Help & information    View the list of Transcripts

Tampa City Council

Thursday, August 29, 2013



This file represents an unedited version of realtime
captioning which should neither be relied upon for complete
accuracy nor used as a verbatim transcript.
The original of this file was produced in all capital
letters and any variation thereto may be a result of third
party edits and software compatibility issues.
Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the
proceedings may need to hire a court reporter.

09:03:42 >> CHAIRMAN MIRANDA: City Council is called to order.

09:04:40 The chair yield to Mr. Frank Reddick.

09:04:42 >> Thank you, Mr. Chair.

09:04:51 Our invocation this morning will be done by Ms. Shirley

09:04:55 Foxx-Knowles, and she will lead us in the invocation and

09:04:58 pledge of allegiance.

09:04:59 >>SHIRLEY FOXX-KNOWLES: Good morning.

09:05:07 Let us pray.

09:05:07 Father, we thank you once again for this place and time and

09:05:12 for all those assembles for today's workshop meeting.

09:05:16 We thank you for the police officer being recognized this

09:05:20 morning.

09:05:20 We celebrate the officer and all the others that are being

09:05:23 commended for their extraordinary service to all our

09:05:27 community.

09:05:27 May they continue to persevere in their future service to

09:05:32 our city and continues to be wonderful examples of

09:05:37 outstanding Tampa citizens.

09:05:39 Thank you, father, for your grace and your mercy and for our

09:05:43 many blessings.

09:05:44 Bless our council and continue to guide them in all of their

09:05:49 decision making.

09:05:50 Make them instruments of your will.

09:05:54 Continue to bless our mayor, our administration, and our

09:05:57 great staff.

09:06:00 We are all so grateful for the opportunity to provide the

09:06:03 best possible service to our citizens.

09:06:07 And now, as we go about the worldly matters of this city,

09:06:11 please continue to keep us in your care and make us shining

09:06:16 examples of your love.

09:06:18 These things we ask and thanks we give with humble hearts.

09:06:22 Let us all say amen.

09:06:24 [ Pledge of Allegiance ]

09:06:27 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Roll call.

09:06:45 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Here.

09:06:49 >>FRANK REDDICK: Here.

09:06:51 >>MARY MULHERN: Here.

09:06:51 >>HARRY COHEN: Here.

09:06:53 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Here.

09:06:55 First the presentation, omen indication to police Officer of

09:06:58 the Month by Mr. Frank Reddick.

09:07:04 >> Whoa boy.

09:07:21 [ Laughter ]

09:07:31 It scared me on that one.

09:07:39 Good morning, council.

09:07:41 It's a pleasure to present our Officer of the Month for the

09:07:45 month of August 2013, officer and the chief will give us

09:07:51 some background.

09:07:52 >> Chief Castor: It's always my pleasure and honor to bring

09:08:04 Tampa's finest before you for recognition.

09:08:06 And this month it is officer Tim Burton.

09:08:10 Outside, I will tell you in confidence that Indo told me

09:08:17 that he's the one that's the brains of the operation.

09:08:20 He doesn't know why Tim is getting all the recognition but

09:08:23 here we are.

09:08:26 I'll give you a couple for the sake of time because if I

09:08:29 were to talk about all the things that Tim does we would be

09:08:32 here all week so I will give you a couple examples of the

09:08:34 outstanding work that he does.

09:08:41 In June of 2013 he was involved in numerous incidents that

09:08:44 took individuals into custody that are responsible for what

09:08:46 we call our big four crimes in the City of Tampa.

09:08:49 And you will see how important it is to pay attention to

09:08:54 some of those lesser crimes in taking these individuals off

09:08:59 the streets that are committing crimes.

09:09:04 June 2nd, a suspect, he had a pickup for an individual

09:09:13 for domestic battery.

09:09:16 Tim took it upon himself to call the victim, get several

09:09:19 addresses for her and found out there was a possibilities

09:09:22 that he was staying at his sister's house.

09:09:25 Tim went over to that location with the district 3 ROC squad

09:09:29 and was able to take the suspect into custody, and as a

09:09:33 result he was responsible for several other crimes in

09:09:36 addition to this domestic battery, and he's facing 15 years

09:09:40 in Florida State prison right now.

09:09:42 June 5th, he was called in reference to another suspect

09:09:47 that was wanted for controlled substances.

09:09:51 He and other officers went to the location.

09:09:53 They were able to -- Tim was able to ascertain other

09:10:01 location it is suspects may have been at.

09:10:02 He went to one of those, took the suspect into custody, not

09:10:06 only for those for controlled substances, big surprise, the

09:10:09 individual had a large amount of narcotics on his person

09:10:12 when he was arrested.

09:10:14 June 6th, with the ROC squad and Hillsborough sheriff's

09:10:21 office they were looking for a known suspect wanted for

09:10:25 several charges, and based on surveillance done by Tim, he

09:10:29 and Indo were able to take this individual into custody and

09:10:34 put him into jail as well.

09:10:36 Then on July 7th, he was on an unrelated call.

09:10:41 An officer had arrested a suspect.

09:10:42 He went, talked to the individual.

09:10:44 The individual had some weapons charges against him.

09:10:47 Tim was able to develop a rapport with the suspect and found

09:10:52 out that he could actually sell the guns back to the

09:10:54 individual that he had obtained it from.

09:10:57 A search warrant was written and approved, and as a result

09:11:02 of that, Tim working with the D-2 ROC squad they arrested

09:11:08 four individuals.

09:11:09 During the search warrant they got a large amount of felony

09:11:12 narcotics, nine firearms, two of which had been reported

09:11:16 stolen.

09:11:18 So he has done an amazing job.

09:11:21 And besides his responsibilities as a canine, that's his

09:11:26 full-time duty, he stayed aware of everything that's going

09:11:29 on in the city.

09:11:30 He knows all the offenders in his area of responsibility,

09:11:33 and he goes above and beyond to make sure that our community

09:11:36 is safe every day.

09:11:37 He does a lot of other things in his own personal time.

09:11:42 I'm not sure if you guys are Facebook followers.

09:11:45 If you are not you need to be.

09:11:46 But you may have seen the video of Tim where he got out of

09:11:49 the car and he was playing football with the young

09:11:54 neighborhood kids down in Sulphur Springs.

09:11:58 And through football into another zip code and the end of

09:12:03 the football game. Anyway, the kids were clearly impressed

09:12:07 by him.

09:12:07 And he is an outstanding member of our department as is

09:12:11 INDO, and it is certainly my honor to recognize him for all

09:12:14 that he has done as the Officer of the Month for August

09:12:18 2013.

09:12:19 Congratulations.

09:12:20 [ Applause ]

09:12:31 >>FRANK REDDICK: Keep him sitting down.

09:12:33 On behalf of Tampa City Council we would like to present you

09:12:35 with a commendation.

09:12:37 We would like Officer of the Month for August 2013.

09:12:41 We want to congratulate you.

09:12:42 Thank you.

09:12:47 And we have some good things for you.

09:12:49 >> I told Councilman Reddick that INDO is a very nice dog bu

09:12:58 although outside when I did try to pet him look what

09:13:01 happened.

09:13:03 [ Laughter ]

09:13:08 >> Chip Deblock with Tampa PBA on behalf of PBA and star

09:13:14 shield insurance we partner with, it's a $100 gift card to

09:13:17 give to you.

09:13:17 So congratulations.

09:13:18 >> Good morning, council.

09:13:31 On behalf of Tampa Theatre, we would like to present you and

09:13:35 you a friend -- [ Laughter ] with a one-year membership to

09:13:40 the theater.

09:13:41 Thanks for everything you do.

09:13:41 >> Good morning.

09:13:50 I'm general manager for Bill Currie Ford.

09:13:54 I would like to first take this opportunity to invite City

09:13:57 Council members and the police department out to Bill Currie

09:14:01 Ford on Saturday, September 27th, doing a food drive for

09:14:05 Metropolitan Ministries.

09:14:06 And the food drive is also kind of like a drive-through

09:14:12 community event also.

09:14:13 What it does is for everybody that comes out and drives $20

09:14:17 is donated to Metropolitan Ministries for their services.

09:14:22 So officer Burton, on behalf of Bill occur really Ford and

09:14:29 their team members, thank you for everything you have done.

09:14:34 We present you with this watch.

09:14:36 >> Good morning, council.

09:14:41 Anna Peters here representing Straz Center for the

09:14:43 Performing Arts.

09:14:45 For everything you do I would like to present you with this.

09:14:52 >> Steve Stickley representing Stepp's towing service on

09:15:00 behalf of Jim, Judy, Todd Stepp.

09:15:03 We would like to give you this token of our appreciation for

09:15:06 a job very well done.

09:15:08 We also have a gift card for you to have Lee Roy Selmons.

09:15:13 Joe Durkin called.

09:15:16 He had some car problems.

09:15:17 And he will catch up to you on behalf of Bright House.

09:15:20 I do have a short story I'm remembering last time we were in

09:15:24 here, and there was a indicate nine.

09:15:28 I was over here.

09:15:29 And the dog wouldn't tab his eyes off me.

09:15:31 Kept barking and barking and Chief Castor said check Steve's

09:15:36 pockets.

09:15:40 [ Laughter ] congratulations.

09:15:41 >> I'm from flowers in Ybor City, and normally I don't bring

09:15:53 these for you.

09:15:54 I do it for your significant other.

09:16:00 But I will really give these to your wife.

09:16:04 >>STEVE MICHELINI: You dropped this, chief.

09:16:17 I just found it on the floor.

09:16:22 I should have left it there, H huh?

09:16:25 Steve Michelini.

09:16:26 I'm here on behalf of a couple of different folks.

09:16:31 And I think your friend there would like to go to Bern's.

09:16:35 What do you say?

09:16:39 You have to bring the leftovers home.

09:16:45 We are very proud of what you do for the community and we

09:16:48 would like to send you there and provide you with a $100

09:16:51 gift certificate.

09:16:53 Also, does he like Mediterranean food?

09:16:57 >> I'm sure he does.

09:16:59 >> Mediterranean cafe.

09:17:03 Or he can go and on behalf of Bryn Allen now called prestige

09:17:15 portrait, you can include how many people out want in that.

09:17:19 So decide what you want.

09:17:21 And a new sponsor is CHICOS restaurant group and they have a

09:17:27 couple of different restaurants.

09:17:29 You can take breakfast, lunch or dinner at The Lodge, Daily

09:17:33 Eats, Water, or Chi-Chi's.

09:17:41 That's for you.

09:17:41 There are your certificates.

09:17:43 Don't let him chew 'em up.

09:17:46 Dog ate your homework, right?

09:17:48 On behalf of all the sponsors we are very pleased and proud

09:17:51 of what you do. And as the chief always says, there's never

09:17:54 a day off for the officers in the field or home.

09:17:59 They are always on duty and we know that and we appreciate

09:18:02 it.

09:18:02 Thank you.

09:18:02 >> First I would like to thank City Council for recognizing

09:18:17 me on this award.

09:18:22 I would like to thank everybody, my corporal for putting me

09:18:25 in for this, for writing it up, doing such a great job,

09:18:29 looking at everything that I do.

09:18:34 It's just part of being a K-9 handler.

09:18:37 Just because I have a dog doesn't mean I'm not a cop

09:18:40 anymore.

09:18:40 I'm still a cop, and it shows that I still want to reduce

09:18:44 crime in the City of Tampa.

09:18:46 It needs to go down.

09:18:47 And it has.

09:18:50 I would like to thank my chain of command, my fellow

09:18:53 officers, and my family, and the chief.

09:18:59 [ Laughter ] [ Applause ]

09:19:01 >> Chief Castor: Also in closing, we have all the K-9 dogs

09:19:10 back here and usually they do their a laws, which is a

09:19:14 woof-woof, usually is what they do. But this is the next to

09:19:17 last day for major Sophie.

09:19:23 She is retiring after almost 30 years, has done an

09:19:28 outstanding job not only with the police department but

09:19:30 serving our community in so many ways.

09:19:32 I want to give her accolades and a thank you not only for

09:19:37 what she has done but for being a great friend.

09:19:40 She deserves her retirement.

09:19:41 And I don't know what we are going to do without her.

09:19:44 Sophie, come on up.

09:19:48 >> I'm dressed in short sleeves because I didn't know I

09:19:59 would be in front of you today.

09:20:00 Actually, I put on long sleeves today and I forgot and I had

09:20:07 to change back into short sleeves.

09:20:09 Thank you.

09:20:09 This has been great working with all of you.

09:20:12 It's been great.

09:20:13 I don't know if the citizens of Tampa realize, I have met

09:20:17 each of you, just regular people wanting to improve things

09:20:20 here in the city.

09:20:22 I thank you for your support.

09:20:24 These officers every month, you take time out of your

09:20:27 schedule, which I know you are very busy, to recognize one

09:20:31 of these guys or girls out there busting their butt trying

09:20:34 to make things better.

09:20:36 Thank you.

09:20:36 I am going to miss it.

09:20:37 You all are lucky, I live in the county so I won't be here.

09:20:41 >> The county commission might have a problem.

09:20:43 >> I want to the do some improvements on the county but I

09:20:46 won't be bugging you guys.

09:20:48 Thank you.

09:20:50 [ Applause ]

09:20:57 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Let me say one thing.

09:20:59 Therein must be a cave-in around that speaker podium because

09:21:03 people walk around.

09:21:05 So there's a cave-in or wash-out or pothole or something

09:21:09 there.

09:21:09 >> He's a sweet dog.

09:21:12 Only goes when he tells him to go.

09:21:16 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Well, let's not get him riled up right

09:21:18 now.

09:21:18 Thank you very much all of you.

09:21:20 Major, thank you for all your years of service.

09:21:23 You have been an angel in that uniform as a police officer.

09:21:31 Okay.

09:21:32 Mrs. Montelione will do the next presentation, commendation

09:21:36 for assistant city attorney Jan McLean.

09:21:48 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Good morning.

09:21:50 Thank you, council.

09:21:51 I would like to introduce -- we all know assistant city

09:21:54 attorney Jan McLean.

09:21:56 But the public maybe not as much as we do.

09:21:59 But I wanted to take this time on behalf of council to thank

09:22:03 the assistant city attorney, because when several of us

09:22:08 attended the recent Florida League of Cities conference in

09:22:11 Orlando, I was excited to see Ms. McLean's name up there on

09:22:17 the screen and find out that she had been once again

09:22:21 recognized as a home rule hero.

09:22:25 Ms. McLean was recognized by the League of Cities for her

09:22:28 efforts, advancing the league's legislative agenda and

09:22:31 protecting the home rule power of Florida cities.

09:22:34 Ms. McLean's efforts have always been above the call of duty

09:22:38 including traveling to Tallahassee during the legislative

09:22:40 session to lobby on behalf of Florida cities.

09:22:43 On this day, August 29th, 2013, the Tampa City Council

09:22:46 is proud to present this commendation recognizing assistant

09:22:50 city attorney Jan McLean for her Florida League of Cities

09:22:54 home rule hero award.

09:22:56 We appreciate her continued efforts to advance the City of

09:22:58 Tampa and the Florida League of Cities.

09:23:02 So, in essence, she's not only representing and protecting

09:23:06 our city, but cities all over the State of Florida.

09:23:10 But don't get any ideas because we don't want to see you --

09:23:15 is that right, city attorney -- we anytime soon.

09:23:23 So thank you for your work and continued appreciation for

09:23:25 everything you do.

09:23:29 [ Applause ]

09:23:31 >> Jan McLean: I do want to say thank you and thank you for

09:23:39 the opportunity and privilege of representing the city on

09:23:42 the issues that you put forth.

09:23:45 And I wanted to thank Julia and city attorney than has given

09:23:50 me that opportunity to represent you.

09:23:52 Thank you.

09:23:52 >>JULIA MANDELL: And it has been an absolute pleasure to

09:24:00 work with Jan over the past eight years and I had the

09:24:02 opportunity to go with her to a couple of committee meetings

09:24:05 at the Florida league of cities and she has just done a

09:24:09 phenomenal job and works hard not only for the city but for

09:24:12 the municipalities and the cause to make sure that we are

09:24:14 continuously represented, and pleased to continue to work

09:24:18 with her and she absolutely deserves this award.

09:24:21 Thank you.

09:24:21 >>MARY MULHERN: Congratulations, Jan.

09:24:25 I just want to say that you are the water legal expert, and

09:24:29 such a great steward of our water in the city, and beyond in

09:24:34 the county and the region.

09:24:35 And thank you for everything you do.

09:24:37 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Jan, having been involved with one of the

09:24:42 issues you dealt with, water and the kind of perseverance

09:24:45 that you showed trying to get some of those issues solved, I

09:24:49 have to tell you, you really are a pretty tough cookie.

09:24:52 We had some really intelligent and well thought out

09:24:59 opponents to some of the things that we were working on and

09:25:02 you were working on.

09:25:03 And I think that your perseverance really showed that we

09:25:08 could come up with a good answer and a compromise and get

09:25:10 some of the things resolved.

09:25:12 I think most people who know you, especially at the League

09:25:15 of Cities, know that you are an effective advocate for water

09:25:19 issues, and we are very appreciative that you are here in

09:25:22 the City of Tampa.

09:25:23 Thank you.

09:25:23 >>HARRY COHEN: Thank you.

09:25:26 You know, Councilwoman Mulhern and Suarez just alluded to it

09:25:32 but I want to the say it directly, you are really a champion

09:25:35 in the environmental protection.

09:25:36 And that is something that the citizens, both with the city

09:25:39 and of our entire state, can really thank you for.

09:25:42 And one of the signature accomplishments of this council, in

09:25:45 my view, was undertaken with your help, and that was the

09:25:50 fertilizer ban that we passed.

09:25:52 And I believe that is something that we can be very proud of

09:25:55 because it's going to make a real difference in the water

09:25:58 quality in this community.

09:25:59 So thank you very much.

09:26:04 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Jan, let me just say this.

09:26:05 Although everything said has been factual, subject matter,

09:26:11 not certainly the League of Cities but I think is regarding

09:26:14 the reclaimed water.

09:26:15 As you well know -- you can get to the mike.

09:26:19 I am not going to bark at you.

09:26:22 Is the item of who owns the rights to reclaimed water.

09:26:25 Through your help, and others we were able to convince the

09:26:30 legislature that, yes, the rivers of the waters and lakes

09:26:35 belong to the state but the belongs to the great cities of

09:26:40 Florida.

09:26:41 And that being said, I think that somewhere along in the

09:26:44 future, maybe not today, not tomorrow, that this city will

09:26:47 recognize that 40, 50 years from now when you are still a

09:26:51 teenager, that these things that you have worked on are so

09:26:54 beneficial for the stability of the economic situation of

09:26:58 this city, and those who have water, in essence have the job

09:27:03 power.

09:27:03 And what does that mean?

09:27:05 That sooner or later, indirect water will be used, and that

09:27:08 the reclaimed water belongs to those who produce it.

09:27:11 And that's the most important thing you can say, because

09:27:13 without that, you produce it, it belongs to somebody else.

09:27:17 It was your cost.

09:27:18 It was your straightforwardness to do things to clean up

09:27:23 that water that goes into the bay, which is better than 90%

09:27:27 of all the world's drinking water.

09:27:29 And we want to thank you sincerely for spearheading that

09:27:33 drive that recently passed legislature this past session.

09:27:37 Thank you very much.

09:27:39 That being said, I have a memo from Yvonne Yolie Capin.

09:27:44 I will be absent from today's workshop due to family

09:27:48 illness.

09:27:49 Need a motion to receive and file.

09:27:50 Motion by Mr. Suarez.

09:27:51 Second by Mr. Cohen.

09:27:52 All in favor?

09:27:53 Opposed?

09:27:54 The ayes have it unanimously.

09:27:56 Item number 3.

09:27:59 Ms. Montelione.

09:28:00 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Thank you, Mr. Chair.

09:28:02 At this time, I would like to ask Jaya Goswami, and Adam

09:28:11 Pearson to come up and give a presentation to council.

09:28:13 The opportunity has come to me to meet and discuss many

09:28:19 items about how our city does business, how we engage our

09:28:23 citizens, and sustainability issues, environmental issues,

09:28:29 that many of us are interested in.

09:28:32 And Jaya has been working with change labs from Stanford

09:28:39 university.

09:28:39 She and Adam are both recent graduates of Stanford.

09:28:43 I know that Jaya has dual masters degrees in civil

09:28:48 engineering and environmental policy, which from Stanford to

09:28:51 take both course work at the same time is quite a feat.

09:28:59 So the opportunity arose to have Jaya come and speak to us

09:29:02 about sustainability which she graciously did awhile back.

09:29:05 And in my effort to engage Jaya here at the city has not

09:29:14 gained as much traction as I would have liked.

09:29:18 How far, my ability to have Jaya work with the metropolitan

09:29:22 planning organization fared much better.

09:29:24 So recently, both Adam, Jaya, and their research partner

09:29:31 back in California embarked on a study of transportation and

09:29:36 transforming the discussion of transportation in

09:29:39 Hillsborough County.

09:29:42 And I believe we saved about 20 or $30,000 because Jaya was

09:29:46 successful in convincing the director of the change labs in

09:29:53 performing this work pro bono, and to get that amount of

09:29:58 work and that stature of work, I am very grateful, and you

09:30:02 can deliver that message back to Vani in California for me.

09:30:07 So with that, I would like to turn it over to Jaya and to

09:30:11 Adam to make their presentation.

09:30:15 And you can put the overheads that we have handouts for, you

09:30:18 can put them on the -- if you would like, use the Elmo, the

09:30:23 overhead.

09:30:23 >> Jaya: Which overhead?

09:30:35 We are technologically able, I promise.

09:30:53 Okay.

09:31:09 Great.

09:31:11 Thank you, members of the council, for giving us this

09:31:14 opportunity to present the change labs, and what it is we

09:31:19 do.

09:31:20 I sort of want to introduce by letting you know that I am

09:31:23 currently a Tampa resident.

09:31:26 I consider myself -- I consider myself a bull gator.

09:31:30 I went to the University of Florida for undergraduate, and

09:31:33 both my husband and father work at USF.

09:31:36 So very strong ties to the region, and I think that's why

09:31:40 I'm here to really present to you, is because I really feel

09:31:44 like there is a great potential within Tampa, and I would

09:31:50 like to be a part of that chain.

09:31:52 And I think that we have some interesting ideas for you to

09:31:56 see that through.

09:31:57 A little bit about Stanford change lab.

09:32:00 We are a group dedicated to initiating large-scale

09:32:05 transformation.

09:32:05 And we do that by applying a new innovation methodology, a

09:32:10 new process.

09:32:10 So as Lisa mentioned, a few months ago we had a graduate

09:32:16 course that we offered at Stanford where we go through this

09:32:20 methodology, and we engage students on different project

09:32:24 teams, and one of the projects we brought forward was with

09:32:27 the MPO and talking about transit and came up with

09:32:34 completely a new approach that would have built

09:32:39 relationships and built partnerships to move us forward on

09:32:42 this issue.

09:32:43 And so Adam was part of that team.

09:32:45 And I think will have come up with some amazing ideas that

09:32:49 we would like to present to you today.

09:32:51 But I wanted to take a step back and talk to you about

09:32:54 something that you might find interesting, a project that we

09:32:57 have been working on within city government in Silicon

09:33:00 Valley.

09:33:02 It's the city governments and private sector tech companies.

09:33:09 So we will skip forward and show you.

09:33:14 So here is a list of some of the companies that were engaged

09:33:20 in this platform.

09:33:22 You can see it was raining from Google to HP to Microsoft,

09:33:26 i.e., Cisco.

09:33:30 The list goes on.

09:33:31 And we were approached basically by this partnership called

09:33:34 silly von valley partnership where city governments and tech

09:33:37 companies like I said came together, but they wanted to

09:33:40 solve city problems.

09:33:41 And they wanted to do it in a way that could co-create

09:33:45 solutions.

09:33:45 So use the power of the private sector.

09:33:50 Use all of the talents in the private sector to solve

09:33:52 problems at the city level, and also bring the insight, the

09:33:58 knowledge of public sector problems that city officials

09:34:01 bring, that agency officials bring, and have them work

09:34:05 together.

09:34:05 And so what we did was we led a series of workshops.

09:34:10 We called them innovation workshops.

09:34:12 We used the team process which is basically taking people

09:34:15 from a challenge or problem do, or what we call design in

09:34:24 solutions.

09:34:24 So what happened at this workshop was we had members -- we

09:34:28 had the mayor of San Jose, mayor chuck reed, we had the

09:34:33 mayor of Santa Claire, we had Fremont represented -- these

09:34:38 are all cities there -- and we had all these tech companies

09:34:41 and it would break up into teams and try to solve public

09:34:44 sector problems together.

