Help & information    View the list of Transcripts

Tampa City Council

Thursday, June 1, 2006

The following represents an unedited version of
realtime captioning which should neither be relied
upon for complete accuracy nor used as a verbatim
The original of this transcript was produced in all
capital letters and any variation thereto may be a
result of third party edits and software compatibility
Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the
proceedings may need to hire a court reporter.

[Sounding gavel]
09:05:23 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Dingfelder, are you ready?
09:05:26 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Always ready.
09:05:28 >>GWEN MILLER: Tampa City Council is called to order.
09:05:53 The chair will yield to Mr. John Dingfelder.
09:05:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Thank you, Madam Chair.
09:05:58 Good morning.
09:05:59 It is my pleasure and honor to introduce Reverend Lee
09:06:02 Stitzer who will join us at the podium.

09:06:08 He has been the pastor of Holy Trinity Lutheran church
09:06:11 on El Prado Boulevard since 2000.
09:06:15 He served a congregation in Buffalo, New York since
09:06:18 1991.
09:06:19 He also served the community in upstate New York as a
09:06:22 volunteer fireman for 18 years.
09:06:24 Maybe you can come on board with our fire department
09:06:26 and help us as well.
09:06:28 And he's also a member of the U.S. Army reserves,
09:06:30 retired as a first sergeant in 1992.
09:06:33 Reverend Stitzer, it's an honor to have you here to
09:06:40 lead us in the invocation and followed by the pledge
09:06:45 of allegiance.
09:06:47 >> Almighty God, holy Father, we pray for the nations
09:06:54 of peoples of the earth in any place who suffer the
09:06:57 horror of war in any form or degree.
09:07:00 Bring your healing grace and peace upon this planet.
09:07:04 Bind the wounds and heal all the divisions of mankind.
09:07:08 We pray for the many organizations of community
09:07:10 service and ask your blessing on them, the hospitals,
09:07:13 schools, social service agencies, the courts, the
09:07:16 police departments, the fire department, the

09:07:19 sanitation department, all organizations and agencies
09:07:23 seeking to serve mankind.
09:07:24 May they not lack in dedicated workers who perform
09:07:29 their tasks adequately.
09:07:30 For all professions, trades and laborers, we give
09:07:33 thanks and request your blessings upon them.
09:07:37 In the community in which we live thrive under your
09:07:40 blessings.
09:07:41 Give our mayor the will and wisdom to use her office
09:07:45 for the upbuilding of our city and not nor party or
09:07:51 self-interest groups, grant men and women vision and
09:07:54 integrity in the affairs of Tampa city.
09:08:00 So fairness, justice, equity and pros expert can
09:08:03 flourish.
09:08:04 And finally, for this honorable council assembled here
09:08:07 this morning, we especially pray for your good
09:08:10 judgment and the attitude of leaders to be placed in
09:08:14 their hearts, that they accomplish their tasks wisely,
09:08:17 as good stewards of the positions to which they have
09:08:20 been elected.
09:08:20 Protect them from the sins of corruption and greed so
09:08:24 that they may serve the citizens of Tampa with honor

09:08:26 and most noticeable goals.
09:08:29 May this day be completed for your glory.
09:08:31 Amen.
09:08:33 (Pledge of Allegiance).
09:08:49 >>GWEN MILLER: Roll call.
09:08:51 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Here.
09:08:52 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Here.
09:08:53 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Here.
09:08:54 >>ROSE FERLITA: Here.
09:08:56 >>KEVIN WHITE: Here.
09:08:57 >>GWEN MILLER: Here.
09:08:58 At this time we go again to Mr. John Dingfelder who
09:09:02 will present a commendation.
09:09:18 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I have the whole team gathered
09:09:22 around.
09:09:23 >>ROSE FERLITA: Everybody but Tony Garcia.
09:09:36 >>MARY ALVAREZ: he's working.
09:09:38 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I told him to come in and support
09:09:41 the guy.
09:09:42 Council, here's somebody who doesn't need any
09:09:44 introduction, Bob Hunter.
09:09:46 Bob is, of covers -- of course, a leader of the

09:09:51 Hillsborough County city-county Planning Commission.
09:09:53 He's the Executive Director, of course.
09:09:55 But the reason we are here to honor Bob dab was our
09:09:58 commendation from council is because Bob was just
09:10:02 elected by his peers at the American planning
09:10:04 association as their leader, and I think that's like a
09:10:08 four-year commitment, from what I understand.
09:10:10 What a tremendous honor for Bob, and frankly speaks so
09:10:13 well of our community, and how lucky we are to have
09:10:17 Bob.
09:10:19 One thing that comes to mind as I was driving in this
09:10:22 morning, I was thinking about that I was going to --
09:10:26 it's a roast, you know.
09:10:28 [~Laughter~] but when I first came across Bob and Ray,
09:10:34 I didn't know a thing about planning and I actually
09:10:37 was their lawyer for a big case when I was over at the
09:10:40 county.
09:10:40 And they are such good teachers.
09:10:44 And I don't know if I was a very good student or not.
09:10:47 But we won the case.
09:10:50 But they just know so much about planning.
09:10:52 And not only about where we are today, but these guys

09:10:56 are about long-term planning, where we are going in
09:10:59 the next 20 to 50 years.
09:11:00 And that's what they spend their time day in and day
09:11:03 out doing.
09:11:04 And they do such a great job.
09:11:05 The other thing that came to mind, when I think about
09:11:07 Bob, and his entire team, but especially Bob as their
09:11:13 leader, it's courage.
09:11:14 Bob has the courage of his convictions in terms of
09:11:16 standing up for what he believes is right for this
09:11:19 community, about the long-term interests in our
09:11:21 community.
09:11:21 And I see it, and sometimes very subtly but I know
09:11:28 even if I don't see Bob standing at the podium, I know
09:11:30 he's behind the scenes giving his folks the courage
09:11:34 and the strength to say what's right, regardless of
09:11:37 the political considerations or anything else.
09:11:40 And I'm not going to go into details.
09:11:42 We know what the details are.
09:11:43 But when things happen, like impact fees, raising
09:11:48 impact fees appropriately, which recently happened in
09:11:51 the county, these guys have been pushing for that for

09:11:53 years.
09:11:54 Because they know it's the right thing.
09:11:55 And they are the one whose give the support to make it
09:12:00 happen.
09:12:00 Anyway with, all that said, Bob, we are here about the
09:12:03 APA issue.
09:12:05 Tampa City Council wants to give you this
09:12:06 commendation.
09:12:06 We recognize your as essential to the presidency of
09:12:11 the APA and recognize your election to this
09:12:14 prestigious podge, an organization of 40,000 planners
09:12:17 providing support and leadership and development much
09:12:19 livable, I did versified communities by advocating
09:12:22 excellence in community planning, environmental
09:12:24 priorities, and by promoting education and citizen
09:12:26 empowerment to effect positive change.
09:12:28 Bob Hunter is well qualified to accept this most
09:12:31 important assignment, with over 30 years of planning
09:12:34 and leadership, 20 of which have been spent here as
09:12:37 the Executive Director of the Hillsborough County
09:12:41 city-Planning Commission, our four Lowell governments
09:12:46 including city, county, Temple Terrace, and

09:12:51 unincorporated, 1 million people, 1,000 square miles.
09:12:55 Bob performs his duties in an exemplary manner.
09:12:59 The Tampa City Council recognizes the professionalism
09:13:01 of Robert Hunter and his years of service and wish him
09:13:04 continued success in his new role as the incoming
09:13:06 president of the American planning association.
09:13:10 [~Applause~]
09:13:13 >> Bob Hunter: Thank you.
09:13:21 City Council, I appreciate this.
09:13:27 I really do.
09:13:29 I made a note here that I feel very privileged to have
09:13:32 been elected to the president of the American planning
09:13:36 association.
09:13:38 And I hope to represent them nationally and
09:13:43 internationally as well.
09:13:45 It's an organization as John said, 40,000 members, but
09:13:48 we are also in 43 countries, all over the world.
09:13:52 And we are starting to develop an international
09:13:57 presence.
09:13:57 I see that as excitement only from the standpoint of
09:14:00 the opportunity to bring what's happening
09:14:02 internationally to our city and county.

09:14:04 And I look forward to the opportunity to be bringing
09:14:07 to you.
09:14:08 I hope dozens of slide shows but it won't be during
09:14:13 the City Council meeting.
09:14:15 One additional comment.
09:14:16 And staff surprised me by coming over.
09:14:21 Your long-range planning staff appreciates, and you
09:14:25 don't know how much, your responsiveness to our plans.
09:14:28 That's not just to accept what we're saying to you,
09:14:30 but to raise questions, to discuss, and finally come
09:14:33 to your own conclusions about it.
09:14:36 But it is truly rewarding to see a governmental body
09:14:39 that is so involved in the long-range issues.
09:14:45 And we truly appreciate that.
09:14:47 Thank you very much.
09:14:50 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Bob, it was a pleasure when I was
09:14:55 elected to your board, or appointed to your board a
09:14:58 number of years ago, and I had the honor, and I
09:15:04 respected you so much for that, and I still respect
09:15:06 you and your colleagues.
09:15:07 I think my first meeting with Terry Cullen was quite
09:15:13 an experience, because I certainly didn't know

09:15:16 anything about planning and zoning or all the elements
09:15:20 that we had to learn.
09:15:21 And I really appreciated all the patience that you all
09:15:26 had with me, and this APA couldn't have picked a
09:15:31 better successor.
09:15:32 And we wish you the very, very best.
09:15:35 And you're doing a great job.
09:15:39 Your staff and everybody is just so patient with us.
09:15:46 As we go through our management and planning, and what
09:15:55 we have to do.
09:15:56 We are just so happy that you became the leader of
09:15:58 this huge organization.
09:16:00 And I go forward -- now go forward and do your stuff.
09:16:06 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I echo the thoughts of my
09:16:08 colleagues.
09:16:10 Congratulations for what you have created here for our
09:16:12 community.
09:16:14 Your organization is one of the forces for thoughtful
09:16:19 growth as we go forward.
09:16:20 And who needs it more than Florida and a town like
09:16:24 Tampa where we are growing so rapidly and we need to
09:16:26 do it carefully.

09:16:27 What you have created here then can be shared on the
09:16:31 national level.
09:16:31 Congratulations personally.
09:16:33 And thank you for the sort of reflective glory that
09:16:36 you bring our community by your becoming president of
09:16:39 the APA.
09:16:40 And hopefully it will make us pay more attention.
09:16:46 Thank you so much for your work in our community and
09:16:48 congratulations.
09:16:50 >>> thank you for your comments.
09:16:51 I appreciate it.
09:16:53 >>ROSE FERLITA: And this is going to be one of the
09:16:55 teams that I am less long winded than some of my
09:16:58 colleagues, Bob.
09:16:59 That is not because I but from time to time I have
09:17:05 asked you to meet with me and you have.
09:17:10 But it's because in those meetings, I have certainly
09:17:14 benefited from the experience and the knowledge that
09:17:17 you have and you are always very forthcoming that
09:17:19 anything I need.
09:17:20 So lie forward to continuing that relationship, the
09:17:23 acknowledgment that you received from your colleagues

09:17:25 and your peers, obviously indicative of what they
09:17:28 think, the respect from your colleagues, that need
09:17:33 this type of acknowledgment.
09:17:35 Again, congratulations from us.
09:17:37 Thanks to what you do, for what you do, and thanks for
09:17:40 such an incredible staff that follows your lead.
09:17:42 >>> I appreciate your comment.
09:17:44 >>GWEN MILLER: They have said everything.
09:17:47 Don't need to say it over and over again.
09:17:49 Congratulations to you.
09:17:49 And I know you are going to do an excellent job.
09:17:53 Nobody can do it better than you.
09:17:55 I'm glad they chose you.
09:17:57 >>> Thank you.
09:17:58 [~Applause~]
09:18:04 >>GWEN MILLER: We are going to go to item number 5 at
09:18:28 9:15.
09:18:30 I know Gloria mills is not here but someone here is
09:18:36 representing her.
09:18:37 So would you please come up?
09:18:52 >>> Loren Scheiver for paratransit for Hartline. Many
09:18:58 of you are familiar with service on Hartline board and

09:19:02 advocates for transportation in our community and that
09:19:05 is very much appreciated.
09:19:07 We are here today.
09:19:07 I'm with Arizona Jenkins who many of you know as well
09:19:11 as an advocate for people with disability in our
09:19:14 community who focus a lot of this time on
09:19:17 transportation issues.
09:19:18 And we really need him and all of his dedication to
09:19:22 this very important I shall knew our community.
09:19:23 What we have come to talk to you about today is the
09:19:26 creation of an ADA traffic force.
09:19:29 This task force was create it under Hartline's chair
09:19:32 and comprised of members of the city, county, Hartline
09:19:36 staff, transit, transit promoters and advocacy groups
09:19:42 who are looking to improve transportation options in
09:19:44 our community.
09:19:45 Part of what the task is of the task force is develop
09:19:48 a strategy for Hartline to improve accessibility and
09:19:53 review service for people with disabilities and all
09:19:56 citizens in our community.
09:19:58 While we are -- why we are here today is these
09:20:02 transcend to all of our jurisdictions.

09:20:04 Accessibility is something that the community has to
09:20:06 adopt as a whole.
09:20:07 It can't be any one entity that will make it happen.
09:20:10 So inclusion, which is all of our goals, is something
09:20:12 that we'll have to work together to do.
09:20:15 I have given you a copy of those recommendations that
09:20:17 were adopted by Hart's board.
09:20:19 They are there for your review along with some
09:20:21 information that's statistical about what kind of
09:20:25 infrastructure is already in place at some of the bus
09:20:27 stops.
09:20:28 What we'd like from you is the adoption of these
09:20:31 recommendations and a continued coordination effort
09:20:35 between city employees and right-of-way, and public
09:20:41 works so we can continue to work together to not just
09:20:44 improve accessibility at bus stops but improve
09:20:46 accessibility to the destinations beyond.
09:20:48 Because we all know that people are not trying to get
09:20:51 to a bus stop.
09:20:53 That's just a gateway to the destination they are
09:20:56 really trying to do get to which might be church,
09:20:58 might be home, might be school.

09:20:59 All of the things that we all enjoy living here in
09:21:02 Tampa Bay.
09:21:06 So if could you look at those and see how we can work
09:21:09 together to accomplish some of these goals, that's why
09:21:11 we are here today.
09:21:12 I am going to let Arizona speak for a moment about
09:21:16 some of the things that we are working on together.
09:21:26 >> Arizona: The ADA task force, and work together
09:21:33 with the city, and I want to say thank you for all the
09:21:38 work that you already did.
09:21:41 But we want to continue on doing that.
09:21:44 And we work together for all people who ride the bus.
09:21:51 Not only people with disabilities, but, and all the
09:22:05 agencies.
09:22:07 If we can't ride, we need to get others all over town.
09:22:31 Go to church, go to the mall or store.
09:22:47 We take the bus.
09:22:51 And we should work together to make Hartline, to make
09:23:03 the bus accessible to all of us.
09:23:11 Thank you.
09:23:12 >> I would like to close by saying all the
09:23:17 recommendations, Hart has initiated a plan to work on

09:23:20 each of those so there are already steps being taken
09:23:22 to achieve these goals.
09:23:23 We know they are long-term goals, accessibility and
09:23:26 sidewalks and infrastructure is an immense project.
09:23:30 I also want to thank the city staff who has come to
09:23:34 our meetings, Jan Washington has been instrumental in
09:23:36 coming to our meetings and allowing us to see from the
09:23:38 city's perspective on sidewalk improvement programs
09:23:41 and different types of accessibility projects that are
09:23:45 already in the works.
09:23:45 That's the kind of coordination we're looking for.
09:23:48 And also your consideration on shelter advertising so
09:23:53 we can put more transit amenities out for passengers,
09:23:56 again not just for passengers with disabilities but
09:23:58 living here in Florida in the harsh weather that we
09:24:01 live in.
09:24:01 Those kind of transit amenities make the service more
09:24:04 usable for everyone.
09:24:05 We appreciate your consideration today.
09:24:06 And thank you very much.
09:24:09 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you.
09:24:13 When I looked over this list, my reaction was, I

09:24:17 believe we are doing all of this.
09:24:19 And it's my understanding -- I'm chairman of the
09:24:23 livable roadways and we have had presentations from
09:24:28 both the city and the county on what we are doing in
09:24:31 terms of sidewalks and one of the keys to sidewalks is
09:24:33 connecting to the bus stops.
09:24:34 I really thought we already had the staff integration
09:24:38 that you're advocating, and I need you to either
09:24:42 reassure me or tell me we need to do more.
09:24:45 >> I will reassure you, we do have that coordination
09:24:47 at this point.
09:24:48 And it's fairly knew as far as Hartline coordinating
09:24:51 with these jurisdictions, and the staff has been more
09:24:54 than willing to do that.
09:24:56 We are here today -- and actually we are here in front
09:24:58 of you today after the fact in some ways, where we
09:25:01 have already achieved some of the goals that are on
09:25:03 there. But we wanted to have the opportunity to
09:25:05 personally, A, tell you what those goals were, and
09:25:09 then share with you some of the successes that have
09:25:11 already come about, and encourage that continued
09:25:14 coordination as we move forward.

09:25:16 There are many areas that, due to development, may not
09:25:19 have had infrastructure put in at the time the
09:25:23 development occurred.
09:25:23 Those are areas that need our attention, not just
09:25:26 Hartline or the county's or the city's but ours is a
09:25:30 coordinated effort, going back to areas that may not
09:25:33 have had this kind of infrastructure placed at the
09:25:35 time of the development, and may become very critical
09:25:39 to our traveling passengers, not just those using the
09:25:42 bus but those that are walking, riding bikes, pushing
09:25:44 a baby stroller, all those things that create our
09:25:47 inclusive community that we are all working for.
09:25:50 So, yes, it's very encouraging news that we are doing.
09:25:53 This we are moving forward on it.
09:25:54 But I want to make sure that we continue this as we
09:25:57 move forward in new developments, we have talked about
09:26:00 how this community is growing, we are going to have to
09:26:02 make this kind of coordination definitely a part of
09:26:04 how we move forward.
09:26:08 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Thank you for coming this morning.
09:26:11 This is very informative.
09:26:13 My question was, are most of the buses ADA approved?

09:26:18 Or are there some that don't have it?
09:26:21 >>> All the vehicles are 100% ADA compliant.
09:26:24 They all have wheelchair lifts and all of our vans
09:26:27 that provide service as well.
09:26:29 What we are working towards now is bus stops, and not
09:26:32 just the bus stops but the accessibility, the
09:26:34 pedestrian access from the bus stop to the trip
09:26:37 generator which might be a hospital or store, or
09:26:40 wherever the person wants to go.
09:26:41 We are trying to heighten our awareness of not just
09:26:44 the stop, but where the person is trying to travel.
09:26:47 And it could be a person that has a bike on the bus,
09:26:50 who needs to get to a location.
09:26:52 It could be a person in a wheelchair or it could be a
09:26:54 person that is elderly and just needs that kind of
09:26:58 connectivity.
09:26:59 That's what we are trying to concentrate on with this
09:27:01 effort.
09:27:02 The bus stops, but then the points beyond where people
09:27:07 really want to get to.
09:27:08 >> The bus stops, you already have, or you are going
09:27:10 to put in, are they going to be ADA accessible, too?

09:27:14 Or how does that work?
09:27:17 Are they going to have different pads, different type
09:27:21 pads for the wheelchair accessibility?
09:27:25 How does that work?
09:27:26 >>> Correct.
09:27:27 What we are working on now in the first recommendation
09:27:29 you see here is the bus stop review of all the bus
09:27:32 stops.
09:27:32 There's about 4500 bus stops in the system.
09:27:35 So you can imagine this is an expansive project to go
09:27:38 and review each one of them for ADA compliance, and
09:27:41 usability.
09:27:42 Because ADA compliance is the most important, but also
09:27:45 the functionality of that stop and whether it
09:27:47 functions in the system is important.
09:27:49 So that's the first step of this plan, this action
09:27:52 plan, is to review all stops, collect those that may
09:27:56 not be in compliance, if there are, and to remove
09:27:59 those that aren't a functional part of the system.
09:28:02 And we have already started to initiate a joint
09:28:04 project with the MPO to create this bus stop review.
09:28:08 So these are things that Hart will do in tandem with

09:28:11 the city, the county, and other partners.
09:28:15 We just want you to be aware of this so that staff
09:28:18 coming to you, or your hearing of support needs,
09:28:21 you're aware of what we are trying to work on, on this
09:28:24 coordination.
09:28:24 But that will be the first thing that we accomplish
09:28:26 with this plan, is a bus stop review.
09:28:30 >>GWEN MILLER: Ms. Ferlita?
09:28:31 >>ROSE FERLITA: Madam Chairman, I think it's almost
09:28:33 redundant to say the same thing again.
09:28:35 We are all supportive of what we need to do that. Is
09:28:38 our responsibility.
09:28:39 Absolutely, whatever this council can do, I'm sure we
09:28:41 will collectively do.
09:28:42 But my point is just simply to thank Arizona.
09:28:46 It's difficult for you, sir, to come down here and
09:28:49 express that and we appreciate the commitment you have
09:28:51 made to what we need to do for some of our citizens.
09:28:55 It shouldn't have to be said but certainly let me say
09:28:57 it again, we are certainly committed to doing whatever
09:28:59 we can do to make that accessibility much easier, and
09:29:02 I thank you for being part of this process.

09:29:05 >>> Arizona: Thank you.
09:29:06 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Thank you, Madam Chair.
09:29:10 And I too, Mr. Jenkins, it's hard enough for us who
09:29:14 don't have physical challenges to make it to a bus
09:29:17 stop on time and tray to stick with a schedule like
09:29:19 that.
09:29:21 So we appreciate your involvement here.
09:29:23 Are you all asking the county to pass a similar sort
09:29:26 of resolution to what you are asking here today?
09:29:31 >>> To support these recommendations.
09:29:33 These recommendations, as you see them here, are
09:29:35 directed by Hart or the task force to Hart.
09:29:39 But as I stated, there are a lot of interrelated parts
09:29:42 of these recommendations that we will all have to work
09:29:45 together in order to coordinate.
09:29:46 Hart doesn't own the right-of-way in any of these
09:29:49 situations out on bus stops.
09:29:51 So we have to work with jurisdictions in order to make
09:29:54 sure that the placement of bus stops, that the infra
09:29:59 structure for pedestrian access has been placed or
09:30:01 planned before the bus stop goes in.
09:30:04 That is what we are looking for this group to support,

09:30:06 is that coordination, the ability to work together and
09:30:10 plan out the bus stop service, so that as we move
09:30:13 forward, we plan only stops that are accessible and
09:30:17 have this connectivity and then look back to stops
09:30:19 that are in place and either correct or remove.
09:30:24 >>SHAWN HARRISON: I think that's easy enough to do.
09:30:26 But one of the things, like number 2, you say Hartline
09:30:29 should develop a new stream of funding to prioritize
09:30:32 improvements to bus stops.
09:30:36 I mean, that's a Hartline function.
09:30:39 Are you asking us to endorse that, so that this
09:30:43 council is saying, Hartline, this is what you should
09:30:45 do, you should identify a new revenue stream, sort of
09:30:49 involving ourselves in Hartline funding decisions that
09:30:52 I'm not sure we --
09:30:53 >>> No, sir.
09:30:54 What I'm asking for is that this body adopts a
09:30:59 resolution to support Hart's attempt to achieve these
09:31:03 goals, and that really is a matter of coordinating
09:31:07 with city staff in order to make sure that we are
09:31:10 working interjurisdictionally to achieve those goals.
09:31:15 You're absolutely right.

