is turning cars.

09:21:43 They can be facilitated with bounce stops, which is

09:21:47 another California idea.

09:21:48 There was a lot of argument --

09:21:51 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you, sir, your time's up.

09:21:53 >> Okay.

09:21:53 Well, I guess I get one item each time.

09:22:03 >> Good morning, Madam Chair.

09:22:05 This is an off agenda item, so if there are other

09:22:09 people, they're speaking on an agenda item, I'll be

09:22:11 more than happy to defer.

09:22:13 If not, may I continue?

09:22:17 >>MARY MULHERN: Yes.

09:22:18 >> Thank you very much.

09:22:18 Good morning, Madam Chair, members of Council.

09:22:22 This is my first visit here since you all had your

09:22:25 successful campaigns and won the seats you sit in and I

09:22:27 personally congratulate you.

09:22:28 I'm here this morning to talk about sidewalks.

09:22:32 I'm not here to request, I'm not here to complain.

09:22:34 I'm here to say thanks.

09:22:36 Pass out some attaboys if you would.

09:22:40 Where I come, an attaboy is a thanks for a job well

09:22:44 done.

09:22:44 Those of you here in February, I was down here twice

09:22:47 requesting my sidewalk, the missing sidewalk on Lois

09:22:51 south to Pearl and on around to Manhattan.

09:22:54 And I'm happy to say, they are done.

09:22:56 They're done.

09:22:58 So I'd like to pass an attaboy to the previous Council.

09:23:02 To Mr. Daignault, who stood right where I'm standing

09:23:06 and assured Chairman Scott and me that I would get my

09:23:10 sidewalks, or we would.

09:23:11 It's done.

09:23:11 Also to Herb Lee and Jim Washington, and last but not

09:23:19 least, the contractor, DBE&C.

09:23:22 This is the second project they've done in our

09:23:24 neighborhood.

09:23:25 And having spent 35 years in construction, I can tell

09:23:29 you that they have done a very, very fine job and I

09:23:33 would certainly ask the administration that if these

09:23:36 people remain competitive, that they continue to use

09:23:39 them.

09:23:39 One last thing.

09:23:41 Thank public works, the fine job they did at the

09:23:44 railroad crossings at Pearl, Iowa, Manhattan.

09:23:48 Those sidewalks are in, the crossings are in.

09:23:52 I realize it's difficult sometimes to work with CSX.

09:23:55 Because time frame, they don't always look at their

09:23:58 watch.

09:23:59 But all those are done and I just want to thank public

09:24:01 works and all the people involved.

09:24:03 Thank you very much, Madam Chair.

09:24:05 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you very much.

09:24:15 >> Good morning.

09:24:19 Jeff Davis, from Treasure Island, Florida.

09:24:21 And I'm an employee of the United States Tennis

09:24:24 Association.

09:24:24 Who wants good news today?

09:24:26 Thank you, Council.

09:24:31 And Madam Chair.

09:24:32 We live in difficult times.

09:24:35 With budget cuts, childhood obesity, and I bring good

09:24:39 news.

09:24:39 The United States Tennis Association has a broad

09:24:43 sweeping initiative that's going to change the

09:24:45 landscape of tennis for kids ten and under.

09:24:48 The ten and under tennis initiative is a national

09:24:52 initiative.

09:24:53 The USDA has committed ten million dollars to

09:24:56 communities across the country, including the Tampa

09:24:58 area, we have committed $100,000 over the next three

09:25:02 years to provide resources for things like programming,

09:25:08 marketing, equipment, and training.

09:25:12 We have begun a partnership with the City of Tampa

09:25:15 parks and recreation department.

09:25:16 That will see these to fruition.

09:25:20 Our goal is create a pathway for kids ten and under to

09:25:24 get into the sport of tennis and continue along that

09:25:26 path through their childhood.

09:25:28 We have entered into a partnership, when I say we, the

09:25:32 United States Tennis Association, the governing body of

09:25:35 tennis in the United States.

09:25:36 And its arm, the USTA Florida section.

09:25:39 We have created partnerships in this community,

09:25:43 including the school district of Hillsborough County,

09:25:44 the Hillsborough County Tennis Association and the

09:25:47 largest ten and under tennis facility in the state of

09:25:51 Florida, it's the tennis facility on the campus of

09:25:54 Hillsborough Community College, Dale Mabry campus.

09:25:57 We'd like to continue that partnership.

09:26:00 You have before you a document, a partnership agreement

09:26:02 that will solidify our partnership and the commitment

09:26:06 on both parties for growing the sport of tennis in ten

09:26:09 and under tennis.

09:26:11 The initiative itself, it provides an entirely

09:26:14 different play format for kids.

09:26:16 Smaller courts, smaller rackets.

09:26:18 Various types of tennis balls for them, new scoring

09:26:22 format.

09:26:23 We currently have 17 of the City of Tampa parks and rec

09:26:27 sites that are delivering a ten and under tennis

09:26:30 program that began this summer.

09:26:31 We are proud of that and look forward to continuing

09:26:33 that partnership and very much look forward to your

09:26:35 approval of this partnership document.

09:26:37 Thank you.

09:26:39 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

09:26:39 Any other public comments this morning?

09:26:45 We'll move on to -- are there any requests by the

09:26:54 public for reconsideration of legislative matters?

09:26:58 Seeing none, we'll move on to our committee reports.

09:27:08 And consent agenda items.

09:27:14 Starting with public safety, Councilman Reddick.

09:27:17 >>FRANK REDDICK: Madam Chair, move items 3 through 5.

09:27:21 >> Second.

09:27:21 >> All in favor?

09:27:23 >> Aye.

09:27:24 Anyone opposed?

09:27:30 >> Parks and recreation, Councilmember Montelione, if

09:27:33 you could move those items?

09:27:35 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Madam Chair, I moves items 6 through

09:27:39 ten.

09:27:39 >> Second.

09:27:40 >> All in favor?

09:27:40 Aye?

09:27:41 Anyone opposed?

09:27:44 Councilman Suarez, public works committee?

09:27:47 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I move items 11 through 13 and items 15

09:27:51 through 21.

09:27:56 >>MARY MULHERN: Item 14 will be moved to staff reports.

09:27:59 All in favor?

09:28:00 Aye?

09:28:01 Anyone opposed?

09:28:02 Move on to the finance committee.

09:28:06 Councilman Cohen?

09:28:08 >>HARRY COHEN: Madam Chair, I moves items 22, 23, and

09:28:11 24.

09:28:12 >> Second.

09:28:12 >> All in favor?

09:28:13 Anyone opposed?

09:28:15 We'll move to buildings, zoning and preservation.

09:28:18 Councilwoman Montelione?

09:28:20 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Madam Chair, I move items 25 through

09:28:22 34 and 36 through 39.

09:28:25 >> Second.

09:28:27 >> All in favor?

09:28:28 Aye?

09:28:29 Anyone opposed?

09:28:31 Item 35 will be heard under staff reports.

09:28:35 Move on to transportation committee.

09:28:39 Councilwoman Capin?

09:28:41 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Thank you, Madam Chair.

09:28:42 I move item 40 and 41.

09:28:45 >> Second.

09:28:45 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor?

09:28:46 Aye?

09:28:47 Anyone opposed?

09:28:49 And we need to set the items for public hearing,

09:28:55 Councilman Cohen, if you could move those.

09:28:57 >>HARRY COHEN: Madam Chair, move items 42 through 46.

09:29:06 >>> Second.

09:29:06 >> All in favor?

09:29:08 Anyone opposed?

09:29:14 >>MARY MULHERN: It is 9:30.

09:29:16 So I believe we can move to our 9:30 public hearings.

09:29:20 Second readings on proposed ordinances.

09:29:24 Need a motion to open items 47 and 48.

09:29:30 >> So moved.

09:29:31 >> Second.

09:29:32 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor?

09:29:33 Aye?

09:29:33 Anyone opposed?

09:29:35 Councilwoman Montelione?

09:29:40 If you could read number 47?

09:29:45 >>LISA MONTELIONE: I move an ordinance being presented

09:29:46 for second reading and adoption, an ordinance of the

09:29:49 City of Tampa, Florida amending Tampa code of

09:29:51 ordinances chapter 15, parking, adding provisions to

09:29:55 allow for electronic form of payment for parking

09:29:57 meters, amending section 15-56, adding new section

09:30:01 relating to electrical vehicle charging station

09:30:05 parking.

09:30:05 >> Second.

09:30:07 >> Repealing all ordinances or parts of ordinances in

09:30:08 conflict therewith, providing for severability,

09:30:11 providing an effective date.

09:30:15 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

09:30:16 Before we vote, I'd like to ask if there's anyone from

09:30:18 the public who wishes to speak on this item?

09:30:20 Seeing none, all in favor?

09:30:26 >> You need to close.

09:30:28 >> Motion to close.

09:30:29 >> Second.

09:30:30 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor?

09:30:32 Aye.

09:30:33 All in favor of the motion?

09:30:35 >> Vote and record.

09:30:38 >> Please vote and record.

09:30:50 >> Motion carried with Miranda being absent.

09:30:57 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

09:30:57 These aren't showing on our screen.

09:31:03 Is it showing for you?

09:31:05 >> Yes.

09:31:06 >> Here we go.

09:31:08 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

09:31:09 Item 48, is there anyone who wishes to speak on this

09:31:15 ordinance?

09:31:15 Seeing none, as for motion to close, public hearing on

09:31:24 item 48.

09:31:25 >> So moved.

09:31:25 >> Second.

09:31:26 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor?

09:31:28 Aye?

09:31:29 Councilman Cohen, if you could read item 48.

09:31:34 >>HARRY COHEN: I move ordinance being presented for

09:31:35 second reading and adoption, an ordinance granting to

09:31:37 the university of Tampa Incorporated, a Florida

09:31:39 non-profit corporation, its successors and assigns, a

09:31:42 nonexclusive franchise to use the public streets,

09:31:45 alleys, highways, waterways, bridges, easements and

09:31:49 other public places of the City of Tampa for the

09:31:51 construction, maintenance and operation of chiller

09:31:54 lines, including all necessary appurtenances for the

09:31:57 delivery and return of chilled water for the University

09:31:59 of Tampa, in the City of Tampa and prescribing the

09:32:02 terms and conditions under which said nonexclusive

09:32:05 franchise may be exercised, providing for severability,

09:32:08 providing an effective date.

09:32:11 >>MARY MULHERN: Is there a second?

09:32:12 >> Second.

09:32:13 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor

09:32:16 -- vote and record.

09:32:36 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Miranda being absent.

09:32:40 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

09:32:41 We'll move on to public hearings, second readings,

09:32:49 quasi-judicial items.

09:32:51 If we could have a motion to open items 49 through 52.

09:33:00 >> So moved.

09:33:02 >> Second.

09:33:03 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor?

09:33:04 Aye?

09:33:05 Anyone opposed?

09:33:07 And at this time, I would ask for anyone who wishes to

09:33:11 speak on any of these -- any items today, and

09:33:16 especially items 49 through 52, to please stand and be

09:33:20 sworn in.

09:33:24 [Oath administered by Clerk]

09:33:32 >> Mr. Shelby?

09:33:34 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Thank you.

09:33:35 Council, I ask that all written material that has been

09:33:38 available for public inspection in City Council's

09:33:40 office be received and filed into the record at this

09:33:42 time by motion, please.

09:33:44 >> So moved.

09:33:45 >> Second.

09:33:46 >> All in favor?

09:33:48 Anyone opposed?

09:33:49 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Thank you.

09:33:50 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

09:33:51 We'll move to item number 49.

09:33:53 Councilman Reddick?

09:33:58 Is there anyone who wishes to speak on item number 49?

09:34:02 Seeing none.

09:34:04 >>FRANK REDDICK: Thank you, Madam Chair.

09:34:05 Move to adopt --

09:34:09 >> I'm sorry.

09:34:11 Councilwoman Capin.

09:34:12 >> We need a motion to close.

09:34:14 >> Move to close.

09:34:17 >> Second.

09:34:18 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor?

09:34:20 Thank you.