09:34:46 And we actually had strategies by the end of this series of

09:34:49 workshops of it how would everybody engage and what would

09:34:57 they solve?

09:34:58 So whether it was increasing engagement on public sector

09:35:02 platforms, or if it was solving traffic conditions, that was

09:35:07 something that is correct we did. So that was something we

09:35:09 did in Silicon Valley.

09:35:11 And I think while that may be interesting, Adam can really

09:35:14 present to you what we did here with the MPO and what some

09:35:18 of the projects and some of the concepts that they came up

09:35:21 with.

09:35:21 >>

09:35:26 >> Adam Pearson: Thank you, Jaya.

09:35:29 So we had a slide back there that we didn't cover head on,

09:35:35 but we always start with the power of reflection.

09:35:37 We think about looking at the problems more abstractly.

09:35:41 Instead of diving into solutions, we spend this time in the

09:35:44 first part of the design on understanding the system.

09:35:47 So this really begins the process, begins our transformation

09:35:53 model, and our methodology, and in doing that, we spend a

09:35:56 lot of time talking to people, just regular people, not just

09:35:59 doing hard core research but we go out and talk to regular

09:36:02 people from Tampa, and regular people from Hillsborough

09:36:05 County.

09:36:05 We try to understand what their needs are.

09:36:07 And not just why they voted yes or no on the referendum but

09:36:11 maybe a little more about what they value, and what they

09:36:13 think, and how they live their lives.

09:36:15 So this really played a role in helping us understand some

09:36:21 common goals for the region.

09:36:25 We hear a lot about economic development being tied to

09:36:28 mobility.

09:36:29 But what we don't hear is why people want economic

09:36:32 development.

09:36:33 It's really kind of a deep question to ask, but why do we

09:36:36 want that? Because we want to be proud of Tampa.

09:36:38 We want to be proud of this metropolitan area.

09:36:40 We want this to become a world class city.

09:36:43 And so for us, when we were working on this project, it was

09:36:46 very useful to kind of reach that level of depth of people.

09:36:50 And discover that there's this common goal, if you will, of

09:36:56 culture in addition to mobility and economic development.

09:36:59 There's got to be a reason, there's got to be some

09:37:04 engagement with the local city.

09:37:08 And so there's been a lot of great work done.

09:37:11 Done here in Tampa already, and we think this is just a

09:37:13 great way of visualizing how Tampa becomes a robust city,

09:37:18 not just thinking about a light rail system, for example,

09:37:21 but thinking about this is a vision that we have together.

09:37:24 This is a useful tool for us really out of the process.

09:37:29 In talking to all of these average Tampa folks, I was having

09:37:33 a conversation with this woman named Brandi, a single

09:37:36 mother, and she has two kids, and she told me she doesn't

09:37:39 like to ride the bus, and she doesn't go grocery shopping

09:37:42 where she would, but the problem is she doesn't know when

09:37:47 she has to pick up something and pick up her kid at any

09:37:50 given moment so it really illuminates something to us, these

09:37:54 something that may seem die meat metrically opposed to own a

09:37:59 car, to be a participant, or to ride mass transit, and that

09:38:03 weep thought about this a little further and we thought that

09:38:05 maybe this isn't diametrically opposite after all.

09:38:10 Maybe it's the map system can be looked at in different

09:38:17 ways, maybe amplify and change the way we build our buses,

09:38:20 and we build our mass systems and make them really personal

09:38:24 and make them super efficient and make them get to people

09:38:28 when people need them.

09:38:29 So this is a very abstract process.

09:38:31 This is what we call framework and this is one of our tools

09:38:35 that helps with solutions, for example.

09:38:39 Moving from an abstraction, moving from the beginning of the

09:38:42 design to envision the solution space.

09:38:47 I am going to give you a specific example of one of the

09:38:49 strategies.

09:38:55 Just again building off of insight, building off of talking

09:38:59 to people.

09:39:00 One of the key things we heard was people really have a

09:39:03 strong connection to sport.

09:39:05 And it's an emotional connection.

09:39:07 Tampa Bay has the love of the lightning, the Rays and the

09:39:10 Bucs, and it's wonderful.

09:39:11 And it's manifested because you can imagine that people

09:39:15 don't wear T-shirts of their airport, but they wear T-shirts

09:39:21 of the Tampa Bay Bucs or Jess jerseys.

09:39:26 This is something that people think about all the time,

09:39:29 behavior or sports.

09:39:30 So we recognize this.

09:39:32 And we were thinking about how might we achieve this vision

09:39:34 of culture, of economic growth, of mobility?

09:39:37 How do we achieve this using sports as like a weaver?

09:39:44 So we introduced this skipper card.

09:39:47 And we talked with Commissioner Sharpe in the county.

09:39:50 We talked to even some people in the private space already.

09:39:57 The Tampa Bay Lightning are very interested, but eventually

09:40:02 the plan here is that we are moving transit or mobility in

09:40:07 between citizens and their sports team.

09:40:11 And we are also seeking businesses and cultural entities as

09:40:16 well.

09:40:17 So there's a platform that we are proposing would be similar

09:40:21 to what TBARTA is trying to do, trying to get all of the

09:40:25 regional transit authorities together, and have one card

09:40:29 that you can swipe on any kind of system in the area.

09:40:33 This card would not only be tied to the transit authorities

09:40:36 and the transit lines, but it would also be tied to the

09:40:40 local lightning, so whenever you go to one of these

09:40:47 participating entities you would get points, get frequent

09:40:50 flyer points for Tampa super card or the Tampa region, you

09:40:54 get frequent flyer points, and these can be applied to

09:40:58 getting those lightning tickets.

09:41:00 So what we are doing here is we are using this really strong

09:41:03 emotional connection as a carrot.

09:41:07 And in the process we are creating a positive feedback.

09:41:10 We are creating -- we are making this really fun for people.

09:41:17 It's going to be on their phones.

09:41:20 They are going to be able to see in realtime where they are

09:41:22 in terms of reaching their goal and they are going to be

09:41:24 supporting the local economy, local businesses, handing

09:41:28 out -- boosting the local cultural experience.

09:41:31 And we found that this works.

09:41:33 We have touted this in California as well and behaviors

09:41:36 change.

09:41:37 So we are very excited about this.

09:41:39 This is one concept, and we think it can have a real

09:41:42 significant impact in terms of generating interest in

09:41:45 mobility.

09:41:46 Also furthering interest in this three-pronged approach that

09:41:53 we mentioned as well.

09:41:54 And in doing all of this, creating a change of mind-set.

09:42:00 Not only will getting around town or mobility be about

09:42:03 getting from point A to point B, but it's going to be about

09:42:06 exploring the world in between.

09:42:07 And it's going to be building that world as well.

09:42:11 So this that I presented to you, it's just a concept.

09:42:14 This is the kind of things that we can come up with, with

09:42:17 our transformation process, and Jaya is going to get into

09:42:23 what this means for the City of Tampa.

09:42:33 Jaya: I wanted to conclude what we are talking about here

09:42:36 withstand Ford university and how we see ourselves engaging

09:42:40 in this community.

09:42:43 We see the concepts that came out of the class as promising.

09:42:46 Of course, they are concepts.

09:42:51 They are ideas of how to move people into transit, how to

09:42:56 bring all of these stakeholders together, to a mutually

09:42:59 beneficial platform.

09:43:00 And so this is just one way, a nudge in the direction that

09:43:03 we are all looking to improve.

09:43:06 This is not -- we are not pro any form of technology.

09:43:11 We see that maybe there might be a type of technology that

09:43:19 appeals to people.

09:43:20 But this is not about that.

09:43:22 This is really about applying a process so that we can

09:43:25 co-create together like we did in Silicon Valley, like we

09:43:29 have done with other partners, the New Zealand government,

09:43:30 like the Rockefeller Foundation and Gates Foundation and

09:43:37 many more.

09:43:39 We want to start something like this in Tampa.

09:43:42 University of South Florida, sustainability, wants to work

09:43:44 on this with us.

09:43:45 They are willing to support us.

09:43:46 They have domain experts.

09:43:48 We think that together we can build a really strong future,

09:43:52 using the combined powers of both communities.

09:43:54 We think that Silicon Valley is a great innovation now, but

09:44:00 we see Tampa as a hub for innovation.

09:44:02 And we think it was that shared vision that when we talked

09:44:06 to USF, we saw ourselves aligned very well, and we see a

09:44:10 future here.

09:44:11 What are we asking from you?

09:44:13 We want to the co-create on this process and go through the

09:44:16 innovation transformation process with the city, with the

09:44:20 county, with private and public sectors, and in Tampa Bay,

09:44:24 but we need your support.

09:44:26 We want to see the project through.

09:44:29 This slide here, if we can get it on the screen, okay,

09:44:37 perfect.

09:44:38 So this just gives you an idea of how we see ourselves

09:44:42 moving forward.

09:44:43 We have done an eight-week deep dive where we explored with

09:44:48 students.

09:44:49 We think that we could co-create this process with city

09:44:52 officials, with government leaders, with private entities,

09:44:56 and either explore the concepts that we have come up with

09:45:00 already -- and again, this is the tip of the iceberg of

09:45:03 concepts that we have developed.

09:45:04 But then also co-create and see how we could craft a vision

09:45:09 around transit that brings everybody together.

09:45:11 So that's where we are at.

09:45:13 We are seeking your support.

09:45:15 We are looking forward to your support.

09:45:17 And we hope to continue this discussion.

09:45:18 >>HARRY COHEN: Questions or comments from council members?

09:45:23 Councilman Suarez.

09:45:23 >>MIKE SUAREZ: A couple of questions.

09:45:26 Thank you for the presentation.

09:45:30 A lot of good ideas in here.

09:45:32 I know they are concepts but what would the pilot that you

09:45:34 all did in California, Silicon Valley?

09:45:38 Was it specific to transit or was it some other issue?

09:45:42 >> So the pilot there was, you know, the city of San Jose

09:45:46 has thought that they wanted to create a platform called

09:45:49 Silicon Valley partnership, a platform that are would

09:45:53 engage, like I said, city government and private sector

09:45:57 leaders.

09:45:57 So basically coming and saying, we have a number of issues,

09:46:01 and we think that we are not leveraging the power of our

09:46:04 community as well as we could, because of we have volunteer

09:46:08 positions for maybe cleaning up the community.

09:46:11 But that doesn't appeal to a generation and programs --

09:46:18 >> So it wasn't to transit --

09:46:24 >> What we did in the workshop, we had teams of people break

09:46:27 out and take an issue that they wanted to work on after they

09:46:31 talked to each other, okay, these are city problems.

09:46:33 So one of the teams talked about transit.

09:46:37 One of the teams -- actually two of the teams talked about

09:46:40 city engagement and how do we get people engaged.

09:46:42 So, yeah, it was very diverse.

09:46:44 >> It was more wide ranging and not specific towards transit

09:46:48 per se?

09:46:49 >> Exactly, yes.

09:46:51 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I was just curious.

09:46:53 Because San Jose is part of that system, I wasn't sure how

09:46:57 that, would.

09:46:58 The second question I have, have the change labs ever done

09:47:01 any projects in the southeast all?

09:47:06 I mean, I know the name change lab.

09:47:10 I know what they have done in the past.

09:47:12 I have read up on it.

09:47:13 But have they done any projects in the south before?

09:47:15 >> No.

09:47:16 And, in fact, this is really coming here because I was part

09:47:20 of change lab at Stanford, came back to Tampa.

09:47:24 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I think that there is an entity called

09:47:28 change lab.

09:47:33 >> There may be some kind of branding going on here.

09:47:37 But this is the first project in the south that we would be

09:47:42 doing.

09:47:43 And then I also wanted to mention.

09:47:44 You were asking about what kind of topical issues in our

09:47:50 domain that we covered in Silicon Valley.

09:47:53 And to give you an example of some of the other work we are

09:47:57 doing, we work with energy efficiency, and in Germany a

09:48:00 fishery with Rockefeller.

09:48:03 So we are developing world challenges with gates.

09:48:07 So this methodology can be applied to a huge range of

09:48:10 potential large-scale issues.

09:48:13 But we have been documenting transit here and we see a huge

09:48:18 impact.

09:48:19 Tampa Bay is kind of -- much the I-4 corridor, huge impact

09:48:28 potential for us.

09:48:30 So that's why it's exciting.

09:48:32 >>MIKE SUAREZ: As part of the methodology that you use, I

09:48:34 mean, there's a few things that I thought of when I was

09:48:37 looking at this, and weather and the type of culture, race.

09:48:46 How much of that rolls into the methodology that you use,

09:48:52 you know?

09:48:52 Because when you talk about conceptual parameters, or

09:48:56 paradigms, you know, you are looking at something that is

09:49:00 devoid of those things that may make people react in certain

09:49:06 ways, you know.

09:49:07 It may be a little different at Silicon Valley than it is

09:49:12 here, and part of the reasons for transit, especially, is

09:49:15 there is a weather component to it, there is a racial

09:49:18 component to it, there is a cultural component to it that

09:49:23 has to be looked at, because, you know, you probably know

09:49:27 the old story about Ford and trying to produce a car in the

09:49:31 70s down in South America, and they had this wonderful car

09:49:35 that was created specifically for that market, and it was

09:49:39 cheap, it was fuel efficient, everything else, except for

09:49:41 one thing, the name of the car was NOVA, whip means one

09:49:47 thing in English and means "doesn't go" in Spanish.

09:49:51 So they made that mistake.

09:49:53 My point is those aspects of everything that makes up Tampa

09:49:57 and Tampa Bay is significantly different.

09:50:01 The only thing we share as the Silicon Valley area, there's

09:50:08 a big bay nearby.

09:50:09 And weather and other things are completely different.

09:50:14 And one of the reasons that hi ask is that I'm on Hart board

09:50:19 and one of the things we talk about is the difference

09:50:21 between riders that heir choice riders versus people that

09:50:27 need to ride mass transit.

09:50:29 There is a distinct cultural difference in what people --

09:50:34 and I'm a third generation Tampanian -- what we think about

09:50:38 the buses as southerners versus what people think about

09:50:41 buses up north or out west, and that is a huge cultural

09:50:47 hurdle that we need to talk about.

09:50:49 That's why I wanted to ask about, and tell me, what is part

09:50:53 of that when you look at it, all those other things?

09:50:57 >> Jaya: I'm so glad you asked that question, because

09:51:00 that's really what's so fascinating about this change lab

09:51:03 approach.

09:51:03 And the reason that, you know, Silicon Valley would each be

09:51:10 thinking about the projects where the mind sets are

09:51:13 completely different.

09:51:14 So one of the biggest pieces of this process is

09:51:18 understanding mind sets and cultural norms and really

09:51:24 designing appropriate technology, appropriate intervention.

09:51:27 And so developing world projects where often you see

09:51:34 companies go into these countries where, you know, my

09:51:38 familiar reply is originally from India, and I grew up sort

09:51:43 of understanding -- you would see intervention happen there

09:51:48 that wouldn't align.

09:51:49 You know, people would get these technologies and then they

09:51:52 would throw them away.

09:51:53 So maybe that was product specific.

09:51:55 But what change labs did, and what is happening is really

09:52:00 deeply understanding cultural norms, we think that we can

09:52:03 get at a better solution.

09:52:05 And that's why we think that this process really was, and

09:52:10 you mention Hart.

09:52:11 And I want to mention that we think that these types of

09:52:14 innovations are in parallel with the work happening at these

09:52:20 places.

09:52:21 So we really want to just come as an ally of this process.

09:52:25 One of the things I didn't mention was that, you know, we

09:52:28 are very much about not having to have other agencies speak

09:52:33 out again and again and again.

09:52:35 So we don't -- I mean, we are an academic institute.

09:52:42 We like to have people take what we do and then not need us

09:52:45 again.

09:52:46 So that's just another piece.

09:52:48 >>MIKE SUAREZ: One last question.

09:52:50 In terms of some of the innovations we are talking about,

09:52:53 the skipper card, which I think is a great idea, some of the

09:53:02 legal problems associated with that, because, as an example,

09:53:07 we, as a Hart board, cannot provide service specific to --

09:53:13 it has to be public and it has to be open to everyone.

09:53:16 That's per federal laws.

09:53:17 And we are limited built type of services that we provide

09:53:22 because of that.

09:53:22 There's lots of different touchstones that we have to be

09:53:26 aware of before we can do any of this other stuff.

09:53:28 So I know that this again is just conceptual.

09:53:33 And I am not trying to say, well, I know that is correct we

09:53:35 can't do any of this stuff.

09:53:36 But that's, I assume, an important part of how change lab

09:53:40 goes into it.

09:53:41 The second part of it is that you did a Nace presentation,

09:53:45 and a fairly good close except for one thing.

09:53:48 You didn't specifically site what you want from us, and we

09:53:51 would like to have that.

09:53:53 Tell us exactly Wan you need so that we can know how we can

09:53:56 help you out.

09:53:57 So if you can answer that.

09:53:58 >> Yes, absolutely.

09:54:00 And I would love to answer the second one, too.

09:54:04 The first one, I think you are absolutely right, that

09:54:08 there's some legal challenges.

09:54:14 You mentioned all sorts of hoops of that we would have to

09:54:16 jump through.

09:54:17 We have an idea of introducing different kind of for-profit

09:54:21 entity that the operator, and this kind of skipper system,

09:54:26 and coordinator and different parties.

09:54:30 And that was our initial idea around it.

09:54:33 But going back to what you were saying, the first question

09:54:36 of Jaya, you are absolutely right about the challenges that

09:54:39 are local, the fact that it's 100 degrees out here every

09:54:44 day, in Silicon Valley, 75º at this time of the year.

09:54:48 That's why people don't want to wait at the bus stop.

09:54:51 We heard that over and over again.

09:54:52 Some people would consider taking it if they had to sweat

09:54:56 and so on.

09:54:57 So these kind of insights are powerful, and we diabetes

09:55:01 consider them in our process, but that's why we need to come

09:55:05 in and work with you, because we had this kind of bank of

09:55:08 knowledge.

09:55:09 There's only so far we can get like developing these skipper

09:55:12 concepts remotely.

09:55:13 I just want to emphasize the co-creation aspect.

09:55:17 We do consider these things.

09:55:18 But then it's only as good as it can be.

09:55:22 From 3,000 miles away.

09:55:24 >> Jaya: In seeing what we are asking from you, and Adam,

09:55:34 feel free to add to this, but we want to develop these

09:55:36 concepts, or new concepts together.

09:55:39 And so what we are proposing is doing a deep dive, and

09:55:42 working with the community.

09:55:44 Of course, that's going to take a number of supporters, not

09:55:49 just verbal supporters, but financial supporters, so that we

09:55:53 can go and make this a possibility.

09:55:56 So, you know, I don't know in what capacity you guys can

09:56:02 support us, but that's really where we are at, is that we

09:56:05 really want to see these concepts through.

09:56:07 We need that kind of support.

09:56:12 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Ms. Montelione?

09:56:13 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Thank you, Mr. Chair.

09:56:15 We have already gotten a down payment in the form of

09:56:19 stanford's contribution that I mention board of director 20

09:56:23 to $30,000 that Stanford already put a number of dollars

09:56:27 behind the funding initially.

09:56:29 So the ability of others to at least match Stanford's

09:56:36 contribution would be fabulous.

09:56:39 As they mentioned, we have been out talking to many

09:56:43 different stakeholders in this system, in this process, and

09:56:50 the amount of support, verbal commitment that they have been

09:56:55 able to get from very high level individuals at key spaces

09:57:02 within this community in a week or less is phenomenal.

09:57:10 I mean, I can't say enough about the outstanding work of

09:57:13 these two young people who have been able to communicate

09:57:19 this process, and what we will be left with, and what we

09:57:24 like to say is that when they are done, we are not just left

09:57:29 with what we learned about the particular issue that they

09:57:33 were examining, and in this case we are talking about

09:57:35 transit, and the ties to economic development, and job

09:57:39 creation, and all of those issues.

09:57:42 But we left with the process that we can use time and time

09:57:47 again, and that's one of the things that really got me

09:57:49 excited about Stanford when I first started talking with

09:57:54 Jaya over a year ago, as that they want to take their

09:57:59 process and hand it over to the community, so we can apply

09:58:03 that process across the many different issues that face our

09:58:08 city and our region.

09:58:09 And we all talk about, you know, being a regional player,

09:58:13 and the only way that we can stand on the same footing with

09:58:18 Atlanta as an economic center of the south is if we come

09:58:24 together regionally, if we act as one voice in the Tampa Bay

09:58:30 area and bring together the gateway area of St. Petersburg

09:58:35 and bring together the Westshore area of the City of Tampa.

09:58:39 We are the second largest regional employment center in the

09:58:42 south.

09:58:43 Second only to Atlanta.

09:58:45 So we talk about comparisons to Charlotte or Raleigh-Durham,

09:58:51 but really we should be on footing with much larger cities.

09:58:55 I mean, dare I even say New York or Chicago or Los Angeles

09:58:58 or Silicon Valley area.

09:59:00 So we have the opportunity to be really step onto that

09:59:04 national stage.

09:59:05 We hear from our economic development folks when they come

09:59:09 to us seeking support for support industry tax credits, that

09:59:14 the companies that are looking to locate here are looking

09:59:16 at -- they are looking at London.

09:59:18 They are looking at Brazil.

09:59:21 They are looking at, you know, countries around the world.

09:59:24 They could be located in Maccow.

09:59:29 It doesn't matter anymore with technology where you are

09:59:32 physically located.

09:59:33 So if we are going to step onto that type of stage we have

09:59:35 to do it from a much larger base.

09:59:38 And I think it this process is just the first step in

09:59:40 bringing us there.

09:59:41 So one of the statements that was made, that you brought up,

09:59:47 Mr. Suarez, is very important to me, and that was the two

09:59:54 things that they worked on in Silicon Valley partnership

09:59:59 which brought me to this regional type of process that you

10:00:05 have got, San Jose, all coming together, saying, hey, we can

10:00:10 make more using of our partners if we leverage our strength

10:00:13 together.

10:00:13 And bringing together these companies like Google and CISCO

10:00:18 and Pricewaterhouse and eBay and bringing those corporate

10:00:23 giants in but having them stand along mayors, city leaders,

10:00:27 City Council, the extraordinary citizens who want to engage

10:00:31 are ordinary people but they are extraordinarily in

10:00:35 engagement because it takes a lot for people to come out,

10:00:38 take time out of their busy lives and schedules to come and

10:00:41 engage with us.

10:00:42 They have got other things to do.

10:00:44 But it's the strength of our citizens who want that

10:00:46 engagement.

10:00:47 We saw people cry out for that when we attended the

10:00:50 transportation with economic leadership meeting that was

10:00:53 held at county center.

10:00:54 We saw over 100 people show up to tell us that they want to

10:00:58 see transformative changes in the area, and they took time

10:01:02 out in the evening, the three hours, to tell us how

10:01:06 important that was to them.

10:01:08 So the city engagement piece is something that I really am

10:01:14 very interested in, and it's what we are left with after --

10:01:20 because we'll get through this transit.

10:01:23 I'm sure we'll get through it one way or the other, and

10:01:26 having you work on this is going to help us get there.

10:01:31 But it's the process that we are left with that really

10:01:35 excites me.

10:01:36 Because I don't know about the rest of us, but I am

10:01:39 contacted all the time, and it's something I am going to

10:01:42 bring up in our next workshop today about our rules of

10:01:46 procedure.

10:01:47 But I'm contacted all the time about how can we engage our

10:01:52 citizens better when we have a full 9:00 a.m. agenda and

10:01:57 they can't be here to talk to us about it?

10:01:59 So can you elaborate?

10:02:02 >> Yes, that's actually very interesting that you brought

10:02:06 that up.

10:02:06 One of the teams that was working at the workshop in San

10:02:12 Jose was actually focused on the engagement piece alone, and

10:02:18 they went through this, you know, process, and decided that

10:02:21 they wanted to do City Council meetings and it's really a

10:02:31 giant leap from where they were at to where they came to,

10:02:35 and they said that because they realize -- and Tampa mayor

10:02:41 on that same platform was thinking of these ideas, but they

10:02:45 saw the ways that they are currently engaging are not

10:02:48 targeting their audience in that strategic of a way.

10:02:53 So that aside, I think that was four hours of a workshop.

10:02:58 You really just think, just scratch the surface at that

10:03:01 point.

10:03:02 We think of course the deep dive Get you into it.

