Help & information    View the list of Transcripts

City of Tampa
Tampa City Council
Thursday, July 20, 2006

The following represents an unedited version of
realtime captioning which should neither be relied
upon for complete accuracy nor used as a verbatim
The original of this transcript was produced in all
capital letters and any variation thereto may be a
result of third party edits and software compatibility
Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the
proceedings may need to hire a court reporter.

09:11:00 [Sounding gavel]
09:11:02 >>GWEN MILLER: Tampa City Council is called to order.
09:11:09 The chair will yield to Mr. John Dingfelder.
09:11:13 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Thank you, Madam Chair.
09:11:15 Rise for the invocation.
09:11:16 And followed by the pledge of allegiance.
09:11:19 And I'm giving the invocation today.
09:11:25 Basically what I would like to say is have us bow our
09:11:28 heads and have a moment of silence.
09:11:30 While we do that, I want us to remember our troops in
09:11:33 the mideast and also to remember all the folks in the
09:11:35 mideast and the conflicts that are going on there.
09:11:37 Let's pray for peace.
09:11:41 (moment of silence)
09:11:59 Thank you.
09:11:59 (Pledge of Allegiance)
09:12:12 >>GWEN MILLER: Roll call.
09:12:15 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Here.
09:12:19 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Here.
09:12:21 >>ROSE FERLITA: Here.
09:12:24 >>KEVIN WHITE: Here.
09:12:25 >>GWEN MILLER: Here.
09:12:26 Before we begin our meeting I would like to welcome
09:12:29 back my aide Libby Wilson back to work.
09:12:33 During summer break she was in a car accident and
09:12:35 suffered a broken collar broken, fractured back and
09:12:39 neck and mild concussion.
09:12:41 Thank God she will still with be with us because she
09:12:44 is a valuable asset to this office.
09:12:46 Now I would like to yield to Ms. Rose Ferlita.
09:12:52 >>ROSE FERLITA:
09:13:09 >>ROSE FERLITA: I'm joined by the chief and fellow
09:13:11 officers.
09:13:13 I want to make a deal with you.
09:13:15 If I can pronounce Wasierski, maybe you can pronounce
09:13:21 Ferlita.
09:13:22 >>GWEN MILLER: It sounds good.
09:13:25 I don't want to change it.
09:13:26 >> As always, good morning, ladies and gentlemen,
09:13:30 colleagues, my pleasure to begin the Officer of the
09:13:33 Month ceremony by harassing my chairman.
09:13:38 So we will move forward to the rest of the business.
09:13:41 It is my pleasure to help Chief Hogue and Chief Castor
09:13:47 to say thank you to the men and women who do such an
09:13:51 incredible job at TPD and you are the gentleman we
09:13:55 would like to recognize today. Not a job I would want
09:13:58 to pick you over some of the other wonderful men and
09:14:00 women as well.
09:14:01 At this point I will let the chief give a little
09:14:05 information about you and why he chose you.
09:14:11 >>CHIEF HOGUE: Good morning, council.

09:14:12 Once again I do appreciate the fact that Rose and the
09:14:16 council recognize a police officer each month.
09:14:21 It means a lot to every officer there.
09:14:24 Not only they get it or don't get it but the fact that
09:14:27 officers are being recognized.
09:14:29 And this month, we have officer Wasierski who was our
09:14:36 Officer of the Month for July 2006.
09:14:38 Officer comes to us from another agency so he brought
09:14:42 about five years worth of experience.
09:14:44 When he came.
09:14:45 He's been what us about three years now.
09:14:49 In fact, when I came back here, him and I went through
09:14:52 the physical together.
09:14:53 He did a little better than I did.
09:14:56 That's to be expected.
09:14:58 But the reason that we picked him for Officer of the
09:15:02 Month, we had several incidents occur that he was
09:15:05 involved in that were exemplary in nature, and so I
09:15:10 would like to go through some of those.
09:15:11 First off, he started off this month by making a
09:15:15 routine traffic stop, which is good practical police
09:15:19 work, and during that time the suspect immediately

09:15:24 fled from the car.
09:15:25 So Eric, being a pretty productive guy, figured
09:15:31 something was up.
09:15:31 So he ran this individual down, and not only was he --
09:15:36 had traffic violations that he was arrested for, but
09:15:39 also for felony possession of marijuana.
09:15:43 A couple of days later, he gets a call to an auto
09:15:48 theft suspect in the area.
09:15:50 He goes over.
09:15:52 He recovers the stolen car that the auto thief has
09:15:57 abandoned in the area.
09:15:58 He then, through extra effort, tracks down the auto
09:16:04 thief, where he's fled to, arrests him, and then in a
09:16:08 little bit of an unusual move, he decided, well, let
09:16:13 me look the area around, because sometimes they drop a
09:16:15 stolen car and pick up a new stolen car.
09:16:18 And sure enough he found another stolen car that the
09:16:21 suspect had dropped in the area, and also was able to
09:16:24 charge him with that.
09:16:26 Another incident in that same month, he checked on a
09:16:33 sexual offender.
09:16:34 I think it was involving a child.

09:16:36 And he was under probation and went by to make sure
09:16:41 that this individual was evaluated by his probation.
09:16:45 Through some investigative techniques he found out
09:16:47 this individual had some child pornographer on his
09:16:50 computer, rearrested him and got him back in jail and
09:16:54 off of the streets of Tampa.
09:16:56 One last incident.
09:17:01 There was an ATV around the streets driving
09:17:05 recklessly, and Eric goes to pull it over, and I guess
09:17:09 if you can call at pursuit with an ATV, chased him
09:17:13 down, he ran off, the suspect did, once again.
09:17:16 Eric tracked him down in the neighborhood and found
09:17:18 him hiding in a house and arrested him.
09:17:21 In addition to all of this, he is in our field
09:17:25 training program, and he trains new officers, which is
09:17:30 a very valuable service that he is providing to the
09:17:35 department and to the citizens, because it's a very
09:17:39 difficult job.
09:17:40 It's kind of akin to you having somebody sitting next
09:17:43 to you up there, and you have to train them all about
09:17:47 being a council person.
09:17:49 Just about the time they can make do some notes for

09:17:52 you and do something a little bit on their own,
09:17:54 somebody takes that person away and gives you somebody
09:17:56 that doesn't know anything, and you start all over
09:17:58 again.
09:17:58 So it's always a process and it's always more
09:18:01 difficult to train and work with the at the same time.
09:18:04 So the fact that he can train and produce like he does
09:18:07 is phenomenal.
09:18:09 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: For three years now.
09:18:20 >>> And just kind of in closing, as in most of our
09:18:23 officers of the month, it's not any one particular
09:18:28 month.
09:18:28 We just happened to pick this particular month, and
09:18:31 the things that hit in this month.
09:18:34 Because really he is being recognized as Officer of
09:18:37 the Month for his work ethic that he does every month
09:18:40 of every year.
09:18:41 This is just typical of the kind of work he does every
09:18:43 month.
09:18:44 So we are very proud to announce that Eric is our
09:18:48 Officer of the Month.
09:18:49 And thank you very much.

09:18:50 [ Applause ]
09:19:01 >>ROSE FERLITA: You sure have enough information to be
09:19:03 a little cocky.
09:19:06 That stuff is pretty good, that work ethic doesn't
09:19:09 allow that.
09:19:10 You are modest and we appreciate your commitment to
09:19:12 TPD and to us.
09:19:14 I'd like to read this commendation to you on behalf of
09:19:18 everybody that I represent.
09:19:20 And at that point, maybe you can introduce your
09:19:23 girlfriend and your parents who are certainly your
09:19:26 foundation in terms of being behind and supporting you
09:19:28 for everything you do for us.
09:19:31 So that being said, it is my pleasure as public safety
09:19:35 chairman to present this to you, Eric.
09:19:37 Tampa City Council commendation presented to officer
09:19:39 Eric Wasierski, selected as police Officer of the
09:19:46 Month for July 2006.
09:19:48 As he patrols our city, he locates and then stops the
09:19:52 suspects who continue in their criminal activities in
09:19:55 our community. This former field training office
09:19:58 Cerra strong role rod he will for all TPD officers for

09:20:01 keeping our city safe. The City Council and City of
09:20:04 Tampa commends you and I particularly say thank you
09:20:08 and it is my pleasure to present this to you.
09:20:10 Thank you for everything that you do.
09:20:12 [ Applause ]
09:20:16 We have some awards and presents.
09:20:18 Why don't you bring them up here?
09:20:23 Introduce them.
09:20:23 >> My long-time girlfriend Britt Martinez.
09:20:28 She makes me get up every morning and exercise.
09:20:31 And makes sure I eat good and everything.
09:20:34 My parents, Jane and Clary.
09:20:44 Work ethic, it started in my dad.
09:20:47 Thank you.
09:20:49 This is an honor.
09:20:50 I appreciate this award.
09:20:52 Councilman Dingfelder, I believe it's your district I
09:20:54 patrol.
09:20:56 South of Gandy.
09:20:59 A lot of nice folks there.
09:21:01 And
09:21:06 Rest assured the chief is part of it, too. I'm off

09:21:08 today, I'm off today.
09:21:10 But it's in good hands, I'm sure.
09:21:21 I can't do this by myself.
09:21:23 I have got it a really good squad, good leadership.
09:21:28 My captain is here, Bruce Jordan, captain Miller, my
09:21:32 advisors, sergeant Dicky.
09:21:35 Two of the most knowledgeable officers I know.
09:21:41 And my squad.
09:21:47 They are not here but I will sure share this with
09:21:51 them.
09:21:51 They are just as responsible as I am.
09:21:54 So thank you.
09:21:55 I appreciate it.
09:21:57 [ Applause ]
09:22:04 >>ROSE FERLITA: Eric, we have a few of our corporate
09:22:06 members in the community that would like to say thanks
09:22:08 in their own way.
09:22:17 >>> Tampa Lowry Park Zoo.
09:22:18 On behalf of the zoo I want to present with you some
09:22:21 passes and say thank you for everything you do and
09:22:24 hopefully you and your family can come.
09:22:29 So thank you so much.

09:22:35 >> Representing Bill Currie Ford.
09:22:38 On behalf of Bill Currie Ford and all of its employees
09:22:41 we would like to present with you this TPD watch.
09:22:44 Thank you for everything you do for our community and
09:22:47 protecting our people
09:22:56 >>> Steve Stickley representing Stepp's towing.
09:22:59 Eric, congratulations.
09:23:00 We appreciate everything you do.
09:23:01 On behalf of Jim and Judy Stepp, Stepp's towing
09:23:06 service we would like to present with you this statue
09:23:08 for a job well done.
09:23:09 We also have a gift certificate to Leroy Selmon's.
09:23:17 Thank you for everything you do out there.
09:23:21 >>STEVE MICHELINI: You're looking scared.
09:23:24 A lot of people.
09:23:25 I'm here on behalf of a variety of different people.
09:23:28 I just want to let you have your photograph taken
09:23:32 first.
09:23:32 And then you can enjoy the rest of these things.
09:23:34 I don't want you to gain too much weight.
09:23:39 Bryn Allen studios is presenting with you a
09:23:41 photographic package for you and your family and you

09:23:43 can go have your portrait done over there. And they
09:23:45 are going to put together a real nice package for you.
09:23:48 On behalf of Liss development and Bern's steak house,
09:23:52 they are providing you a $100 gift certificate so you
09:23:54 can enjoy yourself when you are traveling north out of
09:23:57 south Gandy, back home or wherever you are going.
09:23:59 On behalf of the Hillsborough County towing
09:24:02 association we are providing you with a $50 gift
09:24:04 certificate to your choice, Outback, Carrabba's, and
09:24:09 Po Boy's creole cafe is presenting with you a $50 gift
09:24:13 certificate for lunch or dinner.
09:24:15 One thing I want, your work is a testimony not just to
09:24:18 you but to the chief and the deputy chiefs and the
09:24:25 spirit de corps that they have established.
09:24:29 It makes them feel belter and makes you feel better
09:24:31 when you have a full stomach.
09:24:33 It's a good deal all the way around and we really
09:24:36 appreciate what you do for the citizens of Tampa and
09:24:37 this community overall.
09:24:39 Thank you very much.
09:24:44 [ Applause ]
09:24:45 >>ROSE FERLITA: Eric, a couple of our corporate

09:24:48 representatives were not able to be here and they
09:24:50 asked me to give you a couple of awards on their
09:24:52 behalf.
09:24:52 So enterprise rental is giving you a free weekend
09:24:56 special for being the Officer of the Month.
09:24:57 And there's a certificate for that.
09:25:00 Some of our new corporate members, Charlie's steak
09:25:04 house, is giving you a certificate for $100.
09:25:06 And something from me.
09:25:22 Thank you to you and your fine family and girlfriend
09:25:24 for their support.
09:25:25 We certainly appreciate it.
09:25:33 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I just wanted to say two things
09:25:35 actually.
09:25:35 One, as I look over here against the window, your
09:25:40 train of command is so impressive.
09:25:42 And, chief, looking at the men and women you have
09:25:46 behind you, that's just such a professional group.
09:25:49 And you should be very proud.
09:25:51 And I can see how it's a great honor to work for that
09:25:54 group of officers.
09:25:57 The other thing I wanted to say is, as you know, I'm

09:26:00 sure, when you're south of Gandy, you're a SOG, S-O-G.
09:26:08 Anyway, on behalf of all the SOGs we appreciate your
09:26:13 hard work.
09:26:14 >> I just want top say congratulations once again to
09:26:16 the officer, wonderful job that you are doing.
09:26:19 I just wanted to -- while the chief is here I had a
09:26:22 question that was going to be directed to him in our
09:26:26 information system.
09:26:26 I figured if I could get him while he's here, he won't
09:26:30 have to come back.
09:26:31 Finance you know the answer, chief, that's fine.
09:26:34 In Ybor City this weekend, and as we have all talked
09:26:39 about making Ybor City a more friendlier place
09:26:42 especially after dark, officers are doing a fine job
09:26:46 out there, but the "no parking" on 7th Avenue after
09:26:51 9:00 -- 7th Avenue after 9:00, I had about five
09:26:54 people come up to me this weekend saying -- I guess
09:26:57 there was a verbal understanding that TPD was going to
09:27:01 give like a 15-minute courtesy window at the 9 p.m.
09:27:08 hour before citizens started receiving citations for
09:27:11 parking on 7th Avenue, not with the metered spots
09:27:16 but with the no parking and I had about four, maybe

09:27:20 five people run up to me, and I had a copy brought in
09:27:23 the other day.
09:27:25 But it's 9:02 or 9:05.
09:27:30 Then at 9:15 thereabouts started towing.
09:27:33 I was just wondering, is that still a practice?
09:27:40 That was my understanding from council that we were
09:27:42 giving some -- or from the department, shall I say.
09:27:46 >>CHIEF HOGUE: What essentially happens that's
09:27:50 generally kind of a de facto, 15-minute brace period
09:27:53 because, one, the officers that do that start at one
09:27:55 end and work their way down.
09:27:57 But they do start at 9:00, or just shortly thereafter,
09:28:02 at one end of the street.
09:28:03 By the time they get down to the other end it's
09:28:05 probably 9:15 or so and then the wreckers come in and
09:28:08 start picking those up.
09:28:12 >>KEVIN WHITE: The only reason I really thought it was
09:28:15 maybe not even a problem per se but somebody's watch
09:28:20 is off two to three minutes, and you have tickets
09:28:24 marked at 9:02, and these weren't the meter maids,
09:28:31 these were actual citations from TPD.
09:28:33 I was just saying if there is a sort of window, that's

09:28:37 fine.
09:28:37 If not, I need to just go back and tell some of the
09:28:42 establishment owners down there that, you know, that
09:28:45 9:00 is 9:00, and that's what TPD said, and it is what
09:28:49 it is.
09:28:50 That's basically the information that I need to know.
09:28:52 And if you are telling me right now that 9:00 is 9:00
09:28:55 and we are starting on the dot, that's fine, I just
09:28:58 would like to know.
09:28:59 >>ROSE FERLITA: Mr. White, let me just ask you
09:29:02 something.
09:29:02 So your question, I can get more comprehensive
09:29:10 feedback.
09:29:11 Why don't we take that up when, chief, you can get
09:29:16 together with Mr. White.
09:29:17 I don't want this to overshadow Eric's time in the
09:29:20 limelight and maybe we should do it a little bit
09:29:22 longer, if that's okay.
09:29:28 >> Fine.
09:29:29 >>ROSE FERLITA: Eric, if you will sit tight.
09:29:31 We have an additional award that we would like to
09:29:33 give.

09:29:33 And again it is back to you and back to the chief and
09:29:36 back to everybody that represents TPD.
09:29:38 So take some pictures with the camera.
09:29:46 At this point on item 2, Madam Chairman, if I can go
09:29:49 forward with that, I'd like to bring up three ladies
09:29:55 that represent friends of TPD and that's Dr. McClinton
09:30:00 Greco, and Denherst. If they can join me at the
09:30:12 podium.
09:30:13 I am going to ask Linda to give you some history about
09:30:15 what they do and how they formed this team that
09:30:19 assists TPD and anybody that does anything for TPD I
09:30:23 think we are all appreciative of.
09:30:24 It's kind of TPD's separate fund for unfunded wants
09:30:28 and needs.
09:30:29 And you represent what everybody wants to do, to say
09:30:34 thank you to TPD in your own way.
09:30:36 Yours is very effective because it's usually a
09:30:38 financial award.
09:30:39 So Linda, if you would be so kind to give us a brief
09:30:43 history of TPD and how long it's been there and what
09:30:45 you guys have done.
09:30:46 And I do want to tell you before I yield to Linda and

09:30:49 give her the microphone, I kept thinking as we were
09:30:51 going to go into this award, that as we were talking
09:30:54 about Eric's foundation and support behind him, we had
09:30:58 a wonderful, wonderful time in this city under the
09:31:01 administration and under the watch of Dick Greco.
09:31:04 And of course Dick Greco always shared the limelight.
09:31:08 But sometimes I think maybe we were deficient in
09:31:11 saying thank you to Linda on that.
09:31:12 She was the person behind Dick that spurred things to
09:31:16 get done, and was very conscious of what they needed
09:31:20 as a team, as a husband and wife to do for all our
09:31:23 community.
09:31:23 I want to take this opportunity, Linda -- and this was
09:31:27 not prepared -- but it is my pleasure to serve as a
09:31:30 council member under his watch, and I just want to
09:31:32 thank you for what he did, with your help, and that
09:31:35 you guys did as a team.
09:31:36 So that being said, I think this is very effective and
09:31:41 very right on target, because I think Mayor Greco was
09:31:48 so won any supportive of TPD.
09:31:50 And this is all about friends of TPD, and Linda will
09:31:52 come forward and talk a little about that.

09:31:54 And the last thing, I continue to say I am going to
09:31:56 yield.
09:31:57 John, I think you mentioned something awhile back.
09:32:00 I'll be leaving soon so I hope what you talked about
09:32:02 in terms of trying to do something to honor the
09:32:04 wonderful Dick Greco years we can get done before
09:32:07 November.
09:32:07 I would like that.
09:32:08 So Linda, thank you very much.
09:32:13 >>> Linda Greco: I appreciate those words, totally
09:32:16 unnecessary.
09:32:16 In 1996, I was lucky enough to, with another group of
09:32:20 citizens, form friends of TPD.
09:32:23 This was before 9/11, before it was a popular thing to
09:32:27 say thank you to the men and women who put their lives
09:32:29 on the line every single day.
09:32:32 Most of the time, normal citizens only come into
09:32:35 contact with these officers when you're maybe getting
09:32:38 a ticket, because there's no other contact.
09:32:42 But, you know, we take for granted that we sleep at
09:32:44 night because of you.
09:32:47 And what chaos it would be without having each and

09:32:50 every one of you take care of us.
09:32:52 And with that in mind, I wanted to say thank you.
09:32:56 So this group was formed.
09:32:59 And we actually put together about half a million
09:33:03 dollars of funding, in both in-kind and in cash.
09:33:07 And initially it was for the renovation, because, of
09:33:11 course, the building that is across the street, was a
09:33:15 bank building and not a police station, and there
09:33:17 wasn't any funding to revamp that building.
09:33:20 So that was the initial projection, to do that.
09:33:23 We then decided after we finished that, that there was
09:33:27 so much enthusiasm in the community to say thank you,
09:33:29 because people just didn't know how.
09:33:31 And we have money left.
09:33:33 So we said, we are going to go ahead and earmark that
09:33:35 for safety and training.
09:33:37 And so with that in mind, you have gold shield, you
09:33:40 have all these other organizations, that take care of
09:33:42 the officers after something happens.
09:33:44 But we wanted to be preventative and say, let's give
09:33:48 them the training, and the necessary equipment to keep
09:33:50 them alive.

09:33:52 And so to that effect, there's a list that you will be
09:33:56 getting.
09:33:56 We have already funded about $150,000 worth of
09:34:00 equipment, and still have money to go.
09:34:05 This has been done with all volunteers.
09:34:09 We have only spent 2% or less than 2% for
09:34:13 administrative costs.
09:34:14 Everything else goes straight to the officers.
09:34:18 And so thank you, Rose, for this time to explain this
09:34:22 to you.
09:34:23 I know that many people don't even know we exist.
09:34:26 But it's called "friends of TPD" 501(c)3 and we are
09:34:31 here to do even more.
09:34:32 Thank you.
09:34:33 [ Applause ]
09:34:41 >>CHIEF HOGUE: I would like to take the opportunity to
09:34:43 say publicly thank you to Linda and to the
09:34:45 organization of friends for TPD.
09:34:48 You know, like she said, this organization has been in
09:34:53 existence about ten years.
09:34:57 It's one of only four in the nation.
09:34:59 And since the original moneys that were spent on the

09:35:04 renovation of the building, which is $150, that's an
09:35:08 additional $150 for that.
09:35:12 It has been earmarked for training and safety, which
09:35:14 is, you know, not so much safety, but training is
09:35:22 always an issue with the police department.
09:35:23 And they have provided us with training that we
09:35:27 wouldn't have been able to get across the board for a
09:35:31 number of our officers.
09:35:32 And the equipment that they have bought for the police
09:35:35 department, just one that I remember recently, and I
09:35:40 think it's Nomex, the suits that the pilots wear, they
09:35:44 brought Nomex suits for all of our pilots out there
09:35:48 and these are very special suits, flight suits that
09:35:50 they wear that are very fire resistance.
09:35:53 So if the helicopter goes down in a crash this is a
09:35:57 huge safety issue for those officers.
09:36:00 This is something they need, something they wanted to
09:36:02 do, and these are the kinds of things that really they
09:36:04 have done through their whole exist sense of 13 years.
09:36:08 So on behalf of the officers, the men and women that
09:36:10 work at the police department, I want to say thank you
09:36:13 very much.

09:36:15 [ Applause ]
09:36:26 >> Major John Bennett, special operations, Tampa
09:36:29 Police Department.
09:36:30 Most of these unfunded requests for equipment end up
09:36:32 in my division.
09:36:34 In some of the higher liability areas like the chief
09:36:37 mentioned, Nomex suits, bullet-proof vests for our
09:36:43 canine dogs, and I am going to leave a slide version
09:36:47 for everybody to look at the history, not only the
09:36:49 history but the funds provided by the friends of TPD.
09:36:52 One specific thing about the donation that's occurring
09:36:54 today is that through our homeland security funding,
09:36:58 there are certain things that the department can't use
09:37:00 that money for.
09:37:01 And again the money now is going towards the canine
09:37:05 mounted and the tactical response team to provide more
09:37:08 safe equipment for them that we couldn't fund through
09:37:11 the normal processes, and the homeland security money
09:37:14 will allow won't allow certain purchases.
09:37:18 Today that's what their donation is representing.
09:37:20 We also would like to point out that as you enter the
09:37:22 police department, there's a donor's tree, as soon as

09:37:26 you walk in at the escalator, and we would like
09:37:29 anybody who visits the police department for tours or
09:37:32 just for business sake to look at that donor's tree
09:37:35 because it's one of those partnerships in the
09:37:37 community that's through the friends of TPD that shows
09:37:40 the great partnerships that we have in our community
09:37:42 that end up funding some of the things that sometimes
09:37:44 we can't get through the federal program, our local
09:37:48 budget system, or just technology and safety changes
09:37:51 so fast that sometimes when it funding can't Koch up
09:37:57 they close the gap, and the friends of TPD was
09:37:59 pre-positioned to give us $100 when our body armor was
09:38:07 deficient, and if it wasn't for the legal system, was
09:38:10 able to get this money back through legal procurement,
09:38:13 they were able to fund that gap that was very serious
09:38:15 and very critical for our agency.
09:38:17 And they are also looking to close the gap between the
09:38:19 legal mechanisms and the gap in funding that we
09:38:22 realized by having to buy all of these vests almost
09:38:24 overnight because we found they were degrading
09:38:27 rapidly.
09:38:27 So we can't thank them enough, can't thank the

09:38:31 community partners, friends of TPD enough.
09:38:33 We certainly appreciate this donation today.
09:38:35 Thank you.
09:38:38 [ Applause ]
09:38:45 >>> Well, we talked it's a great pleasure that friends
09:38:50 of TPD present to Rose and the chief, and a check for
09:38:56 $22,000.
09:38:58 This represents, in your booklet, I think it's posters
09:39:06 and -- holsters and lasers.
09:39:09 Once again this is just another check.
09:39:10 We have more to go.
09:39:11 And we would like to do these on a regular basis,
09:39:16 maybe every few months for you.
09:39:17 So give us a list of what else you need, because we
09:39:20 still have money in the bank.
09:39:24 And we still are asking the community to join with us
09:39:27 to say thank you.
09:39:27 Because this is the right way to say thank you to our
09:39:30 police department.
09:39:31 [ Applause ]
09:39:34 >>ROSE FERLITA: $23,012.99.
09:39:42 I think Marilyn has a couple of comments.

09:39:45 First I was delighted to hear that we have
09:39:47 bullet-proof vests for our canine team.
09:39:49 That's just wonderful.
09:39:50 And the Nomex suit, if plans go well for me and you
09:39:57 have an extra, I sure could use one in November
09:39:59 probably.
09:40:02 >>> I just wanted to comment that my initial
09:40:04 association with friends of TPD was as the president
09:40:07 of the city-wide neighborhood watch organization.
09:40:10 And all the support that we provided was through that
09:40:13 venue.
09:40:15 I continued to work on behalf of -- and even though I
09:40:19 am not in that position anymore -- with friends of
09:40:23 TPD, would like to ask and encourage all the
09:40:25 organizations in Tampa to please keep this
09:40:27 organization in mind when they have funds that they
09:40:32 perhaps would like to donate to something.
09:40:34 There's nothing more worthy than keeping our men and
09:40:36 women in uniform safe.
09:40:40 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I have a question.
09:40:41 Marilyn, or Dr. Linda, since you have the camera, the
09:40:46 opportunity of the camera, what's the best way to get

09:40:49 in touch with friends of TPD in terms of folks out
09:40:52 there who might be watching and might want to make a
09:40:54 donation?
09:40:56 Should they call the police department, or contact you
09:40:59 all directly?
09:41:01 >>> As I said, we don't have staff.
09:41:03 We do this all with volunteers.
09:41:05 So I will give you my office phone number and handle
09:41:09 it out of there.
09:41:10 813-286-4404.
09:41:14 And once again, 98.8% of your money goes straight to
09:41:21 the police department.
09:41:24 We do this through our heart.
09:41:26 Please call and we would welcome your participation.
09:41:30 And thank you very much for the opportunity.
09:41:31 >> 813-286-4404.
09:41:44 >>ROSE FERLITA: Thank you for your indulgence but this
09:41:46 is such an important issue.
09:41:49 Thank you.
09:41:54 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a special guest with us this
09:42:09 morning and the team of preservation.
09:42:13 They are members of the entrepreneur program for the

09:42:18 Stroh city CBC, provides real life employment
09:42:22 experience with literacy.
09:42:29 Will you please stand?
09:42:29 Is there a spokesperson for the group?
09:42:31 Do we have a spokesperson?
09:42:45 >>> Good morning.
09:42:46 My name is Lee Roy Selmon.
09:42:50 And I work with the CDC program in the capacity of
09:42:55 somewhat of a volunteer, and help the young people.
09:42:59 And I do whatever that I can do in order to help them
09:43:03 to explore other avenues of employment and different
09:43:09 areas in the city that provides an avenue of escape
09:43:14 out of whatever situations that they may be in.
09:43:17 And these young men and women who are do a very, very
09:43:21 good job in trying to obtain whatever information that
09:43:25 is available to them.
09:43:26 And our purpose, team preservation, is an
09:43:30 entrepreneurial program that is sponsored by the
09:43:33 central city CDC, is operated by its membership with
09:43:36 the direction of CDC staff.
09:43:39 This program focuses on the inner city youth of Tampa
09:43:43 and provides real-life employment experiences with an

09:43:46 emphasis on financial lit ras you I.
09:43:49 Our goal -- literacy.
09:43:51 Our goal is to provide the teens needed in life,
09:43:57 skills and good work ethic.
09:44:00 It teens are required to complete an employment
09:44:04 application and sponsor a personal interview, the
09:44:08 basic financial skills include writing checks and
09:44:11 balancing a checkbook.
09:44:12 Accomplishments: The TFP has served more than 200
09:44:17 teens between the ages of 10 and 18 throughout the
09:44:19 past six years.
09:44:20 This program has thrived for excellency and as a
09:44:25 result was a recipient of the business of the year
09:44:27 award for keeping Hillsborough County beautiful.
09:44:31 This same standard results in TFP's present
09:44:36 organization in central city CDC, received the
09:44:39 neighborhood excellence award from Bank of America.
09:44:43 Our summer program, some of the highlights included a
09:44:48 tour of the classrooms and dormitory facilities at the
09:44:52 University of South Florida, visit to the Florida
09:44:56 Aquarium, movies, bowling, and playing basketball.
09:44:58 The program concluded with a back-to-school dance at

09:45:03 the YMCA.
09:45:04 We are very grateful and look forward to working with
09:45:07 our partners, Hartline, public transportation and the
09:45:11 YMCA.
09:45:13 And we thank all of you for allowing us the
09:45:15 opportunity to come down here to see how the City of
09:45:19 Tampa business is run.
09:45:24 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank you.
09:45:25 Before you all leave, we have some souvenirs for you
09:45:28 at the reception desk, if you go out the door and turn
09:45:31 to your left.
09:45:32 We have some souvenirs for all the teens.
09:45:37 [ Applause ]
09:45:41 >>> Marshall, central city CDC.
09:45:44 I want to thank councilwoman, Gwen Miller, for
09:45:48 allowing us the opportunity to come in.
09:45:50 Our kids this year decided we have, in our program,
09:45:55 teen leaders that have been on for more than a year,
09:45:59 and they have decided that this year, they are going
09:46:03 to be identifying their career goals, looking at
09:46:06 things, at careers that are out there. And government
09:46:11 is one of the things that they wanted to do.

09:46:13 And when I told that to councilwoman, chairwoman Gwen
09:46:18 Miller, she said, great.
09:46:20 I'm so happy.
09:46:21 And I thank you all for allowing us this opportunity
09:46:23 to see how government operates.
09:46:27 Thank you.
09:46:29 [ Applause ]
09:46:30 >>GWEN MILLER: We have some more teens visiting us
09:46:38 this morning.
09:46:40 Will you please stand?
09:46:41 Do you have a spokesperson?
09:46:51 >>> Good morning.
09:46:53 My name is Connie Simms.
09:46:55 I live in the Watch Hill neighborhood.
09:46:59 And we are hear to support a facility in our
09:47:01 neighborhood called the Dallas house.
09:47:05 The Dallas house has been in operation for the last
09:47:08 seven years.
09:47:09 It was founded and donated by our director and our
09:47:16 fund-raiser.
09:47:19 The Dallas house has provided several services over
09:47:23 the past few years, such as tutorial service for the

09:47:27 children, Spanish literacy, G.E.D. programs.
09:47:32 I'm here to continue -- to presentations of community
09:47:39 support.
09:47:40 We talk about academic success of our children.
09:47:43 And I believe that the community is a big part of
09:47:46 that.
09:47:50 Before academic success, the child, the parent, and
09:47:55 the school, the teacher.
09:47:57 But I believe that the community support is truly,
09:48:02 truly important in that because we can build the
09:48:05 spirit of giving back to the community.
09:48:11 Today we have a field trip to better understand City
09:48:15 Council for or our children, and we'll go back and
09:48:18 discuss that with them.
09:48:21 And we'll give you more details in terms of the future
09:48:24 vision.
09:48:37 >>> Thank you for giving us a few minutes to talk
09:48:39 about the Dallas house in the watch hill neighborhood,
09:48:46 which is actually a smaller section within the East
09:48:48 Tampa business and civic association, but it was sort
09:48:52 of a little watch hill mini-neighborhood that started
09:48:56 doing things separately as a community, came together

09:49:00 and decided we needed something in that area for the
09:49:03 children in the and the Dallas house was formed out of
09:49:07 a vacant property that probably would have become
09:49:10 another drug house.
09:49:11 We are here basically, as a lot of people who are here
09:49:17 before you to do, we are here to ask for money, we are
09:49:19 here to ask for City Council and any other members of
09:49:23 Tampa city staff to help us look for funding to keep
09:49:26 the program afloat.
09:49:27 We have a vision that is not fully realized yet.
09:49:31 But we started with the kids who at least are showing
09:49:35 up, indicating that they want to do something positive
09:49:38 with their lives.
09:49:39 And we feel like with an intergenerational approach,
09:49:43 meaning that we can work with the young people, we can
09:49:46 work with teens, we can work with young adults, we
09:49:48 have a lot of juvenile ex-offenders in our community,
09:49:52 we have a lot of adult ex-offenders in our community,
09:49:56 and we want to be able to create sort of a seed pot
09:50:00 program where people can come in and use our
09:50:03 facilities and facilities of our partners for the
09:50:05 kinds of services that they need.

09:50:07 So we are asking for your support.
09:50:09 And if anybody wants to write a letter endorsing the
09:50:13 fact that we are trying to bring those types of
09:50:15 services into watch hill, we are more than happy to
09:50:18 have that.
09:50:19 And we really want to thank Councilman White, a
09:50:24 memorandum to budget director Jim Stefan, asking if he
09:50:27 could help us look for funding.
09:50:32 And we are also asking City Council, please take a
09:50:35 look at our program.
09:50:36 Come by and visit anytime, call us up, stop in, and we
09:50:39 are more than happy to show you what we are trying to
09:50:41 do.
09:50:42 And we appreciate the time, Chairman Miller, to
09:50:45 address council.
09:50:46 If you have any questions, please give us a call.
09:50:49 Thank you.
09:50:49 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank your thank you for come.
09:50:52 We need to approve the agenda.
09:50:56 We have a motion.
09:50:57 Would anybody like to pull anything from the agenda?
09:51:00 >> Move approval.