09:34:25 >>FRANK REDDICK: Move to adopt ordinance being

09:34:26 presented for second reading, an ordinance vacating,

09:34:29 closing, discontinuing, abandoning a certain

09:34:31 right-of-way, all that portion of York Street south of

09:34:33 McKay Street, north of Cumberland Street, east of

09:34:36 Channelside Drive and west of Ybor Channel, in the City

09:34:40 of Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida, the same being

09:34:43 more fully described in section 2 hereof, subject to

09:34:47 certain easements, covenants, conditions and

09:34:49 restrictions, as more particularly described herein,

09:34:52 providing an effective date.

09:34:56 >> Second?

09:34:57 >> Second.

09:34:58 >> All in favor?

09:34:59 Vote and record.

09:35:11 >> Motion carried with Miranda being absent.

09:35:16 >>MARY MULHERN: Item number 50.

09:35:18 Is there anyone in the public who wishes to speak on

09:35:21 this item?

09:35:22 Can I get a motion to close?

09:35:26 >> So moved.

09:35:28 >> Second.

09:35:29 >> All in favor?

09:35:31 Aye?

09:35:31 And Councilwoman Capin, if you could read that.

09:35:37 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Yes, Chairwoman.

09:35:39 An ordinance being presented for second reading and

09:35:41 adoption, an ordinance vacating, closing, discontinuing

09:35:44 and abandoning a certain right-of-way all that east,

09:35:48 west alleyway lying south of north Bay Street, north of

09:35:51 Ida Street, east of 22nd Street, and west of

09:35:54 24th street, in Progreso subdivision in the City of

09:35:58 Tampa, Florida, the same being more fully described in

09:36:00 section 2 hereof, providing an effective date.

09:36:05 >> Second.

09:36:07 >>MARY MULHERN: Please vote and record.

09:36:18 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Miranda being absent.

09:36:22 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

09:36:23 Item 51, is there anyone in the public who wishes to

09:36:28 speak on this?

09:36:29 >> Joel Sousa, land development.

09:36:33 Here to state that V11-184 is planted and certified.

09:36:36 Here to answer any questions.

09:36:37 Same applies to V11-197.

09:36:41 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

09:36:42 We have a motion to close item 51?

09:36:50 >> So moved.

09:36:51 >> Second.

09:36:52 >> All in favor?

09:36:53 Anyone opposed?

09:36:55 Councilman Suarez?

09:36:57 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I move an ordinance being presented for

09:36:59 second reading and adoption, an ordinance approving a

09:37:02 special use permit, S-2 for alcoholic beverage sales,

09:37:06 small venue and making lawful the sale of beverages

09:37:08 containing alcohol of more than one percent by weight

09:37:10 and not more than 14% by weight and wines regardless of

09:37:13 alcoholic content, beer and wine, 2(COP) for

09:37:19 consumption on premises and in sealed containers for

09:37:22 consumption off premises at or from that certain lot,

09:37:25 plot or tract of land located at 1702, 1704, and 1716

09:37:30 North Howard Avenue, Tampa, Florida, as more

09:37:33 particularly described in section 2 hereof, providing

09:37:37 for repeal of all ordinances in conflict, providing an

09:37:38 effective date.

09:37:38 >> Second.

09:37:44 >> Motion made by Councilman Suarez, seconded by

09:37:48 Councilman Reddick.

09:37:49 Please vote and record.

09:38:07 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Miranda being absent.

09:38:13 >>MARY MULHERN: Item number 52, is there anyone who

09:38:15 wishes to speak on this item?

09:38:17 Seeing no one, can I have a motion to close?

09:38:22 >> Move to close.

09:38:23 >> Second.

09:38:25 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor?

09:38:27 Aye.

09:38:27 Anyone opposed?

09:38:29 Councilwoman Montelione, if you could read that?

09:38:42 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Item number 52.

09:38:43 Ordinance being presented for second reading and

09:38:47 adoption, an ordinance approving special use permit S-2

09:38:50 for alcoholic beverage sales, small venue and making

09:38:53 lawful the sale of beverages regardless of alcoholic

09:38:56 content, beer wine and liquor, 3PS, in sealed

09:39:00 containers for consumption off premises, only at or

09:39:05 from that certain lot, plot, or tract of land located

09:39:08 at 3434 West Columbus Drive, unit 105, Tampa, Florida,

09:39:12 as more particularly described in section 2 hereof,

09:39:15 providing for repeal of all ordinances in conflict,

09:39:16 providing an effective date.

09:39:19 >> Second.

09:39:22 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor -- everyone please vote

09:39:25 and record.

09:39:25 I need to revote.

09:39:37 I voted wrong.

09:39:38 Thank you.

09:39:53 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Mulhern and Cohen

09:39:56 voting no and Miranda being absent.

09:40:03 >>MARY MULHERN: I think we need to have a motion to

09:40:06 open 53 and 54.

09:40:10 Is that correct?

09:40:12 >> Madam Chair, respectfully, that cannot be taken up

09:40:15 until 10:00 a.m.

09:40:16 The remaining public hearings take place 10:00 a.m. and

09:40:21 after.

09:40:22 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay.

09:40:23 Well.

09:40:24 We're running early.

09:40:27 >> Madam Chair, may I ask question of the, our counsel?

09:40:36 >>MARY MULHERN: Yes.

09:40:37 >> Can we open up staff reports for, even though they

09:40:41 put 10:00 a.m. certain, is that possible?

09:40:45 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Yes, that is possible.

09:40:46 There's no legal requirement that says they can't be

09:40:49 taken up.

09:40:49 However, I just wish to bring to Council's attention a

09:40:53 concern that when the public sees that, and this is

09:40:56 something we may have to address with Chairman Miranda

09:40:58 when he returns, the fact it says time certain, there

09:41:01 may be members of the public who would anticipate it

09:41:03 would not be taken up before then.

09:41:05 So, my suggestion would be if it's, particularly if

09:41:09 it's an issue of a particular Council, if it's okay

09:41:13 with that Councilmember to take up that item in

09:41:15 advance, or wishes to hold it, that would be their

09:41:19 prerogative.

09:41:19 It's the prerogative of Council, but just a caution,

09:41:22 that is a concern, there may be people in the public

09:41:27 who would not anticipate it being taken up sooner.

09:41:30 That is something we can suggest.

09:41:33 >>MARY MULHERN: I suggest at this point, we move to new

09:41:35 business, that way we won't have to worry about that.

09:41:37 We'll take care of new business in the meantime.

09:41:42 We may get to 10:00 or we can have a very short break.

09:41:48 I'm guessing that there is some new business.

09:41:52 >> Madam Chair, I have new business.

09:41:54 I would like to amend a motion that I had made for a

09:42:02 workshop for the efficiency workshop that is scheduled.

09:42:05 I'd like to invite audit.

09:42:08 I've spoken with our audit staff internally, and they

09:42:12 had expressed a desire to be here to be speaking to

09:42:16 that item in September.

09:42:18 I believe is the workshop.

09:42:19 So it's just to add audit to the list of invitees to

09:42:26 that workshop.

09:42:28 >>MARY MULHERN: And the clerk, you have that date?

09:42:37 >> Second.

09:42:37 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor?

09:42:40 Aye.

09:42:44 >> 10:30 on September 15.

09:42:46 >> The second piece of new business, and this is not a

09:42:49 motion, but just for folks to have this on their radar.

09:42:52 The motion to bring the Lightning here for recognition

09:42:55 of their achievements this past season.

09:43:01 The staff of the Lightning mentioned August 25th might

09:43:04 be a good date with them.

09:43:06 Still working with them.

09:43:07 Waiting for some of the players to return to town and

09:43:09 some of the coaching staff, so as soon as we get a

09:43:12 solid date, I will make that known.

09:43:14 But we're looking at August 25th at this point.

09:43:18 >>MARY MULHERN: So you want to wait?

09:43:20 >> Informational item.

09:43:21 >>MARY MULHERN: Thanks.

09:43:21 Anything else?

09:43:23 >> That's it.

09:43:25 >>MARY MULHERN: Councilman Cohen?

09:43:31 Councilwoman Capin?

09:43:33 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I have two.

09:43:34 First of all, today is July 14th.

09:43:36 I want to acknowledge tomorrow, July 15th is the

09:43:40 124th anniversary of the City of Tampa.

09:43:42 So we won't be here, so I want to say happy

09:43:48 anniversary.

09:43:48 City is getting up there in age.

09:43:53 [ Laughter ]

09:43:55 >> We need to make plans for 125.

09:43:57 Thank you.

09:44:00 I'd like to make a motion to allow a presentation to

09:44:07 Council for a plan of alternatives to incarceration of

09:44:12 street solicitors in the event that street solicitation

09:44:15 ordinance is passed by City Council August 4th.

09:44:19 A group of citizens have been researching and working

09:44:21 on this issue, and I ask that we give them ten minutes

09:44:25 to present their plan for creating a citizens task

09:44:29 force.

09:44:29 I would ask for ten minutes at 9:00 a.m.

09:44:33 >> Second.

09:44:36 >> August 4th.

09:44:38 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor?

09:44:40 Aye?

09:44:41 Anything else?

09:44:44 >>YVONNE CAPIN: That's it.

09:44:47 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Councilman Suarez?

09:44:49 >>MIKE SUAREZ: No new business.

09:44:51 >>MARY MULHERN: We are really speedy today.

09:44:53 >> Madam Chair, I move that we have a short recess

09:44:55 until 10:00 a.m.

09:44:57 >> Second.

09:44:58 >> Great.

09:44:58 All in favor?

09:45:00 Aye.

09:45:00 We'll be back at 10:00 a.m.

09:45:02 [RECESS]

10:01:46 >>MARY MULHERN: Call to order for 10:00 public

10:01:49 hearings.

10:01:50 We'll need a motion to open the public hearing.

10:01:59 >>THE CLERK: We need to have roll call.

10:02:01 >> A roll call vote please.

10:02:02 Roll call, please.

10:02:05 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Here.

10:02:06 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Present.

10:02:07 >>FRANK REDDICK: Here.

10:02:08 >>MARY MULHERN: Here.

10:02:09 >>HARRY COHEN: Here.

10:02:13 >>MARY MULHERN: If we could have a motion to open items

10:02:18 53 and 54.

10:02:19 >> So moved.

10:02:20 >> Second.

10:02:21 >> All in favor?

10:02:22 Aye.

10:02:23 Any opposed?

10:02:24 And we will go to item 53.

10:02:33 >> Good morning, Council.

10:02:34 Ron Vila, staff for historic preservation.

10:02:37 I have not been sworn.

10:02:39 >>MARY MULHERN: If everyone, anyone who wishes to speak

10:02:42 on any item, could please stand and be sworn in.

10:02:47 Any of our 10:00 items.

10:02:55 [Oath administered by Clerk]

10:03:00 >> Item 53 is here for an ad valorem tax exception.

10:03:05 This is a residential structure at 2105 Marjory Avenue

10:03:10 in the Hyde Park Historic District and owned by James

10:03:13 Blackwood.

10:03:14 This is a photo prior to rehabilitation.

10:03:18 This is the front porch that was enclosed.

10:03:23 Improperly.

10:03:23 And you see the canopies that were in existence prior

10:03:27 to rehabilitation.

10:03:27 This is a photo that was taken after rehabilitation.

10:03:33 This was reviewed and approved by the Architectural

10:03:36 Review Commission.

10:03:37 This is just another shot of the front entryway.

10:03:42 Leading to the front door.

10:03:44 And after rehabilitation, you see of the character

10:03:51 defining features, the casement windows on the porch,

10:03:54 the transom over the period door.

10:03:57 The piers and the columns.

10:03:59 Moving to the side elevation, this request did

10:04:09 encompass an addition, if you look in the next photo,

10:04:12 there will be an addition here of a two-story structure

10:04:15 that was sensibly done.

10:04:18 Which is indicated in this photo here.

10:04:20 So this was the primary structure.

10:04:22 And then at this point, was the addition.

10:04:25 Moving to the interior, shows some of the woodwork and

10:04:32 the decay of the period wood.

10:04:35 And then after rehabilitation.

10:04:44 This was the same wood, it was brought out.

10:04:46 It was crafted and brought out.

10:04:48 And then you see the banding that was put in place.

10:04:51 Some of the period hardware that was prior to

10:04:56 rehabilitation, you see the push knobs, the door and

10:05:00 the crystal knobs.

10:05:01 And then much research was done in the renovation to

10:05:06 the interior to bring it back to its craftsman look, to

10:05:10 the hammered hardware here, with the levers.

10:05:14 And lastly on this residential structure is the

10:05:17 fireplace.