10:03:04 And you can see the slide that we have up.

10:03:08 We really do believe in not just co-creating within

10:03:11 government, but using the power of our citizens and of Tampa

10:03:16 to co-create.

10:03:17 And I think that if you have the right process -- society

10:03:21 another one of the insights that came out of the workshop is

10:03:25 that it worked well because we had a process.

10:03:27 And had we not had the process, we would have just --

10:03:37 talking about user means instead of agendas as we came in.

10:03:41 And the minute people became citizens and started talking to

10:03:44 each other and they weren't the Google executive, they

10:03:48 aren't even the mayor of the city but they were the citizens

10:03:50 of the city, their whole approach to the problem

10:03:53 transformed, and I think than is one of the really big

10:03:57 insights into the process.

10:03:58 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Can you talk about co-creation?

10:04:05 Because we have all been to workshops where you have a pad

10:04:08 of Sticky Notes and put it on a board or you sit around a

10:04:13 table and share ideas.

10:04:14 But I think co-creation means different things to different

10:04:20 people.

10:04:20 >> Well, you know, co-creation, in our mind, is not just

10:04:26 engaging in these workshops, but using again, like I said,

10:04:29 the process.

10:04:31 So rather than, you know, just random -- which can be great

10:04:37 because you get people into a generative mode.

10:04:42 We real focus on the power of questions.

10:04:44 And there are questions and there are questions and there

10:04:46 are questions.

10:04:47 The more you ask, the more you find.

10:04:49 So the way we channel co-creation is first by asking

10:04:54 everybody asking questions, getting at the root cause, and

10:04:58 that's how we align people on this co-creative platform.

10:05:02 You have people form these teams.

10:05:04 As they are doing it, they are actually asking deeper

10:05:06 questions, and those questions are leading to even deeper

10:05:10 insights.

10:05:11 Insights that we all have.

10:05:13 They are sitting around in our heads.

10:05:15 But until you are sort of forced to ask that question, you

10:05:19 may not be the unique approach you would have thought of

10:05:23 initially.

10:05:24 So this isn't about saying that people here haven't thought

10:05:28 about these issues.

10:05:29 I think it's about the way that we are thinking about these

10:05:32 issues.

10:05:32 And that's why, you know, change labs, and design school,

10:05:37 which is basically a meeting ground for people from

10:05:39 engineering, business schools, from the psychology schools,

10:05:44 from every Avenue at Stanford, why this hub has become an

10:05:48 innovation hub, because it's allowed all of these different

10:05:53 schools of thought to come together, and ask better

10:05:56 questions.

10:06:00 Adam: I'll just add kind of a tangible game or technique

10:06:04 that is correct we use to make it more -- to connect more to

10:06:09 it.

10:06:10 Instead of coming up in a brainstorm and maybe it's common

10:06:15 in this world that are we live in to say, okay, your idea is

10:06:20 good, but I don't think it's going to work, or it's good but

10:06:24 here are our restrictions.

10:06:26 What we do is we say, yes and ...

10:06:32 So Jay and I did this before last week, we brainstormed, and

10:06:37 created stories, and guided our brainstorming, but you build

10:06:40 off one another.

10:06:41 And in my having to accept something and putting yourself on

10:06:44 the line, taking this kind of chance, putting yourself in

10:06:47 the mode where you can fail, but it's okay to be fail.

10:06:51 This is the kind of space we are looking for.

10:06:53 This is the kind of space where creativity can be for people

10:06:58 like me who are engineers who are not creative at all, this

10:07:01 is whereby we aim.

10:07:03 We aim for the space of openness, of deep understanding of

10:07:06 each other, and only in this space can you develop the kind

10:07:11 of creative groundbreaking and game changing solutions that

10:07:18 we are discussing here.

10:07:20 So that's co-creation.

10:07:21 And we need space to develop that co-creation.

10:07:26 >> And just to add to that, one last bit is that, you know,

10:07:33 often what happens in the early stages of innovation is when

10:07:37 you keep saying "yes but" you limit yourself.

10:07:41 This is not about saying we are not very analytical.

10:07:45 I mean, there is a time period where being very critical and

10:07:50 analytical.

10:07:51 Not just the first phase of the project.

10:07:53 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Thank you.

10:07:55 And that's something that we all need to work oh on, I

10:07:58 think, the road blocks.

10:08:00 You know, we all face them.

10:08:02 Each one of us and things that we have championed before.

10:08:06 When you talk to people, they say, well, either it's never

10:08:11 been done that way before, or, you know, we have got these

10:08:14 regulations, or we have got these commitments, and to take

10:08:20 us out of that mind-set and say "yes and" and replace that

10:08:31 with "but" because the "but" is always on the negative side,

10:08:39 that we can't do than but we can do that, and it always up

10:08:44 to a more collaborative process.

10:08:46 Thank you very much for your time.

10:08:48 And I am going to continue to champion to help make this

10:08:53 process with change labs happen, and work on partnering with

10:08:59 the University of South Florida, which Stanford university

10:09:02 and the rest of the stakeholders here.

10:09:05 Thank you.

10:09:07 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you all very much.

10:09:08 We now go to item number 4, city review regarding the

10:09:11 cameras we have had in place for a year or so.

10:09:18 >> It's my pleasure to be here on behalf of the Tampa Police

10:09:20 Department and Chief Castor to do this review.

10:09:24 I believe as you recall last year, the stage was set to

10:09:27 basically go over what progress a year later the cameras

10:09:31 have --

10:09:34 >> Your name?

10:09:34 >> Captain Mike Balmeister, Tampa Police Department.

10:09:40 Everybody has a copy of this.

10:09:41 If not I can provide one for you.

10:09:49 If there are some specific questions to come back a year

10:09:52 later, I am going to go over some of the questions and give

10:09:54 you answers on what we have done.

10:09:57 One of the questions is review how the program has worked in

10:10:03 a year.

10:10:04 In here, we have some statistics to show some crime

10:10:08 reductions that happened in the downtown area but we also

10:10:10 have some stories of some successes that the cameras have

10:10:17 provided for us.

10:10:17 I am going to go over some of the highlights of them.

10:10:20 I am not going to go over all of them because we'll be here

10:10:23 for a while.

10:10:24 But as you recall last year, November 2012, we had a sexual

10:10:28 battery suspect in one of the parking garages downtown.

10:10:31 And because of those cameras we were able to quickly

10:10:33 apprehend him.

10:10:34 We were able to follow the individual all the way to the

10:10:36 park.

10:10:37 He changed his clothes.

10:10:38 We were able to get officers in there pretty quick.

10:10:40 He wasn't successful, thank goodness, and we were able to

10:10:45 apprehend him F.those cameras weren't in place we probably

10:10:48 would not have identified him as quickly and the likelihood

10:10:52 he would have continued his math until he was successful.

10:10:55 That was a good win for us utilizing the cameras.

10:10:58 We have also shared these cameras with our neighboring

10:11:01 agencies.

10:11:02 St. Pete police department contacted us last year for the

10:11:05 Grand Prix, St. Pete Grand Prix.

10:11:08 We were able to send all our trailers over and they were

10:11:11 able to use that for their large event, and it proved to be

10:11:15 very successful for them.

10:11:16 They were able to see what was going on and monitor the

10:11:18 blind spots so they know all the people out there were safe.

10:11:23 Boca Raton asked us to share our cameras with them, also, so

10:11:29 we deployed our trailers over there to a political event

10:11:32 last year and they were very thankful for doing that.

10:11:36 In Ybor City, there was a homicide suspect that arrived, and

10:11:41 we knew was coming, we were able to monitor with cameras and

10:11:44 watch him come and then able to apprehend him real quick and

10:11:48 put him in custody.

10:11:49 That was another success we had.

10:11:52 And some of the other things we have done, some of our

10:11:55 cameras that we are able to move around and put big banners

10:11:58 on them, put on blue lights, made them very overt.

10:12:03 We put them in parking lots of shopping.

10:12:07 We let everybody know that Tampa Police Department is here,

10:12:10 we are watching.

10:12:10 You go in there and steal, we are going to be able to

10:12:13 apprehend you fairly quickly.

10:12:15 So in those parking lots we have noticed a reduction so just

10:12:22 that has helped us in reducing other criminal activity.

10:12:27 We used them all through the summer initiatives, and in the

10:12:30 parks, to make sure the kids were safe, that there was no

10:12:35 problems in the park, and gangs might be gathering, and we

10:12:39 were able to deploy quickly.

10:12:42 These are just some examples of some of the things we have

10:12:44 done with them.

10:12:45 And it really assisted us in doing our job.

10:12:50 The other thing is the procedures that we employ.

10:12:55 We draft add standard operating procedure and we did some

10:12:57 research on it.

10:12:58 We didn't just come up with this H.we looked at other areas

10:13:01 and looked at the procedures that they use.

10:13:02 We took that all in.

10:13:04 We did some looking at some legal aspects, case law, and

10:13:07 seeing how privacy and all that was determined it through

10:13:12 the court justice system, and one big case that we stated in

10:13:16 our policy is Katz versus United States about fourth

10:13:23 amendment privacy and privacy and all.

10:13:27 That we put in strict retention guidelines.

10:13:30 The video is stored for 30 days and dropped off unless

10:13:34 something happens F.something happens then we can retain it

10:13:36 for 120 days before it becomes evidence.

10:13:38 And then we put it into evidence.

10:13:40 After that, the video will then be recycled.

10:13:44 Everybody that uses the system has their own user name and

10:13:47 has to have their own log-in.

10:13:49 We don't let anybody share this.

10:13:51 We can audit what people are doing with the cameras.

10:13:53 And we are restrict on who we give access to the cameras.

10:13:57 They have to have reason to have it.

10:13:58 If there's no reason, then they don't get it.

10:14:00 If there's a reason, then they have to specify what they are

10:14:03 looking for and we give them access to only part of the

10:14:06 system.

10:14:16 We also went over how to get access, go through the city

10:14:19 legal department and do a public records request.

10:14:23 Some traffic accidents that happened in the downtown area,

10:14:26 the cameras will catch it.

10:14:28 It's very helpful in determining what occurred and then when

10:14:31 it becomes a civil issue, somebody can come in and request

10:14:33 video for their case.

10:14:35 So we do provide that.

10:14:40 Like I said, the other review of the program single-family I

10:14:45 stated some crime statistics in the packet.

10:14:47 We have a 23% reduction of crime in the downtown area.

10:14:51 I am not going to say it was all because of the cameras.

10:14:54 We didn't focus on that study.

10:14:55 But just in that area, I believe that the cameras had part

10:14:59 of the impact was police work, putting them in the right

10:15:02 places, and just the whole mission of the Tampa Police

10:15:04 Department to reduce crime.

10:15:06 They were just another tool that we use in our tool box to

10:15:08 help with that.

10:15:09 And the statistics show that in that area, since last year,

10:15:12 23% less crime happened when the cameras are up.

10:15:18 And in there it pretty much discusses everything asked of

10:15:22 us.

10:15:23 If you have any more questions, we will be glad to answer

10:15:26 them for you.

10:15:27 >>MARY MULHERN: Thanks for giving us your report, for

10:15:35 meeting with me individually of the I have more questions

10:15:38 than I had with you earlier.

10:15:41 Mr. Feneger, but I will ask you these questions before he

10:15:51 speaks.

10:15:53 I'm not sure about this question.

10:15:55 He wants to know how many times you have actually -- police

10:15:59 actually checked the camera.

10:16:01 So I guess that question is --

10:16:07 >> We don't do wide monitoring on the cameras at all.

10:16:10 How the cameras work.

10:16:12 If there's a correct me if I am wrong or something that

10:16:13 happens, then we review back.

10:16:16 Let's say that we have a burglary in the downtown area.

10:16:20 We look to see if it may have caught something in there to

10:16:22 maybe identify a suspect.

10:16:25 But we don't live monitor.

10:16:27 >> If you have a suspicion of something or report of

10:16:30 something that you can go back and look at the cameras?

10:16:34 >> Yes.

10:16:34 >>MARY MULHERN: Can you figure out how often does that

10:16:37 happen?

10:16:38 >> Well, I would say that happens -- it depends on what's

10:16:43 occurring.

10:16:44 It probably happens weekly.

10:16:45 I wouldn't same daily but weekly.

10:16:47 A lot of times, they will just ask us if the camera -- we

10:16:51 are not really going do go in the video because we know the

10:16:55 cameras aren't in that area but we get requests of all the

10:16:58 time of detectives in areas that may have had little crime

10:17:02 sprees.

10:17:03 We can't keep them in one place.

10:17:07 We are always asked to put them in different hot spots of

10:17:11 criminal activity.

10:17:12 So those cameras tend to get reviewed a little bit more,

10:17:15 because they are specific for a problem that's occurring.

10:17:17 >>MARY MULHERN: You are being asked bill your officers for

10:17:20 those are?

10:17:21 >> By the supervisors.

10:17:23 And usually it will flow up sometimes through the detectives

10:17:30 or the commanders.

10:17:31 Not saying there's -- if we have one available, and if to

10:17:39 make sure we are doing it correctly.

10:17:41 >>MARY MULHERN: I know you gave us that one example, which

10:17:43 I think that happened back right when you first got the

10:17:47 cameras in 2012.

10:17:49 But how many times have you actually identified?

10:17:55 >> You know, it's hard to get information back from people.

10:17:58 I always ask detectives, send me some good stories.

10:18:01 What have you done with them?

10:18:02 We have identified some different burglar aspects.

10:18:06 We solved crimes.

10:18:07 And I can't give you a specific number, because I don't

10:18:09 always get that.

10:18:10 You know, we are kind of in charge of the cameras.

10:18:12 But they are the users of it so we really don't have hard

10:18:17 statistics.

10:18:18 >>MARY MULHERN: I think we need to do know that.

10:18:21 We are not voting on anything today.

10:18:22 But when we are asked to appropriate money for this, we need

10:18:25 to know that they are actually being effective.

10:18:29 So maybe before it comes to us for a vote to renew that

10:18:34 contract, you could get some data that shows us how often

10:18:40 you are actually identifying people from the cameras.

10:18:43 Because this is a lot of money.

10:18:52 Then I didn't think about this when we were talking the

10:18:54 other day, but the public records request, when you get a

10:18:57 request for access to those, who can ask for that?

10:19:03 Can anybody call you and say, I would like to see the camera

10:19:08 from Ashley and --

10:19:11 >> Well, what they have to do is give a specific date and

10:19:15 time of the areas they are looking for, and then there's

10:19:17 actually a cost governed by the State of Florida for pulling

10:19:20 those records.

10:19:20 Because that takes time for somebody to review them.

10:19:23 So through our legal department, there's a person in there.

10:19:26 That's what they do.

10:19:27 So then they have given an estimate of how much time it

10:19:31 would take and what the cost is and then make a decision

10:19:35 whether to try to pull video for them.

10:19:38 A lot of times they don't know if they are going to have

10:19:40 something or they won't.

10:19:42 So they'll make the determination, and then once that's

10:19:45 done, then we'll look it up and if it's there we'll provide

10:19:49 it to them.

10:19:49 >> But anyone can do that?

10:19:51 >> Yes.

10:19:51 >> Anyone in the audience could call you and say, I need to

10:19:54 see that video from whichever camera?

10:19:59 >> Yes, and provide what area they are looking for, a time

10:20:03 and a date, and they can specifically ask for what are they

10:20:05 want the video for.

10:20:07 And then that will be provided to them.

10:20:09 But like I said, there's a cost that's associated with it.

10:20:12 >>MARY MULHERN: So how do you determine?

10:20:16 Can you say no?

10:20:17 Is there any reason to say no?

10:20:19 >> Normally, no.

10:20:23 Yes, we give it to anybody who asks.

10:20:25 If we are doing something specific with the video like an

10:20:29 internal investigation and there's something, until an

10:20:33 internal investigation is done and it's part of evidence,

10:20:35 that might be a reason why we won't give it.

10:20:37 But we haven't come across that yet.

10:20:39 I just want to give you a what-if.

10:20:42 >>MARY MULHERN: I hadn't really thought about that too

10:20:43 much.

10:20:43 But I think that's kind of disturbing because someone could

10:20:46 be following someone, or shadowing someone.

10:20:52 >> Florida public records law requires us to be very open

10:20:56 with the records.

10:20:58 >>MARY MULHERN: So once you are filming --

10:20:59 >> Remember, the video is gone in 30 days.

10:21:02 So after 30 days retention overrides it.

10:21:04 So unless it's within that 30-day window, there is no access

10:21:09 to it anymore.

10:21:09 We don't even have it.

10:21:10 >>MARY MULHERN: But I guess the other question is -- and

10:21:17 these are all questions I would like to have answered -- and

10:21:20 I will put it in writing before we come back and really make

10:21:24 a decision about whether we are going to continue to use

10:21:27 these.

10:21:29 It would be good to have answers.

10:21:31 Movable cameras, can we get -- it I don't know, if you gave

10:21:36 us that report of where all the stationery ones, but the

10:21:40 movable ones, if we could get a record of where they are

10:21:43 being used?

10:21:45 >> Well, we can go back and same where they have been used

10:21:47 and provide that at the different locations.

10:21:50 Sometimes we really don't want to put that out there in the

10:21:53 public area because we might be looking for burglars

10:21:57 suspects and we just don't want the burglars to know that

10:21:59 there's maybe a camera in the area.

10:22:01 Buff that would be the only reason why.

10:22:03 But for intents and purposes we can provide all the

10:22:06 locations to you.

10:22:06 >>MARY MULHERN: I think we need to know that just to make

10:22:10 sure that it's not profiling, that the cameras are only

10:22:13 being used in certain areas.

10:22:16 >> Yes, we can do that.

10:22:18 And we use it too at a Bucs games for traffic monitoring.

10:22:23 It doesn't only have to be criminal.

10:22:25 It could be traffic control.

10:22:26 It could be an event.

10:22:27 It could be for anything that we know that the cameras will

10:22:30 be a useful tool for us so we don't have to deploy as many

10:22:34 officers in that area.

10:22:36 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

10:22:38 I just hope, council, that we'll all do our re search and

10:22:42 think about this pretty hard because I know that -- I'm not

10:22:46 comfortable with them.

10:22:47 I know that -- I think I was alone in that not wanting to

10:22:51 have the cameras in the first place.

10:22:55 But I think we should think about really strict ordinances

10:23:00 about how they are used, because it's a pretty big

10:23:03 responsibility to know that they are out there.

10:23:05 And the fact that they are out there and people don't

10:23:08 necessarily know, you know, that they are there.

10:23:11 I like the fact that you are advertising them.

10:23:12 >> Yes, we do advertise them.

10:23:14 >>MARY MULHERN: People know they are there at least.

10:23:18 But I hope we will think long and hard about this.

10:23:22 And I guess the other question for you, can you show us,

10:23:28 just strictly in terms of reducing crime, and more canines,

10:23:43 and I just think of all the things we should do, and have

10:23:46 some of these questions, if you can answer them might tell

10:23:48 us, but we should be able to justify, that maybe we could be

10:23:56 hiring people.

10:23:56 >> The cameras have been done now and it's just a

10:24:02 maintenance issue and we have no plans of expanding

10:24:05 anything.

10:24:05 That's where it gets costly.

10:24:06 And Councilman Reddick last year had an issue with illegal

10:24:10 dumping, and we found a better solution to help solve that

10:24:13 with using more inexpensive cameras that are more affordable

10:24:19 for that.

10:24:19 >> How much is the contract if we renew it for another year?

10:24:23 >> The contract as it was written for using a company that

10:24:26 be we currently use, we asked them when we initially put the

10:24:30 bid out to give us a second year estimate, and the estimate

10:24:33 they gave us was $1,646,000 to renew it for the following

10:24:37 year with that same company.

10:24:38 Now we are going to look at other ways to maybe bring that

10:24:41 cost down.

10:24:44 Picking backing off other companies that are local, and

10:24:47 possibly looking at maybe doing some of the maintenance

10:24:49 ourselves.

10:24:50 So we are going to try to see what we can do to try to

10:24:52 reduce some of those costs.

10:24:54 But that's the basic costs, and the answer that I can give

10:24:58 you tangible.

10:25:00 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Mr. Reddick and Mr. Cohen.

10:25:03 In that order.

10:25:03 >>FRANK REDDICK: Thank you, Mr. Chair.

10:25:07 Yesterday when we discussed this, I told you that I wanted

10:25:13 to read more in detail.

10:25:15 I just have a few questions.

10:25:16 And the first one is, how many law enforcement agencies do

10:25:21 you know of in the State of Florida are utilizing cameras?

10:25:25 >> I don't know all the agencies.

10:25:27 I know Hillsborough County does, the sheriff's office.

10:25:30 They have some cameras.

10:25:34 St. Pete, I believe, has some.

10:25:35 They put some during the RNC.

10:25:39 I don't know if the detective knows some of the counts.

10:25:43 But I know locally there's cameras around.

10:25:45 I can't talk about all over Florida.

10:25:46 I know when we are looking to install these, we inspected

10:25:50 cameras throughout the State of Florida.

10:25:51 We actually went over to Miami.

10:25:53 We think went to, I think, Fort Myers, and some of those

10:25:57 areas had cameras that were installed for this type of

10:26:00 function.

10:26:00 And we looked at how their systems work, where we can

10:26:04 educate ourselves on what we were doing when we were doing

10:26:06 the bid.

10:26:07 So I know there is more than one place than just Florida.

10:26:10 There are some studies in here that I think have some

10:26:12 cameras in Chicago.

10:26:13 And the other place that we found a study for some stats

10:26:18 that they had was Baltimore.

10:26:21 So I know those cities do, and New York.

10:26:23 >> And let me follow up.

10:26:28 A listing in section 3, take Washington, D.C., for example.

10:26:34 Safety violent crimes, deadly weapons down significantly but

10:26:42 cameras were not solely responsible for the drop.

10:26:45 So crime went down, but they don't -- they are not saying

10:26:52 that cameras played a significant role.

10:26:53 >> It's a hard thing to come out here and say that the

10:26:56 cameras are specifically the drop.

10:26:57 And that's why even in our stuff we can't do than because

10:27:01 the crime went down.

10:27:03 That means something didn't occur.

10:27:04 And we are trying to look at what we have done as a police

10:27:07 department to prevent that.

10:27:08 And some of it could be cameras.

10:27:10 Some of it could be an aggressive officer just in that area

10:27:13 doing a little better police work.

10:27:14 So it's a really hard item to kind of get a tangible moment

10:27:18 to say actually stand up here and same that's the reason.

10:27:22 But, you know, I would believe, just knowing that there's a

10:27:28 camera in place, would tend to keep someone from committing

10:27:32 some type of crime, and we would be able to review them and

10:27:36 see who is doing it.

10:27:38 >>FRANK REDDICK: And I am going to move to Chicago, for

10:27:40 example.

10:27:40 We all know about Chicago.

10:27:43 We hear about it every day on TV.

10:27:45 And a significant captain number of people are, killed.

10:27:50 And they are one of the cities that utilize cameras.

10:27:54 But the crime rate has not dropped, because people get

10:27:58 murdered every day.

10:28:00 In the last week seven people got shot outside side a

10:28:05 church.

10:28:05 But one thing I did notice that went up, prostitution went

10:28:09 up in Chicago.

10:28:11 But robbery went down.

10:28:15 But prostitution went up.

10:28:17 And the murders did not change.

10:28:19 And a comparison to say cameras play a significant role in

10:28:29 reducing crime in the community.

10:28:31 And I am going to start there R.but one other item I had,

10:28:36 Mr. Chair.

10:28:37 And that is, I notice where you say covert cameras used to

10:28:42 manage crowds.

10:28:47 Are those cameras visible?

10:28:49 >> They are visible.

10:28:50 What we mean by covert is we don't advertise them with

10:28:53 banners on them.

10:28:54 There's cameras but they don't know who put them up there.

10:28:56 There are trailers, and you can't hide them.

10:28:59 If you have seen them they are pretty large.

10:29:01 So they are up there.

10:29:03 But we don't put the Tampa Police Department banner on them.

10:29:06 We kind of want people to have feel free being in the park.

10:29:09 But we are able to monitor a large area of the park without

10:29:13 actually putting officers in there.

10:29:15 They keep us from having to use all of our resources in

10:29:18 there at one time.

10:29:19 You know, had one camera can take place of 15 to 20 officers

10:29:23 in a crowd to try to keep -- when they can monitor and make

10:29:27 sure they are just having fun in the park and not doing

10:29:30 anything wrong.

10:29:30 >>FRANK REDDICK: And you don't consider that -- I want to

10:29:42 use the right word here -- a person paid to rent those

10:29:52 shelters for cookout, and the people go out to the park, and

10:29:56 I guess with family and friends and want to have an

10:29:59 entertaining time.