09:51:06 >> Second.
09:51:06 (Motion carried).
09:51:07 >>GWEN MILLER: We go to our staff reports.
09:51:09 Ms. Cathy Coyle.
09:51:19 >>GLORIA MOREDA: Cathy asked me to request that
09:51:22 council set a workshop for the Channel District and
09:51:26 the TPD bonus periphery, criteria ordinance that she's
09:51:32 prepared.
09:51:34 She'd like it for August 31st at 11 or 130,
09:51:40 council's convenience, in council chambers.
09:51:42 And then she would, upon review of the ordinance, she
09:51:45 could then transmit it to the Planning Commission in
09:51:49 September.
09:51:52 >>MARY ALVAREZ: So moved, August 31st.
09:51:55 >>GWEN MILLER: At 11.
09:51:57 Motion and second.
09:51:57 (Motion carried)
09:52:02 Stay there and do yours.
09:52:05 >>> I have two young ladies from Germany, if they
09:52:07 could stand or come forward.
09:52:08 I want to introduce them to council.
09:52:10 They are interns that have been working with the city.

09:52:13 Rebecca shoreman and Rebecca Cox, both attending the
09:52:20 university of Prague in Germany.
09:52:23 And seek ago degree in public administration.
09:52:25 And over the last month and a half, I think, they have
09:52:28 been working with Stuart Campbell in housing, and also
09:52:32 Rebecca in the Parks Department.
09:52:36 I just wanted council to meet them.
09:52:39 And they are going to be watching you today.
09:52:42 >>GWEN MILLER: Welcome.
09:52:54 >> Mr. David Smith.
09:52:59 >>DAVID SMITH: I have a new one.
09:53:16 David Smith, city attorney.
09:53:17 I wanted to appear before you to indicate, I am going
09:53:20 to be requesting, unfortunately not until August
09:53:24 3rd, that we continue the proposed scheduling of
09:53:28 the historic preservation ordinance.
09:53:31 And the reason I wanted to come down here today is
09:53:33 because there are many interested parties in this
09:53:36 ordinance.
09:53:36 And I wanted to make sure that when they are making
09:53:41 travel plans I have advance notice.
09:53:43 I know you can't officially continue it until it comes

09:53:45 before you August 3rd.
09:53:46 But I will not have an ordinance for you that day.
09:53:49 And I'll give you a also bit of background on it.
09:53:52 There are a plethora of people who want to be involved
09:53:55 in this process and that's good.
09:53:57 But I want to have an opportunity to hear from them
09:53:59 directly and to workshop it informally, and to get all
09:54:02 that input so you're not sorting through that here.
09:54:06 We need to take your time and use it much more wisely
09:54:10 than that.
09:54:10 So we will be doing that.
09:54:11 And I will be scheduling meetings.
09:54:13 I have been communicating with Ms. Johnson who you all
09:54:16 know is very interested in this area.
09:54:18 She will be one of the participants.
09:54:20 David Mechanik is interested.
09:54:22 John Grandoff is also indicated his interest, in I
09:54:27 believe historic preservation trust.
09:54:29 There's plenty of people.
09:54:30 So we will be getting a variety of input.
09:54:34 It's also important to try to get this scheduled
09:54:38 without waiting too long, because the cigar factory

09:54:42 issue is being postponed, has been postponed pending
09:54:45 this.
09:54:45 I do not want these property owners to be deferred too
09:54:49 long.
09:54:49 We need to get this ordinance sorted out and process
09:54:52 determined so that they can also have appropriate
09:54:55 determinations for their property.
09:54:57 I spoke with the attorney representing these property
09:54:59 owners.
09:55:00 I was going to be recommending we defer this to
09:55:02 September 21st.
09:55:03 Again, you can't officially do that till August
09:55:06 3rd.
09:55:07 But I was going to pick that date because it was
09:55:09 between the budget hearings.
09:55:10 Unfortunately Mr. Grandoff cannot be here that day.
09:55:12 And I certainly have no problems moving it to October
09:55:17 5th, because it's really to make sure these
09:55:20 property owners don't remain in limbo unnecessarily
09:55:23 long.
09:55:23 And he's willing to go with October 5th.
09:55:26 Again I am not asking you to take any action today

09:55:28 because you can't.
09:55:30 It's set for a time certain, August 3rd, actually
09:55:33 at 1:30.
09:55:34 But we will be here that day.
09:55:36 We will provide you an update on the local government
09:55:41 certificates program but we won't have the ordinance.
09:55:44 So all those people interested in participating will
09:55:46 be able to make appropriate plans.
09:55:48 And anyone else out there who is interested in
09:55:50 commenting on it, please give me a call.
09:55:52 We do want the input.
09:55:54 We do want to get that done as quickly and
09:55:56 expeditiously as possible.
09:55:57 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Mr. Smith, without giving away too
09:56:02 much, in your assessment, is progress being made
09:56:07 towards some middle ground, or are we just still far
09:56:12 apart and we don't know what's going to happen here?
09:56:16 >>DAVID SMITH: I think some progress is being made.
09:56:17 I think there's going to be some fundamental things
09:56:21 that are going to occur and there's nothing we can do.
09:56:24 We can bring that to you clearly and decisively and
09:56:27 you as legislators are going to have to make that call

09:56:30 but I would like to clear away as much debris as
09:56:32 possible so I think we can present something to you a
09:56:35 little more succinct with the information you need to
09:56:38 make an informed decision.
09:56:40 >>SHAWN HARRISON: We need to make sure the folks who
09:56:42 we are going to fly down for this like happened last
09:56:45 time, this is not going to happen on August 3rd,
09:56:47 save your money, we'll let now when it's going to
09:56:49 happen.
09:56:50 >> Yes, sir.
09:56:51 And it looks like October 5th.
09:56:53 That will be decided August 3rd the precise
09:56:55 extension.
09:56:55 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Okay.
09:56:57 >>DAVID SMITH: Thank you very much.
09:56:58 >>GWEN MILLER: Ms. Julie Cole.
09:57:01 >>JULIA COLE: I will address you from up here if
09:57:04 that's okay.
09:57:05 Thank you for the opportunity to sit up here with you.
09:57:08 I submitted to council -- as you may recall in the
09:57:15 Kress square designations a request, a statute was
09:57:19 failed.

09:57:19 We have gone through that process.
09:57:21 And I submitted another one yesterday, the response of
09:57:25 the special master.
09:57:26 We need to go ahead and have that scheduled to be
09:57:28 heard by you.
09:57:29 It will not be heard by you today.
09:57:30 And I am requesting that that be scheduled to be heard
09:57:33 by you on August 3rd.
09:57:38 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'll move to schedule August
09:57:39 3rd.
09:57:40 Will that be a public hearing?
09:57:42 Or will there be an opportunity for public input?
09:57:46 What is the process?
09:57:48 >>JULIA COLE: It wouldn't technically be scheduled as
09:57:50 a public hearing because what is coming in front of
09:57:52 you is the recommendation of the special master and I
09:57:55 will be presenting you to you, the process, whichever
09:58:01 of you wishes to approve that, that's what you will be
09:58:04 doing.
09:58:04 However the process calls for certain members of the
09:58:06 public who have filed proper notification to be
09:58:09 involved in the process, if they have -- or members of

09:58:14 the public who have, they would then have the
09:58:16 opportunity to speak to that issue.
09:58:18 It wouldn't be necessarily open to the public.
09:58:20 However, at the time that this comes before you, if
09:58:23 council chooses to open it up for additional comments,
09:58:26 that would be council's determination.
09:58:33 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I can't recall from the situation
09:58:35 to this -- I don't remember it.
09:58:40 Could you meet with all the council members ahead of
09:58:42 time and bring us up to speed on what this process is
09:58:45 like?
09:58:45 And secondly, do you think it would be valuable to
09:58:47 have any kind of public discussion just prior to this?
09:58:53 Or is this council session going to be the public
09:58:57 discussion?
09:58:58 Because if it is, I think it might be valuable to take
09:59:00 the 1:30 slot that we are planning on spending on
09:59:04 preservation and schedule this at 1:30.
09:59:07 Because that is going to be a long discussion.
09:59:08 >>JULIA COLE: The answer to the first question, yes, I
09:59:12 intend to schedule time with council members to
09:59:14 discuss the process and discuss what will be coming in

09:59:17 front of you.
09:59:22 I believe there may be additional discussion as Mr.
09:59:25 Smith indicated, that there will be discussion of the
09:59:28 local government.
09:59:29 I don't know if that will be at 1:30 but we can
09:59:31 schedule the 1:30 time.
09:59:35 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Yes, I agree with Ms. Saul-Sena, that
09:59:38 I believe this is going to be a long discussion.
09:59:46 I'm looking at the August 3rd, 1:30, will be the
09:59:49 continued initiation of local landmark process.
10:00:09 >> Would you like to call it the Kress --
10:00:12 >>> Kress.
10:00:13 >>GWEN MILLER: All in favor of the motion say Aye.
10:00:15 Opposed, Nay.
10:00:18 Motion carried.
10:00:19 We go to item 3.
10:00:20 Anyone here from administration to talk about the
10:00:24 signs?
10:00:25 >>THE CLERK: We received a memo on that.
10:00:36 >>> We request a continuance because we have not been
10:00:38 able to meet with the commercial businesses in the
10:00:40 area.

10:00:40 We have met with the residents.
10:00:42 We did so on June 26th.
10:00:44 They felt it was an important part to be able to meet
10:00:46 with the business community as well before we
10:00:49 implemented any restrictions in the area.
10:00:51 And we were having ongoing discussions at that time.
10:00:55 >> Madam Chairman?
10:01:00 Mr. LaMotte, is the city exploring at all the option
10:01:03 of having some kind of parking at someplace kind of
10:01:10 off-site and having some kind of circulator on Howard
10:01:16 Avenue, so that it would relieve, for example --
10:01:20 there's a bank at the corner of Howard and Kennedy.
10:01:23 And they have a large parking lot that I assume isn't
10:01:26 used on a Thursday, Friday or Saturday night.
10:01:28 That there could be like off-site parking and
10:01:31 circulator that helps with the parking problem.
10:01:39 Is that part of your conversation?
10:01:43 >>ROY LAMOTTE: Yes.
10:01:44 We are absolutely going to entertain those
10:01:46 conversation was the business community.
10:01:47 We believe part of the solution here, and we are going
10:01:49 to entertain any off-site parking capability that we

10:01:52 can.
10:01:53 And that's one of the recommendations that we are
10:01:55 going to try to get things to buy in to.
10:01:59 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I just wanted to express my
10:02:01 appreciation to Mr. LaMotte and your staff.
10:02:03 I have been getting the e-mails and seeing the
10:02:05 progress that you all are doing and the work you are
10:02:06 putting into it.
10:02:07 We appreciate it.
10:02:08 I know the Soho folks and the Courier City folks
10:02:11 appreciate it, too.
10:02:12 Thank you.
10:02:14 >>ROSE FERLITA: Let me express my -- thank you for you
10:02:18 moving this on.
10:02:18 I think we are talking about the same meeting at
10:02:24 Starbuck's.
10:02:25 I think it's important to continue it a little bit
10:02:27 because we want to have some sort of cooperative
10:02:30 resolution to this, with -- that the business
10:02:34 community is happy with it and at the same time Mr.
10:02:36 Crumbly and his neighbors, et cetera, can get some
10:02:38 relief from what we are doing.

10:02:39 I think in order to have a very comprehensive plan to
10:02:41 go forward, I think you're right, needs a little more
10:02:46 time to get to where we need to be.
10:02:49 >> We'll be back to you shortly with a comprehensive
10:02:54 plan.
10:02:57 >>ROY LAMOTTE: I know it sounds long but I would
10:03:00 actually like to ask you for four weeks, because of
10:03:02 the difficulty of trying to get business people that
10:03:04 may be on vacation at this time together with us.
10:03:09 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion and second to continue
10:03:11 item number 3 for four weeks.
10:03:12 (Motion carried)
10:03:15 Item number 4.
10:03:23 >>GLORIA MOREDA: Land development
10:03:35 My apologies, I thought we were doing number 5.
10:03:39 >> Bayshore first.
10:03:41 >>> I just want to let council know what progress we
10:03:43 are making in our office.
10:03:45 Heather Lamboy is going to be the lead planner in
10:03:48 developing the study for the Bayshore area.
10:03:58 We were successful in finding some of the documents
10:04:00 that Mrs. Saul-Sena pointed out in terms of the

10:04:04 Planning Commission library.
10:04:05 She is also -- identified August 10th as the date
10:04:11 we are going to have the workshop at the Kate Jackson
10:04:14 rec center.
10:04:15 And it will be August 10th from 6 to 8 p.m. where
10:04:18 we are hoping to seek public input on the vision of
10:04:22 Bayshore.
10:04:23 Speaking with David Smith, we have felt that in our
10:04:29 office to really strengthen the proposal to develop
10:04:33 the plans for the Bayshore overlay that it will be
10:04:37 important to establish those parameters in the
10:04:39 comprehensive plan.
10:04:41 And I know that we had talked with the neighborhood
10:04:45 groups that are supportive of the efforts, that they
10:04:49 want to do this quickly, and I think council and the
10:04:52 mayor's office has expressed a desire to have this
10:04:54 done rather quickly.
10:04:56 Six months.
10:04:57 To do the amendments through the comprehensive plan we
10:05:01 are anticipating it will probably take about nine
10:05:04 months.
10:05:05 Not much longer.

10:05:06 But I think in that effort it will be a much stronger
10:05:09 ability for us to develop land development regulations
10:05:15 that we need to guide growth along the Bayshore.
10:05:20 David Smith is here to answer any questions in that
10:05:24 regard, and I'm here to get council approval.
10:05:32 >>DAVID SMITH: City attorney.
10:05:34 I know you folks realize this but maybe some of the
10:05:36 viewers do not.
10:05:37 One of the advantages of a comp plan is it's fairly
10:05:41 debatable, it's a much easier test to meet.
10:05:44 Essentially the case law says if there's any reason
10:05:46 for what you have done and your comp plan changes it's
10:05:49 sustainable.
10:05:50 So legally, it's a much easier test.
10:05:53 As you know, rezoning, it's substantial, competent
10:05:57 evidence, and it can be a harder battle to sustain
10:06:00 sometimes.
10:06:01 So it's both a lesser threshold, plus it's more
10:06:05 palatable.
10:06:06 Because when it's in the comp plan, you cannot have
10:06:09 zonings contrary to the comp plan.
10:06:12 You can rezone, if you overlay simply a rezoning.

10:06:16 So it has much more efficacy in terms of what you are
10:06:20 trying to accomplish.
10:06:21 Lastly, if someone were to come in with a small-scale
10:06:24 plan amendment it requires a super majority which
10:06:28 means five of you.
10:06:29 So if the goal is to protect the Bayshore, that's a
10:06:31 more effective way to do it.
10:06:33 The extra three months, just from a personal opinion,
10:06:36 I don't think is too high a price to pay.
10:06:40 I think we can get there very quickly and I think we
10:06:42 will be successful.
10:06:44 I just want to give you that additional background.
10:06:47 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: David, I couldn't agree with you
10:06:49 more.
10:06:49 I kind of always envisioned that this would be sort of
10:06:52 a two-pronged approach in the comp plan as well as in
10:06:54 our zoning code.
10:06:56 I don't know if that's been the discussion that you
10:07:00 would put in the both.
10:07:01 I would hope so.
10:07:03 We will ultimately have to have land development
10:07:05 regulations implemented.

10:07:07 Some of the provisions perhaps.
10:07:10 >>> It depends on what happens with the comp plan.
10:07:12 I think the only question as to whether you proceed
10:07:15 now with the overlay is one of governmental resources.
10:07:18 I think if we are within three months of accomplishing
10:07:21 all of what we would accomplish in a comp plan rather
10:07:23 than an overlay, given all the other things we have
10:07:26 got going on, some of which we are going to be
10:07:28 bringing to you very shortly, and you will be somewhat
10:07:31 surprised.
10:07:32 I think that might be the most efficient way to do it.
10:07:34 And I don't think we have any likely candidates in the
10:07:37 interim.
10:07:38 I know of only one possible, and that's operating a
10:07:42 restaurant.
10:07:43 The other applications have been filed and dealt with
10:07:47 by the council.
10:07:48 So ultimately, we are envisioning comp plan first.
10:07:51 Any implementing regulations, if necessary, second,
10:07:55 rather than, you know, just trying to capture that
10:07:58 three-month differential with an overlay.
10:08:00 And you should realize, too, I think, zoning staff, in

10:08:04 your overall comp plan.
10:08:05 We are not going to wait for the update.
10:08:07 We are going to do this as a city initiated plan.
10:08:09 But in the overall comp plan, one of the things we are
10:08:12 going to try to do is address the issue of overlays
10:08:16 and address that in the comp plan, and not have as
10:08:19 many zoning overlays as we have, but just to be a
10:08:22 little bit of a patchwork is my understanding, a
10:08:24 little bit of a difficult process to apply.
10:08:27 >> While we are talking about it, I just wanted to
10:08:30 recognize several ladies in the back that have
10:08:33 initiated this effort in the Bayshore overlay district
10:08:37 committee, and thank them for their continued efforts.
10:08:41 And I know they are working with staff on this.
10:08:43 And I also wanted to reiterate for anybody who is
10:08:46 watching, I received recently ---and I'm sure other
10:08:50 council members have received phone calls from up and
10:08:52 down the Bayshore, various condos and other residents,
10:08:55 who are very, very excited about this effort.
10:08:58 And I just wanted to remind them what Gloria said,
10:09:01 that we'll have a meeting at Kate Jackson on August
10:09:04 10th at 6 p.m., and I'm sure we'll do some

10:09:07 advertising.
10:09:07 Maybe we can roll it on the channel 15 and that sort
10:09:11 of thing.
10:09:15 >>GLORIA MOREDA: I did want to say that, council, if
10:09:19 you would like a workshop discussion on the progress
10:09:22 we have made, maybe in mid to late October, because
10:09:26 we'll be submitting it to the Planning Commission in
10:09:28 November, that might be something you might want to
10:09:31 schedule on the agenda.
10:09:36 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I am always -- I think that Mr.
10:09:40 Smith's idea of putting this as part of our comp plan
10:09:43 is the way to go.
10:09:44 I hate the extra time.
10:09:46 And I would like your response whether it can impose a
10:09:53 short moratorium until we are able to get this done,
10:09:56 whether that would be appropriate.
10:09:57 I know it's been used in the past specifically on
10:09:59 Bayshore, specifically to look at this issue, 25 years
10:10:01 ago or more.
10:10:02 But I think that there might be some validity to that.
10:10:05 >>DAVID SMITH: We will look at that and see what we
10:10:10 can do.

10:10:10 The one we did most recently as you know is with
10:10:14 respect to JLUS there. Were specific concerns,
10:10:20 homeland security concerns and also the study was what
10:10:22 substantially along the path.
10:10:24 We may be substantially along the path with regard to
10:10:27 Bayshore, I don't know.
10:10:28 So it's typically fact driven.
10:10:31 I need to find out what the facts are and if we can I
10:10:35 will bring that back to you very quickly.
10:10:37 >> Do you need a motion to that effect or will you all
10:10:39 just bring it back?
10:10:40 >> It would probably be better for council to make a
10:10:43 motion so I have direction from council to look at the
10:10:45 possibility of a brief abatement process.
10:10:48 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: So moved.
10:10:52 >> Second.
10:10:52 >>GWEN MILLER: Motion and second.
10:10:54 >>SHAWN HARRISON: I am not going to support it.
10:10:57 There's a reason, a specific reason for a moratorium
10:11:04 for JLUS.
10:11:05 I think that is a very scary word to be throwing
10:11:07 around and I'm not even going to support you looking

10:11:09 at that as an option.
10:11:11 I think that what we are doing with the comp plan
10:11:14 amendment is fine.
10:11:15 I think that's widely supported.
10:11:20 Let's skin this cat an and if we start throwing around
10:11:23 other options, I think we take it in a very different
10:11:26 direction.
10:11:30 >>ROSE FERLITA: Going back to what we are trying to do
10:11:32 in terms of an overlay, David, I'm sorry, I am a
10:11:36 little confused.
10:11:37 When is the next time ware going to discuss that
10:11:40 issue?
10:11:41 >>DAVID SMITH: Where we are going next, I believe Ms.
10:11:44 Moreda indicated to you she will be back in November
10:11:46 with a report of what progress has been made with
10:11:48 regard to the comp plan amendment.
10:11:50 So what you are referring to as a zoning overlay, will
10:11:54 really be a comp plan amendment, a city initiated comp
10:11:57 plan amendment, which will address the entire length
10:12:00 of the Bayshore, in whatever the appropriate way is.
10:12:04 So it will be a comp plan as opposed to a overlay.
10:12:09 >>ROSE FERLITA: I don't mean to throw a wrench in this

10:12:11 and maybe I won't have the opportunity to.
10:12:13 I have done some extensive research on some issues
10:12:15 that have come up in the past.
10:12:17 Not prepared to discuss it today because I didn't have
10:12:19 enough time to do that specific homework.
10:12:22 Is that something that perhaps, if what I find is
10:12:26 important enough I can discuss it next week?
10:12:28 Or what?
10:12:31 >>> Council is always free, and any individual council
10:12:33 member is always free to bring issues up easily, yes,
10:12:36 ma'am.
10:12:37 I mean, you're talking about particularly your
10:12:39 legislative function.
10:12:40 >>ROSE FERLITA: Right.
10:12:41 But I think that there's some things that we haven't
10:12:43 looked at as we go forward on this overlay district.
10:12:46 And again, I'm not prepared to make presentation if
10:12:49 I'm not prepared.
10:12:50 But I think there's some things that should weigh into
10:12:53 this.
10:12:53 And I would like to do some more of that research and
10:12:56 perhaps bring it up under new business or old

10:12:58 business, because I think it is very germane to what
10:13:01 we are talking about.
10:13:01 >> And I think I could tell you that the staff will
10:13:06 commence the comp plan amendment immediately anyway,
10:13:08 because that's the best way to protect it.
10:13:11 If council still wants to go forward with an overlay
10:13:13 in the interim, then that's what council decides.
10:13:17 But I think the administration also wants to have it
10:13:19 in the comp plan.
10:13:20 And I think you do as well.
10:13:22 So I guess the question is whether you want to move
10:13:26 forward on two fronts or not.
10:13:28 And I think what I hear you say is you may.
10:13:30 >> I would really like to finalize the research I have
10:13:33 been doing because Bayshore is close to my home and is
10:13:36 important to all of us. But I would like maybe a
10:13:39 little more research, meet with you, and if it has
10:13:41 anything that is of any significant input, then I
10:13:45 would like to bring it up next week.
10:13:46 And I don't really know if that stops what we are
10:13:49 doing today, ladies and gentlemen.
10:13:50 I don't know.

10:13:51 But I think it's very important and I apologize.
10:13:53 I just had too many things to do this past week.
10:13:55 I don't want to give a report with something that's
10:13:58 just not --
10:14:00 >> There's a lot going on.
10:14:02 >> I know.
10:14:03 And that's okay, we can meet, David.
10:14:06 >>GWEN MILLER: Did you say you met with the neighbors
10:14:08 on this?
10:14:09 >>DAVID SMITH: We just briefly talked as -- with one
10:14:12 of the representatives beforehand, and their concern
10:14:14 is that the Bayshore is protected.
10:14:16 And that it is done in a manner that is effective as
10:14:20 possible and is enforceable, as enforceable as
10:14:23 possible:
10:14:27 I wouldn't want to say I have spoken with all the
10:14:29 neighbors but the people we spoke to were very
10:14:32 favorably inclined with the comp plan amendment
10:14:34 because it has the attractions I just articulated.
10:14:39 >> I guess what I would like to hear -- and we can
10:14:41 talk about this privately, you and me -- is if there's
10:14:44 any down-side to include it in both -- I definitely

10:14:48 want to include it in the comp plan.
10:14:51 I thought it was the original intent.
10:14:53 Also included in the zoning code.
10:14:54 But I'm being right up front.
10:14:56 I think we can put it in the zoning code before we
10:14:58 even have the comp plan amendments done, because it
10:15:01 wouldn't be inconsistent with the comp plan.
10:15:05 The comp plan amendments would really enhance and
10:15:07 bolster the changes we could make to the zoning code.
10:15:11 You and I can discuss it. 69 any other questions?
10:15:16 >>SHAWN HARRISON: I don't know what we are voting on.
10:15:18 Is this on a moratorium?
10:15:20 Or is this on a two-pronged approach to look at the
10:15:23 comp plan -- I mean the zoning code??
10:15:28 >> The only motion on the floor as I understood it was
10:15:30 for legal to look into a possibility of some kind of
10:15:33 abatement in the interim if we go with the comp plan.
10:15:35 That's the only motion on the floor.
10:15:40 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: And that would be to report back.
10:15:42 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Yes, that would be to report back
10:15:44 in three weeks?
10:15:48 >>DAVID SMITH: That would be fine.

10:15:50 Or two if I can get it.
10:15:52 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Mr. Harrison, I assume there will
10:15:54 be another one.
10:15:56 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Clearly I think the intent of the
10:16:02 motion is just to --
10:16:04 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Until we get some other regulation.
10:16:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: But also ask our staff to do the
10:16:09 research.
10:16:10 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: It might take three months to get
10:16:12 an abatement done, in which case is kind of not
10:16:17 generally worth doing.
10:16:18 >>GWEN MILLER: All right.
10:16:20 All in favor of the motion say Aye.
10:16:21 Opposed, Nay.
10:16:32 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: The subsequent motion would be to
10:16:36 ask the staff to look into doing a comp plan and
10:16:38 zoning changes to implement some sort of land use
10:16:40 change along Bayshore.
10:16:42 And I'm looking at October.
10:16:44 On October 19th, we don't have a night meeting.
10:16:46 So I would like to schedule a staff report on October
10:16:49 19th at 10 a.m.

10:16:52 >> Second.
10:16:53 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Maybe at the beginning of the
10:16:54 meeting under staff reports.
10:16:56 >>GWEN MILLER: Staff reports.
10:16:58 Motion and second.
10:17:00 >> We are scheduling a special meeting.
10:17:05 >> At 9:00.
10:17:06 >>SHAWN HARRISON: I thought you were scheduling a
10:17:10 night meeting.
10:17:10 >>GWEN MILLER: In a, saying we don't have one.
10:17:19 >>MARY ALVAREZ: On August 10th we won't be here.
10:17:23 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion on the floor.
10:17:24 We have a motion and second on the floor.
10:17:25 (Motion carried)
10:17:27 Okay, Ms. Alvarez.
10:17:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Gloria, you picked that date August
10:17:33 10th.
10:17:33 But council will be out of town.
10:17:35 Some council members might want to attend at Kate
10:17:38 Jackson.
10:17:40 >>GLORIA MOREDA: Okay.
10:17:41 I can check with Heather.

10:17:43 Would you all be able to attend, some of you?
10:17:47 >>ROSE FERLITA: Any of thaws would like to attend.
10:17:49 >>GWEN MILLER: We need to rescind that motion then.
10:17:53 >>GLORIA MOREDA: I know she sent out a notice to a
10:17:55 number of people that that she knows would -- knows
10:17:59 would be interested in attending.
10:18:01 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: A week later would be fine.
10:18:02 >>GWEN MILLER: Item number 5.
10:18:08 >> Good morning, assistant city attorney Toyin AINA
10:18:14 Hargrett.
10:18:15 You asked us to take a look at the doggy dining law.
10:18:22 The reason it's called the doggy dining law is it
10:18:24 permits a mechanism under which dog owners can attend
10:18:28 restaurants with their dogs.
10:18:29 The local control act, what it does is it provides an
10:18:32 exemption from the food and drug administration's
10:18:35 code, which prohibits dogs in restaurants.
10:18:38 The way that this program works is that it's
10:18:42 completely discretionary.
10:18:43 Local governments can choose to enact an ordinance
10:18:48 which must be in the Land Development Code, and the
10:18:53 act provides for certain permit requirements but we

10:18:56 have to include in that code should we choose to adopt
10:18:59 it, St. Petersburg has enacted a law on Thursday of
10:19:07 last week, pursuant to this new legislation.
10:19:10 So it would be entirely up to you, council, whether or
10:19:12 not the city is engaged in providing a mechanism.
10:19:17 Just so you know, it is a three-year pilot program and
10:19:21 it does sunset on July 1st of 2009.
10:19:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I was thinking about we would be
10:19:33 chasing our tail on this issue.
10:19:38 Is there anyone in the audience here that -- anyway,
10:19:45 the -- in all seriousness, I like what the legislature
10:19:50 did.
10:19:50 I think -- and just to explain the law a little bit.
10:19:55 There was some confusion last time it came up about
10:19:58 this law mandates, you know, all restaurants to allow
10:20:01 dogs in the restaurant.
10:20:02 And what it does, it allows restaurants who want to
10:20:08 participate to allow dogs in their outdoor patio
10:20:13 areas.
10:20:14 And they have to come in and do a permit application
10:20:17 to be part of that process.
10:20:19 In that way there can be extra inspection or whatever.

10:20:24 There are some parts of town, and there are some
10:20:26 restaurants, that I think might want to take advantage
10:20:28 of this.
10:20:29 I can envision perhaps out on Davis Island where folks
10:20:34 do have the patio eating at the restaurants, and there
10:20:37 might be some other places, Ybor or Seminole Heights
10:20:40 or anywhere in town, where there might be patio
10:20:43 restaurants where the restaurant owner might make the
10:20:46 decision that these patrons might like this.
10:20:48 And, therefore, I think we should, you know, give them
10:20:52 the option, give them the choice, give the restaurant
10:20:54 owners the choice and the freedom to make that
10:20:56 decision themselves.
10:20:58 >> I agree.
10:20:59 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Mary, Thank you.
10:21:03 So with that I'll go ahead and make a motion directing
10:21:06 staff to draft an ordinance, or appropriate ordinance,
10:21:11 and regulations, that the City of Tampa would be a
10:21:17 doggy dining city.
10:21:20 And I don't know how much time you need on that.
10:21:24 Maybe we could model of a St. Petersburg and go from
10:21:29 there.

10:21:29 What sort of time do you think?
10:21:32 >>> I would propose we bring it back on August
10:21:35 17th.
10:21:37 >>> That's good enough for me.
10:21:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: That's my motion.
10:21:40 >>ROSE FERLITA: Just to my same point.
10:21:47 I was just going to make some comments to Ms.
10:21:51 Hargrett.
10:21:52 Belated congratulations but congratulations
10:21:54 nonetheless.
10:21:55 I think this is a wonderful idea.
10:21:56 I'm sorry we are not first but that's okay.
10:21:58 St. Pete had a good idea and we are moving along.
10:22:01 That's great.
10:22:02 Lots of times it's between people who have dogs, as I
10:22:05 do, as many of my colleagues do here, and going to a
10:22:08 restaurant and sitting outside and certainly not being
10:22:12 inside and worrying about any health issues.
10:22:13 But sometimes it's a difference between sitting
10:22:15 outside or getting take-out to go home.
10:22:18 I think it's a wonderful idea.
10:22:20 And I think the point that John brought up is key to

10:22:22 why we should move on this.
10:22:23 It gives dog owners, like some of us, the opportunity
10:22:26 to sit outside with their dogs.
10:22:29 Davis Island is a wonderful example.
10:22:32 Because it's got that area that can be isolated.
10:22:35 And at the same time, it's the owner or the proprietor
10:22:39 of the business doesn't want this, it not something
10:22:41 that's being forcibly mandated on an eating
10:22:45 establishment.
10:22:45 I think it's great.
10:22:46 And I can't wait for this to finish off so we can do
10:22:51 that.
10:22:53 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Just a point of clarification.
10:22:56 When you mentioned at the option, should that be in
10:22:59 the motion itself?
10:23:01 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: We can put it in the motion but
10:23:03 it's inherent in the bill.
10:23:04 Yes.
10:23:05 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Just wanted to make sure because it
10:23:07 should be an option.
10:23:10 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Completely optional.
10:23:12 >>MARY ALVAREZ: To the restaurant owners.

10:23:14 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion and second.
10:23:16 (Motion carried).
10:23:17 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
10:23:21 would like to request reconsideration?
10:23:23 >> Bill Duval, 5408 branch Avenue, here representing
10:23:36 Tampa homeowners, association of neighborhoods.
10:23:38 You may recall that just last week there was a lot of
10:23:41 discussion on the update to the chapter 27, and
10:23:46 towards the end there were certain items that were
10:23:47 deleted for future discussion.
10:23:50 T.H.A.N. is under the impression that dash 98
10:23:53 regarding front porches was a part of that.
10:23:55 As we know, it turns out that it wasn't.
10:23:57 So through discussion, I was directed to come here to
10:24:02 see if we could get dash 98 among the other favor, I
10:24:08 believe it was, deleted from that document, so that we
10:24:12 could have more discussion on it.
10:24:13 And certainly in the 7 days since, there's been a lot
10:24:18 of misunderstanding.
10:24:20 And I think that emphasizes the fact that that Tim
10:24:24 needs to be held out and discussed as well.
10:24:29 >>SHAWN HARRISON: As the maker of the motion I was

10:24:31 quite surprised when I heard that that was not
10:24:33 included in the actual sections that I read into the
10:24:38 record.
10:24:39 And it certainly was my intent -- and I have not going
10:24:45 gone back and reviewed the tape.
10:24:48 When it was not included.
10:24:50 But I wrote it down.
10:24:52 It was on my notes to take 98 out.
10:24:55 I think that was the intention of everyone.
10:24:57 I think even Mr. Dingfelder who argued for this
10:25:00 provision agreed that let's send it back for 30 days,
10:25:05 and we'll just take, you know, take a look and make
10:25:07 sure everybody is comfortable.
10:25:09 So that was my intention.
10:25:11 I don't know procedurally what we need to do to get to
10:25:14 that point.
10:25:16 I want us to get to that point so that section it 98
10:25:19 is one of those that are going to go back and be
10:25:22 reviewed and come back to us in 30 days.
10:25:30 >>JULIA COLE: I remember when we went to the link it
10:25:32 wasn't specifically on there and if got to this then
10:25:35 that was my bad.

