Help & information    View the list of Transcripts

Thursday, November 5, 2009
9:00 a.m. Session

The following represents an unedited version of
realtime captioning which should neither be relied
upon for complete accuracy nor used as a verbatim
The original of this file was produced in all capital
letters and any variation thereto may be a result of
third party edits and software compatibility issues.
Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the
proceedings may need to hire a court reporter.

>>THOMAS SCOTT: City Council will now come to order
and the chair will yield to the honorable Mary
09:02:25 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
09:02:28 This morning we have the honor of our wonderful city
09:02:30 council clerk, Shirley Foxx-Knowles, will do the
09:02:34 invocation for us.
09:02:35 Please stand for the invocation and remain standing
09:02:38 for the pledge.
09:02:38 >> Good morning, council.
09:02:42 O Lord our Lord, how excellent is Thy name in all the
09:02:46 earth.
09:02:47 I will praise Thee, O Lord, with all my heart.
09:02:51 Gracious father, thank you once again for this
09:02:53 beautiful fall morning at this place and this time.
09:02:58 Bless our council members and make them instruments of
09:03:00 your will with.
09:03:02 Lead them as they make decisions that affect the lives
09:03:05 of the citizens of our fair city.
09:03:08 Guide them so that they do that which is acceptable in
09:03:11 your sight and is uplifting for the residents of our
09:03:16 city.
09:03:17 Lead them in the right way.
09:03:19 Father, we thank you for your grace and your mercy.
09:03:23 Thank you for how you blessed us of the you have been
09:03:25 so good to us, and we are truly grateful.
09:03:28 Please continues to protect our citizens here in
09:03:32 Tampa, and provide your protections to those on the
09:03:36 front line working hard to keep us safe.
09:03:39 Protect our troops overseas, and when their job is
09:03:43 done, bring them back safely to their loved one withs.
09:03:46 And now, O Lord, as we go about the worldly matters of
09:03:51 this city, let us remember to be kind to each other,
09:03:54 provide service with a smile, and be worthy of your
09:03:58 love.
09:03:59 These things we ask and thanks we give with humble
09:04:04 hearts.
09:04:04 Let us all say: Amen.
09:04:06 (Pledge of Allegiance)
09:04:22 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank you, Ms. Knowles, very much.
09:04:29 May we have roll call?
09:04:30 >>GWEN MILLER: Here.
09:04:34 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Here.
09:04:35 >>MARY MULHERN: Here.
09:04:37 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Here.
09:04:39 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Excuse me, I'm here.
09:04:40 You didn't pronounce my name clearly.
09:04:45 >>THOMAS SCOTT: She called your name but I don't
09:04:47 think you heard her.
09:04:48 Okay.
09:04:53 We will now take up review of the agenda for this
09:04:56 morning.
09:04:56 >> Good morning, Mr. Chairman, members of Tampa City
09:04:59 Council.

09:04:59 Before you, you have the addendum to the agenda.
09:05:05 You have several new business items that you will take
09:05:08 up at the end of the meeting that you received
09:05:12 information about.
09:05:15 You have items 81 and 92 on the staff reports.
09:05:22 I believe there's a request that those items be heard
09:05:24 together so when you take up item 81 that you also
09:05:27 take up item 92 after that.
09:05:31 Item 91, council, is a vote that's been brought
09:05:37 forward because there were insufficient number of
09:05:39 votes to move the item at the last commission meeting
09:05:42 and it's being brought with a closed public hearing
09:05:46 for your vote.
09:05:47 My understanding is, Mr. Chairman, that you may have
09:05:50 to leave before the lunch recess.
09:05:52 So it's been suggested that in order to have a full
09:05:55 council present that you do take up that vote at the
09:05:57 start of staff reports at 10:30.
09:06:01 You have a substitution from the resolution approving
09:06:06 a settlement agreement with Clear Channel outdoor,
09:06:09 item number 87.
09:06:11 You have a memorandum from assistant city attorney

09:06:14 Julia Cole requesting that substitute.
09:06:16 Item 89 you have a substitute ordinance per request of
09:06:20 Rebecca Kert, legal department, for the news racks,
09:06:24 item 89.
09:06:25 And a also you have a request from Chip Fletcher that
09:06:32 item 84 be handled as a written report rather than
09:06:37 in-person appearance.
09:06:39 That you receive and file that written report.
09:06:43 Finally, council, I understand for informational
09:06:46 purposes at 1:30 for those people who are interested,
09:06:50 the appeal hearing on the petition of Eric Schiller,
09:06:55 that cannot be heard.
09:06:56 Item 96, because that record was not perfected by the
09:07:00 appellant.
09:07:01 So for future, anybody intending to hear that appeal,
09:07:06 it cannot be heard today.
09:07:07 My understanding is those are all the changes.
09:07:11 I am not aware of any others.
09:07:13 And I ask of that council approve the agenda as
09:07:16 amended.
09:07:16 >> Any other items?
09:07:18 Okay.

09:07:19 Motion to approve the agenda?
09:07:23 >> So moved.
09:07:23 >> Second.
09:07:24 >> Okay.
09:07:25 Mrs. Saul-Sena.
09:07:25 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Just for clarification, it says
09:07:29 that at 11:00 we'll have a 30-minute presentation on
09:07:34 transportation.
09:07:34 Then at 2:00 we will also have a presentation on
09:07:37 transportation?
09:07:39 >> No.
09:07:41 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Or was that shifted?
09:07:43 >>THOMAS SCOTT: No.
09:07:43 That's a new business item here.
09:07:45 If you recall, it actually is following up with a
09:07:47 recommendation that we made by September, I think it
09:07:51 was, to have the executive summary and presentation
09:07:55 from the board of county commission, which I serve on
09:07:58 the task force, presented and a resolution to support
09:08:01 the language or placing the issue on the ballot for
09:08:04 the November 2010 for the one-cent sales tax.
09:08:08 So in essence what I am requesting here is that item

09:08:12 19 we have that presentation.
09:08:13 And then follow up with the resolution.
09:08:15 >> And that is different from the presentation of the
09:08:18 special discussion meeting today.
09:08:21 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you.
09:08:22 >>MARY MULHERN: Do we know that we'll actually have
09:08:27 the language to approve by then?
09:08:29 Do they have a deadline?
09:08:32 >> It's coming back to them December 2nd.
09:08:34 The idea is to just go ahead and pass a resolution a
09:08:36 adopting approving and placing the language on the
09:08:39 ballot.
09:08:39 >>MARY MULHERN: I'm just wondering if we'll know what
09:08:42 the language is.
09:08:46 We could say something on the ballot.
09:08:48 >> That's why it's coming back.
09:08:52 >>MARY MULHERN: We can discuss it then.
09:08:55 Thank you.
09:08:56 >> Anything else?
09:08:57 Okay.
09:08:57 If not, we'll have public comment at this time.
09:09:01 We have set aside 30 minutes for public comment.

09:09:04 You have three minutes to state your name, address for
09:09:06 the record.
09:09:07 And we give preference first to those items that are
09:09:10 on the agenda.
09:09:11 So if you are here, you want to speak to an item on
09:09:15 the agenda, you may come now and speak.
09:09:18 You may start forming a line along the wall.
09:09:22 Yes.
09:09:23 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Mr. Chairman, there are things on
09:09:26 the agenda today that appear under staff reports that
09:09:29 are set for first reading consideration.
09:09:32 Those are not set for public hearing.
09:09:34 If those do move forward, at first reading, they will
09:09:37 come back in two weeks for second reading and public
09:09:39 hearing.
09:09:40 If you wish to speak to those items today that are set
09:09:43 for first reading, your opportunity is now in agendaed
09:09:46 public comment.
09:09:47 This would be the time that would you speak.
09:09:49 Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
09:09:49 >> Thank you.
09:09:51 Yes, sir.

09:09:51 >>> My name is Philip Dinkins, 2621 south Brian
09:09:56 circle, I'm the chairman of the City of Tampa human
09:09:58 rights board.
09:09:59 The issue of the need to include gender identity in
09:10:02 the City of Tampa human rights ordinance first came to
09:10:05 the Tampa human rights board's attention over a year
09:10:08 ago.
09:10:08 The board has held special workshops in various board
09:10:12 meetings.
09:10:12 We met with citizens of the community to learn of
09:10:14 their experiences.
09:10:16 The results demonstrated that a need exists in our
09:10:19 city for legal protection for transgendered
09:10:22 individuals from discrimination and the board voted
09:10:24 unanimously to recommend that council consider this.
09:10:27 When I last appeared before you on October 1st,
09:10:30 council member Miranda, you asked me whether or not
09:10:32 the City of Tampa human rights office had received any
09:10:37 complaints of discrimination based upon gender
09:10:39 identity.
09:10:40 I have replied at that meeting that I was not aware of
09:10:43 any.

09:10:44 And mentioned that that was probably not unusual since
09:10:46 this was not a covered protected class in our
09:10:49 ordinance.
09:10:50 However, since then I have learned that there have
09:10:55 been eleven complaints filed with the City of Tampa
09:10:58 human rights office, and we believe this is an
09:11:02 extraordinary number considering this isn't even a
09:11:04 protected class.
09:11:07 Obviously no action could be taken.
09:11:08 But we feel that this is an underreporting of actual
09:11:12 likely number of discrimination issues in our
09:11:14 community based upon gender identity.
09:11:17 In the last decade, including gender identity has
09:11:20 become standard practice in human rights laws.
09:11:23 As I mentioned last time I was here, there's 13 states
09:11:26 plus Washington, D.C., and 17 municipalities in
09:11:29 Florida that have included gender identity in their
09:11:32 ordinances.
09:11:33 The latest Florida city was Tallahassee, just last
09:11:36 month.
09:11:37 In their decision, Tallahassee stated that gender
09:11:40 identity inclusion is Kintz with legislation currently

09:11:43 passed and currently under consideration at the
09:11:46 federal level.
09:11:48 The references tots Matthew Shepherd James Byrd hate
09:11:52 crimes prevention acted that was signed into federal
09:11:54 law on October 28th.
09:11:56 And also the pending employment nondiscrimination act
09:12:00 or ENDA which is currently under review by Congress,
09:12:03 both of which include gender identity.
09:12:06 According to the American psychiatric association,
09:12:08 gender identity is a severe psychological disorder.
09:12:12 According to recent California-based study, one in two
09:12:17 transgendered participants have experienced employment
09:12:20 discrimination.
09:12:21 According to the 2007 study by the gay lesbians
09:12:25 straight alliance known as GLSEN, nine out of ten
09:12:30 transgendered students in our schools experience
09:12:32 verbal harassment and more than half experience
09:12:36 physical harassment.
09:12:37 On behalf of the Tampa human rights board I
09:12:40 respectfully ask suggest you take this step to make
09:12:43 sure that all citizens are afforded protection from
09:12:45 discrimination and help our city's continuous

09:12:48 reputation as a welcoming and all inclusive place to
09:12:51 live and work.
09:12:52 Thank you.
09:12:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'm not too much knowledgeable
09:13:02 about gender so forth and so on, but let me ask you
09:13:06 this.
09:13:09 I can only say this.
09:13:13 I or no one that I know of on this board has ever been
09:13:16 in any way, form, shape or otherwise discriminatory to
09:13:20 anyone, race, color, gender, creed, purple, dotted,
09:13:26 whatever.
09:13:29 I'm looking at this, and I'm somewhat perplexed by the
09:13:34 understanding.
09:13:36 And maybe I have it wrong.
09:13:38 Is it today that I'm sitting next to Albert and
09:13:43 tomorrow I'm sitting next to Alice in a workplace?
09:13:46 Is that what we are talking about?
09:13:48 >>> Well, councilman Miranda, gender expression is how
09:13:51 an individual manifests themselves.
09:13:54 We are born biologically as male or female in most of
09:13:57 the cases that fits.
09:13:59 But as the American psychological association has