10:30:03 And it seems like they are spied on, because you got cameras

10:30:06 out there.

10:30:09 So the cameras are there, you don't advertise it.

10:30:13 Do those people who pay a fee to rent those shelters, and go

10:30:19 into a public park, do they have a right to know that they

10:30:22 are being spied on?

10:30:23 >> That would be more of a legal question, you know.

10:30:26 But I believe not.

10:30:27 I believe a public area and a public park.

10:30:30 We don't put cameras in the shelters.

10:30:32 We don't put covert cameras in the shelters.

10:30:36 More in the public areas like the areas where people are

10:30:38 going to gather.

10:30:39 And that's usually where we have problems with sometimes

10:30:43 some youth will go in there and, you know, if there's a

10:30:47 problem, you know, we have had stabbings and shootings and

10:30:50 things like that.

10:30:51 And that's kind of what we are focused on.

10:30:53 It's for the people that are actually trying to have fun in

10:30:55 the park, able to have that fun and not have been to worry

10:30:58 about other people that don't have those same intentions

10:31:03 going in there and basically changing their lives by

10:31:06 committing violence.

10:31:07 >> Let me ask you, are those permanent cameras?

10:31:09 >> No, no.

10:31:10 >> Portables?

10:31:11 >> Yes.

10:31:12 >> And they are done mostly during the summer?

10:31:14 >> It's a summer initiative.

10:31:15 We ask our commanders in each district to come up with the

10:31:18 areas that are hot spots that we know from history had

10:31:21 problems and come up with plans and ways that we can help

10:31:23 reduce the crime and reduce the problems.

10:31:26 And that's what the focus is on.

10:31:28 And that's why we put them where we do.

10:31:30 >>FRANK REDDICK: And I appreciate -- and I hope legal can

10:31:35 answer that question, someone from legal can respond to that

10:31:40 question.

10:31:41 But finally, I appreciate that you have the mobile cameras

10:31:49 and that had you purchase more to try to get to the bottom

10:31:54 of all this illegal dumping going on.

10:31:56 Do you feel with dim cameras that you have made a dent into

10:32:02 reducing the amount of illegal dumping?

10:32:04 >> I do.

10:32:05 I think they have been very effective.

10:32:08 Because not only -- and I don't want to give away too much

10:32:10 of our secrets here.

10:32:12 But they let us know real quick if somebody is doing it and

10:32:15 we are able to deploy police officers, where before usually

10:32:18 it's a matter of going after the fact and cleaning up the

10:32:21 mess.

10:32:21 We are actually able to catch them making the mess and

10:32:24 arresting them for it.

10:32:25 So I think they are having an impact.

10:32:26 >>FRANK REDDICK: Thank you.

10:32:29 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Mr. Cohen?

10:32:31 Oh, I'm sorry.

10:32:31 >>REBECCA KERT: Legal department.

10:32:35 As to the specific question about where and when you do not

10:32:40 have a specific entitlement to expect privacy, in each

10:32:44 situation it's very fact specific but the bottom line is if

10:32:48 you are out in the public where others can see you and hear

10:32:51 you, the courts have determined up do not have a right to

10:32:54 privacy in that, an expectation of privilege system that

10:32:58 other people will not be able to hear what you are saying if

10:33:00 you are out in the open, say a public shelter where anyone

10:33:02 five feet away can hear it.

10:33:04 The courts have determined, for example, back in the day

10:33:07 when they used to have pay phones that actually had doors

10:33:10 that closed, you went inside and closed the door.

10:33:13 Even though you were out in public, you had an expectation

10:33:16 that the conversation that you were having would not be

10:33:21 heard. In Florida there are certain rules about when you

10:33:23 cannot do audio taping of people and the courts held that

10:33:27 even if you are in your office out don't have much

10:33:30 expectation of privacy there.

10:33:31 So it's that specific.

10:33:32 But for the exact question that you asked, if you are out in

10:33:35 a public park where anyone can be walking by, an undercover

10:33:42 officer, me, you, then you should have an expectation that

10:33:44 what you are saying no one else is going to hear it or that

10:33:47 no one else is going to see or take a picture of what you

10:33:50 are doing.

10:33:51 From a legal standpoint.

10:33:53 and I realize there are policy implications that you may or

10:33:57 may not agree within what the courts say but.

10:34:00 >>FRANK REDDICK: You have an expectation of knowing that

10:34:03 there's a camera on a pole somewhere watching you?

10:34:06 >>REBECCA KERT: When people are out in the public, people

10:34:09 should not be surprised if there's a camera, be it a

10:34:11 government camera or private camera or someone with a cell

10:34:14 phone.

10:34:16 That's the reality of the world today.

10:34:17 People need to understand that there are cameras everywhere.

10:34:20 >> So we have a police state in the park?

10:34:22 >> I am not going to agree with your characterization of

10:34:25 that on any level.

10:34:26 I am just saying that if you are out there, everyone has got

10:34:30 cameras these days, and you should not be surprised if

10:34:33 someone is taking your picture when you are out in public.

10:34:35 >>FRANK REDDICK: Thank you.

10:34:38 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Mr. Cohen?

10:34:39 >>HARRY COHEN: I do want to thank you for meeting with all

10:34:41 of us individually, and for giving each of us the

10:34:44 opportunity when we wanted to come over and actually view

10:34:47 the cameras and the way in which they are operated.

10:34:53 And I think where are because both Councilman Reddick and

10:34:59 Mulhern asked specific questions I have very few.

10:35:03 But I want to follow up on one of the things that

10:35:06 Councilwoman Mulhern was asking about public records

10:35:09 request.

10:35:09 Do you keep a record of the number of public records

10:35:11 requests that are made for this type of footage?

10:35:14 >> Our legal office does.

10:35:15 They keep records of everything that is requested.

10:35:18 >>HARRY COHEN: My understanding is that under the 119 law,

10:35:23 you can't compel someone to give a reason why they are

10:35:27 asking for something, just like you can't force them to give

10:35:30 you their name.

10:35:31 But I think that the concern that I have heard expressed is

10:35:36 that there are different purposes, like people would ask for

10:35:39 this type of footage.

10:35:40 Certainly, in the contexts of a civil court action, or

10:35:44 perhaps a traffic accident, or some sort of insurance claim,

10:35:49 this information might have a very legitimate purpose that

10:35:53 could shed light on the fact of a given situation.

10:35:59 There has been some suggestion that people might have a

10:36:04 sinister purpose for asking for this information.

10:36:06 And it seems to me if we know the actual number of requests,

10:36:10 we might not be able to boil it down entirely and establish

10:36:14 exactly what the reasons were, but by knowing the numbers

10:36:17 and getting some idea that we might be able to get a sense

10:36:21 of the reasons that people are asking for this information.

10:36:24 So I think it would be helpful to know that.

10:36:32 It was mentioned about the cameras, the movable cameras

10:36:35 being marked and used for deterrent purposes.

10:36:40 And I was wondering, because you gave us a presentation

10:36:42 talking about the number, some certain individual instances

10:36:46 of crime that appeared to have been directly solved using

10:36:51 the cameras.

10:36:52 It sort of begs the question, though, if there's a deterrent

10:36:55 effect to the overall placing of the cameras, it's hard to

10:36:59 quantify crimes that may have been deterred or, you know,

10:37:05 whether or not an area may have become marginally safer

10:37:09 because of the people's knowledge that there's extra

10:37:12 surveillance.

10:37:12 And it's not of just public surveillance, it's all the ATM

10:37:16 cameras and bank cameras and private cameras that are also

10:37:19 around, and photographing what's out there on the sidewalks.

10:37:25 So it may be difficult for us to totally quantify some of

10:37:29 those things.

10:37:30 And then finally, you know, I do think that when we have

10:37:34 this discussion, it's incumbent upon to us look to other

10:37:41 jurisdictions where cameras have been used, and have played

10:37:45 an instrumental role in solving a crime.

10:37:48 And it's my recollection that the incidence that occurred

10:37:52 this year at the Boston marathon, about that the law

10:37:56 enforcement effort to ultimately apprehended the people that

10:37:59 were responsible for that, is directly related to the

10:38:03 positioning and use of cameras at the event.

10:38:06 And if that's the case, and if there are other instances

10:38:09 like that, that have occurred in the country, I think it's

10:38:13 important that those be part of the analysis as well,

10:38:17 because certainly that's one of the contemplated uses for

10:38:20 this type of device.

10:38:22 >> We'll try to gather as much specifics, but you are

10:38:25 absolutely right, with the Boston bombing, they were pretty

10:38:29 much all cameras, that's how they identified them, were able

10:38:34 to put pictures up, but we put them out on the media people

10:38:38 committing crimes, and we are getting those from cameras.

10:38:40 They might not all be police cameras.

10:38:42 They might be private cameras.

10:38:43 But that's ultimately camera where we are getting that

10:38:47 picture to put there.

10:38:50 And then I wanted to clarify.

10:38:52 When we ask for a reason, they don't have to give us a

10:38:54 reason.

10:38:54 The only reason we ask for a reason, it helps that needle in

10:38:58 the haystack.

10:39:00 It helps us get what we are looking for.

10:39:02 But if they say we want from 5:00 to 5:10 in this

10:39:05 intersection, that's fine.

10:39:06 But if they tell us we are looking at a traffic crash, we

10:39:10 might have an angle from another camera that might give them

10:39:13 what they are looking for.

10:39:15 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Mr. Suarez and Ms. Mulhern.

10:39:17 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Thank you for the presentation.

10:39:20 I know of that we as a council always keep trying to weigh

10:39:24 those public policy concerns with public safety concerns.

10:39:28 And sometimes it's not an easy balance for us.

10:39:33 I think Ms. Kert made a very good point in terms of the

10:39:36 public doctrine when it comes to your right to be in private

10:39:42 in a public space.

10:39:45 There's very little that you can look at as private people

10:39:49 out there.

10:39:49 Having said that, I think that one of my main concerns has

10:39:53 always been about the process that we have with our own

10:39:55 police officers that have access to this information on a

10:40:00 realtime basis, even though it's not live monitoring, there

10:40:03 is a way for them to access fairly quickly.

10:40:06 Some of the things that you mention concerning

10:40:08 individualized passwords and access.

10:40:14 If you have already done this, have you done any kind of

10:40:17 audit as to who has access to this information since we

10:40:22 began?

10:40:23 >> Yes, I have personally.

10:40:26 I asked to see who has access to the RNC, and I went through

10:40:30 that, and then we have gone periodically, and I have asked

10:40:33 for who has access now, and the reasoning.

10:40:36 And the reason I want to personally use it, the system is

10:40:43 pretty good about keeping track so we are able to see

10:40:47 everything we are doing is on the way the policy is written.

10:40:50 >>MIKE SUAREZ: And for me it's a systemic way of making

10:40:54 sure that those tools that are using are not abused because

10:40:57 of any specific individual problems that you might have with

10:41:02 a specific officer or specific team of officers.

10:41:07 As we have seen, there are times when police officers go

10:41:09 outside of the standard operating procedure.

10:41:12 And I know that for the most part our police officers are

10:41:16 following what needs to be done both in terms of our

10:41:19 internal guidelines, and the legal guidelines that are set

10:41:22 forth.

10:41:23 But we as a council have to always make sure that we are

10:41:26 being diligent with you all.

10:41:28 And I think that what may help alleviate some of the

10:41:33 questions that not only that we have here, but we have had

10:41:35 in the past, is to provide us with information concerning

10:41:38 the upcoming renewal that will happen.

10:41:42 I know that you are looking at ways to reduce that cost so

10:41:45 we are not going to have as big of a cost as we did before.

10:41:48 But secondly, that we need to make sure that that process is

10:41:55 pretty sole I had that it's being followed and we would like

10:41:58 to see a result of that.

10:42:00 And I think for us it is always about, are we getting

10:42:02 anything out of the use of these cameras in terms of crime

10:42:06 reduction?

10:42:07 It is a nebulous matrix.

10:42:11 You can't always say this camera helps solve these crimes,

10:42:16 because there are so many other aspects to it.

10:42:19 But there are always those incidents, the one that you

10:42:23 started your presentation with, which is an absolute direct

10:42:27 relation to it.

10:42:28 And secondly, I think Mr. Cohen said it perfectly, which is

10:42:34 such a heinous crime as what happened in Boston, without

10:42:37 those cameras that were available -- and not all of them --

10:42:41 if I am not mistaken not all of them were public cameras.

10:42:45 I think some of them were private cameras because there were

10:42:48 some bank-related properties, other things -- that puzzle

10:42:54 that we have to solve every time there is a major crime or

10:42:58 even a minor crime, that each piece leads to something else.

10:43:01 Whether it's canvassing the neighborhood and being able to

10:43:07 get that one good witness, or having that one good camera

10:43:09 angle that then leads to another witness or another fact, I

10:43:15 think it's important for us to understand.

10:43:16 And I think that, you know, I like what you have put

10:43:20 together here.

10:43:20 And I would like to have more information, so when it comes

10:43:23 up for renewal we are prepared to answer a lot of the other

10:43:26 questions.

10:43:27 >> I'll do that for you.

10:43:30 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Round 2.

10:43:31 Mrs. Mulhern.

10:43:32 >>MARY MULHERN: I just wanted to bring up a question that

10:43:35 was an example because I don't feel comfortable talking

10:43:38 about that, the Boston example, so if we are going to use

10:43:44 that as a justification for this, I think we need to know

10:43:48 the specifics of what cameras actually gave them the

10:43:52 evidence to find those.

10:43:55 >> The case is still ongoing.

10:43:57 It's going to be up to the FBI to allow us to have it.

10:43:59 >>MARY MULHERN: I don't feel comfortable talking about that

10:44:02 and I think we need to just look at -- we have had over a

10:44:06 year by the time it comes up for renewal of experience with

10:44:10 our cameras and see if we can show that they have been

10:44:13 effective.

10:44:13 I would rather council just look at that.

10:44:17 It is really difficult to figure out, since we are under

10:44:23 watch from ourselves and privately and publicly, but we are

10:44:27 the public proponent of these cameras.

10:44:30 So I think we need to remember that it is our decision about

10:44:33 that.

10:44:35 That additional eye -- those additional eyes that are on us,

10:44:40 and the public, it's really just amazing.

10:44:45 I think about my son, who is 13, the fact that his growing

10:44:51 up now are actually born into -- have been born into

10:44:56 having -- but it doesn't mean that we need to contribute to

10:45:05 that even more.

10:45:06 I think we still need to think about what we are adding to

10:45:09 that and really justify it.

10:45:11 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Captain, thank you very much.

10:45:12 I really appreciate the work that you and the Tampa Police

10:45:15 Department are doing.

10:45:16 And I think it's an issue to be discussed and voted on at

10:45:21 future council meetings.

10:45:22 But I appreciate the time that you have taken to meet with

10:45:24 all the council members.

10:45:26 It was very informative.

10:45:28 I can assure you that one issue that we had downtown was a

10:45:32 result of an arrest by cameras.

10:45:34 There's no doubt in my mind.

10:45:36 And thank you for coming here.

10:45:37 Thank you for doing that.

10:45:39 And we really appreciate your work at the Tampa Police

10:45:43 Department.

10:45:44 Thank you very much.

10:45:44 >> Thank you, sir.

10:45:48 We go to item number 5.

10:45:58 I have here at the end of each workshop.

10:46:04 I'm interpreting that to mean at the end of all the

10:46:06 workshops, not at the end of every one.

10:46:10 Yes, sir?

10:46:14 >>DENNIS FERNANDEZ: Historic preservation manager here on

10:46:15 item number 5.

10:46:16 We were here in April and provided a thorough overview.

10:46:20 At that time, council had requested some back-up information

10:46:24 in the form of an executive summary, and a color coded text

10:46:29 reversion which has been provided.

10:46:32 I'm happy to go through the highlights at the revision to

10:46:36 the Barrio Latino commission ordinance if you like, or

10:46:40 answer any questions.

10:46:42 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Let's start with the questions.

10:46:43 Any questions at this point?

10:46:50 Continue with whatever you like to be say.

10:46:53 >>DENNIS FERNANDEZ: We have also outreached with the Ybor

10:46:55 City development organization, AI eh, and Tampa

10:47:00 Preservation, Inc., which was at the request of council and

10:47:04 would request your support on moving this forward to the

10:47:06 Planning Commission so it can be scheduled for public

10:47:10 hearing.

10:47:14 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you very much.

10:47:19 Council, this is just receiving a summary of what happened.

10:47:23 When it gets here, we'll certainly do what we have to do.

10:47:26 Thank you very much.

10:47:27 We go to item number 6.

10:47:30 The vendor ordinance.

10:47:38 Ms. Coyle? Maybe we have worn them out.

10:47:46 I didn't have a camera on it.

10:47:48 >>CATHERINE COYLE: I'm sorry.

10:47:56 Planning and development.

10:47:57 What Marty is handing out is a copy of the actual code

10:48:01 today, so the special use criteria for vendors.

10:48:04 That was one part of the motion that I provide you with the

10:48:06 current rules.

10:48:07 You can read them or not.

10:48:10 They are pretty standard.

10:48:13 What we wanted to go through really quickly -- and I will

10:48:16 give a brief overview, and basically any questions that

10:48:20 huff, Ernie and I are hear to discuss any options or answers

10:48:29 to questions that you may ask.

10:48:33 Specifically, chair Miranda, with some of the vendors, and I

10:48:36 hate to use the word vendor.

10:48:38 It's businesses that heir set up without permits that

10:48:43 wouldn't meet the criteria of a vendor.

10:48:45 And I want to keep the terms vendor as someone that actually

10:48:49 is operating with a permit.

10:48:51 And legally.

10:48:55 Set up without permits, and we did see some of those

10:48:59 pictures, traffic trailers, the every growing vegetable

10:49:03 stands and all types of stuff and fencing that have taken

10:49:07 over properties.

10:49:08 Then there's a second one, businesses that operate with

10:49:11 permits, vendors, that may on occasion go outside the rules.

10:49:15 Maybe they expand a little take big, they stay open a little

10:49:18 late or open a little early.

10:49:22 These are some of the issues, and a lot of them are actually

10:49:27 in district 6 in the West Tampa area.

10:49:30 And there are a lot, Armenia, Howard, some of those are

10:49:34 areas.

10:49:35 And looking at what we can do to actually deal with them.

10:49:38 As a vendor today in the code, what you have is the special

10:49:42 using criteria, land use permit.

10:49:46 So the issue with those is that you meet the criteria, and

10:49:50 the enforcement side runs with the land.

10:49:53 It's typically to the property owner, through the standard

10:49:57 code enforcement process, through the magistrate.

10:49:59 We have also instituted the ability to issue a civil

10:50:02 citation as well to the vendor on the property if need be.

10:50:05 What we have found, though, a lot of the photos that we have

10:50:08 seen in the past, don't actually have vendor permits, they

10:50:14 are operating illegally, an illegal business.

10:50:16 On the flip side, looking at the box, an operating permit

10:50:20 which is under chapter 6, as opposed to a land-based permit,

10:50:24 we are looking at an actual permit for the business to

10:50:26 operate.

10:50:28 Which in a lot of ways is a better route because that's

10:50:31 actually what we are dealing with, and enforcement, being

10:50:34 able to deal directly with our operator.

10:50:38 When we opened up chapter 6 -- and we did talk about this

10:50:41 the last time, and Ernie spent a lot of time going through

10:50:45 the list of regulated businesses the way that chapter 6 is

10:50:49 set up, the framework of chapter 6, and it was quickly

10:50:53 discovered -- and chapter 6 is kind of a mess, basically --

10:50:56 in 1989 the city adopted the list of regulated businesses

10:51:00 and secondhand goods, news and arcades, flea markets, blood

10:51:07 donor centers, adult uses and so on.

10:51:10 So every year, since '89, they come to the city, and they

10:51:14 apply for business operating permit.

10:51:16 That application is around the appropriate agencies, and not

10:51:20 with the criteria. Zoning always gets a copy of them to

10:51:23 make sure that that use is allowed on the property.

10:51:26 We have gone off for a zoning signature, and it goes back.

10:51:29 I will personally -- I have to check to make sure there's no

10:51:34 proven adult use on the site. If there is I find it goes

10:51:37 back or I deny it if there isn't one.

10:51:42 Now subsequent years -- and this is where it's gotten

10:51:48 interesting over the years -- through divot rations of

10:51:52 council and different issues that were raised, new uses to

10:51:55 be regulated were added into chapter 6.

10:51:58 But instead of being integrated in the list, they were

10:52:01 passed on but we added things like bath house, offpremises

10:52:11 canvassing in Ybor, vehicles on private property, shopping

10:52:14 carts, and then what Ernie has done is research rentals in

10:52:24 chapter 14.

10:52:25 So chapter 14 is offenses.

10:52:27 So if they are legal not to have a business operating

10:52:29 permit.

10:52:30 Essentially that's what it says.

10:52:31 But it's not actually in the business operating.

10:52:36 You have to go to a different chapter to find out about

10:52:39 different operating permit.

10:52:40 So there's some definite clean-up to do across chapters.

10:52:44 But in chapter 6 itself, fixing that framework, and

10:52:48 consolidating, streamlining processes.

10:52:51 So it's one way in and one way out.

10:52:58 Much like we use for the DRCs, rezoning, one avenue in,

10:53:04 and whoever needs to review it, those agencies come and say

10:53:08 "yes" or "no," and then a decision is made.

10:53:11 The way it's set up now is many different avenues to follow.

10:53:15 We like to get it into one streamline path.

10:53:19 The second peace of this that we are going to recommend,

10:53:23 moving the vendors from a special use permit to operating

10:53:26 operate is also the type of vendors, making it much more

10:53:31 straightforward.

10:53:34 There's Ybor City special event vendor.

10:53:37 There's a regular special event vendor.

10:53:39 There's a sports and entertainment vendor which is like a

10:53:42 special event vendor except only special areas around the

10:53:45 stadium, the forum, and the convention center.

10:53:48 There's an annual vendor and there's temporary vendor.

10:53:51 Temporary is what is seasonal for Christmas trees and

10:53:55 pumpkins and so on.

10:53:56 What we are looking at is really streamlining those and

10:53:59 consolidating them into three basic types -- the annual,

10:54:03 seasonal, and events.

10:54:05 The event vendors are tied top a city sanctioned event.

10:54:10 So they are someone that there's already a permit been

10:54:13 approved by council or the special events office.

10:54:17 And then you or someone is tagged on as a vendor.

10:54:25 In the long run it will help simplify that to call it what

10:54:29 it is.

10:54:31 Now, the good thing -- and for better enforcement -- the

10:54:36 good thing is that under the box scenario, is if you are a

10:54:41 person that's operating a business on a property, under this

10:54:45 rule, to move to the chapter 6, you are operating an illegal

10:54:51 business in the city if you don't have a business operating

10:54:53 permit.

10:54:53 So what we can do at this that point is right away issue a

10:54:57 notice to appear and that goes to the municipal ordinance

10:54:59 court that's been formed.

10:55:01 So you get your hearing because you are operating an illegal

10:55:11 business in the city.

10:55:13 As opposed to the normal processes of special use permit

10:55:16 where you just might have to wind up in that long process

10:55:21 through code enforcement, magistrate.

10:55:24 The second one is if you are operating a business with a

10:55:28 business operating permit, but you are doing something

10:55:30 outside of the conditions without permit, and we see that

10:55:34 you are, and we have noticed that you are operating out side

10:55:37 of those, what we can do at that point, because it's a

10:55:40 permit that can be suspended or revoked, we are looking at

10:55:46 ringing those through the hearing process directly to the

10:55:48 magistrate, for revocation of the permits.

10:55:51 Once that's revoked, we would recommend at that point that

10:55:54 the rules say that you could not reapply for a permit if it

10:55:57 is revoked for 12 months.

10:55:59 Minimum of 12 months.

10:56:01 Or the next annual cycle, whichever is more.

10:56:05 And that would be a deterrent to come back and reap Pete

10:56:09 those offenses.

10:56:13 With that, it looks like we talked about the time frames for

10:56:17 being able to bring the code changes back to council.

10:56:20 And we have some nuance.

10:56:23 That we have to massage and work through with police and

10:56:26 code enforce: But we an tips interest going in the January

10:56:29 cycle because it would be amendments to chapter 6, 14 and

10:56:32 27.

10:56:32 And then we should be able to bring something back in March

10:56:36 for your approval.

10:56:38 And with of that, I will leave it open for any questions or

10:56:43 comments.