10:25:36 But tit at the time I am went back and reviewed it, it
10:25:38 was not.
10:25:39 But at this time if council votes to reconsider that
10:25:41 provision, at some point in the meeting I can
10:25:46 essentially bring the remainder back to reschedule
10:25:49 that.
10:25:54 Had the remainder come back probably at the next
10:25:56 meeting with the ordinance removing that and have that
10:25:59 readopted because it's part of the entire adaptive
10:26:02 ordinance.
10:26:03 So similarly to what we did the last time, I have to
10:26:07 remove that provision.
10:26:13 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Not to complicate things.
10:26:15 But what I wonder about is, it's my understanding that
10:26:20 the entire ordinance has been signed by the mayor now.
10:26:26 Because the clerk says it has.
10:26:28 And so I don't know if that changes your opinion in
10:26:32 terms of the reconsideration.
10:26:34 Now, with that said, I have had discussions with
10:26:39 T.H.A.N. representatives this week, when all of this
10:26:42 was hanging around.
10:26:43 And I completely committed to meet with them, to have

10:26:48 lengthy discussions with T.H.A.N. and with other folks
10:26:51 who were interested in the front porch issue, to
10:26:55 really hash this house, which is probably what I
10:26:57 should have done on the front end.
10:26:58 And I apologize to everybody for not having done that.
10:27:01 I still think it's a good thing.
10:27:03 But I want to work with the neighborhood organization
10:27:07 on this issue, see if we can't agree on this, then
10:27:11 maybe we can find a compromise position.
10:27:14 I've already committed to attending the next meeting
10:27:18 to discuss this.
10:27:19 But I don't know, because the mayor has already signed
10:27:21 this into law, I don't know if that changes anything
10:27:24 from a legal perspective.
10:27:29 >>JULIA COLE: If that would allow to us come back,
10:27:32 probably go to after lunch, that when could go ahead
10:27:34 and come back to you, and see where we are.
10:27:36 I think there may also be another issue.
10:27:38 There may be a scrivener's error in the ordinance as
10:27:41 well, that we may have to come back to you anyway.
10:27:44 So maybe Mr. Smith and I can take a look at this issue
10:27:53 and make sure -- to consider that scrivener's error.

10:27:58 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Two weeks?
10:28:02 >>JULIA COLE: We can try to bring it back after lunch
10:28:05 or this afternoon.
10:28:05 >>DAVID SMITH: Let us come back to you this afternoon,
10:28:08 because your ability to act may be different in two
10:28:10 weeks than it is today.
10:28:14 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Don't assume we'll be here after
10:28:16 lunch.
10:28:20 >>DAVID SMITH: I'll start working on it in the
10:28:22 interim.
10:28:22 >>GWEN MILLER: Just come back as quickly as possible.
10:28:28 Is there anyone in the public that wants to speak on
10:28:30 an item on the agenda not set for public hearing?
10:28:32 >>MARGARET VIZZI: 213 South Sherill.
10:28:40 I just wanted to find out if council feels that the
10:28:43 sign ordinance workshop will be probably after lunch,
10:28:50 the time that it is, and -- because I have to leave,
10:28:53 and I really wanted to be here for it.
10:28:55 So I wanted to come back if I could.
10:28:57 >>ROSE FERLITA: Ms. Vizzi, I think I misdirected you
10:29:00 because I was just -- looks like the chairman is going
10:29:03 to do that next?

10:29:05 >>GWEN MILLER: No, after the meeting.
10:29:07 We should be meeting on that in about 11:30 or quarter
10:29:11 of 12 because we don't have much to the agenda.
10:29:15 >>MARGARET VIZZI: Then I won't be able to be here.
10:29:22 >>GWEN MILLER: But as soon as we finish our agenda
10:29:25 then we go right into the sign.
10:29:27 >>ROSE FERLITA: The question, though, since it's going
10:29:29 to be one of those things like chapter 27 was, in that
10:29:33 amount of time, are we going to have enough time to
10:29:35 discuss this?
10:29:37 Julie, what do you think?
10:29:39 >>GWEN MILLER: Do you all want to come back after
10:29:40 lunch?
10:29:41 >>ROSE FERLITA: I don't care what council wants to do
10:29:44 but if there are some comprehensive changes to look
10:29:46 at, I don't think this is going to be the final-final
10:29:48 report.
10:29:49 >>GWEN MILLER: When we finish our agenda we said we
10:29:51 would go right into the workshop.
10:29:53 >>ROSE FERLITA: But what I'm saying because it's going
10:29:55 to be longer -- Ms. Vizzi has a question and she has
10:30:01 been very instrumental.

10:30:02 >>GWEN MILLER: We made a motion at the end of the
10:30:05 agenda.
10:30:06 We can't move it up.
10:30:07 >>ROSE FERLITA: But what I'm saying if it's noon do we
10:30:13 come back?
10:30:13 Because it will be longer than noon.
10:30:16 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I am so grateful for Ms. Ferlita
10:30:18 for leading this whole sign committee effort.
10:30:20 And I don't want us to not give it the full attention
10:30:26 that it deserves.
10:30:27 And I think that if it's more comfortable in terms of
10:30:32 Ms. Advise toy speak to it now, I would rather you
10:30:36 speak now, and then you be allowed to speak later.
10:30:52 And there are many good things, representation on both
10:30:54 sides, and we compromised on both sides.
10:30:57 So I just wanted to encourage council to the workshop
10:31:01 to listen and hopefully other members will be able to
10:31:04 be here to encourage to you do the same.
10:31:07 And if I find out, I will call to find out if it will
10:31:11 be at 1:30, if you will take a lunch break before you
10:31:16 hear it, I will come back at that time.
10:31:18 But if not, I just wanted you to -- to encourage you

10:31:22 to move it along.
10:31:24 Because it's a lot of good things that I think will be
10:31:26 gad for the city.
10:31:29 >>JULIA COLE: And I did want to thank Ms. Vizzi.
10:31:31 She was a huge part of this.
10:31:33 And I hope she can be back for when we speak about it.
10:31:37 But I also want to let council know this will not be
10:31:39 the first conversation about it.
10:31:41 This is really bringing back to you where we ended up.
10:31:46 We will be continuing forward and we'll see where we
10:31:50 get at the end of the day.
10:31:51 And then we will have additional public hearings, the.
10:32:00 This is the beginning, not the end.
10:32:02 But again, Ms. Vizzi and everybody else worked so hard
10:32:06 and I think it was a wonderful experience.
10:32:09 >>GWEN MILLER: Would anyone else like to speak?
10:32:11 >>JOHN GRANDOFF: Suite 3700 Bank of America plaza. I
10:32:22 would like to speak on item 4, which discussed the
10:32:26 overlay district for Bayshore.
10:32:28 I represent several property owners on Bayshore that
10:32:33 asked me to participate in these discussions.
10:32:35 And we look forward to attending the discussions at

10:32:38 Kate Jackson park next month.
10:32:41 I would like you, as you are thinking about this issue
10:32:44 in the next coming months, realize that there's an
10:32:48 expansive right-of-way on Bayshore that is already
10:32:52 city property and can certainly be taken advantage of
10:32:54 in a public works project.
10:32:56 You can think of many excellent rights-of-way from the
10:33:08 champs in Paris to brickle Avenue in Miami.
10:33:12 And to have creative discussion busy city right-of-way
10:33:16 and improve that, that's certainly the idea.
10:33:19 Our clients do not want to bear the loss of any
10:33:22 property rights without compensation based on what
10:33:24 their existing zoning is today.
10:33:26 And this is important as to the moratorium issue that
10:33:29 Ms. Saul-Sena brought up.
10:33:31 If the intent of the City Council is to improve the
10:33:34 vista of the Bayshore and not to impact anyone's
10:33:37 property rights then there's in a need for a
10:33:40 moratorium.
10:33:42 My clients are moving forward with any project, as you
10:33:45 did in the MacDill study area which is certainly a
10:33:48 good idea to have an abatement in that area.

10:33:51 But your intent is to start today and not impact
10:33:55 property rights but in fact improve the vista and what
10:33:58 already exists on Bayshore, then so be it.
10:34:01 But a moratorium sends out a very dig different signal
10:34:05 that someone who is trying to exercise some rights may
10:34:09 not be able to do that whale you get your zoning and
10:34:11 comp plan house in order.
10:34:12 I only ask you to keep that in mind, and that we are
10:34:17 all for improving Bayshore, but not at a cost that is
10:34:23 not compensated.
10:34:24 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank you.
10:34:26 Would anyone else like to speak?
10:34:27 No one else to like to speak?
10:34:30 We go to our committee reports.
10:34:31 Public safety, Ms. Rose Ferlita.
10:34:34 >>ROSE FERLITA: I would like to move resolutions 7
10:34:36 through 9.
10:34:38 >> Second.
10:34:38 (Motion carried).
10:34:38 >>GWEN MILLER: Parks and recreation, Mary Alvarez.
10:34:43 >>MARY ALVAREZ: I would like to move items 10 through
10:34:46 12.

10:34:47 >> Second.
10:34:48 (Motion carried).
10:34:48 >>GWEN MILLER: Public works, Mr. John Dingfelder.
10:34:52 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'll move items 13 through 19.
10:34:55 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Second.
10:34:57 (Motion carried).
10:34:58 >>GWEN MILLER: Finance Committee, Mr. Kevin White.
10:35:01 >>KEVIN WHITE: Move 20 through 25.
10:35:06 >> Second.
10:35:06 (Motion carried).
10:35:07 >>GWEN MILLER: Building and zoning, Ms. Linda
10:35:09 Saul-Sena.
10:35:10 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I would like to move resolutions
10:35:13 26 -- wow -- through 42.
10:35:24 >> Second.
10:35:24 (Motion carried).
10:35:25 >>GWEN MILLER: Transportation, Mr. Shawn Harrison.
10:35:29 >>SHAWN HARRISON: I would like to move items 43
10:35:31 through 47.
10:35:32 >> Second.
10:35:32 (Motion carried).
10:35:32 >>SHAWN HARRISON: I would like to set the new

10:35:37 hearings, items 48 -- well, just 48.
10:35:42 >> Second.
10:35:42 (Motion carried).
10:35:43 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
10:35:47 wants to speak on items 49 through 60?
10:35:50 Will you please stand and raise your right hand?
10:35:52 (Oath administered by Clerk).
10:36:04 >>GWEN MILLER: We need to open item 49.
10:36:07 >> So moved.
10:36:08 >> Second.
10:36:08 (Motion carried).
10:36:09 >>ROSE FERLITA: I don't know if I can do this or not.
10:36:11 I just want to make a comment about something I just
10:36:13 moved.
10:36:14 Can I do that real quick?
10:36:15 Linda, you moved item 28, correct?
10:36:17 And I just want to say that if this is what I am
10:36:23 looking at, I think it is, that this is a perfect way
10:36:25 to go forward and partner with the private sector to
10:36:27 get something done.
10:36:28 And I think it's just a wonderful, wonderful project.
10:36:31 And people have been working on this without

10:36:34 recognition at this point, it's a wonderful thing to
10:36:36 do because the private sector cooperated and benefited
10:36:42 from it, too.
10:36:42 It's just great.
10:36:45 >>JAMES COOK: Land Development Coordination.
10:36:47 I have been sworn.
10:36:48 Petitioner is requesting to vacate an alley running
10:36:50 from 22nd street to 24th street, between 18th
10:36:57 Avenue and 17th Avenue.
10:36:59 The Elmo highlighted, petitioner's property on both
10:37:03 sides,.
10:37:10 This shot of the alley along petitioner's property.
10:37:13 The building on the north side and on the south side.
10:37:21 This is looking east. This continues east at 24th
10:37:24 street.
10:37:31 This is a shot of the alley log west from the rear of
10:37:34 petitioner's property towards 22nd street.
10:37:37 The property once again had property on both sides of
10:37:40 the alley.
10:37:41 The alley doesn't actually access.
10:37:45 This portion here you see, even though it's private
10:37:52 property people have been driving on it like an alley.

10:37:58 It dead-ends into that telephone pole.
10:38:01 I'll show you that shot, which is this shot here.
10:38:06 This is continuing east towards 24th street.
10:38:11 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Is that part of the vacating?
10:38:13 >>> This is the request to be vacated, yes, ma'am.
10:38:16 And I'll show you the other end.
10:38:19 This is the alleyway from west to 24th street.
10:38:22 Petitioner's property at the other end.
10:38:25 The west end.
10:38:29 This is the same shot, alley across 24th.
10:38:32 This is not subject to vacating.
10:38:34 It shows the alley continuing east across 24th
10:38:37 street.
10:38:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: So if the alley is vacated that is
10:38:43 right across what we are looking at?
10:38:45 >>> This is not subject to the vacating.
10:38:50 This property owner could fence across there and stop
10:38:53 anybody from going across.
10:38:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Mr. Cook,
10:38:58 >> Do any of those property owners have rear access?
10:39:04 >>> There are a couple of gates back there, secondary
10:39:06 access.

10:39:06 I notice there are uses in the rear of the property.
10:39:12 >> It looks like this alley is --
10:39:16 >>> There's tracks along the alley so people do drive
10:39:19 up and down the alley.
10:39:25 This is a shot of petitioner's property.
10:39:27 The alley is just north of this building.
10:39:32 This is the building south side of the alleyway.
10:39:38 This is the rear of petitioner's property abutting the
10:39:41 alley.
10:39:41 This area right here is being used as an alley
10:39:44 although it's not officially a dedicated alley.
10:39:46 People are driving it -- on it, treating it as a
10:39:50 north-south alleyway.
10:39:54 It runs right here.
10:39:56 North-south along this building.
10:40:00 This is a shot looking north along petitioner's rear
10:40:03 property line.
10:40:04 This is 17th Avenue to the south.
10:40:06 This is the area people were driving on, north-south,
10:40:10 treating it as an alley, that's private property.
10:40:15 This is a shot looking south along the property line.
10:40:20 It looks like an alley.

10:40:22 Although it's not an alley, it's private property.
10:40:24 That's not subject to the vacating.
10:40:26 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there a dumpster right this?
10:40:28 Who use that is dumpster?
10:40:29 >>> Dumpster belongs to this business here.
10:40:31 Petitioner's property.
10:40:33 And that's a shot of petitioner's property along 22nd
10:40:38 street.
10:40:38 This is in the East Tampa overlay district, a total of
10:40:42 551 alleys, of those alleys 400 are still open and 151
10:40:46 have been vacated.
10:40:48 Staff has no objection to this vacating as long as
10:40:50 utility easements are reserved.
10:40:59 >>> I prepared an ordinance in anticipation of the
10:41:02 hearing, presented at ordinance to the city clerk.
10:41:04 I have a copy for council.
10:41:07 >>GWEN MILLER: Petitioner?
10:41:07 >> Jose ROJAS, I have been sworn.
10:41:31 The placement of the alley as it was shown just a
10:41:34 moment ago is a little bit off.
10:41:37 It actually runs adjacent to the building that's on
10:41:39 the north end of the property.

10:41:44 The problem I have been having is, A, it bisects the
10:41:48 property.
10:41:49 Secondly, as staff was relating.
10:41:53 The people that do use the alley coming out of the
10:41:56 back of their properties, they have two Avenues to
10:41:59 travel.
10:41:59 They can go to 24th or to 22nd.
10:42:02 The one that is are coming to 22nd, instead of
10:42:04 continuing to along with what would be the alley
10:42:09 adjacent to the building reaching the back of the
10:42:12 property, they are turning and going either north or
10:42:14 south, and basically using the properties as a
10:42:19 throughway.
10:42:19 In addition to that, and because of that, we have had
10:42:22 a continuing problem.
10:42:26 The dumpster that you saw a moment ago, that picture
10:42:29 happened to be taken at a good time.
10:42:31 We are always having people dumping on or around this
10:42:34 dumpster.
10:42:34 We actually had it removed a couple of days ago to see
10:42:37 if that could stem the flow.
10:42:39 The previous owner had told me that wouldn't stem the

10:42:41 flow, the only thing that would stem the flow would be
10:42:44 if we would fence the back of the property.
10:42:46 But we are not able to do that obviously because the
10:42:48 alley bisects the property as is set forth and
10:42:56 platted, if you will.
10:42:57 That's why we are asking for a vacated property.
10:43:01 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: When did you purchase the property?
10:43:03 >>> In October.
10:43:05 >> Of 2005?
10:43:07 >>> Yes, sir.
10:43:07 >> Were you aware that the alley vacated bisected the
10:43:11 alley you were purchasing?
10:43:12 >>> I did.
10:43:13 Yes, I knew there was an alley there.
10:43:15 I wasn't aware of the fact that it was going to create
10:43:19 a problem with basically dumping, without being able
10:43:22 to put some sort of a fence to keep people off the
10:43:26 property.
10:43:26 >> You could fence the two properties separately right
10:43:34 now and keep people off of your property, correct?
10:43:40 And leave the alley unfenced, that you could fence the
10:43:43 two properties that you own on either side of the

10:43:45 alley.
10:43:45 >> The one property is actually several different --
10:43:51 there's three of them.
10:43:52 One of them is actually bisected by the alley.
10:43:55 So I could not run a fence around the one parcel of
10:43:58 property.
10:43:59 I think in the pictures you saw, there was two
10:44:01 buildings.
10:44:02 One of those buildings is actually on one property.
10:44:04 That property line ends almost adjacent to the
10:44:06 building because it was built back before.
10:44:10 But the larger building on the north side of the
10:44:12 property actually runs across the alley and comes --
10:44:17 it stops just short of the smaller building which
10:44:20 would be on the south end of the property.
10:44:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: FHP we did not approve your -- the
10:44:29 vacating request -- well, let me start with a more
10:44:33 basic question.
10:44:34 You indicate add minute ago that the folks who live up
10:44:38 the alley use the alley?
10:44:41 >>> There's two people that live on the alley that do
10:44:43 come out the back of the property.

10:44:45 And originally, just when I was trying to vacate the
10:44:53 alley, my actual request was just to vacate that
10:44:56 portion that bisects my property.
10:44:58 But I was told that I had to go for a vacating of the
10:45:01 whole property, and that that would be a fallback
10:45:04 position if the transportation easement was necessary.
10:45:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Mr. Cook, when we face add similar
10:45:14 situation like this, I think it was in Palmetto Beach
10:45:16 a couple months ago, you came up with a creative
10:45:19 solution to help the property owner at the end of the
10:45:21 alley who has had a similar situation, without
10:45:27 actually -- I don't know, what did we do?
10:45:30 Do you remember that?
10:45:31 >>JAMES COOK: It was a 15-foot alleyway and the
10:45:34 abutting owner only needed 5 feet to make the lot
10:45:37 buildable by code, 100-foot depth, vacated a 5-foot
10:45:41 strip leaving the remaining --
10:45:44 >> Do you have a creative solution on this where we
10:45:46 wouldn't actually close the alley to the neighbors?
10:45:49 >>> One of the abutting owners was telling me he owns
10:45:52 this lot at the very east end.
10:45:53 The abutting owner has no parking in the front.

10:45:58 They have a front door on the sidewalk.
10:46:00 But they have a double gate in the back.
10:46:02 And they do park in the rear.
10:46:04 The alley is 450 feet long.
10:46:07 If we -- that's a long way to back out.
10:46:11 I would suggest since the rear of his property is
10:46:15 already in use as an alley, it's paved as an alley, if
10:46:21 you would be willing to give up maybe 10-foot of the
10:46:23 transportation easement total rear to be able to fence
10:46:25 on the west side of that, block the dumpster off, the
10:46:28 east-west alley would still be open, and than way the
10:46:35 alley can still function and headed north at 18th
10:46:39 Avenue.
10:46:41 Whether or not they had enough property there, if
10:46:44 there's some zoning code that we would have to meet
10:46:46 the setbacks and all that, we have to look at that.
10:46:49 >> Do you understand what Mr. Cook just described?
10:46:55 I guess he's saying if you give up on that side, then
10:46:59 we'll give you what's in between the two buildings.
10:47:02 >>JAMES COOK: It would just be an easement.
10:47:05 It wouldn't be in fee.
10:47:06 It's already acting as an alley.

10:47:08 It appears that people are driving on it anyway.
10:47:12 >>> My question would be understanding your point
10:47:13 about backing out the alley and I really don't think
10:47:17 that would be an issue.
10:47:20 Anyone who drives into that alley to access the
10:47:24 property, I don't believe that --
10:47:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Bottom line as a city, we have a
10:47:32 policy we don't want to dead-end these alleys.
10:47:34 So it needs an egress point.
10:47:37 What Mr. Cook is suggesting is the possibility of
10:47:39 creating an egress point on the side of your building.
10:47:43 And then we could go ahead and consider vacating
10:47:45 between your two buildings.
10:47:46 It's sort of a compromise.
10:47:52 >>> Okay.
10:47:52 Without going back and --
10:47:56 >> It's not something we could do at this moment.
10:47:59 >>> I'm not sure I could committee commit to that
10:48:01 compromise although I appreciate the compromise,
10:48:03 without going back and doing a little investigation
10:48:08 for the uses that we have done.
10:48:10 >> How about if we continued it for about a month, and

10:48:13 you and Mr. Cook look at it?
10:48:15 >> Great, if we could minimize -- whatever would be
10:48:20 convenient.
10:48:23 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
10:48:24 wants to speak on item 49?
10:48:28 >>> Gary Smith.
10:48:33 I don't really have much to input into this.
10:48:36 I just purchased the empty lot right there.
10:48:38 I just happened to notice the signs saying that there
10:48:40 was going to be a meeting here.
10:48:42 And I also noticed that the property owner next to me,
10:48:45 who is selling their property at the moment, uses the
10:48:48 alleyway to park in the back, and they park on my
10:48:52 property also because it's an empty lot.
10:48:54 I was going to fence my lot which means they would not
10:48:56 be able to drive onto my lot to get to their place,
10:48:59 which means they have to go through the alley.
10:49:01 I thought I saw another entrance to the alley behind
10:49:06 the house somewhere, but it may not be an alleyway.
10:49:09 It may be somewhere that they are using as an
10:49:11 alleyway.
10:49:12 I guess someone will just have to look into it and see

10:49:14 what it was.
10:49:15 But I don't have an objection, it just means more lot
10:49:20 for me.
10:49:21 But I just wanted to just find out exactly what was
10:49:24 going on.
10:49:25 >>GWEN MILLER: Next.
10:49:35 >>> Benjamin hotel, I own one of the properties.
10:49:43 For the possible closure.
10:49:44 And I use that alley.
10:49:49 So it would affect me if you close the whole alley.
10:49:52 A partial closure, I could live with that.
10:49:55 But I would like access.
10:50:01 I go in and out.
10:50:03 >>GWEN MILLER: Have you been sworn, sir?
10:50:06 >>> Yes.
10:50:07 >>GWEN MILLER: Would anyone else like to speak?
10:50:10 Mr. Dingfelder?
10:50:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I think that we can work out a
10:50:13 compromise.
10:50:15 I would like to suggest that he and Mr. Cook -- three
10:50:22 weeks, work on this, for a three-week continuance.
10:50:25 >>GWEN MILLER: Motion and second for a three-week

10:50:28 continuance.
10:50:28 (Motion carried).
10:50:30 Item 50.
10:50:31 >>JULIA COLE: Before we move onto our next public
10:50:34 hearing.
10:50:34 Mr. Shelby would be upset if I don't read that
10:50:37 statement.
10:50:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: And he didn't leave you the hat.
10:50:44 >>> He didn't leave me the hat and I don't know where
10:50:46 the sign is.
10:50:46 I ask that all written communication relative to
10:50:48 today's public hearings which have been available for
10:50:51 public inspection in City Council's office be received
10:50:53 and filed into the record at this time.
10:50:59 Any members of council that have had any verbal
10:51:02 communication with any petitioner, his or her
10:51:04 representative, or any member of the public in
10:51:05 connection with any of today's hearings, that member
10:51:09 of council should, prior to the action, disclose.
10:51:12 The person or persons, groups or entities with whom
10:51:16 the verbal communication occurred and the substance of
10:51:17 the verbal communication, those who will be testifying

10:51:22 through the hearing, I ask that you state your name,
10:51:25 please also reaffirm that you have been sworn, and I
10:51:28 am not really sure where the sign is.
10:51:31 And I will make sure to confirm that everybody is
10:51:35 informed, if they -- has been sworn if they haven't
10:51:38 said it on the record.
10:51:39 >>HEATHER LAMBOY: Good morning, council.
10:51:41 Land development.
10:51:42 I have been sworn.
10:51:42 The subject property is located at 4830 North Florida
10:51:45 Avenue.
10:51:46 You recall this is continued at the June 8th
10:51:49 hearing to work out some technical issues.
10:51:51 The site is for the Air Masters business located on
10:51:57 the corner of Louisiana and Florida.
10:51:59 The commercial intense tiff corridor with a little bit
10:52:02 of commercial general, and abutting residential.
10:52:05 The request is for parking lot and RS-50 zone, is
10:52:09 located immediately adjacent to the commercial parcel
10:52:12 for the Air Masters site.
10:52:15 The technical issues is protecting some trees.
10:52:19 And changes have been made to the site plan that

10:52:24 reflect one-way exists that protect the 30-inch tree,
10:52:32 and there was another minor technical issue related to
10:52:37 stormwater.
10:52:38 So, therefore, staff has no objections.
10:52:40 That concludes staff comments.
10:52:43 >>GWEN MILLER: Petitioner?
10:52:46 Petitioner?
10:52:47 Is the petitioner here?
10:52:58 >>> Michael Horner, Dale Mabry.
10:53:02 I have been sworn, Julia.
10:53:04 The ongoing joke, I have done better when I don't
10:53:08 appear than when I actually appear.
10:53:11 Steve Michelini offered to hide me, but I see my icon.
10:53:17 You will recall we had one issue, a transportation
10:53:22 conflict.
10:53:23 To address that issue by increasing that separation.
10:53:26 We also saved two trees that were inquired about, by
10:53:36 taking out nonconform and conforming them.
10:53:39 So we are now moving to the brand gnaw building
10:53:46 completely enclosed, parking, concrete wall, save a
10:53:50 tree, access worked out.
10:53:52 We thank you for your help.

10:54:00 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
10:54:01 wants to speak on item 50?
10:54:03 >>> Joe Elsworth, president of south Seminole Heights
10:54:09 civic association.
10:54:11 The Air Masters project does lie within our district.
10:54:14 And our Board of Directors has reviewed this.
10:54:16 We feel this is certainly a positive to Florida Ave.
10:54:21 which is in sore need of improvement and the
10:54:23 neighborhood association supports this.
10:54:25 >>GWEN MILLER: Would anyone else like to speak?
10:54:27 We need to close the public hearing.
10:54:29 >>MARY ALVAREZ: So moved.
10:54:30 >> Second.
10:54:30 (Motion carried).
10:54:31 >>GWEN MILLER: We have an ordinance.
10:54:35 Mr. White.
10:54:36 >>KEVIN WHITE: Move an ordinance approving a special
10:54:38 use permit S-2 approving an off-street commercial
10:54:42 parking lot in the CI commercial intensive in RS-50
10:54:45 single family zoning district in the general vicinity
10:54:48 of 4830 North Florida Avenue in the city of tap and as
10:54:50 more particularly described in section 1 hereof

10:54:53 allowing access to a local street providing an
10:54:56 effective date.
10:54:58 >>GWEN MILLER: Motion and second.
10:54:59 (Motion carried)
10:55:00 Item 51 is a continued public hearing.
10:55:05 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I was attempted to vote against him
10:55:08 just for fun.
10:55:15 >>> Marty McDonald, land development.
10:55:18 I have not been sworn.
10:55:21 (Oath administered by Clerk) in front of you is
10:55:33 Z-06-48, a request to rezone property from RM-16 to
10:55:39 commercial neighborhood -- I'm sorry, neighborhood
10:55:44 commercial/office.
10:55:47 The petitioner -- excuse me, the location of the
10:55:50 property is 2114 west Columbus drive.
10:55:54 The property is located along the Columbus drive
10:55:56 corridor, which is predominantly a mixture of
10:55:58 commercial and residential uses.
10:56:00 The subject property is surrounded by CI zoning
10:56:03 district to the north, east and west.
10:56:07 The property is located on the subject site is RM-16.
10:56:11 There are two existing buildings on-site that are

10:56:13 currently used as professional offices.
10:56:18 It originally had been zoned C-2.
10:56:23 We have build RM-16.
10:56:28 The commercial use or the offices have been there
10:56:32 prior to the RM-16 zoning.
10:56:34 So what they are doing, petitioner is requesting now
10:56:36 to come into conformance with the uses that they have
10:56:41 historically had there.
10:56:44 Let me show you on the zoning map.
10:56:50 This is the subject site.
10:56:51 We have Columbus Avenue.
10:56:53 This is Armenia to the west.
10:56:56 And Albany to the east.
10:57:00 If you look carefully here -- I know it's small
10:57:02 print -- you will see this area of RM-16.
10:57:06 It shoots up along Columbus.
10:57:09 You have an area of CI adjacent to this property.
10:57:12 And up again.
10:57:13 And then back down.
10:57:16 Originally the petitioner was going to come in for
10:57:19 either CG rezoning or CI rezoning.
10:57:22 This parcel is only 9,500 square feet.

10:57:27 And the requirement is 10,000 square feet.
10:57:29 So you have to come in as a commercial neighborhood
10:57:31 instead of what you see along the corridor and beyond.
10:57:35 It is located within the West Tampa overlay district.
10:57:39 There are design standards that apply.
10:57:43 We have as stab staff no objection to the site.
10:57:49 They are not going to mach any additional improvements
10:57:52 so there are waivers in conjunction with it.
10:57:54 And that is they are asking to reduce the southerly
10:57:56 landscape buffer from five feet to zero.
10:57:59 And the area of green space they are asking to reduce,
10:58:04 have a waiver from that.
10:58:06 And also on the minimal recommended amount of trees
10:58:09 because of the site is constrained.
10:58:12 Let me show you the aerial.
10:58:18 Subject site, Columbus.
10:58:19 This is the existing building.
10:58:21 And there is a building, you can't really see it in
10:58:24 the shade here.
10:58:25 But there's a building right here.
10:58:29 You are looking at Columbus east on the Elmo.
10:58:32 And this is directly across the street to the

10:58:35 commercial use.
10:58:40 Here is a picture of the site.
10:58:43 That is a view looking west on Columbus.
10:58:46 Again, across the street.
10:58:49 Across the street.
10:58:55 Subject site.
10:58:56 This is that second building to the rear.
10:59:02 Just a view of how the site exists with the parking.
10:59:07 This is the subject to the east.
10:59:09 It is a commercial use.
10:59:17 To the west this is CI commercial.
10:59:19 Planning Commission has no objection to this request.
10:59:24 >>GWEN MILLER: Petitioner?
10:59:32 Joseph Diaz, West Kennedy Boulevard.
10:59:36 And I have not been sworn in.
10:59:40 (Oath administered by Clerk)
10:59:40 I'm here today on behalf of the owner of the property
10:59:52 at 2114 west Columbus drive, Fred Papia.
10:59:59 All of the property on Columbus drive from the west
11:00:01 side of the river to Armenia, with the exception of
11:00:07 these two lots, and these three lots, two of which are
11:00:11 before you, are all zoned CI.

11:00:15 We would love to have zoned this property CI.
11:00:18 But we felt that would have just made the whole area
11:00:21 consistent.
11:00:23 So we have modified our petition and ask for CM.
11:00:29 It's an existing location.
11:00:31 It has two structures on it.
11:00:34 Staff had certain recommendations and we adopted all
11:00:37 of our recommendations.
11:00:40 We would humbly request you approve this CI
11:00:46 application.
11:00:46 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
11:00:48 wants to speak on item 51?
11:00:59 >>> Janice Williams.
11:00:59 I have been sworn in.
11:01:00 I'm at 1902 west St. Conrad speak and the president of
11:01:06 the old Tampa neighborhood recreation and crime watch.
11:01:11 I believe council members received an e-mail message
11:01:14 from me indicating that while there was general
11:01:16 approval for this, I guess the people in the area
11:01:21 didn't know what was going to happen with the
11:01:26 building, if the building was going to be raised.
11:01:29 And from me, my concern was just parking issues,

11:01:32 because it seemed quite tight there.
11:01:35 There are people living -- I know that parts were
11:01:42 designated CI on the west side.
11:01:44 People live in that house.
11:01:46 So their concern is if there were going to be any type
11:01:49 of changes to the property, that their needs be taken
11:01:55 into consideration, if there is going to be any
11:01:58 problems with building, dust, anything like that.
11:02:01 But parking is an issue for me.
11:02:03 But if the property has been used in the past for
11:02:07 commercial use, maybe that's not important to you all.
11:02:11 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Since you have been here today and
11:02:14 you heard the plans of the petitioner, are you
11:02:16 comfortable with the buffering that's a forwarded the
11:02:19 residential to the south of this parcel?
11:02:22 Are you comfortable with the buffering in between the
11:02:27 parcelling and the residential property?
11:02:31 >>> As long as there are no changes.
11:02:33 As long as they are going to use the building as is.
11:02:37 I don't have a problem with it.
11:02:42 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: This request is for a zoning
11:02:44 category that doesn't think to whether -- speak to

11:02:47 whether there will be changes to the land use but
11:02:49 maybe after you speak the petitioner can come up and
11:02:52 clarify.
11:02:56 >>MARTY BOYLE McDONALD: Land development.
11:02:57 Commercial neighborhood is a site plan controlled
11:03:01 district.
11:03:03 So what you see before you is how it happened to be
11:03:07 named.
11:03:07 So as it is, as existing conditions, they are just
11:03:11 really trying to come into conformance with what the
11:03:13 use has always been and had originally been C-2 before
11:03:18 that.
11:03:20 >>MARY ALVAREZ: And the report says that the buildings
11:03:22 are -- no decisions.
11:03:26 I'm comfortable with the staff recommendation.
11:03:31 >>KEVIN WHITE: Move to close.
11:03:33 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone else that wants to
11:03:35 speak?
11:03:36 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Move to close.
11:03:38 >> Second.
11:03:38 (Motion carried).
11:03:39 >>MARY ALVAREZ: An ordinance rezoning property in the

11:03:46 general vicinity of 2114 west Columbus drive in the
11:03:50 city of Tampa, Florida and more particularly described
11:03:52 in RM-16 residential multifamily to CM commercial
11:03:59 neighborhood providing an effective date.
11:04:03 (Motion Carried).
11:04:03 >>GWEN MILLER: We are going to go back to item number
11:04:05 6 which was supposed to be held at 11:00 o'clock.
11:04:15 Cathy Coyle, are you going to be the spokesperson?
11:04:26 >>CATHERINE COYLE: Land development.
11:04:27 I would love to introduce the mayor of our wonderful
11:04:30 city.
11:04:31 Mayor Pam Iorio.
11:04:33 She has some opening words.
11:04:38 >>MAYOR PAM IORIO: Good morning, council members.
11:04:40 I am so pleased to be here today to introduce the
11:04:42 topic of the land use study and we have a very
11:04:49 positive recommendation to make to Tampa City Council
11:04:51 and in the process that you will take with the public
11:04:53 hearing.
11:04:54 First, we can't overstate the important of MacDill
11:04:57 Air Force Base to our community.
11:04:58 It has an economic impact of 6.5 million a year and it

11:05:07 helps to set the tone, the tenor of our entire
11:05:10 community and it's so critical that we always protect
11:05:12 the future of MacDill Air Force Base.
11:05:16 Now, one of the issues that has often been in the
11:05:19 forefront of other communities, when they have lost
11:05:22 their military bases, has been land use encroachment
11:05:25 on the base.
11:05:26 And so I think it was probably over a year ago, we set
11:05:31 up a land use committee under the auspices of the
11:05:36 military sets up these sorts of land use committees
11:05:39 called JLU to examine the land uses around MacDill
11:05:44 Air Force Base to see what recommendations we can make
11:05:47 for the long-term.
11:05:49 Now, we were so fortunate to have a great committee,
11:05:54 colonel Margaret Woodward is here today. Of course
11:05:57 now she leads MacDill Air Force Base and we are so
11:06:00 fortunate to have her, and she was active on our
11:06:03 committee and she is here today and will be making
11:06:05 comments.
11:06:06 Councilman John Dingfelder was a member of the
11:06:08 committee.
11:06:08 And of course added a great deal to the discussion

11:06:10 with his extensive knowledge of all the land use and
11:06:13 the zoning issues.
11:06:15 County commissioner Cathy castor was also on the
11:06:18 committee.
11:06:18 And she also did a great job.
11:06:20 And so the four of us along with a great deal of help
11:06:24 from the staff and the community came up with some key
11:06:26 recommendations.
11:06:27 I think it's very important to note -- and the staff
11:06:30 is going to give you a PowerPoint presentation -- we
11:06:33 have the clear zone, APZ-1 and APZ-2.
11:06:38 Probably a lot of people don't know they lived for
11:06:39 many years in APZ-1 or 2, and I think part of the
11:06:43 process you are ready to embark on in these public
11:06:46 hearings is going to be a public awareness process, so
11:06:48 that many people will recognize where they live, in
11:06:51 conjunction with the Air Force Base and what that
11:06:56 means to them long-term.
11:06:57 It's very important to us as a committee that we not
11:06:59 affect anyone's current property rights as they exist
11:07:01 today.
11:07:02 I know that would be important to you, too.