10:05:20 And the condition prior to rehabilitation.

10:05:23 And then after rehabilitation.

10:05:25 The implement of the ceramic tile that's very period

10:05:31 for the craftsman style.

10:05:33 So this structure was reviewed and the interior and

10:05:38 exterior, it met the secretary of interior standards

10:05:40 and was approved by the ARC commission.

10:05:44 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

10:05:45 Will you take up item 54 now?

10:05:55 We need to approve...

10:05:58 Does anyone wish to speak on item 53?

10:06:02 Any questions from Council?

10:06:06 Motion to close?

10:06:10 >> Second.

10:06:11 >> All in favor?

10:06:12 Aye.

10:06:13 Councilman Cohen, could you read item 53?

10:06:21 >>HARRY COHEN: I move an ordinance being presented for

10:06:22 first reading consideration, an ordinance approving an

10:06:25 historic preservation property exemption application

10:06:28 relative to the restoration, renovation, rehabilitation

10:06:32 of certain property owned by James E. Blackwood,

10:06:36 located at 2105 Marjory Avenue, Tampa, Florida in the

10:06:40 Hyde Park Historic District based on certain findings,

10:06:43 providing for notice to the property appraiser of

10:06:45 Hillsborough County, providing for severability,

10:06:48 providing for repeal of all ordinances in conflict,

10:06:49 providing an effective date.

10:06:52 >> Second.

10:06:55 >> Motion made by Councilman Cohen, seconded by

10:07:00 Councilman Suarez.

10:07:01 All in favor?

10:07:02 Aye.

10:07:02 Anyone opposed?

10:07:05 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Miranda being absent.

10:07:07 Second reading of the ordinance will be held July the

10:07:10 28th at 9:30 a.m.

10:07:14 >>MARY MULHERN: Item 54.

10:07:15 >> Item 54 is also for ad valorem tax exemption.

10:07:18 This is a commercial structure located within the Ybor

10:07:21 City Historic District.

10:07:22 The address is 1315-7th Avenue, known as the Sans Souci

10:07:27 Building.

10:07:28 If we could go to the Elmo.

10:07:30 This is a shot from the early 1900s.

10:07:34 You see the sign here indicating the Sans Souci.

10:07:39 And you see the pedestrian scale of the building, how

10:07:41 it respects the sidewalk.

10:07:42 This building was constructed in 1906.

10:07:48 It was very important in the infancy of Ybor City.

10:07:52 It housed a penny arcade, it housed a telegraph office,

10:07:57 a bowling alley, Ybor City loan office, a tailor, Wolf

10:08:03 Brothers department store was in this building, as well

10:08:05 as a barber shop.

10:08:07 A general store, a movie theater, and then lastly, the

10:08:11 Babcock furniture store was in here.

10:08:14 This was, as I stated, in the early 1900s.

10:08:20 This is a photo in 1980.

10:08:24 Prior to rehabilitation, and then how it appears today.

10:08:30 This is another angle of that same storefront, showing

10:08:38 the display windows on the sidewalk level, and then the

10:08:43 two-story window casings.

10:08:46 As you move around, a series of photos to the rear

10:08:49 elevation.

10:08:50 And how it appears today, to let some natural light in

10:08:57 for the offices.

10:08:58 Moving to the interior, prior to rehabilitation, it was

10:09:04 in a deteriorated state.

10:09:06 And once again, this is a series of photos of the

10:09:12 interior prior to rehabilitation.

10:09:13 And then how it appears today.

10:09:16 Bringing back the luster of the baseboards, the smooth

10:09:25 stucco only the interior, the display windows and the

10:09:29 transom, the schoolhouse lighting, that's very period.

10:09:33 Looking out one of the display windows.

10:09:41 Accessibility from the first floor to the second floor.

10:09:53 Once you get into the hallway, the second floor, very

10:09:56 tasteful rehabilitation.

10:09:58 And this request also meets the secretary of interior

10:10:02 standards.

10:10:03 Thank you.

10:10:06 >>MARY MULHERN: It's beautiful.

10:10:07 What's the use?

10:10:11 Or are there various uses?

10:10:13 >> There's various uses, offices, a pharmacy on the

10:10:17 first floor and offices on the second floor.

10:10:19 It's almost completely occupied.

10:10:21 They have, I believe, approximately 30,000 square foot,

10:10:24 so brings back a little vibrancy to Ybor City.

10:10:27 >>MARY MULHERN: That's great that we have offices and

10:10:30 retail pharmacy there.

10:10:31 Wonderful.

10:10:33 Anyone else wish to speak on this?

10:10:38 Need a motion to close.

10:10:39 >> So moved.

10:10:42 >> Second.

10:10:42 >> Motion made by Councilman Suarez, seconded by

10:10:48 Councilwoman Capin.

10:10:49 All in favor?

10:10:50 Aye.

10:10:50 Councilman Reddick, could you read item 54?

10:10:55 >>FRANK REDDICK: Yes, Madam Chair.

10:10:56 Move ordinance being presented for first reading, first

10:11:00 reading consideration.

10:11:02 Order approving historic residential property tax

10:11:05 exemption, application relative to restoration,

10:11:08 renovation or rehabilitation of certain Property Owned

10:11:11 by Ybor City Property Group, LLC, located at 1315 east

10:11:16 seventh avenue, Tampa, Florida, in the Ybor City

10:11:18 Historic District, based upon certain findings,

10:11:23 providing for notice to the property appraiser in

10:11:25 Hillsborough County, providing for severability,

10:11:29 providing for repeal of all ordinances in conflict,

10:11:29 providing an effective date.

10:11:30 >> Second.

10:11:34 >> Motion made by Councilman Reddick, seconded by

10:11:38 Councilman Suarez.

10:11:40 All in favor?

10:11:41 Aye.

10:11:42 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Miranda being absent.

10:11:44 Second reading of the ordinance will be held July the

10:11:47 14th -- I'm sorry, July the 28th at 9:30 a.m.

10:11:55 >> We'll now move to our 10:00 a.m. staff reports.

10:11:58 Item 55.

10:12:01 Councilman Cohen.

10:12:07 >>HARRY COHEN: I had originally continued this from

10:12:09 three weeks ago, due to some concerns that were brought

10:12:12 up to me by the Port Tampa City Civic Association.

10:12:16 Since that time, I have met with them.

10:12:19 And they have shifted from opposition to this project

10:12:23 to now being comfortable with it.

10:12:27 They had some questions.

10:12:28 They wanted those questions answered.

10:12:30 The staff of the city, both transportation and real

10:12:33 estate, have been very helpful in answering their

10:12:37 questions and I'm pleased to go ahead and move it

10:12:39 forward.

10:12:39 I wanted to also mention that part of our discussion

10:12:43 about this particular site, there were really two

10:12:47 things that the neighborhood brought up.

10:12:48 One was that they were interested in seeing if there

10:12:51 was an alternative site available that's now owned by

10:12:54 the school board.

10:12:55 That site was looked into.

10:12:57 The school board is not able -- it's part of their

10:13:01 long-range plan to put an elementary school there.

10:13:03 They actually spent some money working with an

10:13:05 architect to see if there was a way that the city could

10:13:08 use that site in conjunction with the school site.

10:13:11 That is not going to be able to take place.

10:13:13 The second thing that came up was regarding the price.

10:13:17 And little bit of research on the history of this

10:13:20 property shows that it sold in 2005 for over

10:13:24 $3 million.

10:13:24 It is now appraised at over $2 million.

10:13:27 And the $900,000 that's being spent to acquire it is

10:13:31 being partially funded by a grant from the state.

10:13:35 So, this appears to be a very good deal for the city.

10:13:40 >> Second.

10:13:43 >> I'd like to add to it, the comments that Councilman

10:13:46 Cohen made, because I too questioned the cost of the

10:13:48 property and sadly due to the downturn in the economy,

10:13:52 we did get a really good deal on this property.

10:13:54 There is also a grant in the contract for the sale,

10:14:01 purchase and sale is contingent upon our receiving

10:14:04 grant funds in the amount of $460,000.

10:14:07 So, partial portion of that full sales price is going

10:14:12 to be offset by the grant money we received.

10:14:15 And that will allow us to create a good deal of

10:14:18 conservation area on this property.

10:14:21 So, it will have a really nice green space and buffer

10:14:27 area as well as a fire station.

10:14:31 And as a bonus, we get to keep the stormwater pipes

10:14:35 that are on the site, so we got a little bit of a

10:14:38 bonus, so those are in excellent condition and

10:14:41 stormwater pipes are very large and very expensive.

10:14:44 And we'll be able to use that in our stormwater system

10:14:49 projects that are currently going on around the city.

10:14:51 So, we did get a bonus.

10:14:53 So I just wanted to mention that.

10:14:54 Thank you.

10:14:55 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

10:14:56 Any other comments?

10:14:58 Motion made by Councilman Cohen, seconded by

10:15:02 Councilwoman Capin.

10:15:03 All in favor?

10:15:04 Aye.

10:15:04 Item 56.

10:15:13 Councilman Reddick.

10:15:16 >>FRANK REDDICK: Thank you, Madam Chair.

10:15:18 We found that we have a serious problem with scrap

10:15:24 metal in this city and Hillsborough County.

10:15:26 And we have been working to see what we can do to

10:15:31 address this issue.

10:15:32 And I'm pleased to have, first I want to thank legal

10:15:38 that been working with TPD to see if we can come up to

10:15:43 a solution, a resolution pertaining to this problem.

10:15:46 And today, we have, before us, Captain O'Connor,

10:15:51 standing before us, he will be addressing this issue.

10:15:54 And then we have some members of the scrap metal

10:15:58 community, who is here as well, that would like to

10:16:01 speak.

10:16:02 I will assure you, once you hear the information

10:16:05 they're going to present to you today, you're going to

10:16:08 discover that we have a major, major problem in the

10:16:12 City of Tampa and Hillsborough County.

10:16:13 So, Captain O'Connor?

10:16:15 >> Good morning, Council.

10:16:17 Keith O'Connor, Captain with the Tampa Police

10:16:19 Department.

10:16:23 As Councilman Reddick said, the scrap metal problem is

10:16:27 an increasing problem for us in the city.

10:16:29 Currently we're at 47% increase on scrap metal related

10:16:32 thefts in the City of Tampa.

10:16:34 This goes hand in hand with the price of copper and

10:16:37 other metals.

10:16:38 As those prices rise, we always see an increase in

10:16:42 these thefts.

10:16:43 I want to draw your attention to this map.

10:16:45 It's a citywide map with a bunch of dots on it.

10:16:48 With the exception of the green dots, every one of

10:16:52 those dots relates to a scrap metal theft.

10:16:55 So the point here is this is a citywide problem, it's

10:16:58 not just isolated to one part of the city.

10:17:01 We're having problems throughout the city.

10:17:03 In addition to the price of copper, where there's an

10:17:09 abundance of vacant homes, due to the foreclosure in

10:17:13 the apartment.

10:17:14 These vacant homes and apartments and buildings are

10:17:18 being attacked for appliances and AC units and scrap

10:17:22 metal.

10:17:23 Currently, we have been investigating scrap metal for

10:17:26 years now.

10:17:27 We have taken a strong stance to combat it.

10:17:30 We have detective Dan Hinsz, whose primary function is

10:17:35 investigate scrap-related thefts throughout the city.

10:17:38 But with the hundreds of transactions that are taking

10:17:40 place every day in the city, and in the county, we

10:17:44 think we can do more.

10:17:46 So we looked into that.

10:17:47 What we found is that Hillsborough County has an

10:17:50 ordinance 10-5 that mandatorily requires the secondhand

10:17:54 metal recyclers to report every transaction daily to

10:17:59 law enforcement agency.

10:18:01 That's going to help us greatly.

10:18:02 So that's where we focused on.

10:18:04 We met with Hillsborough County and we found and we met

10:18:06 with our legal department and found that we can enforce

10:18:09 10-5 legally within the city.

10:18:12 And it's already there.

10:18:13 We have taken steps to do that.

10:18:15 We have already met with the company that created the

10:18:19 software, so that the companies can send the

10:18:22 information directly to the law enforcement agency.

10:18:25 So that's what we're going forward with.

10:18:27 What it's going to do is, everything that the state

10:18:30 statute requires that they get at the time of sale, our

10:18:33 investigators are going to get that the next day.