10:56:45 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Let me ask.

10:56:47 I asked my aide to bring some photos here because what's

10:56:51 happening in a lot of areas of the city, not all, but a lot

10:56:53 of areas, we have the right place to help somebody as a

10:56:57 vendor.

10:56:58 But number one shows you what I thought would be a typical

10:57:01 vendor on the way we wrote the ordinance.

10:57:04 Let me show you what happens.

10:57:06 This vendor, let me show you what happens.

10:57:08 Number two, there's your vendor in another location.

10:57:11 That's on king and Armenia and these photographs were taken

10:57:15 by Mary and myself.

10:57:17 Number three, same location, and you can see what happens

10:57:20 when you live right next to these operations, what it

10:57:23 causes, is the health, safety and welfare of what they bring

10:57:28 to roads and everything else.

10:57:29 And here is how they are.

10:57:31 I don't know if these had a permit, that's on Braddock.

10:57:36 That is Braddock and Armenia.

10:57:38 Started out as a real small tent and started growing.

10:57:41 And that's a semi that they brought in a couple of days

10:57:44 later.

10:57:45 It's a grocery store on wheels.

10:57:48 That's the next one.

10:57:49 Now they start a picnic area with flags and everything else.

10:57:52 But they keep going on these things.

10:57:54 And you start to get an idea of what happens.

10:57:58 Code enforcement has done everything they can are in their

10:58:00 power.

10:58:01 They have done a good job.

10:58:02 That's number 9.

10:58:04 That one is on Lois, and Hillsborough Avenue behind the

10:58:09 store there, the drugstore.

10:58:11 Even though it's not completely gone, there's no products

10:58:15 being sold, and it's empty shell.

10:58:18 So, I mean, they have done what they can within the

10:58:22 operational system that they have.

10:58:24 But we have a system that's failed.

10:58:26 It's failed for some time.

10:58:27 And we blame everyone.

10:58:30 We should blame the system and then look at the individuals

10:58:33 under that system.

10:58:34 And that's how it is.

10:58:35 And what we have here is a calamity of errors not caused by

10:58:40 anyone directly but by the system in which we have to work.

10:58:44 And I believe that the work of Ernie and Cathy and Jake Roe

10:58:52 they are not my neighbors, just individuals that work hard

10:58:55 for the city -- have had a meeting with the administration

10:58:59 and others in the city that has done this type of work to

10:59:01 change it from what where we are at but we can't produce

10:59:05 what the public really needs to have done and put it in

10:59:07 another chapter when you can have activity directly -- you

10:59:11 don't have to wait 30 days in fixing these.

10:59:15 However, let me also warn when these things go to court, we

10:59:19 don't manage their calendars.

10:59:21 There's another system there.

10:59:22 And you still may have to wait 30 or 60 days.

10:59:25 And the system they have to they've to be improved again.

10:59:28 I can tell you.

10:59:30 My other work that I do doesn't work that way.

10:59:32 When you give a notice, you appeal within five days and the

10:59:35 action is taken immediately.

10:59:36 But I don't run the city.

10:59:39 I can't do what I do in another job because it's different,

10:59:43 altogether different.

10:59:44 I understand that.

10:59:45 But I want to thank the individuals that heir working at

10:59:49 this height, and the yearly permits, I don't know if these

10:59:56 ones that were brought up today, by the way these were taken

11:00:01 with a camera, not a police camera, my camera, but what I am

11:00:05 saying is I don't know Tampa direction of the vendors for a

11:00:09 year, were these part of the yearly vendors?

11:00:15 I don't not of if they were or not.

11:00:17 But a yearly vendor to me is not the right way top go any

11:00:21 longer.

11:00:22 I have never opposed it, but I oppose it now, because it

11:00:26 just creates a hardship on the neighborhood, creates a

11:00:29 hardship on the businesses that are legitimately there in

11:00:34 the building, paying their taxes, paying not only their

11:00:37 taxes but their employment fees, to the government, the

11:00:40 feds, and who knows what the people pay?

11:00:44 I would venture to say that sales tax is something that is

11:00:48 not collected too often, or paid too often.

11:00:51 Maybe I'm wrong.

11:00:52 But it's certainly evident by most everybody that things

11:01:00 along the line are not done in accordance with the rules and

11:01:03 regulations of that country.

11:01:05 But I'm not accusing anyone.

11:01:06 I'm just saying that there's a possibility that these things

11:01:09 do happen.

11:01:09 But go on, Ms. Coyle.

11:01:11 >>CATHERINE COYLE: Just to add on the annual vendors, the

11:01:14 reason we retained this was just top try to PARE down the

11:01:22 five, if you want to have an annual, could you simply have

11:01:24 one that's just an event base where they specify specific

11:01:29 dates to the Bucs season or special events, an event, and

11:01:34 they would have to come in and get the new operating permit

11:01:37 for each event and just have the seasonal ones that cover

11:01:40 just a certain time frame for those particular times during

11:01:43 the year.

11:01:44 You don't have to keep the annual.

11:01:47 There's just one thatch we pulled over as an option.

11:01:49 When we first visit vendor regulations many years ago that

11:01:54 was part of that debate, was looking at allowing someone to

11:01:57 do an annual, it's a lower start-up cost for them to set up

11:02:01 something like this.

11:02:02 It could be a side business that they do every weekend.

11:02:05 It could be the guy with much the smoker behind his truck

11:02:08 that pulls into a gas station and works on weekends.

11:02:11 But that is purely a policy decision bus -- because county

11:02:15 get a little out of hand.

11:02:16 And to clarify the pictures you showed, it's my

11:02:19 understanding that those did not have vendor permits.

11:02:22 They just set up shop.

11:02:23 And that's a scenario that if you are operating a business

11:02:26 illegally we'll issue the notices here, send you to court.

11:02:30 And in our conversation yesterday with the chair, Ernie and

11:02:32 myself, we did think about if you are on the property, and

11:02:37 sales and service activities are a permitted use because

11:02:39 it's commercial property, but you are obligated to have a

11:02:42 business operating permit, you are operating illegally in

11:02:45 the city, we are going to deal with you the operator and

11:02:48 send you to court, yes, we are going to deal with you, and

11:02:53 we are going to send you to court, coupled with that, it

11:02:57 would probably behoove us to notify the property owner a as

11:03:00 well that this illegal activity has happened on your

11:03:03 property, and that given the option, especially trying to

11:03:07 get the person off the property, you certainly have the

11:03:10 option to allow us to issue the trespass to TPD.

11:03:13 We may want to issue the notice to appear to the property

11:03:17 owner for allowing that illegal activity.

11:03:19 There's many different avenues we are going to discuss with

11:03:21 TPD, and the rest of legal counsel to make sure we are

11:03:24 following the right path.

11:03:26 But even with the business being found illegal or in

11:03:29 violation, we want to make sure we go back to the property

11:03:32 owner to let them know and give them the option, we can rid

11:03:35 the property of that illegal property sooner than later so

11:03:40 they can't keep operating until their day in court.

11:03:42 That's really the crux of what he was trying to get to

11:03:47 yesterday.

11:03:47 >>MIKE SUAREZ: A scenario that came to my head, if the land

11:03:51 owner does not have a business operating permit, they can't

11:03:59 do anything either on that parcel of land until -- correct?

11:04:03 >>CATHERINE COYLE: If they want to do that type of

11:04:05 nonpermitted sales of stuff, yes, they to have one as well.

11:04:11 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Here is the question.

11:04:12 Mr. Mueller, maybe you can add to this question.

11:04:16 Do we in the course -- well, you are slow today, Ernie.

11:04:20 Come on.

11:04:21 Are you okay?

11:04:24 We need more caffeine out there for you, I think, my friend.

11:04:27 In terms of -- let's say a situation that is presented sort

11:04:37 of what Ms. Coyle was talking about, which is we have got a

11:04:40 land owner that, you know, and some of the pictures that Mr.

11:04:43 Miranda had showed us, which is a land owner doesn't know or

11:04:48 doesn't care that someone set up shop over there, that

11:04:50 person doesn't have a business operator's permit, if we

11:04:58 discover based on that picture, scenario, frights and

11:05:02 vegetables being sold, there's other regulators that deal

11:05:04 with those types of situations, sales tax, other things, can

11:05:11 they sell a product that just fell off the truck, so to

11:05:16 speak?

11:05:17 I mean, do we ever coordinate with other governmental

11:05:22 entities that have purview over other pieces of that

11:05:27 business as an illegal entity, do we ever contact them and

11:05:30 go from there?

11:05:32 >>ERNEST MUELLER: I'm not sure to what extent code

11:05:36 enforcement is out there, they might see something, a fruit

11:05:40 stand or whatever else and they might check with the state

11:05:42 Department of Health.

11:05:43 I don't know if they can speak to that H.we can certainly

11:05:49 try and work on those types of relationships if we are not

11:05:53 there.

11:05:53 I am know it aware if they are or are not.

11:05:55 >>MIKE SUAREZ: The only reason I say that is because Mr.

11:05:58 Miranda brought up a very good point, which is the process

11:06:01 time frame that we have.

11:06:03 There may be other state laws that they are violating that

11:06:06 might put them into a quicker situation, which they have to

11:06:11 either be paying into state, or something else that will

11:06:16 cause them to close up shop, because they are doing it

11:06:19 illegally.

11:06:20 And, again, there's nothing against us going after and doing

11:06:24 what we need to do.

11:06:25 But if we have other agencies involved whether it's county

11:06:27 or state that have some other purview over a type of

11:06:32 activity that's going on, then we can involve them.

11:06:35 And I don't know how we do that.

11:06:38 Maybe yourself can look at some of the legal aspects, and

11:06:41 then translate that to Mr. Slater's team and say, look, you

11:06:45 know, maybe we ought to create a checklist that says, hey,

11:06:48 this is what's going on here, we are putting them on notice,

11:06:51 they don't have a business operating permit, we are going to

11:06:53 put them in our process, but this is what they were selling.

11:06:57 And that maybe there's a state component to it that we can

11:07:00 involve them to have them come down on this particular bad

11:07:06 vendor or bad operator.

11:07:09 That's all I have, chair.

11:07:13 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Any other council members?

11:07:14 Cathy, I can only speak for myself.

11:07:17 You know, at the same time that I am for vendors, I'm

11:07:22 against annual vendors.

11:07:23 At the same time that I'm against annual vendors, I can

11:07:26 understand at the time of application someone who is going

11:07:29 to be at a certain location for a long period of time, I

11:07:32 don't want that individual coming in every week or every day

11:07:35 asking for something.

11:07:37 At the time of permitting, that individual giving them the

11:07:41 right to be there through the application, I assume received

11:07:45 by the city, that they have a specific size, location and

11:07:50 approval built administration.

11:07:51 And what I don't like to see is what I have been looking at,

11:07:54 that most of them, if not all of them, have no right to be

11:08:00 there and we can't even go in because the property laws that

11:08:05 prohibit individuals from -- governments from going into

11:08:08 your land.

11:08:09 And hear again, at the other job that I have, at the time I

11:08:13 sign off, guess what, we have to right to go into your

11:08:18 stall, into your stable and look for whatever I want.

11:08:21 And I think there's laws out there that may parallel the

11:08:24 same rules.

11:08:26 And if you are going to be a vendor, and you are going to be

11:08:28 a yearly annual vendor, assigned location, that can be

11:08:33 measured or whatever from time to time, it's very difficult,

11:08:37 it's very tricky to understand and work with these things.

11:08:40 They seem very simple, but they are not.

11:08:42 Because other people get involved.

11:08:45 And they have rights.

11:08:46 And I don't want to stomp on their rights.

11:08:48 But at the same time, the citizens of the city also have

11:08:51 rights.

11:08:51 And they don't want this kind of stuff next to them.

11:08:53 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Is it possible -- we all see these

11:09:01 vendors around, you know, in our daily travels.

11:09:04 I'm imagining that TPD and code enforcement and every other

11:09:08 solid waste, every other department that has people on the

11:09:14 streets, now, eyes and ears on the street, is there some

11:09:17 kind of flyer or one-page information that we can didn't to

11:09:25 people?

11:09:25 Because some of the folks, you know, may not know how to

11:09:32 enter the process.

11:09:34 You know, where to start.

11:09:36 A lot of people contacting city government or county

11:09:38 government, it's very intimidating.

11:09:42 Every time I try it, who do I call?

11:09:44 And I end up giving them my card.

11:09:47 And they call my office and then the aide will give them the

11:09:50 information.

11:09:51 But if we have something that we can just hand to people

11:09:53 whether it's us or like I said, TPD, code enforcement, solid

11:09:57 waste, whoever comes and says, you know, call business tax,

11:10:01 or this is where you go down to apply, and that way they

11:10:06 have the information?

11:10:07 I mean, woo we do something like that?

11:10:10 It's very informal.

11:10:11 Two so that you can say, here is the information, contact

11:10:15 them.

11:10:18 >>CATHERINE COYLE: We certainly could come up with a quick

11:10:20 flyer for that.

11:10:21 I could say we issue hundreds of permits per year based on

11:10:25 the different types that we have.

11:10:26 Because the rules have been around for many years now.

11:10:28 >>LISA MONTELIONE: People are always going to say, "I don't

11:10:35 know who to call."

11:10:38 >>CATHERINE COYLE: A lot of people come in and they don't

11:10:39 speak English as well.

11:10:44 Just to go back to Mr. Miranda's point to highlight the

11:10:47 annual vendor requirements today, they are only allowed on a

11:10:50 certain list of streets and they are major classified

11:10:52 roadways.

11:10:53 They are not allowed within historic districts.

11:10:56 And they cannot occupy more than two parking spaces or more

11:11:02 than 600 square feet area.

11:11:03 They cannot occupy spaces that are required for the

11:11:06 business.

11:11:06 So diminished parking requirement.

11:11:09 They are only allowed to be open dawn to dusk which we

11:11:13 originally had the same time frame as the temporary vendors

11:11:16 from 7 in the morning till 9:00 at night.

11:11:19 It was a hard number.

11:11:20 Council at the time changed from dawn to dusk.

11:11:23 It changes throughout the year.

11:11:26 An interesting thing to enforce at tames.

11:11:28 They can't install anything on glass containers.

11:11:32 The maximum is 12 square feet.

11:11:34 There are limits on what you can do for an annual vendor.

11:11:37 And that's what I was saying, the ones that I have seen on

11:11:40 these pictures, I did go back and look up at a couple of

11:11:44 intersections and they didn't have permits at all.

11:11:46 Nor would they have qualified for one based on the annual

11:11:49 rules.

11:11:50 So if we do keep an annual permit, or if we go top a shorter

11:11:55 time frame of six months or three months or whatever it is

11:11:58 to try to shove people that they can operate the right way,

11:12:05 I would recommend we do keep the provisions that is only on

11:12:08 the mainly classified streets, that it is limited in size

11:12:12 and character, that it doesn't get out of hand, but it is

11:12:17 very clear, and they do get a permit legally, that once they

11:12:21 expand, we have something to judge by what they have done.

11:12:25 It.

11:12:27 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Any other questions of Ms. Coyle?

11:12:29 So I assume you will be coming back to us?

11:12:35 >>CATHERINE COYLE: We are going to be putting it in the

11:12:36 January cycle, like I said.

11:12:38 We are going to keep moving forward on this.

11:12:40 And hopefully by March have a full draft.

11:12:42 If you would like a staff report at the end of the year we

11:12:44 can come back with it.

11:12:46 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I think when you come back have it all at

11:12:48 one time.

11:12:50 >>CATHERINE COYLE: Once it's off the priority list?

11:12:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: You are coming back on number 7, the

11:12:54 chicken league.

11:12:55 >>CATHERINE COYLE: And I was hoping not to ask to actually

11:13:06 continue this and at the last minute I am still waiting on

11:13:09 two phone calls, one from department of protection and one

11:13:12 from fish and game.

11:13:13 I read through all the statutes, the laws, the general laws

11:13:17 of the State of Florida, and there's some interesting

11:13:19 language out there.

11:13:19 So I need some clarification from those administrators.

11:13:22 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: And what I am receiving is that you feel

11:13:25 uncomfortable at this time.

11:13:27 Give me the time that you need.

11:13:28 >>CATHERINE COYLE: I hate to say 30 days and then for some

11:13:32 reason I need more clarification.

11:13:34 So two months.

11:13:36 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: 60 days.

11:13:36 >> Staff report at 10 a.m. on October 24th.

11:13:45 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Motion by Mr. Cohen.

11:13:46 Second by Mr. Reddick.

11:13:47 Discussion by council members?

11:13:50 60 days.

11:13:50 >>FRANK REDDICK: I have a question.

11:13:54 And that is, could you also consider when you come back to

11:13:59 us where we can make chicken seasonal?

11:14:12 >>CATHERINE COYLE: Chicken Cesar?

11:14:14 I thought you were making a chicken joke.

11:14:17 Chicken seasonal?

11:14:21 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: So six months?

11:14:22 >> I guess I need some clarification on what he means by

11:14:26 seasonal.

11:14:29 Of.

11:14:30 >>FRANK REDDICK: They are outdoors in a coop, right it?

11:14:33 In November, December, we have bad inclement weather in

11:14:37 Florida.

11:14:37 >> What would you like to do with that?

11:14:42 >>FRANK REDDICK: In that time period stay in their

11:14:47 backyards.

11:14:47 >>CATHERINE COYLE: Okay.

11:14:52 I'm sorry.

11:14:54 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: 60 days.

11:14:55 And time and date.

11:14:57 >>HARRY COHEN: October 24th at 10 a.m.

11:15:00 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Made by Mr. Cohen.

11:15:00 Seconded by Mr. Reddick.

11:15:02 All in favor of that motion?

11:15:04 Eyes have it unanimously.

11:15:05 Thank you very much on number 7.

11:15:07 Number 8.

11:15:08 It's discussion of replacing city lights with L.E.D.s.

11:15:20 >>MARY MULHERN: I guess we are going to hear from TECO

11:15:31 first?

11:15:36 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Well, somehow we missed the players.

11:15:41 Ms. Mulhern?

11:15:42 >>MARY MULHERN: While we are waiting, I move to transmit

11:15:47 the number 5 to the Planning Commission.

11:15:49 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I have a motion by Mrs. Mulhern.

11:15:51 Second by Mr. Reddick on number 5 to the Planning

11:15:55 Commission.

11:15:56 All in favor?

11:15:57 Opposed?

11:15:57 The ayes have it unanimously.

11:16:02 >> Good morning.

11:16:09 Jean Duncan, planning transportation.

11:16:11 I am here this morning with several representatives, chief

11:16:16 engineer City of Tampa, Laura Kraut from TECO, who has a

11:16:22 couple of folks with her, and here to share some information

11:16:26 about L.E.D.s lighting that's recently become available to

11:16:31 TECO. And I wanted to start out with the PowerPoint

11:16:39 information that's provided to you all.

11:16:40 We have it all on the PowerPoint.

11:16:42 And you can hear her information and then take your

11:16:48 questions after that point.

11:16:49 I'll let Laura kick it off and we'll go from there.

11:16:54 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you very much.

11:16:54 >> Laura: Thanks for having us in today.

11:17:00 We have been working with staff the last month or so, and

11:17:05 going through on new offerings on L.E.D.s in our lighting,

11:17:11 essentially all our light offerings that you can have any

11:17:14 number of lights, not just L.E.D. lights.

11:17:16 What we did different is we added eight new L.E.D. offerings

11:17:20 that are sort of available as a choice when you are making a

11:17:23 decision about streetlighting.

11:17:26 Can you see that?

11:17:28 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I know you stated your name.

11:17:31 >> Laura Kraut.

11:17:35 In April 2013, we provided for lighting tariff to include

11:17:42 eight new.

11:17:43 Generally if you are not familiar with L.E.D.s, they have

11:17:45 lighting technology.

11:17:46 It has a whiter, brighter light.

11:17:49 In some cases there's energy efficiency and cost savings

11:17:52 associated with using these type of lights.

11:17:54 Not all cases.

11:17:56 They are often more durable.

11:17:58 There's more control of them.

11:18:00 They can come on quickly.

11:18:01 And there's potentially some safety improvements associated

11:18:04 with the quality of the lights.

11:18:05 It can light up an area where a lot of lights that they have

11:18:09 more of a yellow color to them.

11:18:13 This is more of a white light you can seep true colors.

11:18:17 Someone wearing a black jacket versus a dark blue jacket or

11:18:20 brown jacket, you can see we've you can't with another kind

11:18:24 of light.

11:18:25 It's interesting technology.

11:18:26 There's a lot of interest in them.

11:18:29 And what we have been kind of discussing is it's an option,

11:18:32 eights decision point.

11:18:33 So you need to kind of look at the place that had you want

11:18:36 to put the light, the size of the light, the application,

11:18:39 kind of custom tailor it to what you are trying to do and

11:18:42 will make the most sense.

11:18:44 We can move to the next slide.

11:18:46 what we did is we looked at the typical kind of selection of

11:18:58 typical lightings, around the City of Tampa system.

11:19:01 So it's kind of like small, medium and large.

11:19:04 And it looks at one of the smaller lights.

11:19:07 It's a 100 watt light specifically found in residential

11:19:11 communities, smaller residential streets, some commercial

11:19:13 streets, and we show you some pictures of the difference of

11:19:17 what they look like now and what the L.E.D.s look like.

11:19:21 And to explain this, you are lining up the that traditional

11:19:25 lights, L.E.D. lights.

11:19:28 The red portion shows you like if you were just to buy the

11:19:33 light itself, this is how much it costs.

11:19:34 The green is the energy portion.

11:19:36 And that shows you how much energy for the lights and then

11:19:45 you have your blue, the maintenance type costs, to go out

11:19:49 and take care of it.

11:19:51 And you can see between these two, the lights that you have

11:19:57 now in your system are really a cost basis only are more

11:20:02 cost effective.

11:20:03 You can also see, I think it's interesting on this

11:20:06 particular size of light, the energy efficiency savings,

11:20:09 there's some there, but it's not as dramatic as you will see

11:20:13 on the others since the energy, it's pretty energy

11:20:16 efficient.

11:20:17 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

11:20:20 And I have already seen this, but it's rep helpful to see it

11:20:24 again.

11:20:25 And so my question on this particular one -- because this is

11:20:30 what I heard when we met -- was that the residential, the

11:20:34 lower wattage was not as cost effective, but really the

11:20:40 whole cost is in the facilities, which is you see initial

11:20:44 installation.

11:20:45 Is that correct?

11:20:46 >> It's like a fixture itself.

11:20:49 Tampa fixture, the cost of the light.

11:20:51 So you are looking at that, the casing, and that whole

11:20:57 component of the electrical within it, the design within it.

11:21:02 >> And I think I asked you these questions earlier.

11:21:06 But for the public's benefit, the cost of the L.E.D. lights.

11:21:12 This is based on the market cost when?

11:21:19 >> It became final in March.

11:21:20 So I would say it's the market cost within the last -- this

11:21:26 particular light, and it's our particular standard, I would

11:21:29 say in the last six months.

11:21:30 >>MARY MULHERN: So that's the initial cost that is like

11:21:35 three times for the traditional light.

11:21:41 But the energy savings in the end, your energy savings is

11:21:44 going, if you use the L.E.D. as opposed to the --

11:21:49 >> In this one it takes a lot longer.

11:21:52 >>MARY MULHERN: How long?

11:22:01 I guess that was a question I meant to ask for this.

11:22:04 I don't know, maybe staff has numbers on that.

11:22:07 But for the three different categories of lights that we are

11:22:11 talking about, how long it takes to make up the cost

11:22:15 differential in the energy savings?

11:22:19 >> We don't have the answer.

11:22:24 We can get that and get back to you.

11:22:28 But you are looking at 3.13 compared to 2.56.

11:22:34 It's very, very small over time.

11:22:37 And I'll show you these other sizes whereby this changes.

11:22:42 It's pretty situation can't.

11:22:43 But it's a choice.

11:22:44 >>MARY MULHERN: I mean, it all ads up every month.

11:22:48 If we are looking at monthly costs here?

11:22:50 Is that of what we are looking at?

11:22:52 >> Right.

11:22:53 Monthly cost numbers.

11:22:54 >>MARY MULHERN: So it adds up.

11:22:55 >>> It's a fixture charge.

11:23:06 But it's a one-time or ten-year.

11:23:08 That's another thing, that the fixtures may be more costly,

11:23:12 but it lasts longer.

11:23:16 >> That's built in.

11:23:20 >>MARY MULHERN: So you, TECO charges us for the fixtures on

11:23:26 a continual basis?

11:23:28 >> You don't pay for the fixture up front.