09:14:02 indicated, there are individuals -- and the numbers
09:14:06 can be as high as one tenth of one percent of our
09:14:10 population experience some type of identity gender
09:14:14 disorder.
09:14:16 They feel that they are not the person biologically
09:14:18 that they are.
09:14:19 Many people, since it's not a protected situation,
09:14:22 many people just live with that, and they live a very
09:14:27 tough life not being the person they are.
09:14:28 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: You never answered the question.
09:14:34 You should be a great politician.
09:14:36 I asked the question, does that mean in an office
09:14:39 setting, today I'm sitting next to Ellen and tomorrow
09:14:45 I'm sitting next to Tom?
09:14:48 Is that possible?
09:14:49 >>> If that individual has the financial resources and
09:14:52 the family support and the peer support and the
09:14:57 support of their workers to go through a sex change --
09:14:59 >> I'm not talking about a sex change.
09:15:01 >>> Okay.
09:15:02 >> I'm talking about garment ware that you have today
09:15:08 as one person because you talk about psychological

09:15:11 effects and this, that and the other.
09:15:12 I'm thinking about the overall workplace, not only of
09:15:15 this city, but everywhere.
09:15:17 And does that create some type of a disruptive
09:15:23 atmosphere in whatever business you're in or
09:15:25 government you're in, that today you are sitting next
09:15:28 to someone and the next day it's someone else and it's
09:15:30 the same person?
09:15:32 >>> Well, now, that's the very reason we need this law
09:15:34 to protect these individuals.
09:15:35 If they chose to come to work dressed differently
09:15:37 because that's who they felt they were, whether they
09:15:40 went through sexual reassignment surgery or not, they
09:15:43 should have the right to do that.
09:15:44 Why should I have to wear a suit and tie to have go to
09:15:47 my workplace?
09:15:52 >> We'll be debating this.
09:15:53 >> I got the answer.
09:15:54 >> Thank you very much.
09:15:56 Next speaker.
09:15:56 >>> Good morning.
09:16:02 I'm Wofford Johnson, 465 Longfellow Avenue, president

09:16:07 of T.H.A.N.
09:16:09 I'm here to speak on items 87, 88 on your agenda.
09:16:13 These were on your agenda a couple of weeks ago, and
09:16:19 you wisely continued or postponed it until today to
09:16:22 give the various parties an opportunity to get
09:16:24 together and discuss the issues and see what could be
09:16:29 worked out.
09:16:31 As was stated to you at that time, T.H.A.N. has
09:16:33 serious considerations about a number of issues within
09:16:36 that agreement.
09:16:38 Julia Cole has scheduled an information last week, for
09:16:43 various people who have an interest and stake in this
09:16:48 issue did meet, did discuss.
09:16:50 We as neighborhoods had an opportunity to express our
09:16:55 concerns from the standpoint of properly protecting
09:16:57 neighborhoods from billboard requirements.
09:17:05 While we as neighbors and a association recognize that
09:17:10 our -- in a perfect world we wouldn't have billboards,
09:17:15 but we know this is not perfect.
09:17:17 We know there are state laws and former agreements
09:17:21 that the city has that would prevent that.
09:17:22 So our position is that we wanted to maximize what we

09:17:27 could from the standpoint of properly protecting
09:17:31 neighborhoods.
09:17:32 And we met with them.
09:17:33 We discussed this, these issues with them.
09:17:37 They agreed to certain conditions and so forth that we
09:17:40 had concerns about, and they have been amended.
09:17:44 So I'm here to say from the standpoint of T.H.A.N., we
09:17:48 do not object to items 87 and 88, the amended
09:17:54 agreements.
09:17:56 I just want to be on record on that.
09:17:57 >> Thank you, sir.
09:17:59 Next speaker.
09:17:59 >>> My name is Todd Pressman, U.S. 19 north,
09:18:08 Clearwater, Florida.
09:18:09 I'm here in regard to item 87, 88, representing Clear
09:18:14 Channel communications.
09:18:16 As a former city mayor once said, you can pave the
09:18:20 streets in gold and there would still be complaints
09:18:23 about glare.
09:18:25 In regard to Mr. Johnson, I think that we can tell you
09:18:27 today that we have addressed the glare problem, we
09:18:30 believe, with sunglasses.

09:18:32 I do want to thank Chip and Julia.
09:18:36 They have, under their supervision, been able to have
09:18:40 even further discussions and been able to address
09:18:43 concerns and issues.
09:18:44 And Clear Channel, I think everyone knows Clear
09:18:46 Channel is a good corporate citizen.
09:18:48 They are always happy to sit down again and talk again
09:18:51 and meets again and talk again, modify positions,
09:18:55 talk, understand positions, and address those issues,
09:18:59 which has been done today.
09:19:02 I would like to make one reminder.
09:19:06 There has been some discussion over the last few weeks
09:19:08 about why issues have been split, why there's two
09:19:11 separate agreements, and I just want to remind
09:19:14 council, I believe as you know that was a direction we
09:19:16 received from council, we thought that was a good
09:19:18 direction, so that's the process that everyone chose
09:19:20 to move forward with.
09:19:21 And with that, we are asking great liberty and respect
09:19:26 that you consider strongly the passage of the
09:19:29 settlement agreement today, and we appreciate your
09:19:30 time and patience.

09:19:31 Thank you.
09:19:32 >> Thank you very much.
09:19:34 Next speaker.
09:19:34 >>> My name is Lewis VERUM, Sterling manor drive,
09:19:43 Tampa, Florida, here to speak on an agenda item
09:19:45 regarding the perspective ban on alcohol sales during
09:19:49 Gasparilla by private charities.
09:19:51 I'm here as a proud board member of HARC, an
09:19:55 organization which provides assistance to persons with
09:19:57 developmental disabilities here in this county.
09:19:59 I'm here to respectfully oppose this proposal.
09:20:03 Obviously I don't think anybody can contest the idea
09:20:05 of trying to make Gasparilla more family friendly.
09:20:09 As a father of a three-year-old boy obviously I
09:20:11 support that.
09:20:11 I think we can all support that.
09:20:13 However, I would respectfully state that this proposal
09:20:15 is wrong specifically for three reasons.
09:20:17 Reason number one would be that it would have
09:20:20 unintended consequences.
09:20:22 Obviously, by going after a fund-raising charities,
09:20:26 particularly in this present economy, when charities

09:20:28 are getting less funds because folks have less money
09:20:31 to give, would be very misguided, particularly with
09:20:35 HARC dealing with people who are developmentally
09:20:37 disabled, we will be dealing with people who are
09:20:39 already hard pressed.
09:20:41 People in fact like my oldest brother Juan Viera who
09:20:47 is developmentally disabled.
09:20:49 People like Juan need assistance and cannot have
09:20:51 further, in effect, cuts.
09:20:53 Secondly, this proposal is wrong because of the fact
09:20:55 that it is overbroad.
09:20:57 There are more reasonable ways to make Gasparilla a
09:21:00 more family friendly event rather than seeking to
09:21:04 curtail a fund-raising abilities by charities that are
09:21:09 in dire need.
09:21:10 For example, I understand the city is taking a look at
09:21:13 hiring more police officers.
09:21:15 I think that's a very good reasonable suggestion.
09:21:17 Lastly, I believe this proposal is misguided because
09:21:20 of the fact that you would be effectively undermining
09:21:23 a partner in civility and in family-friendly culture,
09:21:27 if you will, in Gasparilla.

09:21:29 Take a look at HARC, for example.
09:21:31 Twice in the past I have been a volunteer in the HARC
09:21:36 charity when it comes to with the sale of alcohol at
09:21:38 Gasparilla.
09:21:39 We have approximately 30 volunteers out there who are
09:21:42 well trained to make sure that underage youth do not
09:21:46 get their hands on alcohol.
09:21:47 And in fact at the expense, at HARC's expense we go
09:21:51 out and hire security personnel who assist us in that
09:21:54 regard.
09:21:54 Therefore, by undermining our ability to fund raise at
09:21:58 Gasparilla, not only would you be undermining
09:22:00 effectively an organization which makes Tampa a better
09:22:03 city to live in than some of our most vulnerable
09:22:06 citizens, but I believe would you also be undermining
09:22:09 an organization that helps Gasparilla be a more family
09:22:13 friendly event.
09:22:14 In fact, I would wager to say if this proposal were to
09:22:17 pass, underage drinking, public lewdness, et cetera,
09:22:20 would not be lowered whatsoever in Gasparilla.
09:22:23 In fact, by cutting folks like HARC out that I believe
09:22:26 make Gasparilla a more family-friendly event, I

09:22:29 believe you would see an increase in this kind of
09:22:32 inappropriate behavior.
09:22:33 Therefore, in summary, this proposal however well
09:22:37 meaning it is effectively hurts people who can't
09:22:40 afford to be hurt and pushes people and organizations
09:22:43 already too close to the edge.
09:22:44 Thank you.
09:22:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Sir, I want to respond a little
09:22:50 bit because I think there's a lot of confusion on this
09:22:52 issue.
09:22:53 For one thing, I volunteered with HARC over in Hyde
09:22:57 Park Village, and I think you guys do great work.
09:23:00 Number two, there's no proposal, okay.
09:23:02 There was a discussion at our last meeting about the
09:23:06 beer gardens.
09:23:08 On further review, our legal counsel and zoning
09:23:11 department reminded us that those permits are now
09:23:15 not -- through the mayor's office so City Council has
09:23:19 no authority whatsoever on those particular temporary
09:23:22 wet zoning permits on the public right-of-way.
09:23:24 So there's nothing pending to impact the nonprofits
09:23:29 and the charities on the beer gardens except for the

09:23:35 mayor's.
09:23:36 Apparently what I find in the newspaper she's fine
09:23:38 with the beer garden so it sounds like you have no
09:23:41 problem.
09:23:41 >>> Thank you.
09:23:42 >> Well, one clarification, there's a letter on our
09:23:45 agenda today --
09:23:47 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: That's a different issue.
09:23:48 That's about asking grocery stores whether or not --
09:23:51 This is the same issue, I think. Anyway, we'll take
09:23:54 that up at that time.
09:23:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: It's a related issue, but I want
09:23:58 to clarify that the I shall but the beer gardens, how
09:24:01 they affect the nonprofits, is not the issue that we
09:24:04 will be dealing with a little while later about the
09:24:06 sale from the grocery stores.
09:24:08 >> Okay.
09:24:10 Thank you.
09:24:10 >>MARY MULHERN: I wanted to ask if perhaps we could
09:24:14 hear from one of the attorneys, perhaps Mr. Shelby
09:24:17 would clarify this, because there are probably people
09:24:20 here who may not be here when we get to that point.