09:31:16 And Hart is working on this, and this is a Hart
09:31:19 function.
09:31:19 There is the opportunity, though, for other
09:31:21 jurisdictions to look for funding to achieve
09:31:23 pedestrian access as well.
09:31:25 Maybe not at the bus stop but at that line of traffic
09:31:28 or on that roadway in which there isn't any
09:31:31 connectivity at this point.
09:31:33 So changing these goals to fit the city's plan may be
09:31:40 something that's more appropriate.
09:31:41 But all of these goals can be done by all of us in our
09:31:44 own ways and with our own funding stream in order to
09:31:47 achieve that accessibility element.
09:31:50 And probably by giving you these, Hart, it's a bit
09:31:55 confusing.
09:31:56 But what we are really looking for is to heighten
09:31:58 awareness of what we are doing and to also height ten
09:32:01 awareness of the jurisdiction that is can work
09:32:04 together with us.
09:32:08 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Thank you, Madam Chair.
09:32:09 As City Council's representative on Hartline, we
09:32:15 definitely as a board have been wrestling with these

09:32:18 issues for quite awhile.
09:32:19 I'm sure when Linda was on and other folks were on
09:32:22 Hartline these issues are ongoing.
09:32:24 I think that what I've seen is I think a more
09:32:28 aggressive approach to really jumping into these
09:32:32 issues and tackling them, both at the city and the
09:32:35 county level.
09:32:36 And I think it's great.
09:32:37 I'm really glad that Mr. Daignault is here.
09:32:40 And I saw Mr. LaMotte here awhile ago.
09:32:43 There he is in the back.
09:32:44 From our perspective, you know, the coordination is
09:32:47 the most important thing.
09:32:49 We need to find out what the priority list is from
09:32:53 Hart's perspective, because you guys have the numbers,
09:32:56 and you know where the most critical needs are.
09:32:58 And then we need to translate that into our priority
09:33:01 list and make sure that those improvements for the
09:33:03 sidewalks and the other accessibility issues happen.
09:33:05 So I'm glad to hear that Ms. Washington has been
09:33:10 attending these meetings.
09:33:12 I'm sure that will continue.

09:33:13 And we'll get these things done.
09:33:15 >>> Thank you very much for your time this morning.
09:33:16 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank you.
09:33:17 And we will consider the resolution.
09:33:19 We'll work on it and let you know when we are going to
09:33:21 do it.
09:33:25 We need to approve the agenda.
09:33:35 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I wanted to pull item 15 for a few
09:33:37 minutes.
09:33:38 I wanted to hear from purchasing on that.
09:33:41 >>GWEN MILLER: Other items that need to be pulled?
09:33:50 >>THE CLERK: Madam Chairman, we have received --
09:33:53 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I was going to ask also, item 8 is
09:33:55 the impact fee for Ybor City.
09:34:00 It's my understanding from Mr. Smith that he might
09:34:02 want to pull that.
09:34:07 >>GWEN MILLER: We don't have to pull that. We are
09:34:12 going to discuss 8.
09:34:16 Any other item to pull?
09:34:19 >> Move to approve the agenda.
09:34:21 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I believe there is a wish to move
09:34:27 number 5 about the impact fee to join with number 46

09:34:30 at the end of the meeting because that also deals with
09:34:32 school concurrency.
09:34:34 I don't know whether council wishes to address those
09:34:36 items together.
09:34:37 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Yes.
09:34:39 That would be appropriate.
09:34:40 >>GWEN MILLER: Item 46.
09:34:42 Any other?
09:34:45 Need approval.
09:34:46 >> So moved.
09:34:46 >> Second.
09:34:47 (Motion carried).
09:34:49 >> We go to Heather Lamboy.
09:34:55 >>HEATHER LAMBOY: Land development.
09:34:57 I want a clarification for case Z 05-129, scheduled by
09:35:02 the council for July 13th.
09:35:05 This petition came to you last year, and the petition
09:35:10 needs to be amended.
09:35:11 When the council scheduled the hearing date they did
09:35:15 not make a motion to amend the petition to enlarge the
09:35:18 area as the rezoning.
09:35:20 And so staff would like to request the council grant

09:35:26 an amendment to that petition.
09:35:27 >> So moved.
09:35:30 >> Second.
09:35:30 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Do we have a number on that?
09:35:34 >>HEATHER LAMBOY: These are --
09:35:35 >> But it's not on the agenda?
09:35:37 >>GWEN MILLER: No, it's on the agenda for the
09:35:39 13th.
09:35:39 She wants to know what it is.
09:35:42 >>> 1702 West Kennedy Boulevard.
09:35:43 >>MARY ALVAREZ: 1702 west Kennedy.
09:35:46 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion and second.
09:35:48 (Motion carried)
09:35:54 David Smith.
09:36:00 >>DAVID SMITH: City attorney.
09:36:02 Is this where we are going to take up item number 2?
09:36:06 >>GWEN MILLER: Yes.
09:36:06 >>DAVID SMITH: okay.
09:36:08 Then let me provide you a picture as they say that's
09:36:14 worth a thousand words.
09:36:15 And I always like to save a thousand words, my voice
09:36:19 being what it is.

09:36:26 I assume we have that right side up.
09:36:28 Yes, we do.
09:36:29 Let me move that so you can see it.
09:36:31 It's a busy diagram but if you notice the green line
09:36:34 that runs from the left, which is 275 on the west --
09:36:39 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Could you maybe point to it?
09:36:41 >>> Sure, I would be happy to.
09:36:43 Steve is actually doing it.
09:36:44 That circle right there.
09:36:45 Let me move it up a little bit.
09:36:49 The dialogue was blocking it out.
09:36:51 Right there is 275.
09:36:52 That's where this roadway which is called the
09:36:54 east-west road will connect to 275.
09:36:58 You head easterly from there up to where it joins a
09:37:01 dark green line.
09:37:02 And as I explained shortly that dark green line is
09:37:05 what we call the ancillary roadway improvement, that
09:37:08 Marty is providing to you right now the revised
09:37:11 contract, which Joe Utello was kind enough to go up
09:37:17 and get for me.
09:37:19 Thank you, Joe, for your help.

09:37:22 Essentially, what we have is unlike the area in South
09:37:26 Tampa where some of us live and are very familiar, New
09:37:29 Tampa actually has some areas where they can build
09:37:32 roadways to help ease their traffic concerns.
09:37:34 This is one of those roadways and it is a very
09:37:37 important road.
09:37:37 As you can see what it connects -- and if you have
09:37:40 ever been up in that area during the rush hour, early
09:37:43 or late, you will know how awful it is.
09:37:45 And this will help consider considerable numbers of
09:37:48 people avoid some of those quagmires.
09:37:52 The city acquired the right-of-way for that light
09:37:55 green portion of roadway, that's the east-west
09:37:57 roadway, and essentially there's a project that I have
09:38:00 identified estimated to be about a $150 million
09:38:05 project. The problem with that is either us, D.O.T.
09:38:07 nor the turnpike authority have the money to build it.
09:38:11 So what we are doing is we are having an approach that
09:38:15 is new to Florida, that we expect to be replicated
09:38:19 elsewhere in Florida called the 3-key project, a
09:38:22 federal project in which you obtain private funds for
09:38:24 the construction of a roadway that will serve as a

09:38:27 toll road, and the Expressway Authority is the entity
09:38:30 in our area that has that experience and that
09:38:33 expertise.
09:38:34 So what we have before you today is a purchase and
09:38:39 sale agreement in which we intend to sell our
09:38:42 right-of-way to the Expressway Authority for them to
09:38:44 use in this process to obtain a concessionaire who
09:38:50 will bid on an ultimately build that roadway.
09:38:53 It's a somewhat complicated process, and unfortunately
09:38:55 it needs to get moving quickly.
09:38:57 The cost of construction being what it is, it
09:38:59 accelerates dramatically.
09:39:01 I think you have a question already.
09:39:03 >>GWEN MILLER: No, we are going to wait till you
09:39:05 finish your presentation.
09:39:08 >> So what the Expressway Authority will do if we
09:39:10 enter into this contract is they will start an RFP
09:39:14 process.
09:39:14 They will seek to find a concessionaire hole build
09:39:17 this road and will manage it.
09:39:21 The submittals are fairly costly process.
09:39:25 So in order to make sure people literally will be

09:39:29 bidding on a project that will have the ability to be
09:39:33 consummated, meaning they'll have our road
09:39:36 right-of-way to use, we need to enter into a contract
09:39:38 that provides that comfort so these people will spend
09:39:41 the money up front for the engineering and the
09:39:43 consultants, et cetera, to prepare a response to that
09:39:46 RFP.
09:39:47 That could be several hundred thousand dollars in
09:39:51 itself.
09:39:51 That's why we are proceeding in this fashion.
09:39:53 It's why ware not coming to you with a proposal.
09:39:55 We are doing this in order to generate the proposals.
09:39:59 Essentially the purchase price is $4 million.
09:40:02 And that's approximately what we have in the
09:40:04 acquisition of the rights-of-way.
09:40:05 The city is getting reimbursed for all the costs they
09:40:07 have incurred.
09:40:12 We do want to get a lively concourse of bidders.
09:40:16 Because the project is thin which means the margins
09:40:20 are very tight, we want to work with the expressway
09:40:23 authority to assist in considerations.
09:40:26 You will note in your purchase contract in front of

09:40:29 you if they simply take the direct approach and build
09:40:31 the roadway and we build the dark green portion, they
09:40:34 will pay the purchase price over time.
09:40:37 And that's because we want to work with them to allow
09:40:40 them to attract bidders and a million 750 up front.
09:40:50 You will note in the contract it's like 150,000 a year
09:40:53 for the next five years and then 550,000 a year for
09:40:55 the next five that. Adds up to $5,000,250, which is a
09:41:01 present value of 4 million in today's dollars with the
09:41:03 discount rate.
09:41:06 Obviously I had help on that one.
09:41:09 The authority intends to start advertising
09:41:12 immediately.
09:41:12 And that's why when I told you last week we would
09:41:16 rather only postpone it a week if we could, my
09:41:24 presentation this morning was prepared about 3:30 this
09:41:26 morning so I was coherent.
09:41:40 You have a complete understanding -- why would someone
09:41:46 bid on this project if it's so thin?
09:41:48 I think it's important for you to understand that
09:41:49 because it's one of the reasons that causes us to move
09:41:54 forward. This is the first project of its kind in

09:41:57 Florida. This is a small project in comparison.
09:42:00 Others have been done in Illinois and elsewhere are
09:42:03 multi-billion dollar projects.
09:42:05 150 million is a lot of money for us but maybe not
09:42:07 necessarily for some people in the world.
09:42:09 And so people who have been on this are quite likely
09:42:11 to be from anywhere in the world.
09:42:13 They will welcome to have a presence in Florida.
09:42:16 It is highly likely that Florida will have other
09:42:18 projects like this, and being the first one in the
09:42:21 state is a decided advantage.
09:42:22 Part of the reason for moving rapidly.
09:42:27 One of the things we did when we acquired the
09:42:30 right-of-way is we encouraged contractual obligations.
09:42:33 What we have done in this contract is we have the
09:42:35 authority and or the concessionaire, the ultimate
09:42:38 bidder, assuming those obligations on our behalf and
09:42:42 indemnifying us for that.
09:42:46 So we have anticipated those kind of considerations.
09:42:48 There is an indemnification agreement in conjunction
09:42:52 with closing and there are other documents that will
09:42:54 be prepared and executed in conjunction with closing.

09:42:56 We are going to do what we need to do to protect the
09:43:01 city and its interest.
09:43:04 They will indemnify us against those and we will seek
09:43:09 to be released.
09:43:11 As some of you may realize being released comes from
09:43:16 the parties to whom we have the obligation whereas an
09:43:19 indemnification is a third party.
09:43:21 We would like to get as much protection as possible.
09:43:23 Please feel comfortable that we have prepared this
09:43:26 document in that fashion.
09:43:28 The complication that we had, except possibly in
09:43:33 Atlanta, no one wants to build a road to nowhere.
09:43:37 As you can see from the drawing, the connection over
09:43:40 I-75 on east is extremely important.
09:43:43 Because that allows this east-west roadway to connect
09:43:46 to what I believe is New Tampa Boulevard.
09:43:49 And I have a little bit of a blow-up on the next page
09:43:53 that will hopefully show you that.
09:43:56 For those of you who may not venture out in that area
09:43:59 as often as some of us do.
09:44:04 Steve, if could you show them where that flyover is,
09:44:11 identified as the ancillary roadway improvements,

09:44:14 ancillary to the east-west road proper.
09:44:17 You can see I think on the east, on the other side of
09:44:19 I-75, is New Tampa Boulevard, so that will connect
09:44:24 ultimately it will connect from 275 on the west all
09:44:28 the way through and over to New Tampa Boulevard.
09:44:32 I hope I have my streets correct.
09:44:35 That caused a little bit of complication because
09:44:37 that's a project the city was going to do.
09:44:41 The problem is, once again we don't have all the funds
09:44:43 for that project.
09:44:44 The projects are variously estimated to cost between
09:44:47 12 and $16 million.
09:44:49 What we have done in the contract before you is we
09:44:52 have allowed the authority, the ability to complete
09:44:55 that project.
09:44:56 Since that's so important to the ability of the
09:44:58 east-west road to work, it makes sense for them to
09:45:01 have the contractual right to complete that.
09:45:04 Not withstanding that we have given ourselves the
09:45:06 right to complete it first.
09:45:07 We have approximately $8 million on hand, if they pay
09:45:12 4 million for our right-of-way that gives us about 12

09:45:14 million.
09:45:14 That puts us a little closer to the numbers we think
09:45:17 we need to complete it, and we would prefer to do it
09:45:20 ourselves.
09:45:20 It will probably go out to bid in July.
09:45:23 That portion of this entire project needs to be built
09:45:27 anyway.
09:45:27 If something happens and we can't build the east-west
09:45:30 roadway or the authority can't get any bidders willing
09:45:32 to come and spend the 150 million for this project, we
09:45:36 have to build that portion.
09:45:37 So it's important for to us try to control it and make
09:45:40 it happen as quickly as possible.
09:45:48 Hopefully I'll answer your question.
09:45:50 >>GWEN MILLER: This is still the presentation.
09:45:54 >>> So what we have done is given ours it is ability
09:45:56 to complete that project as it currently exists but
09:45:59 they have the ability to step in if we don't elect to
09:46:03 do so by a certain time period.
09:46:05 Why would we do that?
09:46:07 We do that because they need to take this into
09:46:09 account, and they also need to take it into account,

09:46:17 what they'll do with the RFP -- and we will
09:46:20 participate, city will be a member on that -- they'll
09:46:22 have to identify the scope of the project.
09:46:25 And anybody bidding on $150 million projects are going
09:46:28 to want to make sure this is done so they will provide
09:46:32 an A and B type of bid.
09:46:34 If we complete it we'll do it.
09:46:35 If not, they will have the ability to do it.
09:46:37 If we elect to do it and then fail to perform, you
09:46:41 typically contemplate these things in the contract,
09:46:43 they will have a right to come in and complete it and
09:46:45 we'll pay them the balance.
09:46:47 We'll apply our 8 million.
09:46:48 We'll apply our 4 million in purchase price.
09:46:51 And we'll pay the additional amount if there is an
09:46:53 additional amount out of impact fees when we receive
09:46:56 them.
09:46:57 That's one of the changes that came last night.
09:46:59 So it's a fairly complicated process but I think you
09:47:03 will see as you walk through it that it makes a lot of
09:47:06 sense.
09:47:08 The last issue is I think the planning, it is

09:47:12 contemplated that we be able to complete this project,
09:47:15 if we do it ourselves, I think by March of 2010, the
09:47:19 authority if they do it and at that time from the
09:47:21 outset probably -- I think the contract contemplates
09:47:25 October 2009.
09:47:27 That will be the fly-over project and the balance of
09:47:30 the east-west road probably by March of 2010.
09:47:34 Those are estimates.
09:47:35 We have in the contract in terms of objectives to
09:47:37 accomplish.
09:47:37 And we are contractually obligated to do so
09:47:42 particularly if it relates to the completion of their
09:47:43 portion.
09:47:44 So I hope I didn't confuse with you that last bit.
09:47:47 That was not entirely clearly presented.
09:47:49 But what we would like to do is we recommend for your
09:47:52 consideration today that you approve this contract,
09:47:56 and as I have indicated there will be additional
09:47:58 documents to be prepared.
09:48:04 We have had a good relationship with the authority.
09:48:06 And we have no difficulty working out the issues that
09:48:08 have arisen.

09:48:10 They have been reasonable requests on their part and
09:48:12 reasonable requests on our part and we have always
09:48:14 come up with a solution we think is fair and makes
09:48:16 sense, and we are very comfortable about the ability
09:48:18 to do that with the easement agreement and the
09:48:21 indemnification agreement.
09:48:22 They are clearly taking a risk as well.
09:48:24 If we don't have a document, but we are very
09:48:28 comfortable that won't be a problem.
09:48:30 We all understand what we are getting into and I think
09:48:32 we are all proceeding in good faith to try to get a
09:48:34 road in the city that we don't know otherwise how we
09:48:38 could possibly build.
09:48:40 If you have any other questions I will be glad to
09:48:41 answer them.
09:48:42 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Mr. Smith, the very first meeting I
09:48:44 went to about this road was an MPO meeting where Mayor
09:48:48 Pam Iorio was pregnant with her first child and we
09:48:51 were discussing and voting.
09:48:58 She voted against it with the sentiments of the
09:49:00 community and I used it -- I have been paying a lot of
09:49:04 attention to this over time.

09:49:06 >>> And that child is graduating from high school.
09:49:09 >> Correct.
09:49:10 And the concern I have is that this is very sensitive
09:49:19 environmental land.
09:49:20 And I want to ensure -- and there's -- and construct
09:49:28 it where you build from the road you have already
09:49:30 built onto the land, so your path of intrusion is less
09:49:37 destructive.
09:49:38 My concern is that as this project is done that the
09:49:43 more expensive but less environmental destructive
09:49:46 construction method is employed.
09:49:48 What assurances do we have that that will be the case?
09:49:53 >>> You do not.
09:49:53 And let me explain what the contract does say in that
09:49:55 regard so you know exactly where you stand.
09:49:57 One of the issues that was of significant concern to
09:49:59 the authority was we had certain things, that wasn't
09:50:03 one of them but we had certain things we wanted to see
09:50:05 happen on a time frame we wanted to have occur.
09:50:07 The problem with a roadway of this size is it is
09:50:11 pretty significant.
09:50:12 The cost attendant to breaking it up in some different

09:50:17 fashion can be hugely significant and may make a
09:50:21 difference between doing the project and not.
09:50:23 We wanted them to complete the flyover first for
09:50:26 reasons that are perhaps selfish to our
09:50:28 considerations.
09:50:29 What we ultimately agreed with in the contract is that
09:50:32 the staging and the processing and the phasing would
09:50:35 be handled in a manner that was consistent with what
09:50:38 their bid process will result in, but that it will be
09:50:42 done by a certain time period.
09:50:44 So we were focusing primarily on completion dates as
09:50:47 opposed to the process that you are referring to.
09:50:51 I can only tell you that there is a very involved
09:50:55 per-meeting requirement for completing this road.
09:50:58 I can't begin to tell you what all is entailed in
09:51:00 that.
09:51:01 But perhaps if you want more information, Steve
09:51:03 Daignault could.
09:51:04 But among other things there is a process, the
09:51:09 national environmental protection act.
09:51:11 So there are going to be significant environmental
09:51:13 considerations and constraints on how this roadway is

09:51:16 built.
09:51:16 So I know that isn't exactly what you had hoped to
09:51:20 hear.
09:51:21 But I want to let you know what we do have in the
09:51:23 contract.
09:51:28 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: So in other words, we the city --
09:51:31 if this happened under our watch, we could ensure that
09:51:35 it was done in an environmentally careful manner.
09:51:39 If we -- we don't have any direct oversight to make
09:51:46 sure that it's done in that way.
09:51:50 >>DAVID SMITH: Correct.
09:51:51 We will not be directing the construction activities.
09:51:53 We will be monitoring them only in terms of making
09:51:56 sure that it's constructed commensurate with the funds
09:51:59 we put into it.
09:52:01 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Linda brings up an interesting
09:52:05 issue.
09:52:05 I don't think it's -- I think it's an issue that is a
09:52:09 little bit premature at this time because I think it's
09:52:12 sort of a business decision that is very important to
09:52:15 that part of our city.
09:52:18 And Mr. Harrison actually pointed that out to us when

09:52:22 we went up in the helicopter and flying around looking
09:52:25 at this area, looking at the traffic, and I remember
09:52:27 him specifically pointing out to the flyover, the
09:52:31 ancillary improvement area, and saying, you know, we
09:52:33 have got to build this bridge over it and it's
09:52:37 important to the families to be able to get their kid
09:52:39 to the two schools that are right there, et cetera,
09:52:42 et cetera.
09:52:42 So I think it's important that we move forward to at
09:52:45 least try and build this road and build the flyover.
09:52:49 However, that's not to say the environmental issues
09:52:50 aren't important.
09:52:51 The expressway authority Executive Director is here.
09:52:54 And I would like him to give us his assurances that
09:52:59 under their authority that they would be as concerned
09:53:03 busy these environmental issues as the city would be.
09:53:07 I also do believe that under the NEPA, which is the
09:53:11 federal program with the environmental impact
09:53:13 statements and everything else that's involved,
09:53:15 there's a lot of opportunity for public input, public
09:53:19 involvement, and frankly for lawsuits, if Sierra clubs
09:53:24 and those types of organizations don't think it's