11:07:09 If someone has a home or a duplex, whatever situation,
11:07:13 in APZ-1 or 2, they retain. That if it gets destroyed
11:07:17 in a storm they have the right to rebuild that.
11:07:19 But what our recommendations to you say is we don't
11:07:22 want to increase densities in those two areas.
11:07:25 It's very important that people not be able to rezone
11:07:27 a single-family lot into four or five town homes, for
11:07:31 example, something that's quite prevalent throughout
11:07:34 the rest of our city.
11:07:36 Height restrictions are very important.
11:07:39 So what we are dealing with is the compatibility of an
11:07:42 Air Force Base, that a plane, that we look at height
11:07:45 restrictions for the long-term.
11:07:46 So our staff will do a much better job than I can of
11:07:49 explaining all the details of what we are
11:07:51 recommending.
11:07:52 But the crux of it is, we want to limit densities in
11:07:55 the long-term in those two areas.
11:07:57 And we want to limit height.
11:07:59 We want to make sure we have some very clear height
11:08:02 restrictions in the long-term.
11:08:03 We want to protect not only the Air Force Base, but we

11:08:06 want to protect the people who live near the Air Force
11:08:08 Base.
11:08:09 And so it's really a protection on both sides.
11:08:12 And I'm sure as I said that through the public hearing
11:08:14 process there will be a tremendous amount of public
11:08:17 education that goes forward so that people understand
11:08:19 what their property rights are, and what their
11:08:23 property rights will be going forward.
11:08:25 I really want to thank -- I mentioned Colonel Woodward
11:08:29 and councilman Dingfelder and Commissioner Castor.
11:08:31 But we had a technical working group that consisted of
11:08:34 Rob Roan, Malcolm Alden, Al Steenson, Marty Perry,
11:08:39 David Cohen, Bob Dickman, Tom Keston, Melanie Higgins,
11:08:44 Cliff Fernandez, Margaret Hammer and Paula Harvey.
11:08:47 They put in a lot of hours and did a great job.
11:08:49 Of course, our staff, Catherine Coyle, couldn't have
11:08:53 done it without her, her expertise has been
11:08:56 tremendous.
11:08:56 Tony Rodriguez with MacDill Air Force Base.
11:08:59 And Tony Garcia, the Planning Commission.
11:09:01 Kathleen O'Dowd and Julia Cole from our attorney's
11:09:05 office.

11:09:05 We have also a consultant team of William Mather, John
11:09:09 LaRocca, Alan Murphy, Lorraine Lenz.
11:09:14 So really it's been a team process. The JLUS policy
11:09:19 committee, and all the other people that I mentioned
11:09:21 including a great deal of citizen input from the
11:09:23 citizens that I mentioned.
11:09:24 Everyone working together to preserve MacDill Air
11:09:27 Force Base, and preserve the integrity of the land
11:09:30 uses around MacDill Air Force Base, and ultimately
11:09:33 help protect the very people who live near the Air
11:09:36 Force Base.
11:09:38 It's my pleasure to now introduce to you Colonel
11:09:40 Margaret Woodward of MacDill Air Force Base.
11:09:49 >>> Colonel Maggie Woodward, commander of the sixth
11:09:53 air mobility wing.
11:09:55 It's an honor to be here today before you.
11:09:57 I am here today to express my very sincere
11:10:00 appreciation of once again for the City of Tampa and
11:10:03 the great partnership that we have been able to take
11:10:07 part in as far as this joint land use study committee,
11:10:12 and partnering with us to ensure that we are able to
11:10:15 control the growth that could impact our mission at

11:10:18 MacDill.
11:10:19 As I told you many times, I'm constantly amazed at the
11:10:23 support we get from this community.
11:10:24 I have said many times that I'm very envied by my
11:10:28 fellow wing commanders all around the globe with the
11:10:31 relationship we have here and this joint land use
11:10:34 study is another example of how well we partner
11:10:37 together, with the community, and I can never say
11:10:41 thank you, I think, enough to the community for what
11:10:43 it does to help us.
11:10:46 My job as the commander of a flying wing is to make
11:10:48 sure that I am able to provide our Commander-in-Chief
11:10:52 with the capabilities, capable warriors to take on the
11:11:00 mission that he has commanded to us do. I have to
11:11:02 ensure that we protect the public as well as we are
11:11:05 conducting our operations and doing them safely.
11:11:08 A critical part of that is balancing the flying
11:11:10 mission operations with what is safe for the City of
11:11:14 Tampa and the surrounding communities.
11:11:16 Public health and safety are responsibilities that
11:11:18 obviously we take very seriously.
11:11:20 Therefore, I'm privileged to serve as a member of a

11:11:24 liaison from MacDill on this committee, in
11:11:27 addressing our concerns with development that could
11:11:30 impact our ability to accomplish our mission.
11:11:33 It's my pleasure to serve on the JLUS committee and
11:11:36 thank pair Pam Iorio, councilman John Dingfelder and
11:11:42 county commissioner Cathy castor for an incredible
11:11:45 experience.
11:11:46 We appreciate your willingness to listen to our
11:11:48 concerns, and look at our mission.
11:11:53 I also want to thank the entire group especially Cathy
11:11:57 Coyle and John LaRocca for our tireless effort.
11:12:01 I couldn't have seen a better study go forward and
11:12:05 their leadership is a great part of that.
11:12:07 I want to say thank you to the City Council, the JLU
11:12:09 committee and the people who great share this
11:12:14 wonderful committee with us every day.
11:12:16 We look forward to continuing a wonderful partnership
11:12:18 that has been undergoing for so many years and that we
11:12:21 know will continue between our base and this great
11:12:25 community.
11:12:25 Thank you very much for the opportunity.
11:12:27 >> Thank you.

11:12:31 >> Thank you, council.
11:12:33 I did hand out the agenda that goes through the order
11:12:37 of speakers.
11:12:38 We do have a PowerPoint.
11:12:47 First and foremost, I will give an introduction to the
11:12:51 study schedule.
11:12:51 We will be giving you a brief of the study itself.
11:12:54 We have provided you the full document for your
11:12:56 review.
11:13:00 I will be asking for a motion at the end of the
11:13:02 discussion today.
11:13:03 Following myself will be Tony Rodriguez, he's the base
11:13:07 community planner.
11:13:08 He will be going through the history of the zone and
11:13:12 the AQ's recommendation done by the military, by the
11:13:15 Air Force.
11:13:17 Some recommendations will be done by John LaRocca
11:13:20 going through study parameters.
11:13:21 All of our findings, analyses of land use, densities,
11:13:25 and finally the review of the recommendations.
11:13:27 And I will wrap up with the implementation of the next
11:13:30 steps.

11:13:31 And there is a schedule that was provided to you as
11:13:33 well, an implementation schedule, which is fairly
11:13:36 aggressive; that completes -- will get us to where we
11:13:40 need to be.
11:14:05 To look at what we can do land use and zoningwise to
11:14:09 deal with development encroachment adjacent to the
11:14:11 base to protect not only their mission but the
11:14:15 citizens, as the mayor stated.
11:14:17 Study schedule, just a brief overview, we did start
11:14:18 this a year ago in July.
11:14:21 That's when we received the grant fund to conduct the
11:14:23 study.
11:14:23 We held the initial public information workshops
11:14:26 through December, January 2006.
11:14:29 We held four follow-up policy committee meetings on a
11:14:33 monthly basis.
11:14:34 Finally we are here today, July 20, to present the
11:14:36 study to you.
11:14:38 Completion date is slated for July 31st.
11:14:40 We plan on submitting the comprehensive plan amendment
11:14:43 changes on August 1st, with your motion.
11:14:47 Now to Tony.

11:14:54 >> Tony Rodriguez, base community planner for
11:14:57 MacDill Air Force Base.
11:14:58 The graphic that you see is an aerial of the South
11:15:02 Tampa peninsula with the clear zone and the accident
11:15:06 potential zones overlay.
11:15:07 And just a quick frame of reference.
11:15:10 The clear zone is the most immediate area right off
11:15:12 the end of the runway, and then potential zone 1 or
11:15:17 APZ 1 as it's referred to, is the next one out and
11:15:21 then APZ 2 further out.
11:15:23 We have a split APZ 2 in that our aircraft that are
11:15:28 taking off, when they take off, they get out over the
11:15:30 water as quickly as possible for safety and noise
11:15:33 abatement.
11:15:34 That's where Y there's that track over to the east.
11:15:37 The study area for the joint land use study was Gandy
11:15:41 Boulevard on the north, Manhattan Avenue on the west,
11:15:46 the northern boundary of MacDill Air Force Base to
11:15:48 the south, and the shoreline of the bay to the east.
11:16:00 Now, why do we have clear zones, accident potential
11:16:03 zones, these nebulous things?
11:16:05 This is a graphic of all of the major aircraft

11:16:09 accidents that have occurred since between 1984 and
11:16:15 1998.
11:16:16 And as you can see by the graphic, and it's laid out
11:16:19 in much the same way as the aerial is, the clear zone
11:16:22 being the area closest to the runway, you can see how
11:16:25 many mishaps are occurring in that clear zone area.
11:16:28 So that's got the highest pro tensity for aircraft
11:16:33 mishaps.
11:16:34 APZ 1, a little further -- a little less in terms of
11:16:38 accidents, and APZ 2 west as you go further up.
11:16:42 So we have clear zones and accident potential zones
11:16:46 based on this accident history that's Air Force-wide.
11:16:51 Now, if you have a flying mission, the Air Force does
11:16:56 something called an air installation compatible use
11:17:01 zone.
11:17:01 It's basically a land use compatibility and noise
11:17:05 study that is done in coordination with the community.
11:17:10 However, the AT's recommendations are generally Air
11:17:15 Force wide.
11:17:15 They give the same recommendations to every community.
11:17:19 And an example of that would be no residential in the
11:17:24 clear zone or accident potential zone 1.

11:17:27 And referring back to the aerial that we have, we have
11:17:31 a significant amount of residential in APZ 1.
11:17:36 As a matter of fact, it was probably residential down
11:17:37 there before there was a runway.
11:17:39 So what we needed to do was to find a way, a bridge,
11:17:45 from these very stringent APs recommendations that
11:17:49 are given to all communities, and where we are in
11:17:52 terms of the local zoning and comprehensive land use
11:17:55 plan, and the answer that we all came up with was to
11:18:01 complete this joint land use study, and to analyze
11:18:05 what the land uses, as well as the base operations
11:18:08 are, and to see what the best recommendation would be
11:18:14 for land use densities, and other type of
11:18:17 recommendations.
11:18:18 So with that, I would like to turn it over to John
11:18:20 LaRocca.
11:18:24 >>> I'm John LaRocca with LaRocca consulting group.
11:18:27 Takes mayor mentioned I was the project manager on the
11:18:29 consulting team, pulling together the final report as
11:18:35 a result of the technical advisory committee and
11:18:38 policy committee.
11:18:39 The study parameters that we were responsible for

11:18:45 included review of existing zoning land use
11:18:47 infrastructure, parks and recreational areas,
11:18:49 document, actual land uses from field survey, evaluate
11:18:53 development trends and pressures in the area, evaluate
11:18:56 MacDill Air Force Base's growth objectives and
11:18:58 operational needs, document public input, generate
11:19:03 recommendations regarding future development potential
11:19:06 in the peninsula.
11:19:09 Critical to our analysis was a study of future land
11:19:12 use -- current future land use classifications and
11:19:15 zoning classifications in the study area.
11:19:18 All of this information, of course, is provided in the
11:19:20 report that's been distributed to you this morning.
11:19:23 And you can look at it in more detail.
11:19:25 But the graphics that are being displayed at the
11:19:29 moment indicate that the majority of the future land
11:19:33 use classifications within the area affected by the
11:19:37 clear APZ 1 and APZ 2 zones fall within an area
11:19:42 currently designated and limited by the current comp
11:19:45 plan of 10 dwelling units to the acre.
11:19:48 You recall based on Tony's comments that he just made,
11:19:51 the A-2 recommendation is made on the enclosure APZ 1

11:19:55 and APZ 2 zones at the ends of run ways are
11:19:59 substantially more restrictive than that.
11:20:01 But this map illustrates existing patterns of the
11:20:06 future land use designations that have been defined in
11:20:09 your current future land use plan.
11:20:12 The zoning classification map in the next graphic
11:20:15 illustrates that the bulk of property, the majority of
11:20:19 property within the APZ 1 and APZ 2 zones are the
11:20:24 RS-50 and RS-60 zoning classifications, and the
11:20:30 majority of the land in that area is platted for lots
11:20:34 that are comparable to their zoning character.
11:20:38 There has been, as you well know up in the APZ 2 area,
11:20:42 in the core of the Ballast Point area, projects
11:20:45 through the PD zoning process, that historically have
11:20:48 exceeded those densities, and where the greatest
11:20:52 pressure for intensification for development has
11:20:55 occurred.
11:20:56 We did a quick analysis based on work through the
11:20:59 technical advisory committee and other data available
11:21:02 to us in the APZ 1 area.
11:21:05 And these are gross densities.
11:21:07 Single-family development that exists within the APZ-1

11:21:12 area. This is the area just outside of the clear
11:21:14 zone, the most restricted area at the end of the
11:21:16 runway, but is of an area most concern of the
11:21:20 densities established in a that area are 5.61 units to
11:21:25 the acre, duplex development in the area built out at
11:21:26 9.87 dwelling units to the acre, multifamily at 27.17
11:21:32 units per acre, park and recreational lands make up
11:21:36 about 128.5 acres.
11:21:39 Vacant land at about 37 acres.
11:21:42 In the APZ 2 area, the analysis of land use suggests
11:21:47 that single-family is developed at 4.27 units per
11:21:50 acre, duplex at 4.61 units per acre, multifamily at
11:21:56 15.5 units per acre, there are 10.1 acres of park and
11:22:01 recreational lands, and 12.1 acres of vacant land.
11:22:09 Our study recommendations, of which the policy
11:22:12 committee accepted, had short-term and long-term
11:22:15 goals.
11:22:16 Our short-term goals included the creation of an MI AP
11:22:21 land use designation.
11:22:24 Military installation airport.
11:22:26 It's a clear definition of the defined area in the
11:22:31 clear APZ 1, APZ 2 designated areas, and some obvious

11:22:37 areas adjacent to those areas to be designated on the
11:22:40 long-range comprehensive plan, MAIP, creating new
11:22:45 zoning classifications to follow the land use
11:22:48 designations five districts.
11:22:49 MAIP 1 through MAIP 5.
11:22:53 There has been some precedent set with MAP zoning near
11:22:57 Tampa International Airport. The terminology, we
11:22:57 think, has been utilized before and well reflected.
11:23:01 It reflects and will regulate land use in a way that
11:23:05 recognizes proximity to our military installation
11:23:09 airport.
11:23:13 Establish a real estate closure requirement.
11:23:16 Codify, find and formalize the process for development
11:23:19 permits to require FAA, MacDill Air Force base
11:23:22 approval authorizing particular heights for
11:23:24 development proposals.
11:23:26 Our study recommendations and long-term goals include
11:23:31 investigating the feasibility of establishing a
11:23:34 navigation easement for all new development, develop a
11:23:37 land acquisition program where appropriate and create
11:23:39 a street signage program identifying the accident
11:23:41 potential zones and clear zones within the area.

11:23:45 With that, I will stop, ask Cathy to come up, and
11:23:49 leave time for questions.
11:23:53 >>CATHERINE COYLE: Just a follow-up of a few points.
11:23:58 As much credit as I have given to being the project
11:24:00 manager, I want to acknowledge the people in the land
11:24:03 development office and in the other agencies within
11:24:05 the city that provided a lot of information, a lot of
11:24:08 support.
11:24:08 To my fellow consultant team in this project.
11:24:12 Finally, I would like to introduce rich TANGA from
11:24:19 Washington, office of defense, and without him I would
11:24:23 not have been able to get the paperwork done.
11:24:31 >>> Good morning, council members.
11:24:32 On behalf of the department much defense I came down
11:24:34 today to first thank you and thank everyone that was
11:24:36 involved in this project, from the joint land use
11:24:39 study policy committee, to the working group.
11:24:41 This is what I consider one of the outstanding
11:24:45 projects I have worked with.
11:24:46 This is my third project in Florida.
11:24:49 I'm starting up a new one down at EG land Air Force
11:24:54 Base.

11:24:55 I want to thank everybody that contributed to this
11:24:56 project.
11:24:57 In particular I want to recognize Tony Rodriguez who
11:25:00 just left, and Cathy Coyle for their outstanding work
11:25:04 and perseverance.
11:25:07 Tony has been involved with this since he nominated
11:25:08 the project several years ago.
11:25:10 People came and left, and we had to keep pushing
11:25:14 forward.
11:25:14 And Cathy came in.
11:25:15 She took the bull by the horns and made this project
11:25:18 go.
11:25:18 So between the mayor and everybody involved, thank you
11:25:20 very much.
11:25:24 The recommendations that are coming out of this study
11:25:26 are going to be win-win for the base and for the
11:25:29 community.
11:25:30 And I can item you right now this is going to be a
11:25:32 model study that I am going to use, a case study, to
11:25:36 share with other communities that we are going to do
11:25:38 these projects with throughout the country.
11:25:40 Again, thank you very much.

11:25:46 >>CATHERINE COYLE: Thank you, council.
11:25:47 Finally, based on the recommendations that were given,
11:25:50 just a note, item number 28 on the agenda is
11:25:54 recognition of a grant that we received from
11:25:56 enterprise Florida to purchase a piece of property in
11:25:58 the clear zone.
11:25:59 So we are actively seeking those types of purchases of
11:26:06 property, and efforts to limit the encroachment next
11:26:10 to the base.
11:26:11 Finally, referring to 5.0 in the book which are the
11:26:16 study recommendations, in that tab you will see the
11:26:18 land use recommendations.
11:26:20 These are actual policy changes that will be submitted
11:26:23 to the Planning Commission to change the policy,
11:26:26 future land use element as it relates to MacDill
11:26:28 Air Force Base, creating a new land use category,
11:26:32 which is titled military installation airport.
11:26:35 It is similar to the municipal airport, land use
11:26:39 designation that surrounds TIA with the exception of
11:26:41 its focus on a military installation, and with a
11:26:45 motion from you, we would like to transmit those
11:26:47 policy changes to the Planning Commission for the

11:26:49 August 1 deadline.
11:26:51 And the motion will be to accept the study as
11:26:53 presented, and request the administration to transmit
11:26:56 the proposed comprehensive plan, map and text
11:26:59 amendments to the Planning Commission by the August
11:27:00 1st deadline.
11:27:01 We obviously are here for any questions or any
11:27:05 additional information that you may need.
11:27:07 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Congratulations to everyone.
11:27:09 This is great work.
11:27:10 I have one small question.
11:27:12 On the street signage program, could somebody
11:27:16 elaborate on that?
11:27:17 >>CATHERINE COYLE: That has been a recommendation that
11:27:19 we have done on other studies as well, a long-term
11:27:22 recommendation.
11:27:22 It's similar, I would say, to when you enter beach
11:27:26 front communities where they have hurricane evacuation
11:27:28 signage, throughout the area.
11:27:31 There was some debate over what the actual logo would
11:27:34 be for an accident potential zone.
11:27:36 It is a long-term goal.

11:27:38 It's not one that we would enact on immediately.
11:27:45 >> Some more conversation about that, think the idea
11:27:49 of saying duck -- there's probably nothing that you
11:27:54 can do about it.
11:27:55 I don't know that we want to necessarily put up signs.
11:27:59 I just hope future conversation.
11:28:02 >>> Definitely noted.
11:28:07 >>MARY ALVAREZ: I would like to congratulate everybody
11:28:09 that was involved in this, too.
11:28:11 And, John, thank you for being part of it.
11:28:15 One question I did have was in the APG 1 and 2 --
11:28:20 APZ-1 and 2, the different single-family homes there
11:28:24 now, the duplex and multifamily, aren't those mostly
11:28:28 personnel, MacDill Air Force personnel
11:28:34 >>CATHERINE COYLE: No, this is off base, north of the
11:28:36 northern boundary of the base on private property.
11:28:38 I can't see if there are military people that own
11:28:40 homes in there.
11:28:41 A lot of them are retired military, I would say.
11:28:43 But whoever happens to own that property.
11:28:46 There is a map in tab 5 which shows the land use
11:28:49 change.

11:28:50 It's exhibit 5.1.
11:28:53 5-1.
11:28:54 I can put it on the Elmo.
11:28:59 The APZ.
11:29:14 The wavy line happens to be the noise contour for the
11:29:18 plan.
11:29:19 Which changes over time as different aircraft come in.
11:29:24 >>MARY ALVAREZ: I was under the impression -- thank
11:29:31 you.
11:29:33 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Cathy, could you go back to the
11:29:35 previous screen?
11:29:38 >>> The previous screen?
11:29:39 Oh, on the PowerPoint.
11:29:42 >>SHAWN HARRISON: There we go.
11:29:43 I'm glad to see that we are looking into a land
11:29:47 acquisition program.
11:29:48 I think that's important if we are going to be
11:29:50 impacting potential future property rights.
11:29:53 And that should come frankly from the federal
11:29:56 government as well as from us.
11:29:59 I think we should be aggressive in looking for funding
11:30:02 from national government for that.

11:30:06 I think that, Mary, I appreciate your words earlier,
11:30:12 that existing property rights will not be impacted.
11:30:15 That's important.
11:30:15 I think we all agree with that.
11:30:17 And as we all understand the protection of MacDill
11:30:21 Air Force Base is probably the most paramount thing
11:30:24 that we can do here within the city.
11:30:28 So I think this is -- we are proceeding along the
11:30:31 right lines and look forward to the public hearings.
11:30:34 We need to hear from the folks that will be really
11:30:36 impacted on it.
11:30:39 >>CATHERINE COYLE: I did provide with you the
11:30:40 implementation schedule.
11:30:41 And it shows you the schedule of all these potential
11:30:48 tentative dates from the public hearing.
11:30:49 I even included the agenda routing as application.
11:30:54 And it's slated for completion of the area-wide
11:30:56 rezoning January 25th, 2007.
11:31:02 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: It's been almost about a year, I
11:31:07 guess, that we have been working on this, or more than
11:31:09 a year.
11:31:10 And it has been a great partnership.

11:31:11 I want to express my thanks to the mayor for all their
11:31:15 hard work and for putting me on the committee.
11:31:18 It's been great to work with you and with the colonel
11:31:21 and with Commissioner Castor, as the committee
11:31:24 members.
11:31:26 Great staff including Mr. Tanga, Cathy Coyle, John
11:31:32 Larocca and all the other staff members that worked on
11:31:32 it. I want to emphasize what the mayor said.
11:31:35 There are some dedicated citizens.
11:31:36 They attended every single meeting we had.
11:31:38 They had their own meetings on their own that we
11:31:40 didn't attend.
11:31:41 They put in more hours than we did. And, Mayor, you
11:31:47 recognized them.
11:31:48 As the mayor indicated this is not only about
11:31:50 protecting MacDill and all the economic and great
11:31:53 things that MacDill does for our community, but
11:31:56 also about protecting our residents.
11:31:59 I think as we deliberated during the last year, we
11:32:01 addressed both of those issues very, very seriously,
11:32:04 and with great care.
11:32:09 And we have we reached some compromises, kind of as we

11:32:15 do on council.
11:32:15 And I think it's a good plan.
11:32:17 So with that, I'll go ahead and if it's time I'll make
11:32:22 a motion that we transmit the initial package of
11:32:24 comprehensive plan changes to the Planning Commission
11:32:27 for their review.
11:32:29 >> Second.
11:32:29 >>GWEN MILLER: I have a motion and second.
11:32:31 (Motion carried).
11:32:31 >>ROSE FERLITA: I just wanted to make pretty much the
11:32:36 same compliments.
11:32:38 Mayor, this is a great plan and great joint effort.
11:32:41 And I think it certainly keeps the community to show
11:32:45 our military that we do everything we can to protect
11:32:48 that area.
11:32:48 We don't want them to ever be on any kind of list that
11:32:51 we don't want them to be on, they don't wanted to be
11:32:53 on, and briefly thanks to the committee that worked on
11:32:56 it, John, you as well.
11:32:58 But a comment that colonel Woodward made as she's
11:33:01 leaving that she was surprised that she's getting the
11:33:03 cooperation from this community that she does.

11:33:06 I think leadership attracts leadership.
11:33:08 And Maggie is a friend of mine and the quiet
11:33:14 leadership that she has certainly demand it is respect
11:33:17 of the troops she leads and the relationship she has
11:33:20 created with the mayor.
11:33:21 It's an incredible win-win all the way around.
11:33:24 Thanks to everybody.
11:33:25 This is a security issue that has to be right at the
11:33:27 top of our list.
11:33:28 And I think this committee has addressed it, addressed
11:33:31 it well, addressed it effectively, and I think clear
11:33:33 message, we are her to support MacDill, and
11:33:36 MacDill understands it, and the City of Tampa and
11:33:38 the administration that leads this city, they have a
11:33:41 partnership and they are very welcome.
11:33:45 Mayor, thank you.
11:33:47 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Thank you, mayor.
11:33:48 >>GWEN MILLER: Anything else?
11:33:49 We move on then.
11:33:51 Item number 52 is a continued public hearing.
11:33:57 >>HEATHER LAMBOY: Land development.
11:34:05 I have been sworn.

11:34:07 First of all, I have been trying -- I still have
11:34:12 several objections.
11:34:13 And I haven't been able to find the petitioner.
11:34:15 >>GWEN MILLER: Is the petitioner here for item number
11:34:17 52?
11:34:20 Item 52.
11:34:21 Is petitioner here?
11:34:23 >>ROSE FERLITA: Move to continue.
11:34:26 >>> Staff would like to request a continuance.
11:34:32 It was heard June 8th.
11:34:34 There were technical issues the petitioner needed to
11:34:36 deal with.
11:34:36 I got a revised site plan that dealt with the
11:34:40 landscape objections but nothing else.
11:34:42 And --
11:34:49 >>ROSE FERLITA: Are you petitioner?
11:34:52 Are you the petitioner?
11:35:00 Do you need to still talk with him?
11:35:03 >>HEATHER LAMBOY: If we can go to the next case and I
11:35:05 can talk with him.
11:35:07 >>GWEN MILLER: We need to open number 53.
11:35:11 >>: Move to open.

11:35:12 >> Second.
11:35:12 (Motion carried)
11:35:19 >>> I'm here to present WZ 06-60, for 1241 east Fowler
11:35:26 Avenue.
11:35:26 The petitioner is requesting for a 4(COP-X), sale of
11:35:31 alcohol on the premises only.
11:35:34 The location was previously wet zoned by the petition
11:35:40 WZ 06-127, and (COP-X).
11:35:52 He would like to add the porch and wet zone the porch.
11:36:01 The wet zone establishment in the 1,000 feet, you can
11:36:04 see there are two wet zoned properties.
11:36:07 One is COP, the other COP-R.
11:36:21 Provision for the City Council to waive the distance
11:36:24 requirements.
11:36:25 Residential establishment.
11:36:31 We have no objection.
11:36:33 The application was for the Tampa Police Department
11:36:33 for their review.
11:36:39 >>> Officer Miller, Tampa Police Department.
11:36:45 I have been sworn.
11:36:45 We have no objections to this wet zoning.
11:36:47 >>GWEN MILLER: Petitioner?

11:36:49 >>STEVE MICHELINI: Here on behalf of Alexander
11:36:56 redevelopment company.
11:36:57 As the staff has indicated there was an error on the
11:37:00 survey which omitted the porch and ware asking that
11:37:02 the porch be included in the wet zoning.
11:37:08 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
11:37:09 wants to speak on item 53?
11:37:11 >> Move to close.
11:37:12 >> Second.
11:37:12 (Motion carried).
11:37:13 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Move an ordinance repealing
11:37:27 ordinance 2005-339 making lawful the sale of beverages
11:37:31 regardless of alcoholic content beer, wine and liquor
11:37:34 4(COP-X) for consumption on premises only at or from
11:37:37 that certain lot, plot or tract of land located at
11:37:40 1241 east Fowler Avenue, Tampa, Florida, as more
11:37:43 particularly described in section 3 hereof waiving
11:37:46 certain restrictions as to distance based upon certain
11:37:48 findings, providing for repeal of all ordinances in
11:37:51 conflict, providing an effective date.
11:37:52 >>GWEN MILLER: I have a motion and second.
11:37:54 (Motion carried).

11:37:59 >> Move to open 54.
11:38:01 >> Second.
11:38:01 (Motion carried)
11:38:09 >> The next case is wet zoning for the location at
11:38:15 1705 -- 17503-D preserve walk lane.
11:38:22 Sale of alcohol.
11:38:26 There are three wet zoned properties that we can see.
11:38:31 There are no additional institutional properties
11:38:35 within 1,000 feet.
11:38:38 You can also waive the distance requirements by the
11:38:41 provision of the code.
11:38:54 >>> City of Tampa police department.
11:38:56 I have been sworn.
11:38:57 We have in a objections to this wet zone.
11:38:59 >>GWEN MILLER: Petitioner?
11:39:00 Petitioner?
11:39:07 >>> My name is WAI SHIK Chan.
11:39:13 I am applying for the wine and beer license.
11:39:25 >>SHAWN HARRISON: I have a question.
11:39:27 Which place is this now?
11:39:29 What's in there right now?
11:39:31 >>> It is a Japanese restaurant, a sushi bar and

11:39:35 kitchen.
11:39:38 >>SHAWN HARRISON: An existing Japanese restaurant?
11:39:40 >>> Yes.
11:39:41 >>SHAWN HARRISON: I missed that one.
11:39:44 That's not where the old Krispy Kreme is, is it?
11:39:49 >>> We are across the street from the Krispy Kreme.
11:39:52 >> Oh, all right.
11:39:55 >>> Is there anyone in the public that wants to speak
11:39:57 on item 54?
11:40:00 >> Move to close.
11:40:01 >> Second.
11:40:01 (Motion carried).
11:40:02 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you.
11:40:08 I would like to move an ordinance re-- for the sale of
11:40:13 alcoholic beverages containing alcohol not more than
11:40:16 14% by weight wines regardless of alcoholic content
11:40:19 beer and wine 2(COP-R) for couples on premises only in
11:40:23 conjunction with a restaurant business establishment
11:40:25 at or from that certain lot, plot or tract of land,
11:40:27 located at 17503-D, preserve walk lane, waiving
11:40:36 certain restrictions as to distance based on certain
11:40:38 findings providing for repeal of all ordinances in

11:40:41 conflict, providing an effective date.
11:40:42 >>GWEN MILLER: I have a motion and second.
11:40:43 (Motion carried).
11:40:46 >> Move to open number 55.
11:40:48 >> Second.
11:40:48 (Motion carried).
11:40:49 >>GWEN MILLER: It passed.
11:40:59 >>> The next case is WZ-06-79, 2807 Busch Boulevard.
11:41:12 The petitioner is requesting a one-year extension on
11:41:14 the wet zoning.
11:41:17 In 1996-96 was granted 4(COP-R) on-site and 120 day
11:41:25 extension expired on the 29th of March 2006.
11:41:31 The petitioner is requesting the extension in order to
11:41:34 continue the wet zoning during the exchange of the
11:41:36 ownership.
11:41:43 City Council can grant one year extension.
11:41:46 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: This is a question for legal.
11:41:49 When someone requests an extension, is the
11:41:53 neighborhood organization notified of that request for
11:41:56 extension?
11:42:00 >>> Yes, the code does require notification to the
11:42:03 surrounding property owners.