10:18:35 Instead of doing what we do now, which is Detective

10:18:40 Hinsz has to physically drive out to every one of the

10:18:42 scrapyards if he wants to investigate where this AC

10:18:45 came from.

10:18:46 Or where this catalytic converter came from.

10:18:48 He has to go there to get that information.

10:18:50 Now he will be able to do it from his desk.

10:18:53 So that's what we're looking to do.

10:18:56 It is to be at a cost of $250 per secondhand metal

10:19:01 recycling facility.

10:19:02 In the city we have 11.

10:19:03 In the county there's 11.

10:19:05 But what we're going to get, we are going to get access

10:19:07 to all of 22 of their data bases and what they're

10:19:11 moving every day.

10:19:12 Our belief is it's going to greatly enhance our

10:19:14 investigations and our attack on the crime related to

10:19:19 this scrap.

10:19:20 So, that's what we're going forward with.

10:19:22 And if anyone has any questions, I also have Detective

10:19:26 Hinsz here if you have any questions.

10:19:29 >> Councilwoman Capin, then Councilman Suarez.

10:19:33 >>YVONNE CAPIN: $250 per.

10:19:37 >> Per scrap facility.

10:19:38 In the city we have eleven, so that's a yearly cost.

10:19:43 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Thank you.

10:19:44 I just wanted to know.

10:19:45 Monthly, yearly?

10:19:47 >> Councilman Suarez?

10:19:49 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Captain, I'm not sure you're going to be

10:19:51 able to answer this question.

10:19:53 Because many of these homes are under foreclosure, has

10:19:56 there been any discussion with banks that own these

10:19:59 homes or the individuals that own these homes about

10:20:03 trying to help in terms of protecting against this type

10:20:06 of theft?

10:20:07 Any discussion about that?

10:20:08 Because I assume a lot of them, if they're in

10:20:10 foreclosure, no one's taking care of them.

10:20:13 Has code enforcement been involved in making sure that

10:20:18 these things aren't happening?

10:20:20 >> Well, we are in contact with them.

10:20:23 Especially if they have been in contact.

10:20:25 Now we need someone to represent that home in court to

10:20:27 get a conviction.

10:20:28 But yes, any time there's a vacant home that's becoming

10:20:31 a nuisance, code enforcement is brought in.

10:20:34 But it's the shear numbers of the homes that we are

10:20:36 having difficulty with.

10:20:38 >> Do you think a list of foreclosed properties would

10:20:40 be a great help to you, so you know exactly what some

10:20:43 of these are?

10:20:44 >> We currently do that.

10:20:46 >> Do you have it now?

10:20:47 >> With the homes, yes.

10:20:49 That will give patrol reasons to know what homes are

10:20:52 vacant in their zones.

10:20:54 >> Terrific.

10:20:54 Thank you.

10:20:56 >> Councilman Reddick?

10:20:57 >>FRANK REDDICK: Detective, do you want to speak to --

10:21:03 let me just share with you a prominent news anchor here

10:21:07 in this city, recently had his air conditioner stolen

10:21:16 from his property.

10:21:18 And that they, all they did is want to sell the copper

10:21:26 and some are taking the condensers and selling it to AC

10:21:31 companies.

10:21:32 And Detective Hinsz, if you could share how rampant

10:21:39 this problem is and what you're doing to deal with this

10:21:45 every day.

10:21:46 >> Thank you, Councilman Reddick.

10:21:50 Again, I have been doing this full time, nothing but

10:21:53 scrap metal thefts in the city probably the last 13

10:21:56 months.

10:21:56 I was fortunate for the last nine years of the 20 years

10:21:59 I have been on the department, the area I worked was

10:22:02 sector X, which is primarily the scrap metal, all

10:22:08 scrapyards were in my zone.

10:22:09 I just got to know them over time.

10:22:12 But the thefts are dramatic.

10:22:16 You can talk to most Realtors in Tampa, they pretty

10:22:18 much assume if they're renting a piece of property,

10:22:21 that the air conditioner is gone already.

10:22:23 They're hard to track.

10:22:25 This program that we're going to go with the mandatory

10:22:30 reporting will give us a huge data base, to where we

10:22:33 can follow-up on it.

10:22:35 Track people that are selling, large numbers, you got

10:22:39 Bob selling 25 air-conditioning units in a month and

10:22:42 he's not in the AC business.

10:22:44 You know, somebody may want to go talk to, see where

10:22:48 he's coming from.

10:22:49 See if it's legitimate.

10:22:50 If it's not legitimate business, where are you getting

10:22:53 them?

10:22:53 So it's a great tool for us.

10:22:55 We are on top of it.

10:22:56 We are making arrests every day.

10:22:58 Scrapyards here in the city and out into the county

10:23:01 have been working with us.

10:23:02 With this system that will bring us online, also

10:23:06 several other counties in the area.

10:23:07 So we'll actually be able to have 22 scrapyards in the

10:23:10 city and Hillsborough County alone, plus surrounding

10:23:13 counties.

10:23:14 So we are working on it.

10:23:15 We are going to get a handle on it.

10:23:19 >> And I think one, one of the scrapyard business

10:23:23 owners would like to come forward and identify

10:23:25 themselves and speak, share their experience, what they

10:23:30 deal with.

10:23:35 >> Good morning.

10:23:36 Jim Zacaro with Trademark Metals.

10:23:41 First of all, I'd like to thank the Tampa PD and their

10:23:45 efforts in working with the scrapyards.

10:23:47 They have been very diligent in pursuing leads,

10:23:49 following up, communicating with us.

10:23:51 Also like to emphasis that at scrapyards, there's all

10:23:56 kinds of misconceptions out there.

10:23:58 We're part of the solution.

10:23:59 We want to be part of the solution.

10:24:01 We work as closely as we can with the Tampa PD to

10:24:05 become part of the solution.

10:24:06 I openly invite anybody on the Council that's not

10:24:09 familiar with the scrapyard to please come by one of

10:24:11 our facilities.

10:24:12 Show you around.

10:24:13 Show you what we do.

10:24:14 How we work together.

10:24:15 And again, I want to thank them for their efforts.

10:24:21 >>FRANK REDDICK: And finally, Captain O'Connor,

10:24:24 anything you'd like to add?

10:24:26 >> I would just like -- he's right, what we have

10:24:29 learned from the 11 scrapyards, they are very

10:24:31 cooperative with us.

10:24:33 Dan has us on first-name basis with the people working

10:24:37 there.

10:24:38 All the information they have to collect anyway, they

10:24:40 give to him willingly.

10:24:41 We don't have any problems with that.

10:24:43 Once we get the ordinance in place and start enacting

10:24:46 it, it's just going to be sent directly to one data

10:24:49 base, a secure law enforcement data base that he can

10:24:53 research from the office.

10:24:54 And the man-hours alone and the gas for him driving out

10:24:57 to every one is going to save us a lot of money.

10:25:00 So, but yes, they are have been very cooperative.

10:25:03 We don't have any issues with the scrapyards.

10:25:05 We take care of them right away.

10:25:06 And lastly, I'd just like to thank Councilman Reddick

10:25:11 and Councilman Cohen for bringing this to the

10:25:16 forefront.

10:25:17 This is a growing problem this the community and I'm

10:25:19 glad you're interested in it.

10:25:21 >>MARY MULHERN: Councilwoman Montelione?

10:25:23 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Thank you.

10:25:24 And this is in the construction business, I mean, I've

10:25:28 been familiar with this going back several years now.

10:25:30 With the downturn in the market.

10:25:32 And it's not just the air-conditioning units.

10:25:36 I mean, even just this morning we got a phone call from

10:25:38 one of the builders we do work with.

10:25:41 And someone had gone into a house that he's building

10:25:44 and ripped the electrical right out of the walls.

10:25:49 You know, they go down to the box, they grab the box

10:25:52 and just pull the lines up.

10:25:53 Damages the drywall all the way up the wall.

10:25:57 So, it is a rampant problem.

10:26:00 It's getting worse.

10:26:01 I was wondering if the police department has

10:26:05 coordinated with any of the crime watch associations

10:26:07 that exist in the neighborhood.

10:26:09 I don't recall seeing a general alert going out to our

10:26:12 crime watch captains across all of the neighborhood

10:26:16 associations.

10:26:16 Because they might be the eyes and ears to, you know,

10:26:22 as they're walking or bicycling or keeping an eye on

10:26:27 the neighborhood, if they see anyone looking like

10:26:31 they're doing work on an air-conditioning unit and they

10:26:34 know that house has been vacant for quite sometime,

10:26:36 it's unlikely that there's someone servicing the unit.

10:26:40 >> You're exactly right.

10:26:41 And that particular statement you just made, I've said

10:26:44 personally at crime watch meetings, that vacant homes

10:26:47 do not need AC repairmen at the homes.

10:26:50 When you know it's been vacant for six months.

10:26:53 But we do address at the neighborhood watch meetings,

10:26:56 because this is one of our areas that we have an

10:26:58 increase in these types of crimes.

10:26:59 So that's always a topic of discussion at the

10:27:02 neighborhood watch associations.

10:27:03 And we point out the things that people need to be

10:27:08 diligent in on serving.

10:27:10 When you see these things that are suspicious, to

10:27:11 please call and let us come figure it out.

10:27:14 Because you're right, people, most of these homes, if

10:27:17 you're not paying any of the bills there, you're not

10:27:20 paying someone to fix anything there.

10:27:25 >>MARY MULHERN: I had one question, and then I'll ask

10:27:28 Councilman Reddick for his suggestions on what we can

10:27:34 do as a Council.

10:27:35 I was just curious about the data base -- do the

10:27:40 dealers share a data base or does just everyone keep

10:27:45 track and is going to pass the information?

10:27:47 >> Every secondhand metal dealer, they have to track

10:27:51 that information already.

10:27:52 So now it's at their facility.

10:27:54 All this does, we provide them the software to send the

10:27:57 data to our data base.

10:27:59 Law enforcement data base.

10:28:02 It's not accessible by them.

10:28:04 They can only send.

10:28:05 They can't browse.

10:28:07 >>MARY MULHERN: So it's your data base.

10:28:11 >> The sheriff's office.

10:28:12 >> The sheriff's office data base they're going to fill

10:28:14 in.

10:28:15 >> Right.

10:28:15 >> And were you suggesting, I haven't heard from legal,

10:28:19 I don't know if Mrs. Ginster wanted to speak.

10:28:23 I know you submitted a memo to us.

10:28:26 But is the idea that we are only -- we're just going to

10:28:30 enforce the county's ordinance, or do we need to adopt

10:28:34 something?

10:28:35 >> We're just going to enforce their ordinance, we can

10:28:38 legally enforce within the city.

10:28:40 That's what we went forward with there, when we found

10:28:44 out we can just use theirs.

10:28:47 >>MARY MULHERN: That's great. I like that.

10:28:48 Did Councilman Reddick, did you want to hear from legal

10:28:52 on this?

10:28:54 >>FRANK REDDICK: I think legal can concur.

10:28:57 If you'd like to speak to the point.

10:29:00 >> Good morning, Council, Cathy Ginster on behalf of

10:29:03 the legal department.

10:29:04 And yes, legal department concurs with the police

10:29:07 department's recommendation.

10:29:08 So thank you.

10:29:11 >> Great.

10:29:12 >>FRANK REDDICK: Finally, Madam Chair, want to also

10:29:15 thank TPD for the costs that you heard them mention,

10:29:20 that they are going to use their funding from the trust

10:29:23 fund to pay for this, $2,700 each year.

10:29:25 So I just want to thank you, Captain and Detective, for

10:29:30 your work.

10:29:31 And thank legal for cooperating with TPD to make this

10:29:35 happen.

10:29:36 >> You're welcome.

10:29:37 You're right, it's going to come out of the law

10:29:39 enforcement trust fund.

10:29:41 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

10:29:42 Any other comments on this? Thank you, Councilman

10:29:57 Reddick and Cohen and all of you for bringing this up.

10:30:01 I do think that the trust fund contribution is great,

10:30:07 helpful to the dealers, and not costing the industry or

10:30:11 the property owners to try to solve this problem.

10:30:16 So thank you.

10:30:18 We'll move on to item 57.

10:30:24 And city attorney Jim Shimberg is here to advise us on

10:30:31 this item, which Councilman Reddick also had initiated.