11:23:30 This is a lease rate.

11:23:31 So you are paying for a portion of the fixture.

11:23:33 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay, we are leasing --

11:23:37 >> A portion of it every month and it's spaced out on --

11:23:42 >>MARY MULHERN: That's an agreement that huff with the PSC

11:23:45 on the fixture?

11:23:45 >> It's based on the filing when we file the costs, we

11:23:49 provide backup, we file the agreement, it's available for

11:23:56 staff comment, it's available for public comment.

11:23:58 We typically are working with our customers to make sure we

11:24:00 are putting lights in that they are wanting.

11:24:02 And so it goes through their review, and that's how we end

11:24:07 up with the tariff and offer it to you as a choice.

11:24:11 >>MARY MULHERN: So when you say staff, you mean our staff?

11:24:15 >> PSC staff reviews it and public has review and comment

11:24:20 and can intervene if they are not happy with it.

11:24:22 >>MARY MULHERN: This happened back in March.

11:24:24 So we are not -- public input from today won't count for

11:24:31 determining the tariff rate?

11:24:33 >> It's a process.

11:24:37 Like I said we work with our customers and if they have

11:24:40 other things they are looking for we evaluate and try to get

11:24:43 them what they need.

11:24:46 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay.

11:25:04 So that's the 100 watt.

11:25:07 Now we are going to talk about the 250.

11:25:09 These are a little bigger.

11:25:10 These are used in parking lots, neighborhoods, streets,

11:25:14 public facilities, large industries, and you can see they

11:25:19 are starting to become closer in their costs.

11:25:22 You have got your facilities charge, getting a little

11:25:25 closer, you can see the size of light.

11:25:29 So starting to become a little closer.

11:25:34 And then the last one that we are showing you is a

11:25:37 1,000-foot shoe box.

11:25:42 These are find in community streets, large parking lots,

11:25:45 then they have a lot of light, and you can see that you are

11:25:50 really seeing a difference between the lights.

11:25:52 You have got the 1,000 watt shoe box, and you can see the

11:25:58 energy cost at 27, the 23, compared to your LEDs which

11:26:03 cost around $5, $7.

11:26:07 If you are looking at it from a cost savings perspective

11:26:09 specifically, this is a category that would be kind of need

11:26:16 to look at that sooner.

11:26:18 And then the next slide is an inventory of the City of

11:26:24 Tampa's lights.

11:26:25 So what this shows you is the type of light you have on your

11:26:28 system.

11:26:29 And so 71% of your lights are the 100 watt smaller lights,

11:26:36 about 14.4% of the 250 size that mid size, and you have

11:26:42 about 3.6% of really large thousand watt lights.

11:26:50 Any questions on that?

11:26:55 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Any questions at this time by council

11:26:56 members?

11:26:57 Ms. Mulhern, Mr. Cohen.

11:26:58 >>MARY MULHERN: Yeah, I had a quick question.

11:27:01 And I'm not sure if you noticed.

11:27:02 But the Platt Street lights that we are replacing with

11:27:08 L.E.D.s, are they the 1,000 watt ones or mode yum?

11:27:13 >> I think 50.

11:27:15 >>HARRY COHEN: Actually, the Platt Street item that I

11:27:18 wanted to bring up, because it's my understanding -- and by

11:27:22 the way, thank you, Councilwoman Mulhern, for bringing this

11:27:25 up, and thank you very much for you all for meeting with all

11:27:27 of us individually prior to this to give us an understanding

11:27:32 of how this all worked.

11:27:33 One of the things that came up in our meeting that

11:27:35 Councilwoman Mulhern mentioned is that Platt Street is going

11:27:43 to be a place that people will be able to observe these

11:27:45 types of lights installed, and provide some feedback on

11:27:48 waffle they think about them.

11:27:50 And I just wanted to ask you to elaborate a little bit on

11:27:53 what exactly is going to happen on Platt Street.

11:27:55 >> We'll do a team approach here.

11:27:59 Yes, Platt Street was already on our list?

11:28:06 Of problematic corridors in terms of number of nature time

11:28:11 crashes, in terms of the significant number of severe

11:28:14 injuries crashes, and also the significant number of bike

11:28:21 and ped crashes.

11:28:23 Being that it's going to be resurfaced in the very new

11:28:26 future we are going to be putting a bike lane down, the

11:28:29 project extends from Armenia to about Bayshore, and it was

11:28:32 on our top list.

11:28:33 We decided that it would be very beneficial to the city if

11:28:37 part of our decision-making process, there's a myriad of

11:28:40 factors that need to come together to make a choice on some

11:28:44 of these locations, and it would be very beneficial to have

11:28:48 an actual corridor that has this type of lighting so that we

11:28:52 can actually see the differences, the benefits, and so

11:28:55 forth.

11:28:56 And so we worked with TECO. They were very helpful in

11:29:00 working with us on getting this particular roadway

11:29:03 identified through the costing and through the design of it

11:29:08 to have the lighting put in.

11:29:10 I believe November is about the time frame that the ordering

11:29:14 will take place.

11:29:16 Again, we felt that these types of things, demonstration

11:29:21 project or pilot project, helps us in the decision making.

11:29:25 So that's the plan.

11:29:28 And it did have -- us the one of those corridors in terms of

11:29:35 location and traffic and of course all of the parameters

11:29:37 that we need to make our choices.

11:29:39 It did.

11:29:40 Have more of the lighting and that's one of those locations

11:29:47 kind of on the fence, is it cost effective or not are? Is

11:29:50 it energy effective or not? But we thought it was a very

11:29:53 good candidate as a pilot location.

11:29:55 >>HARRY COHEN: And the key is that people will notice the

11:29:58 difference and be able to tell, and it will be really

11:30:03 interesting to get the feedback about what people think

11:30:07 about it.

11:30:08 I would assume that because the light will be so much

11:30:11 clearer and sharper from a safety perspective, I would think

11:30:16 it would be a great improvement.

11:30:18 >> Yes, we are interested in all the feedbacks whether it's

11:30:21 residents or those who use that corridor, as far as that

11:30:24 type of lighting that they are seeing in terms of our law

11:30:27 enforcement, whether they are seeing some benefit was that

11:30:30 type of lighting, and driver data that we get, so again it's

11:30:35 going to be very helpful for us to see how beneficial those

11:30:39 things are, and then that can be another metric that's more

11:30:43 quantitatively put into our decision making as far as our

11:30:47 choices in putting in this type of lighting.

11:30:49 >>FRANK REDDICK: I received this e-mail that I think

11:31:04 someone sent it to me this afternoon.

11:31:06 And when you have a top 10 corridor, and I see where you

11:31:10 have Platt, Bayshore, Armenia, and you have 128.

11:31:18 But I noticed on the other nine did you not include the town

11:31:24 and says it's pending.

11:31:26 Would you explain to me what you mean by the design is

11:31:28 pending and why?

11:31:33 >> JEAN DUNCAN: Yes.

11:31:34 This is a --

11:31:36 >> Yes.

11:31:37 This is a phase program.

11:31:39 We didn't take time for a year-long study to go out and

11:31:42 investigate every issue and every location.

11:31:48 We are taking bites of the apple as we go along.

11:31:51 So where we are with the program which is about six months

11:31:53 along is through our data collection, we have identified a

11:31:58 set of corridors that we know from the data, which is the

11:32:01 crash data, the crime data, the volume, the severity of

11:32:06 those, that these corridors are subject to further

11:32:11 investigation to see if the lighting is part of the problem.

11:32:17 It may be on some of them the lighting design is adequate

11:32:19 and the lighting is not causing the problems.

11:32:22 There's other things causing this problem to be occurring.

11:32:25 So we have a set of those out there that we are looking at,

11:32:31 and Platt was one on the list, and because of the severity

11:32:37 of those parameters, and the resurfacing project that's

11:32:41 coming along, that one was investigated further by TECO as

11:32:44 far as the lighting design, and they determined there was

11:32:47 some lighting upgrades that would bring that lighting up to

11:32:51 a proper standard, then the decision was, okay, since it

11:32:56 does have some need for better lighting, could we do this as

11:33:00 a pilot project to have a visual of what this different type

11:33:05 of lighting can really do, and what it looks like on the

11:33:08 ground?

11:33:09 >>FRANK REDDICK: So based on what you are saying to me, the

11:33:14 other nine areas, the design is pending?

11:33:16 You have not made a determination that lighting is -- more

11:33:21 light is need in these areas?

11:33:24 >> Yes, sir.

11:33:25 And just for the others to know, the information that Mr.

11:33:27 Reddick is referring to is out of our monthly report that we

11:33:30 do.

11:33:31 I believe I have that with me here.

11:33:41 Give me a moment to have see if I have that particular -- I

11:33:46 believe what you were given is from our report.

11:33:49 Yes.

11:33:52 I have got it here.

11:33:53 >>FRANK REDDICK: Okay.

11:33:54 >> On the back of this.

11:34:04 >>FRANK REDDICK: When would a determination be made on

11:34:06 these other sites?

11:34:09 When would a determination be made on the other nine sites

11:34:11 that huff listed?

11:34:13 >> I don't have it a schedule at this moment on when we will

11:34:19 be getting information sent to and information back from

11:34:21 TECO on those other corridors.

11:34:24 It's a work in progress.

11:34:26 So what we are doing is we are putting it on a monthly

11:34:30 report, along with our other capital projects, that piece

11:34:37 that you are seeing -- that's a front and back copy of our

11:34:40 report -- designed to capture a progress on this program.

11:34:42 So I don't have a laid-out schedule like we would typically

11:34:46 have with a roadway project where it has one of those

11:34:50 standard processes that we follow.

11:34:52 So at this point in time, our information is that we have

11:34:56 this set of locations based on the data that we collected.

11:35:00 And now our next step single-family to go through those,

11:35:03 provide more detailed information to TECO, so that they can

11:35:06 review the lighting component.

11:35:10 The lighting illumination engineers that we refer to, and

11:35:13 they will give us feedback on, you know, which of the

11:35:18 corridors do have some lane deficiencies.

11:35:21 I could also tell you that we are doing the same for the

11:35:23 state roads.

11:35:25 We started out with our city streets to look at.

11:35:30 And parallel to this, the state has offered to use a very

11:35:35 new technology, a vehicle that is made available to them

11:35:42 from allows to you collect information on I will elimination

11:35:52 of the corridors.

11:35:55 TECO is going to be providing us feedback on which corridors

11:36:00 have some illumination deficiencies.

11:36:03 We have actually gotten one back.

11:36:05 Coincidentally, Mr. Reddick, at this time Nebraska corridor

11:36:08 in the area of Hillsborough Avenue.

11:36:10 So as we get those feedbacks from the state, we are going to

11:36:14 share those with TECO.

11:36:16 They will look at those illumination efficiencies that the

11:36:21 state is finding through their data collection, and then we

11:36:25 will work with them on coming up with I illumination plan to

11:36:30 augment the state roads as well.

11:36:33 Again, that's when the decision on L.E.D.s, non-L.E.D.

11:36:40 will come's making sense in terms of all those

11:36:43 parameters that I mentioned.

11:36:44 Obviously, this is something we want to do but we want to do

11:36:47 it thoughtfully and strategically so we are getting the best

11:36:54 value for our dollars.

11:36:56 As someone said, if you keep purchasing these high pressure,

11:37:02 if we purchase the L.E.D. lights as Laura has described that

11:37:06 are going to cost us about $107,000 extra a month, if we

11:37:12 change over our whole system, that's not really a good

11:37:15 decision to make either.

11:37:16 So we are trying to balance wanting to go to more efficient

11:37:21 programs with what makes sense in terms of thatch benefit

11:37:28 and the cost benefit and also getting as much lighting

11:37:31 coverage around the city that we would like.

11:37:33 We don't want to be jumping two feet first with this and

11:37:37 then having some of our neighborhoods out there not having

11:37:40 any lighting at all.

11:37:44 So we are being as strategic as we can with going forward

11:37:46 with the locations that we are doing under the regular

11:37:50 lighting as well as the locations of that we want to

11:37:53 transfer over to L.E.D. lighting.

11:37:55 >>FRANK REDDICK: My final question is, when you say 128

11:38:01 representatives what?

11:38:03 >> That's the number of lights on the Platt Street corridor

11:38:06 that will be replaced under that particular project.

11:38:11 Because some of the lights actually are on the side streets

11:38:15 in order to make a proper I will elimination pattern.

11:38:18 So that's why what seems like a large amount.

11:38:22 >>FRANK REDDICK: Well, I expressed my point top you when we

11:38:29 met, and how I felt about this.

11:38:33 And I might just want to say for the record here that I hope

11:38:42 that other communities in the city will be looking at, and I

11:38:56 want to make sure that is on there.

11:38:57 >> I will be happy to share, also, a map that I have that

11:39:01 shows under our existing program the coverage that we are

11:39:06 planning for -- the lighting whether it's -- this is the

11:39:13 location we are looking to add is the light throughout the

11:39:15 City of Tampa.

11:39:16 I will be glad to share this with you all as well.

11:39:29 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Mrs. Mulhern?

11:39:30 >>MARY MULHERN: I want to wait until after everyone else

11:39:34 has spoken.

11:39:34 >> The grid that we are using, those come from the Tampa

11:39:38 Police Department, the high crime grid.

11:39:40 The high crime, the crash data, and input from our CRA

11:39:45 managers and other officials of our three pronged approach

11:39:49 that we are using.

11:39:51 On the front has those locations that we have done or

11:39:56 planning to do, has a little more detail on where those

11:39:59 locations are, what neighborhoods they fall within B.I just

11:40:03 want to say that's really about a year's time out.

11:40:06 You will see some areas that are showing 2017.

11:40:11 We don't have a five-year program where we have identified

11:40:14 every single street, every single neighborhood at this

11:40:17 point.

11:40:18 You know, again we are a work in progress.

11:40:20 So at this point, we have identified within the next number

11:40:25 of months where we plan to be with TECO.

11:40:28 They have actually gotten done pretty quickly so we are

11:40:32 having to see more locations so what we are seeing is 2014

11:40:37 or maybe 2017, more than likely it's going to be done sooner

11:40:41 than that.

11:40:42 But that's a snow shot to share with you to show where that

11:40:47 coverage is going.

11:40:48 Again it's based on data that we can support why we are in

11:40:51 those particular locations.

11:40:55 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Ms. Mulhern?

11:40:56 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

11:40:57 This is kind of getting off track, but I would like to

11:41:00 support Councilman Reddick's request that for the I will Lim

11:41:08 lum nation benefit of the L.E.D. lights that we look at the

11:41:11 neighborhoods that have -- may not have the crash

11:41:16 statistics, but that have the lack of illumination, and we

11:41:22 know that a lot of those in his district.

11:41:26 Sole if we are going to put L.E.D. lights in, we are going

11:41:29 to start to do that, that sound like we are, I don't see why

11:41:33 we shouldn't do it in those neighborhoods.

11:41:35 And what really jumps out at me, Bauer we are starting in

11:41:41 South Tampa on Platt Street.

11:41:42 And when I look at those crash statistics, we have Platt

11:41:45 Street and Cleveland.

11:41:46 So what do we know about those streets?

11:41:49 I haven't really noticed.

11:41:52 I drive them all the time day and night being really dark.

11:41:55 But I do notice that people drive very, very fast on those

11:41:58 streets because they are one-way streets.

11:42:00 And this is totally off topic but it's interesting because

11:42:06 the streetlights may not solve any of the fact that we have

11:42:10 got people using those streets to get as quickly as possible

11:42:14 where they need to go when there are local streets that

11:42:18 are -- the InVision plan has recommended they should be

11:42:22 two-way streets.

11:42:23 So I think we need to look at holistically look at.

11:42:28 That it's totally off top but brought together some of my

11:42:31 concerns.

11:42:31 And I agree with Councilman Reddick.

11:42:33 We need the lighting where we know that we have problems

11:42:36 with people's safety.

11:42:37 I.

11:42:39 >> I think you can see visually from that map where those

11:42:43 grids are colored in that -- and I'm not sure if I should be

11:42:46 sharing this on the Elmo as I am speaking -- bullet the

11:42:49 visual impact of that map should be evident that we are

11:42:55 putting lighting where there is known crime safety issues,

11:43:01 and

11:43:08 And I have pull that up here.

11:43:10 >> I have a number of questions so let me start with them.

11:43:12 What's the number of new lights that this bright light safe

11:43:18 nights program can use?

11:43:20 Can you tell me that?

11:43:21 It was 8,000 something?

11:43:29 >>JEAN DUNCAN: I'll start speaking whale he's giving

11:43:31 details.

11:43:33 >>MARY MULHERN: Oh, do you want to give your presentation

11:43:35 before I ask questions?

11:43:36 Were you done?

11:43:39 >> I think Lauren didn't quite get to the very end which had

11:43:43 a little detail about these costs that she was showing you

11:43:46 visually with her graphics.

11:43:48 >>MARY MULHERN: Do out want to finish that up before?

11:43:53 >>JEAN DUNCAN: If you want to.

11:43:54 We have information that we can share on the number of

11:43:56 lights we are planning to implement with the program.

11:43:58 So we can certainly speak to you about that.

11:44:00 But maybe if she can get to the end of her information, that

11:44:04 will help a little bit.

11:44:05 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay.

11:44:06 Go ahead.

11:44:15 Laura: This is hard to see unless you have it right in

11:44:23 front of the you.

11:44:24 But this kind of takes a lot of the information we

11:44:29 summarized in the other chart and details it on a very

11:44:33 detailed basis and it goes by light height and rate code and

11:44:42 shows how many lights on that system.

11:44:43 For example, on the first row there's 100 watt on that first

11:44:47 chart we showed you.

11:44:48 There is 20,675 of them on your system.

11:44:51 And it compares the current fixture to the L.E.D.

11:44:55 replacement.

11:44:56 And what we were trying to show you is trying to kind of get

11:44:59 an idea of what the energy savings would be.

11:45:02 So the second-to-the-last column on the right shows you your

11:45:06 energy savings.

11:45:07 But the final column shows you your net cost or savings.

11:45:12 So, yes, L.E.D.s are more energy efficient.

11:45:17 But in some cases, it is very hard to overcome the cost of

11:45:20 the fixtures.

11:45:21 So, for example, for the 100 watt cobras, you have a net

11:45:26 monthly difference of over $107,000 monthly, on an annual

11:45:30 basis if you were to change out.

11:45:30 Just a simple calculation, light for light.

11:45:43 When you get down to the larger lights you can see the

11:45:45 highlighted sections.

11:45:46 The 1,000 lights box, there's energy savings.

11:45:54 And it gives you a total savings, too of about 8,000 a month

11:46:02 if those were to be switched out.

11:46:04 This much is a high level calculation but gives you a feel

11:46:08 of the alternatives and how does it look on your system on

11:46:12 an annual basis.

11:46:13 That will be in the decision-making process.

11:46:22 I don't know if any further questions on this page.

11:46:26 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Any further questions by council members

11:46:28 on that item?

11:46:29 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

11:46:32 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you for the presentation.

11:46:33 It was very informative.

11:46:35 We have got one item.

11:46:37 Then we go to public item number 9.

11:46:39 Ms. Mulhern.

11:46:40 >>MARY MULHERN: Yes.

11:46:42 My questions are for Ms. Duncan.

11:46:46 I asked about the numbers.

11:46:49 I know it's around 8,000.

11:46:51 >>JEAN DUNCAN: It's about 8400 lights.

11:46:53 We have them spread over a five-year program.

11:46:56 We are getting about $450,000 a year towards this program to

11:47:01 implement that number of lights.

11:47:03 And we are looking to be about a 30% increase in coverage of

11:47:07 what we have right now.

11:47:08 >>MARY MULHERN: Did you read "The Tampa Tribune" editorial

11:47:15 page today?

11:47:17 >>JEAN DUNCAN: No, I didn't.

11:47:18 I normally do but I didn't get to it this morning.

11:47:20 >>MARY MULHERN: It's interesting because this is under

11:47:23 "other views."

11:47:26 It's from the Washington Post.

11:47:29 But the intergovernmental panel on climate changes coming

11:47:33 out with their findings in the next, I guess, month or next

11:47:37 week.

11:47:37 And they have concluded 95% of scientists have agreed that

11:47:41 the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the

11:47:46 concentration of carbon gases is increasing at a faster rate

11:47:52 than at any time in the last 22,000 years.

11:47:57 The past three decades were probably the hottest in 800

11:48:00 years.

11:48:01 Within this century, the draft report, average world

11:48:06 temperature will increase between 2 and 7º Fahrenheit.

11:48:09 I just wanted to put our discussion in perspective.

11:48:12 This isn't just about illumination, and it's not just about

11:48:16 cost, but it's about the fact that the City of Tampa has the

11:48:20 opportunity to reduce our carbon output.

11:48:24 And I think the responsibility -- so I really appreciate

11:48:30 both of your help with this.

11:48:32 And especially Ms. Duncan, that we want to work in this

11:48:41 direction toward using L.E.D. or whatever technology there

11:48:44 is to reduce carbon output.

11:48:46 And that's really -- I just feel like this is something that

11:48:50 we can do that will make us safer, that will eventually save

11:48:56 us money.

11:48:56 I don't care how you split it.

11:48:58 Eventually those energy savings, when you have lights that

11:49:01 only have to be replaced every ten years instead of every

11:49:08 five years, you are going to be saving money.

11:49:10 You are going to catch up to those costs no matter what the

11:49:13 tariffs are.

11:49:14 But I think you have to keep thatch in perspective.

11:49:18 So I was wondering -- I don't know.

11:49:22 These questions you can come back with a staff report at

11:49:27 some point and come back with it.

11:49:29 What's the reduction in -- if we were to replace all of

11:49:34 those 8400 streetlights, I would like to know if we replace

11:49:38 them with L.E.D. lights, what the reduction in energy will

11:49:45 be.

11:49:48 I think that would go a long way towards telling us how much

11:49:54 we could be cleaning up the air.

11:49:58 I know, we need to come back with that.

11:50:01 I want to know how long the payback would be on those

11:50:05 residential lights.

11:50:07 70% of our streetlights, our residential lights.

11:50:13 In that low wattage category.

11:50:17 How long would it take for us to get to pay that back?

11:50:23 And we talked about this.

11:50:25 But I just want to get it on the record that there are

11:50:28 grants out there and bond opportunities, and we do now have

11:50:33 a grant writer for the city.

11:50:34 Are we looking at possibilities for funding?

11:50:40 In the short term, if we fund these L.E.D. lights.

11:50:43 In the long-term we are going to make back that money in the

11:50:47 energy savings.

11:50:48 So I am wondering, especially on -- Jean, maybe you

11:50:53 remember, qualified energy conservation?

11:50:55 >> Yes.

11:50:56 I actually shared that with Terese Wilkes, our grant writer,

11:51:01 and asked to look into that.

11:51:04 You had another suggestion as well and I asked her to look

11:51:06 at those as well as any other opportunities that she could

11:51:09 find.

11:51:10 And it's not always, you know, a writing grant.

11:51:14 It could be some other type of grant.

11:51:16 But it's more of that component.

11:51:18 But I asked her to look and see what opportunities are out

11:51:20 there and also to let me know if there's some leg work we

11:51:23 can do to be assist with that.

11:51:25 We would like to work with her to try to find out what is

11:51:29 available.

11:51:30 >>MARY MULHERN: One of the things I suggested, Councilman

11:51:32 Reddick, that we could loon at subpoena Tampa urban area

11:51:36 security grants, and Tampa TPD, and homeland security grants

11:51:42 thatch we get for safety that maybe some go directly into

11:51:48 law enforcement to GOP into streetlighting.

11:51:51 Hope film they are looking at that.

11:51:54 And then, Jeanne, is it pretty safe to say that the cost of

11:52:00 these fixtures is going down?

11:52:05 The cost of L.E.D. lighting.

11:52:07 As tame goes by, the cost of the fixtures-oat.

11:52:10 >> I think we are all assuming -- just like we saw with

11:52:14 computers and iPhones and those types of things, that as

11:52:17 time goes on, hopefully short amount of time, the cost will

11:52:20 come down.

11:52:21 I think, Laura, you might have had a statistic you were

11:52:27 using in the last two years, how much that cost has been

11:52:30 reduced?

11:52:31 >> Laura: I think the larger lights the cost has come down

11:52:37 about three times over the last year.

11:52:39 It's something that we are watching.

11:52:41 And it's like any other emerging technology.

11:52:43 This is kind of new.

11:52:44 So there's new advances being made all the time on lighting,

11:52:51 and make sure and kind of be aware of what's going on.