11:42:05 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: That's great because this is an
11:42:07 opportunity if somebody has been a problem for the
11:42:09 neighborhood for them to speak up.
11:42:10 I'm glad to hear that they are notified.
11:42:12 Thank you.
11:42:13 >>GWEN MILLER: Do you want to comment?
11:42:15 >>> Yes, sir.
11:42:16 City of Tampa police department.
11:42:17 I have been sworn.
11:42:18 Once again we have no objection to this project.
11:42:21 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
11:42:24 wants to speak?
11:42:25 Petitioner?
11:42:37 >>> Joseph Paleo, north 27th street.
11:42:41 I have been sworn.
11:42:41 This is my wife Jean Busch Paleo.
11:42:47 Can we speak at the same time?
11:42:49 >>GWEN MILLER: Sure.
11:42:49 Give your name.
11:42:51 >>> I don't know if you want to hear from petitioner
11:42:53 first and then go ahead.
11:42:56 >> We don't want to miss the opportunity.

11:43:03 >>CHAIRMAN: Let's see what he has to say first.
11:43:09 >>> Good morning, council members.
11:43:10 My name is Chris swank for the record, Carlton Fields,
11:43:14 address 4221 west Boy Scout Boulevard.
11:43:17 I have been sworn.
11:43:18 Here representing the petitioner, Tampa real estate
11:43:21 holdings, LLC, requesting a petition to extend for
11:43:32 beverages at the corner of 2807 Busch Boulevard for a
11:43:34 period of one year to allow for the sale of the
11:43:37 property.
11:43:39 We are hear to answer any questions or any concerns
11:43:41 with the -- that the neighbors may have.
11:43:44 If you folks have any questions I'm here with
11:43:46 representatives of the petitioner as well.
11:43:49 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Do you have a pending contract on
11:43:51 this?
11:43:53 >>> We do, ma'am.
11:43:54 That's correct.
11:43:56 >> You do. Okay.
11:43:57 >>GWEN MILLER: You may come back up.
11:44:00 Mr. Poleo.
11:44:03 >>> Thank you, councilwoman.

11:44:07 As I stated originally, me and my wife have no
11:44:13 objections to the zoning being continued on this
11:44:15 property as a 4(COP-R), and the property being
11:44:18 operated as it was intended, as a residence.
11:44:22 We ran into a problem, and the previous owners went
11:44:28 outside the guidelines of the 4(COP-R) and operated as
11:44:31 a regular 4(COP) as a lounge and nature club playing
11:44:34 music till 3:00 in the morning.
11:44:36 I believe this gentleman addressed one of my concerns
11:44:38 where he asked for the zoning to be on a conditional
11:44:41 one-year basis.
11:44:42 And we are hopeful within the one-year period of time
11:44:45 that they stay within the constraints.
11:44:46 The neighbor next to them happens to be a national
11:44:49 Italian restaurant.
11:44:50 We have no problem with them, because they normally
11:44:53 operate, and they do -- normally operate within normal
11:44:57 business hours.
11:44:58 And they don't have this loud music like we had once
11:45:01 before.
11:45:01 So we just wanted to address our concerns, if it was
11:45:04 going to be operated as a lounge, which we understand

11:45:07 at this point it is not.
11:45:08 We want to make sure that some safeguards are in place
11:45:11 to make sure it doesn't get that way.
11:45:18 >>> When it was converted to a lounge, they never made
11:45:20 any changes to the acoustics.
11:45:25 It changed the entrance to the side, which the sound
11:45:31 came right into our back doors, our sliding back
11:45:34 doors, vibrated he have night until 3:00 in the
11:45:37 morning.
11:45:40 But if there's going to be a band, that some
11:45:42 acoustics, acoustical changes could be made so that it
11:45:47 would not be the noise, it would not disturb the whole
11:45:51 neighborhood.
11:45:53 We welcome it being reopened.
11:45:55 It would be better to have a good neighbor and have it
11:45:58 occupied.
11:45:59 But we would like for it to be -- for the changes to
11:46:04 be made, if there is music, for it to be -- not so
11:46:14 loud that we can't sleep.
11:46:17 But we would welcome a good neighbor.
11:46:20 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank you.
11:46:22 Ms. Saul-Sena.

11:46:23 Mr. Harrison?
11:46:25 >>SHAWN HARRISON: I don't know that you are offering
11:46:27 to them what you think they are offering to them.
11:46:31 >>> I think I can ALLAY their concerns.
11:46:35 Not prayer owner but prior tenant.
11:46:37 They were leasing the property to a group that
11:46:41 operated as a phase 2, a club, and we had a lot of
11:46:45 problems with them.
11:46:46 We had to evict that tenant.
11:46:50 And that's enough of the story there.
11:46:51 So we are aware of those issues and we got rid of the
11:46:54 tenant.
11:46:54 Going forward, I believe the property is going to be
11:47:00 operated as a hotel restaurant.
11:47:02 So it will be a compatible use.
11:47:04 And I don't think music is contemplated.
11:47:11 >>SHAWN HARRISON: A hotel restaurant?
11:47:12 >>> A hotel and attendant restaurant use.
11:47:21 >>MARY ALVAREZ: What hotel is that?
11:47:23 >> I just know that's the prospective use.
11:47:28 >> On that particular property?
11:47:30 >>> It's proposed.

11:47:32 >> Bed and breakfast.
11:47:35 >>SHAWN HARRISON: If it's truly going to be a
11:47:36 restaurant, we can impose some hour restrictions on
11:47:40 it.
11:47:41 And I don't think that's before us right now.
11:47:43 We would have to send this back to legal to create a
11:47:46 new ordinance.
11:47:47 The safest route for to us go is do a one-year
11:47:51 conditional on this.
11:47:51 That gives you a chance to sell it.
11:47:53 It has a wet zoning.
11:47:55 But the new owner will have to come in in a year and
11:47:58 say this is what I'm doing here, and this is -- the
11:48:02 neighbors will have a chance to come back in and say,
11:48:04 okay, yes, these guys are good neighbors, and we are
11:48:07 willing to go for a full, you know, 4(COP-R) rather
11:48:10 than one-year conditional.
11:48:14 >>REBECCA KERT: Legal department. The application
11:48:15 that's before you is actually not a new application
11:48:18 for wet zoning.
11:48:19 It's an application to be able to continue despite the
11:48:21 fact they are not at the present time having sales of

11:48:25 alcoholic beverages.
11:48:25 So they are asking for a year to be able to retain the
11:48:30 sales of alcoholic beverages.
11:48:32 There isn't an opportunity, because this is not a knew
11:48:34 ordinance.
11:48:35 It's actually just a resolution to for a continuance
11:48:42 or make it conditional.
11:48:43 If the applicant shows good cause why they should be
11:48:46 able to continue operating under the ordinance that's
11:48:50 already been adopted.
11:48:53 >>SHAWN HARRISON: So they can't even ask for a
11:48:55 conditional on this?
11:48:57 >>> That's not before you.
11:48:58 It's not a new ordinance.
11:48:59 It's simply a resolution that would allow them to
11:49:02 waive one of the provisions of your code which
11:49:04 requires that they don't sell alcoholic beverages for
11:49:09 more than 30 days.
11:49:10 It's just not in position before you.
11:49:13 >> So we vote it up or down.
11:49:15 Those are our only two options?
11:49:17 >>> That's correct.

11:49:17 >>ROSE FERLITA: I would like to get some direction
11:49:23 from legal.
11:49:24 And this has been a problem, certainly not this
11:49:26 gentleman's fault, but that the Paleo's continued to
11:49:34 complain on this.
11:49:36 Many times we give an extension so it won't dry out.
11:49:38 But if somebody comes in ---is it a 4(COP)?
11:49:43 >> It's currently a 4(COP-R) and so they would be
11:49:46 required to give reporting requirements to demonstrate
11:49:48 they are operating as a restaurant with a 51% food and
11:49:52 nonalcoholic beverage sales.
11:49:53 And as far as the issue of noise, there are the noise
11:49:57 regulations that are in place.
11:49:58 And if in fact there are violations of that, your code
11:50:01 does allow you -- right now it does allow you to
11:50:06 revoke a wet zoning if there are --
11:50:09 >>ROSE FERLITA: that the past tenant was able to do
11:50:13 what they did if it was an R.
11:50:15 I didn't realize that.
11:50:16 >>> That might have been an enforcement issue.
11:50:20 >>ROSE FERLITA: Not enough of an enforcement issue.
11:50:23 Then, Mr. Harrison, these are the options we have, to

11:50:25 give them the opportunity to extend this so that it
11:50:27 won't dry up and they don't have to go through the
11:50:29 whole process.
11:50:30 But when somebody else comes in, at that point,
11:50:33 because it is just a continuance of an existing
11:50:37 4(COP-R), would we be able to impose any particular
11:50:40 restrictions or ask the tenant to self-impose any
11:50:44 restrictions so that we feel good about protecting
11:50:46 them so they don't run into the same mess they were in
11:50:49 last time?
11:50:50 >>> If City Council continues to have additional time,
11:50:55 not selling alcoholic beverages, then it won't come
11:50:58 back before you.
11:51:00 >> Okay.
11:51:01 Then I want to tell you, I think we need to hear the
11:51:05 rest -- that concerns me, because I think given the
11:51:07 history, and not that it's this gentleman's fault or
11:51:10 the new tenant coming forward, if bee go that route we
11:51:14 won't be able to exercise any kind of mechanism to
11:51:16 give them some protection or ask the new tenant or the
11:51:19 new group that's coming in to self-impose some
11:51:22 conditions.

11:51:23 They would just go on, Julia, right?
11:51:26 They just reactivate.
11:51:29 From the standpoint of information it is a 4(COP-R).
11:51:32 But is it a 4(COP) -- is it wet zoned based on the
11:51:37 footprint of the building, or the footprint of the
11:51:39 property?
11:51:41 And if it's on the property, then, sir, depending on
11:51:46 who the tenant is and the desire to rent it, they will
11:51:50 be able to reconfigure the building.
11:51:55 Could be bigger.
11:51:56 Could be the same.
11:51:56 If it's the footprint of the property, that is
11:51:58 important to me.
11:52:02 >>> I am going to ask staff to review that issue and I
11:52:04 just call to the attention of the City Council that
11:52:06 you do have regulation that a property does run dry,
11:52:10 but I believe there's a six-month waiting period
11:52:12 before they can come back.
11:52:19 >>> The wet zoning by the previous owner.
11:52:28 >>CATHERINE COYLE: Land development.
11:52:43 The exterior perimeter of the proposed building, it's
11:52:46 only the building footprint, et.

11:52:49 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I have a couple questions of the
11:52:51 petitioner.
11:52:52 First of all, what kind of protection is there in
11:52:56 terms of masonry wall or something between yourself
11:52:59 and the neighbors to the south?
11:53:03 >> The representative of the petitioner might be
11:53:04 better to address that.
11:53:08 He's more familiar with the property than I am.
11:53:12 >> Fred Bullard, 1019 fifteenth Avenue north,
11:53:17 St. Petersburg.
11:53:17 The surrounding property, there's a hotel --
11:53:20 >> No, that wasn't my question.
11:53:22 Immediately to the south of the property, what kind of
11:53:26 masonry wall?
11:53:28 >>> To the south?
11:53:29 The rear of the property?
11:53:32 I don't know if there's a solid wall there.
11:53:35 There may just be foliage.
11:53:37 I'm not positive.
11:53:39 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Another question.
11:53:40 How long did you have the previous tenant and did you
11:53:43 know that they are going to be doing a lounge?

11:53:45 >>> No, they proposed a restaurant operation serving
11:53:48 liquor.
11:53:53 But we didn't find out until after they --
11:53:57 >> Don't you communicate with them that their zoning
11:54:00 was restricted?
11:54:02 >> I think they knew that when they took it on.
11:54:04 >> How long were they your tenant?
11:54:05 >> They were there for about, I think, a year.
11:54:08 >> Well, for a year, they had this lounge that --
11:54:12 >>KEVIN WHITE: Just for clarification, it was a
11:54:14 restaurant as well.
11:54:17 >>> Yeah, they were selling food but I don't think
11:54:19 they were meeting the food requirements which is
11:54:21 somebody was saying earlier.
11:54:23 >> As a property owner were you aware of the noise
11:54:25 complaints?
11:54:26 >>> No.
11:54:26 No.
11:54:27 >> You didn't receive notification?
11:54:30 >>> No.
11:54:30 Not that I'm aware of.
11:54:34 >> How in tune are you with this this?

11:54:40 >>> I'm not sure if I understand the question.
11:54:43 >> How often did you communicate with your tenants?
11:54:45 >>> Well the deal originally was they had an option to
11:54:47 purchase the property.
11:54:48 So as tenants, we were considering them basically on
11:54:54 contract to purchase.
11:54:54 They defaulted on that contract.
11:54:57 >> It sounds like you fired them.
11:54:58 >>> Well, they didn't consummate the purchase so we
11:55:00 terminated their tenancy, from the financial
11:55:07 standpoint and we heard that -- actually through the
11:55:12 newspaper I found out that they were having problems
11:55:16 they were having problems with neighbors or whatever.
11:55:18 >>ROSE FERLITA: I just have a question.
11:55:19 I don't mean to barge in on Ms. Saul-Sena's questions.
11:55:23 But that really concerns me.
11:55:24 We have gotten lots of complaints.
11:55:28 Ms. Paleo were concerned because of the disruption of
11:55:33 their tranquillity.
11:55:34 Do you represent a corporation?
11:55:36 >>> No, we are just owners of the property.
11:55:39 >> And you tell me you never got notices from this

11:55:41 city with regards to concerns and noise, or code
11:55:44 violations?
11:55:45 >>> I'm not aware of any notification was given.
11:55:47 >> Well, when you are saying you are not aware, was
11:55:50 there anybody that is involved with this with you that
11:55:52 may have gotten those notices?
11:55:54 >>> It's possible, but you guys probably have record,
11:55:57 I would assume.
11:55:57 >> Well, no, no, but I'm concerned about you having a
11:56:00 record.
11:56:00 You're the property owner.
11:56:01 >>> Right.
11:56:02 >> So you're saying that you didn't.
11:56:03 But are there some other people that are involved from
11:56:05 the standpoint of ownership that could have?
11:56:07 Are there some other people --
11:56:09 >>> Possible.
11:56:09 >> Are there other people involved in the ownership
11:56:12 with you?
11:56:12 Yes or no?
11:56:13 >>> Yeah.
11:56:14 I mean, no.

11:56:15 I'm not --
11:56:16 >> If you're the owner, then there's a code, notice of
11:56:20 violation, it's my understanding the owner gets that
11:56:22 notice of violation.
11:56:23 >>> Uh-huh.
11:56:24 >> Are you representing somebody else?
11:56:26 Or do you own it.
11:56:27 >>> My father is the owner of the building.
11:56:29 Tess shareholder of the company.
11:56:31 He's the primary shareholder of the company.
11:56:33 >> Okay.
11:56:34 So there is a company.
11:56:35 And somebody acts in a capacity of leadership and or
11:56:37 your father should have gotten a notice.
11:56:39 >>> I did not receive any -- I'm not aware of him
11:56:42 receiving any.
11:56:43 >> Okay, then listen, I am not going to debate it
11:56:45 anymore.
11:56:46 You say somebody may have could have, should have,
11:56:49 did, didn't, I don't know. But we have been in
11:56:51 contact with these people for a long time there. Were
11:56:53 ongoing problems.

11:56:54 I think where Mrs. Saul-Sena is going, if somebody --
11:56:57 and Linda, correct me if I am wrong.
11:56:58 I don't want to put your words in your mouth.
11:57:01 But if you are an owner and you have continuous
11:57:04 violations for who has not been keeping to the
11:57:07 guidelines of the 4(COP-R) because of the percentage
11:57:10 and they have been a nuisance to the neighborhood and
11:57:12 you haven't gotten a notice and you are not aware that
11:57:14 anybody else in your ownership umbrella got it, that
11:57:18 to me tells me that I want some control of what we are
11:57:20 going to help you put in there later.
11:57:22 We are talking about conceptually somebody who will
11:57:25 come in and do a 4(COP-R), and I haven't heard from
11:57:30 this council member's standpoint anyway enough
11:57:33 evidence that tells me I'm comfortable with what you
11:57:35 all are going to choose to put in there.
11:57:37 So I'm not going to support an extension.
11:57:39 I just want to you know that.
11:57:40 I'm sorry, Linda.
11:57:46 >>> Council members, if I could, please.
11:57:47 If there's a concern about this, I think we would be
11:57:50 more than willing to put forward, you know, the --

11:57:56 continuance of the use for a year to allow the can
11:57:59 consummation of the sale and if we could come back,
11:58:01 once we have established, have petitioner come back
11:58:03 after a year, the new owner come back after a year and
11:58:06 talk about it, I think --
11:58:08 >>ROSE FERLITA: I happen to agree with you, given the
11:58:11 circumstances, that preceded this conversation.
11:58:13 But many times this council has been very amenable to
11:58:17 not allowing the property to dry up, so that you can
11:58:19 go forward and do something else.
11:58:22 But in this particular process, what happens based on
11:58:26 our decision, very nebulous, I think it would be very
11:58:29 irresponsible given the dialogue that we have, nothing
11:58:32 personal.
11:58:32 I think I just need to see what we are voting on as
11:58:35 opposed to what we could be voting on.
11:58:39 >> And if you want to grant the discontinuance to to
11:58:42 allow for the --
11:58:44 >>ROSE FERLITA: I can't speak for anybody else but
11:58:47 again for the last time given the history, I think
11:58:49 that's the prudent way to go.
11:58:51 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Way was going to say is they are

11:58:53 trying to help you out on this situation here.
11:58:56 But it seems to me like Ms. Saul-Sena and Ms. Ferlita
11:59:01 say, there's just a lot of unanswered questions here,
11:59:04 and you are really not making it easy for us to do.
11:59:06 So the thing to do then is to go ahead and
11:59:09 discontinue.
11:59:10 Because way see here on the report is that the
11:59:12 extension of time is authorized for a period of one
11:59:16 year.
11:59:17 So maybe what you all need to do is just cool your
11:59:21 heels, sell your property and then have somebody come
11:59:23 back to us.
11:59:24 >>> And let me be clear about way was requesting
11:59:27 actually from council, is that you allow the
11:59:30 discontinuance for a one-year period of time, in which
11:59:33 time the petitioner could reestablish the use, and
11:59:37 then once it is reestablished, if you want the new
11:59:39 owner to come back before you a year after that --
11:59:46 >> That will be up to the new owner.
11:59:48 >>> But it's not a new petition it would be.
11:59:51 >>GWEN MILLER: We need a motion.
11:59:54 >> Real quick.

11:59:55 I don't -- -- this year on council, and it's been
12:00:08 before code enforcement.
12:00:09 I don't know why you would have gotten notice.
12:00:12 >> I think the tenants came before you.
12:00:15 I wasn't aware they were coming in for that.
12:00:17 >> Then that goes back to Ms. Ferlita's question of
12:00:19 who got noticed.
12:00:26 Somebody had to have -- the owner, whoever is owner of
12:00:29 record had to have given to the tenant that you all
12:00:31 would be dealing with the situation.
12:00:34 >>> I'm just not aware of it.
12:00:35 >>ROSE FERLITA: Is your mailing address --
12:00:39 >>> Yes, ma'am.
12:00:39 >> It's not possible somebody from that establishment
12:00:41 got those notices, subsequent to the complaints we got
12:00:43 from the neighbors.
12:00:44 Here it is.
12:00:45 Rob Turner had information.
12:00:47 You may not have read it but it gives us enough reason
12:00:50 for pause in terms of continuing this.
12:00:51 So there it is.
12:00:53 >>GWEN MILLER: We need a motion.

12:00:55 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Move to close.
12:00:57 >> Second.
12:00:57 >>MARY ALVAREZ: We have to close the public hearing
12:01:00 first.
12:01:02 >>GWEN MILLER: We are going to continue or close it?
12:01:09 (speaking over one another)
12:01:13 We need to continue.
12:01:15 >> For the continuance.
12:01:16 >> You're asking for an extension of time.
12:01:20 You get an active customer, client in there that can
12:01:24 reestablish the wet zoning.
12:01:26 Because we are not allowing to you extend that time.
12:01:29 Then what happens is when that tenant goes in they
12:01:34 come back and ask for a new wet zoning application.
12:01:36 It starts all over again.
12:01:37 Then we know who we are dealing W. we don't know they
12:01:40 even got notices.
12:01:41 So how do I know who you are going to put in there?
12:01:44 That would be irresponsible given the history.
12:01:49 >>> And I understand the concern.
12:01:51 It has been discontinued.
12:01:52 The use has been discontinued.

12:01:54 There is a 120-day administrative discontinuance that
12:01:57 was allowed.
12:01:57 We are asking for continuance of one -- discontinuance
12:02:02 for one year.
12:02:02 It can be reestablished.
12:02:04 If you want to place the condition on that.
12:02:07 >>> We are not approving any extension of time give an
12:02:11 appropriate date after a certain amount of time
12:02:12 elapses it will come to the council that's here at
12:02:15 that time as a new application.
12:02:17 Then that council, the sitting council at that time,
12:02:20 and a new application, not an extension of this one,
12:02:23 then will be able to decide, is it appropriate?
12:02:25 Is it compatible?
12:02:28 These things we can control to hours of operation and
12:02:31 those types of things.
12:02:32 At that point since it will be a new application, the
12:02:34 people that have been affected by the current -- the
12:02:38 client that was there before can weigh in on it.
12:02:40 Otherwise, we can't take any kind of action to assure
12:02:43 ourselves that we are acting responsibly.
12:02:45 >>> I think could you just put a condition.

12:02:48 >> No, we can't.
12:02:51 A continuance of an existing -- to not let it dry up.
12:02:59 But I'm telling you it's going to dry up and you are
12:03:01 going to come back.
12:03:04 >> Move to close the public hearing.
12:03:05 >>GWEN MILLER: Motion and second to close the public
12:03:07 hearing.
12:03:07 Question on the motion.
12:03:08 Ms. Cole.
12:03:08 >>JULIA COLE: I wanted to make sure everybody is clear
12:03:11 on what is going on.
12:03:13 And I I'm not sure that he's clear.
12:03:20 What's in front of council is a resolution that would
12:03:22 allow you to extend the date of your current wet
12:03:25 zoning.
12:03:27 If council denies that, then you're dry.
12:03:30 The only option would be for to you come back -- and
12:03:34 correct me if I am wrong -- a six-month period with a
12:03:37 new request, and a new wet zoning.
12:03:39 That's what council will be asking them.
12:03:42 I just want to make sure it was Clare for the
12:03:44 applicant.

12:03:44 >>Rose Ferlita: He keeps saying a year.
12:03:46 It's a six-month waiting period.
12:03:48 >>>
12:03:49 >> I believe it's a six-month waiting period, a new
12:03:52 application for a wet zoning can come forward before
12:03:54 council.
12:03:56 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion and second to close
12:03:57 the public hearing.
12:03:58 All in favor of the motion say Aye.
12:04:00 (Motion carried).
12:04:01 >>ROSE FERLITA: Move to deny the extension of time
12:04:03 requested by the applicant.
12:04:05 >>GWEN MILLER: Motion and second.
12:04:06 (Motion carried).
12:04:12 >> Move to open number 56.
12:04:13 >> I believe under your rules at this point -- to come
12:04:22 back at 1:30.
12:04:23 We stand adjourned until 1:30.

12:04:25 (Tampa City Council reconvened)
13:37:07 [Sounding gavel]
13:37:07 >>GWEN MILLER: Tampa City Council is called back to
13:37:09 order.
13:37:09 Roll call.
13:37:11 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Here.
13:37:12 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Here.
13:37:13 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Here.
13:37:14 >>KEVIN WHITE: Here.
13:37:15 >>GWEN MILLER: Here.
13:37:16 Before we go on to our agenda, we have some unfinished
13:37:20 business from this morning.
13:37:22 Mr. Smith.
13:37:24 >>DAVID SMITH: City attorney.
13:37:26 The issue that came up from this morning's agenda that
13:37:29 you asked me to look into was the issue of chapter 27,
13:37:34 and what we did.
13:37:35 So what I was able to do is pull the transcripts, and
13:37:39 the transcripts at this juncture are those that are
13:37:41 prepared for the hearing impaired, the ones that you
13:37:45 see going underneath the picture.
13:37:49 If you happen to have time to watch that.

13:37:52 They are not always exactly precise but they do catch
13:37:54 most of it.
13:37:56 The problem is that the motion that Mr. Harrison made
13:38:01 did not include 27-98.
13:38:03 It was 27-132, 27-137, 27-323 and 27-151.
13:38:11 But you did come back at the evening meeting.
13:38:15 Again the problem is at the evening meeting, the
13:38:17 ordinance that was read by Mr. Dingfelder included
13:38:20 27-98.
13:38:22 Let me suggest the solution.
13:38:24 I think we can use.
13:38:26 You have instructed the staff to come back to you in
13:38:29 30 days.
13:38:30 That was a week ago, on the specifically identified
13:38:34 areas.
13:38:34 Nothing prevents you from taking up 27-98 at that
13:38:37 time.
13:38:38 If you choose to make an amendment to the ordinance to
13:38:40 add back in any of the provisions that you excluded,
13:38:44 or add them back in, tailored, altered or modified you
13:38:48 are in essence amending the ordinance, we can do
13:38:50 whatever we want to do with 98 at that time.

13:38:54 That's the only -- unless somebody files an
13:38:59 application within the next 28, 22 days, whatever the
13:39:04 time period is.
13:39:04 So unfortunately that's where we are at.
13:39:07 We don't have a good basis in the record to argue a
13:39:09 scrivener's error.
13:39:10 It may have been the intent.
13:39:11 But unfortunately we don't have any contradictory text
13:39:14 to suggest.
13:39:15 I looked at the history.
13:39:17 In all candor, 166 in our charter identifying the code
13:39:22 basis for a scrivener's error.
13:39:23 But we have done it historically.
13:39:25 But in the instances that we have done it, it's been
13:39:28 an instance, for example, where the word "private" was
13:39:31 approved and appears in several points of the text and
13:39:34 appears "public" elsewhere so clearly that was a
13:39:37 scrivener's error.
13:39:37 In other instance we found there was a page omitted
13:39:40 from an exhibit.
13:39:41 In this instance I don't think we can stretch
13:39:44 scrivener's error to this.

13:39:45 By virtue of the fact that it's coming to you within
13:39:48 another three weeks or so we can address the issue
13:39:50 then.
13:39:51 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I just wanted to point out that we
13:39:53 have a special discussion meeting on chapter 27.
13:39:57 And I would be really happy to add that to the things
13:39:59 that we are discussing, which is Wednesday at noon,
13:40:03 August 3rd, which is then prayer to the Thursday
13:40:07 meeting.
13:40:08 >>DAVID SMITH: It makes sense.
13:40:10 I think you have a lot of residents of the city that
13:40:15 want to be heard on that issue and they have different
13:40:17 views and not felt like they have been adequately
13:40:20 heard so give you an opportunity to of a full hearing
13:40:22 of those considerations and decide what's appropriate.
13:40:26 Thank you very much.
13:40:26 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Wednesday, August 3rd?
13:40:29 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: 2nd.
13:40:30 I read it wrong.
13:40:32 August 2nd at noon in the Mascotte room to discuss
13:40:35 the provisions of chapter 27, extracted by councilman
13:40:38 Harrison, and Saul-Sena.

13:40:41 I would like to ask that also includes --
13:40:45 >> Can I ask why noon?
13:40:47 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: John Dingfelder specifically said
13:40:56 that and nobody else said another time.
13:40:58 >> I didn't know it was going to be at noon.
13:41:00 >> That's bad for you?
13:41:02 >> It's okay, we can't all be there.
13:41:04 >>GWEN MILLER: We go back to item number 52.
13:41:13 >>HEATHER LAMBOY: With reference to item 52, I had a
13:41:16 discussion with petitioner, and he's willing to make
13:41:18 the changes that need to be made.
13:41:20 I think there was a miscommunication between the
13:41:22 petitioner and his client.
13:41:24 And so, therefore, by tomorrow.
13:41:30 I guess we would like to request two weeks from now.
13:41:33 >>MARY ALVAREZ: So moved.
13:41:34 >> Second.
13:41:34 (Motion carried).
13:41:35 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Continue two weeks.
13:41:41 >> 10 a.m.
13:41:42 >>MARY ALVAREZ: August 3rd?
13:41:45 August 3rd.

13:41:47 >>KEVIN WHITE: Move to open 56.
13:41:49 >> Second.
13:41:50 (Motion carried)
13:42:06 >>> Land development.
13:42:09 WZ 06-87.
13:42:11 Petitioner requests 4(COP-R).
13:42:14 At 1600 east 8th Avenue, the petitioner is
13:42:19 requesting 4(COP-R) on vacant property to the
13:42:24 expanding the existing restaurant.
13:42:26 1600 east 8th Avenue, suite 8123, and they are
13:42:35 looking for the suite 1-123.
13:42:44 They are looking for an extension on it.
13:42:56 You can see there is also a residential property
13:43:03 within 1 that you feet.
13:43:04 And also institutional property within 1,000 feet.
13:43:11 That is the location in Ybor City.
13:43:14 You can waive the distance requirement.
13:43:18 There are also some conditions.
13:43:21 Because of the location.
13:43:23 There are the conditions about the security which the
13:43:30 petitioner should follow.
13:43:34 Basically that's all.

13:43:36 Land development, we don't have any objection.
13:43:47 >>> Don Miller, City of Tampa police department.
13:43:49 I have been sworn.
13:43:50 We have no objection for this particular wet zoning.
13:43:51 >>GWEN MILLER: Petitioner?
13:43:58 >>> Irene Pierpont, this extension allows the Tampa
13:44:07 Bay brewing to move into the plaza and create the
13:44:11 space they have been so desperately trying to find for
13:44:14 that portion of Ybor.
13:44:15 There are existing merchants in Ybor City which allows
13:44:18 them to keep their business there and expand it.
13:44:20 So we hope council approves the resolution.
13:44:23 Thank you.
13:44:23 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
13:44:25 wants to speak on item number 56?
13:44:26 >> Move to close.
13:44:27 >> Second.
13:44:27 (Motion carried).
13:44:29 >>ROSE FERLITA: Move an ordinance making lawful the
13:44:35 sale of beverages containing alcohol regardless of
13:44:37 alcoholic content, beer, wine and liquor, 4(COP-R),
13:44:40 for consumption on premises only in connection with a

13:44:43 restaurant business establishment on that certain lot,
13:44:46 plot or tract of land located at 1600 east 8th
13:44:48 Avenue, unit A-131, Tampa, Florida, more particularly
13:44:52 described in section 2 hereof waiving certain
13:44:54 restrictions as to distance based upon certain
13:44:56 findings, providing for repeal of all ordinances in
13:44:59 conflict, providing an effective date.
13:45:00 >>GWEN MILLER: I have a motion and second.
13:45:01 [Motion Carried Unanimously]
13:45:04 We need to open 57.
13:45:06 >> So moved.
13:45:06 >> Second.
13:45:06 (Motion carried).
13:45:16 >>> Land development.
13:45:18 Next petition WZ 06-90.
13:45:25 4910 North Florida Avenue, for 2(COP-R).
13:45:28 The petitioner is requesting to sell beer and wine for
13:45:32 consumption on the premises only in conjunction with
13:45:38 the restaurant.
13:45:38 There is a property within 1,000 feet.
13:45:44 There is also one residential property which is very
13:45:48 close.

13:45:48 And then institutional property within 1,000 feet
13:45:54 distance.
13:46:01 Council can waive the distance requirement.
13:46:09 >>> Officer Don Miller, City of Tampa police
13:46:11 department.
13:46:12 On this particular wet zoning we have no opposition.
13:46:17 >>GWEN MILLER: Petitioner?
13:46:26 >>> Todd Gable.
13:46:27 This is my wife Natalie Mandeville.
13:46:31 We have been sworn in.
13:46:34 We are anticipating opening Cathy's pizza on Seminole
13:46:37 Heights and hoping to be able to serve beer and wine.
13:46:41 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
13:46:42 wants to speak on item 57?
13:46:44 >> Move to close.
13:46:45 >> Second.
13:46:51 >>> I'm moving as fast as I can.
13:46:53 Jerry Elsworth, president of south Seminole Heights
13:46:56 civic association.
13:46:57 I have been sworn.
13:46:58 This is exactly what we're looking for in the Seminole
13:47:01 Heights community.

13:47:02 And I think it certainly falls within the business
13:47:05 strategic plan that the neighborhood has been working
13:47:07 on.
13:47:09 I don't know if you have had a chance to see this
13:47:11 building but the petitioners have taken I think it was
13:47:14 a former martial arts building but a vacant building
13:47:18 and converted it to restaurant space, and done a
13:47:22 fantastic job.
13:47:23 There's also right next to it, there is outdoor dining
13:47:26 area, which hopefully when the dog ordinance passes
13:47:32 you should go for pizza.
13:47:35 So this is a block which is becoming what we all hoped
13:47:40 would happen in Seminole Heights.
13:47:41 And the civic association is totally behind this.
13:47:44 Thank you.
13:47:45 >>ROSE FERLITA: You are absolutely right.
13:47:47 And I'm not the most observant person.
13:47:50 But I looked around and all those buildings right
13:47:52 there are coming up so wonderfully.
13:47:56 Not strong enough to oppose your petition but you
13:47:58 really should have looked at Nebraska Avenue. Anyway,
13:48:00 good luck to you.

13:48:05 >>GWEN MILLER: Move to close.
13:48:08 >> Second.
13:48:08 (Motion carried).
13:48:08 >>KEVIN WHITE: Move an ordinance making lawful the
13:48:17 sale of beverages containing alcohol of more than 1%
13:48:19 by weight and not more than 14% by weight beer and
13:48:23 wine 2(COP-R) for consumption on premises only in
13:48:26 connection with a restaurant business establishment on
13:48:28 that certain lot, plot or tract of land located at
13:48:30 4910 North Florida Avenue Tampa, Florida more
13:48:33 particularly described in section 2 hereof waiving
13:48:35 certain restrictions as to distance based upon certain
13:48:38 findings, providing for repeal of all ordinances in
13:48:40 conflict, providing an effective date.
13:48:41 >>GWEN MILLER: I have a motion and second.
13:48:43 All in favor of the motion say Aye.
13:48:44 Opposed, Nay.
13:48:46 (Motion Carried).
13:48:46 >> Move to open 58.
13:48:48 (Motion carried)
13:49:02 >>> Land development.
13:49:04 The next petition is WZ 06-96.