10:30:35 >> Good morning, Councilmembers, Jim Shimberg, here on

10:30:41 item 57, which is your motion to give a status report

10:30:45 and cost information on the Marion Lewis case.

10:30:48 Before I start, I need to note that your City Council

10:30:51 rules of procedure provide that Council should avoid

10:30:55 discussion of matters at a public meeting where the

10:30:57 city is, or likely to be a party in litigation without

10:31:00 the concurrence of counsel.

10:31:01 And additionally, it's the general policy of the city

10:31:05 not to publicly comment on pending litigation,

10:31:07 therefore, we're somewhat constrained in what we can

10:31:10 report to City Council today on the status of this

10:31:13 ongoing litigation.

10:31:13 However, subject to these constraints, I will attempt

10:31:18 to quickly respond to your request by simply referring

10:31:21 to information contained in several published opinions

10:31:23 on this case.

10:31:24 For any of you not familiar, this case goes back to

10:31:29 late 2006 when then police captain Marion Lewis decided

10:31:35 to run for mayor.

10:31:36 The case has to do with whether or not he was required

10:31:38 to resign in order to run and also whether he did in

10:31:42 fact resign to run by signing the oath of candidate.

10:31:50 In September of 2008, the Second District Court of

10:31:53 Appeal issued an opinion that stated that the resign to

10:31:56 run law dictated that Mr. Lewis resign his position as

10:32:00 a TPD captain in order to run for office against Mayor

10:32:04 Iorio.

10:32:05 And they basically overruled the trial court, who had

10:32:09 initially ruled for Captain Lewis in this case.

10:32:12 That was a published opinion in 2008.

10:32:14 We then had a decision in February of 2010 by the trial

10:32:20 court entering a final summary judgment for the city,

10:32:26 finding that Mr. Lewis was required to resign his

10:32:30 police position in order to qualify as a candidate.

10:32:32 Number two, he did qualify to run for office of mayor,

10:32:36 to stand for election, and number three, his actions

10:32:39 constituted a resignation from his position as a Tampa

10:32:42 police captain by operation of law.

10:32:45 Mr. Lewis appealed that decision and then in, just in

10:32:48 June of this year, the Second District Court of Appeal

10:32:52 issued an opinion that while they recognized that

10:32:57 Mr. Lewis was required to run from -- was required to

10:33:00 resign from the Tampa Police Department in order to run

10:33:02 for mayor, they concluded that the trial court had

10:33:05 erred in entering final judgment for the city,

10:33:09 determining that he had automatically resigned from his

10:33:12 employment by filing an oath of candidate form.

10:33:15 The city has recently filed a notice to invoke the

10:33:20 jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court, along with

10:33:23 the jurisdictional brief asking the Florida Supreme

10:33:26 Court to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction to

10:33:30 review this matter.

10:33:31 The Supreme Court has not yet decided on whether or not

10:33:35 it will consider this case.

10:33:36 With respect to the costs that have been incurred by

10:33:41 the city, in March of 2010, the city filed a motion to

10:33:45 tax costs, identifying costs of $1,704 as of that date.

10:33:51 We also incurred a $300 filing fee to seek review from

10:33:55 the Florida Supreme Court.

10:33:56 The city attorney's office through its salaried

10:33:59 attorneys, primarily chief assistant for litigation,

10:34:03 Jerry Gewirtz, has been primarily responsible for

10:34:06 representing the city on this case.

10:34:08 And although we have utilized the services of outside

10:34:12 counsel, Tom Gonzales, I just confirmed this morning

10:34:16 that he has spent approximately 16 hours or less than

10:34:20 $3,000 over the last four years in outside counsel fees

10:34:24 for this case.

10:34:25 Finally, in closing, if City Council wishes to discuss

10:34:30 this matter in any more detail, we need to schedule a

10:34:35 shade meeting or meeting outside the sunshine, pursuant

10:34:38 to the exception contained in Florida Statute 286.011,

10:34:40 where we can talk about this in a meeting that is

10:34:48 recorded, but not made public until after the case is

10:34:51 concluded.

10:34:53 That's all I have for now.

10:34:57 >>MARY MULHERN: Excuse me, counsel, but I just want to

10:34:59 comment before discussion, that we have -- it has been

10:35:06 the normal practice for this Council, since I've been

10:35:10 on it, to, if there was a case that Council wished to

10:35:15 discuss, that we did have a shade meeting.

10:35:19 And that was within our, you know, prerogative to do

10:35:24 that.

10:35:24 So, it has been the norm and I just want to reiterate

10:35:30 what Mr. Shimberg has said, that since we are in

10:35:36 currently still in litigation on this item, for us to

10:35:40 discuss it in public, including with anyone from the

10:35:45 public and especially with the press, we really

10:35:49 shouldn't be doing that.

10:35:50 I do think that the question that Councilman Reddick

10:35:57 presented, which was just about the cost associated, is

10:36:00 a reasonable one.

10:36:01 So I think if we maybe confine our questions today to

10:36:07 anything around that, because it doesn't have anything

10:36:10 to do with the merits of the case.

10:36:13 Would that be reasonable?

10:36:17 >> Well, if anybody has questions --

10:36:19 >> Madam Chair, I can ask a general question that

10:36:22 doesn't directly go to the case.

10:36:24 For city employees, basing your opinion on this

10:36:31 particular case, but in general.

10:36:33 Do they, do all city employees have to resign in order

10:36:36 to run for political office?

10:36:40 Has that ever been any kind of rule by the city,

10:36:43 allowing that?

10:36:44 And secondly, is there a different standard, if you are

10:36:48 a police officer, or a firefighter, versus being a

10:36:52 regular employee?

10:36:53 Or is there anything on that at all?

10:37:00 >> City attorney, David Smith issued a legal opinion on

10:37:04 this back I believe in late 2006, which I can get you a

10:37:08 copy of.

10:37:09 I don't have it with me right now.

10:37:11 I believe there is a distinction between different

10:37:13 levels of employment.

10:37:14 It basically relates to who your boss is.

10:37:17 There are some differences, depending on the level of

10:37:21 the employee of the city.

10:37:25 >>MIKE SUAREZ: That goes to my question, which is, if

10:37:27 you're in a command position, an align position as it

10:37:31 is in the military, where you're getting direct orders

10:37:35 from both the Chief and from the Mayor, if that has

10:37:40 some kind of issue with it.

10:37:41 So, you've essentially answered it.

10:37:44 I'd like to see that memo at some point.

10:37:47 >>MARY MULHERN: Excuse me, Council, I kind of feel like

10:37:49 that's getting to the merits of the questions involved

10:37:51 in this case.

10:37:52 And I don't think we should be discussing it in public.

10:37:55 Councilman Reddick?

10:37:58 >>FRANK REDDICK: Thank you, Madam Chair.

10:38:01 Well, then I think we need to have a meeting, what did

10:38:09 you say, a shade meeting?

10:38:11 So if that's what we need, because of -- you know, you

10:38:18 don't have to answer.

10:38:19 It's just me speaking.

10:38:21 Because I want to know whether the administration, the

10:38:26 mayor support the decision to move forward to state

10:38:31 Supreme Court.

10:38:32 I'd also like to know in discussion, why, if the city

10:38:38 is not trying to settle this instead of going to the

10:38:41 state Supreme Court.

10:38:42 And it's been going on for four and a half years now.

10:38:46 So -- they need to reach a conclusion somewhere.

10:38:55 And so, you don't have to answer none of these things,

10:39:00 but it's just -- I would like to make a motion that

10:39:04 this Council call a shade meeting, or legal, I don't

10:39:12 know what that terminology means, shade.

10:39:15 But, if that's the right...

10:39:18 >>MARY MULHERN: It is outside of the sunshine.

10:39:22 Mr. Shelby?

10:39:24 >>MARTIN SHELBY: It's colloquially referred to as a

10:39:26 shade meeting as opposed to something in the sunshine.

10:39:29 It is a closed session meeting, which is strictly

10:39:33 governed as an exception to the open meetings law by

10:39:35 Florida Statute.

10:39:36 So your motion would be in order I guess to put on the

10:39:39 agenda for the next meeting, legal department to come

10:39:41 back with the appropriate process.

10:39:43 Because it has to be a certain announcement and a

10:39:46 certain form made at a public meeting, properly noticed

10:39:50 pursuant to Florida Statutes.

10:39:51 So the appropriate motion, if that's Council's desire,

10:39:54 would be to direct legal to prepare a shade meeting,

10:39:58 excuse me, closed session is preferrable term, and

10:40:01 bring that back at the, to set it at the next -- to set

10:40:07 it when they come back at the next regular meeting.

10:40:11 Would that be acceptable?

10:40:12 >>FRANK REDDICK: That's the motion I was about to make.

10:40:14 Just make sure I understand the terminology.

10:40:18 That's my motion, Madam Chair.

10:40:24 >> I'll second that.

10:40:25 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor?

10:40:27 Aye.

10:40:27 So you'll come back at our next meeting?

10:40:33 >> I actually won't be here in two weeks, but someone

10:40:36 from our office will come back and give you the

10:40:38 procedures on that.

10:40:39 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

10:40:40 Item number 58.

10:40:44 We'll hear from Mr. Baird.

10:40:50 >> Good morning.

10:40:50 Madam Chair, members of City Council.

10:40:53 Here to answer questions on item 58, which is the

10:40:57 purchase of quick lime chemical used in water treatment

10:41:01 to adjust the PH of our water.

10:41:06 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

10:41:09 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Thank you, Madam Chair.

10:41:11 We have had a conversation about this.

10:41:12 I'm okay with the purchase and approval of the

10:41:16 contract, but I'm going to make the same comments on

10:41:19 this item as I have on previous items.

10:41:22 And that is, this company, although I love Pittsburgh,

10:41:26 Pennsylvania.

10:41:26 This company is from Pittsburgh, and always looking to

10:41:30 see what we can do about local sourcing.

10:41:33 I don't think Pittsburgh has the corner of the market

10:41:35 on lime.

10:41:36 So, reaching out to our local contract -- our local

10:41:41 suppliers and local businesses to find out why they're

10:41:43 not bidding on these contracts.

10:41:45 Would be my interest.

10:41:46 And again, we have only received three bids.

10:41:49 And that I didn't see -- we didn't have discussions

10:41:53 prior, but I know there are discussions coming around

10:41:56 now for cooperation with other municipalities and other

10:42:01 entities, like Tampa Bay Water, who itself use these

10:42:04 kinds of materials.

10:42:05 So, I think the purchasing department and I are getting

10:42:09 to be on a speed dial basis on these contracts.

10:42:14 And those are the things that I'm looking out for.

10:42:16 So thank you for answering all my questions beforehand.

10:42:21 And I would make the motion to approve item number 58.

10:42:25 >> Second.

10:42:27 >>MARY MULHERN: Motion made by Councilwoman Montelione,

10:42:29 second by Councilman Suarez.

10:42:31 All in favor, aye.

10:42:33 And item number 59, I think we were going to hear from

10:42:40 someone on staff from Mr. Lee.

10:42:47 Right on time.

10:42:49 >> Good morning, Madam Chair.

10:42:51 Irvin Lee, public works director, here to answer any

10:42:54 questions on 59.

10:42:55 >> Councilwoman Montelione?

10:42:59 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Thank you once again.

10:43:00 This is an item where I had particular interest in that

10:43:05 the bidder, I noticed, was a million 452,692.50 was the

10:43:12 low bid that we received for this contract.

10:43:14 This is a contract that would be, an as-needed contract

10:43:21 in familiar terms when something happens to our

10:43:24 signalization or there's a need for replacement on an

10:43:27 emergency basis, this would kick in and my question was

10:43:30 that in the agenda item as it was written, there was

10:43:34 $2 million being requested.

10:43:36 And Mr. Lee, as well as Mr. Spearman and I had

10:43:39 conversations about what the difference was between the

10:43:41 million 452,692.50 under the contract and the 2 million

10:43:46 being requested.

10:43:47 So, Mr. Lee, if you could explain what that difference

10:43:50 is to Council.

10:43:51 Thank you.

10:43:52 >> The $1.4 million number was -- that was the bid

10:43:56 amount.

10:43:57 So that's the line items in the contract that the

10:44:00 vendors actually gave us their unit costs on.

10:44:03 That was what we used to determine who the low bidder

10:44:07 would be.