09:53:26 being built appropriately they can inject themselves
09:53:29 and sue and stop projects and things like that.
09:53:31 So there are those federal opportunities.
09:53:35 That's a statement.
09:53:38 On the flyover, David, if we decide to build it, up
09:53:42 front, because it needs to get built as quickly as
09:53:48 possible, is it legally possible for us to then turn
09:53:51 around and take what we have done and sell it to
09:53:56 whoever is building the other part, or lease to the
09:53:58 them, long-term lease to the them so they can operate
09:54:00 it and maintain it as part of their toll road?
09:54:04 >>DAVID SMITH: Good question.
09:54:05 Let me -- the contract really contemplates that they
09:54:09 want to have the maintenance and repair obligations
09:54:11 for the east-west portion of the roadway.
09:54:13 We will have the repair and operation and maintenance
09:54:16 obligation for the flyover.
09:54:18 So we will retain that control because we want it to.
09:54:20 We wanted to make sure we keep it at a level that
09:54:24 meets the needs of our citizens.
09:54:26 So we will retain that ability.
09:54:29 And one of the things we are -- I think the logical

09:54:32 question that would occur is we are maintaining a road
09:54:35 someone else is going to build.
09:54:36 We address that I shall knew terms of the plans and
09:54:38 specks.
09:54:39 We don't take over maintenance until they build it in
09:54:43 compliance with the plans and specs.
09:54:46 I wanted that addressed.
09:54:48 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: It's obvious is somebody is going
09:54:52 to build this they are going to put a toll booth
09:54:55 somewhere in the section.
09:54:56 Would people be able to go over the bridge without
09:54:58 paying the toll, and then go over to the interstate?
09:55:04 >>> Correct.
09:55:04 The bridge portion will not be tolled.
09:55:07 Will not have a toll.
09:55:09 >> Okay.
09:55:11 Would you care to come up and address those
09:55:14 environmental concerns?
09:55:16 >>> Thank you very much.
09:55:17 I'm pleased to be here today.
09:55:18 We worked very hard to get to this point.
09:55:21 One factor --

09:55:22 >>GWEN MILLER: Put your name on the record please.
09:55:26 >>> Ralph Mervin, Tampa Expressway Authority.
09:55:32 These are not your additional contracts that we are so
09:55:35 used to put out to bid and people do the low priced
09:55:38 bidding and so forth.
09:55:39 These are long-term relationships.
09:55:42 And the company that we deal with is not the
09:55:45 construction company.
09:55:46 It's the concessionaire.
09:55:48 And that concessionaire on this project, this
09:55:51 relationship will run in excess of 40 years.
09:55:54 It will take to make this actually happen.
09:55:57 These companies are looking for relationship in our
09:56:00 community.
09:56:01 They want good relations with the community.
09:56:04 They want to build a customer base up there.
09:56:07 The people that we are talking about that are
09:56:09 particularly concerned in that area are the potential
09:56:11 customers.
09:56:12 So when you are delivering something new, it's a
09:56:15 business.
09:56:16 So these folks, in their proposals, when they present,

09:56:20 they are aware of environmental concerns.
09:56:22 And they are trying to address those kinds of
09:56:24 concerns, that not only the evaluators will be looking
09:56:29 at in the proposals but they know the community will
09:56:31 be concerned about as well.
09:56:32 So it's not as bad as a typical put something out to
09:56:37 bid, you get a construction, you take the low bid and
09:56:40 you kind of get out of their way.
09:56:44 In this type of relationship we have an opportunity to
09:56:46 evaluate these proposals, their environmental
09:56:49 considerations are part of this.
09:56:51 The city will be part of that team that evaluates the
09:56:54 proposer that is selected.
09:56:56 And they will be part of the negotiation as we move
09:56:59 through finalizing the agreement with that proposer
09:57:02 and that concession, who in turn has a contractor to
09:57:06 actually do the work.
09:57:07 So I have a lot of hope and faith and belief that they
09:57:12 will come forward in a very sensible and responsible
09:57:16 manner and present a program that's acceptable to all
09:57:19 of us.
09:57:26 >>ROSE FERLITA: Just a comment back to you, and I

09:57:28 certainly appreciate your concerns about the
09:57:30 environment.
09:57:32 This is at least partially reassuring.
09:57:34 If you remember, it's been so long and you remember
09:57:36 better than the rest of us because you have been here.
09:57:38 But when we talked -- I know I did and I don't know
09:57:42 about my other colleagues on the council Tet -- had
09:57:46 some meetings.
09:57:47 We were looking at configuration A, B, et cetera,
09:57:50 et cetera.
09:57:50 So at least we have that in place.
09:57:52 But the configuration we picked was the one that was
09:57:55 the lesser of the two or the three environmentally
09:57:58 imposing.
09:57:58 So that part is at least -- we have protected it in
09:58:03 that sense, somewhat.
09:58:05 We had meetings with neighbors and about the impact on
09:58:12 the environment.
09:58:14 >>> And we have more information in talking with
09:58:16 Steve.
09:58:16 The planning development engineering as well as
09:58:23 interchanged injunction report requires compliance for

09:58:26 the need for process, which requires that you consider
09:58:29 all alternative means of construction.
09:58:32 And you are to favor that which is least intrusive.
09:58:35 Among other things, we have an identified corridor
09:58:38 that we will stay within.
09:58:39 So it's my understanding -- and I am not the
09:58:43 engineer -- this will be built in a very environmental
09:58:46 and friendly manner.
09:58:49 >>ROSE FERLITA: I just had one other thing, too, I
09:58:51 very briefly spoke outside, David with, Mr. Mechanik
09:58:54 and Mr. Urette, and I think because this issue is so
09:58:59 sensitive and been going on for quite a long time, I
09:59:01 wonder if our chairman might consider allowing him to
09:59:05 come up.
09:59:07 And I don't know if you guys want to do that, but I
09:59:10 thought I would afford you that opportunity.
09:59:15 >>> I'm the managing partner for the Tampa Palms
09:59:18 professional center, which is a half million square
09:59:20 foot professional hotel, commercial retail, and
09:59:25 potentially cultural arts center.
09:59:28 And collection of Tampa Palms that is basically
09:59:32 adjacent to this flyover, and east-west expressway.

09:59:39 So we are very familiar with both the situation both
09:59:46 proposed and current in the area, the desires of the
09:59:50 community as far as traffic concerns, just an
09:59:55 interesting tid-bit.
09:59:56 What we are currently seeing with the development
09:59:57 which is under construction being occupied, some 90%
10:00:04 of the people are local that is are moving from other
10:00:06 parts of town, because of road problems.
10:00:10 Basically, tired of the commute, Bruce B. Downs is
10:00:14 driving them nuts.
10:00:16 So there is tremendous congestion out there.
10:00:21 I see it every morning, fighting interstate 75, Bruce
10:00:26 B. Downs interchange.
10:00:29 That's a sad thing to see.
10:00:32 We are eagerly anticipating the completion of the
10:00:35 flyover.
10:00:36 We are very encouraged to see the efforts that the
10:00:40 city is making to find funding sources for the
10:00:43 east-west expressway.
10:00:46 Our biggest concern is the delays that have been
10:00:49 happening.
10:00:52 Mrs. Saul-Sena mentioned that 16, 17 years since this

10:00:57 was first discussed.
10:01:01 We would like to see it done sooner than later,
10:01:04 ideally would like some sort of assurance would be
10:01:08 great.
10:01:08 But encouraging that the city is trying to put some
10:01:13 time limits on this to get the project done.
10:01:15 I just want to basically strengthen the comment that
10:01:21 we have heard.
10:01:22 There is currently only one east-west corridor in New
10:01:25 Tampa and that's Bruce B. Downs.
10:01:28 And it's basically a parking lot if you go out there.
10:01:31 So this project is greatly needed.
10:01:33 Anything that can be done to speed it up and to give
10:01:35 the community some assurance that it will be completed
10:01:37 will be greatly appreciated.
10:01:39 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank you.
10:01:42 >>ROSE FERLITA: Mr. Urette, thanks.
10:01:45 And I didn't mean to slight anybody else in the
10:01:47 audience, Madam Chairman, if anyone else wanted to
10:01:49 speak out, these two gentlemen and anybody else.
10:01:53 >>GWEN MILLER: Did you want to say something,
10:01:55 Mr. Mechanik?

10:01:56 Or are you just here to support?
10:01:59 >>ROSE FERLITA: Mr. Anderson, did you want to say
10:02:01 something?
10:02:03 >> Mr. Harrison.
10:02:03 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Thank you, Madam Chair.
10:02:06 I believe that what we are seeing here is the wave of
10:02:10 the future for building roads in the State of Florida.
10:02:14 As we all know, the price of construction of any sort
10:02:17 of project has gone up dramatically over the past
10:02:20 couple of years, and that certain applies to roads.
10:02:25 And I think we will very shortly find ourselves out of
10:02:29 the business of building roads in government.
10:02:32 I don't think that FDOT, I don't think that counties
10:02:35 or cities, are going to be able to afford to build
10:02:38 roads anymore.
10:02:39 And the private sector is willing to do this.
10:02:42 And they are willing to use this one as a test case.
10:02:45 And I think it's an exciting project.
10:02:50 I'm honored to have it in my district.
10:02:51 I'm honored to have this project to be the first one
10:02:55 of its kind in the State of Florida.
10:02:57 And hopefully we'll do it right.

10:03:02 Ms. Saul-Sena, you had mentioned the environmental
10:03:04 aspects of this.
10:03:05 And if you all will recall, when we initially started
10:03:08 looking at this project, the numbers to build it were
10:03:11 really in the 30 to $50 million range.
10:03:14 And it's $150 million now.
10:03:18 And that's not just because the price of construction
10:03:21 has gone up.
10:03:22 That's what because what we have done in the
10:03:25 environmental community is to build a 3-mile bridge
10:03:27 from start to finish rather than going out and putting
10:03:29 blacktop down in a very, very environmentally
10:03:32 sensitive area, in a beautiful part of town, we are
10:03:35 building a bridge.
10:03:36 We are building this so that we do protect the
10:03:39 environment as much as possible.
10:03:41 And that has caused this project to go up tremendously
10:03:46 in price.
10:03:47 So I believe that we are doing everything humanly
10:03:51 possible to make this project work, and in an
10:03:53 environmentally sensitive way.
10:03:55 And if you will note, I don't think there's anyone

10:03:58 from the environmental community here in opposition to
10:04:00 this.
10:04:01 And had we been holding this meeting five years ago,
10:04:03 this room would have been packed with people in
10:04:06 opposition.
10:04:07 We have done Yeomans work over the last several years
10:04:10 in bringing all the parties together to try to get
10:04:13 this to happen.
10:04:14 And we started talking to D.O.T. a couple of years ago
10:04:16 about this.
10:04:17 And the enterprise originally was going to do this.
10:04:24 You all will recall we thought the turnpike enterprise
10:04:27 was going to do it and they ultimately decided they
10:04:29 weren't.
10:04:29 So the expressway authority stepped in.
10:04:31 And I just want to say on a personal level, thank you
10:04:35 to the expressway authority for taking this project
10:04:38 over, for moving it forward.
10:04:40 I firmly believe that without Ralph Mervin and Steve
10:04:43 Anderson right now, this project would not be still on
10:04:46 the books.
10:04:47 So I think that we are at a great moment of

10:04:52 opportunity now for the City of Tampa, and
10:04:55 Hillsborough County and the State of Florida, to take
10:04:58 a project like this that's never been done in our
10:05:00 state, and to make it a reality right here in New
10:05:02 Tampa.
10:05:04 There's a couple of things that I want to put on the
10:05:06 record, David, or Ralph.
10:05:07 I want you all to hear this.
10:05:10 We made a commitment to the folks that are going to be
10:05:12 most directly impacted by this, that this project
10:05:17 would be as little disturbing to them as possible.
10:05:23 One of the things that I think the mayor and I are
10:05:25 both on the same page on is sound attenuation.
10:05:30 As this project nears several homes, you can see down
10:05:34 here on the very bottom there are some homes that this
10:05:38 thing will sit almost up against their back yards --
10:05:41 they are going to be impacted severely by not only the
10:05:45 construction but the sound of the traffic as the road
10:05:47 is built and operates.
10:05:48 So I want to make sure when we go out, or when the
10:05:52 expressway authority goes out to bid, that we are
10:05:54 addressing this T concerns of those neighbors down

10:05:57 there.
10:06:00 We made that commitment and we need to follow through
10:06:03 with that commitment.
10:06:04 And on the other section, not really with regard to
10:06:06 the east-west connector, but as we build the bridge
10:06:09 over I-75, there will be an impact on the West Meadows
10:06:12 community, because there will be traffic through that
10:06:15 community that doesn't exist today.
10:06:17 And we need to be very mindful of that.
10:06:20 That increased traffic, you have got a school on one
10:06:25 side of the street, you have got a beautiful community
10:06:27 center on the other side of the street, kids go back
10:06:29 and forth to use both of those facilities.
10:06:31 And we are going to have to make sure that as this
10:06:34 bridge gets developed that we keep that community in
10:06:38 mind as well.
10:06:39 And whether that means some sort of speed control for
10:06:43 New Tampa Boulevard through West Meadows, or we build
10:06:46 some safety islands in the middle as we go to expand
10:06:49 it from two to four lanes, that's a commitment that I
10:06:52 have made on the record for several years out there,
10:06:54 and we need to make sure that we follow through with

10:06:56 that as well.
10:06:57 So I didn't want anyone out there in New Tampa to
10:06:59 think that because we are building this that their
10:07:04 communities are going to be any more negatively
10:07:06 impacted than we can possibly keep from happening.
10:07:11 I think ultimately we will see a project that benefits
10:07:15 about 50,000 people that live in my community out
10:07:18 there.
10:07:19 I think it's going to be a financial success for the
10:07:23 expressway authority as well as whoever the private
10:07:24 developer is, a great test case, and truly the wave of
10:07:28 the future.
10:07:29 I want to thank everybody that's been involved in
10:07:30 this.
10:07:31 Madam Chair, if there's no other comment I would be
10:07:34 happy to move the resolution.
10:07:36 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion and second.
10:07:38 Question on the motion, Mr. Dingfelder.
10:07:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Why don't we see if there is
10:07:41 anybody else who wants to speak to it?
10:07:46 Don't see anyone.
10:07:47 That's fine.

10:07:49 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Council, this being official action I
10:07:51 would at least that you ask the opportunity for
10:07:53 anybody in the public that wishes to speak.
10:07:55 >>GWEN MILLER: Anyone else in the public like to speak
10:07:57 on item number 3?
10:07:58 Number 2.
10:08:01 We have a motion and second.
10:08:02 All in favor of the motion say Aye.
10:08:03 Opposed, Nay.
10:08:05 Okay.
10:08:08 Item number 3.
10:08:10 Item number 3.
10:08:20 Need to move the resolution.
10:08:23 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Move the resolution.
10:08:25 >> Second.
10:08:25 (Motion carried).
10:08:27 >>GWEN MILLER: Number 4, administration.
10:08:33 Affordable housing.
10:08:35 Miller.
10:08:36 >> Cindy Miller, director of business and housing.
10:08:41 And the PowerPoint, please, if that could be put up.
10:08:44 I'm here to discuss item number 4, which is the city's

10:08:47 plan to address affordable housing.
10:08:51 And where we have been in the recent years, and where
10:08:53 we are now, and where we plan to be in the future.
10:08:57 First of all let me talk about a little bit of the
10:08:59 definitions obtainable, affordable, for workforce
10:09:02 housing.
10:09:03 Obtainable and affordable to me basically can be the
10:09:06 same thing.
10:09:07 It means housing for individuals, for families, for
10:09:10 retirees, for working people, working people then
10:09:13 normally being the workforce housing, and also those
10:09:17 less fortunate than the folks we have talked about.
10:09:20 What is not affordable?
10:09:21 What is not affordable is when you spend more than 30%
10:09:24 of your gross income for your housing.
10:09:27 And that's whether it's rental or home ownership.
10:09:31 The slide that you have before you shows that for
10:09:33 families within Hillsborough County, and is provided
10:09:37 by the affordable housing, but for those folks whose
10:09:42 families income are roughly $16,000, over 70% of them
10:09:50 pay more than 30% of the gross income for their
10:09:51 housing needs. When income levels is 16,000 to

10:09:56 27,000, more than 65% spend more than 30%. When we
10:10:02 get into the levels of 27,000 to 43,000, approximately
10:10:06 45% of those families are spending more than 30%, of
10:10:11 their gross income.
10:10:13 And again, when we get to the next income level of
10:10:15 43,000 to 65,000 again almost 20% were still spending
10:10:22 more than 30% of gross income.
10:10:25 Why are we hearing more about affordable housing than
10:10:28 before when it comes to hearing the needs from our
10:10:30 citizens?
10:10:32 In our state, it takes two to three minimum wage jobs
10:10:39 within a household to even afford a very basic
10:10:41 two-bedroom apartment.
10:10:44 Some people working two jobs.
10:10:52 The numbers have been exchanged from a number of
10:10:56 providers.
10:10:56 When you look at 2000 to 2005 our housing costs within
10:11:00 our community has increased almost 80%, while salary
10:11:04 levels have increased less than 10%.
10:11:07 And as a matter of fact I received my statistics from
10:11:11 reading Florida trends from a couple of months ago, I
10:11:13 believe the February issue.

10:11:23 When you look at your children, you may go to a small
10:11:29 house or condo or townhouse and then hope to build up
10:11:31 to a larger home.
10:11:32 Then as we get through some of the ages where my
10:11:35 husband keeps selling my house out from under me, and
10:11:38 move into an apartment again.
10:11:41 At this age we want to look at different
10:11:43 accommodations.
10:11:44 So whether we are up the ladder or down the ladder we
10:11:46 are at a certain point within our housing, and that is
10:11:49 true of people within all income levels.
10:11:54 I am going to be using a couple of acronyms.
10:11:57 I want to be sure I clarify when I talk about the
10:12:00 ship, the state housing partnership money, basically
10:12:04 the federal funds.
10:12:06 So you will see a combination of ways that we finance
10:12:09 various projects.
10:12:10 The first slide you have here is the affordable,
10:12:13 whether the units were open, looking at 360 more.
10:12:20 3.1 million in ship funds. 600 that you in hope
10:12:24 funds.
10:12:24 Again this is the city's contribution.

10:12:26 This is not the total construction cost.
10:12:28 When we look at others that we have dub in the past
10:12:31 couple of years, we are looking at 55 owner occupied
10:12:36 homes rehabilitated, $1.9 million in ship funds for
10:12:40 that year.
10:12:41 71 families received down payment assistance.
10:12:43 That's $2.1 million.
10:12:45 And 632 repairs by the center for seniors.
10:12:50 This is when you approved the community development
10:12:52 block grants in recent years.
10:12:54 This is how we were able to partner with the center
10:12:56 for independent women and partnered with
10:12:58 organizations.
10:12:59 You will also hear partnership, partnership,
10:13:01 partnership from me as we go through here.
10:13:03 That is the way we are able to leverage our funds and
10:13:05 be able to assist citizens in our community.
10:13:09 There has been in-fill housing with the CBC of Tampa
10:13:12 with, the West Tampa CBC, and now we are looking at
10:13:17 additional unusual tiffs that we have implemented
10:13:19 recently.
10:13:20 And may I first compliment the manager of housing and

10:13:26 community division.
10:13:27 She has been the person who has been the catalyst.
10:13:29 I mentioned it the other day.
10:13:30 She has a missionary zeal when it comes to getting
10:13:33 things done.
10:13:34 I think sometimes she -- she keeps going.
10:13:39 She has established a qualified contractor's bidders
10:13:42 list for rehabilitation for new construction.
10:13:45 We started this year issuing RFQs, I should say last
10:13:50 year, for not for profit organizations, so therefore
10:13:53 there is statistical and financial information
10:13:55 provided by anyone that we partner with for not for
10:13:57 profits.
10:13:58 And we have established a design criteria for
10:14:01 single-family homes when they are built on city-owned
10:14:06 lots or what were previously city-owned lots.
10:14:08 We have written policies and procedures.
10:14:13 Written policies and procedures so that we have
10:14:16 credibility with the state and federal government
10:14:18 agencies.
10:14:19 And we also have, as you remember, and were so
10:14:22 gracious to allow us to almost walk this right on, we

10:14:26 had hurricane Katrina evacuees.
10:14:30 In the negotiations, for their rezoning and real
10:14:33 estate transactions in West Tampa we incorporated 20%
10:14:37 of the new homes within the entire development would
10:14:39 be affordable.
10:14:43 One of our key partnerships which was the Tampa
10:14:45 housing authority, and though I really admire you're
10:14:49 roam Brian, sometimes we are a little confused.
10:14:54 The housing authority is the entity that is a separate
10:14:57 entity from City of Tampa.
10:14:59 They are the ones that you would consider that would
10:15:01 handle the section 8 rental assistance, and also is
10:15:05 providing other opportunities for folks that are
10:15:11 throughout our community that as outlined whether it's
10:15:14 the Riverview or Belmont Heights and other capital
10:15:18 improvements.
10:15:19 They are also involved in partnering with us that we
10:15:22 provide down payment assistance, when folks are going
10:15:24 from rental public housing into their own homes.
10:15:29 What are some of our new initiatives?
10:15:31 We have already been before you this year for 18 lots
10:15:33 for single-family homes, to three non-profits.

10:15:37 We intend in the come weeks to issue a request for
10:15:40 qualification for not for profit builders and
10:15:43 individuals for the 55 city-owned lots that we have
10:15:47 thus far that are ready to have in-fill single-family
10:15:52 homes, and subsequently to that issue for those
10:15:57 properties.
10:15:59 We are about to come before you in the coming weeks
10:16:02 with an award for multifamily homes, to what you saw
10:16:06 on the first slide, multifamily rental property for
10:16:09 developers.
10:16:09 The key element this year that's different than last
10:16:12 year is we issued a request for proposal.
10:16:14 We were able to develop the criteria.
10:16:16 We were able to advertise it.
10:16:18 And we also would have the underwriting for that
10:16:21 project analyzed by neighborhood lending partners so
10:16:23 that we know that they can accomplish what they have
10:16:25 proposed.
10:16:26 We also intend to initiate an owner occupied emergency
10:16:29 repair program which we have not had historically.
10:16:32 Our rehabilitation previously is to bring the house up
10:16:35 to code.