09:24:23 It's a question.
09:24:24 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Well, Mr. Dingfelder's recollection
09:24:36 accurately reflects my own.
09:24:38 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay, thanks.
09:24:41 >>JULIA COLE: Rebecca Kert is the attorney who deals
09:24:41 with the alcoholic beverage issues.
09:24:47 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Next speaker.
09:24:50 Next speaker.
09:24:51 Next speaker.
09:24:52 We'll be here all day.
09:24:53 Next speaker.
09:24:53 >>> Good morning.
09:24:56 My name is Steve Roberto, DUTON circle.
09:25:02 I also happen to be the special events director for
09:25:05 HARC.
09:25:06 Thank you for the clarification.
09:25:08 I just wanted to thank the City Council and the City
09:25:10 of Tampa.
09:25:12 We have been fortunate enough to be one of the
09:25:14 charities for a number of years.
09:25:17 This is a fund-raiser to have the responsibly run beer
09:25:20 garden during Gasparilla pirate fest, as Mr. VIERA

09:25:25 mentioned, we have 30 trained volunteers under my
09:25:28 guidance.
09:25:28 I also wanted to confirm that we do hire at our
09:25:31 expense three extra duty officers to provide security
09:25:35 and backup at our beer garden to avoid any unruly
09:25:40 behavior of each potential purchaser of a product, to
09:25:45 have their ID checked, and with regards to whether
09:25:49 they are buying one or two beverages, if you will.
09:25:52 We have run it a number of years without a problem.
09:25:55 HARC provides a variety of services to adults with
09:25:58 developmental disabilities throughout Hillsborough
09:26:00 County.
09:26:00 We now perform for these vulnerable adults at a time
09:26:06 when the economy and the state deficit, when HARC
09:26:10 charity and other 501(c)3s, the funds, 100 percent
09:26:17 of the net proceeds that we raise that day go to the
09:26:22 31 that we operate Monday through Friday providing
09:26:25 services to people that otherwise wouldn't be able to
09:26:29 benefit from our services.
09:26:30 I'm sure we can all relate to how much gas and
09:26:33 insurance has gone up over the years.
09:26:34 So every chance we get to raise hundreds of dollars or

09:26:37 more is vital money to HARC to continue to serve these
09:26:42 very vulnerable folks.
09:26:43 Thank you for your attention.
09:26:44 Have a great day.
09:26:45 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Thank you.
09:26:46 Next speaker.
09:26:49 >>> My name is Kathy Acheveria.
09:26:57 Good morning.
09:26:58 I'm here to speak on the beer garden issue as well.
09:27:02 I'm a member of the Tampa garden club.
09:27:05 We actually are on the parade route.
09:27:09 And having this beer garden helps us have our
09:27:13 building, which is home to many horticultural
09:27:18 societies.
09:27:19 We have educational meetings.
09:27:22 Bayshore Gardens meets there.
09:27:24 We give a summer camp for kids in the summer.
09:27:26 We support a nature camp in Apopka that the state
09:27:31 organization operates.
09:27:34 And I'm very relieved to hear a this we are not
09:27:38 threatened.
09:27:40 And thank you very much.

09:27:41 And hopefully we will be able to keep a presence
09:27:44 there, because at our place, it is a family
09:27:48 atmosphere.
09:27:48 We have a large piece of ground, families come there,
09:27:51 we get a dee-jay, the kids are lined up and across the
09:27:55 grass and everything.
09:27:56 So it's been a very good thing for us and we
09:27:59 appreciate the opportunity at this time.
09:28:01 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Thank you.
09:28:04 Next speaker.
09:28:04 >>> Good morning, Mr. Chairman, members of the board,
09:28:16 City Council.
09:28:17 My name is Manny Alvarez.
09:28:19 I'm with BB&T bank.
09:28:22 By the last name you might recognize that one of your
09:28:25 colleagues is my wife.
09:28:28 She sat up there for eight years.
09:28:31 I'm here on behalf of the City of Tampa human rights
09:28:35 board.
09:28:36 I'm a member and been a member for quite a few years.
09:28:39 And I have a recommendation, the amending of the City
09:28:45 of Tampa human rights ordinance is something that we

09:28:50 need.
09:28:51 Tampa has the reputation of being a city of -- great
09:28:58 city in America.
09:28:59 We have got to keep that up.
09:29:00 We also by doing this, adopting this amendment, we
09:29:05 would attract the corporations that are hesitant to
09:29:10 come to Tampa with their facilities.
09:29:14 We also have knowledge that Honeywell has adopted it
09:29:20 in their amendments.
09:29:24 The other ones are Raymond James.
09:29:30 I hear that the Hillsborough County lawyers are
09:29:33 working it into their amendments.
09:29:36 And it's something that's very important.
09:29:41 For years, discrimination of any form has been very
09:29:45 prevalent.
09:29:46 I, as a young Hispanic, years ago, we were Latinos, we
09:29:52 weren't Hispanics.
09:29:54 But I was discriminated against.
09:29:56 We really didn't make an issue of it.
09:30:00 We were forbidden of speaking Spanish in school, which
09:30:03 was our language.
09:30:06 We were kept from a lot of activities that we would

09:30:10 have liked to have been part of.
09:30:13 But because of discrimination, it was not available.
09:30:17 The worst was in Sulphur Springs, years ago in the hot
09:30:21 summer, the swimming pool was certainly an attractive
09:30:24 thing for all of us.
09:30:26 We never had a pool, and we felt that that would be
09:30:28 our pool.
09:30:30 There was a big sign put up.
09:30:33 And I must say that I don't remember the exact words,
09:30:36 but I remember the subject.
09:30:39 It said no Latins or dogs.
09:30:43 And I'm sure a lot of you on the committee being of
09:30:49 the age group that has suffered through
09:30:52 discrimination, it's very important that we do adopt
09:30:55 this.
09:30:56 We are an up-and-coming city.
09:30:59 And I would hope that the City Council saw it in their
09:31:03 purview that we do amend the bylaw.
09:31:06 Thank you very much.
09:31:06 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Thank you.
09:31:10 Next speaker.
09:31:10 >> I'm Glen Shull, 4826 West San Jose in Tampa,

09:31:21 Florida.
09:31:21 I'm here representing the tennis pros who teach in the
09:31:24 City of Tampa.
09:31:29 We develop and conduct programs in tennis, on the city
09:31:32 parks.
09:31:33 As a result of that we give the city 20% of all that
09:31:35 we make so the city is making $20,000 some a year at
09:31:39 no cost to them.
09:31:40 We conduct the programs, come as you will, pay when
09:31:44 you play, and at the end of the month we provide 20%.
09:31:48 Our attendance logs for the month to the city.
09:31:52 All they have to do is deposit those four or five
09:31:54 check that is we send to them.
09:31:55 The city now is planning on implementing in January a
09:31:59 program where our customers have to go to a recreation
09:32:03 center, Joe Abrahams or Davis Island, et cetera, to
09:32:07 register, sign up for specific courses.
09:32:09 If they don't attend a session, because of a change in
09:32:12 their schedule, they forfeit those funds.
09:32:15 If they are not on my roster that the city will supply
09:32:18 to me, I have to tell them, you cannot play, and take
09:32:22 a lesson with me, and as a result of that, we feel we

09:32:25 are going to lose a lot of our customers.
09:32:28 I have already -- some of our customers, are
09:32:32 scholarship.
09:32:33 If someone loses their job and say I am not going to
09:32:35 be able to send my job, I lost my job, I said, you
09:32:39 send them, I'll scholarship them and you can resume
09:32:41 paying me.
09:32:42 And the city might have a problem with that. Anyway,
09:32:45 the tennis pros pay also just for collecting the
09:32:49 money, we get our money right away.
09:32:51 As a result of the new proposal, they are proposing a
09:32:54 series of courses for six to eight weeks.
09:32:57 We run this program year round.
09:32:58 We are not offering a class for six weeks.
09:33:01 We run it year round.
09:33:02 And they are saying that after your six or eight
09:33:05 weeks, then the city collects all the evaluation
09:33:08 forms, and all the attendance sheets, and then within
09:33:11 30 days they'll pay the pros. So basically we'll be
09:33:14 waiting for two and a half to three months from the
09:33:16 time the program starts to the time it ends.
09:33:18 Also, my customers say, I don't wants to fill out an

09:33:21 evaluation form on you every six to eight weeks.
09:33:24 The pros like the program the way it is.
09:33:25 The customers like the program the way it is.
09:33:27 And here is the suggestion.
09:33:30 Mr. Shelby, I give him a handout so you can look this
09:33:33 over for next month hopefully.
09:33:35 They like the flexibility of the program that we have.
09:33:37 There's no forfeiture of funds.
09:33:39 And in these economic times we don't want to be asking
09:33:42 our citizens who are taking exercise program to
09:33:45 forfeit funds.
09:33:47 If it was two percent and everything is gung ho they
09:33:52 might be willing to do that.
09:33:53 Right now they are not.
09:33:55 A lot of drop-ins.
09:33:57 Mr. Dingfelder says, hey, at 6:00, conducting a
09:34:00 program, he can come right by, put his ten bucks in my
09:34:05 brief case, come on out and play.
09:34:06 A lot of drop-ins.
09:34:08 A lot of spontaneous response at customer request.
09:34:12 If someone says, Glen, I see you finished a program,
09:34:15 can you teach me a private lesson now?

09:34:17 The city is saying, no, you can't do that.
09:34:19 You have to send them over to Joe Abrahams.
09:34:21 They have we have to send you a roster and then they
09:34:24 can take the lesson.
09:34:25 Also, allow us to accept the fees.
09:34:29 We will recommend that they go over to the recreation
09:34:32 center and sign up and pay ahead of time.
09:34:35 We don't like the idea they have to forfeit funds.
09:34:37 And then we would suggest that Karen Palus or Cathy
09:34:42 Shauntz, who is instituting this program, if they can
09:34:46 include those six items I mentioned at the end and ask
09:34:48 why they are changing.
09:34:49 We have a system that works well.
09:34:51 Why change it?
09:34:52 What questions do you have?
09:34:53 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Ms. Mulhern was first.
09:34:57 >>MARY MULHERN: I just wanted to ask.
09:35:00 I notice there are a couple of -- yesterday, there
09:35:02 were some items on the agenda for us to approve for
09:35:05 some automated parks.
09:35:08 I would like to have those pulled off the consent
09:35:10 agenda for discussion today.

09:35:15 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Second.
09:35:16 >>MARY MULHERN: Since this is an issue and this is
09:35:19 not the only individual we have heard from on this.
09:35:21 >> Which items?
09:35:26 >> 15 and 16.
09:35:27 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I was going to add that there were
09:35:30 items that were -- and you did give those items number
09:35:35 15 and 16 that are related, I believe.
09:35:38 Those items related to the procurement, acceptance of
09:35:42 a proposal for the automated system that appears to be
09:35:46 referenced bits speaker.
09:35:48 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Well, I inquired with Karen
09:35:51 because we all were receiving these e-mails.
09:35:53 I know Mr. Shull as well.
09:35:56 And apparently, in doing the research, about a month
09:36:01 ago, October 1st, 2009, on the consent agenda,
09:36:05 there was a resolution that we approved without any
09:36:08 discussion at all, without any explanation from the
09:36:10 Parks Department about it's a new agreement, entering
09:36:15 into contracts with independent contractors for
09:36:18 persons using parks and recs facilities.
09:36:20 It doesn't mention tennis facilities or anything like

09:36:22 that.
09:36:23 It's sort of a generic agreement with people that are
09:36:25 using -- like Mr. Shull and his counterparts who are
09:36:29 independent contractors.
09:36:30 We approved this.
09:36:31 I don't think any of us knew that this applied to this
09:36:36 situation.
09:36:37 If I had known I definitely would have pulled it off
09:36:39 the agenda.
09:36:40 I'm a little disappointed in parks and rec that they
09:36:42 didn't come and consult us and say this is the impact
09:36:45 and this is what's going on, and this is
09:36:47 controversial.
09:36:48 So, anyway, I would like in 30 days, I would like
09:36:52 Karen Palus to come and talk to us.
09:36:56 >> Hold it till we take up item 15 and 16.
09:37:00 We'll hold that, okay?
09:37:01 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'm sorry, Mr. Chairman, I believe
09:37:04 there was a motion and second on that.
09:37:05 >> Well, I would rather take it up after we get
09:37:09 through with the public.
09:37:10 Let's deal with the public, get through it then.