10:44:07 That amount -- you also notice in the backup data, even

10:44:15 though we estimated $2 million as the amount we used in

10:44:19 this contract, the dollar value reviews for previous

10:44:23 years, fluctuates.

10:44:24 Last year we used approximately 3.5 million.

10:44:27 So that's an estimate of what we believe our

10:44:31 requirement would be.

10:44:32 And the amount that appeared in the bid was the

10:44:36 contractor's unit cost, based on the items that we felt

10:44:40 that we would use.

10:44:45 As you've seen in many other items that come before you

10:44:48 on a contracting basis.

10:44:49 The bid climate, which was exceptionally beneficial to

10:44:52 us on this particular item.

10:44:53 There was a difference.

10:45:01 >>LISA MONTELIONE: I am okay with that, once that was

10:45:03 clarified.

10:45:04 I wanted anyone in our viewing audience that noticed

10:45:07 that difference between the bid amount and the

10:45:11 requested 2 million, is a little bit less than half a

10:45:16 million dollars difference between the two.

10:45:18 And I wanted that on the record.

10:45:22 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you for pointing that out,

10:45:23 Councilwoman Montelione.

10:45:26 And I still don't understand why we are not approving

10:45:29 the bid amount, or something closer to it.

10:45:33 Why we are approving this.

10:45:34 Is there other work expected?

10:45:41 Is this because this is not the complete scope of the

10:45:45 work that we're expecting from this contractor?

10:45:49 >> For example, if I could show you a picture, we

10:45:54 allude to the fact that -- whoops.

10:45:56 Here's an example of the kinds of things that are

10:46:03 emerging requirements that pop up, that again, we call,

10:46:09 we rely on a contractor who has the capabilities, has

10:46:12 the heavy equipment.

10:46:15 They're familiar with our systems.

10:46:17 All of the contractors that bid on this are familiar

10:46:22 with the area.

10:46:24 So we had equipment.

10:46:26 We have capabilities for situations like this.

10:46:30 And I believe this was on Armenia and Cypress, an

10:46:35 accident had occurred some months ago.

10:46:38 And again, we were able to respond, get the

10:46:41 intersection open back up quickly because we had a

10:46:44 contractor available who had given us, you know,

10:46:50 prepriced amounts.

10:46:52 >>MARY MULHERN: That wasn't my question.

10:46:53 I understand that.

10:46:55 But...

10:46:58 >> So we anticipate in any given year, for example, we

10:47:01 can respond -- and we do augment the capabilities of

10:47:06 our staff, our normal installation program, where our

10:47:13 transportation division will warrant a signal or

10:47:17 replace --

10:47:19 >>MARY MULHERN: I understand this.

10:47:20 This is a bid for future work, right?

10:47:23 >> Yes.

10:47:23 >>MARY MULHERN: But why are they bidding 1.4 million,

10:47:27 if it's likely to be in the area of 2 million?

10:47:32 What does that bid mean?

10:47:34 Someone might have bid, you know, 1.9 million and not

10:47:42 gotten the job.

10:47:44 >> But the individual line items they bid on --

10:47:47 >>MARY MULHERN: So they're going to have to stick to

10:47:49 those individual line items in any job that comes?

10:47:52 >> Exactly.

10:47:52 The cost that they charge us for that individual line

10:47:56 item.

10:47:57 And based on the estimates, the estimated items that we

10:48:02 might use in a particular year, that was the number --

10:48:07 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay, so the individual line items were

10:48:10 better than the other people.

10:48:12 >> Yes.

10:48:13 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

10:48:14 Appreciate it.

10:48:14 Okay.

10:48:15 I think we'll go now to the other two items that --

10:48:22 >> Motion to approve item number 59.

10:48:24 >> Second.

10:48:25 >> Motion made by Councilwoman Montelione, seconded by

10:48:28 Councilman Suarez.

10:48:29 All in favor, aye.

10:48:31 And let's move to item number 14.

10:48:59 >> 14 is the water department.

10:49:00 And 35, the water department too?

10:49:03 >> 35 is growth management.

10:49:10 >> Why don't we hear from the water department on item

10:49:12 14.

10:49:15 >> Good morning again, Brad Baird, director of the

10:49:17 water department.

10:49:18 Item 14 is the purchase of 14 Ford Ranger trucks.

10:49:27 Three for the wastewater department, 11 for the water

10:49:30 department.

10:49:30 These -- the three for the wastewater department are

10:49:36 for sewer service inspectors.

10:49:38 The 11 for the water department, one is for the

10:49:42 treatment plant, associated with the pickup of parts

10:49:48 and inspection of work by contractors on our pumping

10:49:52 stations sites.

10:49:53 And the other ten are for meter readers, for the meter

10:49:59 readers use to get to the job site and carry their

10:50:04 equipment with them and replacement parts.

10:50:06 These 14 vehicles are eight to 10 years old, have high

10:50:15 miles and they fit the criteria, where we are expending

10:50:23 a lot of money to repair them.

10:50:25 Anywhere from 2,000 to $5,000.

10:50:28 So basically they're worn out.

10:50:31 They're up for replacement.

10:50:32 And that's what we're asking to do.

10:50:38 >>MARY MULHERN: Councilwoman Montelione, and then

10:50:40 Councilman Suarez.

10:50:42 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Thank you.

10:50:43 I pulled both of these items, 14 and 35, because they

10:50:46 are the purchase of vehicles.

10:50:49 And again, our purchasing staff, Mr. Spearman has been

10:50:55 very cooperative in answering the questions that I

10:50:57 have.

10:50:57 And, as well as Santiago Corrada and I had a

10:51:03 conversation yesterday.

10:51:04 And what I would be asking for today is the continuance

10:51:09 of those two items.

10:51:11 Only for a couple of reasons.

10:51:15 One is that we had discussed entering into agreements

10:51:21 with Hillsborough County or with other municipalities,

10:51:25 City of Temple Terrace, City of Plant City.

10:51:28 Or even other agencies with the purchase agreements for

10:51:34 savings of scale.

10:51:35 We have -- I looked at these two items.

10:51:40 We are buying -- all these products are Ford products.

10:51:43 We have two separate items, 14 vehicles on one item, 11

10:51:47 vehicles on another item.

10:51:49 We bid them out separately.

10:51:50 And although they are different types of vehicles,

10:51:56 they're all coming from Ford dealerships.

10:51:58 So I felt there was an opportunity there to combine

10:52:00 this to one Ford dealership, even though they are

10:52:03 different Ford products, but buying them all from one

10:52:06 Ford dealership.

10:52:07 And the other is, if we partner with other

10:52:09 municipalities or other agencies, perhaps we can have

10:52:16 an economy of scale and align our purchase of these 25

10:52:18 vehicles with the purchase of vehicles for some other

10:52:22 municipality.

10:52:23 So that was one thing that we discussed, Mr. Spearman

10:52:28 and I.

10:52:29 The other is that, these vehicles, while they are

10:52:38 important to the individuals in the performance of

10:52:42 their jobs, by delaying the purchase, I understand that

10:52:47 we're not going to have anybody sitting at the office,

10:52:50 you know, not doing their job because they don't have a

10:52:52 vehicle.

10:52:53 They have operating vehicles at the moment.

10:52:56 And you know, if need be, if something should happen,

10:52:58 I'm sure that there's an available fleet vehicle, you

10:53:02 know, to get that person to the place they need to be.

10:53:06 So, I don't think that we'll be missing an opportunity

10:53:09 by delaying this and exploring other purchasing options

10:53:13 for those vehicles.

10:53:14 So, you know, we would have to do some funding

10:53:18 alignment between the operating fund and the general

10:53:21 fund and when those funds are released, so that the

10:53:24 purchase could be made together.

10:53:26 There's some internal things that we need to work out,

10:53:30 but I think that it would be in the best interest of us

10:53:34 and our citizens and our taxpayers to just wait on

10:53:37 these items of bid before going forward.

10:53:40 Now, I understand the Ranger, something is being phased

10:53:43 out, but we have until September.

10:53:46 The date was sent to me.

10:53:49 >> September 23rd.

10:53:51 >>LISA MONTELIONE: September 23rd to purchase those

10:53:53 vehicles before the factory ceases delivering those to

10:53:58 local dealerships.

10:54:01 >>MARY MULHERN: So, Councilman, you would like to have

10:54:03 a continuance of 14 and 35.

10:54:06 And the question is whether -- you're saying it's

10:54:09 probably not time sensitive.

10:54:10 Is that what you're?

10:54:12 >> Good morning, Gregory Spearman, director of

10:54:15 purchasing.

10:54:16 I wanted to provide Council with additional

10:54:20 information, since Councilwoman Montelione and I did

10:54:23 speak yesterday.

10:54:24 I spoke with Hillsborough County, I spoke with Pinellas

10:54:26 County and also spoke with the City of St. Pete in

10:54:28 terms of their interest in doing partnerships of

10:54:33 cooperative purchasing for these vehicles.

10:54:34 What I found out, that all three entities purchase

10:54:37 their vehicles either off the state of Florida

10:54:39 contract, or off the Florida Sheriff's Association

10:54:44 contract.

10:54:44 So that's what in particular the county has been doing

10:54:47 for quite sometime.

10:54:48 So they seem to be very happy with that particular

10:54:52 arrangement in terms of how they purchase vehicles.

10:54:55 They do not do any bidding on their own because they

10:54:58 like the Florida Association of Sheriff's contract to

10:55:03 purchase vehicles.

10:55:05 The other point that you heard Councilwoman Montelione

10:55:07 make was that we do have a factory cutoff of

10:55:11 September 23rd on the Rangers.

10:55:13 This is the last year that Ford is going to actually

10:55:15 make that particular vehicle, which means that if we're

10:55:19 not fortunate enough to go ahead with the approval

10:55:22 today, that we may be purchasing a more expensive F-150

10:55:27 vehicle.

10:55:27 Because that -- they're going to basically phase the

10:55:30 Ranger out.

10:55:31 And the last point I want to make is address

10:55:34 Councilwoman Montelione's concern about why we didn't

10:55:37 bid the Rangers and the Escapes together.

10:55:42 We had tried doing that before in the past.

10:55:45 But the vendors particularly don't like us to combine,

10:55:48 even though they are Ford vehicles, to combine the

10:55:51 different types of vehicles.

10:55:52 And the reason being is because if a vendor is low on

10:55:56 the aggregate, they won't be necessarily on the line

10:55:59 item basis.

10:56:00 So, when we have a vendor that's low on one vehicle,

10:56:04 high on another, and we split the award, they tend not

10:56:07 to bid.

10:56:09 So in order to keep the competition going, we separate

10:56:12 these out individually so that we can get maximum

10:56:17 competition on each of these vehicles versus pulling

10:56:20 them together and not having the vendors bid.

10:56:23 Because they'd like to get the entire order.

10:56:24 A lot of times that isn't possible, because they're not

10:56:27 low on everything.

10:56:28 May be low on one item.

10:56:29 So when they spit it out, they don't bid, so we end up

10:56:32 not getting the competition we like.

10:56:35 >> Thank you.

10:56:36 Councilman Suarez?

10:56:37 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Thank you, Mr. Spearman.

10:56:39 Couple questions, one maybe to you, one maybe to

10:56:42 Mr. Baird.

10:56:42 So what you're saying, we are not going to be able to

10:56:45 have time to put together anything prior to the

10:56:49 September date for the Ford Rangers?

10:56:51 >> That is correct.

10:56:53 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Do you know what the price differential

10:56:55 is between the Ford Ranger and the F-150 if we wait

10:56:59 past that September date?

10:57:00 >> I don't have that information available, but I can

10:57:02 get that.

10:57:03 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Secondly, do you know what the cost

10:57:05 would be if we do not make the purchases by September

10:57:08 on repairs, you know, prorated or extrapolated based on

10:57:14 what we know?

10:57:15 I believe Mr. Baird mentioned about 2 to $5,000 per

10:57:18 vehicle cost.

10:57:21 So we're talking about 14 vehicles, correct?

10:57:24 On your purchase, correct, Mr. Baird?

10:57:26 >> Yes.

10:57:27 11 are water department, three are wastewater

10:57:31 department.

10:57:32 >>MIKE SUAREZ: You know, it may be that, and I have no

10:57:35 problem with what Councilwoman Montelione's spirit is

10:57:40 in terms of trying to pull this and finding out how we

10:57:43 can have some costs savings.