10:16:36 But if you have sort of a catastrophic situation, we
10:16:38 have not had an emergency repair come in.
10:16:40 That is something that Sharon is initiating this year.
10:16:44 Last week, we partnered together, the administration
10:16:48 and the City Council, to be able to have the city
10:16:50 partner with the Hillsborough County housing finance
10:16:54 authority.
10:16:54 But we are providing $750,000 in ship funds to be able
10:16:59 to augment a $10 million bond issue, that the finance
10:17:03 authority is issuing.
10:17:05 This is a partnership that is the city, the county and
10:17:08 the housing finance authority that we are going to be
10:17:11 able to look at this wonderful leveraging.
10:17:13 We are participating by participating with $750,000
10:17:18 and we intend to be able to have a significant amount
10:17:20 of that $10 million go to mortgages for first-time
10:17:24 home buyers.
10:17:25 And we are already coordinating with them.
10:17:30 The bond issue closed earlier this week.
10:17:32 We intend to incorporate centers for affordable
10:17:35 housing and the chapter 27 code.
10:17:36 This will be a combination of looking over the

10:17:39 cross-city.
10:17:40 We are also looking as you all expect the CRA plans
10:17:44 throughout our community.
10:17:46 That we'll adopt that into code.
10:17:48 Again, this is a partnership opportunity.
10:17:50 It's where you offer incentives for developers to have
10:17:55 affordable housing within the development that they
10:17:58 are building throughout our community.
10:17:59 Again, we think incentive based is the way to go.
10:18:03 We also were looking at ways come to future projects
10:18:06 very similar to how we worked with intown properties,
10:18:14 looking at major developers within the community that
10:18:16 affordable housing will be an important component of
10:18:19 their projects.
10:18:21 In the coming weeks, the heights project will be
10:18:24 before you and we do contemplate there will be an
10:18:27 affordable project in that.
10:18:33 With the affordable housing task force that the county
10:18:36 initiated, I want to highly compliment and thank
10:18:39 Desiree Valdez as well as Sharon for their
10:18:42 participation in that affordable housing task force.
10:18:45 And when it comes to the partnerships, we need to

10:18:49 partner with developers, with not for profits, with
10:18:53 the county officials, and to give you one more example
10:18:57 that was a wonderful first-time partnership, is that
10:19:00 the city for the first time this week partnered with
10:19:03 the foundation to be able to provide first-time home
10:19:07 ownership and down payment assistance from our
10:19:10 standpoint for a new homeowner, a single mother with
10:19:13 two kids.
10:19:14 We also have an item on today's agenda, item number
10:19:17 27.
10:19:17 And I'll be very happy to address any questions if you
10:19:20 have any.
10:19:21 Thank you very much.
10:19:22 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Cindy, thank you for the update.
10:19:26 And Cindy and I found ourselves in mount Dora, of all
10:19:33 places.
10:19:33 Quite a shock.
10:19:34 I'm glad to see that we are working on a package of
10:19:37 incentives.
10:19:38 Because I think that we all agree that that's the way
10:19:40 to start.
10:19:42 And I wonder if you have had a chance to really sort

10:19:46 of they're creatively come up with what some of those
10:19:50 incentives might be.
10:19:51 And if you could share those.
10:19:52 If not, maybe just come back in a couple of months and
10:19:55 we can talk about it.
10:19:57 I don't think that creating a new layer of government
10:20:00 like they did down in county is really the way to go.
10:20:04 They think that's the way to go, that's fine, and
10:20:07 maybe that will work for them.
10:20:08 But I think that streamlining the process, maybe
10:20:14 letting folks that build affordable housing jump up a
10:20:17 couple of notches, as I think Mr. Dingfelder
10:20:19 suggested, not to the front of the line necessarily,
10:20:21 but move it along faster.
10:20:23 Those are really what's going to work.
10:20:25 As somebody that's just built a construction project,
10:20:29 the time of permitting is just mind boggling.
10:20:33 To build anything.
10:20:34 And it's not just us.
10:20:36 It's everywhere.
10:20:37 And if there is anyway to reduce that time frame,
10:20:41 that's the biggest incentive.

10:20:42 Because as that time frame gets extended the project
10:20:45 becomes more and more costly and less and less
10:20:50 affordable.
10:20:58 That's where I think we should start.
10:21:00 And I think we have unanimous agreement on that.
10:21:04 >>> Councilman, you are absolutely right.
10:21:05 And
10:21:10 When it comes to first of all the incentives, we will
10:21:13 be back before you, probably during the summer we
10:21:20 intend to have those meetings with stakeholders
10:21:22 throughout the community and we intend to have code
10:21:24 modifications to you by the end of August.
10:21:26 So that way, and again, some of what we are looking at
10:21:29 is whether bonus densities, things of that nature,
10:21:33 that is sort of overall what we are looking at.
10:21:36 But also looking at a broader base.
10:21:37 Going to the second aspect, you're absolutely right.
10:21:44 When it comes to affordable housing, workforce
10:21:46 housing, this is not just a project that is the
10:21:48 division of housing community development.
10:21:50 It's all of our differentiations.
10:21:51 It's really throughout the city, not just my

10:21:55 department.
10:21:55 When it comes to construction service center
10:21:58 especially, we have a track record with residential
10:22:00 housing, with one or two units, the in-fill, whether
10:22:03 you come to the front of the line for approval.
10:22:06 And then from an overall standpoint also, someone who
10:22:10 has built a number of homes can be -- that if that
10:22:14 plan with Construction Services Center has already
10:22:18 been approved, it extremely streamlines the project.
10:22:22 So we are already doing that to a significant degree
10:22:25 but plan to pursue it more aggressively.
10:22:28 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Thanks, Cindy Miller.
10:22:41 Good to see we have a plan.
10:22:43 And I appreciate you thanking Desiree for being on the
10:22:46 task force.
10:22:50 She was very happy to be able to participate in this
10:22:52 endeavor.
10:22:56 We are coming into hurricane season.
10:22:58 So my question is, these type of developers, buildings
10:23:04 that are come in, are they being given guide lanes as
10:23:07 to what type of windows or roofs or doors they are
10:23:15 putting on these houses to be wind resistant?

10:23:18 Or are we just letting them do willy-nilly?
10:23:23 >>> Councilwoman, wet comes to the requirements for
10:23:26 any construction for residential or commercial within
10:23:29 our city, the construction service center makes sure
10:23:32 that the latest code that we have adopted from the
10:23:35 state standpoint as well as our local code are fully
10:23:39 complied with.
10:23:39 They do not approve the plan unless it meets the codes
10:23:42 that have been established.
10:23:44 >> I went on that bus tour that the Tampa housing
10:23:48 authority did Tuesday and --
10:23:51 >>ROSE FERLITA: Saw your picture in the paper.
10:23:55 Ding very nice.
10:23:56 >>MARY ALVAREZ: I was really impressed with the
10:23:59 quality of work that the housing authority is doing
10:24:01 especially for the affordable housing unit of it.
10:24:05 And I want to make sure that that type of development
10:24:13 happens in the city.
10:24:14 As you know, we are trying to do something in the Drew
10:24:17 Park area which we desperately need to get going on
10:24:20 there.
10:24:20 And I would like your assurance that we do get

10:24:23 something done before the end of this fiscal year.
10:24:30 It's very important because people in that area are
10:24:32 looking forward to something that we do have the CRA
10:24:34 as you well know.
10:24:35 And we are working really, really hard to make sure
10:24:40 that something gets going in that area.
10:24:42 So I want your assurances.
10:24:46 >>> My department works very closely with the CRA
10:24:49 managers throughout the city and that is certainly our
10:24:51 focal point to make sure there is affordable housing,
10:24:54 workforce housing throughout the community.
10:24:55 >> Now the other question I had, when you talk about
10:24:57 first-time home buyers adopting, does that qualify
10:25:02 anywhere in the city?
10:25:03 Or is it just in the city-owned lots?
10:25:06 >>> The down payment assistance, and I think down
10:25:08 payment assistance is one of the best kept secrets
10:25:11 within our community.
10:25:12 It qualifies throughout.
10:25:14 So that if someone finds a house, or townhouse that
10:25:17 they want to purchase, it will depend upon the average
10:25:21 median income, as to exactly which program they

10:25:25 qualify for, whether state money or federal money.
10:25:28 To give you an idea -- and what will be before you for
10:25:31 the items today is that we intend to increase the
10:25:33 amount of down payment assistance that's available,
10:25:36 that is part of what's item 26.
10:25:39 And then also one thing that we have found that has
10:25:43 constrained our system for folks is that when it comes
10:25:46 to our current maximum home price, right now the
10:25:50 maximum home price that we participate in is $164,000.
10:25:54 And I would basically challenge most of us to find
10:25:56 very much housing for $164 that you.
10:25:59 So we have found that our applicants automatically
10:26:01 sometimes have to be rejected because the house costs
10:26:04 more.
10:26:05 With your action today we will be able to increase the
10:26:08 state's participation for a house up to $226,000.
10:26:13 That doesn't mean that every house will when it has
10:26:18 every level of participation.
10:26:19 But that will authorize that -- let me give you an
10:26:25 example.
10:26:25 For a family of three people under our state program,
10:26:28 their income level -- again a single-parent with two

10:26:33 kids or could be a couple with one child, if their
10:26:37 income is roughly $58,000, they will qualify for down
10:26:39 payment assistance.
10:26:41 And so they would at least be able to look at, make
10:26:45 sure that they can, through their individual financial
10:26:47 situation, be able to make the payment.
10:26:50 We don't set people up for failure.
10:26:52 And so it does not have to be housing that is
10:26:57 sponsored through the city.
10:26:58 That can be housing that anyone from a market rate
10:27:01 standpoint goes out and acquires and applies for the
10:27:04 down payment.
10:27:05 Again when you are looking at what people are paying
10:27:07 with more than 30% of gross income, it's very
10:27:10 difficult to get the down payment together.
10:27:14 So therefore we are able to give them that assistance
10:27:16 that they then can make the payments as long as they
10:27:20 have -- the first leg up on the ladder, how about
10:27:23 that?
10:27:26 >> I'm glad to see we are moving forward as a city,
10:27:29 because it's desperately needed especially with
10:27:34 housing nowadays, anything, condos, apartments,

10:27:37 anything else, it's just ridiculous the prices --
10:27:40 prices that are being asked for and for what you get.
10:27:43 So I'm glad to see that we are working on it.
10:27:47 Thank you.
10:27:50 >>KEVIN WHITE: Ms. Miller, kudos to you and your
10:27:53 department as well as Ms. Valdez for doing a fine job.
10:27:58 I think one of the primary incentives, with all the
10:28:00 city-owned land that we do have now, that weighed on
10:28:04 the tax rolls for years and years and years, we may
10:28:08 want to look at possibly not giving but selling at a
10:28:14 very, very reasonable price, not even at market rate
10:28:17 but below market rate, for developers now as an
10:28:21 incentive.
10:28:22 And has an extra added incentive for the developer to
10:28:27 also offer down payment assistant -- assistance to the
10:28:31 home buyer.
10:28:31 That way, we get the property back on the tax rolls.
10:28:35 We get in-fill development.
10:28:38 We have more affordable housing units on line.
10:28:40 Also one of the things that we may want to look at
10:28:43 city-wide, like what we did in in-town properties in
10:28:47 West Tampa, they have several different variations and

10:28:51 elevations of homes and designs.
10:28:52 We may want to start looking at some of these 50,
10:28:56 60-foot lots and seeing what we can do, and we can
10:28:59 break those up and build two very nice affordable,
10:29:04 spacious homes, on one lot in that particular area.
10:29:10 Then we can accommodate two families rather than one,
10:29:12 maybe with a two-story style type of development, and
10:29:16 be something that is attractive, as well as
10:29:20 innovative, and it helps everyone.
10:29:23 It will help the developer.
10:29:24 Helps them with their land costs.
10:29:27 Helps get city-owned property that's vacant,
10:29:30 overgrown, an eyesore, back on the tax rolls, gifts
10:29:36 people new places to stay, creates new neighbors ands
10:29:40 neighborhoods, creates better aesthetics in
10:29:43 neighborhoods, and some of the folks that I think we
10:29:45 need to really look at -- and that may be a very
10:29:50 creative motivator for your private developers to step
10:29:56 forward and go ahead and move forward.
10:30:01 >> Councilman, that is where you and I talked about
10:30:04 this several months ago when we identified that we had
10:30:06 55 lots, they have been reviewed, that we intend to

10:30:09 make available during the coming summer months.
10:30:12 And that's exactly what we intend.
10:30:15 It's not just to sell off the lots so you sold off the
10:30:18 lots.
10:30:19 It's that we will sell the lot, make sure -- we have
10:30:21 already made sure that these are buildable lots from a
10:30:24 dimensional standpoint.
10:30:25 In a couple cases we made sure that -- maybe we took
10:30:30 too small a lot and made them buildable.
10:30:34 Again this would be without payment assistance.
10:30:37 We also can provide for a builder some assistance, as
10:30:42 to assisting them with the financing cost at the
10:30:44 beginning, that they do not have to pay us back for
10:30:48 the closure on the project.
10:30:49 And so it is something definitely we are trying to put
10:30:53 every piece of the puzzle together to provide the most
10:30:55 affordable --
10:30:57 >>KEVIN WHITE: In West Tampa, we didn't deem most of
10:31:00 those as buildable because they were 25, to 30 feet
10:31:07 wide.
10:31:07 And back to the old character of West Tampa, that
10:31:10 particular group came up with some very innovative

10:31:13 ideas, and elevations to make that very attractive.
10:31:17 But I'm saying we can also do the same thing in other
10:31:20 parts of town with different elevations that will
10:31:22 still blend in with the character and integrity.
10:31:27 >>> The tradition in Tampa, the single levels.
10:31:31 I think Sharon was the one nagging us, how come we are
10:31:34 not seeing more two stories?
10:31:36 >>KEVIN WHITE: Last week in our zoning hearings, we
10:31:38 had a petitioner come before us with New York-style
10:31:42 brown stones.
10:31:43 Those aren't seen in Tampa either.
10:31:45 And there's new conventional types of architectural
10:31:50 styles and construction that are going on all over
10:31:52 town.
10:31:53 And I think that's one of the things we need to look
10:31:56 at, as well as embrace.
10:31:57 >>> Absolutely.
10:31:57 >>GWEN MILLER: Mrs. Saul-Sena, then Mr. Dingfelder.
10:32:02 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I'm happy to see all that you have
10:32:08 accomplished in the last year.
10:32:09 It's really exciting.
10:32:10 Two quick points.

10:32:11 Design guidelines, excellent.
10:32:12 I'm very pleased to see that.
10:32:14 It needs to be that you can pick out affordable
10:32:16 housing because it looked kind of nyaaagh.
10:32:23 And secondly, the state, I know, has a very large pot
10:32:27 of money that was created, to create affordable
10:32:30 housing and they haven't been spending it.
10:32:32 I know that next year, we the city are getting a
10:32:35 lobbyist, our own lobbyist in Tallahassee.
10:32:37 I want them to -- want them to work on that.
10:32:40 I want them to -- at least 150 million or 500.
10:32:44 It's a huge pot of money that is not being made
10:32:46 available for affordable housing that should be.
10:32:48 I noticed we got editorial support in the papers.
10:32:52 We need to get that money, need some work with our new
10:32:57 legislative delegation.
10:32:58 People are running for office.
10:32:59 The city needs to see all these aspiring legislators
10:33:03 know that they need to bring home the bacon in terms
10:33:05 of the state dollars.
10:33:07 Because it would mean a tremendous amount for us in
10:33:09 terms of expanding our program.

10:33:10 So I hope that we will be aggressive and working with
10:33:12 our local legislative delegation, and state wade to
10:33:16 get more of that money back here.
10:33:18 >>> We certainly intend to.
10:33:19 And I do thank council for their support during this
10:33:23 session.
10:33:23 As some additional funds were freed up, from a
10:33:28 management standpoint to aggressively pursue those,
10:33:30 but you're absolutely right, we need to get more of
10:33:33 those funds freed up in the future years.
10:33:37 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Ms. Miller, the fun of coming to
10:33:40 council is you never know what kind of questions you
10:33:41 are going to get.
10:33:43 So here is one from left field.
10:33:51 Yesterday I got a call from folks down in a mobile
10:33:53 home park by the MacDill Air Force Base, holiday
10:33:57 mobile home park, on inner bay.
10:33:59 It's an old mobile home park.
10:34:01 And it's one of the last ones in South Tampa, because
10:34:06 they are all being converted over to apartments or
10:34:08 condos or what have you.
10:34:10 And it's sad, but it's, I guess, unavoidable in terms

10:34:15 of a private property owner owns the dirt.
10:34:18 Many folks brought their mobile homes and sat on that
10:34:22 property owner's dirt for many years but now he's
10:34:24 saying you have six months and you need to leave. The
10:34:26 folks down there are very confused.
10:34:30 They have some rights under state law.
10:34:31 They have some limited rights under local law.
10:34:34 But they are very confused about that.
10:34:35 So what I want to do, because this is about affordable
10:34:38 housing, and some of these mobile homes cannot be
10:34:41 moved.
10:34:42 Some of these folks are going to need to know where
10:34:44 they can go, what their options are, what their rights
10:34:47 are under the law.
10:34:48 So what I am going to do is organize a meeting down
10:34:50 there.
10:34:52 I would like either you or Sharon to come join me.
10:34:54 I would like David Smith, and somebody from his staff,
10:34:57 to come join us so that we can talk about what their
10:35:01 legal rights are.
10:35:02 And we will need to help these folks.
10:35:06 There's probably 100 families down there.

10:35:08 And they are really in limbo. Anyway, I'll get with
10:35:12 you on that.
10:35:13 But I just wanted to give you a heads-up on it.
10:35:16 >>GWEN MILLER: Cindy, my question is, if citizens
10:35:21 interested in affordable housing don't know what steps
10:35:23 to finding one, what do they do?
10:35:29 I want everybody to know.
10:35:36 >>> I would be happy to provide them.
10:35:39 >>
10:35:39 274-7954.
10:35:43 That's the housing and community development office.
10:35:46 >>GWEN MILLER: I had someone ask me and wanted to put
10:35:50 it out.
10:35:50 Baugh because we have a lot of people that want a
10:35:52 house and didn't know how to get one.
10:35:54 >>> We'll be happy to help them in whatever way we
10:35:57 can.
10:35:58 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank you.
10:35:58 Okay?
10:36:00 Any other questions?
10:36:01 Thank you.
10:36:02 Job well done, Mrs. Miller and Mrs. West.

10:36:06 Thank you for the good work.
10:36:08 Mr. Shelby, number 5.
10:36:12 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I would like to move number 3.
10:36:35 >>GWEN MILLER: We did already.
10:36:36 Mr. Shelby, you want to do number 8?
10:36:39 >>MARTIN SHELBY: You want to reopen public comments?
10:36:47 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
10:36:52 would like to ask for reconsideration?
10:36:57 Is there anyone in the public that would like to ask
10:36:59 for reconsideration?
10:37:01 Now we are going to go to our audience portion.
10:37:03 Is there anyone in the public that would like to speak
10:37:05 on any item on the agenda that is not set for public
10:37:08 hearing?
10:37:12 Come on up.
10:37:13 Time for the public to speak.
10:37:15 That's okay, come on up.
10:37:19 >>> My name is Agnes Stanfield, and had wonderful
10:37:28 public transit but one is that the downtown area is
10:37:32 very old and there is no way cars could be
10:37:34 accommodated.
10:37:35 And then if streets, were like a Cobb web so cars

10:37:41 could go for miles and here in Tampa we have a lot of
10:37:46 right hand turn lanes and left-hand turn lanes that
10:37:48 really mess up.
10:37:49 If I am going to be on Kennedy, if I want to go to
10:37:55 the number 36, I have to get off at starling, one
10:37:59 block east of Dale Mabry, and then walk one block west
10:38:05 at either risk my life crossing Kennedy or walk
10:38:07 another block to go north to catch the northbound bus.
10:38:11 And also we have a lot of minor flooding problems.
10:38:18 Near Sally O'Neill.
10:38:22 2112.
10:38:24 And the bus on a rainy day cannot drive up to the
10:38:29 O'Neill parking lot to let me out where I won't be
10:38:31 stepping in water.
10:38:33 All these things would come to bus transit.
10:38:37 I was so glad to have people talking about the
10:38:41 presentation of Jan Washington.
10:38:42 She is going to be a wonderful asset to the City of
10:38:44 Tampa for years to come.
10:38:46 She believes very strongly in city departments working
10:38:49 together, and people with walk at least four blocks to
10:38:56 a bus stop if they can walk four blocks to the bus

10:38:59 stop.
10:38:59 And I think at several different meetings over the
10:39:02 next couple of years, and we are trying to set up a
10:39:05 grassroots thing and bring groups together, and in
10:39:10 December, Roger, from South Tampa, greater Hyde Park,
10:39:20 he got Toni Short from Hartline and we met at bellos.
10:39:27 We set up a meeting at Kate Jackson in early December
10:39:30 and a meeting was scheduled.
10:39:36 It was a rainy day and people in wheelchairs were
10:39:40 sitting at the number 19 bus stop at the doctors
10:39:42 building on Swann and Gomez a little west of memorial.
10:39:45 Well, people don't want to see people in wheelchairs
10:39:48 waiting in the rain because there's in a shelter.
10:39:50 So when I put fliers around some of the doctors
10:39:54 buildings, I couldn't do one at each office.
10:39:59 There's so many doctors' offices.
10:40:01 And I very politely said to the receptionist, please
10:40:04 tell the doctors, when you give them the flier about
10:40:08 the meeting that people got really upset seeing two
10:40:11 people in wheelchairs sitting in the rain because
10:40:13 there are no shelters.
10:40:15 And I talked to Hartline.

10:40:17 And those of us who know more would rather have the
10:40:24 bus go down DeLeon because it's safer to cross.
10:40:27 And if they have to go on Swann, we are thinking maybe
10:40:30 Gomez, and Swann, and it floods.
10:40:45 And I find a lot of ignorance when I talk to people.
10:40:49 They don't understand --
10:40:51 (Bell sounds).
10:40:52 >>GWEN MILLER: Finish your sentence.
10:40:54 >>> They don't understand if the right is -- if the
10:40:58 right-of-way, you can't put a shelter on it.
10:41:00 And if we want more shelters, we need to get people to
10:41:04 understand -- city property, county property, state
10:41:08 property, federal property, it's suitable for a
10:41:11 shelter, we could start with that.
10:41:14 >>GWEN MILLER: Okay.
10:41:15 >>> I also asked my state representative and my
10:41:19 congressional representative Jim Davis to look into
10:41:26 issues, and I think this is one of them.
10:41:29 >>GWEN MILLER: Would anyone else like to speak?
10:41:30 We will go to our committee reports.
10:41:35 Everybody has left, we are not going to go to that.
10:41:38 Go back to ordinances for first reading.