09:37:12 Thank you.
09:37:13 >>> My name is Ethel Hammer.
09:37:18 My address is 4343 ECHOL parkway plaza, 33634.
09:37:26 I'm here this morning to talk about agenda items 87
09:37:29 and 88.
09:37:30 At the outset I want to make it clear that I am not
09:37:33 necessarily here to speak in opposition to the
09:37:35 settlement agreement, but I am asking you to proceed
09:37:38 cautiously with what I am going to call the
09:37:40 implementing tool of this settlement agreement, and
09:37:43 that is the pending digital billboard ordinance.
09:37:47 I am not going to speak to the merits of that
09:37:49 ordinance.
09:37:50 It is not appropriate at this time.
09:37:52 But what I am going to ask is that because of the way
09:37:56 that these two items are intricately intertwined with
09:38:04 each other that you proceed slowly, and that you
09:38:07 afford the public a greater opportunity to have input
09:38:10 to that ordinance.
09:38:12 And I'm asking that if at all possible you set up a
09:38:17 sign committee like you did approximately a year or so
09:38:21 ago when we worked on very diligently -- there were

09:38:25 many interested citizens involved -- on the on-site
09:38:29 sign ordinance amendments.
09:38:30 And by the time that ordinance came to you, there was
09:38:33 very little opposition, because we had worked together
09:38:36 for months on end.
09:38:37 I think this would give an opportunity for
09:38:40 neighborhood representatives, for professionals, for
09:38:44 citizens, to sign officials, for anyone interested,
09:38:51 similar composition of last time, to actually come
09:38:53 together and work through this proposed ordinance,
09:38:55 which I think is the appropriate process.
09:38:57 Right now, what we have is a workshop set-up.
09:39:01 In my opinion that is not going to be a sufficient
09:39:04 venue for everybody to really get their issues
09:39:07 resolved and on the table.
09:39:09 So we would appreciate very much -- I'll be the first
09:39:12 person to volunteer.
09:39:13 And so we ask that you set up that committee so that
09:39:17 we all have a chance to provide input.
09:39:19 Thank you.
09:39:19 >> Thank you very much.
09:39:21 Next speaker.

09:39:22 >> My name is Brenda RIO, North Armenia Avenue, Tampa.
09:39:30 I'm here today as the Executive Director of the
09:39:33 alliance Center for Independent Living.
09:39:35 We are one of the charities that's been selected the
09:39:37 last two years for a beer garden at Gasparilla.
09:39:40 And we do consider it a privilege.
09:39:43 And because of that privilege we make sure that all of
09:39:45 our volunteers are trained.
09:39:47 We card everyone.
09:39:50 We have Port-o-Lets that are right there for the
09:39:52 customers to use.
09:39:54 We take it very seriously.
09:39:56 We are an agency that serves any person in
09:40:00 Hillsborough County with a disability.
09:40:02 Any disability.
09:40:03 We buy wheelchairs for children.
09:40:05 We repair wheelchairs for people.
09:40:10 When our funding has been cut on a federal, state and
09:40:14 a local level.
09:40:15 So we use the money that we make at Gasparilla to
09:40:17 offset those losses and to fill in the gaps.
09:40:21 And I won't reiterate what everyone else said but it's

09:40:25 critical to our organization.
09:40:27 It's good for our community.
09:40:28 And our tent, you will see people in wheelchairs.
09:40:31 You will see people who are deaf, blind, actually
09:40:33 selling beer that day helping us run the tent.
09:40:36 We work very closely with the pirate fest people to
09:40:40 make sure that are we follow all the rules and
09:40:42 regulations.
09:40:44 So I'm happy to hear that it's not going to be an
09:40:46 issue.
09:40:47 So thank you.
09:40:48 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Thank you.
09:40:50 Next speaker.
09:40:51 >>> My name is Frank Roder, address 908 east Louisiana
09:40:58 Avenue in Tampa.
09:40:59 For the last nine years I have been a proud member of
09:41:01 Tampa human rights board and currently serve as
09:41:04 co-chair of the board.
09:41:05 I'm here to speak in favor of our new proposed
09:41:08 expanded ordinance to include gender identity and
09:41:10 expression.
09:41:12 This last week, the bill was signed into law by

09:41:16 President Obama to cover sexual gender and identity
09:41:19 expression.
09:41:20 Recently Miami-Dade college expanded its policies to
09:41:23 include sexual orientation and gender identity
09:41:26 expression.
09:41:26 That is the largest institution of higher education in
09:41:29 America with 167,000 students and 8,000 faculty
09:41:32 members.
09:41:33 Tallahassee's latest city in Florida to add gender
09:41:36 identity and expression to its human rights ordinance.
09:41:42 They joined 17 other municipalities in the State of
09:41:44 Florida to now have gender identity and expression
09:41:46 added to it.
09:41:48 13 states have added gender identity and expression to
09:41:51 their human rights ordinances.
09:41:53 Many ask why this change is needed.
09:41:55 Just look across the bay to what happened in the city
09:41:57 of Largo two years ago with their city manager.
09:42:00 Discrimination in any form is just plain wrong.
09:42:03 In 1991, when Tampa expanded its human rights
09:42:06 ordinance, Ms. Saul-Sena, you were on the board at
09:42:08 that time, to include sexual orientation and many

09:42:12 expressed outrage and warned of dire consequences if
09:42:16 that amendment had passed.
09:42:18 Those predictions never happened.
09:42:19 It is now time to add gender identity and expression
09:42:22 to our human rights ordinance.
09:42:23 It's the right thing to do.
09:42:25 Thank you, members of council.
09:42:26 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Next speaker.
09:42:27 >>> My name is Kate Melges. I live at 803 E. Norfolk
09:42:36 street in Tampa, and I'm a member of the environmental
09:42:38 community here in Tampa here today to ask you guys to
09:42:41 pass this resolution urging the U.S. Senate to act on
09:42:44 climate before the U.N. Copenhagen, in December.
09:42:49 This is an issue that many people in Tampa are very
09:42:51 concerned about, and two weekends ago I organized a
09:42:55 rally in South Tampa.
09:42:56 It was one of over 5,000 and over 180 countries as
09:43:01 part of an international day of action.
09:43:04 And I would hope that Tampa would step up to the plate
09:43:06 and urge our Senate to take action on this issue.
09:43:08 And I have copies of the resolution.
09:43:12 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Thank you very much.

09:43:16 Next speaker.
09:43:17 >>> My name is Nick KORUS. I work at 4350 West
09:43:29 Cypress street. I'm a senior business development
09:43:31 manager for Blue Cross Blue Shield, here to speak
09:43:34 about item 85.
09:43:35 I work out of our Tampa regional office in the
09:43:37 Westshore district as I mentioned.
09:43:39 Just a brief summary.
09:43:42 We are Florida based, tax paying mutual nonprofit
09:43:45 company based in Jacksonville.
09:43:47 We employ roughly 6,000 individuals statewide with 230
09:43:50 of our employees here, based here in Tampa.
09:43:54 The state's largest insurer with over 4 million
09:43:57 insured in our health, business and 7.7 million
09:44:00 customers served in all of our other lines of
09:44:02 business.
09:44:04 I'm proud to say that we implemented policies to
09:44:06 protect our employees from gender identity and
09:44:08 expression discrimination in the workplace two years
09:44:11 ago.
09:44:12 We believe that it makes good business sense.
09:44:14 But even beyond any business case that can be made we

09:44:17 felt it was and is simply the right thing to do.
09:44:21 Our CEO Dr. Bob Lufanna has consistently demonstrated
09:44:25 the kind of admirable leadership in word and deed that
09:44:29 has made it possible for our company to transform our
09:44:32 working environment into one that encourages all of
09:44:34 our employees to be fully present in the workplace.
09:44:37 We believe that this is good business practice.
09:44:40 We have observed an employee feels safe, respected and
09:44:44 valued, and his or her own merits and abilities
09:44:47 without the fear of discrimination is an empowered
09:44:50 employee.
09:44:51 And the empowered employee will demonstrate greater
09:44:55 degrees of innovation, perform better, and show
09:44:58 greater willingness to lead than an employee who may
09:45:01 be faced with the ongoing threats of workplace
09:45:03 discrimination.
09:45:04 In a highly competitive business environments it makes
09:45:07 good business sense to attract and retain the very
09:45:10 best employees.
09:45:11 This is why we consider a culture based on inclusion
09:45:15 and respect to be a competitive advantage.
09:45:17 Such a culture encourages our employees to stay and

09:45:19 perform at their very best.
09:45:22 Thank you, members of the council.
09:45:23 >> Thank you.
09:45:26 We have one last speaker after this lady.
09:45:29 That will conclude our public comments.
09:45:31 >>> I'm here to speak on the billboard settlement.
09:45:37 While I have no objection to it, I do have some
09:45:39 concerns.
09:45:41 I'm not speaking on the ordinance at all.
09:45:42 But I will volunteer for the committee.
09:45:46 In section 7, reconstruction, reconfiguration, 7-B-4,
09:45:56 in regard to relocation, apparently they can upsize in
09:46:00 the process of the relocation.
09:46:02 There is some language in there that as long as the
09:46:08 sign is relocated does not exceed 672 square feet, or
09:46:12 400 square feet where located, so they can basically
09:46:15 upsize in the process.
09:46:20 There's been other settlements throughout the country.
09:46:23 And I'm kind of surprised that this was not copy
09:46:26 catted from some of the other settlements regarding
09:46:29 enforcement.
09:46:30 If there is a breech in the agreement, basically you

09:46:32 go back to court, back to arbitration.
09:46:35 There are no penalties or fines.
09:46:39 St. Pete, for example, has a $200 a day sign fine for
09:46:43 violation.
09:46:45 I'm glad to see that the signs are not in perpetuity
09:46:52 as far as forever.
09:46:56 And section 5, I have a concern about.
09:46:59 I'm not too sure what that means in regard to without
09:47:03 limiting the program application to FDOT and the
09:47:07 right-of-way shall not be limited to the agreement, if
09:47:09 there is a conflict between our agreement and FDOT.
09:47:12 What does that mean as far as to us?
09:47:16 If we work out something that protects our neighbors,
09:47:19 but FDOT has something that's a little broader, it
09:47:22 doesn't give us as much protection, have we now lost
09:47:25 those rights?
09:47:29 And distance separation, has that been addressed?
09:47:34 If it's one for every mile, are we talking about one
09:47:37 for every mile on both sides?
09:47:39 And therefore we have double up?
09:47:47 There's a lot of signage along 275, if there's one
09:47:50 every mile, one on one side and one for every mile on

09:47:54 the other side.
09:47:55 Those are basically my concerns.
09:47:58 And thank you for y'all giving us time to look over
09:48:01 the agreement.
09:48:01 >> Could you state your name for the record?
09:48:05 >> I'm Ingrid Smith, 5605 north Suwannee Avenue,
09:48:10 Tampa.
09:48:11 >> Thank you very much.
09:48:12 Last speaker.
09:48:12 >>> Good morning, distinguished City Council members.
09:48:19 My name is Ryan Yacabachi, and I live at 8110 North
09:48:25 Tenth Street in historic Sulphur Springs.
09:48:28 And I'm here today in support of the resolution that
09:48:34 Kate Melges handed you all, and I just briefly want to
09:48:38 speak about a couple things.
09:48:42 I'm involved in a grassroots organizing in Sulphur
09:48:44 Springs and a recent graduate of USF, and kind of this
09:48:49 whole youth movement that's happening in Tampa and
09:48:51 around the nation.
09:48:52 And I was watching Bill Moyer this past weekend.
09:48:57 If you don't watch it, a great PBS show.
09:49:00 He had a gentleman on, James Galbraith, a brilliant

09:49:04 economist. His father John Galbraith wrote the 1929
09:49:10 Great Depression.
09:49:11 And just to put things in context and why Ms. Melges'
09:49:16 resolution is so important. He makes it very clear
09:49:19 that this recession that we are in is far from over,
09:49:22 and it's not going to be over for the next ten years.
09:49:25 And if we go about doing business as usual, these
09:49:29 problems will not be solved.
09:49:30 And one thing that he made clear, he says that we as a
09:49:35 country and we as a people really need to sit down and
09:49:38 ask ourselves where we want to be in 30 years.
09:49:40 And I don't mean to be rude, but most of you sitting
09:49:44 on this council in 30 years mites not be here.
09:49:50 So, you know, let's be realistic here.
09:49:53 [ Laughter ]
09:49:54 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Well, I plan to be around.
09:49:56 >>> I hope so.
09:50:00 But in all seriousness, my generation, these issues
09:50:10 are so important because decisions that are being made
09:50:12 now on these issues are going to affect us 30 years
09:50:17 down the road.
09:50:17 And I don't want to live in a world that is business

09:50:20 as usual as we have experienced now, inflating
09:50:23 bubbles, and sub preliminary lending and these types
09:50:27 of practices, dirty energy especially.
09:50:29 President Obama visited Arcadia as you are aware, and
09:50:33 one thing that he said about the solar panel factory
09:50:36 in Arcadia, green collar jobs cannot be outsourced.
09:50:40 These are jobs that stay in the U.S.
09:50:45 Therefore, as City Council members you all have power
09:50:48 in terms of lobbying the mayor's office, the green
09:50:51 officer Thom Snelling, has power in lobbying county
09:50:55 commission, working with grassroots organizations like
09:50:58 myself, and I have spoken with some and currently
09:51:01 working with.
09:51:02 But this is so important.
09:51:03 People in Sulphur Springs, they need jobs.
09:51:05 People all over Tampa need jobs.
09:51:08 The kinds of jobs is the question.
09:51:10 Honeywell and Jabil circuit and these big corporation
09:51:14 that is come in, and drape theory just came to USF,
09:51:17 they are great.
09:51:18 They are not the kinds of jobs that my neighbors can
09:51:20 work at.