10:57:45 I'm just wondering if we're going to be a little bit

10:57:49 shortsighted if we don't purchase now, because the cost

10:57:52 is going to be much more if we go to F-150s.

10:57:56 I would suggest and I would, you know, that we move

10:57:59 forward on this particular purchase.

10:58:01 And I do believe that if we can look at how we can get

10:58:05 some better cost savings when we go out for bid.

10:58:10 If we do not purchase those 14, she had made a comment

10:58:13 that, you know, we still have vehicles available for

10:58:15 these folks.

10:58:16 Is that what it is?

10:58:18 >> We do currently have vehicles available for those

10:58:21 folks, that is true.

10:58:24 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I think that the real issue is, what is

10:58:26 going to be the cost differential between what the

10:58:29 F-150 is and what the Rangers are going to be, because

10:58:32 I don't know if we have got the time frame to actually

10:58:35 do what you've asked to do.

10:58:37 That's the only question I would have.

10:58:40 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Couple things.

10:58:41 The charter points out that it's administration staff

10:58:45 and the mayor that negotiate these contracts.

10:58:48 And would execute it.

10:58:49 So, anything that I ask for is going to be at the

10:58:51 pleasure of the administration.

10:58:53 But, on just looking at the water department,

10:58:58 wastewater department, we only had three bids.

10:59:01 There's a lot of auto dealerships around.

10:59:04 So I'm not sure why we're not getting a lot of

10:59:08 participation.

10:59:09 Auto manufacturers are suffering in an industry that

10:59:13 you would expect we'd have a lot of dealerships

10:59:15 responding.

10:59:16 And we're not.

10:59:16 We only have three.

10:59:18 The other thing is that we're assuming that if we don't

10:59:22 get the Rangers, that we're going to go up to a F-150.

10:59:26 The purpose of, the people who are using these vehicles

10:59:34 are meter readers, in this case, and in growth

10:59:38 management, it's building inspectors.

10:59:40 They don't carry a lot of equipment.

10:59:41 I mean, they carry some pieces of equipment.

10:59:46 They -- but the idea that we'd have to go from a Ranger

10:59:50 to an F-150.

10:59:51 There are other models in between that I think would

10:59:55 probably suffice.

10:59:57 >> Councilwoman, the only question --

10:59:59 >> MARY MULHERN: Excuse me.

11:00:01 Council, let me just -- I think that we could go on on

11:00:10 this for a long time.

11:00:12 In the interest of moving it forward, I think this is a

11:00:17 bigger discussion about fleet management, and you do

11:00:20 make the good point that we don't have a lot of say in

11:00:23 it.

11:00:23 But, I think we're just going to have to make a

11:00:28 decision, so -- about whether to continue these.

11:00:32 I'm sorry to interrupt, Councilman Suarez, but if you

11:00:37 could just give us some direction.

11:00:40 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I'd like to move the item 14 for

11:00:42 consideration now as opposed to waiting.

11:00:47 I think, as you said, there's larger discussion to be

11:00:50 had here.

11:00:53 But I'm not sure that, and again, I don't think it's a

11:00:55 matter of what particular vehicle we get.

11:00:59 There is going to be a cost differential somewhere.

11:01:01 So, I would like to move that item.

11:01:03 >> Second.

11:01:05 >>MARY MULHERN: Councilwoman Capin?

11:01:12 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I was going to second it.

11:01:14 And I was going to ask, on this -- I agree that this is

11:01:22 a larger discussion than we have time for at this

11:01:27 point.

11:01:28 And I would agree to move it forward.

11:01:34 >>MARY MULHERN: So motion made by Councilman Suarez,

11:01:37 seconded by Councilman Reddick.

11:01:39 All in favor.

11:01:41 Aye.

11:01:42 Opposed?

11:01:44 Nay.

11:01:46 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Montelione voting no.

11:01:55 >>MARY MULHERN: Item number 35, Councilwoman

11:02:03 Montelione.

11:02:05 >>LISA MONTELIONE: I thought we were discussing 14 and

11:02:07 35 together.

11:02:11 >>MARY MULHERN: Well, we already moved 14.

11:02:13 >> Then I move 35.

11:02:15 >> Okay.

11:02:16 >> Second.

11:02:18 >>MARY MULHERN: I just want to make a few comments

11:02:21 about this in general, before we vote on this.

11:02:26 And it relates to 14 too.

11:02:31 Not only -- I think it's an excellent idea that we look

11:02:37 at combining our efforts and it sounds like we had

11:02:40 support from someone, Mr. Spearman was saying that the

11:02:43 sheriff's department use the state program, and we

11:02:49 should maybe look into that.

11:02:50 I also would like to point out that a couple years ago,

11:02:59 there was a -- the city, the taxpayers paid for a fleet

11:03:04 management study for the city, which considered all of

11:03:07 our fleet except for I think police and fire.

11:03:11 And one of the things that Mr. Baird had mentioned,

11:03:18 which convinced me to vote for his item 14 for the

11:03:24 water department vehicles, one of the findings of this

11:03:28 fleet management study, which was great, and it was

11:03:31 about our long-term savings and management of our

11:03:34 fleet.

11:03:35 And one of them was, you have to sell your vehicles at

11:03:37 the right time.

11:03:38 So, you do not want to hold on to old rusting vehicles

11:03:42 because they're not worth anything.

11:03:44 So there's a really specific formula about when to do

11:03:48 that.

11:03:49 And I think -- I'm hoping, and I just think the motion

11:03:53 may be, someone will make when we are done with this,

11:03:57 to have the longer discussion about this.

11:04:00 But are we implementing those findings of that fleet

11:04:03 management study?

11:04:05 Because I'm not sure we are.

11:04:06 I know we have spent, I think it was at least $100,000

11:04:10 on this study.

11:04:11 And it had a lot of great proposals for how we can save

11:04:15 money.

11:04:16 I don't know if we're doing any of it.

11:04:18 I think it was two or three years ago.

11:04:25 >> Can we get a copy?

11:04:28 >> In 2009.

11:04:30 >>MARY MULHERN: So, I don't know where we are with

11:04:32 that.

11:04:32 I remember asking Mr. Daignault for a commitment that

11:04:36 we were going to do all these things and not getting

11:04:39 it.

11:04:40 So, I don't know what the decision was.

11:04:42 But -- let me just say one more thing and then I'm

11:04:47 going to be quiet.

11:04:48 Becomes more complicated when you start to talk about

11:04:51 working with other agencies and purchasing.

11:04:54 So, we could adopt this, those recommendations for

11:04:59 fleet management ourselves without doing this other

11:05:01 stuff.

11:05:01 I'm sure we could probably combine it.

11:05:03 But I think it's worth a longer discussion.

11:05:05 Yes?

11:05:13 >> Just to support what you were talking about, it was

11:05:17 the Mercury study done in 2009, and it did recommend a

11:05:21 fleet downsizing.

11:05:23 In my situation, I'm sure, and Mr. Baird's, a lot of

11:05:25 vehicles that we were using, F-150s, and we have

11:05:29 downsized to Ford Escape.

11:05:31 That's quite a bit, six-cylinder or four-cylinder.

11:05:34 And the Escape still allows us to do our mission.

11:05:39 We do carry a lot of tools and have large ladders,

11:05:42 wheels, computers set up on the inside.

11:05:44 They have a printer on the inside so they can print out

11:05:46 your permits right there in the field.

11:05:48 So, there's a lot of equipment that does go into the

11:05:50 vehicle, as well as large stuff that gets thrown into

11:05:53 the back, ladders, wheels, toolboxes, etcetera.

11:05:56 The other item is that in the enhancement fund, which

11:06:01 is the program that is, or the funding source for the

11:06:04 growth management vehicles, in that resolution that

11:06:08 Council passed in 2008, excuse me, it was recommended

11:06:11 in there that the vehicles are traded out every three

11:06:14 years.

11:06:15 For very similar reason that you mentioned.

11:06:17 And some of my vehicles are built in 2004.

11:06:21 2003, '04 and '05.

11:06:23 We have tried to stretch that as far as we can.

11:06:25 But at the same time, honoring the spirit of what that

11:06:28 resolution was and what the service levels that we had

11:06:31 agreed to with the industry, to make sure that our

11:06:35 vehicles were always operational, they could handle the

11:06:38 kinds of places we have to go.

11:06:39 Only other point I would like to make, we have selected

11:06:42 the SUV, the smaller version of the SUV, because the

11:06:46 inspectors are -- not first responders, but they're

11:06:50 some of the first people that are back into the

11:06:51 community during a major event.

11:06:53 And it's not only just the hurricanes, just like the

11:06:55 tornadoes that happened in South Tampa a little while

11:06:57 ago, they have to go there and they're driving around

11:07:01 and over tree limbs and through flooded streets, so you

11:07:04 don't want a vehicle that has no ability to handle

11:07:06 that.

11:07:06 And we do do off-road work as well.

11:07:09 It's not just on city streets.

11:07:11 It does go to a lot of different places.

11:07:14 Even the CAMLS site just over here near the side of the

11:07:16 garage, they had to drive onto that site, and that site

11:07:18 is all dug up and it's sand and it's dirt.

11:07:21 They're not just walking in the street.

11:07:23 They drive onto the sites.

11:07:24 In the future, you have sites, Georgetown's coming

11:07:27 online, Ashton Woods.

11:07:28 You're familiar with what's going on down there.

11:07:30 So, not just the New Tampa one.

11:07:33 Some of these other places are just as much off-road.

11:07:36 It's not like a bog, but you do have to have a vehicle

11:07:39 that has a little higher clearance.

11:07:41 I'll answer other questions.

11:07:44 >>MARY MULHERN: Any other questions?

11:07:48 >> I am familiar with the study, Lee and I talked about

11:07:52 it in-depth.

11:07:54 I understand that the, we do have to have a larger

11:07:57 discussion, because there are some impediments to our

11:08:02 partnering on that Sheriff's Association contract.

11:08:05 And I think that the Mayor's office, I understand, from

11:08:09 my conversation with Ms. Grime is moving forward with

11:08:14 discussions with other municipalities.

11:08:17 My intention was to get the best deal for these

11:08:20 vehicles.

11:08:21 And I thought maybe by waiting a little bit we could

11:08:23 get a better deal until the Mayor had explored those

11:08:28 agreements with other municipalities.

11:08:31 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay.

11:08:31 Thank you.

11:08:32 There's a motion on the floor made by Councilman

11:08:34 Suarez.

11:08:35 Seconded by Councilwoman Capin.

11:08:37 All in favor.

11:08:39 Aye.

11:08:39 Anyone opposed?

11:08:41 >> Nay.

11:08:43 >> Motion carried with Montelione voting no.

11:08:49 >> Thank you.

11:08:58 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay, we're going to move on to --

11:09:02 where are we?

11:09:04 >> 60.

11:09:09 >>MARY MULHERN: Item 60.

11:09:10 I believe that's our last item.

11:09:13 I need a motion to open.

11:09:17 >> So moved.

11:09:18 >> 61 -- I'm sorry, 60 and 61.

11:09:24 >> Is this 61 continued?

11:09:27 >> 61 was pulled.

11:09:29 >>MARY MULHERN: No, we are going to have to take it up.

11:09:37 >> Sorry.

11:09:38 Apologies.

11:09:39 >> So moved to open 60, 61.

11:09:42 >> Second.

11:09:42 >> All in favor?

11:09:43 Aye.

11:09:44 Okay.

11:09:45 Item number 60.

11:09:47 >> Barbara Lynch, Land Development Coordination.

11:09:49 This is request to vacate portion of an alleyway for

11:09:53 the greater Mount Carmel AME church.

11:09:58 Before I present this though, when I came into chambers

11:10:01 today, I noticed some people here that I asked them if

11:10:04 they were here for the vacating, and they are abutting

11:10:08 neighbors.

11:10:08 And they have some access issues with this alley being

11:10:11 closed.

11:10:12 >>MARY MULHERN: I'm sorry, we need a motion to --

11:10:16 anyone who wishes to speak, if you haven't been sworn

11:10:19 in, to stand and be sworn.

11:10:22 [Oath administered by Clerk]

11:10:28 >> Thank you.

11:10:29 >> So, I met with these ladies who are abutting

11:10:34 neighbors to the north side of the alley, and Mr. Day,

11:10:37 who represents the church.