10:41:42 Okay.
10:41:49 First reading.
10:41:49 We need to open number 7 through 9.
10:41:52 >> So moved.
10:41:53 >> Motion and second.
10:41:54 (Motion carried).
10:41:56 >> Does anyone in the public want to speak on item
10:41:58 number 7?
10:41:59 >> Move to close.
10:42:01 >> Second.
10:42:01 (Motion carried).
10:42:02 >>KEVIN WHITE:
10:42:09 >>KEVIN WHITE: Move an ordinance vacating, closing,
10:42:17 discontinuing and abandoning a certain right-of-way a
10:42:20 portion of church Avenue lying between west Paxton
10:42:23 Avenue and west Pearl Avenue in Gandy manor a
10:42:30 subdivision in the City of Tampa, Hillsborough County
10:42:32 Florida the same being more fully described in section
10:42:34 2 hereof providing an effective date.
10:42:36 (Motion carried).
10:42:37 >>MARTIN SHELBY: These are first readings that do not
10:42:40 require public hearing.

10:42:42 These will be set for public hearing in two weeks'
10:42:44 time.
10:42:46 >>GWEN MILLER: Okay.
10:42:47 Mr. Smith.
10:42:48 >>DAVID SMITH: City attorney.
10:42:50 I believe we have sent a memorandum to you asking you
10:42:53 to postpone item number 8 to the 22nd.
10:42:56 I know the 22nd is a very busy agenda but I don't
10:42:58 think we are going to need a great deal of discussion
10:43:01 on the 22nd.
10:43:03 Don't want to go into great detail but I'm really
10:43:06 doing so in order to make sure that we cover all the
10:43:08 bases as fully and properly as we must in order to
10:43:12 ensure that everything will furnishings as it has to
10:43:15 in order for this proposal to succeed, if you should
10:43:19 go forth.
10:43:23 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Such a vague sentence.
10:43:27 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Mr. Smith, I have some concerns
10:43:28 about this.
10:43:29 Would it be appropriate for me to raise them now or it
10:43:32 would be appropriate to wait till the 22nd?
10:43:36 >>> I think it would be better to wait till the

10:43:38 22nd but I would like to speak with you before
10:43:40 that.
10:43:40 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Great.
10:43:43 >> Move to continue.
10:43:44 >> Second.
10:43:44 (Motion carried).
10:43:44 >>GWEN MILLER: Mrs. Alvarez?
10:43:48 >>MARY ALVAREZ: I just wanted to ask.
10:43:49 Because this is an extension of the transportation
10:43:53 impact fee zone.
10:43:54 And I was just wondering if we put this off, I know we
10:43:59 are going to do that in a couple of weeks.
10:44:01 I was wondering what would happen to the projects that
10:44:03 are in the hopper right now that are already waiting
10:44:10 for approval of this extension.
10:44:14 >>DAVID SMITH: This extension will be nunc pro tunc
10:44:17 which is a legal term which means retroactively to the
10:44:19 expiration date of the initial granting.
10:44:22 So that will be covered.
10:44:23 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Good.
10:44:26 Thank you.
10:44:26 >>GWEN MILLER: Mrs. Alvarez, item 9, please.

10:44:29 >>MARY ALVAREZ: An ordinance -- authorizing the
10:44:35 installation and maintenance of an encroachment a
10:44:39 cantilever supported existing canopy by royal Frank,
10:44:42 LLC, over a portion of the public right-of-way known
10:44:44 as North Franklin Street near the intersection of
10:44:47 North Franklin Street and roil street as more
10:44:50 particularly described herein subject to certain
10:44:52 terms, covenants, conditions and agreements as more
10:44:55 particularly described herein providing an effective
10:44:57 date.
10:44:59 >> Second.
10:44:59 (Motion carried).
10:45:02 >>GWEN MILLER: Now we go to our committee reports.
10:45:04 Mary Alvarez, parks and recreation.
10:45:06 >>MARY ALVAREZ: I would like to move items 10 to 12.
10:45:10 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Second.
10:45:12 (Motion carried).
10:45:13 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. John Dingfelder, public works.
10:45:19 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'll move item 13.
10:45:25 The shortest one ever from my committee.
10:45:28 >> Second.
10:45:28 (Motion carried).

10:45:28 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I just wanted to say on 13, it's
10:45:32 not an insignificant item.
10:45:34 It's a $38 million bond issue that the city is issuing
10:45:39 specifically to improve our sewer system.
10:45:42 Not only at the plant, but also, we have a lot of
10:45:48 instances where the sewers are up to 100 years old,
10:45:52 they are collapsing and creating problems for our
10:45:54 streets.
10:45:54 We had one this week.
10:45:55 And Ralph Metcalf and his team and Bonnie Wise are
10:46:04 working very hard on this issue, we are going to get
10:46:07 the best rates possible and improve our sewer system
10:46:09 tremendously over the next -- I guess it's a 30 year
10:46:12 plan.
10:46:12 Also, I'll bet Sal is probably involved.
10:46:16 >>GWEN MILLER: Finance Committee, Mr. Kevin White.
10:46:17 >>KEVIN WHITE: Move items 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19.
10:46:22 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Second.
10:46:25 >>KEVIN WHITE: Holding 16 until the end of the
10:46:30 meeting?
10:46:35 (Motion carried)
10:46:37 >>CHAIRMAN: Building an zoning.

10:46:39 Shawn Harrison, vice chair.
10:46:48 >>SHAWN HARRISON: I move items 20 through 28.
10:46:55 >> Second.
10:46:55 (Motion carried).
10:46:57 >>GWEN MILLER: Transportation, Mr. Shawn Harrison.
10:47:00 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Move 29 through 31.
10:47:03 >> Second.
10:47:03 (Motion carried).
10:47:06 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Move items 32 through 37.
10:47:11 >> Second.
10:47:15 (Motion carried).
10:47:16 >>GWEN MILLER: We go to our public hearings for second
10:47:18 reading.
10:47:20 Items 38 through 44.
10:47:31 >>KEVIN WHITE: Move to open all those.
10:47:33 >> Second.
10:47:33 >>GWEN MILLER: Would anyone in the public want to
10:47:36 speak on these items 38 to 44, please stand and raise
10:47:39 your right hands.
10:47:43 THE CLERK: Do you solemnly swear or affirm to tell the
10:47:46 truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
10:47:48 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that

10:47:51 wants to speak on item 38?
10:47:53 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Move to close.
10:47:54 >> Second.
10:47:55 (Motion carried).
10:47:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Move to adopt the following
10:48:00 ordinance upon second reading, an ordinance vacating,
10:48:02 closing, discontinuing, abandoning a portion of a
10:48:05 certain right-of-way a part of the alleyway lying
10:48:07 south of Marconi street north of Clark street east of
10:48:11 26th street, and west of 28th street in VIN
10:48:16 GUERRA, a subdivision in the City of Tampa,
10:48:18 Hillsborough County Florida the same being more fully
10:48:21 described in section 2 hereof providing an effective
10:48:22 date.
10:48:24 >> Second.
10:48:24 >>GWEN MILLER: Vote and record.
10:48:31 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Ferlita, Saul-Sena
10:48:33 being absent.
10:48:34 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
10:48:36 wants to speak on item 39?
10:48:38 >> Move to close.
10:48:39 >> Second.

10:48:40 (Motion carried).
10:48:40 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Move to adopt the following
10:48:49 ordinance upon second reading, an ordinance of the
10:48:51 city of Tampa, Florida establishing the east on park
10:48:53 community development district for the purpose of
10:48:55 managing and delivering basic community infra
10:48:57 structure improvements within a parcel of land
10:49:00 generally located off Morris Bridge Road approximately
10:49:02 one mile south of the Pasco and Hillsborough County
10:49:04 line comprising 343.71 acres more or less entirely
10:49:08 within the boundaries of the City of Tampa,
10:49:10 Hillsborough County, Florida, the same being more
10:49:13 particularly described in section 2 hereof pursuant to
10:49:15 chapter 190, Florida statutes, providing for
10:49:18 severability, providing an effective date.
10:49:19 >> I have a motion and second.
10:49:20 Vote and record.
10:49:28 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Saul-Sena being
10:49:29 absent, Dingfelder voting no.
10:49:33 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
10:49:34 wants to speak on item 40?
10:49:36 >> Move to close.

10:49:37 >> Second.
10:49:37 (Motion carried).
10:49:38 >>MARY ALVAREZ: I move to adopt the following
10:49:43 ordinance upon second reading, an ordinance
10:49:46 authorizing certain encroachments, balconies,
10:49:48 canopies, and appurtenant subsurface foundations, over
10:49:53 a portion of the public right-of-way known as 15th
10:49:56 street and 5th Avenue generally located in the
10:49:59 northwest intersection of 15th street and 5th
10:50:02 Avenue in the City of Tampa, Hillsborough County, as
10:50:04 more particularly described herein, subject to certain
10:50:07 terms, covenants, conditions and agreements and more
10:50:10 particularly described herein, providing an effective
10:50:12 date.
10:50:13 >> I have a motion and second.
10:50:15 Vote and record.
10:50:23 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried unanimously.
10:50:25 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
10:50:27 wants to speak on item 41?
10:50:29 >> Move to close.
10:50:30 >> Second.
10:50:30 (Motion carried).

10:50:31 >>ROSE FERLITA: Move the following ordinance upon
10:50:38 second reading, an ordinance containing alcohol of
10:50:43 more than 1% by weight and not more than 14% by weight
10:50:46 and wines regardless of alcoholic content beer and
10:50:49 wine 2(COP-R) for consumption on the premises only in
10:50:51 connection with a restaurant business establishment at
10:50:53 or from that certain lot, plot or tract of land
10:50:56 located at 19010 Bruce B. Downs Boulevard, Tampa,
10:50:59 Florida as more particularly described in section 1
10:51:01 hereof waiving certain restrictions as to distance
10:51:04 based upon certain findings, providing for repeal of
10:51:06 all ordinances in conflict, providing an effective
10:51:08 date.
10:51:09 >>GWEN MILLER: Motion an second.
10:51:11 Vote and record.
10:51:20 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried unanimously.
10:51:22 >>GWEN MILLER: Mrs. Saul-Sena?
10:51:23 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I wanted to make a comment on 42.
10:51:28 42 represents, I believe, the beginning of a trend
10:51:33 that we are going to start to see.
10:51:38 Everybody in the community recognizes how special the
10:51:40 Hillsborough River is, I believe we are going to see

10:51:42 more situations like this where an existing
10:51:45 single-family home surrounded by a great deal of
10:51:49 property is transformed into more and more dwellings.
10:51:54 And I am going to support this because the petitioner
10:51:58 went back and redesigned it to make it less intrusive
10:52:02 and to make it a bit better.
10:52:04 But in an effort to get ahead of way see is a stream
10:52:09 of requests like this, I would like to ask that city
10:52:13 staff consider the development of a river overlay to
10:52:21 look specifically at open space along the river, and
10:52:26 to look at drainage to make sure that the river isn't
10:52:29 negatively impacted from the chemicals that are used
10:52:34 on people's lawns because in the old days, they
10:52:38 weren't the perfect lawns that they are today, and to
10:52:40 just come up with any other things that they might
10:52:43 want to do to maintain the character of the river, and
10:52:49 make sure that our beautiful river in the future isn't
10:52:55 McMansionized, if I can make that into a verb, because
10:52:59 that would be the request to report back in maybe 60
10:53:01 days, and I have already.
10:53:06 I have already discussed this with Cathy Coyle and the
10:53:09 ladies that do rezoning, and I believe that other

10:53:12 communities already have this like in Pinellas County,
10:53:14 where they have property on the waterfront.
10:53:16 And they could come back to us with a suggestion.
10:53:19 So that would be a motion for them to look at what
10:53:22 components might go into a river overlay or river
10:53:25 protection zone or whatever you want to call it.
10:53:29 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Second.
10:53:30 (Motion carried).
10:53:32 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
10:53:34 wants to speak on item 42?
10:53:37 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Move to close.
10:53:38 >> Second.
10:53:38 (Motion carried).
10:53:39 >>KEVIN WHITE: Move the following ordinance upon
10:53:46 second reading.
10:53:46 Move an ordinance rezoning property in the general
10:53:48 vicinity of 4033 north river view Avenue in the city
10:53:52 of Tampa, Florida and more particularly described in
10:53:54 section 1 from zoning district classifications RS-50
10:53:57 residential single family to PD single-family semi
10:54:01 detached, providing an effective date.
10:54:02 >>GWEN MILLER: Motion and second.

10:54:05 Vote and record.
10:54:12 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Dingfelder absent at
10:54:14 vote.
10:54:14 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
10:54:16 wants to speak on item 43?
10:54:19 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Move to close.
10:54:21 Oops.
10:54:22 >>HEATHER LAMBOY: I have been sworn.
10:54:25 Land development.
10:54:26 The letter passed around right now relates to this
10:54:29 particular case.
10:54:29 I would like to point out that we have three members
10:54:31 of the aviation authority present at this meeting, and
10:54:39 a concern has been raised regarding this project
10:54:41 located on Washington Avenue in downtown.
10:54:46 In part of your packet there was a letter addressed to
10:54:48 petitioner regarding the height of this project, and
10:54:51 how the petitioner may start the permitting process
10:54:54 through the aviation authority, and unfortunately that
10:54:58 did not occur.
10:54:59 So between first reading, there were a couple of
10:55:03 meetings with the aviation authority, as to how to

10:55:06 deal with the issue of height on this particular
10:55:09 project.
10:55:09 I would like to read into the record a letter from the
10:55:11 petitioner to the aviation authority that communities
10:55:17 an understanding as to the aviation authority's review
10:55:20 of this project.
10:55:22 Ms. Jones, it's a pleasure meeting with you on the
10:55:25 aviation staff reporting the condominium project in
10:55:28 downtown Tampa.
10:55:29 As discussed today we are currently rezoning in the
10:55:33 City of Tampa which will establish a maximum and
10:55:35 minimum under the code, unit count price, et cetera.
10:55:40 The developer acknowledges and stipulates the
10:55:42 following regarding the process relating to height
10:55:45 approval.
10:55:45 The zoning approval granted by the City of Tampa,
10:55:48 maximum building height only, and subject to
10:55:53 Hillsborough County aviation authority and federal
10:55:55 aviation authority review and permitting.
10:55:59 Final vote on height approved by the HBAA and may be
10:56:02 less, that the formal applications for the overall
10:56:07 permit height must be issued by HBAA prior to permits

10:56:13 issued by the City of Tampa prior to commencement of
10:56:15 construction, that the zoning approval for our
10:56:17 proposed project sets a maximum height of 630 feet
10:56:20 which is conceptual and subject to final determination
10:56:23 during HBAA and FAA permitting, that the HBAA has
10:56:27 indicated based on their current analysis that the
10:56:29 maximum safe height of the building to be 458 feet
10:56:34 above the medium sea level.
10:56:37 Should you have any questions regarding this, please
10:56:40 contact me.
10:56:41 And it closes.
10:56:43 I would like to say that there are two kind of
10:56:45 provision that is address this issue.
10:56:46 First of all, in the code, section 27-97 B, the
10:56:53 aviation authority has jurisdiction over height in the
10:56:56 city, and second of all, the substantial deviation
10:57:02 criteria also addressed changes to site plan.
10:57:06 Now, if the height of the building were just lowered
10:57:10 to 158 feet as required by the aviation authority and
10:57:13 no other design change were to occur, then Ms. Moreda
10:57:17 in her capacity as the director of land development
10:57:19 would be able to approve that.

10:57:21 However, if there were any design changes in terms of
10:57:24 bulk, massing, and setbacks, those changes would have
10:57:28 to comment back to the council for their review and
10:57:32 approval.
10:57:33 So I would just like to clarify that the aviation
10:57:36 authority currently has capacity in the code to limit
10:57:39 the height lower than the zoning approval.
10:57:41 However, if there's any other change that occurs,
10:57:46 that's a substantial change, then this does have to be
10:57:48 reviewed by the Tampa City Council.
10:57:50 I want that made clear.
10:57:52 Just as an aside, we get 90% of the time the
10:57:58 petitioner does go to the aviation authority and make
10:58:01 sure the height is consistent with their zoning
10:58:02 approval.
10:58:03 Just to avoid the situation in the future, the
10:58:05 aviation authority and the city is going to change the
10:58:08 protocol, and provide information up front as to
10:58:11 maximum height.
10:58:14 And we have a map now illustrating maximum height.
10:58:18 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Well, I appreciate that
10:58:20 explanation.

10:58:20 And I think it is an important explanation.
10:58:24 I think there was an article in the paper that seemed
10:58:26 to create some -- it didn't create some of the
10:58:28 confusion, it sort of -- I don't know.
10:58:34 >> Underscored.
10:58:35 >> Underscored some of the confusion.
10:58:37 There you go.
10:58:37 I guess if you lop off a couple of floors of height
10:58:42 that they might have to do, subject to these -- they
10:58:48 might also lose parking spaces, or floor of parking or
10:58:51 something like that.
10:58:52 Is that the type of thing that would you anticipate
10:58:55 would come back to us or no?
10:58:57 >> Well, if the architecture exchanges substantially,
10:59:01 and that was Gloria's determination, whether it's
10:59:04 substantial deviation, then they have to come back.
10:59:07 And that's the risk they are taking.
10:59:08 Right now they have explained top me they don't want
10:59:10 to go back to first reading because of contractual
10:59:12 obligation.
10:59:14 The architecture has to be akin to what has been
10:59:18 approved.

10:59:19 One level of parking garage that I think is going to
10:59:22 be lopped off, I think it's --
10:59:29 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: But the bottom line is, if they
10:59:32 lost, you know, 30, 40 units, and they said, well, you
10:59:36 know, that's going to impact our entire project, and
10:59:39 therefore we can't do this retail on the bottom floor,
10:59:41 and we are going to have to change that, those are the
10:59:44 types of things you bring back to us.
10:59:46 >> Yes, that that would be a substantial change.
10:59:48 This project has 17% open space on the base.
10:59:51 And if they are saying in order to capture some of the
10:59:54 loss we have in height we need to have more of our
10:59:57 site as usable space, then we'll say we had to go back
11:00:02 to City Council for review and approval.
11:00:04 >> And Mr. Smith, since you are the owner's
11:00:08 representative today, would you concur with everything
11:00:10 that's been said by staff?
11:00:12 >>DAVID SMITH: I have been sworn.
11:00:14 401 East Jackson Street for the petitioner.
11:00:16 Yes, sir, that's exactly how we understand it.
11:00:18 Any design changes that affect floor plate open space,
11:00:24 parking conditions, it's all set down as a substantial

11:00:28 change criteria in the code.
11:00:29 We understand that and we need to be back before you.
11:00:32 We are going to move through the FAA process and they
11:00:36 will ultimately set the height and will determine
11:00:38 whether or not any design changes are required.
11:00:40 And if they are substantial we'll have to be back
11:00:44 before council.
11:00:45 >> I'm sure Mrs. Saul-Sena probably asked this at
11:00:47 first reading but does this have the one-third,
11:00:50 one-third review by Wilson?
11:00:52 >>> Yes, sir.
11:00:52 It's stipulated on the site plan.
11:00:55 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
11:00:56 wants to speak on item number 43?
11:00:59 >> Move to close.
11:00:59 >> Second.
11:00:59 (Motion carried)
11:01:04 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Move the following ordinance upon
11:01:11 second reading, an ordinance rezoning property in the
11:01:14 general vicinity of 501 and 507 east Washington street
11:01:18 and 102 north Morgan street in the city of Tampa,
11:01:21 Florida and more particularly described in section 1

11:01:24 from zoning district classifications CBD-1 central
11:01:28 business district parking lot, to CBD-2, central
11:01:31 business district mixed-use retail, residential,
11:01:35 providing an effective date.
11:01:36 I want to compliment the petitioner on a beautiful
11:01:38 project.
11:01:38 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion and second.
11:01:40 Question on the motion, Mr. Shelby.
11:01:42 >>MARTIN SHELBY: The public hearing is already closed,
11:01:44 is that right?
11:01:45 >>GWEN MILLER: Yes.
11:01:46 >>> I just want to raise a concern, and I had the
11:01:49 opportunity to speak with the petitioner's
11:01:52 representative, with Ms. O'Dowd.
11:01:54 There is a section in here that I want to be clear
11:01:55 that that what was said is irrespective of this
11:02:02 statement, it says with regard to substantial changes,
11:02:04 however.
11:02:05 Amenities appropriate --
11:02:09 >> Move to reopen.
11:02:10 >> Second.
11:02:10 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'm sorry.

11:02:13 (Motion Carried).
11:02:14 >>MARTIN SHELBY: referring to the changes provision in
11:02:16 27-323, that Ms. Lamboy referenced.
11:02:20 However, any amendment change or alteration required
11:02:23 by conditions from any regulatory agency having
11:02:26 jurisdiction over development shall be presumed not to
11:02:29 be a substantial change, providing that no alternative
11:02:32 solution is available.
11:02:33 And my understanding from speaking with Mr. Smith is
11:02:36 that it's his interpretation that that would only
11:02:39 affect the height of the property, anything related to
11:02:41 the footprint, or anything related to the parking or
11:02:45 what's been previously discussed.
11:02:46 This provision, or this sentence would not per our
11:02:50 Land Development Coordination, for this to be a
11:02:52 substantial change.
11:02:57 >>> David Smith for petitioner.
11:02:58 I have been sworn.
11:02:58 Yes, that is our understanding.
11:03:00 That's the way we read it.
11:03:01 Basically, FAA, TIA control height.
11:03:04 If they lop off requirement reduction in the scale of

11:03:07 the building, then at that time, that would be the
11:03:09 only change that would not be considered substantial
11:03:12 change.
11:03:12 Any other changes from that would be reviewed by
11:03:17 coordination, looked at the code, and determine
11:03:19 whether it's substantial, would require coming back to
11:03:21 council.
11:03:21 So we understand that situation.
11:03:23 >> And you stipulate to that?
11:03:24 >>> Yes.
11:03:25 >> Move to reclose the public hearing.
11:03:29 >> Second.
11:03:29 (Motion carried).
11:03:29 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion and second on the
11:03:31 ordinance.
11:03:33 Vote and record.
11:03:41 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Alvarez being absent.
11:03:44 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
11:03:46 wants to speak on item 44?
11:03:51 >>HEATHER LAMBOY: Land development.
11:03:53 I have been sworn.
11:03:55 This property, if you recall, O'Brien street, wanting

11:04:02 clarification regarding what happens with water
11:04:05 quality for the entire site.
11:04:07 The petitioner described how he's going to do it but
11:04:10 doesn't say exactly what happens.
11:04:11 And because of the flooding in this area, the
11:04:14 stormwater.
11:04:18 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Your recommendation is what?
11:04:20 >>> Just add the note one half retention on the site.
11:04:26 >>GWEN MILLER: Already put it on there?
11:04:27 >>> It's not on there.
11:04:31 >>GWEN MILLER: When are you going to clearly state it?
11:04:34 >> I think the question is does need to go back to
11:04:37 first reading?
11:04:43 >>CATHLEEN O'DOWD: Legal department.
11:04:48 I think given the additional language that the
11:04:51 stormwater department would like to add to the site
11:04:53 plan, this would require to go back to first reading.
11:04:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Do you have language today we could
11:04:59 just make this first reading?
11:05:00 >>HEATHER LAMBOY: Yes, I have the language today.
11:05:05 Shall comply with stormwater regulations.
11:05:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: If there's no objection from

11:05:12 counsel, I'll move to just add that, and make this
11:05:17 first reading.
11:05:19 Legal counsel, I meant.
11:05:26 >> Is petitioner here?
11:05:27 >>CATHLEEN O'DOWD: Legal department.
11:05:28 The ordinance hasn't changed.
11:05:32 The site plan has the same date.
11:05:33 We are just adding a note to the existing site plan.
11:05:36 So the ordinance that was previously read two weeks
11:05:39 ago could be read again today on first reading.
11:05:42 >>GWEN MILLER: Mrs. Ferlita?
11:05:44 >>ROSE FERLITA: Where is the petitioner? Is
11:05:46 petitioner here?
11:05:47 >>GWEN MILLER: You said last week you had that one?
11:05:54 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Council, I have a concern.
11:05:56 How do you make changes to a site plan without a
11:05:58 petitioner present?
11:06:00 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: They can object at second reading.
11:06:03 >>HEATHER LAMBOY: And I called the petitioner when I
11:06:06 noticed he was not here and he has no objections.
11:06:08 >>GWEN MILLER: He knows there will be changes?
11:06:11 >>> Yes.