09:51:21 They aren't the kind of jobs that put people back to
09:51:24 work and really stimulate the economy.
09:51:27 We need to work together to solve these problems, and
09:51:30 figure out the kinds of jobs like the solar panel
09:51:33 factory in Arcadia, and jobs that are in bill's book
09:51:37 deep economy which I totally recommend to all of you.
09:51:40 I believe it's on Councilwoman's Mulherns', in her
09:51:44 office.
09:51:45 And says finding jobs conducive to the community that
09:51:47 are cost effective, now, low capital investment jobs,
09:51:52 but create a good community.
09:51:53 So thank you.
09:51:54 >> Thank you very much, sir.
09:51:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'm sort of depressed now, but
09:51:59 thanks.
09:51:59 [ Laughter ]
09:52:00 >>THOMAS SCOTT: We would at this time need to -- I
09:52:06 have a request to be pulled item 15 and 16 by
09:52:10 Councilwoman Mulhern, a motion and second.
09:52:12 All in favor of that signify by saying Aye.
09:52:14 Opposes?
09:52:19 All right.

09:52:19 Is there anyone here that wishes to request a
09:52:22 reconsideration on any legislative issue or matter?
09:52:32 Okay.
09:52:35 We move to ordinances for first reading consideration.
09:52:38 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Mr. Chairman.
09:52:40 I'm sorry, I stepped out for one second. The motion
09:52:42 was Ms. Mulhern's motion?
09:52:45 >> 15 and 16, yes.
09:52:47 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: And I'm not sure how it's related
09:52:49 but I wanted to ask Karen Palus to come in 30 days and
09:52:52 talk to us about the resolution that we adopted on
09:52:58 October 1st, resolution 2009-946 and also about
09:53:03 the tennis program and the issues raised by Mr. Shull.
09:53:10 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Moved and seconded.
09:53:13 Moved by councilman Dingfelder, seconded by councilman
09:53:15 Miranda to come in and talk to us in 30 days on the
09:53:18 whole issue, the tennis issue and resolution.
09:53:21 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: What is 30 days?
09:53:24 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: First meeting of December.
09:53:31 >> December 3rd.
09:53:34 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Just for the record.
09:53:37 >>THOMAS SCOTT: It's been moved and seconded.

09:53:40 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
09:53:42 Opposes?
09:53:43 Okay.
09:53:44 Ordinance being read.
09:53:47 Councilman Dingfelder.
09:53:48 >>> I didn't know if you wanted to speak on item 1.
09:53:59 I thought you called item 1.
09:54:00 Did I jump the gun?
09:54:02 >> The first item.
09:54:03 Did you want to speak to that item?
09:54:05 >>> Just if you needed.
09:54:11 Ernest Mueller, assistant city attorney, this is an
09:54:15 ordinance before you for first reading fur sunset to
09:54:17 council's request regarding striking that recently
09:54:20 added language to 23.5.
09:54:23 It creates a class 1 violation of any other city code
09:54:29 violation in the fines and penalty section of the
09:54:34 civil citation process.
09:54:35 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
09:54:41 Not speaking for Mr. Dingfelder, but this is exactly
09:54:43 what Mr. Dingfelder brought up and I seconded.
09:54:46 When we did this some time ago on a different subject

09:54:49 matter, we took a broad form and just passed it
09:54:52 without looking at the text of what ramifications it
09:54:56 would have later on.
09:54:57 In essence, this is the same thing.
09:55:00 This in essence gives a blank check to an individual
09:55:02 who may or may not be trained and doing citation that
09:55:07 is may or may not fall within their jurisdictions.
09:55:10 Therefore, a blank check to go out and get somebody in
09:55:20 Drew Park where this is a junk yard where it's a
09:55:24 salvage yard, it creates a hardship.
09:55:26 Many people don't have the individuals to pay and they
09:55:28 have to hire people to come here and represent them.
09:55:30 And in essence when they get here, guess what -- it's
09:55:33 forgiven.
09:55:34 I have a stack of all this that I can show the council
09:55:41 that made the presentation, I can show you a sign that
09:55:43 says no parking on city right-of-way.
09:55:45 And right under that sign is a little sign that says
09:55:48 parking for such a business only.
09:55:50 Who are we kidding?
09:55:52 We have a problem that if you are going to do this,
09:55:56 you better send a lot of people to a lot of training

09:55:58 to understand.
09:55:59 A sign in Drew Park means one thing.
09:56:02 A sign in downtown means another.
09:56:03 Because they are forgiven.
09:56:05 But the little person down the street, who may not be
09:56:08 in violation, is cited.
09:56:11 And in today's society, they are nervous.
09:56:13 They don't have the money.
09:56:14 And we are putting them out of business.
09:56:16 And therefore I just will not support something that
09:56:18 is a blank check like we did in another part of the
09:56:22 city just recently, and we are bringing it up in 30
09:56:25 days from now.
09:56:26 I don't like to give an open check to anybody.
09:56:28 If you violate it, certainly you should be cited.
09:56:31 And certainly you have 30 days to make restitution
09:56:35 like I believe the law says.
09:56:36 But if you are not, then leave you a loan.
09:56:39 There's nothing wrong with this city that can't be
09:56:41 fixed.
09:56:42 But we bring people here.
09:56:44 We hammer them.

09:56:46 And then we forgive them at the same time.
09:56:48 Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
09:56:49 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: A question for Mr. Mueller.
09:56:55 This is the citation that we have been discussing for
09:56:58 a long time.
09:56:58 This gives code enforcement employees the opportunity
09:57:03 to write a citation, correct?
09:57:05 >>ERNEST MUELLER: That's already in process.
09:57:09 What this is doing, a month or so ago, two weeks, a
09:57:14 month or so ago, you passed an ordinance that made
09:57:18 changes to 23.5, that added additional code sections.
09:57:22 Mostly from the transportation department or
09:57:25 transportation code that dealt with right-of-way
09:57:26 issues.
09:57:28 Also in there was this language that was specifying or
09:57:32 saying that any section of the code that we haven't
09:57:35 specifically identified will be a class 1 that would
09:57:39 have allowed us some sort of enforcement method in
09:57:42 case something came up rather than having to try and
09:57:44 get something passed in six months.
09:57:47 This is striking that.
09:57:48 There was a request to remove that language.

09:57:50 So that's what this ordinance is doing, is removing
09:57:54 that particular language.
09:57:57 It's that catch-all language in class 1.
09:58:00 Otherwise 23.5 in the ordinance will stay the same.
09:58:03 It's just removing that language -- the overall
09:58:09 language.
09:58:09 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Given that this is narrowing the
09:58:12 focus, I feel comfortable with it and I'll move it.
09:58:18 I'll move it.
09:58:19 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I want to make sure, Ms.
09:58:24 Saul-Sena -- and I appreciate and agree with you.
09:58:26 If this takes away the broadness and gives them just
09:58:29 the right to do what they are supposed to be doing,
09:58:32 I'm all for it.
09:58:33 There's no problem with that at all.
09:58:34 >>GWEN MILLER: That is a reconsideration, that is the
09:58:37 ordinance that I had asked to change because it's too
09:58:39 broad, and the city is bringing it back now to change
09:58:43 the wording.
09:58:43 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Ms. Saul-Sena, do you want to read
09:58:47 it?
09:58:48 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I would like to move an ordinance

09:58:49 of the city of Tampa, Florida striking language
09:58:51 recently added to section 23.5-5-A that designated as
09:58:57 a class 1 violation any violation of the Tampa city
09:59:00 code not already scheduled of fines and penalties,
09:59:05 providing for repeal of all ordinances in conflict,
09:59:09 providing for severability, providing an effective
09:59:10 date.
09:59:10 >> Seconded by councilman Miranda.
09:59:13 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I won't be supporting the motion.
09:59:17 Frankly, I think code enforcement does an excellent
09:59:21 job, and I think that they need as many tools as
09:59:24 possible in -- what is it called, their quiver?
09:59:31 To, you know, to make this a better city.
09:59:34 And I don't think that they would abuse that power, I
09:59:40 don't think they do abuse that power.
09:59:42 I think they are out there and they have one of the
09:59:44 toughest jobs in the city.
09:59:45 And I am not going to support it.
09:59:49 I think it was a good attempt by staff and by legal to
09:59:51 broaden -- it is broad, and I think it was intentional
09:59:56 to broaden their authority.
09:59:57 And I don't think they would abuse it.

09:59:59 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I am going to tell you why I'm
10:00:02 supporting it.
10:00:03 Some months back I got a call that said, we have all
10:00:05 these violations on the corner of Himes and St. Louis.
10:00:08 What do you want me to do with them?
10:00:10 I said you do whatever you want to do.
10:00:13 You don't work for me.
10:00:14 He said I am going to ticket them.
10:00:16 I said, let me ask you, as a code enforcement officer
10:00:20 you don't have a right to ticket anyone.
10:00:22 So that day I took my little camera out that my
10:00:26 son-in-law got me, the best gift I ever got in my
10:00:30 life.
10:00:31 And I went down Henderson Boulevard to the Outback.
10:00:33 Great place.
10:00:34 Ate there often.
10:00:35 They got the same illegal parking that the other guy
10:00:38 had.
10:00:38 But they don't ticket them.
10:00:39 And they back out into Henderson Boulevard.
10:00:42 This guy is in the right-of-way.
10:00:44 He's about eight feet out in a street that's got

10:00:46 maybe, oh, a circulatory movement of cars of about 20
10:00:51 a day.
10:00:52 And that one has about 20 seconds.
10:00:56 And I tell myself, isn't this wonderful?
10:00:58 So that's why I'm supporting the ordinance.
10:01:00 >> Moved and seconded.
10:01:02 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
10:01:04 Opposes?
10:01:05 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Dingfelder voting
10:01:07 no.
10:01:07 Second reading of the ordinance will be held November
10:01:10 19th at 9:30 a.m.
10:01:12 >>THOMAS SCOTT: We go to our committee reports.
10:01:14 The first committee is public safety.
10:01:16 Councilwoman Miller.
10:01:18 >>GWEN MILLER: I move items 2 through 12.
10:01:20 >> Seconded by councilman Miranda.
10:01:25 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
10:01:27 Opposes?
10:01:28 Okay.
10:01:29 We move now to parks and recreation.
10:01:31 Councilwoman Saul-Sena.