11:10:38 And apparently when we went out there, the front of the

11:10:41 alley is blocked and we didn't see any access issues

11:10:45 off the alley.

11:10:46 I did see a car behind 3405 Genesee, but the alley is a

11:10:52 short alley and doesn't extend to that side.

11:10:54 The tire trucks are coming off 38th Avenue.

11:10:57 We weren't sure what was going on there.

11:10:59 But usually when we do the notice and everything, we'll

11:11:02 get calls, so I was not aware there were access issues

11:11:06 off the alley.

11:11:07 So, we have met with Mr. Day and the ladies.

11:11:10 And they have decided to request a continuance of 90

11:11:14 days to try and work out, possibly an easement

11:11:18 arrangement, so that if the alley is closed, they can

11:11:21 access their properties from the rear from another

11:11:24 portion of the church property.

11:11:25 And Mr. Day is here to request the continuance.

11:11:29 >>MARY MULHERN: Mr. Day?

11:11:33 >> Good morning.

11:11:34 My name is Wilton Day, I represent Greater Mount Carmel

11:11:38 AME Church, located 4209 North 34th Street.

11:11:43 I'd like to tell you what we're doing at the church

11:11:45 before we get to the continuance, if I'm allowed to do

11:11:49 that.

11:11:51 >>MARY MULHERN: That's fine.

11:11:53 >> What the church is doing that's making the church

11:11:56 accessible to comply with the ADA regulations.

11:12:01 It's an old church and what we have done so far is we

11:12:03 have increased the size of the steps going into the

11:12:08 sanctuary, in the rear.

11:12:10 We have re-done the bathrooms to make them ADA

11:12:13 compliant.

11:12:13 And the steps on the front of the church were built to

11:12:18 access the sanctuary at the top.

11:12:22 We have at least 16 steps going up in the front, and we

11:12:28 have 35% of our people that come to the church are

11:12:32 seniors, and super seniors.

11:12:34 Seniors are those that are 60 to 70 years old and those

11:12:38 supers are 70 on up to 90.

11:12:42 So, it's difficult for them to get into the church.

11:12:45 We are putting a ramp on the back of the church to

11:12:47 access the first floor.

11:12:48 But that second floor, it is difficult.

11:12:50 And we're losing people that are seniors and super

11:12:54 seniors because of that.

11:12:55 So the church wanted to put an elevator on the left

11:13:00 side of the church, facing 34th street.

11:13:04 And that's an alleyway there.

11:13:06 And we wanted to put the, build it and the elevator and

11:13:12 25 to 30 feet of -- into the alleyway.

11:13:17 Well, the church owns the lot between the alleyway and

11:13:20 the church.

11:13:21 So, at this point, we find that the two ladies need

11:13:27 access in writing, so that they can get to their home

11:13:32 from the rear of their homes, through this alleyway.

11:13:36 Well, we don't have any objection to that, because we

11:13:39 don't need that part of the alley that comes up to

11:13:42 their homes.

11:13:45 So we're requesting that we have a continuance so we

11:13:47 can work out the legalities to this, so when it's all

11:13:52 done, later after we're all gone, if anybody wants to

11:13:56 object to them coming into the rear of the church,

11:13:59 there will be a legal document stating that they can

11:14:02 continue to do so.

11:14:03 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

11:14:05 Councilman Reddick?

11:14:07 >>FRANK REDDICK: How do you do, sir?

11:14:08 >> Fine, sir.

11:14:13 >>FRANK REDDICK: I have been to your church on more

11:14:14 than one occasion.

11:14:16 And I noticed that you -- this had been on our calendar

11:14:22 for some months now.

11:14:24 And I guess each time, we have this continuance, you

11:14:32 still are denying that opportunity to get those 35

11:14:36 percentage of senior citizens there, to get on that

11:14:40 elevator.

11:14:41 And I understand the steps.

11:14:43 I climb them steps.

11:14:45 So, how long has it been since you been in -- these

11:14:51 concerns been brought to your attention? Have they

11:14:54 been brought -- the young ladies, has it been brought

11:14:59 to the church's attention prior to this?

11:15:01 >> This morning.

11:15:02 >> This morning?

11:15:03 >> Yes.

11:15:03 Well, what happened was, they got notification.

11:15:08 And I met with them and showed them the portion of the

11:15:11 alleyway that we wanted to vacate.

11:15:14 At that point, there wasn't any problem.

11:15:18 But they said they would be here.

11:15:20 And when it was brought up, that in order for them to

11:15:23 have an agreement that would allow them in the future

11:15:27 to continue to use that portion of the alleyway, that

11:15:30 we don't use, that we maintain, we cut the grass, we

11:15:34 have been cutting for 50 years.

11:15:36 So, that's where we are at this point.

11:15:39 >>FRANK REDDICK: Well, the final question is, I

11:15:42 understand you're requesting 90 days.

11:15:44 Is it possible that this can be worked out sooner than

11:15:48 90 days?

11:15:51 Because I would hate to see this continue to be delayed

11:15:54 when you just need to get that elevator in there.

11:15:57 >> Well, yes, we can.

11:15:59 We can do it in less than 90 days.

11:16:01 The reason I had requested 90 days, because it's

11:16:06 personal.

11:16:06 I'm a retiree.

11:16:09 I have been retired 23 years.

11:16:10 Normally from June the 15th to September the 1st, my

11:16:15 wife and I, we usually travel.

11:16:17 >> Okay.

11:16:19 [ Laughter ]

11:16:19 >> We can change that.

11:16:21 >>FRANK REDDICK: I understand that.

11:16:22 No problem.

11:16:25 That's all I have.

11:16:28 >>MARY MULHERN: So, you can tell us when you'd like to

11:16:33 come back.

11:16:35 I think Ms. Cole, did you want to --

11:16:38 >> October the 6th.

11:16:42 >>MARY MULHERN: October the 6th, okay.

11:16:43 And Ms. Cole, did you want?

11:16:45 >> I just wanted to make sure it's clearly understood

11:16:49 that this did just come to staff's attention.

11:16:51 But that once this alley is vacated, it becomes private

11:16:54 property, so if there isn't a correct document in place

11:16:57 for the private entities to deal with the access

11:17:02 issues, then the city would not be able to be involved

11:17:05 in it at all.

11:17:06 So that was just the issue I wanted to make clear.

11:17:09 >>MARY MULHERN: But the -- if they come to a legal

11:17:12 agreement with access that is -- that will be binding

11:17:16 in the future.

11:17:18 >> Between the two property owners, and then you would

11:17:20 just be looking at this as any other vacation petition.

11:17:24 >> So it doesn't -- does it solve the problem of change

11:17:27 of ownership?

11:17:29 What happens if there's a sale of the property?

11:17:33 >> I have to be somewhat cognizant not to give them

11:17:37 legal advice as what they should do to protect their

11:17:37 interest, but typically if there's a private easement

11:17:41 between the two property owners, it would run with the

11:17:43 land, if there's a change of ownership on either

11:17:46 property, there would be this easement that would run

11:17:48 with those properties to continue to allow that level

11:17:50 of access.

11:17:52 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay, thank you. Is there anyone else

11:17:57 who wishes to speak on the continuance?

11:17:59 Okay.

11:18:02 Can I have a motion to close the public hearing?

11:18:06 Or just -- oh, no, we don't want to close it.

11:18:10 I need motion for continuance.

11:18:12 >> Motion for continuance.

11:18:13 >> Second.

11:18:14 >> For October 6th, 10:30 a.m.

11:18:22 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor.

11:18:25 Aye.

11:18:26 Anyone opposed?

11:18:28 Okay.

11:18:29 Motion made by Councilwoman Capin, seconded by

11:18:36 Councilman Suarez.

11:18:37 Item number 61.

11:18:46 Are we going to hear from staff?

11:18:53 Or the petitioner?

11:18:55 >> Julie Cole, legal department.

11:18:56 This really did come at the request of my office.

11:18:59 As we were reviewing this case, we determined there's

11:19:02 some additional information that needed to be presented

11:19:04 to Council as part of this request for review.

11:19:09 Ms. Coyle would really need to be here in order to

11:19:11 provide that information and backup documentations.

11:19:14 She is not available today.

11:19:16 She's out of the office for a few weeks.

11:19:19 The petitioner and everybody else is comfortable just

11:19:23 going ahead and agreeing to the continuance so that we

11:19:27 could all make sure we have Ms. Coyle here when this

11:19:30 case comes back forward.

11:19:32 >> Move to continue to August 25th, 10:30 a.m.

11:19:37 >> Second.

11:19:37 >> MARY MULHERN: Mr. Shelby, do we normally do that?

11:19:40 Staff can just ask for the continuance, we don't need

11:19:42 the petitioner here to ask for it?

11:19:43 >> They have indicated to me, as I have indicated in

11:19:46 your -- in my request, that they're agreeing to the

11:19:48 continuance.

11:19:49 With them not being here, I'm comfortable that they

11:19:51 have accepted the continuance and will not make an

11:19:56 issue of that at some point in the future.

11:19:59 >>MARY MULHERN: And we're -- the request is to continue

11:20:01 to August 25th at 10:30.

11:20:03 Okay.

11:20:08 >> May I?

11:20:11 >>MARY MULHERN: Yes, Councilwoman Montelione.

11:20:14 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Thank you.

11:20:15 I just want to make sure, Ms. Cole, because this item

11:20:18 was the last item.

11:20:19 This item has been on our agenda many times.

11:20:22 And I want to be careful that the petitioner gets their

11:20:26 due process, so that we hear this item, when we're

11:20:32 scheduling it for this next time.

11:20:35 Because that has been continued and continued.

11:20:37 I would like to make sure that they get their hearing.

11:20:42 >> Understood.

11:20:42 Thank you.

11:20:45 >>MARY MULHERN: Is there anyone here who wishes to

11:20:47 speak on this?

11:20:48 It doesn't look like it.

11:20:49 But it will be noticed again, right?

11:20:53 >> There will not be an additional notification in this

11:20:55 instance because it's just continued on the record.

11:20:57 And remember in your review hearings, it's a very

11:20:59 limited notification to those folks who have been part

11:21:02 of the process in the previous hearings.

11:21:05 They have been told that this hearing is not going

11:21:09 forward today and there was -- well, they have been

11:21:11 told there was request for continuance, and that's why

11:21:14 those folks are not in the audience today.

11:21:16 I will make sure they are very well aware this was

11:21:19 continued and the date this was continued until.

11:21:22 >>MARY MULHERN: You're talking about the public?

11:21:26 >> Yes, the public.

11:21:28 I believe there are several folks that showed up at

11:21:30 your last hearing.

11:21:31 And those folks, I wasn't actually here for the last

11:21:37 hearing, but I don't know exactly who the folks are.

11:21:39 But I do know our staff folks as well as petitioner, we

11:21:42 are in contact with them to let them know there was

11:21:44 this request for continuance and when it would be

11:21:47 continued until.

11:21:48 By the fact they're not here, I'm presuming they have

11:21:50 the message.

11:21:51 But I will double-check to make sure they got the

11:21:53 message.

11:21:54 >>MARY MULHERN: Maybe you can remind us of this

11:21:56 discussion the next time it comes up on August 25th.

11:21:59 There was no one here.

11:22:02 >> I'll make sure.

11:22:04 >>MARY MULHERN: We are voting to continue an item when

11:22:06 neither the petitioner or any of the opposition was

11:22:08 here.

11:22:08 Was there a motion?

11:22:13 >> We have made a motion, moved and second.

11:22:17 >>MARY MULHERN: You made the motion, Councilman

11:22:20 Reddick, seconded by Councilman Suarez.

11:22:22 Is that right?

11:22:25 All in favor?

11:22:26 Aye.

11:22:26 All right.

11:22:28 Well, I think that's it.

11:22:34 For our agenda.

11:22:34 Anyone have any other new business?

11:22:40 In the last hour.

11:22:43 I need a motion to receive and file.

11:22:47 >> So moved.

11:22:48 >> Second.

11:22:48 >> All in favor?

11:22:49 Aye.

11:22:50 We are adjourned.



This file represents an unedited version of realtime
captioning which should neither be relied upon for
complete accuracy nor used as a verbatim transcript.
The original of this file was produced in all capital
letters and any variation thereto may be a result of
third party edits and software compatibility issues.
Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the
proceedings may need to hire a court reporter.