11:06:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Move to adopt the following for
11:06:12 first reading as amended.
11:06:14 Oh, did we close?
11:06:18 >>GWEN MILLER: Need to close first.
11:06:20 >> Move to close.
11:06:21 >> Second.
11:06:21 (Motion carried).
11:06:23 >>ROSE FERLITA: Madam Chairman, maybe because of the
11:06:27 fact that I'm sure -- I would prefer to send e-mail
11:06:32 and petitioner come back the second time.
11:06:35 I'm uncomfortable doing it in his absence.
11:06:38 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'm actually trying to help the
11:06:40 petitioners.
11:06:41 >>ROSE FERLITA: I understand that.
11:06:43 And I fully supported the second.
11:06:46 But I think petitioner should be here and he's not.
11:06:48 And at second reading it will all come together.
11:06:51 But my vote is no.
11:06:52 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Move an ordinance rezoning property
11:06:57 at 7706, 7708, 7707, 7709, 7711 South O'Brien Street
11:07:03 in the city of Tampa, Florida and more particularly
11:07:05 described in section 1 from zoning district

11:07:08 classification IG industrial general to PD single
11:07:11 family detached residential, providing an effective
11:07:13 date.
11:07:15 >> Second.
11:07:15 >>ROSE FERLITA: Nay.
11:07:19 (Motion carried).
11:07:20 >>GWEN MILLER: Item 45 cannot be heard.
11:07:24 Ms. Lamboy, are you going to speak on 45?
11:07:29 Who is speaking on that?
11:07:31 Ms. O'Dowd, are you speaking on 45?
11:07:35 Appeal?
11:07:36 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I don't believe it can be heard.
11:07:40 The question is whether it is allowed -- are they
11:07:43 present, or -- has anybody heard?
11:07:46 >>GWEN MILLER: Is anyone here for item number 45?
11:07:48 >>ROSE FERLITA: Was this continued one time already?
11:07:54 >>GWEN MILLER: No, this is the first.
11:07:56 >> I think it was actually.
11:08:03 >>THE CLERK: It cannot be heard today.
11:08:08 Council can reschedule, but Mr. Guyton was supposed to
11:08:15 notify our office when it could be heard because his
11:08:17 wife is going to be out of town until October.

11:08:20 >>GWEN MILLER: Continue it to when?
11:08:23 >>ROSE FERLITA: No action taken?
11:08:33 >>> You can move to remove it from the agenda and
11:08:35 allow them --
11:08:39 >>ROSE FERLITA: I would like to make a motion to move
11:08:41 it through agenda, give them the opportunity to come
11:08:43 back and it another time.
11:08:46 >>GWEN MILLER: Motion and second to remove it from the
11:08:47 agenda.
11:08:50 >> Second.
11:08:50 >>MARTIN SHELBY: It appears that petitioners are not
11:08:53 present.
11:08:53 Is that correct?
11:08:54 >>GWEN MILLER: Right.
11:08:54 They are not here.
11:08:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: One other clean-up item.
11:08:58 Mr. White, if you want to move item 15.
11:09:00 I talked to Mr. Spearman, and I think we'll go ahead
11:09:04 and get the contract for this year and maybe do
11:09:07 something else next year.
11:09:09 >>KEVIN WHITE: Move item 15.
11:09:12 >> Second.

11:09:12 (Motion carried).
11:09:13 >>GWEN MILLER: Item number 46.
11:09:16 It's a discussion meeting with school board.
11:09:19 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Just a point of order.
11:09:22 How long do we think this will take?
11:09:24 And --
11:09:33 >> 40 minutes?
11:09:34 >>SHAWN HARRISON: We have an opportunity to not come
11:09:36 back after lunch today.
11:09:37 If we could get it done.
11:09:40 >> Our goal will be noon.
11:09:43 >>RANDY GOERS: Strategic planning and technology.
11:09:45 We are going to give you a status report on the public
11:09:49 school facility element, school concurrency project.
11:09:52 And remember the state laws require concurrency to go
11:09:57 into effect for public school facilities by July 1,
11:10:03 2008.
11:10:03 City of Tampa has been selected to be one of six
11:10:05 communities to develop a model interlocal agreement in
11:10:10 public school facility element that the Department of
11:10:11 Community Affairs can use for other communities
11:10:14 throughout the state.

11:10:16 The four interlocal jurisdictions and school board and
11:10:19 Planning Commission have been working since December
11:10:21 on a model facilities element.
11:10:25 We were hoping to make this meeting where we would
11:10:27 present the entire element to you and have that
11:10:31 forwarded to DCA to get their concurrence on the
11:10:33 direction where we are going.
11:10:35 However, there has been a few delays on the
11:10:37 consultant's part as bringing all the information
11:10:39 together.
11:10:40 So the school board has asked DCA for a 30-day
11:10:44 extension.
11:10:44 Today we are just going to give you an update on some
11:10:47 of the key issues, some of the things that we have
11:10:49 completed, and the school board is here to give you an
11:10:51 overview of some of the outstanding items that we are
11:10:53 going to be looking at over the next three weeks.
11:10:57 I will be asking at the end of the workshop if we
11:10:59 could set another workshop on June 22nd where we
11:11:04 can come back to you and get your final concurrence on
11:11:06 the models, and be transmitted to at DCA.
11:11:11 What's happened to date, we have produced a draft of a

11:11:14 model interlocal agreement which was presented to you
11:11:16 for a real cursory review.
11:11:19 The last time we were here, DCA looked at that, and I
11:11:23 think they are going in the right direction of what
11:11:27 they would like to see in a model interlocal
11:11:29 agreement.
11:11:30 We are working on the model of the public school
11:11:33 facilities element.
11:11:34 It's an element that will be planning policies
11:11:38 throughout the county, different jurisdictions, about
11:11:43 you the actual implementation concurrency will be the
11:11:45 same.
11:11:47 That element will contain policies, and we have had
11:11:50 some draft policies that establish the level of
11:11:52 service standards for the schools, that establish
11:11:57 concurrency service areas, that we agreed that the --
11:12:02 in line with the school attendance zones, and that the
11:12:06 developed procedures for the review and mitigation of
11:12:11 impacts, when there's no capacity.
11:12:13 We still have a lot to do in terms of the actual data
11:12:18 analysis that the element is based on.
11:12:21 And I'll let school board give you an update on where

11:12:23 we are going with that.
11:12:26 We have the framework for the procedures and the
11:12:28 policy and the mechanism to implement concurrency.
11:12:30 We'll want to -- as we move to the analysis where are
11:12:35 the actual needs, where are the schools today that are
11:12:38 at capacity, where woo Do we project deficiencies?
11:12:44 Where is the plan for providing those facilities and
11:12:46 how do they relate to the framework that we want to
11:12:48 put in place?
11:12:49 I think we all want to be clear that what we are
11:12:51 putting in place is a system that we can manage growth
11:12:54 with the timing -- or the timing of the facilities,
11:12:58 and that analysis when we come back in the next few
11:13:01 weeks, we'll be looking at a short-run deficit, are we
11:13:05 looking at something that's two or three years out,
11:13:07 something five or six years down the road?
11:13:09 So if there's no questions for me, I would like
11:13:14 Lorraine Duffey to come up and give you a look at some
11:13:19 of the specifics and where we are at, at this point.
11:13:22 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I don't know who I pose this
11:13:25 question to.
11:13:28 Maybe nobody wants to answer it.

11:13:30 But as we all know, the county commission adopted or
11:13:35 is in the process of adopting a new ordinance to
11:13:39 increase impact fees in the county.
11:13:42 And I think it's long overdue.
11:13:45 I think ultimately they go from a couple hundred
11:13:47 dollars to gnaw house, for school impact fees.
11:13:55 My question is this.
11:13:57 When it comes to transportation impact fees -- and I'm
11:14:00 not telling you anything you don't know -- we break
11:14:02 the city up into zones, into specific zones, and we
11:14:05 say, okay, I think it's four, five, six different
11:14:09 zones for transportation impact fees.
11:14:10 And they are different.
11:14:12 If you build a house in South Tampa you are going to
11:14:15 pay a different impact fee for that house than if you
11:14:18 build it somewhere else in the city.
11:14:19 And based upon the analyses and the needs and that
11:14:22 sort of thing, and of that particular district, and
11:14:27 what I am wondering about is, it appears right now
11:14:30 that because we have one school board, we have one
11:14:36 school district that's a thousand square miles, that
11:14:41 if the city didn't do anything different, that if you

11:14:44 build a house in South Tampa for a new house, you
11:14:49 would pay that $4,000 because there are huge needs out
11:14:53 on the other side of the county.
11:14:56 I'm just wondering, has anybody thought to visit, you
11:15:00 know, breaking up the county in terms of the needs of
11:15:03 the different parts of the county?
11:15:05 And I'm not even talking about whether or not the city
11:15:10 limits or Temple Terrace or Plant City, or just
11:15:13 breaking the county up into quarters or something.
11:15:17 And it's a controversial question.
11:15:20 It's a difficult question.
11:15:21 But I think it's something that we should talk about.
11:15:28 >>> There's a legal answer to that and there's some
11:15:29 planning answers to that. I can give you from the
11:15:31 planning perspective. The public schools facility
11:15:34 element is required to show us where all the needs
11:15:37 are.
11:15:37 Countywide.
11:15:38 Where the needs are regardless of the jurisdiction.
11:15:41 And the plan that the school board has in place to
11:15:44 meet those needs.
11:15:45 Then the local government works through its long-range

11:15:47 planning and growth to help make that all work.
11:15:52 It's a long-range plan to help bring that together.
11:15:55 And it doesn't look at the jurisdictional needs.
11:15:57 It looks at the needs of the entire county.
11:15:59 So your questions will be in terms whereof the impacts
11:16:02 are, where the needs are, where do we foresee needs
11:16:06 and foresee facilities being put in place with the
11:16:10 answer to that element.
11:16:11 Now in terms of whether or not we can look at terms of
11:16:15 impact fee zones, whether that is a legal question,
11:16:22 they can answer a little bit of that.
11:16:24 >> And David, as you are coming up, the legal side of
11:16:27 me and the equitable side of me would ask that
11:16:29 question again.
11:16:31 You know, why would we have zones, relatively small
11:16:35 zones, in South Tampa, we have the Interbay
11:16:39 transportation impact fee zone which is basically from
11:16:41 Kennedy south to MacDill Air Force Base.
11:16:44 We have a very tight zone.
11:16:45 And we look at transportation impact fees in that
11:16:49 zone.
11:16:49 And then we assess the fees accordingly.

11:16:54 So I'm just wondering why we wouldn't be doing that or
11:16:56 something similar on education.
11:17:00 >>DAVID SMITH: City attorney.
11:17:01 That's an excellent question.
11:17:03 And the best I can do at this juncture is probably
11:17:06 provide you some observations.
11:17:09 Although that is generally true in areas such as
11:17:12 transportation uniquely zoned so that your benefit and
11:17:16 burden is traceable in a rational way, the general
11:17:19 case law that I have seen tends to treat school
11:17:21 districts on a district-wide basis.
11:17:24 The case law is not, as I probably said before, the
11:17:29 model of clarity.
11:17:31 So I want to look at that a little more closely.
11:17:33 But some of the cases I found, one of which Mrs.
11:17:36 O'Dowd located for me, deals with the requirement of a
11:17:38 district-wide analysis and an impact fee that was
11:17:41 enacted that was not district wide, was not considered
11:17:43 to be sufficient, constitutionally, and was
11:17:48 unfortunately turned aside.
11:17:49 That having been said -- pardon?
11:17:52 In Florida, yes, sir.

11:17:53 That having been said, the new growth management act
11:17:57 made several changes.
11:17:58 It's basic concurrency as a district-wide basis first
11:18:03 contemplates the possibility of having a concurrency
11:18:06 issue other than district wide at some juncture.
11:18:09 I'm not familiar with the process that gets us there.
11:18:11 I know that's different from impact fees but these are
11:18:13 all interrelated because what wave to have is a
11:18:16 capital improvement element that shows that the
11:18:18 improvements will be on line within a time period,
11:18:21 requisite to allow the development, a good portion of
11:18:23 the cost for those will come from impact fees, whether
11:18:29 the county or city or some combination that I'll
11:18:31 address in a minute, so that all has to be tied
11:18:34 together in order to make sense.
11:18:35 All of this is exacerbated by a rather arcane if not
11:18:39 esoteric way of funding our school system.
11:18:41 So we need to factor that in as well.
11:18:44 And I think the short answer is, and I talked to
11:18:46 Lorraine earlier about this, we are going to need to
11:18:49 have a much more open and active dialogue with the
11:18:52 school board.

11:18:53 Because, among other things, for example, we may have
11:18:55 a magnet school in the City of Tampa, I believe we do.
11:18:59 It's that's downtown.
11:19:01 We take students from all over the county.
11:19:05 Yet we may have a need for a new school downtown when
11:19:08 we build Tampa Heights.
11:19:09 But we have a facility, I believe power is the name,
11:19:13 which is nearby.
11:19:14 But how is that going to count in our capacity?
11:19:17 So I there's a lot of issues we need to address that I
11:19:19 have not seen addressed adequately yet.
11:19:22 Your question is absolutely on point. The simple
11:19:24 legal answer is that under the charter, if the county
11:19:28 passes an order instances that applies countywide, it
11:19:30 is applicable countywide, unless the city passes a law
11:19:35 that addresses the same subject matter.
11:19:37 That would suggest that we could, at least in county
11:19:42 and city government, we could do something about this.
11:19:45 Now, I want to caution you, though, because I have not
11:19:47 looked at all of these other issues that deal with
11:19:50 school funding, unified, the whole issues that come
11:19:53 up.

11:19:54 So I don't want to mislead you.
11:19:58 Simple service answer it looks like we could do
11:20:00 something but come back to with you a much more
11:20:02 comprehensive explanation which is one of the reasons
11:20:05 I asked to continue this.
11:20:06 This is not an easy area.
11:20:08 And everybody is grappling to find their way including
11:20:13 the school board.
11:20:14 It's a new era.
11:20:15 And we need to establish new policies and processes
11:20:18 for addressing these things.
11:20:21 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Mr. Smith, we are eagerly awaiting
11:20:30 the results of your research.
11:20:31 >>GWEN MILLER: Now we will hear from the school board.
11:20:37 >>> Lorraine Duffey Suarez, manager of Growth
11:20:40 Management for the school board.
11:20:41 If I could just make a couple comments on Mr.
11:20:44 Dingfelder's remarks as well.
11:20:45 And I don't really have an opinion formed on it.
11:20:47 But other issues, I think, Mr. Smith mentioned, the
11:20:51 magnet program that we also have a choice program,
11:20:54 which means if you live in one part of an area, you

11:20:57 can go to a school and not necessarily a neighborhood
11:20:59 school, you can go to a school in another part.
11:21:02 Also, when you talk about the cost, we have a need in
11:21:06 the county, which you're right, we have quite a bit of
11:21:08 growth in the county.
11:21:09 But we can build a large school and some larger
11:21:12 acreage in the unincorporated county.
11:21:15 In the city we are going to be paying probably more
11:21:18 money for the land to build the new school and
11:21:20 paying -- probably one of the smaller schools because
11:21:23 so the cost per student station rises when you start
11:21:26 buying smaller pieces and start building smaller
11:21:29 schools in the city.
11:21:30 So there's sort of a trade-off for different impacts.
11:21:33 If you're looking for a new school in the city, what
11:21:35 we have to construct might not -- it might actually
11:21:38 end up being more cost efficient in the unincorporated
11:21:41 county because we didn't find a larger piece and more
11:21:46 students.
11:21:46 So a lot of different choice that is we have to
11:21:48 evaluate in this.
11:21:49 The magnet program. The choice program.

11:21:50 It's not like a new development has specific impact.
11:21:53 Everyone is going to be going to one school because
11:21:56 they actually have choices to go outside their
11:22:00 neighborhood boundary.
11:22:02 It gets very complicated, which brings me to where I
11:22:05 am right now.
11:22:06 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I think we can all agree on one
11:22:08 thing, a complicated subject, and that's why we are
11:22:11 glad you are over there.
11:22:17 I can see your point especially when you get into
11:22:20 parts of the city that are close to the county where,
11:22:24 you know, it starts blurring, the line starts blurring
11:22:27 very quickly.
11:22:28 Up towards town and country.
11:22:30 You know, you have got obviously the city and county
11:22:37 you have students going back and forth.
11:22:39 But then there are other parts of the city that are
11:22:41 more isolated, that even under the choice program, the
11:22:47 choice program doesn't -- it's not realistic.
11:22:55 So it's not just a South Tampa issue.
11:22:57 I think it's just an issue that you is complex and we
11:23:00 need to continue to explore.

11:23:02 >>> I don't disagree.
11:23:03 I was just saying it gets even more complex when you
11:23:06 start like the Blake magnet high school.
11:23:08 That has kids from unincorporated county in there.
11:23:12 Who are coming in.
11:23:13 Out in the county we have magnet programs with city
11:23:17 kids probably.
11:23:18 Of course I'm not on the curriculum side so I can't
11:23:20 give you a lot of detail on that.
11:23:22 Anyway, it pulls right into where we are heading here
11:23:25 with the element.
11:23:26 You already heard about the interlocal agreement, the
11:23:28 last time I was here.
11:23:29 And especially the element itself is going to have
11:23:32 four parts to it, if you want to think of it that way.
11:23:35 You have one component, coordination of information.
11:23:40 Your population projections, your growth trends, your
11:23:43 school siting criteria and the development approvals
11:23:46 and school capacity.
11:23:48 That's sort of how we are going to coordinate that
11:23:51 with each local element.
11:23:55 Then we have policy section, policy as far as schools,

11:23:58 community design, a lot of these are policies that
11:24:00 already exist in the comprehensive plan, that we are
11:24:03 pulling into the school element.
11:24:05 Those that are new are a result of school -- of new
11:24:10 state law.
11:24:10 So out there creating new policies using what you have
11:24:16 or using what the state is requiring to us do to put
11:24:18 those in.
11:24:19 Then we also have policies and we'll have to address
11:24:22 pedestrian safety, and facilities, the state requires
11:24:25 that.
11:24:25 And the use of schools for emergency shelters, which
11:24:28 again we already do, but now have to meet in that
11:24:31 element.
11:24:32 The implementation component is something we already
11:24:34 talked about in the interlocal agreement.
11:24:36 And he's that's the level of service standards and the
11:24:39 proportionate fair share and the general procedures on
11:24:41 how concurrency will work.
11:24:43 And then the capital facility planning.
11:24:49 That's what I talked a little about and that's what
11:24:51 you are hitting on.

11:24:53 It's the funding issue.
11:24:56 How we can provide the capacity that in this case, in
11:24:59 the City of Tampa, that you need to support the growth
11:25:02 that you are expecting.
11:25:03 And that's an important part of this program, because
11:25:06 we are going to be looking at each school at the
11:25:09 concurrency service area.
11:25:11 We have established a level of service through the
11:25:13 interlocal agreement.
11:25:14 We are saying 100% of what we call fish, the Florida
11:25:18 inventory of schoolhouses.
11:25:19 They we each school for capacity of students.
11:25:24 They say we don't want to go over that.
11:25:26 But the question remains, and we could actually ask
11:25:29 for an extension from the state today. Was our due
11:25:31 date.
11:25:31 I think almost every one of the six asked for an
11:25:37 extension, because we need to get that financial
11:25:39 information to pull together the legislative session
11:25:43 and we got additional -- in our case we have impact
11:25:47 fee additional revenues, and about two weeks ago the
11:25:49 state also said, by the way, you need to consider

11:25:53 charter -- charter schools as part of the capacity,
11:25:56 which is news to us.
11:25:57 We had not considered charter schools capacity because
11:26:00 we had actually reduced our student generation rate.
11:26:04 When a new development comes in, usually you see it in
11:26:07 your backup report for a new development.
11:26:09 We provide a report to your staff saying how many
11:26:11 students we project this new development will
11:26:14 generate.
11:26:18 >> That number has actually been reduced by the number
11:26:21 of students who don't attend public schools, private
11:26:26 school children, home schooled children.
11:26:29 But the state says, no, you must adopt it.
11:26:31 And they just let us know that.
11:26:33 So we asked for an extension where the state has
11:26:35 granted -- I got that word just as I was getting ready
11:26:38 to come down here, that they granted it.
11:26:41 So what we need to do is figure out with our new
11:26:44 revenue, which is $93 million estimated for the next
11:26:47 two years, additional money to build classrooms for
11:26:51 kids, as we call it, for the capacity being lost
11:26:55 during the class size amendment, we lost about 25%

11:26:58 capacity of elementary schools, and a little -- hey
11:27:03 schools of about 10% capacity because we have to
11:27:06 reduce the class size.
11:27:10 So we need to get that information together.
11:27:12 And that's one of the main issues.
11:27:16 And the question I want to be able to answer for all
11:27:18 of you.
11:27:19 You want to know, if we have a school that has -- is a
11:27:26 capacity does that mean it has to shut down?
11:27:29 Of course the state also allows to you look at the
11:27:32 service areas which are the schools adjacent to it to
11:27:34 get capacity.
11:27:35 So one school is over capacity but the school next
11:27:40 door is not.
11:27:41 The way the statute is written the developer is going
11:27:43 to be allowed to count the capacity next door.
11:27:47 We have to figure out, how do we get those children
11:27:49 there?
11:27:50 Are we going to change the boundary or bus children
11:27:52 from the new development?
11:27:53 So there are some procedural issues that are still
11:27:55 being worked out.