10:01:31 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
10:01:33 I want to point out items 13 and 14 are making
10:01:36 improvements to Ben T. Davis beach.
10:01:39 This is long overdue.
10:01:40 I'm pleased we are doing this.
10:01:41 I would like to move items 13 and 14, and 17 through
10:01:46 19.
10:01:46 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Second.
10:01:51 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Item 97 needs to be included, a late
10:01:58 add-on.
10:01:59 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: 97?
10:02:02 >> Consent item but it was a late add-on.
10:02:04 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: And 97.
10:02:07 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Second.
10:02:08 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Seconded by councilman Miranda.
10:02:11 All in favor?
10:02:12 Opposes?
10:02:13 Pulled item 15 and 16 for staff to show up on that.
10:02:17 Public works.
10:02:17 Council Charlie Miranda.
10:02:19 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Move 20 through 27.
10:02:22 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Seconded by councilman Dingfelder.

10:02:28 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
10:02:31 Opposes?
10:02:35 Finance Committee.
10:02:37 Councilwoman Mulhern.
10:02:38 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
10:02:40 I move items number 28 through 35.
10:02:43 >> Seconded by councilman Miranda.
10:02:46 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
10:02:48 Opposes?
10:02:50 Building and zoning.
10:02:51 Council M.A.P. Caetano.
10:02:52 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: I would like to move items 36
10:02:55 through 57.
10:02:56 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Second.
10:03:00 >> All in favor signify by saying Aye.
10:03:03 Opposes?
10:03:04 Okay.
10:03:05 The transportation committee, councilman Dingfelder.
10:03:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Thank you, ma'am, Mr. Chairman.
10:03:10 Move items 58 through 65.
10:03:12 >>MARY MULHERN: Second.
10:03:14 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Moved and seconded.

10:03:17 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
10:03:20 Opposes?
10:03:21 We have a public hearing now on second reading of the
10:03:24 proposed ordinance number 66.
10:03:29 Move to open?
10:03:30 >> So moved.
10:03:30 >> Second.
10:03:31 >> All in favor?
10:03:33 Opposes?
10:03:33 Anyone from the public wish to address council on item
10:03:36 66?
10:03:37 Anyone wish to address council on item 66?
10:03:40 Motion to close.
10:03:41 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: So moved.
10:03:42 >> Second.
10:03:43 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Councilman Dingfelder, do you want to
10:03:49 read item 66?
10:03:52 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Move an ordinance of the city of
10:03:59 Tampa, Florida amending City of Tampa code chapter 28,
10:04:03 special events, section 28-32 and section 28-34, said
10:04:06 amendment being necessary to amend the requirements
10:04:08 for review and approval of special event permits and

10:04:11 to amend the requirements of the special event
10:04:13 committee meetings providing for repeal of all
10:04:15 ordinances in conflict providing an effective date.
10:04:17 This is moved for approval on second reading.
10:04:19 >>THOMAS SCOTT: It's been moved and seconded.
10:04:24 Seconded by councilman Miranda.
10:04:26 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried unanimously.
10:04:32 >>THOMAS SCOTT: We have continued public hearing on
10:04:39 item 67.
10:04:40 Item 67.
10:04:49 It says continued public hearing, second reading.
10:04:51 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Mr. Chairman, for the record,
10:05:01 let's open all of them, to 75.
10:05:04 That way we can continue so there --
10:05:07 Okay.
10:05:08 Motion and second to open all the public hearing
10:05:10 items.
10:05:11 All in favor say Aye.
10:05:13 Let the record note Councilwoman Mulhern seconded
10:05:16 that.
10:05:16 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Do you want to swear the witnesses?
10:05:19 >> Yes.

10:05:20 If you are going to speak to council, please stand and
10:05:22 be sworn at this time.
10:05:23 >>MARTIN SHELBY: On item 67 through 75.
10:05:27 >>THOMAS SCOTT: For public hearing.
10:05:28 Please stand and be sworn.
10:05:29 (Oath administered by Clerk)
10:05:30 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Item 67.
10:05:36 >>ABBYE FEELEY: Land Development Coordination.
10:05:41 Item 67 is actually a second reading.
10:05:43 I believe we did close the first, and there was a
10:05:46 motion made.
10:05:48 Those plans have been certified and it is ready for
10:05:50 second reading.
10:05:51 All a of the items for your second readings today that
10:05:54 require certified site plans, they have been certified
10:05:57 and provided to the clerk's office.
10:05:59 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Does anyone wish to address council
10:06:01 on item 67 from the public?
10:06:03 Motion to close?
10:06:04 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Move to close.
10:06:05 >> Second.
10:06:08 All in favor?

10:06:10 >> Councilwoman Mulhern, item 67.
10:06:12 >>MARY MULHERN: I move an ordinance being presented
10:06:16 for second reading and adoption, an ordinance rezoning
10:06:19 property in the general vicinity of 3822 and 3824
10:06:24 south Himes Avenue in the city of Tampa, Florida and
10:06:26 more particularly described in section 1 from zoning
10:06:29 district classifications CG commercial general to PD
10:06:33 planned development, commercial general uses, lot A
10:06:36 and B, single-family residential, lot B, providing an
10:06:39 effective date.
10:06:41 Continued from October 15, 2009.
10:06:43 >>GWEN MILLER: Moved and seconded by councilman
10:06:47 Miranda.
10:06:48 Record your vote, please.
10:06:48 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried unanimously.
10:06:58 >> Item 68.
10:06:59 Item 68.
10:07:04 Anyone from the public?
10:07:05 >> Move to close.
10:07:06 >> Second.
10:07:07 (Motion carried).
10:07:07 >> I move an ordinance providing a special use permit

10:07:10 S-2 approving a bank with a drive-in window in a CG
10:07:14 commercial general and RS-75 residential single-family
10:07:17 zoning district in the general vicinity of 3010 West
10:07:21 Gandy Boulevard in the city of Tampa, Florida as more
10:07:24 particularly described in section 1 hereof providing
10:07:26 an effective date.
10:07:26 >> Seconded by councilman Dingfelder.
10:07:30 Record your vote, please.
10:07:31 >>THE CLERK: Moss carried unanimously.
10:07:38 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Item 69.
10:07:41 Anyone from the public wish to address council?
10:07:44 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Move to close.
10:07:46 >>MARY MULHERN: Second.
10:07:48 (Motion carried).
10:07:50 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Item 69.
10:07:51 >>GWEN MILLER: Move to adopt the following importance
10:07:52 upon second reading.
10:07:53 An ordinance approving a special use permit S-2 for
10:07:56 alcoholic beverages sales, small venue and making
10:08:00 lawful the sale of beverages containing alcohol of
10:08:02 more than 1% by weight and not more than 14% by weight
10:08:06 and wines regardless of alcoholic content, beer and

10:08:09 wine, 2(APS), in sealed containers for consumption off
10:08:13 premises only at or from that certain lot, plot or
10:08:16 tract of land located at 2928 east Fowler Avenue,
10:08:20 Tampa, Florida, as more particularly described in
10:08:23 section 2 hereof, providing for repeal of all
10:08:26 ordinances in conflict, providing an effective date.
10:08:28 >>MARY MULHERN: Second.
10:08:31 >> Record your vote.
10:08:33 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried unanimously.
10:08:43 >> Item 70.
10:08:44 Anyone wishing to address council?
10:08:47 Motion to close?
10:08:48 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: So moved.
10:08:49 >> Second.
10:08:49 >> All in favor say Aye.
10:08:52 Opposed?
10:08:53 Item 70.
10:08:53 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Move an ordinance presented for
10:08:56 second reading and adoption, an ordinance approving a
10:08:58 special use permit S-2 for alcoholic beverage sales,
10:09:01 small venue and making lawful the sale of beverages
10:09:05 containing alcohol of more than 1% by weight and not

10:09:08 more than 14% by weight and wines regardless of
10:09:11 alcoholic content, beer and wine, 2(COP-R), for
10:09:13 consumption on the premises only in connection with a
10:09:16 restaurant business establishment on that certain lot,
10:09:18 plot or tract of land located at 100 east Madison
10:09:22 street, Tampa, Florida, as more particularly described
10:09:24 in section 2 hereof, providing for repeal of all
10:09:27 ordinances in conflict, providing an effective date.
10:09:28 >>THOMAS SCOTT: It's been moved and seconded by
10:09:32 Councilwoman Mulhern.
10:09:34 Record your vote, please.
10:09:35 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried unanimously.
10:09:42 >> Item 71.
10:09:44 Anyone wish to address council on item 71?
10:09:49 >> Move to close.
10:09:50 >> Second.
10:09:50 (Motion carried)
10:09:52 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: An ordinance being presented for
10:09:54 second reading on adoption an ordinance approving a
10:09:57 special use permit S-2 for alcoholic beverage sales,
10:10:01 small venue and making lawful the sale of beverages
10:10:03 containing alcohol of more than 1% by weight and not

10:10:05 more than 14% by weight and wines regardless of
10:10:09 alcoholic content, beer and wine, 2(COP-R), for
10:10:14 consumption on the premises only in connection with a
10:10:16 restaurant business establishment on that certain lot,
10:10:20 plot or tract of land located at 2202 East 7th Avenue,
10:10:25 Tampa, Florida, as more particularly described in
10:10:27 section 2 hereof, providing for repeal of all
10:10:30 ordinances in conflict, providing an effective date.
10:10:32 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Moved and seconded.
10:10:38 Record your vote, please.
10:10:39 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Miranda being absent
10:10:51 at vote.
10:10:51 >> Item 72.
10:10:53 Anyone here wishing to address council on item 72?
10:10:56 >>GWEN MILLER: Move to close.
10:10:57 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Second.
10:10:58 >> All in favor signify by saying Aye.
10:11:01 Councilman Dingfelder, item 782.
10:11:03 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I move the following ordinance for
10:11:06 second reading, an ordinance approving a special use
10:11:08 permits S-2 for alcoholic beverage sales, small venue,
10:11:13 and making lawful the sale of beverages containing

10:11:15 alcohol of more than 1% by weight and not more than
10:11:17 14% by weight and wines regardless of alcoholic
10:11:20 content, beer and wine, 2(COP-R), for consumption on
10:11:23 the premises only in connection with a restaurant
10:11:25 business establishment on that certain lot, plot or
10:11:28 tract of land located at 19050 Bruce B. Downs
10:11:32 Boulevard, Tampa, Florida, as more particularly
10:11:34 described in section 2 hereof providing for repeal of
10:11:37 all ordinances in conflict, providing an effective
10:11:38 date.
10:11:38 >> Seconded by Councilwoman Mulhern.
10:11:42 Record your vote, please.
10:11:54 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Miranda absent at
10:11:56 vote.
10:11:57 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Item 73.
10:11:58 Anyone wishing to address council on item 73?
10:12:02 >>GWEN MILLER: Move to close.
10:12:03 >> Second.
10:12:03 (Motion carried)
10:12:05 >>MARY MULHERN: I move an ordinance being presented
10:12:06 for second reading and adoption, an ordinance rezoning
10:12:09 property in the general vicinity of 601 east Whiting

10:12:11 Street in the city of Tampa, Florida and more
10:12:14 particularly described in section 1 from zoning
10:12:17 district classifications CBD-2 central business
10:12:20 district to CBD-2, central business district,
10:12:24 residential multifamily, providing an effective date.
10:12:25 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Moved and seconded by councilman
10:12:29 Dingfelder.
10:12:30 Record your vote, please.
10:12:31 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Miranda being absent
10:12:39 at vote.
10:12:39 >> Item 74.
10:12:41 Item 74.
10:12:42 Anyone wishing to address council?
10:12:45 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Move to close.
10:12:46 >>MARY MULHERN: Second.
10:12:47 (Motion carried)
10:12:49 >>GWEN MILLER: I move to adopt the following
10:12:50 ordinance upon second reading.
10:12:52 An ordinance rezoning property in the general vicinity
10:12:54 of 2815 and 2817 west Parkland Boulevard in the city
10:12:59 of Tampa, Florida, and more particularly described in
10:13:01 section 1 from zoning district classifications RS-75