13:49:09 4(COP-R).
13:49:09 The location is 4009 west MLK, Jr., Boulevard.
13:49:15 The petitioner is requesting 4(COP-R) to the
13:49:22 restaurant.
13:49:24 There is one within 1,000 feet distance.
13:49:31 There are three institutional properties in 1,000
13:49:37 distance.
13:49:38 And on this petition the land development for existing
13:49:46 other use which reduced the footprint of the other use
13:49:50 to allow this wet zoning.
13:49:54 The number is WZ 06-35.
13:49:58 Land development has no objection.
13:50:09 >>> Don Miller, City of Tampa police department.
13:50:11 I have been sworn.
13:50:11 The police department on this particular wet zone is
13:50:17 in opposition based on the significant criminal
13:50:19 history at that location and I urge to you take a look
13:50:22 at my report.
13:50:24 >>GWEN MILLER: Petitioner?
13:50:36 James Diaz, 2522 West Kennedy Boulevard and I have
13:50:40 previously been sworn.
13:50:43 If I can for a second, looking at this, this whole

13:50:48 entire parcel at this point in time enjoys the S-1
13:50:52 adult special use.
13:50:55 We understand that it has been impossible to wet zone
13:50:59 where there is an adult use.
13:51:07 So with respect to this parcel, we would relinquish
13:51:10 the adult use on that parcel.
13:51:16 We have filed an application with Cathy Coyle
13:51:20 simultaneous with this wet zoning petition where the
13:51:24 main portion of the property would have a new S-1
13:51:28 special use.
13:51:33 Now, what do we have there?
13:51:35 We have a building that has a footprint of about
13:51:38 10,000 square feet.
13:51:42 What are we telling you?
13:51:43 We are telling you that we are willing to give up the
13:51:46 adult use on the portion that is operated at what
13:51:49 everybody wants to refer to as the pink pony crazy
13:51:52 horse.
13:51:53 The other portion of the building is a book store.
13:51:56 We are telling you, give up the existing S-1 special
13:52:00 use for in return for a new S-1 special use on the
13:52:06 property allowing the book store to remain, and then

13:52:10 as a 4(COP-R).
13:52:14 I'm surely going to have some people in opposition and
13:52:17 I'll save my comments as to theirs after they have
13:52:20 spoken.
13:52:20 But I would like to address the police report that got
13:52:23 filed.
13:52:25 The police report goes on to say that there have been
13:52:29 nine cases of sex-related crimes and prostitution
13:52:32 reported at this location, there have been six robbery
13:52:36 calls, and eleven burglary auto calls.
13:52:40 And that's talking about a 67-month period.
13:52:45 Of that 67-month period, my client has owned it the
13:52:48 last 15 months.
13:52:52 Now, of the nine prostitution cases, the last one
13:52:56 occurred in 2003.
13:52:58 Not a one has occurred while my client has owned this
13:53:01 property.
13:53:02 The robberies, the six that occurred, one of those
13:53:07 occurred while my client owned the property.
13:53:11 Somebody out in the parking lot.
13:53:13 Of the eleven auto burglaries that they represent in
13:53:16 this report, the last one occurred November of 2004.

13:53:19 Not a one of them has occurred while my client has
13:53:22 owned this property.
13:53:23 So they want to talk about the substantial criminal
13:53:26 history.
13:53:27 That all ended when you all SU-II it down back in
13:53:30 2003.
13:53:33 If you turn the page, they want to tell you that
13:53:35 there's 136 calls for police.
13:53:40 I went to the police department.
13:53:41 And I got a printout on this location.
13:53:46 And the either the police department gives me bad
13:53:51 numbers or there's not 139.
13:53:52 I had 112.
13:53:54 And of that 112, in the year 2003, there were three
13:54:01 arrests made.
13:54:03 In the year 2002, there were 13 arrests made.
13:54:08 In the year 2003 there were ten.
13:54:11 In the year 2004 there were zero. In the year 2005
13:54:15 there were zero.
13:54:16 In the year 2006 there are zero.
13:54:21 We can't control what happened there before we owned
13:54:24 this property.

13:54:25 But this property has been clean under our
13:54:27 stewardship.
13:54:32 I think you are going to hear some opposition.
13:54:35 And I think the thrust of it because I have seen some
13:54:37 of it is writing is going to be directed to the fact
13:54:39 that they think that they are going to continue to be
13:54:41 an adult use with a wet zoning.
13:54:44 It's not at all what's happening here.
13:54:46 They are going to come in and going to relinquish the
13:54:49 wet zoning.
13:54:50 So I'll kind of save my comments for theirs until
13:54:53 after they've spoken.
13:55:04 >> Mr. Diaz, something of clarity to something you
13:55:06 said.
13:55:06 You said you're willing to relinquish half of this,
13:55:11 and you said the other portion.
13:55:12 You said we can't kick them out.
13:55:15 >>> There's a tenant.
13:55:16 This property is partially occupied by a tenant.
13:55:26 This is MLK.
13:55:30 The portion we would be relinquish the S-1 uses runs
13:55:34 perpendicular to MLK.

13:55:36 The portion that runs parallel to MLK is leased out to
13:55:40 the tenant.
13:55:43 You saying you can't kick them out.
13:55:46 There's a lease.
13:55:47 >> there was a lease in place when you ran the
13:55:49 property.
13:55:49 >> When the lease is up, can you kick them out then?
13:55:53 >> I imagine we could.
13:55:55 >> If you want.
13:55:57 >>> More than likely we wouldn't.
13:55:58 >> You said relinquish this adult which means you have
13:56:01 no more activity in there.
13:56:03 >>> No --
13:56:07 >> Well, you said relinquish.
13:56:09 >>> I thought that my statement was you can't have two
13:56:12 adult uses in one location, you can't have wet zoning
13:56:15 on an adult use.
13:56:16 So right now, there is an existing adult use on the
13:56:20 whole parcel.
13:56:24 Communications I have had with Cathy Coyle in the
13:56:26 application that I have submitted, and my
13:56:28 understanding of the application, which is approvable,

13:56:32 is that all but the strip that is perpendicular to MLK
13:56:39 would get a new S-1 adult special use.
13:56:44 The perpendicular portion would no longer have an S-1
13:56:49 adult special use.
13:56:50 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Mr. Diaz, if you're still going to
13:56:58 have an adult book store on that -- I guess it's the
13:57:04 eastern part of the parcel, and what type of
13:57:09 restaurant are you planning to put in there?
13:57:12 And would that have any effect -- would the adult book
13:57:17 store have any effect on the type of business or
13:57:19 restaurant that you're going to have on the other side
13:57:21 of the parcel?
13:57:23 >>> What do you mean by an effect?
13:57:25 >> Well, you have an adult book store.
13:57:27 And you are going to have a restaurant.
13:57:30 What kind of a restaurant are you planning to have?
13:57:32 >>> I don't know that that has been formalized yet,
13:57:35 Ms. Alvarez.
13:57:35 My understanding is at the corner of MLK and Dale
13:57:38 Mabry, that I don't think that that car dealership is
13:57:42 going to remain there much longer.
13:57:43 We understand there's a development coming into that

13:57:45 area.
13:57:45 And we are trying to beat the punch and get ready for
13:57:48 what we understand will be happening when that
13:57:51 dealership is out.
13:57:52 >> But be that as it may, Mr. Diaz, we are talking
13:57:54 about this parcel right now.
13:57:56 And my concern is, first of all, that it's close to
13:58:02 the Baptist church for one thing, and then we also
13:58:05 have the juvenile sent area cross the street.
13:58:08 >>> That's correct.
13:58:10 >> Well, Legends Field is also there, too.
13:58:13 But I think my main concern is right now that you have
13:58:16 an adult book store on that parcel, which is going to
13:58:19 stay because it's a lease, and then you are going to
13:58:21 have some kind of a restaurant on the other side.
13:58:24 And I'm questioning what kind of a restaurant would
13:58:27 you have there that would want to be next to an adult
13:58:33 book store?
13:58:34 I mean, it's a simple question, it seems to me.
13:58:37 >>> It may seem like a simple question to you.
13:58:39 I don't know that has been finalized and I can tell
13:58:42 you that they are going to put this kind of restaurant

13:58:44 or that kind of restaurant at this time.
13:58:46 >> Could it be a gentleman's club that you're planning
13:58:48 to put there?
13:58:49 >>> Not to my understanding, no.
13:58:53 >> All right.
13:58:56 It's not going to be a Cracker Barrel or anything like
13:58:59 that.
13:59:01 [ Laughter ]
13:59:02 No, okay.
13:59:03 But that was a no, right?
13:59:05 >>> Not a Cracker Barrel.
13:59:07 I don't think we are large enough to be a Cracker
13:59:08 Barrel.
13:59:09 We are only about 4500 square feet.
13:59:12 >>GWEN MILLER: Let's go to the audience.
13:59:14 Does anyone in the public want to speak on item number
13:59:16 8?
13:59:21 >>> I want to make a couple comments.
13:59:22 The first comment was that the petitioner has advised
13:59:25 council that they would be willing to rescind a
13:59:28 portion of their adult use S-1 permit.
13:59:30 I just wanted to make council aware of the fact that

13:59:32 that's not at the present time a condition that it be
13:59:36 contained in the wet zoning ordinance that we
13:59:39 prepared.
13:59:39 In fact, if that is council's desire, any wet zoning,
13:59:46 I would ask that you ask legal to provide the
13:59:49 ordinance to include that as a condition.
13:59:50 And I just wanted to also remind City Council how it
13:59:56 works when somebody is requesting a waiver in a wet
13:59:58 zoning petition.
13:59:59 What the petitioner's burden is they have to
14:00:01 demonstrate that they meet the qualifications that are
14:00:03 contained in the regulation to be entitled for waiver.
14:00:06 In this case, what they have indicated is that they
14:00:09 are a restaurant use, and that the sale of alcoholic
14:00:11 beverages will be incidental.
14:00:14 At that point, if City Council chooses to deny this
14:00:18 wet zoning, City Council has to by competent and
14:00:22 substantial evidence, find that this wet zoning is
14:00:25 adverse to the public interest and not compatible with
14:00:27 the surrounding neighborhood.
14:00:29 You need to make a finding of fact of that nature if
14:00:32 you do in fact make a motion.

14:00:35 Thank you.
14:00:35 >>GWEN MILLER: Does anyone else in the public want to
14:00:37 speak?
14:00:40 >>> Good afternoon.
14:00:40 My name is Dr. William Clark.
14:00:42 I'm the dean of health, wellness and sports
14:00:44 technology, the Hillsborough community college.
14:00:47 I'm here speaking on behalf of Dr. Robert Chunn who is
14:00:51 the president of the Dale Mabry campus.
14:00:54 I have a letter that I'd like to -- I have a copy.
14:01:03 And I would like to read this into the record, please.
14:01:07 Dear chairperson Miller, Hillsborough community
14:01:11 college HCC Dale Mabry campus has resided in the Drew
14:01:14 Park committee for over 35 years.
14:01:17 Since 2001, when the City of Tampa department of urban
14:01:23 development and Hillsborough county-city Planning
14:01:26 Commission began working to advance the interests of
14:01:28 the Drew Park community, Hillsborough County community
14:01:32 college has been an active and committed participant.
14:01:36 HCC shares the concerns of other Drew Park residents
14:01:39 and business owners over incompatible land uses in
14:01:43 Drew Park.

14:01:45 An evidence of this confidence in the development.
14:01:49 Drew Park community, HCC will begin construction of an
14:01:53 $18 million, 420-bed student housing complex at the
14:01:58 corner of Lois Avenue and Tampa Bay Boulevard later
14:02:02 this year.
14:02:04 For the first time in its existence, HCC will have
14:02:07 resident student population of 4020 students living
14:02:11 and studying in Drew Park.
14:02:14 A 4(COP-R) designation for the crazy horse gentleman's
14:02:19 club located a quarter mile from HCC's new housing
14:02:23 student housing complex, as well as from the HCC
14:02:28 adjacent head start and campus child center -- child
14:02:33 care center, does nothing to support the positive
14:02:35 redevelopment of the Drew Park community, and
14:02:39 furthermore compromises HCC's effort to entice its
14:02:43 students to live, study, and place their children in
14:02:47 Drew Park.
14:02:48 HCC opposes the 4(COP-R) designation for the crazy
14:02:52 horse gentleman's club and urges the members of the
14:02:57 Tampa City Council to deny the request.
14:02:59 Thank you for your attention.
14:03:02 It's signed: Dr. Robert Chunn, president of the Dale

14:03:05 Mabry campus.
14:03:09 And as Dean of health and wellness and sports
14:03:11 technology, I run a dental clinic which basically sees
14:03:16 pediatric patients, Medicaid and Medicare patients,
14:03:21 and children of low income and low access patients at
14:03:26 the back of our campus, and it would also be very
14:03:29 close to that as well.
14:03:30 So I also urge you to reconsider this.
14:03:34 Thank you very much.
14:03:34 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank you.
14:03:36 Would anyone else like to speak?
14:03:37 >>RON ROTELLA: Advisory committee.
14:03:53 I'm not here as one person but a spokesperson for the
14:03:56 Drew Park advisory council.
14:03:57 >>GWEN MILLER: Have you been sworn, Mr. Rotella?
14:04:00 >>RON ROTELLA: No, I have not.
14:04:01 >>GWEN MILLER: Raise your right hand.
14:04:02 (Oath administered by Clerk).
14:04:09 >>RON ROTELLA: Yes.
14:04:10 As you know, the city contracted with the -- were
14:04:15 asked to come up with a redevelopment strategy for
14:04:17 Drew Park.

14:04:19 I believe in your file you do have a letter from the
14:04:21 planning consultants URS that's working on the
14:04:24 development plan that voices their objection to the
14:04:26 wet zoning and the proximity to the related use and
14:04:31 the Drew Park advisory committee would also like to
14:04:37 register its objection, Drew Park, other related uses
14:04:44 throughout Drew Park, legal and illegal.
14:04:47 And I do understand that they are giving up a portion
14:04:50 of the building as an adult related use but there will
14:04:53 be a portion that remains as an adult related use, and
14:04:58 ask for 4(COP-R) designation for a restaurant that
14:05:01 nobody can contemplate what it can be.
14:05:05 And we think that mixing alcohol and related uses at
14:05:13 that site is not an appropriate use and does not fit
14:05:16 into the redevelopment strategy that we hope that
14:05:18 occurs in Drew Park.
14:05:20 Thank you.
14:05:20 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank you.
14:05:21 Would anyone else like to speak?
14:05:22 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: We don't have the redevelopment
14:05:34 plan with us.
14:05:37 I know we have worked on it.

14:05:40 We have all worked on it together pretty diligently.
14:05:43 But can you refresh our memory?
14:05:49 I think are you chair of that group?
14:05:52 >>RON ROTELLA: Yes.
14:05:52 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Either you or Jeanette, refresh our
14:05:56 memory about what you have been envisioning of the CRA
14:06:02 of that subdistrict, obviously not property by
14:06:04 property but just generically.
14:06:06 What have we been talking about?
14:06:08 Have we gotten that far in our deliberations?
14:06:12 >>RON ROTELLA: We had a couple of public hearings on
14:06:15 the draft of the plan.
14:06:17 It will be finalized in a couple of weeks.
14:06:20 There will be a public hearing on the final draft of
14:06:22 the plan in August.
14:06:25 Of course, Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard is a major
14:06:30 gateway into Drew Park.
14:06:32 And we see that as a Boulevard that's improved.
14:06:37 And as far as the plan, it recognizes the significance
14:06:41 of the new road that the airport will construct a
14:06:44 4-lane divided highway from Tampa Bay Boulevard to
14:06:49 Hillsborough that will become a major new

14:06:51 transportation thoroughfare through the district, and
14:06:55 Martin Luther King will intersect with that new major
14:06:59 transportation corridor, and then what's being
14:07:01 recommended is a mixture of retail, residential, and
14:07:07 again Martin Luther King is a major gateway to that.
14:07:11 >> I do recall that discussion now that you refresh my
14:07:14 memory about a gateway.
14:07:16 There are a couple of gateways we have identified in
14:07:19 the district and that's one of them.
14:07:21 >>> That's correct.
14:07:21 >> The other question I had for either of you,
14:07:23 4(COP)s, do we have -- and maybe this is for the
14:07:29 zoning folks -- do we have other 4(COP)s nearby in
14:07:34 Drew Park, 4(COP)s or 4(COP) Rs.
14:07:47 >>> We have none in the Drew Park area.
14:07:50 We have an APS.
14:07:57 It's not considered Drew Park area.
14:07:59 >>GWEN MILLER: Would anyone else like to speak?
14:08:01 Mr. White.
14:08:04 >>KEVIN WHITE: Didn't know if petitioner had closing.
14:08:07 Actually, I have a question for the petitioner.
14:08:09 >>GWEN MILLER: Petitioner, come up, please.

14:08:13 >>KEVIN WHITE: A statement, then a question for the
14:08:16 petitioner.
14:08:16 One of the things that I'm looking at, surrounding
14:08:19 institutional uses.
14:08:26 I guess the question is, if we look at both sides and
14:08:30 see what the better of two evils, what's there right
14:08:35 now if we do not approve this.
14:08:37 And one of the things that Ms. Alvarez has been
14:08:39 strongly opposed to is adult uses since I have been
14:08:45 here on this council.
14:08:46 And petitioner, in just a moment, please correct me if
14:08:51 I am wrong because I don't want to put words in your
14:08:53 mouth.
14:08:54 You are giving up half of this use to be used on it,
14:08:57 but you're saying you can't or you won't, because of
14:09:01 the lease, if it weren't for the lease would this
14:09:08 whole thing be a 4(COP-R)?
14:09:11 >>> I don't know the answer to the question.
14:09:13 We never discuss it to be very candid.
14:09:16 We have a lease so why have that conversation?
14:09:18 We didn't have that luxury available to us.
14:09:22 So we didn't talk about it.

14:09:24 Because you couldn't do it even if we had wanted to
14:09:26 dot, we just can't do it.
14:09:28 >>KEVIN WHITE: Well, the only quandary that I really
14:09:33 have, and I know way want to say right now, not
14:09:35 necessarily for this at all, the only thing that even
14:09:39 has me thinking is that you're willing to give up half
14:09:43 of the adult use on this, and if there was any glimmer
14:09:49 hope that the other half would probably go away, and
14:09:53 this could be a restaurant on this main gateway and
14:09:57 corridor.
14:09:58 I could see it.
14:09:59 But by the same token I'm trying to look at the other
14:10:02 side and say, well, if you didn't get it, then crazy
14:10:06 horse is still going to be there, and it's still an
14:10:08 adult use with whatever activity that go on or going
14:10:15 on, but like you said in your report, those were
14:10:19 before the previous owner and I know that the negative
14:10:22 connotation that these establishments get.
14:10:26 I'm just trying to be as fair and objective in a
14:10:29 decision here as I can.
14:10:37 >>> Mr. White, if I can, and I will read part of this
14:10:40 URS let theory Mr. Rotella referred to.

14:10:42 In the second paragraph, it starts out with: The big
14:10:47 crazy horse is one of the last ten business regulated
14:10:50 businesses within the boundaries of the Drew Park CRA.
14:10:54 In addition five nonregulated adult businesses also
14:10:57 exist within this small area of the city.
14:10:59 Given the clustering effect that is the result of
14:11:02 locating 15 adult businesses within an area that is
14:11:05 roughly 1.3 square miles, the area in our opinion is
14:11:09 saturated with adult use.
14:11:11 We're telling you that we're willing to cut down
14:11:16 basically half of our adult use.
14:11:19 And you can maybe check with city staff on this.
14:11:24 I don't think once we give it up we can get it back.
14:11:30 So, I mean, if you go on and read that same letter,
14:11:34 that letter talks about the overwhelming response we
14:11:36 have heard from residents and business owners.
14:11:39 To my knowledge there's no residentially zoned
14:11:41 property within Drew Park.
14:11:43 That whole area is just about all IG.
14:11:46 Where is the residentially zoned property?
14:11:48 I'm not aware of any.
14:11:49 I believe you can check with the city.

14:11:53 Certainly in a where near us.
14:11:54 There's no way.
14:12:01 We have heard from residents in the community there's
14:12:03 something that needs to be done about adult use.
14:12:05 We are happy to bring to your attention that bringing
14:12:07 wet zoning to one of the large -- we may no longer ab
14:12:13 adult use.
14:12:14 The code doesn't allow it.
14:12:22 In all candor, we're stuck in a situation.
14:12:27 We are telling you we are willing to give up some of
14:12:29 our adult use if you will give us 4(COP-R).
14:12:36 What we are asking is if you give us one we'll give it
14:12:39 up.
14:12:39 The alternative is if you turn it down we are back to
14:12:42 status quo.
14:12:43 So which one is really better off for the community?
14:12:45 And I guess that's what you all have to decide.
14:12:48 It's our belief that you're better off by taking half
14:12:50 of our adult use and giving us a 4(COP-R).
14:12:53 And that's why we are here before you.
14:12:56 We didn't just spring out of the air.
14:12:58 And that's the ultimate decision.

14:13:00 What do you feel is best for that area?
14:13:03 Do you want to leave it as it is, a full adult use?
14:13:06 Or do you want to take back half of it and replace it
14:13:10 with a 4(COP-R)?
14:13:12 >>GWEN MILLER: The half that's going to be there, the
14:13:15 same activities will still be going on?
14:13:17 >>> No, it can't be, it can't be.
14:13:19 >> It's going to be an adult use.
14:13:21 >>> If we sell juice then we don't need an R zoning.
14:13:24 If we are going do sell juice then we don't need an
14:13:26 alcoholic beverage.
14:13:28 >> But what other parts you are going to keep in adult
14:13:31 use?
14:13:32 >>> It will be the book store that's there.
14:13:34 The book store that's been there.
14:13:38 It's the book store.
14:13:41 >> For adult use.
14:13:43 >>> That's what's been there.
14:13:44 I think you can check with officer Miller.
14:13:46 He can respond to what's been going on there.
14:13:47 I mean, we did this once before on Adamo drive.
14:13:53 The only difference was that on Adamo drive, we did a

14:13:57 4(COP-X).
14:13:59 And to my knowledge, you all haven't any problems with
14:14:02 that location since that was done.
14:14:03 And I think I did that location over two years ago, I
14:14:07 believe.
14:14:07 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Now Mr. Diaz, now that we know it's
14:14:16 crazy horse gentlemen's club, and we know what a
14:14:19 gentlemen's club is.
14:14:22 It's part adult use.
14:14:26 Because you can't see a going in there with an adult
14:14:32 book store next to you.
14:14:33 Common sense tells you something else is going to go
14:14:36 in there that's part adult use.
14:14:38 Gentleman's club is an adult use.
14:14:41 It's an incompatible us use for this area as far as
14:14:45 I'm concerned.
14:14:46 We have got a Baptist church, a juvenile center and
14:14:49 now HCC has come back and said we are going to have
14:14:52 420 students on the very next corner.
14:14:56 And you also said you don't know the residential
14:14:58 component in there?
14:15:01 Take a look between MLK and Tampa Bay Boulevard.

14:15:05 There is a residential component in there.
14:15:07 They are very sick and tired of having adult uses, and
14:15:12 even the smell of an adult use in there.
14:15:17 So if we can get rid of one, fine.
14:15:20 You're saying we are going to get rid of one but it
14:15:22 seems to me we are getting another one with a wet
14:15:24 zoning.
14:15:35 Rose Ross are you through?
14:15:37 I wanted officer Miller to come up and get some input
14:15:41 from him.
14:15:45 >>> Officer Miller, Tampa police.
14:15:47 The movement going on, based on my investigation the
14:15:51 last five months on these quote-unquote adult
14:15:55 use/restaurants, gentleman's clubs, because that's
14:15:58 what they are going to.
14:16:00 They are getting away from the adult use to the
14:16:01 gentleman's clubs.
14:16:02 And then are we trading off nudity, trading off
14:16:09 partial nudity, scantily clad dressed women?
14:16:13 I think we are kind of on the mark here, and it's
14:16:15 still an adult use.
14:16:17 It's not going to be no Cracker Barrel.

14:16:19 It's definitely not going to be anyplace where I want
14:16:22 one of my daughters working.
14:16:23 I just want to bring that to your attention that, yes,
14:16:26 it's going to be scantily clad dressed women.
14:16:29 And I don't believe that any restaurant is going to be
14:16:36 put there.
14:16:38 >>ROSE FERLITA: I just want to say something.
14:16:41 >>> I would suggest before you close the public
14:16:42 hearing you may want to hear -- let me remind you what
14:16:47 you are voting on.
14:16:47 >>ROSE FERLITA: I think I can make this comment first.
14:16:51 I know we talked about different things that we are in
14:16:53 favor of or not in favor of.
14:16:55 And as I'm looking at this, I want to remind my
14:16:58 colleagues that we are looking at this simply as a
14:17:00 4(COP) application.
14:17:02 It has nothing to do with the square footage amount of
14:17:06 an adult use that's next to the.
14:17:09 Whether there's more complicated activity is there,
14:17:11 because there might be less square footage that's
14:17:13 allocated to an adult use, or if it's the whole 10,000
14:17:17 square feet or whatever it is, I don't remember.

14:17:19 But the point is than we look at this 4(COP-R)
14:17:24 application, and look at competent, substantial
14:17:27 evidence show that shows us the reasons that you are
14:17:30 not in favor of it that you should express.
14:17:32 And I think it's an incompatibility issue just like
14:17:37 Ms. Alvarez said.
14:17:38 The fact that you have institutional uses, the Baptist
14:17:40 church 615 feet away.
14:17:42 Hillsborough County juvenile center, 367 feet away.
14:17:45 And those are reasons that I haven't supported a lot
14:17:49 of 4(COP)s or alcohol wet zoning, simply because of
14:17:53 the proximity to institutional uses and never in any
14:17:56 case have those petitions and those are not germane to
14:18:00 what we are talking about today.
14:18:01 But it's simply whether or not the 4(COP-R)
14:18:04 application is being requested is compatible with what
14:18:06 we have there.
14:18:07 Forget about the adult use, whether you like them or
14:18:09 whether we don't.
14:18:10 Nothing to do with what we should be focusing on.
14:18:13 And as well, I think there were some concerns that Ms.
14:18:15 Alvarez that again she wondered what was going to go

14:18:18 there, what type of a restaurant.
14:18:19 Again, unrelated to the adult using.
14:18:22 And that was the issue again not related to this one
14:18:25 specifically but I use the same criteria.
14:18:28 I had some concerns earlier.
14:18:29 Somebody was up here applying for continued wet zoning
14:18:32 of a spot, and we always have a concern whether we are
14:18:35 approving a wet zoning and we don't know what type of
14:18:38 establishment we are approving the wet zone for.
14:18:41 Because there are no specifics.
14:18:43 So there are a lot of concerns from my point but they
14:18:46 are strength strictly unrelated to the special use.
14:18:49 Simply incompatible.
14:18:50 Too close to institutional uses.
14:18:52 And I don't think that this is developing that area in
14:18:57 the direction that we have trade so hard to put it in.
14:19:00 So that all together yields no support for me.
14:19:06 I wanted to put that on the record.
14:19:08 >>SHAWN HARRISON: Officer, Mr. Diaz, another example,
14:19:13 diamonds out on Adamo.
14:19:17 Have you had indication to look at what's gone on
14:19:19 there since the last couple years since that

14:19:22 converted?
14:19:23 >>> Diamonds has cleaned up its act.
14:19:24 I also want to bring your attention, this is also one
14:19:29 of the businesses that was owned prior, a long with
14:19:31 the Pink Pony, that was involved in this racketeering
14:19:34 case where we went up and cleaned everything out.
14:19:36 And I want to be able to focus that, yes, it cleaned
14:19:42 up.
14:19:42 Of course, when you clean up any club.
14:19:46 >>SHAWN HARRISON: It still has a Diamonds, isn't it?
14:19:54 >>> Yes, sir, yes, sir.
14:19:54 >> Is it the bikini bars we are hearing about?
14:19:58 Or just a restaurant that would you take your family
14:20:00 to after church on Sunday?
14:20:02 [ Laughter ]
14:20:14 >>> Diamonds was cleaned up.
14:20:15 I haven't been on that particular site.
14:20:19 I believe it is full liquor now.
14:20:21 >> But it certainly does not have an adult use right
14:20:26 next -- literally, you know, sharing a common wall
14:20:29 with it.
14:20:30 >>> Right, right, a whole different.

14:20:33 >>GWEN MILLER: Ms. Saul-Sena?
14:20:37 Mr. Dingfelder?
14:20:38 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Officer, how many years have you
14:20:42 been in law enforcement?
14:20:44 >>> In law enforcement 20 years, sir.
14:20:47 >> Do you have an opinion -- Ms. Ferlita was right on
14:20:53 in that regard, we don't want to get a strike.
14:20:57 Let's talk about hard liquor, okay?
14:20:59 We are trying to bring the Drew Park neighborhood back
14:21:03 up both in a commercial sense and a residential sense
14:21:06 and an academic sense and all the different things
14:21:09 that Drew Park has a potential for.
14:21:11 We are trying to bring it back up.
14:21:13 Do you have any experience or an opinion as to any
14:21:21 negative effect that hard liquor sales would have, any
14:21:26 effect it would have on that neighborhood one way or
14:21:28 the other?
14:21:29 >>> I can tell you 20 years in law enforcement, sir,
14:21:32 and believe it or not I used to live in Drew Park as a
14:21:35 young boy.
14:21:36 I've seen that particular area decline slowly but
14:21:40 surely because of some of the adult use in that area.

14:21:45 I've also been a DUI investigator for ten years in
14:21:48 this city.
14:21:49 I watched DUIs come and go.
14:21:51 I have seen people killed over the years.
14:21:54 Seen a lot of tragedy in my time as a DUI
14:21:57 investigator.
14:21:58 Does alcohol have an impact on the community?
14:21:59 You bet it does.
14:22:01 Does it have an impact on lives and saving lives?
14:22:03 You betcha it does.
14:22:06 Do you want those things in your backyard?
14:22:08 Me, absolutely not.
14:22:09 Based on my opinion -- and I really don't count here,
14:22:11 it's your opinion and your judgment what counts
14:22:13 here -- is that something that -- that's a question we
14:22:17 could all ask ourselves, is alcohol really a positive
14:22:20 thing for all of us?
14:22:23 But scantily clad --
14:22:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Not the adult use, just the
14:22:28 alcohol.
14:22:29 >>> Alcohol to me digresses growth and development, in
14:22:33 my opinion.

14:22:33 >>GWEN MILLER: Sir, do you have something to say?
14:22:39 >>> I just wanted to remind City Council that what you
14:22:41 need to act on today is the request before you and
14:22:44 that is for a 4(COP-R).
14:22:46 If City Council chooses at this point to deny it, City
14:22:48 Council has the burden to show by substantial,
14:22:52 competent evidence that in fact what's requested, the
14:22:55 4(COP-R), is going to have an adverse impact on the
14:22:58 surrounding areas and is incompatible with the
14:23:01 surrounding uses.
14:23:02 And I would also suggest that you or the applicant
14:23:05 have the last word since there has been some
14:23:08 additional testimony here.
14:23:08 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Diaz, do you want to say something
14:23:11 else?
14:23:19 >>> Diaz: Mr. Harrison, in response to your question,
14:23:21 they share a common wall.
14:23:22 You can check with the city.
14:23:24 We had to build it to code.
14:23:26 So there is a common wall that separates them.
14:23:28 And the confusion arises from they don't have an R,
14:23:32 they have an X.

14:23:33 They don't have an R, they have an X.
14:23:34 But they do share a common wall.
14:23:40 We don't know, believe this will be a benefit to Drew
14:23:48 Park, don't know what else we can tell you but we are
14:23:56 ready to relinquish a portion of it.
14:23:58 It seems to obviate their concerns.
14:24:00 Maybe they would rather have an adult use close to
14:24:03 them, and not an R zoning.
14:24:08 Already stuck this in an adult use.
14:24:10 You can't have adult use where there's alcoholic
14:24:13 beverages.
14:24:14 State law doesn't allow it.
14:24:15 City code doesn't allow it.
14:24:17 Everybody wants to keep saying we are going to be an
14:24:19 adult use.
14:24:23 City code doesn't allow it.
14:24:25 We are here for a 4(COP-R).
14:24:28 We respectfully request you approve it.
14:24:30 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Move to close.
14:24:36 >> Second.
14:24:36 (Motion carried).
14:24:37 >>GWEN MILLER: What's the pleasure of council?

14:24:43 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I am going to move to deny this
14:24:45 petition.
14:24:46 >> Second.
14:24:46 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I think from Ms. Ferlita's
14:24:49 comments, we are directly on point.
14:24:52 My motion is not the least bit based upon the next
14:24:57 door adult use or any adult use issue.
14:24:59 My motion to deny is based upon the fact that I
14:25:02 believe we heard competent, substantial evidence and
14:25:05 testimony that this use would be adverse to the public
14:25:10 interest, that this use, this proposed use is
14:25:13 incompatible with the surrounding areas, and as Ms.
14:25:16 Alvarez pointed out, and furthermore, even though we
14:25:19 don't have a finalized plan on the CRA, and I want to
14:25:22 stress it's not finalized, but a month ago we made a
14:25:25 determination that this Drew Park area was a blighted
14:25:28 area and that we are working hard to bring it back up.
14:25:30 And that's why I asked some of those questions as
14:25:32 related to, do we have other COPs, either "R" or
14:25:39 straight COPs in the district and I think the
14:25:42 opinion was we do not, and as a result what type of
14:25:45 precedent are we establishing?

14:25:46 We are establishing the wrong press dented for an area
14:25:48 that we are trying to elevate.
14:25:50 An officer testified as to his professional opinion
14:25:52 from 20 years in law enforcement as to the effects of
14:25:55 hard liquor on a neighborhood.
14:25:56 This is adjacent to -- within 615 feet of a Baptist
14:26:01 church, within 950 feet of the motor vehicles, and
14:26:06 within 367 feet of the juvenile justice center.
14:26:09 I used to work at the juvenile justice center.
14:26:12 And I always thought it was rather unusual to be
14:26:14 driving there and seeing some of these negative uses.
14:26:17 But, anyway, with all of that said, I'll move to deny.
14:26:22 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Second.
14:26:22 >>GWEN MILLER: I have a motion and second.
14:26:25 All in favor of the motion say Aye.
14:26:26 Opposed, Nay.
14:26:28 [Motion Carried Unanimously]
14:26:28 Item number 59 cannot be heard.
14:26:39 >>THE CLERK: At this time --
14:26:49 (off microphone).
14:26:52 >> So moved.
14:26:53 >> Second.