11:27:56 That's one of the reasons we asked for this extension.
11:28:00 We also need to figure out the pipeline.
11:28:03 I know I mentioned this last time.
11:28:05 And working with your staff and the other three
11:28:07 jurisdictions as well, how much development approved
11:28:10 is out there that's not going to be subject to
11:28:12 concurrency?
11:28:13 Every time you approve new development, that
11:28:16 development is not going to be subject to concurrency
11:28:19 if it's not passed a certain point before concurrency
11:28:24 goes into effect.
11:28:26 According to the statute, I believe it's the final
11:28:31 plat.
11:28:31 Anybody who has a final plat isn't going to be subject
11:28:34 to concurrency when you adopt your ordinance.
11:28:36 And we have a lawyer right there that will probably
11:28:38 figure that out for us.
11:28:39 But we need to know how many of those are out there,
11:28:42 how many people are holding a final plat.
11:28:48 I think where they have all these lots out there,
11:28:52 somebody division lots, but what's the rate?
11:28:55 What rate should we expect?

11:28:59 Are any of them ever going to go?
11:29:01 From all four jurisdiction Weiss need to build that in
11:29:04 because that will affect the level of service that can
11:29:07 be accommodated in each school.
11:29:10 And then how do we implement this concurrency system?
11:29:13 That's another outstanding question.
11:29:15 Because the statute -- each local government has a
11:29:19 different way of measuring and issuing their. Org
11:29:24 doing their concurrency review.
11:29:26 And when they issue those concurrency capacity
11:29:28 certificates, we need to have general uniformity, is
11:29:32 what the statute says.
11:29:33 I think uniformity in the way that we apply this,
11:29:36 which means we can't have one government saying, well,
11:29:38 you can go all the way down to the CO before you have
11:29:42 this concurrency test.
11:29:43 But another local government saying, well, you have to
11:29:45 do it as a preliminary.
11:29:48 We needed to have it where the developer who is
11:29:53 spending millions of dollars or hundreds of thousands
11:29:55 anyway has some surety that it's going to proceed.
11:29:59 Downright want somebody to get almost to the end and

11:30:01 then find out they can't meet concurrency.
11:30:03 So those are still some of the outstanding questions
11:30:06 we need to answer.
11:30:06 It's complex.
11:30:07 And there's a lot of data that we still need to
11:30:09 collect.
11:30:10 We need to look at each school over the five-year
11:30:14 planning period.
11:30:17 What is their projected population in that school?
11:30:21 We are still working on an issue with DCA.
11:30:34 And the concurrency -- and it doesn't make sense.
11:30:53 You need to look at
11:31:03 How can we possibly be meeting concurrency every
11:31:05 single year?
11:31:06 That development is going to come in.
11:31:09 And then that raises another question we so need to
11:31:12 define, the statute, projects that are under
11:31:16 construction can be counted.
11:31:18 Within three years -- within the first three years of
11:31:20 your five-year plan.
11:31:24 Look under construction.
11:31:25 You can start a high school but it's not going to be

11:31:27 done for two and a half years.
11:31:28 So if you say under construction, but that capacity is
11:31:31 quite frankly not going to be there until the end of
11:31:34 that, I don't think that's fair to anybody.
11:31:36 So you need to define some of these terms.
11:31:39 We are doing a model.
11:31:40 I think what we need to know is we are doing a model
11:31:43 here.
11:31:44 We have plenty of time for us to refine the products
11:31:48 we ask you to adopt.
11:31:49 The model is one product.
11:31:51 And I think that's been very helpful to us to have all
11:31:56 the professional staff on it.
11:31:57 But once the model component is finished, that's when
11:32:00 we really get into the nuts and bolts of how it
11:32:03 affects the City of Tampa.
11:32:04 Have more time to sit down and work out.
11:32:08 So that's where we are.
11:32:10 I can answer any more questions on that.
11:32:11 And again I don't really have any information on the
11:32:14 impact fee other than to say that there is a lot of
11:32:17 different components that we need to think about when

11:32:20 we go to the impact fee study.
11:32:22 The impact fee ordinance.
11:32:26 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Is there any consideration given to
11:32:28 transportation costs?
11:32:30 Because in the city, as we build in neighborhoods,
11:32:36 smaller schools, where the kids could potentially walk
11:32:39 to Tampa Heights, for example, you all will save a
11:32:46 great deal of money on transportation, which I know is
11:32:48 a separate subject from your capital costs.
11:32:51 But is there any thought given to those -- to
11:32:55 transportation costs as part of the lifetime
11:32:58 sustainability of school facilities?
11:33:01 >>> I can't say it's done exactly that way.
11:33:04 It may be done.
11:33:05 I can't say that it is or isn't done.
11:33:06 I know that some of the conversations that I have been
11:33:08 in is exactly that.
11:33:11 You have two problems, when you think that one, the
11:33:15 parents almost always want to drive their child
11:33:18 anyway.
11:33:18 They don't want them to walk.
11:33:20 Walk.

11:33:20 The other issue if you don't have the sidewalk.
11:33:23 That's another issue.
11:33:24 The statute says we have to have sidewalks within two
11:33:27 miles of every school.
11:33:28 >> What I'm saying is in the county and big
11:33:31 subdivisions, I don't know what they are doing but in
11:33:33 the city we are redeveloping neighborhoods with an eye
11:33:35 toward than encouraging walkable neighborhoods, small
11:33:38 scale schools, which might be more expensive, as you
11:33:41 said during construction, but life cycle costs you
11:33:45 save on the transportation, because they are being
11:33:47 creative.
11:33:48 The school community center to incentivize people to
11:33:54 walk with their kids.
11:34:00 >>> Making them a focal point of neighborhoods.
11:34:01 At least the elementary.
11:34:03 >> Yes.
11:34:03 Good.
11:34:04 >>> And I think they are already thinking that way.
11:34:08 >> It's already on your plan.
11:34:10 >>> I am going to go back and find out about that if
11:34:13 that is one of the components when we site schools.

11:34:17 >> And I have information to share with you.
11:34:18 >>> Okay, great.
11:34:19 >>GWEN MILLER: Other questions by council members?
11:34:21 Any discussion on item number 5?
11:34:25 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: When are we reconvening?
11:34:29 >>> June 22nd.
11:34:31 >> I would like a follow-up on June 22nd where we
11:34:35 can then bring to you the final draft of the model,
11:34:39 public facility element, and then hopefully have all
11:34:42 the answers to the questions that we raised today for
11:34:45 you all.
11:34:49 >>GWEN MILLER: June 22nd.
11:34:57 It's a nature meeting.
11:35:06 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Does it require any action prior to
11:35:08 that?
11:35:10 >>> Before you make your final decision.
11:35:19 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: The 15th is no piece of cake
11:35:25 either.
11:35:29 We need to see the element.
11:35:33 >>DAVID SMITH: City attorney.
11:35:34 Let me clue you in on this conversation.
11:35:36 It's important.

11:35:37 We are trying to figure out whether we could do a date
11:35:40 different than the June 22nd date because you have
11:35:43 so much going on that date.
11:35:44 The problem is the school board has to have this
11:35:46 council look at the element, and their contract is not
11:35:49 only extended to July 3rd.
11:35:52 And we don't have a meeting on the 29th.
11:35:56 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: How about the 15th?
11:35:59 >>DAVID SMITH: The 15th?
11:36:01 >>> My concern is because we want to give you time to
11:36:04 read it.
11:36:07 That's pretty much next week.
11:36:08 And I don't think I will have the element in a form
11:36:11 that I will feel comfortable you trying to make sense
11:36:14 of.
11:36:15 >>GWEN MILLER: Mrs. Saul-Sena?
11:36:17 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I'm prepared to suggest that we do
11:36:19 this at close of meeting for the morning meeting,
11:36:22 theoretically, on the 22nd.
11:36:26 >>GWEN MILLER: Close of the meeting --
11:36:31 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Narcotics we don't have a 1:00.
11:36:33 I'm reading it wrong.

11:36:34 >>GWEN MILLER: After lunch or what?
11:36:36 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Yes.
11:36:38 If we are definitely breaking for lunch.
11:36:39 And if we can finish before lunch, great.
11:36:42 If we go after lunch we do it then.
11:36:44 But we do it the same way so we have that flexibility.
11:36:47 >>GWEN MILLER: We need a motion then.
11:36:48 >>KEVIN WHITE: That's not a problem with their staff?
11:36:53 >>> I'm flexible.
11:37:03 >>THE CLERK: Did you set a public hearing for June
11:37:07 22nd, Central Park Village, also carrying over
11:37:10 item number 8 to June 22nd, transportation.
11:37:17 >>GWEN MILLER: I need a motion.
11:37:19 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Okay.
11:37:21 I make the motion for the end of the meeting,.
11:37:29 >>KEVIN WHITE: What about the meeting before that?
11:37:31 Did we not have enough time?
11:37:33 >>> I would not feel comfortable with you having all
11:37:35 the information you need in advance of the meeting.
11:37:37 >> What I can do to help, because I know the day is a
11:37:44 very busy day for you all, keep in mind that this is a
11:37:47 model element, what DCA needs to ensure is that the

11:37:52 local governments have seen the model before it's gone
11:37:54 to them.
11:37:55 And that they concur generally with the direction of
11:37:58 the model and interlocal agreement.
11:38:00 What we can do is make sure that they brief you and
11:38:07 know what the key elements are and really try to
11:38:10 expedite that, so it's less time.
11:38:13 One of the reasons why we continue to have the
11:38:15 workshop today, or kept it on schedule, is we knew we
11:38:18 were going to have more time to talk about some of
11:38:20 these issues with the intent, on the 22nd if you
11:38:24 come back and try to just let now what's changed or
11:38:26 what are the key outstanding items that we are going
11:38:29 to be transmitting up to DCA.
11:38:33 Again, DCA is going to take the document and use it
11:38:37 for other local jurisdictions.
11:38:39 So it's not a binding document for us.
11:38:41 We are going to continue to refine the model and bring
11:38:43 it back to a public hearings and approvals and
11:38:46 adoptions.
11:38:50 >>KEVIN WHITE: Mr. Goers, can we basically assume that
11:38:54 maybe a five-minute presentation?

11:38:58 If that's the case, we can make it for a time certain
11:39:00 and limit it to five minutes and just get them out of
11:39:03 here early and they can be done, if they can brief
11:39:06 council maybe the day or two before with the summary
11:39:10 sheet.
11:39:10 And then just do the presentation, if we can do it
11:39:13 five minutes.
11:39:15 Maybe toward the beginning of the meeting.
11:39:17 And then just be done it with rather than have them
11:39:20 have to stay here to the very end of the meeting, if
11:39:22 we can all agree.
11:39:26 >>GWEN MILLER: What time certain?
11:39:29 >> 9:30.
11:39:30 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: That's so unrealistic.
11:39:33 >>KEVIN WHITE: If it's five minutes if we have all
11:39:35 been briefed.
11:39:37 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Kennedy Boulevard --
11:39:44 >>KEVIN WHITE: If we can get most of our questions
11:39:46 answered.
11:39:48 >>> I can also make another suggestion.
11:39:50 We can do that, and if there are specific questions
11:39:55 council has.

11:39:56 What we are trying to do is meet DCA's requirement.
11:39:59 If you generally concur in the direction, wee week
11:40:02 have the follow-up, public workshop in July and then
11:40:05 transmit any follow-up items.
11:40:10 >>GWEN MILLER: Time certain 9:30.
11:40:12 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I have another idea.
11:40:15 What about 5:50 before City Council meeting?
11:40:24 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'm just concerned, council.
11:40:26 If it's a time certain, that council intends to stop
11:40:29 whatever it's doing at that time?
11:40:32 I just want to know because you always have public
11:40:35 hearings and I want to be clear that the order of
11:40:37 business is clear.
11:40:38 >>KEVIN WHITE: The time certain, what we have done,
11:40:40 Mr. Shelby, it just doesn't go before that time.
11:40:43 It can always go of a.
11:40:44 But it can't go before.
11:40:46 >>ROSE FERLITA: In all fairness, Mr. Shelby, to our
11:40:49 chairman, if she has a spot where she thinks she can
11:40:55 can't stop, she is going to have Ms. Duffey be here
11:41:02 for another two and a half hours.
11:41:03 I think we can flip that and get them done so they

11:41:06 don't have to stay any longer than they have to.
11:41:08 It might be right then.
11:41:11 It's not going to be an hour later.
11:41:13 Shouldn't be.
11:41:14 >> And that's way said for maximum of five minutes.
11:41:17 That would be my motion.
11:41:19 The 22nd, 9:30 time certain.
11:41:23 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: How do we know what the discussion
11:41:25 is going to be?
11:41:28 There still might be discussion.
11:41:29 >>MARY ALVAREZ: We know you will have discussion.
11:41:34 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Be part of the discussion.
11:41:36 >>ROSE FERLITA: We are hopeful it will be five
11:41:38 minutes.
11:41:38 If there's anybody that thinks it's so important to
11:41:41 discuss it might be longer than five.
11:41:45 >>KEVIN WHITE: This is going to be a workshop, not a
11:41:47 public hearing.
11:41:52 >>> If you are going to take official action it would
11:41:54 be my recommendation to allow the public to speak
11:41:56 first.
11:41:58 >>It's our workshop to you and get your feedback. And

11:42:03 from that we'll be able to transmit to DCA in the model
11:42:07 letting them know we presented to City Council.
11:42:10 Any concerns or concerns.
11:42:12 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: When does public give input?
11:42:15 >>MARY ALVAREZ: In July.
11:42:17 >>> When we go through the actual approval and
11:42:19 adoption of the element.
11:42:21 Again, it is a project to develop a model for the
11:42:26 Department of Community Affairs to use for other
11:42:29 jurisdictions.
11:42:29 We have developed just a framework to get it started
11:42:32 in the process and my guess is by the end --
11:42:38 identified framework, everything in place in terms of
11:42:42 how we want concurrency but there will be a lot of
11:42:46 discussions to work out with these four local
11:42:48 jurisdictions and the school board and how to move
11:42:50 forward.
11:42:51 So continue to have public comment.
11:42:57 >>ROSE FERLITA: So this is just to get our input, you
11:42:59 are supposed to do that as part of the process,
11:43:01 nothing to do with transmitting but confirms that we
11:43:05 have the opportunity --

11:43:06 >> It's not a transmittal of public hearing.
11:43:10 >> We have a motion and second for 9:30.
11:43:13 >> 9:35.
11:43:15 For five minutes.
11:43:17 >> All right.
11:43:20 All in favor of the motion say Aye.
11:43:21 Opposed, Nay.
11:43:23 >> Nay.
11:43:24 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you.
11:43:25 This is really important, guys.
11:43:26 And I think what we need to do is schedule an
11:43:30 opportunity to hear from the public, and action we
11:43:35 will take three weeks earlier on July on the 20th
11:43:38 we don't have an evening meeting.
11:43:39 I move that we schedule 10:00, a public discussion on
11:43:43 whatever we give on the 22nd.
11:43:46 Because we need to have an opportunity.
11:43:48 You are probably will have more information.
11:43:51 We need to give the public a chance to weigh in on it.
11:43:54 It's going to affect development in the city and I
11:43:56 think it's really important.
11:43:56 I move that we schedule a public discussion on this

11:44:01 school policy thing on the 20th at 10:00.
11:44:06 20th of July.
11:44:07 10:00.
11:44:11 >>CHAIRMAN: Motion dies for lack of second.
11:44:13 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I think it's pretty outrageous that
11:44:17 we are not having an opportunity for the public --
11:44:21 >>> Let me, if I could, getting back to the process.
11:44:24 The process involves public comment through public
11:44:27 stakeholders committee, which has been comprised of
11:44:32 citizens, property owners, developers, people that
11:44:36 have been feeding into the process, to make
11:44:40 recommendations or be considered, as well as the
11:44:43 Executive Committee.
11:44:44 So there has been a fair amount of discussion from
11:44:49 different aspects to bring --
11:44:58 >>GWEN MILLER: Okay.
11:44:59 Thank you.
11:45:05 I asked if anybody had any questions.
11:45:07 We already talked about impact fee.
11:45:10 You talked about it.
11:45:20 We talked about it already.
11:45:22 Okay.

11:45:24 Information from council members?
11:45:26 And then executive order.
11:45:30 I am going to go first.
11:45:31 I want to do a commendation to Ms. Brittany Boone.
11:45:38 Ms. Boone is the young lady who called 911 when the
11:45:42 officer got shot, and she stayed there.
11:45:56 I don't know whether the guy got caught or not.
11:45:59 >>> Killed him.
11:46:00 >> I would like --
11:46:06 I have a motion and second.
11:46:07 All in favor of the motion say Aye.
11:46:09 (Motion carried)
11:46:12 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: This is in the local newspaper.
11:46:28 And in an article about making sense -- basically, I
11:46:40 wanted to show it to council.
11:46:44 I talked about this before.
11:46:45 And I think it's really important that we do something
11:46:51 I hate to follow Pinellas but it appears they might
11:46:53 have had the idea first.
11:46:54 I think that in storm surge areas --
11:46:57 >>> Use the hand held Mike, please.
11:46:59 We can't hear you.

11:47:00 >> Identify myself?
11:47:01 I think in storm surge areas we should have these type
11:47:03 of signs where people are extremely aware on a
11:47:07 day-to-day basis especially in the summertime in
11:47:09 hurricane season that they know what these storm
11:47:13 surges means, what it means to have a ten-foot tidal
11:47:17 surge over the top of that lady's head, and that's
11:47:19 only a category 2 storm.
11:47:21 You know, it could be off-shore.
11:47:28 Over Pinellas.
11:47:29 And still have that tidal surge coming into the bay
11:47:32 and flooding the area.
11:47:33 So with that wonderful illustration, I am going to
11:47:37 make a motion to ask a report back from our public
11:47:40 works department and see how much that would cost and
11:47:44 the feasibility of that, in 30 days.
11:47:48 >> Second.
11:47:48 >>GWEN MILLER: Motion and second.
11:47:49 (Motion carried)
11:47:53 Anything else, Mr. Dingfelder?
11:47:54 Ms. Saul-Sena?
11:47:55 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you.

11:47:56 Next week we are having a presentation for
11:48:00 sustainability group.
11:48:01 And I would like to request that city staff, Ohio
11:48:05 assume are going to be coming who will be here anyway,
11:48:08 give us a brief report, it can be written on whether
11:48:13 green roofs, a way of having buildings more
11:48:25 sustainable.
11:48:26 So the question is do we allow green roofs?
11:48:29 And secondly, as requested in three weeks, we get a
11:48:34 response on whether we can look at having a green roof
11:48:37 on.
11:48:38 The biggest roof that needs replacement.
11:48:40 And county save us a lot of money in the long run.
11:48:48 >>> Yes or no, do we allow green roofs, in three weeks
11:48:52 have a report, working on whether we can consider that
11:48:56 for the convention center which means if you get state
11:48:59 and federal money to help reroof.
11:49:03 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Is there something urgent, you said
11:49:05 next week?
11:49:06 >> Just because it's on our agenda to talk about
11:49:08 sustainability.
11:49:09 One of the things on sustainability was green roof.

11:49:11 And they don't have to do a report, they can just say
11:49:14 "yes" or "no."
11:49:15 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Second.
11:49:16 (Motion carried).
11:49:17 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Harrison?
11:49:20 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Thank you, Madam Chair.
11:49:22 As we go into our budget cycle for this year, I would
11:49:25 like to us consider something that I don't think this
11:49:28 council has ever considered, and that is a reduction
11:49:31 in our ad valorem taxes for the City of Tampa.
11:49:35 We often have seen how much more it costs just to live
11:49:40 anymore.
11:49:41 Actually, there was a great article in the Tribune
11:49:44 earlier this week, rising costs sink area budgets.
11:49:48 It talked about how much everything in life has gone
11:49:51 up.
11:49:52 And I have never, at least in my eight years on
11:49:55 council, no one has ever seriously discussed the idea
11:49:58 of a reduction in ad valorem taxes.
11:50:01 We have held the line.
11:50:02 And that's been a great thing.
11:50:04 But we have never talked about going in reverse area.

11:50:07 So what I would like to do is schedule for two weeks a
11:50:11 discussion on the possibility of lowering our
11:50:14 ad valorem tax revenue, or ad valorem tax rate in the
11:50:17 City of Tampa.
11:50:19 I believe -- and I don't have any -- I want council to
11:50:24 discuss it and it needs to happen before the budget
11:50:27 cycle starts so that we can have input from the
11:50:30 administration, and see if this something they would
11:50:33 be willing to go along with.
11:50:35 I'm not thinking about anything radical.
11:50:36 Something in the neighborhood of a 2% reduction would
11:50:41 not break the bank as far as what our needs are in the
11:50:45 city, and I think it would be meaningful and a gesture
11:50:51 to our citizens that we understand what everybody is
11:50:56 going through with the price of gas and the price of
11:50:59 insurance, and the price of new homes.
11:51:03 Affordable housing is a very timely topic right now.
11:51:06 And if we see that affordable housing is something
11:51:09 that really is out of reach for many of our citizens.
11:51:13 And this would be our opportunity to say, we know what
11:51:16 you're going through, and we are going to try to
11:51:19 respond.