11:52:55 But it's constantly changing.

11:52:57 You can see that already at the larger light level.

11:52:59 And so where you assume that it's going to continue.

11:53:03 People want these.

11:53:04 So it's going to continue to keep an eye on.

11:53:06 >>MARY MULHERN: So this is a tough question.

11:53:10 The cost of the fixtures is going down.

11:53:12 How do we reduce that amount, the amount that we are paying

11:53:18 in leasing those fixtures from teak off?

11:53:21 >> The way that works if the costs come down significantly

11:53:25 like change in cost we go back in and revise our tariffs.

11:53:29 So it's a process, but it's not a terribly complicated

11:53:34 process.

11:53:35 We just go back in and revise it.

11:53:38 And we work with staff to understand what type of lights the

11:53:41 city is interested in.

11:53:41 >>MARY MULHERN: So if the City of Tampa says to you, to the

11:53:45 PSC, these have come down since March, we now know that we

11:53:50 can get fixtures for this much and it's gone down that much,

11:53:54 you have to adjust?

11:53:55 >> Right.

11:53:56 We have to go through the filing process.

11:53:58 Typically what happens is if there's a real significant step

11:54:02 change you go in and file that with the Public Service

11:54:05 Commission and request approval of these new rates that you

11:54:08 are proposing.

11:54:09 And you go through that process and have them available.

11:54:14 Yes.

11:54:15 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.

11:54:18 I have to say this is a no brainer for me.

11:54:20 There's nothing bad about the City of Tampa adopting a

11:54:24 policy of replacing all our city lights with L.E.D.s or

11:54:29 whatever technology, uses less energy, and to see, they

11:54:36 provide more illumination and provide other benefits.

11:54:39 I hope we continue in that direction.

11:54:41 And I would like to make a motion that we have a staff

11:54:44 report, say, in -- maybe in six months as far as L.E.D.

11:54:54 lights, what the costs are, what the new technologies are,

11:54:58 and at that point you can come back and really quantify for

11:55:02 us what it would cost to retrofit or to use the bright light

11:55:10 safe nights, if they were all L.E.D. or new energy saving

11:55:15 technology.

11:55:16 >> If I take that motion now I have to have public comment

11:55:25 on that first.

11:55:25 If I may hold it to the business portion so we can listen to

11:55:26 the public.

11:55:27 I appreciate it very much.

11:55:28 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay.

11:55:29 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'm sorry, I apologize to the maker.

11:55:35 >>MIKE SUAREZ: A quick question and I will probably ask the

11:55:37 maker of that motion to include this in there.

11:55:39 But Jeanne, some of the things that we talked about in our

11:55:42 meeting, which is the low-hanging fruit, we already know

11:55:45 that the 1,000 watts are the ones that right now have a net

11:55:50 reduction in terms of where we are at.

11:55:54 And it is also because of the number of lights that are out

11:56:00 there that we can have a process.

11:56:02 I would like you to put together a process of replacing

11:56:05 those lights as we go along so that we can start as quickly

11:56:09 as possible.

11:56:10 I think of that when we are talking about the neighborhood

11:56:12 lights, because there's so many of them, one of the aspects

11:56:17 that you had mentioned in terms of the cost reduction,

11:56:20 there's still a process that we don't control, which is PSC.

11:56:24 And I think that right now we have got an opportunity to

11:56:27 look at those 1,000 watts and say, all right, let's replace

11:56:31 these as quickly as possible.

11:56:33 And I know that that also is tied up in leases but there are

11:56:38 also some that are already 1,000 watts that are not leased

11:56:41 because of them having been there for many, many, many

11:56:45 years.

11:56:47 Let's see if we can put together a process to bring to us,

11:56:51 because with the budget coming up we want to make sure that

11:56:53 we make it as budget neutral as we can and then plan for

11:56:57 next year, to what amounts we are going to have to put in

11:57:00 the budget to replace these on an ongoing basis.

11:57:03 I think that the bright lights safe natures -- I can't say

11:57:07 that, I don't know why -- is a program that's a great way of

11:57:12 doing it.

11:57:12 And I think as we go through that whole process of looking

11:57:16 at those 8500 lights that we say, all right, how many of

11:57:19 these are -- we need to replace because of repairs?

11:57:24 And let's replace it with an L.E.D. light and put that cost

11:57:28 going forward.

11:57:28 And of course we need to figure out what the lease is and

11:57:31 everything else.

11:57:32 But maybe come up with a report to indicate all that to us,

11:57:36 so we have a real dollar amount to go forward with all this.

11:57:41 Everything that Councilwoman Mulhern said is correct in

11:57:44 terms of the way that it is a no brainer in terms of how

11:57:47 much safer it makes our street, how much less expensive it

11:57:51 will be in the long run and how we reduce our carbon

11:57:57 footprint by doing those other two.

11:57:59 So, you know, let's come up with a plan and process and go

11:58:02 forward.

11:58:03 Thank you, chair.

11:58:04 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you very much for appearing.

11:58:06 I appreciate it very much.

11:58:07 And I'll take that motion that Ms. Mulhern made after we

11:58:10 finish the comments here.

11:58:12 Thank you.

11:58:13 Item number 9.

11:58:17 Rules and procedures.

11:58:17 >>HARRY COHEN: Would you like to entertain a motion to

11:58:25 extend for 15 minutes?

11:58:27 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I would like to ask for 30.

11:58:29 I have a motion by Mr. Cohen for 30 minutes.

11:58:31 Second by Mr. Suarez.

11:58:32 All in favor of the motion please indicate by saying aye.

11:58:35 Opposed nay.

11:58:36 The ayes have it unanimously.

11:58:38 Yes, sir.

11:58:38 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Good morning, Martin Shelby, City Council

11:58:42 attorney here to discuss your rules of procedure.

11:58:45 And in preparation for this, I provided you with a copy of

11:58:47 the rules of procedure in the background material, and also

11:58:52 a copy of newly enacted state law that affects all boards

11:58:59 and commissions throughout the state.

11:59:00 And this past legislative session, the legislative passing,

11:59:06 the governor signed Senate bill 50 which created a new

11:59:10 section 286.20114, public meetings, reasonable opportunity

11:59:14 to be heard.

11:59:16 And what that forces agencies, municipalities, boards

11:59:21 throughout the state, is to catch up to what the Tampa City

11:59:27 Council has been doing for years now, which is a very open

11:59:32 and transparent public comment process.

11:59:35 And basically, it doesn't affect this Tampa City Council

11:59:40 nearly as much as it does many other municipalities and

11:59:43 boards throughout the city because this is the way you have

11:59:48 been doing business.

11:59:49 And basically why I am here is to let you know that it takes

11:59:52 effect October 1st.

11:59:53 And in anticipation of that I am going to be asking City

11:59:56 Council to allow me to make some minor changes to your rules

11:59:59 of procedure to be able to more track with state language.

12:00:04 But in terms of the way you do business, it will have very

12:00:07 little effect with the exception of a couple of minor

12:00:09 things.

12:00:10 Number one is I would like to be able to change the name of

12:00:14 rule 5 to conduct of business to public participation, and

12:00:19 slightly amend the order and language of some of those

12:00:22 items.

12:00:24 The other two suggestions that I do have for you, council,

12:00:29 are to change the process at the end of the meeting, to

12:00:34 continue to run the tape and to televise the public comments

12:00:37 that you do take at the end of the meeting.

12:00:39 That is something that you normally do take public comment,

12:00:46 if there is anybody here.

12:00:50 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: The 500 people that hi speak about?

12:00:53 >>MARTIN SHELBY: But let me just say City Council, this

12:00:55 board has been very proactive in seeking public comments.

12:01:00 It is very unusual, for instance, at a lot of boards to take

12:01:04 public comment at workshops.

12:01:06 Now, what this requires is that people have a reasonable

12:01:10 opportunity to be heard on a proposition before a board or

12:01:13 commission.

12:01:14 The opportunity to be heard need not occur at the same

12:01:17 meeting that you take official action if the opportunity

12:01:20 occurred at a meeting that is during the decision-making

12:01:22 process, and is within reasonable proximity and time before

12:01:26 the meeting at which the board or commission takes the

12:01:30 official action, and what in this case what you have done

12:01:33 for the past several years now is take public comment at

12:01:37 workshops.

12:01:38 This board has a history of seeking public input early in

12:01:41 the process, and it helps start your decision making.

12:01:46 And council, what you also do regularly is when you do make

12:01:49 a motion is to put something on a future agenda.

12:01:52 So therefore people do have the opportunity to have the

12:01:56 notice, to have the opportunity to give you public input,

12:01:59 not necessarily at the meetings, but between the time they

12:02:02 learn of it at the meetings, and then also to come at the

12:02:06 meetings and be able to share with you their position.

12:02:09 And you incorporate that into your decision-making process.

12:02:13 So your end product when you finally do come to the public

12:02:16 hearings, the public has been involved and active in the

12:02:19 process, continually up until that time.

12:02:22 So I am going to ask one more request of you, and that is

12:02:29 something that would affect your new business.

12:02:32 There is something in the new section, the new Florida

12:02:37 statute, that says that you don't have to take public

12:02:39 comment when the official act involves no more than a

12:02:44 ministerial act, including but not limited to approval of

12:02:47 the minutes and ceremonial proclamation.

12:02:50 So, for instance, if you take a -- make a motion to set

12:02:54 something on a future agenda, that's ministerial.

12:02:59 If you, at the end of a meeting, make a motion for new

12:03:03 business that is a substantive matter, a policy decision,

12:03:08 and you are not going to be setting it for a future agenda

12:03:11 but take official action, I would ask you to consider

12:03:14 perhaps setting it for future agenda so that people do have

12:03:19 the time to respond to it at a future meeting.

12:03:21 But if it is time sensitive, it would be appropriate to then

12:03:25 just open the floor, if somebody should be here to want to

12:03:28 comment, and make a comment, to be able to say that you have

12:03:31 received public comment before you take official action.

12:03:35 That happens very, very rarely, and it shouldn't really make

12:03:39 much of a difference in the way you do business.

12:03:42 But that being the case, only there's any other changes --

12:03:46 in and out, I know council is working on an order of

12:03:48 business and is in the process of working through that.

12:03:50 And you only had one meeting with that new process.

12:03:53 And so I am not making any recommendations in terms of the

12:03:57 order of business or the to make any changes unless council

12:04:00 wishes to direct me.

12:04:01 All I am asking is for direction to bring back amendments

12:04:06 for the rules of procedure to help implement better this new

12:04:12 Florida statute.

12:04:13 And that's my report.

12:04:15 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you.

12:04:16 Mrs. Montelione?

12:04:17 >>LISA MONTELIONE: I was going to be ask for an example of

12:04:20 the new business item that -- and then you followed it up by

12:04:26 saying it was rarely, so I don't -- something as substantive

12:04:33 that would require come back doesn't pop up into my mind.

12:04:35 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Well, obviously if you make a motion to

12:04:38 direct me to draft a resolution of a policy statement, that

12:04:43 would come back because you would have top vote on the

12:04:45 resolution.

12:04:46 If you make a motion for the chairman to send a letter, and

12:04:50 that letter is not anticipated to come back before City

12:04:53 Council, it might be -- it might be better for that letter

12:04:56 to come back, or if it's a time sensitive issue and a letter

12:05:00 has to go out, then on that rare indication you might want

12:05:05 to open the floor to take public comment.

12:05:08 >>LISA MONTELIONE: And I guess one of the things I was

12:05:11 going to -- I have got notes here, things in our rules and

12:05:15 procedure that I would like to see discussed today that mate

12:05:19 change in the future -- and that's one of them.

12:05:21 The letters that we request either for the chair to sign, or

12:05:25 resolutions, because there has been many occasions where the

12:05:30 first time -- I only speak to myself, not the others but I

12:05:36 think it's all of us -- the first time we see a letter is

12:05:40 when we are sitting here during a meeting.

12:05:42 And it's happened, I think in, two years it's probably

12:05:45 happened maybe a handful of times.

12:05:47 So I would like to request that just as we require people

12:05:54 who are giving presentations to submit 24 hours in advance,

12:05:58 I would at least like to have a day's notice to review the

12:06:03 letter, and either, you know, make suggestions or be

12:06:08 prepared weapon we come before council to discuss it.

12:06:11 So that was one of the items on my list.

12:06:14 So I'm glad you mentioned that.

12:06:17 >>MARTIN SHELBY: May a dress it very quickly?

12:06:19 Best practice.

12:06:21 Is to have something set for a future agenda.

12:06:23 That's the best practice.

12:06:25 Because that gives notice to not only fellow council members

12:06:29 but gives notice to your constituents, allows you to seek

12:06:32 input if you wish, and to get input if the public wishes to

12:06:37 offer it.

12:06:38 That's the best practice.

12:06:40 The only thing you have to be concerned about -- and if

12:06:43 that's a practice that council wishes to have a letter sent

12:06:45 out in advance, what you have to avoid doing is responding

12:06:49 to that letter before the City Council meeting, because it

12:06:53 would be the response to that letter to another council

12:06:55 member that would run afoul of the sunshine law, the public

12:06:59 meetings law.

12:07:00 So that would just be the thing.

12:07:02 >>LISA MONTELIONE: I was just thinking when somebody wants

12:07:05 to have a letter sent -- a lot of them have to do with when

12:07:11 we are in legislative session or something happening in

12:07:12 Congress that we want to send a letter or a resolution to

12:07:21 our elected officials.

12:07:23 Those office offices, our legislative delegation, that we at

12:07:27 least have 24 hours to look at what is being requested,

12:07:32 either resolution, or letter.

12:07:35 And, had I mean, there's been a couple here that was

12:07:39 directed at the mayor.

12:07:40 So, you know, before we send something to the mayor, or make

12:07:43 a statement or resolution, a letter and so forth, I would

12:07:46 like to have advance notice and be able to see it or review

12:07:49 it.

12:07:50 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Council's pleasure.

12:07:54 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: North for the record, let me get a

12:07:57 scenario. Council asked the chair, whoever the chair is, to

12:08:00 send a letter.

12:08:01 Butt then whoever that chairperson is makes the letter but

12:08:05 before he or she can send it review by council members?

12:08:10 Is that what we are asking?

12:08:13 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Yes, if a letter is being sent and sent

12:08:18 for all council members and we are making a statement, I

12:08:20 would like to know what the letter says before it goes out.

12:08:24 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: All right.

12:08:24 Then we are going to apply that to department heads and

12:08:28 everyone coming in?

12:08:30 >> What do you mean department heads?

12:08:31 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Well, I see things happening here -- and

12:08:34 I have no comment on that -- but what I am saying is, in

12:08:38 this case you are asking this chair, before he sends a

12:08:41 letter out, so then I have got to distribute -- I just want

12:08:44 to know the process.

12:08:46 I have to distribute the letter.

12:08:47 I have to wait back for comment from six council members to

12:08:51 okay the letter.

12:08:52 I can't do it for one.

12:08:53 And then that letter will go out the next council meeting

12:08:56 which is approved by council because everyone reviewed the

12:08:59 letter.

12:08:59 Am I correct?

12:09:02 >>LISA MONTELIONE: I think Councilman Cohen can state it.

12:09:05 >>HARRY COHEN: I think actually she's trying to make it

12:09:08 easier on you not harder, and if a council member is going

12:09:11 to bring in a request that, that they should distribute a

12:09:14 draft beforehand.

12:09:16 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I appreciate that very much.

12:09:17 I really do.

12:09:17 I just wanted it clear in my head.

12:09:21 Thank you, Mr. Cohen, for your direction there.

12:09:22 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Mr. Vice chair.

12:09:27 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Mrs. Mulhern or anyone else?

12:09:29 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I have one question.

12:09:31 In relation to what Mrs. Montelione was just saying, in

12:09:33 relation to what you were bringing up, Mr. Shelby, is that

12:09:39 on things that are -- and that would be, I think as you

12:09:42 mentioned, ministerial or, you know, there's no wait behind

12:09:46 it.

12:09:47 Because we are not putting in a resolution.

12:09:50 We are talking about a letter.

12:09:51 It's a little different.

12:09:53 Are you suggesting that it be provided to the public to

12:09:56 comment on prior to us sending it out?

12:10:01 Or are you saying that when someone makes a motion to send a

12:10:05 letter, let's site to our legislative delegation, or the

12:10:08 governor or something else, that that letter be brought back

12:10:11 to the next regular session so that it can be commented on?

12:10:17 I mean, I guess it's either/or.

12:10:22 >>MARTIN SHELBY: It is and either or, and it is council's

12:10:25 ultimate decision.

12:10:26 However, I would just state that a letter stating a position

12:10:32 of the City Council, which is done by a motion and vote, is

12:10:37 not necessarily ministerial.

12:10:39 It is actually a substantive policy.

12:10:42 It may not be in the form of a resolution but is being

12:10:46 communicated ate this form of government, this legislative

12:10:49 body, under the letterhead signed by the chair stating what

12:10:53 the City Council's policy is or position is.

12:10:55 So it is best to be able to, as I said, give notice,

12:11:03 obviously, to the City Council members so they are not

12:11:07 forced to make a decision being given a piece of paper

12:11:09 immediately, nor some situation giving direction to the

12:11:13 chair and then allowing the chair to craft a letter and go

12:11:16 out under signature without you having seen it.

12:11:18 The best practice would be if it's not time sensitive to

12:11:22 actually -- and the only caveat I have in all of that, which

12:11:28 is that the way I look at the letters that we write

12:11:31 specifically, on issues that either concern us directly or

12:11:35 indirectly, because we have done both, is that I look at it

12:11:41 as more of what they do in Congress when they, you know,

12:11:45 insert something in the congressional record, the sense of

12:11:48 the Congress is this, it is not in any way have weight of

12:11:52 law, or even weight of any contained of direction other than

12:11:58 asking for a position that we have all together agreed to

12:12:03 publicly and voted on.

12:12:04 So that's why I have a little bit of, you know, confusion as

12:12:07 to why would it have to be brought back?

12:12:10 That's the only reason I look at it, because we bring it up

12:12:15 publicly, we mention it.

12:12:17 There may not be any discussion.

12:12:18 It may be something that we all agree to, and we provide a

12:12:21 letter to the delegation or to the governor, whoever else.

12:12:27 I think that on its face is the public part of it.

12:12:32 Now, I don't know if that goes against what the state

12:12:38 statute is saying or if it's just an in-between thing.

12:12:41 Again I don't have a problem either way.

12:12:43 But it just seems not that it provides an additional amount,

12:12:47 but there is time frame issues.

12:12:48 I think at times, you know, we have had constituents come to

12:12:52 us and ask us to, you know, bring it up before council.

12:12:57 Usually those are fairly simple things, because there is no

12:13:00 weight of law.

12:13:01 There's no weight of ordinance or resolution.

12:13:03 And, in fact, those constituents that come to me and say, I

12:13:06 want a resolution from the council to say this.

12:13:09 I usually tell them, I won't put a resolution forward.

12:13:12 But I will ask for a letter from our council saying we agree

12:13:18 with this position, or we would like this other body to look

12:13:21 at something that we think is important.

12:13:25 Again, you know, I guess it depends on what that issue is in

12:13:31 I can maaing a determination whether or not we should go

12:13:32 forward or have a letter presented prior to the fact, you

12:13:36 know.

12:13:36 So, anyway, I think that Mrs. Montelione's point is well

12:13:41 taken.

12:13:42 I'm not sure how we are going to put it into our rules of

12:13:45 procedure.

12:13:45 >>MARTIN SHELBY: If I may make a suggestion, Mr. Chairman?

12:13:54 You don't have it to really amend your rules unless you wish

12:13:56 to.

12:13:57 But you could make it a practice of this council as a

12:13:59 courtesy to your members that if you are intending to bring

12:14:02 something before council for consideration that you would

12:14:05 didn't it at least 24 hours in advance to the members so at

12:14:10 least they will be able to have reflected upon it before you

12:14:13 have to vote on it.

12:14:15 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Let me just say that I agree with you.

12:14:17 I agree with the input from different members.

12:14:19 When you read that letter it's not just one member to

12:14:22 another member.

12:14:22 It's all seven members.

12:14:23 I get with that openness.

12:14:25 And if I may go to Mr. Reddick and Ms. Mulhern.

12:14:28 I'm running short of time and I want to give the public all

12:14:31 the due time they will need.

12:14:32 >>FRANK REDDICK: Mr. Chair, you know, there are times

12:14:37 when -- and time sensitive issues, because when we had an

12:14:44 issue recent limit where we were talking about in

12:14:54 Tallahassee, the issue came up based on the mayor submitted

12:15:00 a letter.

12:15:01 They wanted council to submit one, and get it back next

12:15:05 month.

12:15:05 I mean, I wouldn't have time to send something 24 hours in

12:15:11 advance and everybody see this.

12:15:13 You know, the thing that -- and I have seen it in most other

12:15:16 government agencies -- they have given discretion to the

12:15:20 chair to write the letter and submit it.

12:15:31 Of that happens in most government agencies.

12:15:34 All the tame, when the commission was saying, Mr. Chair,

12:15:37 write the letter and send it on behalf of the commission.

12:15:43 And the same thing.

12:15:44 We have done that.

12:15:45 And I have got copies of the letter that the chair has sent

12:15:49 out, and I think all of us have.

12:15:52 And, I am mean, we make things more difficult than it should

12:15:59 be.

12:15:59 And if we go 5, it will be 10.

12:16:07 So I want to keep it as simple as possible.

12:16:11 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Ms. Mulhern?

12:16:12 >>MARY MULHERN: (off record) I want to hear from the

12:16:15 public.

12:16:16 >>MARTIN SHELBY: If I could add one more thing about Mr.

12:16:19 Reddick said because it's rather important.

12:16:21 There's an attorney general's opinion and it's been subject,

12:16:24 can council vote on something that's not on the agenda?

12:16:27 Or does the public meetings law require something to have to

12:16:30 be on the agenda and N advance of the meeting before you can

12:16:32 vote on it?

12:16:33 And the answer is clearly no.

12:16:35 It doesn't.

12:16:36 Your agenda has been noticed.

12:16:38 You have given notice of the time, place of your public

12:16:43 meeting and you can add things and amend your agenda.

12:16:45 You are not locked into what's on the agenda.

12:16:47 The other thing is the last section of this new section

12:16:50 states Florida statute, and action taken by the board or

12:16:54 commission which is found to be in violation of this section

12:16:57 is not void as a result of that violation.

12:17:00 So basically, it really doesn't have any legal practical

12:17:04 effects on what you have passed.

12:17:08 So in terms of that, the only thing I would suggest with

12:17:11 regard to pro bowl, time is of the essence.

12:17:17 If you want to be in full compliance with Tampa spirit of

12:17:20 this law, you would just say, is there anybody in the public

12:17:22 who wants to comment before we vote on it?

12:17:25 And then vote on it and that one resolve the issue entirely.

12:17:29 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you very much.

12:17:30 We go to public comments.

12:17:31 Anyone in the audience care to speak for three minutes on

12:17:33 any item on the agenda?

12:17:34 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Well, I have other rules of procedure.

12:17:46 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Oh, I'm sorry.

12:17:47 Let's continue then.

12:17:52 All right.

12:17:52 Public?

12:17:52 Public?

12:17:53 Public?

12:17:54 We'll bring that up again.

12:18:01 >> Good morning.

12:18:04 Spencer Kass, Virginia park neighborhood association.

12:18:06 I want to thank you for having a meeting to discuss the

12:18:09 L.E.D. lighting and I hope you can really understand the

12:18:11 public's frustration at this point with what's been going

12:18:14 on.

12:18:15 First of all, the city did the lighting audit I believe in

12:18:19 2005 whereof they talked about areas that don't have their

12:18:21 fair share of streetlighting.

12:18:22 And since then we have decided a fair share of

12:18:26 streetlighting because none of us want to see any

12:18:29 neighborhood, we want to see them get lighting just like

12:18:32 everybody else.

12:18:33 When it comes to the L.E.D.s, this goes all the way back

12:18:36 to the franchise agreement that has been negotiated.

12:18:40 We ask that L.E.D. be added on.

12:18:43 We were told built administration at the time, the franchise

12:18:47 agreement.

12:18:48 Now here we are years and years later.

12:18:51 I can tell you the county advisory committee that I have

12:18:53 been on, we have been pushing very hard on TECO to get this

12:18:56 information on L.E.D. streetlights.

12:18:59 But the issue we have now is that TECO, the energy

12:19:01 provider -- and I have nothing against them, that's their

12:19:04 job, their job is to provide energy -- to give you what the

12:19:09 cheapest force for you to use to, why it's like going to a

12:19:13 gas station and saying, is that an energy efficient car or

12:19:17 not?