14:26:53 (Motion carried).
14:26:54 >>GWEN MILLER: Item number 60 need to open.
14:26:58 >> So moved.
14:26:59 >> Second.
14:26:59 (Motion carried).
14:27:01 >>> WZ 06-109.
14:27:04 400 north Ashley drive.
14:27:06 Petitioner is requesting 4(COP-R) on an existing
14:27:09 restaurant, within 1,000 feet distance, there are also
14:27:17 institutionalized within 1,000-foot distance.
14:27:23 Also because of the location, the other condition, the
14:27:33 distance requirement.
14:27:35 And land development has no objection on this
14:27:37 petition. Petitioner was referred to the Tampa Police
14:27:37 Department for their review.
14:27:50 >>> Officer Don Miller, Tampa Police Department.
14:27:52 I have been sworn.
14:27:52 We have in a opposition to this wet zoning.
14:27:54 >>GWEN MILLER: Petitioner?
14:28:01 >>> Ann Pollack, 305 south Boulevard.
14:28:04 This is on the northwest corner of Ashley and Kennedy.
14:28:10 We are going to be putting in a restaurant and I don't

14:28:15 think there should be any problem but if you have any
14:28:17 questions I'm here.
14:28:18 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
14:28:19 wants to speak on item number 60?
14:28:21 >> Move to close.
14:28:24 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: My question is, is this where you
14:28:36 can sit outside and drink, also?
14:28:39 >>> Yes.
14:28:40 It's along the river side of the building.
14:28:48 >> Great!
14:28:48 I asked that because I think that would be really
14:28:50 lovely.
14:28:51 I think that's what I would like.
14:28:57 When people come up for petitions, and if you give us
14:29:00 a street address, it would be helpful in the future,
14:29:03 not now, but if you said, is this for a structure, or
14:29:06 this is a structure and an outside portion?
14:29:10 That's good information.
14:29:10 You don't have to do it now but in the future.
14:29:12 That would be good.
14:29:15 I think it's great to be able to sit outside, you
14:29:17 know.

14:29:19 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: The question is, will there be a
14:29:21 doggy drinking area?
14:29:23 [ Laughter ]
14:29:24 >>GWEN MILLER: If the dog wants to go for a swim.
14:29:29 We need to close.
14:29:30 >> So moved.
14:29:31 >> Second.
14:29:31 (Motion carried).
14:29:31 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Move an ordinance making lawful the
14:29:44 sale of beverage containing alcohol regardless of
14:29:47 alcoholic content beer, wine and liquor 4(COP-R) for
14:29:50 consumption on premises only in connection with a
14:29:51 restaurant business establishment on that certain lot,
14:29:54 plot or tract of land located at 400 north Ashley
14:29:57 drive, Tampa, Florida, as more particularly described
14:30:00 in section 2 hereof, waiving certain restrictions as
14:30:03 to distance based upon certain findings, providing for
14:30:05 the repeal of all ordinances in conflict, providing an
14:30:08 effective date.
14:30:09 >>GWEN MILLER: There's a motion and second.
14:30:10 (Motion carried)
14:30:14 We need to open the workshop.

14:30:15 >>ROSE FERLITA: I want to ask maybe Ms. Coyle
14:30:20 something.
14:30:21 Oh, she's not here.
14:30:24 >>GWEN MILLER: Cole or Coyle?
14:30:27 >>ROSE FERLITA: She's not here.
14:30:28 Just in response to what Mrs. Saul-Sena is looking
14:30:31 for, for clarification.
14:30:35 With liquor requests, don't we have a picture of the
14:30:38 footprint of what's being requested?
14:30:40 I'm sorry, you should be doing that.
14:30:41 I'm so sorry.
14:30:42 >>REBECCA KERT: Legal department.
14:30:43 Yes, it should be attached as part of your backup, the
14:30:46 footprint of what is actually being wet zoned.
14:30:51 >>ROSE FERLITA: At the same time while we are studying
14:30:53 it you can see if it's just a building or the whole
14:30:55 footprint of the parcel.
14:30:59 789 now we need to open the workshop.
14:31:01 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: So moved.
14:31:02 >> Second.
14:31:02 (Motion carried).
14:31:03 >>JULIA COLE: Legal department.

14:31:07 If you all don't mind I am going to come down here and
14:31:10 it's been a long day so I am not going to take up too
14:31:13 much of your time.
14:31:14 But I did want to let you know, and where we are
14:31:22 going.
14:31:24 >>ROSE FERLITA: The only thing gig to say is probably
14:31:27 the same thing would you say at the beginning or end
14:31:29 or in between.
14:31:29 This has been a long process as Mrs. Saul-Sena
14:31:32 probably knows in her chapter for revision.
14:31:35 We have had a very dedicated committee.
14:31:38 We did well.
14:31:39 And certainly not by my efforts, have a very good
14:31:44 cross section, people in the industry that were
14:31:46 reasonable because they want to put autopsy good
14:31:48 product.
14:31:48 They don't want to be criticized.
14:31:50 They want to do something -- they have had people in
14:31:55 our city, Ms. Massey and Ms. Grimes who are in private
14:31:59 practice, and we have had just good cooperation.
14:32:10 Mrs. Vizzi, we thanked you this morning and thank you
14:32:13 again.

14:32:14 I think it's been a very comprehensive give-and-take
14:32:17 and agreeing or disagreeing.
14:32:19 We have a ways to go yet but we thought it was time to
14:32:21 bring this up.
14:32:23 Julia, thank you.
14:32:24 >>JULIA COLE: I want to thank also all the members of
14:32:27 the committee.
14:32:28 It was one of my first assignments when I started with
14:32:30 the city.
14:32:31 I haven't been here two years yet so it hasn't taken
14:32:34 as long as some committees.
14:32:36 It took the appropriate amount of time because we were
14:32:38 dealing with some very significant issues.
14:32:41 >>ROSE FERLITA: And look how easily we forget.
14:32:44 Marty Shelby has been extremely helpful.
14:32:47 >>> Extremely helpful.
14:32:48 I actually provided members of council with a packet
14:32:52 of information in which I described the changes, and I
14:32:57 will have to give you a roster of the members of the
14:32:59 committee because I think it's important for to you
14:33:02 see who all was involved to see how he would came to
14:33:04 the consensus that we came to.

14:33:07 I just start off very quickly by saying that I think
14:33:10 the first thing is everybody agreed that the City of
14:33:12 Tampa, and this is just for the on-site sign
14:33:17 regulations, not for the billboards or anything like
14:33:19 that, that the liability for signage in the City of
14:33:27 Tampa are extreme.
14:33:28 Our signage was right above the remainder -- really
14:33:32 the State of Florida but specifically the jurisdiction
14:33:34 as round us.
14:33:35 And I actually provided you in tab 4, the packet that
14:33:40 I gave you, is a comparison chart of the building
14:33:47 signs indicating what the City of Tampa has, had at
14:33:51 this point, what other jurisdictions V. and I think
14:33:53 that was our starting point.
14:33:55 I don't think anybody on the committee disagreed with
14:33:57 the concept that the city allows too much signage.
14:34:01 And what's in our code is too much.
14:34:04 So we started off with those comments.
14:34:07 From there we did look at other jurisdictions.
14:34:09 We did look specifically at Hillsborough County's
14:34:12 regulations.
14:34:15 It's a very long process of revising their sign code

14:34:20 and Rebecca Kert came over from the county to the city
14:34:22 as we were finishing up and we were able to have a --
14:34:27 and you will see a lot of the changes we made are
14:34:29 based on Hillsborough County's regulations but not
14:34:31 all.
14:34:31 And then some of our regulations that we are proposing
14:34:34 are based on other jurisdictions.
14:34:36 Clearwater also did a terrific job in amending the
14:34:40 sign code to reduce the amount of signage.
14:34:42 That was the premise that we started under.
14:34:44 If you look in the memorandum, which is under tab 1, I
14:34:50 detail many of the non-size changes, and I can just
14:34:56 briefly touch on each one of those.
14:34:59 As to what we did with the sign, how we are going
14:35:01 to -- what we are proposing in terms of making the
14:35:04 signs smaller, lower to the ground and reducing the
14:35:09 amount of signage.
14:35:11 The first issue on page one of my memo is government
14:35:17 signs.
14:35:18 And the fact that government signs, the way the code
14:35:20 currently is, government signs, from current sign
14:35:24 regulations, and I think everybody felt it was

14:35:26 appropriate, unless and accept for the reasons that
14:35:30 the public felt health, safety and welfare to require
14:35:33 the government size current regulations.
14:35:36 The second issue is window signs.
14:35:38 And I think this is actually a significant issue for
14:35:42 everybody.
14:35:43 Everybody has been seeing the proliferation of some of
14:35:46 these businesses that actually paste signs to their
14:35:55 window, sign upon sign and you really can't see in the
14:35:58 windows anymore. That is something we all struggled
14:36:00 with but everybody felt strongly about it.
14:36:02 And currently the regulation in the city, you can have
14:36:04 window signs totally not part of your wall signage,
14:36:10 25% of each one of your windows.
14:36:12 We have reduced that dramatically.
14:36:15 What we are proposing is that window signs only
14:36:20 allowed to have five feet per establishment, which
14:36:24 that is a dramatic change.
14:36:26 And that is something that I will tell you the
14:36:29 committee was very strong on.
14:36:32 Everybody was pretty committed to that.
14:36:34 We all felt very comfortable with that number.

14:36:36 So that's one of the changes we are proposing.
14:36:39 Weep don't currently have a specific requirement or
14:36:42 sign code for sign that is separate and apart from all
14:36:47 signage.
14:36:48 And our other sign annal has been so significant that
14:36:50 it really wasn't a question.
14:36:52 But we are proposing reducing so much of our signage
14:36:54 that we actually create add separate category for
14:36:57 address signs, that we ensure that businesses don't
14:37:00 just take up all their signage with their sign and put
14:37:04 the address there.
14:37:05 Another issue that was a pretty significant issue --
14:37:10 >>MARY ALVAREZ: A lot of these convenience stores have
14:37:12 a lot of these signs that are given to them by the
14:37:16 beer companies.
14:37:17 What are you doing about those?
14:37:19 >>> Currently, those, if they are 25% or less of the
14:37:24 window area, are fine.
14:37:26 They can have it.
14:37:27 You can have anything in your window that's 25% or
14:37:30 less of your window area.
14:37:31 If it's 25% or more then it would technically be in

14:37:34 violation.
14:37:37 We are proposing to change that.
14:37:39 And I will also tell you that one of the proposed
14:37:43 changes is for nonconforming signs.
14:37:47 How are we going to make these changes and ensure that
14:37:49 these changes occur?
14:37:50 And as you know, we can only have a nonconforming sign
14:37:55 regulation.
14:37:57 We are proposing to strengthen that.
14:37:58 But the one type of sign, which will not allow us to
14:38:01 be quote-unquote grandfathered in, is the window
14:38:04 signage.
14:38:06 That's in our opinion -- those come down, so that is
14:38:11 something that that will not be -- there will be a
14:38:14 little bit of grandfathering just to give people time
14:38:17 for those regulations but that portion will not have
14:38:19 the same grandfathering in that other types of signage
14:38:22 will.
14:38:23 And I'm kind of speaking fast because I wanted to
14:38:26 get -- there are other people that want to speak so
14:38:29 just stop me if I'm going too fast or if you have a
14:38:31 question.

14:38:33 And the next one I was going to speak about is
14:38:36 temporary banner signs.
14:38:37 And I think this has also been a fairly significant
14:38:42 issue. The way our current regulation reads is you
14:38:45 can without a permit have a temporary banner for a
14:38:47 certain period of time.
14:38:49 But the problem is that certain period of time comes
14:38:52 and goes, and the temporary banner actually becomes a
14:38:55 permanent banner and it does become an usual you for
14:38:57 code enforcement.
14:38:58 One of the things that we're recommending is first of
14:39:01 all require the temporary banners are actually
14:39:04 permitted to give us kind of when the clock will start
14:39:08 ticking, and second of all, specifically state where
14:39:11 those temporary banners can be.
14:39:13 Pretty much now, there really is no standard except
14:39:18 for right-of-way standards.
14:39:19 So we are proposing that change.
14:39:21 The nonconforming sign regulations --
14:39:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: (off microphone) is that per
14:39:35 location?
14:39:35 Or like per message?

14:39:40 I'm on page 3 of your underlined strike-throughs.
14:39:47 >>JULIA COLE: I think it's intended to be per parcel.
14:39:54 That probably does need to be clearer.
14:39:59 I think it's sort of inherent in that permitting
14:40:01 process but I can clarify that and make sure it's
14:40:03 clear.
14:40:07 >> I'll leave it up to you.
14:40:09 >>> Nonconforming signs, how we currently deal with
14:40:11 nonconforming signs, as a general matter, is if you're
14:40:15 not in compliance with the current regulations as they
14:40:17 currently are.
14:40:18 Again, this isn't an issue because we allow so much
14:40:21 signage.
14:40:21 Nobody is too concerned about taking down what they
14:40:23 have and putting up a new sign because there's so much
14:40:26 allowability.
14:40:27 But what we currently have is that you do not have to
14:40:30 comply with the current sign code unless the property
14:40:37 is under major renovation.
14:40:39 We are changing that.
14:40:42 That if you all have property that's undergoing a
14:40:46 change of use which is specifically defined in here,

14:40:52 you all are required to put up new free standing sign,
14:40:56 new pole sign, unless you can show that the sign that
14:40:58 you currently have complies with the wind load
14:41:02 standard.
14:41:03 And this is an effort to get rid of old signs to
14:41:07 ensure safety, and to deal with the questions that
14:41:10 will come before you, which is one of economic
14:41:13 feasibility.
14:41:13 People who just put up a new sign may feel that we are
14:41:18 just going to force them to take down the sign that
14:41:20 they just put up, and get into economic questions.
14:41:25 This is a method by which we can force some of these
14:41:29 older signs to come down when you have a change of use
14:41:31 in the property, and the entire parcel, and ensure
14:41:35 safety.
14:41:35 So that was something that we all felt was a good
14:41:38 compromise.
14:41:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: What I'm curious about on that one,
14:41:43 I think we have all seen examples of this.
14:41:45 To tear down a building, leave the pole up, and it's
14:41:49 pretty obvious why, want to keep it grandfathered, you
14:41:51 know, a big sign or what have you, so then what I

14:41:56 would guess is, when they rebuilt the new building or
14:41:58 maybe it's even a renovation, they leave the box, but
14:42:03 they just change the message on the surface of the box
14:42:06 in that same side.
14:42:08 Okay?
14:42:09 So what I'm wondering about is, if you change the use,
14:42:14 but it meets the wind standards, but it's a new
14:42:19 business, why shouldn't that new business need to
14:42:22 conform to the new size requirements that we have?
14:42:27 >>JULIA COLE: And I will tell you, that was the
14:42:29 subject of a lot of debate.
14:42:30 The question of whether or not -- anytime there's a
14:42:32 change of use you put up a new sign.
14:42:34 Tanned change of use is defined pretty narrowly.
14:42:37 Right now, major renovations, that's pretty much, I
14:42:40 think, almost 75% of a strip center, or you are really
14:42:46 talking about a significant amount of having to change
14:42:49 out.
14:42:49 The change of usage.
14:42:55 Let me read the definition.
14:42:56 When the principle use are a part of the shelter and
14:42:59 or the property is altered from one use to another or

14:43:01 altered from construction of a property to a new use.
14:43:07 County almost be anything in that multi-occupancy
14:43:10 parcel that's being changed out.
14:43:12 And what we didn't want to create, and one of the
14:43:14 thought processes was, if you're changing just a small
14:43:18 business out, do you want to force them to get a new
14:43:21 sign?
14:43:22 Some people would suggest you do and some people would
14:43:25 suggest you don't.
14:43:25 But we chose to tie it more to a safety issue.
14:43:29 If that sign is going to be -- older sign that doesn't
14:43:33 comply with the new regulation, it would -- even if
14:43:37 you are just changing out, say, one of four, you
14:43:42 should comply with wind load standards because it's
14:43:44 not just a question of the visual but also a question
14:43:47 of safety.
14:43:47 So that was the intent, was to tie it to not just the
14:43:53 aesthetics but to the safety issue.
14:43:58 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I was concerned that we weren't
14:44:03 making enough progress fast enough unless we capture
14:44:06 them when they do change the use, regardless of wind
14:44:10 standards and that sort of thing.

14:44:12 I think what you all have done -- I mentioned you
14:44:17 worked very hard for two years.
14:44:19 What you have done is a good step in the right
14:44:21 direction.
14:44:22 I think we should consider even further.
14:44:25 >>JULIA COLE: And I think that that is something that
14:44:28 is up to council.
14:44:29 I will tell you that there are many on the committee
14:44:32 who felt anytime one of the uses in a multi-occupancy
14:44:38 parcel, new signage.
14:44:39 And I think there were some others that were
14:44:42 concerned.
14:44:45 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: And with that example, that can be
14:44:47 the exception that I would understand, you know, to
14:44:52 change one tenant, why should they have to do the
14:44:54 whole sign?
14:44:55 That might be the exception that we let go.
14:44:58 But when they change the use, I don't know why they
14:45:05 shouldn't have the sign conform like we have them
14:45:08 conform to everything else when we change the use.
14:45:10 Anyway, you can continue.
14:45:12 >>> I think that is one of the things we can go ahead

14:45:13 and look at and decide whether or not making that
14:45:15 change is something council would like to us do.
14:45:17 >>ROSE FERLITA: You know, John, there are a lot of
14:45:22 these things that we continue to kick back and forth
14:45:24 and kick back and forth.
14:45:25 But we felt like if we continued to do it at that
14:45:28 level as a committee, that we would never get the
14:45:30 feedback.
14:45:31 And so that's what this is about.
14:45:33 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: To move ahead.
14:45:35 >>ROSE FERLITA: Yes, and then with feedback from you
14:45:38 all.
14:45:39 I want to wait till the end of your presentation but I
14:45:41 can't because I'm impatient.
14:45:44 As I acknowledge some of these people, I didn't
14:45:46 acknowledge some of the other ones, and I want to tell
14:45:48 you again, John, when you said you have done a hard
14:45:51 job.
14:45:52 Sometimes I wouldn't even be this.
14:45:55 Della Curry, you would probably appreciate this, was
14:45:58 the person that organized, that sent the e-mails out.
14:46:01 And so we caused less controversy because we had this

14:46:05 issue in budget hearings last week.
14:46:09 We wouldn't have the problem of what they brought up
14:46:13 last week.
14:46:14 But it was just a really collaborative effort of
14:46:17 cooperation and commitment.
14:46:20 >>> And I am going to interrupt myself and back slide
14:46:24 into that.
14:46:25 With Della Curry.
14:46:28 Mostly, she organized everybody and everything.
14:46:31 Each of the meetings were done, done appropriately.
14:46:34 So I wholeheartedly agree.
14:46:36 It was an absolutely pleasure working with her, and
14:46:39 remains.
14:46:40 >>ROSE FERLITA: I'm sorry to interrupt you.
14:46:42 >>JULIA COLE: Oh, that's not a problem. The next item
14:46:46 is the electronic message signs.
14:46:48 And I will tell you right now that is not an issue
14:46:54 that we came with consensus on.
14:46:55 Currently no activated signs are allowed in the city
14:46:58 and that definition of activated sign includes LCD
14:47:02 type signs, electronic message board.
14:47:05 What there has been is a historic policy, changeable

14:47:09 signs are allowed and manual changeables, get the
14:47:12 stick out and move things around.
14:47:15 As technology has changed, it has been a policy that
14:47:18 the electronic message signs can be used instead of
14:47:23 the manual changeable signs but they are not allowed
14:47:27 to change more than once in a 24-hour period.
14:47:35 I will tell you there's not consensus.
14:47:37 Some on the committee said we should go further.
14:47:40 Hillsborough County, I believe, has allowed electronic
14:47:42 message boards that change -- I want top say every six
14:47:46 seconds.
14:47:48 There was a lot of movement there.
14:47:49 So that is something we don't come with consensus on.
14:47:52 But I would recommend that at the very least we would
14:47:55 want to codify the current policy, or if we don't want
14:47:58 to do that, no electronic signs in the city at all
14:48:02 regardless of new technology.
14:48:04 And we only want the ones you can change manually.
14:48:07 So that's going to be a question for you all.
14:48:11 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: There is a board right now where
14:48:15 the time and temperature change constantly, and they
14:48:18 are interspersed with "buy milk "ow let's say.

14:48:26 I know the time and temperature changes but I didn't
14:48:29 think you were allowed to put the "buy milk" in there.
14:48:33 In.
14:48:35 >>> In fact aren't even allowed to have the time and
14:48:37 temperature change the way the code is.
14:48:41 >> Code enforcement, if you are watching, do I have a
14:48:43 location for you.
14:48:45 But they do this all up and down Kennedy, Platt
14:48:50 Street, Dale Mabry --
14:48:53 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: The time and temperature, they
14:48:55 shouldn't change it but every 24 hours?
14:48:59 >>JULIA COLE: Once every 24 hours.
14:49:01 [ Laughter ]
14:49:02 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Whatever you do, Julia, it needs to
14:49:07 be clear.
14:49:07 >>JULIA COLE: What I am going for on that issue is
14:49:12 codifying the current allowability.
14:49:15 That doesn't mean you are not going to hear from some
14:49:17 folks that believe that we should go further.
14:49:20 And there may be a middle ground at some point in
14:49:23 terms of making certain locations, et cetera.
14:49:26 But I want to point out to you what I am doing, what I

14:49:28 am proposing to you, that there is not consensus.
14:49:31 That is probably the only issue, we did not have
14:49:33 consensus on.
14:49:41 >> Are they grandfathered in?
14:49:43 >> Some are.
14:49:44 There are some time and temperature signs that are
14:49:46 grandfathered in.
14:49:47 I know reading of the code today, I believe those are
14:49:51 considered activated signs and technically -- but you
14:49:55 don't want to the say they all are because they are
14:49:58 all ones -- there are one that is are grandfathered
14:50:00 in.
14:50:01 To say otherwise probably wouldn't be a fair -- a fair
14:50:04 representation.
14:50:05 Under no set of circumstances is there any
14:50:07 allowability to allow the flashing or the moving
14:50:11 electronic signs to vary.
14:50:13 No way if you read our code can you allow that.
14:50:16 That's clearly an activated -- activated sign.
14:50:20 I'm recommending codifying the current policy which is
14:50:22 to allow electronic signs in lieu of a changeable copy
14:50:27 sign, but have a 24-hour minimum, that they can't

14:50:32 change more than once in a 24-hour period.
14:50:34 But the only issue we had consensus on in the
14:50:38 committee and all members of the committee that would
14:50:40 like to address that issue and I respect as we move
14:50:43 forward in this progress and as we bring this forward
14:50:46 to more and more folks, there will be more and more
14:50:48 folks who have a commentary on that issue.
14:50:52 I think that's going to be an issue we are going to
14:50:54 hear more about.
14:50:58 >> The only thing I would like to discuss on the
14:51:00 electronic signs is the geographic issue.
14:51:05 I think we have had this discussion before.
14:51:07 But I think downtown, in all downtown, across the
14:51:10 nation, it seems like an appropriate vibrant thing to
14:51:14 have, is, you know, maybe we'll have our own little
14:51:17 mini-Times Square.
14:51:19 I don't think there's anything inappropriate about
14:51:21 electronic signs in a downtown area.
14:51:25 And we would have to define what downtown means and
14:51:28 that sort of thing.
14:51:30 But I think it kind of adds to the vibrancy and
14:51:35 enthusiasm and excitement of downtown.

14:51:36 >>> And that may be something where we are reviewing.
14:51:42 Just on the downtown sign mode.
14:51:43 Our committee specifically looked at downtown signage.
14:51:46 But I have put a couple things in here.
14:51:48 Because right now, there is no dedicated sign
14:51:57 regulation for downtown.
14:51:59 For now for purposes of clean-up, the CBD district,
14:52:04 commercial district designation, by definition, either
14:52:08 one, it would have been fine.
14:52:13 Note that the downtown is subject to the sign code.
14:52:16 I will recommend at some time in the future probably a
14:52:22 specific downtown sign regulation, as we have every
14:52:25 other overlay district with specialized district.
14:52:28 And I think downtown is probably the only one that
14:52:30 doesn't have that.
14:52:31 That's not only the discussion for today but note that
14:52:33 particular issue.
14:52:34 And also to note maybe that's an inappropriate place
14:52:37 to have a discussion of whether you want different
14:52:40 types of electronic signs.
14:52:42 >>MARY ALVAREZ: You may as well include the CBD
14:52:47 district while you are at it because that's coming in.

14:52:49 That's the Channelside district.
14:52:50 >>JULIA COLE: Channelside already -- well, you're
14:52:55 right, that's kind after new specialized district.
14:52:58 I can move forward in that.
14:52:59 That may be a good place to start to look at the
14:53:01 specific downtown signage.
14:53:04 >>MARY ALVAREZ: That's pretty new.
14:53:05 That might be a good place to start.
14:53:09 With making sure that they have got a proliferation of
14:53:12 signs in there.
14:53:14 And I like signs but I don't like where they are all
14:53:20 over the place.
14:53:21 What are you doing about banners?
14:53:23 Because that was a big topic, too.
14:53:25 Did you change anything on banners?
14:53:27 >>JULIA COLE: What we have done with the banner
14:53:29 ordinance, currently there is no permit -- which will
14:53:36 be -- putting up temporary banners.
14:53:43 It's really difficult to enforce the temporariness of
14:53:46 the temporary banner regulation.
14:53:48 And we are recommending designating where those
14:53:52 temporary banners are actually allowed to be located.

14:53:58 >> Are you talking about permitting fees, too?
14:54:01 >>> Uh-huh.
14:54:01 >> Do you have a fee schedule somewhere?
14:54:03 >>> That would just be permitted as any other sign is
14:54:06 permitted.
14:54:11 Didn't discuss how we deal with sign permit fees.
14:54:15 But our sign code categorizes the sign regulations and
14:54:19 therefore not requiring a permit, the temporary
14:54:23 banners will now no longer be exempt to the extent
14:54:27 that they are required.
14:54:29 They are not required to have a permit so they would
14:54:31 be treated as any other sign for purposes of
14:54:35 permitting.
14:54:36 >> So like the group at USF, they have their own
14:54:38 banners, that's private property, I guess.
14:54:41 >>> Uh-huh.
14:54:41 >> Do they have to have permits to do that?
14:54:44 >>> If you are going to have a banner on the
14:54:45 right-of-way, then we do have a banner on the
14:54:47 right-of-way.
14:54:47 You are talking about under the way these regulations
14:54:50 are written, they would be required to now comply with

14:54:54 the code for two reasons.
14:54:55 One, they no longer -- signs for safety, public and
14:55:00 welfare which would be required to comply with permit
14:55:03 regulations and the second would be now they would be
14:55:05 required to have a temporary banner.
14:55:13 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I didn't see in here in usually
14:55:17 older pedestrian or historic areas, or little hanging
14:55:24 signs over the sidewalk, like the --
14:55:32 >>> This would take away from some of those
14:55:34 regulations.
14:55:39 Goes down without these changes.
14:55:43 >>ROSE FERLITA: Are we going to talk about historic
14:55:45 signs?
14:55:46 >>> We are going to talk about historic signs.
14:56:01 The whole -- the whole sign.
14:56:06 In fact a sign of multi-color.
14:56:16 To recognize the way our sign code reads there's not a
14:56:19 specific permitting.
14:56:28 A wall sign.
14:56:29 And then they will be required -- another is the
14:56:33 amount of signage you are allowed for a wall sign.
14:56:36 You can have a sign on your awning in lieu of another

14:56:39 sign.
14:56:39 The awnings in and of themselves will have to be a
14:56:42 single color, and supposed to be opaque, so as you are
14:56:53 driving by in order -- because the problem is and the
14:56:55 trick is you don't want to discourage -- the trick is
14:57:02 to allow people to still want to put on awnings on the
14:57:05 businesses, while at the same time discouraging the
14:57:10 types of awning signs, and I think part of that is the
14:57:15 large amount of availability signage, another place to
14:57:20 put your awning signs.
14:57:21 When you couple this regulation with our building sign
14:57:24 regulation, I think you will see -- finally the
14:57:29 commercial district regulation as I indicated, I'm
14:57:35 proposing a change to the CBD.
14:57:41 The next thing I wanted to touch on very quickly is
14:57:43 what we have for the two big types, what they call the
14:57:50 pylon signs and the wall signs.
14:57:52 That's the big issue.
14:57:53 And currently, our sign code allows the pylon free
14:58:01 standing signs to be 35 feet, if it's located on a
14:58:06 principle arterial or highway or 18 feet on other
14:58:10 streets.

14:58:13 What our proposal is is not the height, but it's a
14:58:19 little more complicated than that.
14:58:24 This is what they do in other jurisdictions, that the
14:58:29 minimum height would be 10 feet, 5 feet from the
14:58:31 roadway.
14:58:33 And as you move back you can get higher, but no higher
14:58:35 than 20 feet.
14:58:37 And the intent is to encourage -- to give the owner of
14:58:46 the property an opportunity if they want to put it a
14:58:49 little closer, they will be a little shorter.
14:58:51 If they want to put it a little further away it can be
14:58:54 a little taller.
14:58:55 That is really the purpose behind that.
14:58:56 And what we are really doing is monument signs, if you
14:59:01 want to be closer, you can be lower, as long as you
14:59:04 meet the site try you angle.
14:59:07 Again if you want to move further back, you can go a
14:59:10 little bit higher.
14:59:13 And we think that it will encourage businesses if you
14:59:16 don't want to have your sign next to somebody else's
14:59:19 sign you can go a little higher.
14:59:20 That's one of the big changes.

14:59:22 The second, and I think this is probably the biggest
14:59:25 change.
14:59:29 >> Where are you looking?
14:59:31 >>> Pa page 4, tab 1, existing and proposed.
14:59:39 Concerns of the area of the sign, the size of the
14:59:41 sign.
14:59:42 Square feet of display area for each lineal feet of
14:59:45 frontage, or 300 square feet, whichever is less.
14:59:49 And so we are getting gigantic signs.
14:59:52 I mean, they are huge.
14:59:53 They are practically billboard size.
14:59:55 And I think the committee was very interested in
14:59:57 reducing that.
14:59:59 What we are proposing is to have signs at a maximum of
15:00:04 50 feet square.
15:00:05 So this is a drastic reduction.
15:00:08 And 507 square feet -- square feet, and minimum of 20
15:00:13 feet, maximum of 50 feet depending on your frontage.
15:00:17 We are talking a very significant -- this is a change
15:00:21 that is similar to Hillsborough County the change and
15:00:22 they went to this kind of minimal signage
15:00:27 allowability.

15:00:28 Clearwater has done the same thing.
15:00:29 And that's why the nonconform regulations become very
15:00:33 important, and how strict you are with the
15:00:35 nonconforming requirement, to keep the signage because
15:00:45 it's going to be a drastic change.
15:00:47 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: When I sat on the variance board,
15:00:50 it also served as the -- at the time we had a lot of
15:00:57 petitions for sign variances, especially up in New
15:00:59 Tampa, and the company came in with like a big Home
15:01:03 Depot that was set way back from the road and they
15:01:06 want add variance because even the signage that we
15:01:11 were granted under the at the time was a lot, it
15:01:14 wasn't enough.
15:01:16 So the long question, shortened, are these type of
15:01:21 requirements set in stone, 50 feet maximum?
15:01:24 Or can they still go to the Variance Review Board for
15:01:27 a waiver?
15:01:31 >>> If you can show the hardship requirements in the
15:01:35 area.
15:01:37 >> Can we include in the ordinance, as you -- can we
15:01:41 include in the ordinance a specific provision that if
15:01:45 they want to exceed that 50-foot that the committee

15:01:51 agreed on, that they can only come to council for
15:01:53 that?
15:01:54 >>JULIA COLE: If that's your wish, we can draft the
15:01:56 regulation.
15:02:08 >> If we want to put this here versus here, that
15:02:10 tweaking thing.
15:02:11 But if we are going to have an absolute maximum that
15:02:13 we really believe should apply to the whole city, then
15:02:16 I think a variance of that maximum should come to
15:02:19 council and not to a delegated board.
15:02:24 >>ROSE FERLITA: Let me answer that, John.
15:02:27 You're right.
15:02:28 If we as a body decide this is reasonable and it's
15:02:31 going to be drastically different, people are going to
15:02:33 automatically oppose it and start asking for variances
15:02:36 or waivers or what have you.
15:02:39 If you think that that's something that council can
15:02:42 support in terms of workload, that will make it less
15:02:47 likely that you will have a lot of exceptions.
15:02:50 Because if we had crafted this, we are probably going
15:02:53 to abide by it more than any type of board.
15:02:57 But that council is going to have some bigger agenda.

15:03:06 How much proliferation.
15:03:07 But if you're making this rule you are probably going
15:03:10 to be the one to stick to it more than somebody else.
15:03:14 >>MARY ALVAREZ: I think that's a good idea, too.
15:03:24 >>JULIA COLE: I think you should be aware, I think
15:03:28 once you put these regulations in play, it's very
15:03:33 possible that you will see a lot of variance.
15:03:35 And that should be something you all keep in mind,
15:03:38 because I think you will see a lot --
15:03:43 >> And like I say, all the variances of this council.
15:03:48 But on that issue of maximum square footage, I think
15:03:52 that's something that we can sell hard line and the
15:03:56 message will get out there, don't bother coming back.
15:03:58 >>ROSE FERLITA: That's the crux of it, John.
15:04:02 If do you that, absolutely.
15:04:03 But if you don't, there's a tweaking mechanism and
15:04:05 they are going to come and if you set a press dented
15:04:07 by doing that, then remember just like everything
15:04:10 else, if you give too many exceptions then why did do
15:04:13 you this?
15:04:14 And I say you because I am not going to be here.
15:04:17 But that's one of the decisions we'll make.

15:04:21 >> I have a question for Ms. Ferlita and the sign
15:04:23 committee.
15:04:24 I have been impressed by the time controls that we
15:04:27 have across the bay in Pinellas County and I wonder if
15:04:30 you all -- I think that it might be interesting.
15:04:36 As we debate all this, and the public thinks about it,
15:04:39 as they visit some of the communities and see the
15:04:42 differences in the communities, where they have the
15:04:45 more sign control, there's such a qualitative
15:04:48 difference.
15:04:48 And some of them aren't very far away.
15:04:51 >>: And we didn't physically go on a field trip, but
15:04:54 Julia and some of our other committee members did go
15:04:56 through a lot of trouble making comparisons and
15:04:58 bringing them back.
15:04:59 You're it root right. That's not quite the same as us
15:05:02 going there and seeing it but everybody had a
15:05:06 comparison.
15:05:07 >>JULIA COLE: I was going to say the same thing.
15:05:10 We didn't go on a field trip.
15:05:13 And I am going to ask him to come forward.
15:05:16 As soon as I finish this.