11:51:19 So schedule that for discussion in two weeks.
11:51:22 We would like the administration to come and give
11:51:24 their thoughts on it.
11:51:34 >>GWEN MILLER: Motion and second.
11:51:35 Question on the motion.
11:51:36 >>ROSE FERLITA: I just want to make a comment.
11:51:39 Should I do it now?
11:51:40 Mr. Harrison is right.
11:51:41 Wave not looked at reducing the millage forever.
11:51:44 Last year going through the budget conversations, when
11:51:46 somebody said it was a wonderful budget, because the
11:51:49 mayor was not raising the millage.
11:51:51 And I made a comment, I remember as if it was
11:51:53 yesterday, she's not raising it but she's not lowering
11:51:56 it either.
11:51:57 And I think it hasn't been lowered since Sandy
11:51:59 Freedman 17 years ago, et cetera.
11:52:02 So I certainly support this concept and this attitude
11:52:04 about decreasing the millage.
11:52:06 The details, I guess, will be in the mix when we do
11:52:08 have a discussion that'salities more comprehensive.
11:52:11 But let me add something to what Mr. Harrison is

11:52:13 saying because I think it's very important.
11:52:15 First of all we have experienced a very robust
11:52:17 increase in property tax revenue, due to increased
11:52:20 valuations.
11:52:22 That's an additional source of revenue that came on
11:52:24 board 5'5" years ago.
11:52:27 Get morgue gas tax revenue.
11:52:30 Many if not all of our fees were raised for services,
11:52:33 solid waste, parking, water, stormwater utility tax
11:52:36 was doubled.
11:52:37 So I think it's a fine time.
11:52:38 I think it's overdue to look at rolling back the
11:52:42 ad valorem tax a little bit.
11:52:43 And I do want to say that that I think it's wonderful
11:52:46 to have a plan or discussion or proposal.
11:52:48 But at the same time, it has to have to kind of make
11:52:51 sense.
11:52:52 As we go through with the administration's approval or
11:52:54 not, it doesn't matter what they say, I'm saying that
11:52:57 I think it's a good idea and I support Mr. Harrison's
11:53:01 suggestion.
11:53:01 We don't want to do something because we want to look

11:53:05 conservative, and at the same time jeopardize the
11:53:08 services that we give our constituents.
11:53:10 Certainly, we need to reduce it but we sure don't need
11:53:14 to look at the budget and reduce in the areas of
11:53:16 public safety.
11:53:17 I think we are all on board saying that's the place we
11:53:19 don't want to cut.
11:53:20 And if we wanted to do something that was instrumental
11:53:23 and demonstrative of what we want to do about getting
11:53:27 some relief to our citizens, I think I will leave this
11:53:30 in your minds, colleagues, as we go on with Mr.
11:53:33 Harrison's suggestion to discuss it further.
11:53:35 If we want to reduce the millage, we need to look at
11:53:38 areas that I think we need to look at primarily.
11:53:40 I think it's been talked about by either Ellen, and I
11:53:48 know we had the articles about salaries, et cetera.
11:53:51 I think the administration ought to consider again the
11:53:53 organizational chart.
11:53:54 In the last four to five years, I think it's too fat
11:53:57 at the top.
11:53:58 If we want to appear back our taxes I think the
11:54:03 message would be very clear if we are serious about

11:54:05 this, that's the place we need to look at as we do our
11:54:08 homework in anticipation of his plan.
11:54:11 Millage has not been cut back as I said since 17 years
11:54:16 ago.
11:54:16 And I think it was after the mayor had sent in her
11:54:20 suggestion in terms of setting the millage rate to
11:54:24 Ralph Turner's office and dealt with the trim issues.
11:54:26 Awl so although I understand, it is still possible,
11:54:29 once we go through the budget process, to go back and
11:54:32 still change that if we are lowering it, gosh, it
11:54:35 makes a L heck of a lot more common sense to look at
11:54:37 this very comprehensively and talk about reducing the
11:54:40 millage before Pam submits to the Mr. Turner's office.
11:54:46 I not only support that attitude, I wholeheartedly
11:54:48 support that attitude.
11:54:49 I think it's time.
11:54:50 It's long overdue.
11:54:52 The county has done some of that.
11:54:53 And I think that's one of the times that following
11:54:55 their lead, also allows to us look like leaders.
11:54:58 So I'm looking forward to that discussion and
11:55:00 supporting the Dee decrease in that millage rate.

11:55:03 Mr. Harrison, thank you for bringing it up.
11:55:06 >>DAVID SMITH: City attorney.
11:55:07 I heard Mr. Harrison's suggestion and Ms. Ferlita's
11:55:11 support.
11:55:12 The only thing I'm concerned about, I would caution
11:55:14 you that we need to do this in a manner that's
11:55:17 consistent with the charter process.
11:55:19 And I can't tell you today exactly what that is.
11:55:21 I know that generally this is in the context of the
11:55:25 budget.
11:55:26 I know Mrs. Ferlita set a concern about setting
11:55:28 millage, and I'm not sure what the time is, whether
11:55:30 that occurs too early in the processor not.
11:55:33 But charter contemplates clearly that council is the
11:55:38 legislative branch.
11:55:39 That includes revenue as well as costs.
11:55:41 So I think it is certainly something that is within
11:55:44 the purview of council.
11:55:46 I would like to look at the charter and provide you
11:55:49 some guidance in terms of the process you may want to
11:55:53 employ, that is consistent with the charter.
11:55:55 And I think I understand what you're saying.

11:55:57 I just want to make sure that we do this -- that do
11:55:59 you this in a manner that's consistent with those
11:56:02 requirements.
11:56:02 I can't tell dah what those are.
11:56:04 >>ROSE FERLITA: Mr. Smith, I appreciate that.
11:56:07 Because this is about collecting data and Mr. Harrison
11:56:09 brought it up and the rest us had the opportunity to
11:56:11 weigh in on it.
11:56:12 That would help immensely.
11:56:13 We know that we have the ability to do that or not
11:56:16 approve the budget as is and as presented.
11:56:18 But I think we are going to be a little -- hopefully
11:56:20 we will be a little more proactive.
11:56:23 But what helps that process, Dave, if you wouldn't
11:56:26 mind, giving us the process that wave to follow.
11:56:31 What we have to do, when did K we do it if we decide
11:56:34 to do it?
11:56:35 And that will all weigh in on the conversation that we
11:56:37 are going to have.
11:56:37 So hopefully we have a beneficial product from that
11:56:40 discussion that will help our constituents.
11:56:43 Thank you so much.

11:56:45 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I attended a budget workshop about
11:56:47 a week ago with Ms. Alvarez and Mr. White.
11:56:50 And it was very sobering.
11:56:53 Like my colleagues, it seamed to me with all the
11:56:55 building that's going on in Tampa that we are going to
11:56:57 have a windfall in tax money.
11:57:01 The significant information that I didn't realize
11:57:03 until I attended that workshop is that the city is
11:57:08 essentially self-insured when it comes to hurricanes.
11:57:11 We don't have policies that cover our major buildings
11:57:16 that are vulnerable to hurricanes.
11:57:18 It's sort of appropriate after Mr. Dingfelder's
11:57:20 comment on storm surges.
11:57:22 We have to begin to develop an endowment to protect
11:57:27 ourselves in case of hurricanes.
11:57:28 And when I reflect on the true meaning of the word
11:57:33 "conservative" it means to protect.
11:57:36 And I think that the responsible thing for us to do as
11:57:39 the city, recognizing our vulnerability in terms of
11:57:44 hurricanes, is to put money aside, in a way over the
11:57:48 next five years, to create this safe endowment.
11:57:54 I respect you, Mr. Harrison.

11:57:55 And I think you are a careful thinker.
11:57:58 I think this is -- this is a symbolic gesture that is
11:58:07 not as responsible as we need to be as a city.
11:58:11 And therefore I will not support the motion, because I
11:58:13 think any additional revenues we have as a city, we
11:58:20 should use conservatively, in the truest sense of the
11:58:23 word, to protect ourselves against potential disaster.
11:58:27 Today is the first day of hurricane season.
11:58:29 I think we are all keenly aware of it.
11:58:32 And I will just go through the list.
11:58:34 The Aquarium is city owned.
11:58:37 The Convention Center.
11:58:38 The Performing Arts Center. The museum.
11:58:41 As well as our -- specifically on the water in harm's
11:58:47 way.
11:58:47 And in the last two years, if you all saw the
11:58:49 information that we saw at this meeting, our coverage
11:58:53 went from paying $3 million a year for $500 million of
11:58:57 coverage to $3 million a year for $30 million worth of
11:59:01 coverage.
11:59:02 That isn't enough to begin to cover our cities assets.
11:59:06 So that's why we responsibly have to begin to create

11:59:09 this endowment, to protect our public investment.
11:59:15 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: And we all have our own different
11:59:19 styles.
11:59:20 I sent an e-mail to the administration about a month
11:59:23 ago asking the question.
11:59:26 I said we have looked at it.
11:59:28 It's been 18 years or something.
11:59:31 Why don't we consider rolling back the millage, just
11:59:35 some small part, just so we can show the people we
11:59:38 care?
11:59:39 In response to that, I got a lot of information.
11:59:42 And Mrs. Saul-Sena just related to council about the
11:59:47 building up the contingency fund, the higher costs of
11:59:50 insurance, other hurricane preparedness issues,
11:59:53 construction costs which have been rising for all of
11:59:56 our projects, and the increase in gasoline costs.
12:00:01 What is it, for every penny of gas, the city pays 100
12:00:07 that you.
12:00:08 26,000.
12:00:09 So those are the types of things that Bonnie explained
12:00:13 to me very courteously and professionally as to why
12:00:16 she didn't feel it would be responsible necessarily to

12:00:19 do that.
12:00:23 So I let it go at that time.
12:00:25 However, I seconded this T motion just now because I
12:00:28 think it's important for us to have that dialogue.
12:00:30 Not only us, but for the community to hear that
12:00:34 discussion.
12:00:35 And there's nothing wrong with that.
12:00:36 And Ms. Saul-Sena, you're always up for dialogue and
12:00:39 discussion.
12:00:39 And I think that's the intent of the motion.
12:00:42 Ms. Ferlita and Mr. Harrison aren't saying we are
12:00:45 going to change anything today.
12:00:46 But I think what they are saying is look at these
12:00:49 issues, let's explore these issues, let's have Bonnie
12:00:51 stand in front of us, and we can talk about it for
12:00:54 more than five minutes, and as much time as we need
12:00:59 to.
12:00:59 And that's why I'm supportive of the motion.
12:01:03 And I'm going to keep an open mind on this issue.
12:01:06 Because if we can roll back the property taxes, then
12:01:09 we should.
12:01:09 And if we shouldn't, then we shouldn't.

12:01:13 >>MARY ALVAREZ: I was at that meeting like Mrs.
12:01:17 Saul-Sena said.
12:01:17 And the estimated budget that they were talking about
12:01:20 was the same as last year, $674 million.
12:01:24 We, from the ad valorem tax, we only get a little bit
12:01:27 more than 26% for the ad valorem.
12:01:32 All that money that we get from there goes to the
12:01:35 police and fire budget.
12:01:37 So how can we even think about doing that?
12:01:41 Yes, a lot of stuff is coming in.
12:01:43 But we are still held back by what Ms. Saul-Sena said.
12:01:50 We have contingency fees.
12:01:52 We are self-insured.
12:01:53 Our policies went down to $30 million.
12:01:56 That doesn't cover anything.
12:02:01 Aquarium insurance, they can't even afford to do that.
12:02:03 So we are talking about rolling back millage?
12:02:09 I'm sorry, I won't be able to support, not even a
12:02:12 discussion about it.
12:02:13 Because it's not prudent at this time.
12:02:15 Construction costs are going up.
12:02:18 And market values are going up, too.

12:02:20 It's just not the time to do this.
12:02:22 So I won't support that.
12:02:26 >>ROSE FERLITA: Mr. Dingfelder, I appreciate your
12:02:27 comments because I think we are talking about a
12:02:29 discuss to -- discussion to see if this is possible or
12:02:32 not and I think it is.
12:02:33 I think if we cut back in the appropriate place that
12:02:35 is we can do it. The short and the long is this:
12:02:38 Concentrate on necessary things.
12:02:40 Eliminate the pretty things and give our constituents
12:02:43 some relief.
12:02:45 I am very much in favor of reducing the millage.
12:02:48 I think it's appropriate and it's timely.
12:02:52 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Madam Chair, I'm glad that we had
12:02:56 enough foresight as to what we might expect in two
12:02:58 weeks. This is a healthy discussion.
12:03:00 And I appreciate Mr. Dingfelder's support.
12:03:02 And we'll see where it goes.
12:03:06 Again, not one of us wants to be irresponsible with
12:03:09 the city's budget.
12:03:10 And we're not talking about radical change.
12:03:14 I wouldn't support radical change.

12:03:16 We can't endanger the public safety of the people who
12:03:19 live here.
12:03:20 But if there are places where we can trim back, we can
12:03:24 tighten our belts, we should explore that.
12:03:26 And Ms. Ferlita said it.
12:03:28 We have raised every fee -- when I say we, I mean
12:03:32 collectively, this group, not everyone on this
12:03:34 board -- every fee that can possibly have been raised
12:03:37 has been raised within the last couple of years.
12:03:39 And is it now an opportunity for to us say to every
12:03:44 person that lives in this city, we understand it's
12:03:48 more expensive and we are here to try to help.
12:03:51 And we'll see where the discussion goes.
12:03:53 I look forward to it and hopefully will have a few
12:03:56 people in the audience that want to weigh in on this,
12:03:58 too.
12:03:58 And we are doing it well enough in advance so that
12:04:03 Bonnie and the mayor and the administration has a
12:04:06 chance to thoughtfully respond.
12:04:08 And if council says in two weeks' time, we think it's
12:04:13 a good idea, and here's what we think the millage
12:04:15 ought to be rolled back to, that gives everybody an

12:04:18 opportunity to plan through the summer, as we go
12:04:20 through our budget hearings.
12:04:21 If we say, now what?
12:04:23 We just can't do it.
12:04:24 Then we can't do it.
12:04:25 But at least we had that discussion and we owe it to
12:04:28 everybody in the city to have that discussion.
12:04:29 >>GWEN MILLER: Motion and second.
12:04:31 Mr. Shelby.
12:04:31 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Just curious if council would make a
12:04:37 motion to have this on the agenda.
12:04:38 >>SHAWN HARRISON: It's two weeks.
12:04:39 What is it?
12:04:40 >>MARTIN SHELBY: At what point in the agenda?
12:04:44 >>SHAWN HARRISON: What are we looking like as far as
12:04:46 our --
12:04:51 >>MARY ALVAREZ: While they are looking at this, let me
12:04:54 just add to this.
12:04:58 We have always gone to the department heads and we
12:05:00 have always had unfunded budget requests.
12:05:03 How can we even think about doing anything like that
12:05:05 when we can't even fund whatever we have, especially

12:05:09 transportation, the stormwater?
12:05:10 Of course we have gone up on the fees and all.
12:05:13 But we still have problems with that.
12:05:15 We have problems in every department.
12:05:17 With all the costs that are coming in with the
12:05:20 gasoline, and you mentioned that, Mr. Dingfelder.
12:05:23 Gasoline prices are over the roof.
12:05:27 And the parks and everything we are putting out there
12:05:31 is just costing a lot more.
12:05:34 This is just not the time to be messing around with
12:05:38 budget cuts -- or not cuts, but the millage cuts.
12:05:43 I just can't see where it's coming from.
12:05:45 It's just not a good time to do this.
12:05:50 >>SHAWN HARRISON: I don't have any time certain.
12:05:52 We'll put it on for discussion during the regular
12:05:54 meeting.
12:05:55 >>GWEN MILLER: Okay.
12:05:56 We have a motion and second.
12:05:57 >>THE CLERK: Saul-Sena and Alvarez no.
12:06:04 >>SHAWN HARRISON: That's all.
12:06:06 >>GWEN MILLER: Mrs. Alvarez?
12:06:07 >>MARY ALVAREZ: I would like to set a --

12:06:12 >>ROSE FERLITA: Public hearing to raise the millage.
12:06:14 [~Laughter~]
12:06:19 I'm sorry, Mary.
12:06:24 >>MARY ALVAREZ: I don't think I deserved that.
12:06:31 Set a CRA meeting for June 8th at 8:45.
12:06:38 >>GWEN MILLER: You all have to be here now.
12:06:40 We have a motion and second.
12:06:41 (Motion carried)
12:06:43 Anything else?
12:06:44 >>MARY ALVAREZ: No.
12:06:44 >>ROSE FERLITA: One quick thing that comes up every so
12:06:47 often, goes away and comes back and goes away and
12:06:49 comes back.
12:06:51 I think this is definitely a public safety issue, the
12:06:54 issue with you the boats sitting abandoned and people
12:06:57 use it as their homes, and decide to dump their waste
12:07:00 off the side of the boats.
12:07:01 I went out there because a lady complained.
12:07:03 And I just want to pass these around to you all.
12:07:06 That's kind of a nice shot compared to some of the
12:07:08 other shots.
12:07:09 But I never have gotten a good feel about B

12:07:13 jurisdiction, if it's the port authority, is it the
12:07:15 city?
12:07:15 And somebody that came almost close that was near and
12:07:18 dear to my heart to giving us some sort of a
12:07:21 direction.
12:07:23 Mr. Morris Massey, I could kill him for leaving but
12:07:25 anyway he's gone.
12:07:26 Don't even know who to direct that to in legal.
12:07:28 But somebody needs to let us know what's going on.
12:07:34 >> Administration.
12:07:35 >>GWEN MILLER: Some.
12:07:37 Are they being used?
12:07:39 >>ROSE FERLITA: No, some of them ar ban donned.
12:07:41 Some people are living on them.
12:07:43 And their human waste off the side.
12:07:44 It is a public safety issue.
12:07:50 >> It's more than five or six.
12:07:53 >>ROSE FERLITA: With that being said, I would like to
12:07:55 have the administration come back in a week and tell
12:07:57 me where we are with this, why do two weeks?
12:08:00 This is not a big issue.
12:08:02 They have a ton of that already, Mr. Shelby.

12:08:04 This lady was just aggravated.
12:08:06 She said every time I see, what happens?
12:08:08 You say, yeah, yeah, yeah, one week is fine.
12:08:11 And if one week they can't give us a real
12:08:13 comprehensive answer then they can come back in the
12:08:15 second week.
12:08:16 That issue has been around longer than you have been
12:08:18 here.
12:08:19 My motion is to not just support it.
12:08:22 You know how that goes.
12:08:23 But I would like something from transportation, be
12:08:27 whoever is in charge of this, legal or whatever.
12:08:29 It is a public safety issue.
12:08:31 Tell us what we can do.
12:08:33 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Let me just say this one more time
12:08:35 and I promise I won't ever again.
12:08:36 Ever.
12:08:37 Because you are all together here, all seven, the
12:08:39 administration has asked as a standing policy --
12:08:44 >>ROSE FERLITA: I know what you're saying.
12:08:46 >>> I am not going to play it again.
12:08:48 You council members are aware.

12:08:49 I am under no further obligation to understand it.
12:08:52 Each council member knows full well what the
12:08:54 administration's request is and I'm done everything --
12:08:57 >>ROSE FERLITA: And I appreciate the explanation.
12:08:59 I have heard it before.
12:09:00 But there's nothing so complicated they can't give me
12:09:02 an answer in a week.
12:09:03 And if they want to expand, that's like the miracle
12:09:06 rule, says council, don't you dare ask for anything in
12:09:11 response in less than two weeks.
12:09:13 Why?
12:09:13 Is that a policy?
12:09:15 No.
12:09:15 A week is fine.
12:09:16 It's been around a long time.
12:09:17 All somebody has to do upstairs, across the hall, is
12:09:20 to go look at the data in this file and let us know
12:09:23 what we are doing, again, one week is ample as far as
12:09:26 I'm concerned.
12:09:27 It is a public safety issue.
12:09:28 Go out there.
12:09:29 And see what people dump off.

12:09:37 >> We have a motion and second.
12:09:42 >>KEVIN WHITE: You're absolutely right, that's what
12:09:45 the administration has requested, two weeks.
12:09:46 But so has this council requested time and time and
12:09:50 time again that we get our information from in a
12:09:55 timely chance.
12:10:01 Whenever they have the opportunity I'm sure they do.
12:10:03 But more often than not we get our information at the
12:10:05 last minute and our request to as a body make a
12:10:08 decision in little or no time.
12:10:10 So I don't think a week is anything that's too short
12:10:14 order.
12:10:17 In this particular case.
12:10:33 >> On Monday, June 5th, we'll be having the
12:10:38 enterprise department reviews, on Monday, we will also
12:10:44 be going over police, fire, and parks and recreation,
12:10:48 Monday, July 17th we will be talking about code
12:10:50 enforcement, clean city, public works.
12:10:53 Monday, July 24th, reserves pensions, property
12:10:56 insurance, health insurance, and others.
12:11:00 The other request I would have as far as council
12:11:02 members if we want to talk about the City Council

12:11:07 budget specifically, we need to put that on
12:11:09 whatever -- whichever one of these four dates that I'm
12:11:13 going to assume the great majority of cuss be there.
12:11:16 So if we could just look at these dates and maybe come
12:11:19 back the first part of next week.
12:11:22 And figure out one of those last three dates.
12:11:25 I'm assuming maybe public safety time.
12:11:29 I don't know, whichever is most convenient for
12:11:33 everybody when the majority of us can attend.
12:11:35 We want to put that up front.
12:11:39 If your time is limited.
12:11:46 >>MARY ALVAREZ: I would like for the review on the
12:11:56 unfunded requests.
12:11:58 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I think they start at 9 a.m.
12:12:04 >> 9 a.m. on the fifth floor.
12:12:06 >> And I know everybody has their own schedules.
12:12:11 We might be interested in starting at 8:30.
12:12:13 >> No.
12:12:15 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Can you make it at 8:30?
12:12:18 >> Mr. Dingfelder can't get downtown at 8:30 from New
12:12:21 Tampa.
12:12:22 >> I respect that.

12:12:23 >> Can you get up at five?
12:12:25 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: That's fine.
12:12:31 >>GWEN MILLER: Anything else?
12:12:32 >>KEVIN WHITE: That's going to be it.
12:12:36 Get with me next week and find out about the budget in
12:12:40 particular.
12:12:40 >> Move to receive and file.
12:12:42 >> Second.
12:12:42 (Motion carried).
12:12:44 >>THE CLERK: Council received a memorandum from Steve
12:12:48 Daignault who schedule a workshop on south of Gandy
12:12:54 transportation study.
12:12:56 Requesting 90 minutes.
12:13:00 >> Let me talk to Steve between now and next week and
12:13:03 see if we can do that after our break.
12:13:06 >>MARY ALVAREZ: That will be good.
12:13:16 >>THE CLERK: We have a letter from Hartline, from Ray
12:13:22 Geller.
12:13:22 He would like to appear before council before we take
12:13:25 the summer break and vacation to talk about the
12:13:28 advantages of having a bus shelter advertising

12:13:30 program.
12:13:33 Anticipating a ten minute PowerPoint presentation and
12:13:37 would like to be scheduled before council.
12:13:42 >>MARY ALVAREZ: How about the 22nd?
12:13:44 [~Laughter~]
12:13:45 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: A workshop the week after we get
12:13:48 back.
12:13:48 >>GWEN MILLER: He said before your break.
12:13:53 >> What does he want to talk about?
12:13:55 >> The bus shelters.
12:13:57 >> How about the 8th at the beginning of the
12:14:00 meeting.
12:14:01 >> That's next week.
12:14:02 >> Sure.
12:14:03 And tell him to make it five minutes.
12:14:07 And 10:00 for five minutes.
12:14:15 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Second.
12:14:15 (Motion carried).
12:14:17 >>THE CLERK: That's all I have.
12:14:20 >> Move to receive and file.
12:14:21 >>CHAIRMAN: We have done that.
12:14:22 Mr. Shelby, do you have anything?

12:14:32 We stand adjourned.
12:14:33 (Meeting adjourned)