12:19:17 And every time they do their study they say oh, the energy

12:19:21 efficient car -- that's basically what TECO has done.

12:19:26 This is one of the largest L.E.D. suppliers.

12:19:28 This is their 100 watt replacement.

12:19:34 100 watt replacement L.E.D. streetlights.

12:19:37 It costs $99.

12:19:39 I have their press release here.

12:19:41 Says $99.

12:19:43 The payback period on it one year.

12:19:45 Not ten years.

12:19:48 And just so we are aware, this L.E.D. streetlight has a ten

12:19:52 year warranty.

12:19:52 But let's they are completely wrong in their calculation,

12:19:55 not a one-year, but eights two-year payback period, they are

12:19:59 off by a factor of 50%.

12:20:01 Tampa that's just four years getting a 25% rate of return on

12:20:05 your investment?

12:20:06 Now the city according do what be we heard has 20,000 watts,

12:20:13 if the numbers are right you are getting back $2 million a

12:20:15 year as a rate of return on your investment.

12:20:19 If they are wrong, by 50% it's $Z 1 million.

12:20:25 Now TECO says we have top go through the public utility

12:20:28 commission and if you want to buy these.

12:20:29 I spoke to TECO.

12:20:31 And what I can tell, there's no requirement that you have to

12:20:33 buy your streetlights through TECO.

12:20:35 You can buy them straight.

12:20:37 Out don't have to gone through the public service utility

12:20:40 commission.

12:20:41 What I would advise is stop signing a ten year contract,

12:20:44 because that's not helping anybody with anything.

12:20:46 I mean, you are gist tying up for ten years.

12:20:50 If you have to put a more tomorrow, stop what you are doing

12:20:54 now, because let's say after a year or two years you could

12:21:02 throw them in the garbage.

12:21:03 Bull I would just encourage you to stop wasting time and

12:21:07 consider it.

12:21:07 Thank you.

12:21:09 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you very much, sir.

12:21:11 Next, please.

12:21:12 >> Good afternoon.

12:21:14 I'm Susan Glickman, for clean energy, also a property owner

12:21:20 in Tampa.

12:21:21 Am I correct that we are no longer on television?

12:21:24 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: No, you are on television.

12:21:25 >> Okay.

12:21:26 I tried to understand what you were doing.

12:21:32 I really asked to be here because normally I wake up every

12:21:35 day to fight climate change and now hear to fight about

12:21:40 crime.

12:21:40 There are two things that I want to mention.

12:21:42 And actually the gentleman before metropolitan sort of

12:21:44 alluded to this issue of state policy and policy that you

12:21:49 need to be considering what's going on, on the conservation,

12:21:52 goal setting process, the public energy efficient act, and I

12:22:00 have some questions, and I'm very sorry that TECO left the

12:22:04 room because there are some questions that you need to be

12:22:06 asking about why they are not including streetlighting and

12:22:08 the potential study that they are putting FAD now for the

12:22:12 conservation goal setting.

12:22:13 By law it happens once every five years.

12:22:15 And then the second piece of that, which has been the gold

12:22:21 standard, there's a company right across the bay, in Tampa

12:22:24 Bay, that I believe -- and I have been doing this work now

12:22:27 for 14 years, and the L.E.D. lighting, because they have a

12:22:31 current low voltage that works over long distances that can

12:22:35 actually change the cost potential. Anyway, I am going to

12:22:38 mention those things.

12:22:39 So let I won't be here too long.

12:22:44 Why aren't they looking at this?

12:22:46 It was alluded to earlier you would be naive to not

12:22:49 understand the utility business model. If they make a

12:22:51 guaranteed rate of return on what they spent, and they don't

12:22:54 make money helping TECO use better energy.

12:22:56 So you need to be looking at that.

12:22:58 I have no way to comment on some of those numbers because I

12:23:00 don't know what those are.

12:23:02 So I think the City Council would be perfect lip appropriate

12:23:05 to ask for stakeholders who actually have technical

12:23:09 expertise, the southern alliance for clean energy, I lobby

12:23:12 in the legislature, we intervene at proceedings, we go toe

12:23:16 to toe with utilities and utility planning process.

12:23:18 I too was incredibly disappointed at the city performance

12:23:22 when it came to the franchise agreement B.even the simplest

12:23:25 things the city was unwilling to hang in there.

12:23:28 I heard TECO's person at the county sustainability the other

12:23:33 day and he said that Florida was a leader in energy

12:23:36 efficiency and that's absolutely untrue.

12:23:37 There are 17 states with a percentage and a half annually of

12:23:42 savings.

12:23:43 Florida is .25 to .35 because they are at different places.

12:23:47 There's so much more.

12:23:48 The first thing utilities do is deploy a two-year payback.

12:23:52 So the leaders in the country to get a percentage, or

12:23:55 percentage and a half of savings, 626 to 83% utilities and

12:24:01 TECO is one of them takes off the table.

12:24:03 There is so much more what weak do with the low hanging

12:24:06 fruit, so streetlighting should be part of Tampa Electric

12:24:08 Company's potential technical, potential study in the

12:24:13 process, and I think that's something you should ask for.

12:24:16 And one more thing I will wrap up is that I asked, it is a

12:24:20 little unfair to follow the November pilot.

12:24:22 I had asked you to invite stakeholders to the table and I

12:24:25 want to make sure that you all talk to -- they have taken

12:24:30 all the electronics out of the L.E.D.

12:24:32 I will wrap up.

12:24:33 Making it much less expensive to have all the power supply

12:24:34 at the bottom of the pole, and that makes maintenance

12:24:42 cheaper.

12:24:42 And it's new.

12:24:43 And one thing they did say is the technology is changing.

12:24:46 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'm sorry.

12:24:46 >> No problem.

12:24:47 Thank you very much.

12:24:49 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you very much.

12:24:50 We appreciate it very much.

12:24:51 Next, please.

12:24:54 >> Susan Long, 920 east broad.

12:25:00 I don't have the technical information for the L.E.D.s but

12:25:03 I will tell you this.

12:25:04 I know they last infinitely longer than the regular ones.

12:25:10 I also know that they give off better light for larger

12:25:14 distance.

12:25:14 And I look at the street lights on my street that cover

12:25:22 circle that gets up, it's pitch black, and I think wouldn't

12:25:26 it be Nace if one L.E.D. light so we can actually seat the

12:25:31 three or four spaces? Given the little bit of information

12:25:35 that I do have return on investment on L.E.D.s it's huge

12:25:39 compared to the lights we think currently use.

12:25:41 I seal no reason that you have to look at ten years.

12:25:44 Buy them up front.

12:25:49 And with the energy savings they are, the claim of one year

12:25:52 return on investment, probably two years.

12:25:59 Be a pessimist and go four years.

12:26:03 It's still better than what we are doing now.

12:26:05 But my other comment to switch gears.

12:26:07 I want to talk about cameras just briefly.

12:26:09 We have all these cameras that are utilized predominantly

12:26:12 but not exclusively downtown.

12:26:15 Those are not the major areas, major crime areas.

12:26:18 Why don't you put some where we have the prostitutes and the

12:26:23 drug dealers?

12:26:24 Why don't you put some in some of the other neighborhoods

12:26:26 that are having difficulties with crime?

12:26:28 Because those cameras, if they are well advertised, will

12:26:31 deter a lot of that.

12:26:34 We have them.

12:26:34 They work.

12:26:35 Let's use them for something productive.

12:26:37 Thank you.

12:26:39 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you so very much.

12:26:40 Okay.

12:26:41 Ms. Montelione?

12:26:43 I'm sorry, I apologize to you.

12:26:45 >>LISA MONTELIONE: That's okay.

12:26:48 I understand.

12:26:50 The notes that I had made, some of them refer back to when

12:26:53 we had the strategic planning session.

12:26:59 And we did as attorney Shelby mentioned, we made change in

12:27:06 the order of our regular meeting.

12:27:09 So I just want to say that I think that is great, and I

12:27:13 think we should continue it and I think we should make it

12:27:16 permanent.

12:27:17 I also think that with the public comment like we just had

12:27:21 now with the workshop meeting, it probably would have been

12:27:24 helpful to hear from Mrs. Glickman before the TECO workshop.

12:27:29 So I would like to discuss and talk about it, and think

12:27:33 about how we can change the public comments on workshop

12:27:39 days.

12:27:39 I think that, I personally think it should be done similar

12:27:43 to the way we do regular meetings where we have an agenda

12:27:45 item, and if you want to speak on that agenda item, that you

12:27:49 are free to do so.

12:27:55 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: If that's the way we feel, no problem

12:27:57 with that. At the end of each one.

12:27:59 But public comment --

12:28:02 >>LISA MONTELIONE: I think we used to do that.

12:28:07 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Well, the problem if you lead this at the

12:28:10 end of each workshop does that mean each individual or each

12:28:13 workshop session?

12:28:14 So it's very confusing.

12:28:15 So I think if you want that done, workshop 4, 5 or 6, public

12:28:20 comment --

12:28:22 >>LISA MONTELIONE: After each one.

12:28:23 So people who want to talk on that topic don't have to stay

12:28:26 to the end.

12:28:29 So I make that in the form of a motion.

12:28:34 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: As soon as we finish with the

12:28:37 suggestions, I am going to go back and ask the public to

12:28:40 speak.

12:28:42 I don't want anyone coming here --

12:28:45 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Got it.

12:28:46 Something else that I would like to have council think about

12:28:48 is, it hasn't happened recently, but there have been times

12:28:52 when wave more than two ceremonial items in the morning

12:28:57 where people are giving commendations or receiving

12:29:00 commendations, that sort of thing.

12:29:02 I would like to ask to limit that to two, especially on

12:29:05 regular days, because I think once we had like four on a

12:29:10 regular agenda, and we didn't actually end up getting to our

12:29:14 business portion of the meeting till, now, close to 10:30.

12:29:19 And it's not on -- if you look at page 3 of our rules, and

12:29:24 the order of our regular meeting, ceremonial isn't even on

12:29:29 this list.

12:29:30 It goes invocation, pledge, roll call, adoption, approval of

12:29:33 agenda, public comment, request of public reconsideration of

12:29:37 matters.

12:29:37 There isn't a space for ceremonial on our list at all.

12:29:44 So I would suggest, A, we put in the there, and, B, we limit

12:29:47 to the two.

12:29:49 That's my second point that hi wanted to make.

12:29:54 And I think we already made those.

12:30:00 I will offer this as well.

12:30:01 If there is a time where it is time sensitive and we need to

12:30:05 do commendations maybe we can add it to the night meetings

12:30:08 when we have land use meetings scheduled for that evening,

12:30:14 that month.

12:30:15 Maybe we can do a ceremonial there if there's the need for

12:30:20 it.

12:30:23 And then the last thing that I made reference to earlier

12:30:26 today, when Jaya and Adam were here, is I have been getting

12:30:33 a lot of requests from the public on alternative methods for

12:30:38 them to participate publicly in our meeting.

12:30:43 And, you know, the technology is such where I think we need

12:30:49 to move forward, we need to look at other options, and if we

12:30:53 don't, we will anti-quate ourselves and be so far behind.

12:30:59 So a lot of meetings, a lot of citizens who want to

12:31:02 participate but simply cannot get here at 9:00 a.m.

12:31:05 And, you know, they send e-mails, or they can send letters,

12:31:09 or they just call our offices and translate what they want

12:31:15 to say and give it to us so now we are getting into a third

12:31:19 party.

12:31:19 I want to have -- to have us take a serious look at ways for

12:31:24 people to give a of three-minute public comment, either, you

12:31:29 know, by Skype, or some other technological means.

12:31:34 I have got tango on my phone and I talk face to face with

12:31:39 people all over the country in realtime, there's no

12:31:41 buffering, it's like they are there in the room.

12:31:43 And I think it's something that we really seriously need to

12:31:46 consider and start looking at.

12:31:50 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: We go to the public on those three items

12:31:52 that were brought up by Mrs. Montelione.

12:31:54 Does anyone want to speak on those items?

12:31:56 Please come forward.

12:31:57 Anyone in the back row want to come speak on those items,

12:32:00 please come forward.

12:32:01 Anyone in the front row?

12:32:03 Anyone in the dais?

12:32:05 Mr. Cohen.

12:32:05 >>HARRY COHEN: So Councilman Montelione made three points.

12:32:08 Let me very briefly give my two cents on them.

12:32:11 I'm sure everyone else will do the same.

12:32:14 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I need an additional 15 minutes.

12:32:18 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Motion by Mrs. Montelione, second by Mr.

12:32:21 Suarez.

12:32:21 All in favor of the motion?

12:32:24 15 minutes.

12:32:24 >>HARRY COHEN: On the issue of the workshop public

12:32:27 comments, I think that's feign to clarify that and to make

12:32:30 sure that the comments are concurrent with the workshop.

12:32:33 On the commendation limits, my view is that's only been a

12:32:36 problem than on AP very few occasions.

12:32:40 I do think, however, that we have had a problem in confusing

12:32:44 ceremonial activities with substantive activities.

12:32:46 And the fact of the matter is a commendation or ceremonial

12:32:50 activity should only last a few minutes.

12:32:52 It shouldn't go on for an hour.

12:32:54 Now, I have personally thought's presentation was very, very

12:32:59 interesting and I enjoyed of the.

12:33:01 I enjoyed the MPO and I look forward to it when it comes

12:33:05 back to the Mon but it was under ceremonial activities.

12:33:08 And really substantive matters should not in are not where

12:33:14 they should be. If there's not a place for them, then we

12:33:16 need to find a place for them so we can better calibrate

12:33:20 what our agenda is going to look like in the morning.

12:33:22 The second issue if we are going to limit the number of

12:33:25 commendations which means we will limit the number we will

12:33:27 do in any given month, it's then got to be divided equally

12:33:33 among council members.

12:33:34 You have to make sure that everybody has the same

12:33:36 opportunity to schedule the commendations that are important

12:33:40 to them.

12:33:40 My view is we should leave that alone.

12:33:42 It not been that big of a problem and just use our own

12:33:46 discretion in trying to set those equitably.

12:33:50 On the third issue, I have to have see more.

12:33:52 But I do have some concerns about opening them up at public

12:33:56 comments, all different forms of electronic participation,

12:34:00 particularly we are going to have to have a broader

12:34:04 discussion about that, I think, to be see where that's

12:34:07 really going to go.

12:34:07 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Can I make a comment about what

12:34:17 Councilman Cohen said about this morning and the order?

12:34:20 There is literally, on our regular meetings, there is no

12:34:25 ceremonial or commendation item on there.

12:34:28 >>MIKE SUAREZ: You are right because today is not a regular

12:34:31 meeting.

12:34:34 If you look at the conduct of business or rule 5-I, it does

12:34:39 state specifically that the commendations are done

12:34:42 ceremonial activities are done at the workshop.

12:34:45 That's the only time that we have them scheduled.

12:34:48 It's in our rules already.

12:34:49 I agree with Councilman Cohen and what he says, which is I

12:34:53 don't think that there's been a big problem with ceremonial

12:34:56 for the first partly.

12:34:57 So I disagree with putting it anywhere else.

12:35:01 Because it's not on a regular meeting.

12:35:03 It shouldn't be a regular meeting.

12:35:04 It's only a workshop.

12:35:05 That's the first thing.

12:35:06 The second thing back to your point about public input, hear

12:35:11 is the problem that we have with other types of electronic

12:35:16 issues when it comes to that, which is, we are then put

12:35:22 upon, and there may be some legal issues concerning this.

12:35:24 We are put upon to provide TV Avenue and the platform of

12:35:29 which the public comment is made.

12:35:34 For example, if someone says I wasn't able to get on public

12:35:37 comment on Skype, and you have advertised it, Skype is a way

12:35:40 for me to be a participant and we have a technical problem,

12:35:44 they could rightfully say, you have denied me the

12:35:47 opportunity to be part of the public comment.

12:35:51 I think we open ourselves up to something else that we don't

12:35:54 know about yet.

12:35:55 I mean, that may be a legal issue that we have not provided.

12:35:59 Part of the problem -- and we have seen this with other

12:36:02 politicians where they'll have a town hall meeting where the

12:36:06 questions are recorded or brought in, and then they are

12:36:10 presented to whoever it is.

12:36:12 Are we screening those calls?

12:36:14 Are we screening that access?

12:36:18 We could put ourselves into a lot more thorny legal position

12:36:23 by doing that.

12:36:24 I think that having public comment from all kinds of avenues

12:36:28 is a great idea.

12:36:30 But I do think that there are a lot of things we need to

12:36:32 work out first before we present that.

12:36:34 I agree with Mr. Cohen.

12:36:36 If we are going to talk about it, we need to talk about it

12:36:39 openly and let's figures out what we can do, because I could

12:36:42 ever see some real issues down the pike where we might have

12:36:47 100 people that want to get on board and we have another 100

12:36:51 people here, we are going to be doing public comment for a

12:36:53 long time.

12:36:54 And so -- well, now what?

12:36:58 I have got to say that when you start talking about public

12:37:00 comment and you start advertising it to what you mean by

12:37:04 public comment, it's sort of like in science where, you

12:37:08 know, it will fill in.

12:37:19 I really believe that, especially when it comes to thornier

12:37:22 issues that we have to deal with and it limits the amount of

12:37:25 time that we as a group get a chance to talk and go over

12:37:28 issues.

12:37:29 We want the public input but it's difficult to do everything

12:37:32 else.

12:37:32 Think about all that we have to do now on quasi-judicial.

12:37:39 And I can foresee that there's a lot of people out there of

12:37:42 that have got a lot of ways to communicate with us

12:37:45 electronically.

12:37:46 We just need to look at it very carefully before we go

12:37:49 forward.

12:37:50 That's all I have to say.

12:37:51 Thank you, chair.

12:37:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Ms. Mulhern?

12:37:53 >>MARY MULHERN: It just occurred to be me that we wouldn't

12:37:55 have TPD here with their taser.

12:38:02 Public comments, which -- not appropriate.

12:38:06 I am not even going to weigh in on that H.I am going to stay

12:38:08 out of that discussion.

12:38:09 But I do have to leave because I have to eat.

12:38:16 And we don't need to do anything to make our meetings

12:38:19 longer.

12:38:19 I do think that the presentation this morning, though,

12:38:24 should have been under the workshop agenda, not under

12:38:26 ceremonial.

12:38:27 Because a workshop -- and I also want to tell this council

12:38:32 or remind this council than we used to have special

12:38:36 discussion meetings for some things that weren't necessarily

12:38:43 going to have a quorum, that were things that were not

12:38:46 necessarily going to be legislative or policy, they were

12:38:49 just informational.

12:38:51 So --

12:38:53 >> We have had them and nobody shows up.

12:38:55 >>MARY MULHERN: But I think it would have been personally

12:38:59 fine to have them.

12:38:59 I adopt notch why it's under ceremonial as part of the

12:39:02 workshop.

12:39:04 And I just wanted to say that I am going to hold my motion

12:39:08 about the L.E.D. lights for our next meeting.

12:39:10 I'll make it next week after I have had some time to process

12:39:15 the public comments, and figure out how we can make that

12:39:20 most productive.

12:39:20 >>LISA MONTELIONE: And quickly, it's hilarious to me to

12:39:32 have been say the presentation this morning should have been

12:39:34 on workshop because fish you la at the agenda it's all

12:39:36 scheduled for the 9:00 a.m.

12:39:37 So it's just a word moving, from one place to another, which

12:39:42 is another problem that I have with how we schedule things,

12:39:45 and we talked about this before, how, you know, you have got

12:39:49 six things scheduled for 9 a.m.

12:39:51 It's not physically possible to hear all six at the same

12:39:53 time.

12:39:53 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: If I may at this time go to information

12:39:55 reports and then go back to the public for closing comments

12:39:57 from them, and then we can take up whatever information that

12:40:01 you would like to vote on when we go to information.

12:40:04 Mr. Suarez, any information or new business?

12:40:08 >>MIKE SUAREZ: No.

12:40:11 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Ms. Mulhern?

12:40:12 Mr. Chairman Cohen?

12:40:13 >>HARRY COHEN: Yes, Mr. Chair.

12:40:14 I would like to request City Council to present their

12:40:20 recommendations and analysis at our first budget public

12:40:23 hearing on September 9th at 5:01 p.m.

12:40:26 >> Second.

12:40:27 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Motion by Mr. Cohen.

12:40:28 Second by Mr. Suarez.

12:40:29 All in favor of the motion please indicate by saying aye.

12:40:31 Opposed nay.

12:40:32 The ayes have it unanimously.

12:40:34 Anything else?

12:40:35 >>HARRY COHEN: No thank you.

12:40:37 >>LISA MONTELIONE: No, sir.

12:40:38 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: We go to public comments.

12:40:39 Anyone in the public care to comment?

12:40:43 >> I'm Ed actual Lou from Sulphur Springs.

12:41:07 I had to leave.

12:41:08 But, anyway, I originally came that I thought there would be

12:41:15 something I could swing in my direct examination but there

12:41:17 wasn't.

12:41:17 But that's okay because -- oh, okay, good.

12:41:28 Good.

12:41:29 Transportation was brought up.

12:41:33 And this is about Courtney Campbell that has a walkway for

12:41:39 biking and walking.

12:41:41 So that might be a first step to getting people out of their

12:41:45 cars, which I think Mr. Miranda referred to in a past

12:41:50 meeting.

12:41:52 It's sort of like these cars are part of their body, and

12:41:59 that's what you are working against.

12:42:01 And that was brought up during a discussion of item 3.

12:42:04 Stanford is kind of nice.

12:42:06 I graduated from there.

12:42:08 It's supposed to be the Harvard of the west.

12:42:12 Which I think is putting it down a little bit.

12:42:14 But the thing with Stanford is they have the jargon and the

12:42:20 gobblydegook.

12:42:21 At such point they do break with that and actually start

12:42:24 seeing things.

12:42:25 And the guy's thing about sports is kind of interesting, I

12:42:28 thought.

12:42:28 But in any event, the thing is, a word was there that I hung

12:42:34 on.

12:42:35 The woman brought it up.

12:42:36 It was appropriate technology.

12:42:39 And the person that really started disseminating that term

12:42:43 first was Dr. Eccleberger in civil engineering at USF.

12:42:53 And that meeting on Thursday, I think, last week, the

12:42:57 brochures that went out on it are a little bit confusing.

12:43:00 It seemed like it was just going to be a meeting of people

12:43:03 to talk among themselves like a board, a council or

12:43:07 something.

12:43:07 It didn't seem lake it wags a public thing.

12:43:09 Sole I missed it.

12:43:11 But what's called for is those railroad tracks, the trail

12:43:16 leads back to Jacksonville, and the program I want to enlist

12:43:20 in the NBA program is transportation, logistics and it's

12:43:26 very close to CSX, multiple diesel units on those tracks

12:43:30 would make people from north Tampa and USF could be downtown

12:43:37 Tampa in 15 minutes.

12:43:39 Metro rapid seems to work halfway decently.

12:43:46 The stops are bathed in sunlight in the morning on one side

12:43:49 of the street and nature on the other side so there's a need

12:43:52 for Mediterranean, not palm trees.

12:43:54 Something that has some shade.

12:43:58 So, anyway, I would keep working on that.

12:44:01 But, anyway, this is enough for now.

12:44:04 I got my three minutes.

12:44:05 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you very much.

12:44:06 >> Motion to receive and file.

12:44:09 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Motion to receive and file by the Mr.

12:44:10 Cohen.

12:44:11 Seconded by Mr. Suarez.

12:44:15 All in favor of the motion please indicate by saying aye.

12:44:17 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'm sorry to interrupt.

12:44:24 So the record is clear council member Mulhern's motion

12:44:28 regarding the L.E.D.s was redesigned and accepted by

12:44:31 unanimous consent, to be reintroduced at a later date.

12:44:35 Number one.

12:44:36 The second thing is I am going to ask council to direct me

12:44:38 to bring back minor changes to reflect the changes of

12:44:43 Florida statute.

12:44:44 >> So moved.

12:44:46 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Motion by Mr. Suarez.

12:44:47 Second by Mr. Cohen.

12:44:48 All in favor of the motion? Opposed?

12:44:49 The ayes have it unanimously.

12:44:51 In addition else to come before this council?

12:44:53 We stand adjourned.



This file represents an unedited version of realtime
captioning which should neither be relied upon for complete
accuracy nor used as a verbatim transcript.
The original of this file was produced in all capital
letters and any variation thereto may be a result of third
party edits and software compatibility issues.
Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the
proceedings may need to hire a court reporter.