10:13:05 residential single-family and PD planned development,
10:13:08 residential single-family, to PD, planned development,
10:13:12 residential single-family, providing an effective
10:13:13 date.
10:13:13 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Moved and seconded by Councilwoman
10:13:18 Mulhern.
10:13:19 Record your vote, please.
10:13:20 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Miranda being absent
10:13:28 at vote.
10:13:29 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Item 75.
10:13:31 >>GWEN MILLER: Move to close.
10:13:36 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Just so the record is clear --
10:13:40 Does anyone in the public wish to address council?
10:13:42 Moved and seconded.
10:13:43 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
10:13:57 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I would like to move the following
10:13:59 ordinance for second reading and adoption.
10:14:01 An ordinance rezoning property in the general advice
10:14:04 interests of 2005 and 2107 east Osborne Avenue and
10:14:09 4616 north 22nd street in the city of Tampa, Florida
10:14:13 and more particularly described in section 1 from
10:14:15 zoning district classifications CG commercial general,

10:14:20 RS-50 residential single-family, and PD planned
10:14:23 development single-family attached, semi-detached, to
10:14:27 PD planned development clinic, providing an effective
10:14:29 date.
10:14:30 But I wonder if I could put a caveat on that.
10:14:32 And this is a question for the staff.
10:14:36 I don't have any problems with this rezoning.
10:14:39 But at our first hearing, there was a historic house,
10:14:44 the Hargrett bungalow that was identified, and we
10:14:49 asked the city to work with the property owner to move
10:14:51 it.
10:14:52 And the property owner indicated that he would be
10:14:55 willing to allow someone to move it but he had no
10:14:58 interests in it.
10:14:59 And I think that this is a historic resource.
10:15:05 We have money, because it's in East Tampa, to do the
10:15:08 movement.
10:15:09 Mr. Dingfelder wrote a letter to Ed Johnson, the CRA
10:15:14 person from East Tampa, and the question I have is,
10:15:18 can we allow this rezoning to go ahead would with the
10:15:21 caveat that a demolition permit will not be allowed
10:15:26 for that building for 30 days to give the city a

10:15:31 chance to work with the property owner and move this
10:15:33 historic house?
10:15:35 >>MARTIN SHELBY: If that is a question you wish to
10:15:37 have answered --
10:15:39 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: That is a question I wish to have
10:15:40 answered.
10:15:41 >>MARTIN SHELBY: You need to reopen the public
10:15:43 hearing.
10:15:43 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I move to the reopen the public
10:15:45 hearing.
10:15:45 This is important.
10:15:46 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Moved and seconded.
10:15:47 (Motion carried)
10:15:48 >>JULIA COLE: Legal department.
10:15:50 First let me just say procedurally, at this time at
10:15:54 second reading if there is a new condition that you
10:15:56 wish to place on this rezoning, you would have to --
10:16:00 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I don't know that it's something
10:16:01 we have to place on the rezoning.
10:16:03 I'm asking, can we not allow a demolition permit for
10:16:07 30 days?
10:16:09 >>JULIA COLE: The demolition permit would be through

10:16:12 your regular processes.
10:16:14 Now, I understand that this home has not been
10:16:17 designated.
10:16:18 But I do understand that when you have structures that
10:16:22 are over a certain age that go forward for a
10:16:25 demolition, that those demolition requests are also
10:16:29 forwarded to our historic preservation manager for a
10:16:32 determination as to whether or not there should be
10:16:35 some moving forward with a designation process, or at
10:16:39 least contemplating that.
10:16:40 So that's the process that you have in place today.
10:16:44 So that's what would be followed.
10:16:46 Anything else would obligate a condition on this
10:16:50 rezoning which I'm not really sure.
10:16:52 I would have to think about legally whether or not
10:16:54 that would even be appropriate, given the nature of
10:16:56 the request and the fact that this is not a designated
10:17:00 structure.
10:17:00 So I think even if that is something that you did want
10:17:02 to condition this rezoning on --
10:17:05 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Is there a representative from the
10:17:06 petitioner here?

10:17:12 Okay.
10:17:14 Have you been contacted by Ed Johnson of the city CRA
10:17:17 and talked to him about potentially getting this house
10:17:20 moved?
10:17:20 >>> Well, we actually talked about it that night after
10:17:23 the meeting.
10:17:23 >>THOMAS SCOTT: State your name.
10:17:24 >>> I'm Stephani Seiger, Tampa health centers.
10:17:30 I love what you are doing.
10:17:32 The plan is beautiful and I don't want to hold you up.
10:17:34 I want to save this house if we can.
10:17:36 >>> We talked about it immediately after the meeting.
10:17:38 We did speak about it.
10:17:39 But my actual CEO is out of town right now.
10:17:43 And I don't think we talked anything beyond that.
10:17:46 I mean, we are willing to work with them to try to
10:17:48 move the house but we haven't done any other
10:17:50 conversation beyond that to my knowledge.
10:17:52 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Okay.
10:17:53 Would you be willing to?
10:17:56 Basically what was said if it doesn't cost anything
10:18:03 you are willing to let it go.

10:18:05 So it's really in the city's court to do something.
10:18:08 >> Yes.
10:18:09 And we are willing to work with you.
10:18:10 >> And you are not going to apply for a demolition
10:18:12 permit in the next week, I would hope?
10:18:14 >> Well, we were planning on applying on the because
10:18:18 of the stimulus dollars and need to move forward with
10:18:20 the project.
10:18:20 So I don't think working with the city would put us
10:18:22 back that much farther.
10:18:25 But I would have to talk to him to make sure.
10:18:27 >>THOMAS SCOTT: I don't know.
10:18:29 >>I don't want to commit to something not being --
10:18:32 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you.
10:18:33 Does anybody from legal know what the rules are in
10:18:35 terms of how much time there is between a person
10:18:36 applying for a demolition permit with a structure
10:18:39 that's over 50 years old and the staff turn around?
10:18:44 >>JULIA COLE: I don't know the answer.
10:18:45 >> Could you find out in the next 15 minutes?
10:18:48 >>> I could attempt to find out in the next 15
10:18:50 minutes.

10:18:50 I could contact Mr. Hernandez.
10:18:53 I don't know if that means you hold the rezoning.
10:18:57 I'm not going to hold the rezoning.
10:18:59 The ball is in the city's court and I want us to get
10:19:01 going and that's the thing.
10:19:02 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Councilman Dingfelder.
10:19:04 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Ms. Saul-Sena, I'm glad you picked
10:19:09 up on that.
10:19:10 I forgot that one was coming back.
10:19:12 Next week we have our CRA meeting, next Thursday.
10:19:15 So why don't we -- could we add that to the CRA agenda
10:19:20 and get a report from Ed Johnson on that issue and see
10:19:23 where that is?
10:19:26 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Excellent.
10:19:26 Thank you.
10:19:29 I'm ready to read the motion.
10:19:31 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Motion to close.
10:19:32 >> So moved.
10:19:33 >> Second.
10:19:33 (Motion carried)
10:19:35 >> Have we read the ordinance?
10:19:38 >>GWEN MILLER: Yes.

10:19:38 But we didn't vote, though.
10:19:39 >> Record your vote, please.
10:19:42 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Mr. Chairman, can we make a motion
10:19:45 after?
10:19:46 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried unanimously.
10:19:48 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: A motion to put that on the CRA
10:19:50 agenda, a report from Mr --
10:19:54 City Council can't do it.
10:19:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Otherwise to get on the agenda --
10:19:59 >>GWEN MILLER: You can request but you can't --
10:20:01 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I would like to make a motion that
10:20:03 take T CRA chairman ask Mr. Johnson, that he set up a
10:20:06 conversation immediately with the -- and he has your
10:20:09 contact information?
10:20:11 So report back.
10:20:15 What is the address of the house?
10:20:21 North 22nd street, and the opportunity to work with
10:20:24 the property owner to move the historic house to
10:20:29 another property.
10:20:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: One second, ma'am.
10:20:33 Mr. Chairman, if I could.
10:20:35 The only thing I was going to add is, would you look

10:20:38 and see what the cost is going to be to demolish it?
10:20:41 And then maybe that could be used to help somebody
10:20:44 move it.
10:20:44 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: A motion and then it was seconded.
10:20:55 It was just a request.
10:20:56 >>THOMAS SCOTT: All in favor signify by saying Aye.
10:21:00 Opposes?
10:21:01 Okay.
10:21:02 Item 76 seconded by Councilwoman Mulhern.
10:21:16 (Motion carried)
10:21:17 Anyone wishing to address council on item 76?
10:21:21 >>GWEN MILLER: Move to close.
10:21:23 >> Second.
10:21:24 (Motion carried)
10:21:25 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: An ordinance being presented for
10:21:27 second reading and adoption, an ordinance rezoning
10:21:29 property in the general vicinity of 10851 Cross Creek
10:21:32 Boulevard in the city of Tampa, Florida and more
10:21:35 particularly described in section 1 from zoning
10:21:38 district classifications PD-A, planned developmental
10:21:41 alternative, residential, retail, office, general
10:21:45 commercial, to PD-A, planned developmental

10:21:48 alternative, residential, retail, office, general
10:21:51 commercial, providing an effective date.
10:21:52 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Seconded by councilman Dingfelder.
10:21:57 Record your vote, please.
10:21:58 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried unanimously.
10:22:08 >> We move to our 10:30 items.
10:22:11 >>JULIA COLE: Legal department.
10:22:14 I know you heard were on the CRA agenda but I did
10:22:21 obtain an answer from Dennis Fernandez.
10:22:28 For some kind of historic significance 60 days to
10:22:31 review the issue and to assist or do whatever they
10:22:33 think is appropriate, take it to the board, maybe look
10:22:35 for a new location, those kinds of questions.
10:22:37 I do understand the particular property is subject to
10:22:39 stimulus money, and I think Dennis will be prepared to
10:22:42 move that quicker given the situation.
10:22:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'll help your agenda out a little
10:22:49 bit.
10:22:50 On item 90, regarding hydroelectric energy production
10:22:55 over the dam, I think we all got a memo back from Mr.
10:23:00 Baird on that.
10:23:01 I'm comfortable with that.

10:23:02 He and I had discussion and unless other council
10:23:05 members have a question I'm good with the written
10:23:08 report alone.
10:23:08 >> That's item 90.
10:23:11 Do you want to --
10:23:13 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Just move to receive and file the
10:23:15 written report.
10:23:16 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Item 90.
10:23:18 Move to receive and file.
10:23:19 Seconded by Ms. Mulhern.
10:23:21 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
10:23:23 Opposes?
10:23:26 We need to take up the first item, if we can.
10:23:30 The rezoning.
10:23:31 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Mr. Chairman, I have a request on
10:23:34 that if we could hold that till 10:30 because there
10:23:37 might be somebody who would be waiting to come in for
10:23:39 that specific item.
10:23:41 I apologize, but perhaps there are other things.
10:23:45 For instance, item 81 is a report that Lee
10:23:48 Huffstutler, chief accountant gave regarding the full
10:23:51 cost allocation, if you want a discussion on that.