15:05:19 To say that he has done a tremendous effort to make us
15:05:22 all aware of what's going on, and not just within the
15:05:25 city but throughout the entire area is an
15:05:32 understatement.
15:05:33 >>ROSE FERLITA: Linda, what he did was he brought the
15:05:35 city of Clearwater's sign to us.
15:05:43 So that's why we rehashed and hashed again.
15:05:47 >> So really it was very amazing.
15:05:49 Mr. Smith was very involved, and some of the other
15:05:53 sign regulations, in drafting those.
15:06:01 He was also a member of the sign industry.
15:06:03 The two of them just did a phenomenal job.
15:06:06 Really bringing it to us, making our lives easier,
15:06:09 realizing that we are busy and they do this every day,
15:06:11 and looking at signs.
15:06:16 Really it was wonderful.
15:06:17 And in fact he's going to get up and talk a little
15:06:19 about that.
15:06:20 But I am going to stop there. One more things to talk
15:06:23 about and that's the wall building signs and then I am
15:06:25 going wrap it up and let you hear from some other
15:06:28 folks.

15:06:29 The wall sign issue per the current regulation is two
15:06:35 square feet of building frontage facing a public
15:06:38 street that you measure when you get two square feet.
15:06:43 The problem with our current regulation that allowed
15:06:47 you to have one wall sign if you were a single
15:06:50 occupancy parcel, one wall sign for each establishment
15:06:55 in a multi-occupancy park.
15:06:57 And that regulation of signs, we are talking about a
15:07:00 strip center.
15:07:01 But say you are talking about a six-story building,
15:07:05 establishment in there having wall signage
15:07:07 allowability, you are now talking about a significant
15:07:10 amount of signage.
15:07:12 We are reducing that.
15:07:16 To one and a quarter building frontage abutting public
15:07:22 street, from 2 square feet to one and a quarter square
15:07:26 feet.
15:07:26 And you get one building sign for single occupancy and
15:07:30 one building sign for each establishment, and for each
15:07:34 establishment with a main door entrance.
15:07:37 If you are in a building, and you have a door to the
15:07:41 street, you get a sign.

15:07:44 If not, they are going to have to be on the.
15:07:55 In your packet, Gloria Moreda and her staff have
15:07:58 provided some pictorials showing in terms whereof
15:08:04 things can be located and what will this will look
15:08:06 like.
15:08:06 I am not going to go through those for now.
15:08:09 I am going to turn it over to Mr. Smith because he's
15:08:11 got all the fun stuff to look at.
15:08:16 And seeing some of the fun stuff that Mr. Smith has.
15:08:21 And I would recommend that we go ahead and listen to
15:08:23 him,.
15:08:25 >> One more question on the -- clearly we have permit
15:08:33 fees for people to come in who want to put up a sign.
15:08:40 If we don't have already, I think this city needs a
15:08:43 permanent sign inspector committed to sign inspection.
15:08:51 My guess is we don't have it and we go to the
15:08:53 administration and they say we can't afford it.
15:08:56 We understand the budget.
15:08:57 I think it should be just like other building permits.
15:09:00 I think that we should increase the permit fee for
15:09:03 signs to pay for that building-
15:09:09 That sign.

15:09:12 >>MARY ALVAREZ: It depends on how much the permit fees
15:09:15 are right now.
15:09:16 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Regardless.
15:09:18 Even if it's a dollar, and you have 50,000 permits a
15:09:21 year, that would pay for that.
15:09:22 >>MARY ALVAREZ: I am really thinking about USF right
15:09:26 now.
15:09:40 And the corporations that they would be paying to see.
15:09:45 >>> We could pay for the inspector with fines from
15:09:48 illegal signs.
15:09:49 >>ROSE FERLITA: Let me explain something here.
15:09:51 Last year, we created a committee.
15:09:54 Mr. Rotella, you were on it.
15:09:56 I was on it.
15:09:57 Was Marty Shelby on it?
15:09:58 I don't remember.
15:09:59 We went to the mayor's office and had a meeting.
15:10:01 And we are going to be going through a lot of work on
15:10:04 this before -- the first step is bringing it to
15:10:08 council.
15:10:08 And every time we talk about stuff, and that's
15:10:13 enforcement.

15:10:14 And we need an inspector that could do some of this
15:10:17 stuff.
15:10:18 Mr. Rotella went through the trouble of talking to
15:10:21 some people at FDOT, and we give you the authority to
15:10:27 site or to pull or do whatever you want, so we can
15:10:30 have a way of making less sign pollution.
15:10:33 We couldn't do that then.
15:10:34 And we are not going to be able to do that now even
15:10:37 after we refine this.
15:10:39 And that's going to be something we have to address.
15:10:42 The increase of fee to get the inspector salary
15:10:45 covered earlier, or the permitting fees that we have
15:10:48 now.
15:10:49 Do we ask the administration to consider allocating
15:10:52 those to be reinvested in this?
15:10:54 I don't know.
15:10:55 That's another step.
15:10:56 And there were a bunch of steps that we needed to talk
15:11:00 about.
15:11:00 But if we needed to do that at the committee level --
15:11:05 you have to remember many of our conversations in code
15:11:07 enforcement, we need to have enforcement.

15:11:09 Let's see what we do with that once we decide how to
15:11:12 make these revisions.
15:11:29 >>> Commercial site review supervisor, and the signs
15:11:34 for zoning compliance.
15:11:36 I worked with signs for 30 years, developed a number
15:11:40 of sign ordinances that were adopted, that were quite
15:11:48 liberal or signs that had always been much of a
15:11:54 lightning rod.
15:11:55 And I appreciate the aspects you are going through
15:11:57 especially when Tampa has allowed such a generous sign
15:12:02 allowance.
15:12:03 And generally, generally now, a sign ordinance that
15:12:07 reduce that is significantly is going to have a lot of
15:12:09 concern.
15:12:10 But regarding your question about the logistics, we
15:12:15 charge a $55 use fee for every sign.
15:12:19 And then there's a permit charged for the beginning of
15:12:25 sign permit which is 35 to $75 based on the type of
15:12:27 sign.
15:12:28 And so we typically review 60 signs a month.
15:12:35 So 725 a year would be a good standard to work with,
15:12:43 if you are talking about a budget that could support a

15:12:47 sign inspector.
15:12:48 You can do the math.
15:12:49 Currently, we have been told by our directors, we are
15:12:54 not raising fees.
15:12:55 And so we get to you to determine whether or not that
15:13:00 is appropriate based on the issue.
15:13:09 >>MARY ALVAREZ: Would you reiterate about the fees?
15:13:11 I have $55 for the permit --
15:13:15 >>> The fee to make sure that it complies to the sign
15:13:18 ordinance as well as the building code.
15:13:21 >> Okay.
15:13:22 >>> And then after the sign plan is approved,
15:13:30 permitted for a wall sign or free standing sign based
15:13:33 on 35 to $75 based on the size, cost and so forth.
15:13:47 >> Are you relatively new to Tampa, is that right?
15:13:50 >>> Two years.
15:13:51 >> Have you done any research, how long since the
15:13:54 dollar amounts have been changed?
15:13:58 Have they been modernized, I guess is the question.
15:14:14 >>> In chapter 5, everything stayed the same.
15:14:16 So I think over ten years, it's been five years since
15:14:21 many of the building schedules.

15:14:25 But I don't know about the sign code.
15:14:28 >> And the other thing is, and you are obviously
15:14:30 familiar with the industry, very familiar with the
15:14:31 industry, and I think we have some industry folks
15:14:33 here.
15:14:36 My guess is when you go to order a sign from the
15:14:38 industry, you're going to spend, depending on the size
15:14:46 of the plan, how fancy it is and whatever, spend a few
15:14:49 hundred dollars to thousands of dollars, tens of
15:14:52 thousands of dollars maybe if it's really fancy and
15:14:54 big, right?
15:14:55 >>> Yes.
15:14:56 >> So right now, those permitting fees are extremely
15:14:59 incidental, I would guess.
15:15:01 I mean, you are talking about 35, $55 for the
15:15:07 incidental expense when you're talking about thousands
15:15:09 of dollars.
15:15:13 Is that fair to say?
15:15:16 >>> Yes, it is.
15:15:17 >> Mary, I think the critical number -- and we can
15:15:19 talk about this another day, too -- right now there
15:15:22 are 720 sign applications a year on average.

15:15:27 So if you added, just for argument sake, $100, just
15:15:32 for argument sake, $100 for each one of those, then
15:15:36 would you end up with $72,000 a year which would
15:15:38 easily fund the inspector position.
15:15:42 I'm just throwing that out there to say that's the
15:15:45 kind of number we could work with.
15:15:47 Now, we could make it $50 and that means we could
15:15:50 raise $35 a year.
15:16:03 >>MARY ALVAREZ: and I'm trying to digest what you're
15:16:05 saying except I think we would get a lot of people
15:16:08 over here saying, $100 more?
15:16:10 Wow, you know.
15:16:12 I think maybe incrementally doing it, or maybe a
15:16:17 smaller sign.
15:16:24 And it's been over ten years since anything has been
15:16:28 done
15:16:38 >>> There are a lot of visuals.
15:16:41 I worked on ordinances where it's based on the square
15:16:43 feet of signs.
15:16:44 As you mentions, it encourages small signs with small
15:16:48 fees.
15:16:48 The larger the sign the larger the fee.

15:16:51 There are a number of ways you can skin the cat.
15:16:53 >>MARY ALVAREZ: We don't want to skin a cat.
15:16:55 We want to make it compatible, or where people could
15:17:01 really digest this.
15:17:10 >> I just can't remember.
15:17:11 Did we make a comparison of our fees versus
15:17:14 Hillsborough County?
15:17:15 Remember that, Julia?
15:17:22 Is that something that somebody can do for added
15:17:25 discussion?
15:17:27 $70, period, for anything?
15:17:29 A baby sign and a big sign?
15:17:31 $70?
15:17:38 That's not good.
15:17:39 We are going to have to look for someplace else for
15:17:41 dollars.
15:17:42 We are going to have to compete or people are going to
15:17:44 be putting those signs right over the boundary.
15:17:51 If it's too onerous, and they say, heck, I can get
15:17:55 started in the business, and if it's more competitive
15:17:58 in the county, you know.
15:18:00 We had that conversation about occupational fees,

15:18:02 remember?
15:18:03 >>JULIA COLE: I would like to ask Mr. Smith to come
15:18:09 up.
15:18:14 >>ROSE FERLITA: Nice tie, by the way.
15:18:17 >>> Bob Smith, the owner of electric sign company.
15:18:19 I'm a state certified electric sign contractor.
15:18:22 And I have been with Hillsborough County on their
15:18:24 committee writing the last reviews, also on this new
15:18:27 committee.
15:18:27 And we have done some bet are things here with the
15:18:33 city than we did with the county.
15:18:34 We improved on it just a little more.
15:18:36 Way want to show you --
15:18:53 >> We like the fancy audio visual presentations.
15:18:58 We like that.
15:19:20 >>> Right now, in the City of Tampa, this is the way
15:19:23 your signs look in the City of Tampa.
15:19:25 When the City of Tampa, the code right now, take the
15:19:31 square footage, and take the whole outside, and figure
15:19:37 out the square footage, and this is what you call a
15:19:48 pole sign.
15:19:55 Low to the ground.

15:19:57 But with the current code, monument signs have 15-foot
15:20:02 setbacks.
15:20:06 The pole sign has 5-foot setbacks.
15:20:08 So what we did, we got together and we got rid of the
15:20:11 word pole signs, monument signs.
15:20:15 >>ROSE FERLITA: Why don't you grab the hand mike in
15:20:17 case somebody can't hear you.
15:20:18 Thanks.
15:20:21 >>> What we did was we combined the two signs, pole
15:20:24 signs.
15:20:25 Now we are calling them free-standing signs.
15:20:32 This is a typical -- I don't think you can see all of
15:20:44 it.
15:20:45 >>> It looks good.
15:20:46 >>> That Sarasota free standing sign.
15:20:48 You notice there's some embellishment.
15:20:50 And there's fancy pole.
15:20:56 We have got -- gotten a way with the new code now, we
15:21:05 are going to be architecturally designed to the
15:21:09 bidding.
15:21:09 In this case, we did a nice job on the sign anyway.
15:21:16 I am going to show you other signs here.

15:21:23 There's another free standing sign.
15:21:26 >> I would call that a monument sign.
15:21:28 >>> Yes, would you call that a monument sign but we
15:21:30 are going calling it a free standing sign.
15:21:32 We are going to move that free standing sign five feet
15:21:34 up to the property line, where it used to be back 15
15:21:38 feet.
15:21:41 Now, the city with the current code right now would
15:21:48 count Tampa whole sign for square foot.
15:21:53 The sign is actually -- that is the sign.
15:21:57 The rest of it is structure.
15:22:03 Not be penalized for the square foot annal.
15:22:06 We are going to count the sign area.
15:22:11 So whether or not you have this architecture because
15:22:15 we have all this extra square foot that we can work
15:22:17 with.
15:22:19 >> Is there a limit on your architectural --
15:22:22 >>> Yes, there is.
15:22:22 And I have a drawing hear for you.
15:22:25 >> Everything is subject to review.
15:22:29 >>> Of course.
15:22:32 Here's one architecturally designed.

15:22:37 Now remember going back to free standing.
15:22:38 Free standing sign.
15:22:40 Forget the piling.
15:22:42 Forget the pole.
15:22:43 Free standing. This has to be 15 feet in height.
15:22:46 15 feet in height, at 10-foot, 5-foot setback.
15:22:54 We every five feet we go back another foot.
15:22:58 We have a roof.
15:22:58 We have nice columns here.
15:23:00 And we have a nice little base around here.
15:23:03 But we limit the space around the sign to three feet
15:23:07 in any direction to three feet.
15:23:13 Another one we did in Ruskin.
15:23:46 You will not see the poles anymore.
15:23:47 You will not see the structure.
15:23:49 A single pole.
15:23:56 That pole would be covered.
15:23:57 And it must be covered by a 30-inch space.
15:24:00 Now it could be covered with brick, block, wood,
15:24:03 stucco.
15:24:05 But we have to cover it.
15:24:07 You are not going to be seeing the structure.

15:24:08 We are going to get a little more architectural.
15:24:11 This one happens to be in Hillsborough County.
15:24:12 And you notice that the sign cabinet matches the
15:24:15 building.
15:24:17 This is where we are going.
15:24:18 The county is going this route, too.
15:24:20 And the city, that's what we want to do.
15:24:22 We want to get architects.
15:24:25 And the pole sign, around the monument sign.
15:24:31 You might say, well, monument signs, we want to lower
15:24:37 it to the ground.
15:24:40 And the problem is, when we came up with that 10-foot
15:24:44 height with a 5-foot setback it would be too low to
15:24:47 the ground.
15:24:48 And we found this in Hillsborough County.
15:24:58 This is what you wind up with.
15:25:01 So we are going to get everybody to move the sign up
15:25:06 higher.
15:25:07 In order to do that, this is another picture of that.
15:25:15 That's also a sign.
15:25:16 And that sign there is at our maximum height.
15:25:19 So you can pick or choose which way you want do go.

15:25:23 But we are still going to have the architectural
15:25:25 development into it.
15:25:27 Another one is a design here, that if you decide, you
15:25:32 would call this a monument, we call it free standing.
15:25:36 If you decide you want to bring this base all the way
15:25:38 to the ground, no clearance, that's what we call free
15:25:43 standing signs.
15:25:46 Free standing signs.
15:25:51 Here's another one.
15:25:52 This is a beautiful free standing sign.
15:25:55 Now, on square footage, you are going to be noticing
15:25:58 that.
15:26:01 This one here, with the new code, the roof does not
15:26:13 count as part of signage.
15:26:14 Just sign itself.
15:26:17 Remember, 300 square feet to 50 square feet.
15:26:22 350.
15:26:23 So here's where we are going to look for maximum
15:26:27 square footage.
15:26:28 Here, this is a different type of sign.
15:26:30 Now this has the letters into the metal.
15:26:34 So they could count this whole entire area here.

15:26:39 But that's not the sign, that's the structure.
15:26:44 It needs to be up, down and around the letters.
15:26:47 That's your square footage.
15:26:48 Even though it's built a little differently.
15:26:50 That's where we are going with some of these
15:26:52 structures.
15:26:54 >>MARY ALVAREZ: What about the other side of the sign?
15:26:57 >>> Same thing.
15:26:57 Same thing.
15:26:58 Now remember, we only count one side of the sign.
15:27:03 Even though Hillsborough County, they are at 100
15:27:06 square feet, they still get 50 square feet per side.
15:27:09 So that's what we are doing.
15:27:10 We are kind of following Hillsborough County's code.
15:27:17 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Bob, just out of curiosity.
15:27:20 Ballpark estimate, that's that sign we are looking at
15:27:22 right there, give or to ta $1,000.
15:27:26 >>> Oh, 20,000.
15:27:27 >>: Give me some other ideas.
15:27:32 >>> 8,000.
15:27:40 Probably about 12, 15 that you.
15:27:44 >> I just wanted to put that into context, Mary.

15:27:49 He said 10,000, 15,000, 20,000, in the context, if we
15:27:55 have a fee structure that is adjusted a little bit up.
15:28:01 Spending money on signs, an extra 50 bucks.
15:28:09 >>> There's some preliminaries before you can get down
15:28:11 to the city for the permit.
15:28:17 We have a package rate whether at this time city or
15:28:19 the county that runs from had to 500 dollars.
15:28:23 If you look for the Florida State certified engineers
15:28:27 or any of them, and there's 125 to $150 engineering.
15:28:33 Now, we have to come down to the city.
15:28:40 But we are up to 200 some odd dollars right off the
15:28:43 top.
15:28:43 Now we have to make two trips down to the city.
15:28:46 Okay.
15:28:47 Drop it off.
15:28:52 I don't know if you want to add any more to this.
15:28:55 Personally, I think the way to go, have code
15:28:57 enforcement -- county has five sign code inspectors.
15:29:09 >> There's five people to do that.
15:29:10 We aren't there yet.
15:29:11 And we have to figure a way to fund it.
15:29:13 And I am not trying to burden the industry or anything

15:29:16 else.
15:29:16 But I figure if it hasn't been visited in ten years.
15:29:21 >>> Well, some counties that we do work in, they go by
15:29:24 the cost of the sign.
15:29:27 That's probably the fairer way.
15:29:28 Tau a 4 by 8, just a simple little sign, the cost for
15:29:33 engineering, it's going to cost the same for that
15:29:36 permit, whether it's a $50 that you sign or $200 sign.
15:29:40 It's tough to go in there with a $500 sign and you
15:29:43 have to give $400 for a permit.
15:29:47 That might be the fair way.
15:29:49 >>ROSE FERLITA: Bob, that comes back a little bit to
15:29:52 where I am kind of in disagreement with Mr.
15:29:54 Dingfelder, because seems like we would have to bite
15:29:56 the bullet and get some of the code unrespectors to
15:29:59 initiate the fees from citations, when you start
15:30:03 having that be reinvested as opposed to what the
15:30:07 expenses are already.
15:30:08 I think with all the violations that we were talking
15:30:14 about, it would be pretty quick that if you have code
15:30:18 enforcement officers allocated, could you get enough
15:30:21 revenue right there to just jump start, and then

15:30:24 self-support.
15:30:26 One thing too that we talked about, and I really like,
15:30:28 and I didn't think about this, because I didn't know
15:30:30 the comparison of how they measure the county and we
15:30:33 measure here, on the signs that Bob showed us, it's
15:30:35 really nice because in a city we are measuring the
15:30:38 total thing.
15:30:39 So, you know, because you want to advertise your
15:30:42 business as much as you can, you want that whole space
15:30:44 to be used up on but now without too much
15:30:50 exaggeration, we have that 3-foot board area round
15:30:53 that you want it to be pretty because it represents
15:30:55 your business.
15:30:56 That's one of the changes that I think we need because
15:30:58 it makes it look pretty big, on some of their space
15:31:01 that they don't want to give up.
15:31:06 >>> Absolutely.
15:31:06 Is there any question about the monument or pole
15:31:08 signs?
15:31:09 >>GWEN MILLER: That's it?
15:31:13 Moving on.
15:31:14 There's more.

15:31:14 >>GWEN MILLER: It's getting late.
15:31:15 >>> We are going to get into the wall signs here.
15:31:18 And what we are finding is that the city, when you
15:31:26 encounter a wall sign, and I have a great picture
15:31:29 here -- 1.25 for every linear foot.
15:31:46 But the way, the proper way to address this wall
15:31:49 sign --
15:32:29 The way the city looks at wall signs right now, this
15:32:34 is a set of individual letters put on the wall.
15:32:38 So we don't want to count part of the wall as the
15:32:42 sign.
15:32:42 We want to count the sign.
15:32:45 It has to be on.
15:32:47 And has LED.
15:32:50 We are going to LED now, because it's a lot more -- 12
15:32:56 volts, the same price.
15:32:57 We give a five-year warranty on it.
15:32:59 We are going to go back and talk about the electronic
15:33:02 signs.
15:33:02 It's kind whereof we are going with that.
15:33:05 Under wall signs here, City of Tampa would take the
15:33:09 individual channel letters that I show you there and

15:33:11 they would draw a rectangle, a 32-square foot sign.
15:33:17 The proper way to do this is what Hillsborough County
15:33:20 does, is you draw a recollection tangle round.
15:33:28 Come up with 20 square feet. This is a proper way to
15:33:31 do a wall sign.
15:33:32 Right now, the way they do, for example, you get an
15:33:38 ice cream cone, and it said Tom's ice cream.
15:33:42 They make the ice cream cone a little bigger than the
15:33:44 actual copy.
15:33:45 Well, the city would go around that big rectangle but
15:33:48 all the background space counted most of the wall as
15:33:51 the sign.
15:33:52 The sign is this.
15:33:53 This is what we are trying to bring into the new code.
15:33:56 I think it's going to work out very well.
15:34:01 Any questions on wall signs?
15:34:02 Okay.
15:34:07 Electronic signs.
15:34:08 Here's one you all know.
15:34:10 Electronic signs.
15:34:11 Now remember, we are talking about going from 300
15:34:14 square feet now to 50 square feet per sign.

15:34:19 And naturally, we really like electronic signs.
15:34:24 We like them.
15:34:25 There's if we are going from 300 square feet down to
15:34:30 50 square feet you have a multiple occupancy parcel,
15:34:36 each one of the stores is going to have a chance to
15:34:38 get on there, have some kind of advertisement.
15:34:41 Because you know the great big signs, you have already
15:34:43 seen in Brandon, we are bringing down a lot of them
15:34:45 now going to 50 square feet and some of the copies is
15:34:48 so small you have to stand next to the to see it.
15:34:50 With electronic signs going, that will take care of
15:34:53 that.
15:34:54 Electronic signs, in the State of Florida, state owned
15:34:57 electronic signs, no permits required, they can run
15:34:59 whatever they want.
15:35:00 Florida State fairgrounds, big sign.
15:35:02 USF.
15:35:05 Sole color electronic signs.
15:35:08 HDC.
15:35:11 Plant High School.
15:35:12 Plant High School sign is an electronic sign.
15:35:15 All these signs stay on, no restrictions.

15:35:21 Now let's talk about the City of Tampa electronic
15:35:23 signs.
15:35:24 Performing Arts Center.
15:35:26 Convention center.
15:35:29 Tampa Theatre, the old Tampa Theatre.
15:35:31 Three electronic signs.
15:35:33 And the aquarium.
15:35:34 Four electronic signs this city owns.
15:35:37 Now, if it's good enough for the city, and it's good
15:35:41 enough for the state, it's good enough for all of us.
15:35:44 And there are no restrictions on those at all.
15:35:48 Those signs are moving every day.
15:35:49 They are advertising.
15:35:50 >>MARY ALVAREZ: we can change that.
15:35:53 >>> Then you can change it.
15:35:54 It has to be one or the other.
15:35:56 We don't see it as a safety issue because people say,
15:35:58 oh, I'm going to get in an accident while readding the
15:36:01 sign.
15:36:02 Well, if that were true they would have shut these
15:36:05 signs down a long time ago.
15:36:07 There's no evidence that that really happens.

15:36:08 So that's where we are going with electronic signs.
15:36:11 But if you are going to have an electronic sign, you
15:36:14 reduce the square footage way down.
15:36:16 Now you can do what you want.
15:36:20 Anything else would you like to ask me?
15:36:22 >>ROSE FERLITA: No, that's enough from your point.
15:36:25 You are establishing some guidelines and criteria and
15:36:27 that's where we are going to have to byte the bullet
15:36:30 themselves.
15:36:30 Remember a few years ago when Charlie Miranda was the
15:36:33 chairman, when we don't like signs but on road
15:36:37 construction we have this billboard that advertises
15:36:39 all the names why do you need the council members so
15:36:42 big?
15:36:43 Somebody else has to make a smaller sign.
15:36:45 So what's good for what we dictate should be the same
15:36:47 criteria that we use as a government so that's going
15:36:49 to be something, too.
15:36:51 It's not fair.
15:36:59 >> Thank you, Bob.
15:36:59 >>JULIA COLE: I think we should maybe go ahead and
15:37:02 wrap this up.

15:37:02 You all have had along day that's a lot of information
15:37:06 to take in.
15:37:07 And what I am going to suggest at this point, unless
15:37:12 they have something they want to submit, that what we
15:37:15 dot Do is take in some of the comments that we heard
15:37:18 today, and go ahead and put this into an ordinance
15:37:23 form, and send it out, so T.H.A.N. and some of the
15:37:29 interested parties, Tampa Bay builders association,
15:37:31 schedule another workshop, and bring it back to you.
15:37:34 In the meantime, see if you want to call me with any
15:37:38 additional comments or questions and we can go ahead
15:37:40 and gauge some of the reaction to some of these
15:37:42 issues.
15:37:43 I think we indicated at the beginning of this that the
15:37:46 electronic sign issue is probably the only issue.
15:37:50 But I think as you can see, it's something fairly
15:37:56 dramatic but not so dramatic, other jurisdictions will
15:38:01 be encouraging taller signs, prettier signs, better
15:38:05 design, and comply with the architecture of the
15:38:08 building, and that it really will be something that
15:38:14 will reduce the amount of signage in the City of
15:38:16 Tampa, which again everybody thought was very

15:38:18 important.
15:38:21 Again, and I will have to say it again, this was a
15:38:23 pleasure.
15:38:24 The members of the sign committee were an absolute
15:38:27 pleasure to work with.
15:38:28 I think this is a really good process.
15:38:31 And it was a really good starting point.
15:38:35 And we'll see where we go from here.
15:38:38 >>ROSE FERLITA: Thanks to you, too.
15:38:39 >>GWEN MILLER: We need to close the workshop.
15:38:41 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Question.
15:38:43 Real quick.
15:38:44 I'm sorry.
15:38:44 Ms. Miller, I don't know if you were here during the
15:38:47 discussion about the fee and the possibility of
15:38:54 dedicated sign inspector.
15:38:56 But anyway, I think everybody on council would like to
15:39:00 have that discussion continue with the administration.
15:39:04 And if we need to do an ordinance, I don't know if
15:39:07 these fees are in the ordinance or not.
15:39:09 If they are, then we should address it in this
15:39:11 ordinance change, and if it's not in the ordinance,

15:39:15 fine.
15:39:23 Cindy Miller: I think our department is now growth
15:39:26 management and development services, as of this
15:39:29 morning.
15:39:34 What I just want to mention, I think best approach at
15:39:36 this point is not to be concerned with this ordinance
15:39:39 for that purpose.
15:39:40 I think what we need to do in administration is work
15:39:43 with my colleague in code enforcement, work with my
15:39:45 staff, because I think we have to first determine what
15:39:49 we want to have accomplished before we look at the
15:39:51 permit.
15:39:52 It has been about five years since construction
15:39:54 service center had a permit adjustment as to how it is
15:39:58 calculated.
15:39:59 And somebody who continually does look at revenue
15:40:05 sources.
15:40:05 But I want to be able to measure the work performance
15:40:08 first.
15:40:09 So we'll be back at a later date.
15:40:11 I don't think it's something that needs to be done as
15:40:13 part of this ordinance.

15:40:14 >>GWEN MILLER: Need to close the workshop.
15:40:16 >>MARY ALVAREZ: So moved.
15:40:16 >> Second.
15:40:17 (Motion carried).
15:40:17 >>GWEN MILLER: Any information by council members?
15:40:29 >>ROSE FERLITA: In a.
15:40:29 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Two quick things.
15:40:32 I have some handouts for the council members from
15:40:34 today's arts council meeting. The arts council is
15:40:37 doing some phenomenal things in our community, for
15:40:41 older people and then activities for school children
15:40:43 that are just so impressive and wonderful.
15:40:46 And I want to share those with you all.
15:40:48 And secondly, we had a great meeting yesterday morning
15:40:51 about undergrounding.
15:40:52 And there is new rules coming out of Tallahassee,
15:40:56 which encourage it.
15:40:57 And I will share that information as well.
15:41:01 >> Thank you.
15:41:02 Mr. Dingfelder?
15:41:03 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Yes.
15:41:05 I have been having ongoing discussions with Gloria

15:41:08 Moreda and Roy LaMotte regarding residential fences or
15:41:12 near the right-of-way, and I won't bore with you those
15:41:14 details.
15:41:14 But anyway, it was suggested I put this in the form of
15:41:20 a motion so I will.
15:41:21 I would like a report back from staff in, let's say,
15:41:26 eight weeks on this issue.
15:41:28 Residential fences on or near the right-of-way.
15:41:33 >>CHAIRMAN: Motion and second.
15:41:34 (Motion carried).
15:41:35 >>GWEN MILLER: Anything else?
15:41:47 (off microphone).
15:41:48 >>GWEN MILLER: I have a motion and second.
15:41:51 >>THE CLERK: Zoning administrator decision.
15:41:57 And we have set it originally for September 7th.
15:42:00 But as of this week we have received a letter asking
15:42:02 for it to be withdrawn.
15:42:06 I just want a motion.
15:42:08 >> So moved.
15:42:09 >> Second.
15:42:09 (Motion carried)
15:42:10 >>THE CLERK: Based on the July 13th e-mail from

15:42:19 Gloria Moreda, application was consistent with section
15:42:22 27-272-D, city code, it's better to withdraw the above
15:42:30 referenced appeal.
15:42:31 >>GWEN MILLER: Anything else?
15:42:41 >>> 15-20.
15:42:44 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I believe tomorrow is the last day
15:42:46 when people can submit their application for the
15:42:48 Planning Commission.
15:42:49 And I wanted for us to go ahead and set a date when
15:42:51 the applicants are going to appear before council.
15:42:53 Because some of the people who called me about it have
15:42:56 wondered when we are going to come and get it on their
15:42:58 calendar.
15:43:02 We are going to have a vacancy on the Planning
15:43:04 Commission.
15:43:04 And we haven't yet set the date for them to come
15:43:09 before council.
15:43:11 >> I'm confused.
15:43:12 Was that to Planning Commission?
15:43:16 >>THE CLERK: We received about four.
15:43:21 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Set a time now because people have
15:43:28 been calling and asking, I know that City Council has

15:43:31 this process of having us appear before council, when
15:43:34 is it?
15:43:35 I said, I don't know.
15:43:36 I called the clerk.
15:43:37 And the clerk said we haven't set it yet.
15:43:39 So I was just suggesting.
15:43:43 Can we please not dot on August 17th?
15:43:47 >>GWEN MILLER: Tomorrow is the deadline.
15:43:56 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: So anybody that's interested.
15:44:02 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Can we do it on the 24th?
15:44:04 When do we usually hear?
15:44:09 >>GWEN MILLER: 9:30.
15:44:14 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: How long do we give them, two
15:44:16 minutes, three minutes?
15:44:17 >>ROSE FERLITA: Depending on how many applicants we
15:44:21 get, let's determine how much time we can allocate.
15:44:26 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: No more than three minutes.
15:44:27 >>ROSE FERLITA: Oh, no more than three minutes.
15:44:29 >>THE CLERK: I believe the last time you had three
15:44:32 minutes but I believe also you had an interview
15:44:34 process you gave them one minute apiece.
15:44:37 >>> The last time we had like 15 people.

15:44:43 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: No, that was the --
15:44:46 >>ROSE FERLITA: Then give them two minutes.
15:44:49 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: So I make a motion that we give the
15:44:51 people who ar replying for the vacancy on the Planning
15:44:53 Commission two minutes on the 24th at --
15:45:01 >>ROSE FERLITA: With the understanding they know
15:45:02 coming.
15:45:06 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: To share their thoughts.
15:45:09 >> Motion and second.
15:45:09 (Motion carried).
15:45:10 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'm sorry, one other thing.
15:45:14 I'm sure several of you have noticed and many of our
15:45:17 residents have noticed, across -- the Bayshore from A
15:45:21 cross from the tower, the city constructed an 8-foot
15:45:24 tall, I call it, a bunker, a concrete building, and we
15:45:29 have gotten a lot of calls and lot of complaints about
15:45:31 the concrete structure, and people say why are we
15:45:35 building it, and this and that.
15:45:37 I just want to make known, the wastewater department
15:45:40 is building it to house an emergency generator.
15:45:45 Emergency generators are extremely important to our
15:45:47 wastewater system especially for emergency

15:45:49 preparedness.
15:45:49 And that was the folks at their request along with
15:45:54 Pete Daignault.
15:45:55 And they are acknowledging the fact we need to have a
15:45:58 generator nearby.
15:45:59 But they are asking that perhaps we can reconsider the
15:46:01 location of it.
15:46:02 Because it's very unsightly, and I talked to the mayor
15:46:06 about it as well.
15:46:08 But Steve Daignault is a good guy, and he agreed that
15:46:12 we would at least look at some alternative locations.
15:46:17 Of course always the function is money and that sort
15:46:19 of thing.
15:46:19 But anybody who is watching that's upset about that
15:46:21 concrete bunker just know that the city is looking at
15:46:25 it.
15:46:25 We can't guarantee what the end result will be.
15:46:27 But we are looking at alternatives.
15:46:29 >>ROSE FERLITA: Where does Mr. Daignault live?
15:46:33 >>GWEN MILLER: We now go to our audience portion.
15:46:36 We have one person that wants to speak.
15:47:14 (city Council adjourned)