10:24:05 Move to 77 and 78.
10:24:10 We don't want Mrs. Wise to come up --
10:24:12 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'm sorry, I don't know whether
10:24:14 you -- somebody might want her here on 92.
10:24:17 That's a different issue.
10:24:18 >> They are tied together if I understand.
10:24:22 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'm confused.
10:24:24 >> Let's go down to 77.
10:24:27 Let's take 77.
10:24:28 That's to receive and file.
10:24:30 Item 77.
10:24:34 Moved and seconded.
10:24:34 >>SHIRLEY FOXX-KNOWLES: City clerk.
10:24:41 I'm here regarding item 77 through 80.
10:24:45 Item 77, the Barrio Latino commission, we have one
10:24:50 vacancy for alternate position.
10:24:53 However, we have no applicants.
10:24:55 And we will readvertise that one.
10:24:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Does that have a professional
10:25:00 requirement, Shirley?
10:25:01 >>SHIRLEY FOXX-KNOWLES: No, it's an alternate
10:25:06 position.

10:25:07 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: It's an open seat?
10:25:10 I understand they have to be a resident of Ybor City
10:25:13 district.
10:25:16 But nothing real special on that one.
10:25:19 An alternate.
10:25:21 We also don't have a problem with the quorum right
10:25:24 now.
10:25:24 So we do have an opportunity there.
10:25:28 On item 78, civil service board, we have one vacancy
10:25:33 for council appointment and one applicant.
10:25:39 Mr. Michael Suarez.
10:25:43 He's a commercial risk management consultant.
10:25:46 He's not here, I don't believe.
10:25:48 However, we have two letters of recommendation.
10:25:56 I believe that has been forwarded to you.
10:25:58 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Before we go any further, I would
10:26:03 like the department -- I know the gentleman very well.
10:26:07 He's very well qualified.
10:26:08 But the way, the way I read things last night he's
10:26:12 applied for two of them, because there's only two
10:26:14 applicants.

10:26:15 And the other one is something and the other one is
10:26:18 something else and he qualified for both.
10:26:21 Can he serve on two boards?
10:26:22 I don't know.
10:26:23 >>SHIRLEY FOXX-KNOWLES: My understanding is he can.
10:26:26 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I want to make sure.
10:26:29 I have no problem with it as long as legally.
10:26:30 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Well, legal did advise -- is anyone
10:26:37 here from legal?
10:26:38 >> I don't know if he wants to do both.
10:26:41 >>THOMAS SCOTT: We don't have no attorneys here?
10:26:45 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: We are having a side bar.
10:26:53 >>JULIA COLE: Legal department.
10:26:55 I am not really sure how to answer that question.
10:26:57 I would probably go ahead --
10:26:59 I was told that they could do it but I just want to
10:27:01 get it on the record because councilman Miranda was
10:27:03 raising that as an issue.
10:27:05 >>JULIA COLE: I would want to defer.
10:27:08 >> We'll defer that, Mr. Miranda, if you don't mind.
10:27:11 But we can go ahead and approve him for this one
10:27:13 position.

10:27:13 Is that right?
10:27:16 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: So moved.
10:27:18 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Second.
10:27:18 >> Moved and seconded.
10:27:22 (Motion carried)
10:27:23 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I know his wife.
10:27:24 I don't believe she wants him on both.
10:27:25 [ Laughter ]
10:27:28 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Maybe she does.
10:27:30 >>SHIRLEY FOXX-KNOWLES: Moving on to 79, enterprise
10:27:33 zone, development agency.
10:27:35 We have two vacancies due to resignations and two
10:27:42 applicants.
10:27:43 Emanuel A. Leto, program outreach coordinator for the
10:27:48 history center, and Stuart Milton Rogers.
10:27:51 I don't know if they are here.
10:27:52 >>> Thank you for allowing me to speak.
10:28:00 My name is Emanuel Leto, a resident of Ybor City,
10:28:03 which is part of Tampa's enterprise zone.
10:28:06 I'm also an employee of the Tampa Bay history center.
10:28:09 I have been on the enterprise zone for the past three

10:28:11 years.
10:28:12 We started some work there basically with marketing
10:28:16 the enterprise zone and making business owners within
10:28:19 the zone more aware of the benefits and incentives
10:28:23 that are available.
10:28:24 And I would like to be considered for reappointment to
10:28:26 that board so we can continue with the work that we
10:28:29 have begun and instituted over the past three years.
10:28:33 So I will just keep my remarks brief and say thank
10:28:36 you.
10:28:36 >> Thank you very much.
10:28:38 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you for your service.
10:28:39 >>THOMAS SCOTT: We'll come back to that.
10:28:43 >>> Stewart Rogers.
10:28:50 I'm chief operating officer at Hamilton engineering
10:28:54 in, downtown.
10:28:57 I lived in the city of Zephyrhills, downtown
10:28:59 redevelopment committee.
10:29:00 I'm very interested in -- and also come in contact
10:29:03 with a lot of folks who might be developers or new
10:29:06 businesses coming into town and I think it would allow
10:29:11 the perspective of this committee.

10:29:12 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Move both of these fine
10:29:16 individuals.
10:29:17 >> Second.
10:29:18 >> All in favor?
10:29:22 Opposes?
10:29:23 We'll hear from legal now.
10:29:24 >>SAL TERRITO: Sorry I wasn't here.
10:29:26 The question about whether the person can serve on
10:29:29 two.
10:29:29 Only if they are not considered to be office holder
10:29:32 positions and one of them is an advisory body, as
10:29:35 such, there's not a conflict of being on both of them.
10:29:38 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Thank you, sir.
10:29:40 >>SHIRLEY FOXX-KNOWLES: The last item, item 80, equal
10:29:47 business opportunity advisory council.
10:29:50 We have two positions available.
10:29:52 One for Hispanic American citizen, and one for
10:29:56 Caucasian female citizen.
10:29:58 We have two applicants again, Mr. Michael Suarez, for
10:30:02 the Hispanic American, and Ms. Jamie Kahns for the
10:30:09 Caucasian female citizen.
10:30:10 And I believe Ms. Kahns is here.

10:30:15 >> Good morning.
10:30:19 My name is Jamie Kahns. I'm a development manager for
10:30:24 the American Lung Association.
10:30:25 I lived in this great area for eight years now and I
10:30:27 would be very excited to have this opportunity to give
10:30:29 back to my community and to volunteer and be a part of
10:30:32 this equal business opportunity advisory council.
10:30:35 I feel that I would be a great fit for it because I
10:30:38 have patience, I'm a great listener, I have passion of
10:30:42 working with people, and I really do want to make a
10:30:44 difference.
10:30:45 I appreciate the opportunity to talk to you today.
10:30:48 Thank you for the opportunity.
10:30:50 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Move Ms. Suarez and Ms. Conn.
10:30:55 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Seconded by Councilwoman Mulhern.
10:30:58 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
10:31:00 Opposes?
10:31:01 Okay.
10:31:02 Thank you very much.
10:31:04 Item 81.
10:31:09 There was a motion earlier.
10:31:11 Mr. Dingfelder, did you make that motion?

10:31:14 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Ms. Mulhern did.
10:31:15 I seconded it.
10:31:16 >>THOMAS SCOTT: The motion to receive and file 81.
10:31:20 Moved and seconded.
10:31:21 Motion by Councilwoman Mulhern, seconded by councilman
10:31:24 Miranda.
10:31:26 All in favor?
10:31:27 Opposes?
10:31:28 Okay.
10:31:28 I am going to ask item 92.
10:31:46 >>BONNIE WISE: Item 92 relates to the CIP
10:31:50 reimbursement program for the city, a program that has
10:31:52 been in existence since 1987, has been initially
10:31:55 recommended by external auditors, in order to give us
10:31:58 the opportunity to capture the full cost of our
10:32:02 capital improvement projects.
10:32:03 And so what we do with that, we allocate those
10:32:06 indirect and direct costs of our public works,
10:32:10 contract admin department, and ensure that all
10:32:13 projects get those charges accordingly.
10:32:16 What we do is that each year, we have been using a
10:32:20 certain percentage over the past full years, past few

10:32:22 years.
10:32:23 It's to determine what those costs for those various
10:32:25 departments everybody and allocate them for our
10:32:29 upcoming capital projects.
10:32:30 And occasionally what has happened, and I think the
10:32:33 reason that this motion was made, is occasionally that
10:32:36 some of these projects will show in the negative in a
10:32:40 certain line item because the financial system
10:32:42 automatically charges these kinds of projects, and so
10:32:45 sometimes we have to reverse those charges manually.
10:32:47 And that has happened from time to time.
10:32:50 So I just wanted to let you know this is an ongoing
10:32:52 program, and it is consistent with grant guidelines
10:32:56 and other jurisdictions.
10:32:58 Any questions?
10:33:00 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you.
10:33:00 I had an opportunity to speak with Ms. Wise about this
10:33:03 earlier this week and she said they are actually doing
10:33:05 a study now to take a look to make sure that this 1.5
10:33:10 that's being charged is the right number, that we are
10:33:13 not overcharging or undercharging to do this.
10:33:16 Administrative supervision.

10:33:18 So, I mean, it's just the reality that we have to pay
10:33:21 for administration.
10:33:29 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank Ms. Wise for doing that study.
10:33:35 >>THOMAS SCOTT: All in favor?
10:33:38 Opposes?
10:33:39 Okay.
10:33:39 Item 82.
10:33:40 Item 82.
10:33:41 This is the letter I guess you all voted on last week.
10:33:44 Two weeks ago when I wasn't here.
10:33:46 >>GWEN MILLER: We didn't vote.
10:33:55 We carried it over.
10:33:55 We want add full council.
10:33:57 >> Well, my concern is, and I talked to legal about
10:34:00 this, and first of all, we are going to send a letter
10:34:03 out from council to the grocery stores, asking them
10:34:08 and gas stations I guess not to sell within certain
10:34:12 geographical areas on a volunteer basis.
10:34:15 Is that right?
10:34:15 And it's my understanding that from a legal standpoint
10:34:20 they are not violating any ordinance.
10:34:22 They have a right.

10:34:24 We are asking them to do something that they have a
10:34:26 legal right to do.
10:34:27 And the other problem I have is you are asking the
10:34:31 chairman to send it along with his signature.
10:34:35 And that's a big objection.
10:34:38 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: That's why the six of us put you
10:34:41 as chairman.
10:34:42 [ Laughter ]
10:34:47 But let me say this.
10:34:48 You know, things have to be done.
10:34:51 And for the first time in a long time I saw consensus
10:34:54 in this chamber from various groups that had been
10:34:58 absent for a long time, from the neighborhood, from
10:35:00 the Krewe, from participants, from 501(c)3 nonprofits,
10:35:06 and this is way got out of it.
10:35:07 Participants in the Krewe, they can participate on a
10:35:12 voluntary Port-o-Let program which allows the
10:35:14 merchants to order a Port-o-Let at the Krewe's
10:35:16 discounted rate of one half the normal rate.
10:35:19 That's about 75 bucks.
10:35:21 And the Krewe would add their address to the delivery
10:35:25 schedule.

10:35:25 In other words you get with the Krewe.
10:35:27 You order it.
10:35:27 You get a discount to have and facilitate around your
10:35:31 business.
10:35:31 So what's been happening in the past won't happen in
10:35:34 the future.
10:35:35 Possibly.
10:35:37 Strict enforcement of underage sales.
10:35:40 And if you look at the recent Guavaween, I forgot
10:35:47 where it was is the or 20 or so that were arrested for
10:35:50 underage drinking.
10:35:51 And I think it has to be enforced very strictly.
10:35:54 And the Krewe as I understand it has -- will post
10:36:01 responsible drinking signs, and I believe this and the
10:36:08 arrests if there are clear violations.
10:36:09 I'm also protecting the neighborhood.
10:36:11 I'm all for doing what they say we do but we have to
10:36:15 understand that it's not only in that one sector of
10:36:18 the city that this thing happens.
10:36:19 There are other sectors in the city.
10:36:21 And I don't know why district 6 is blessed with most
10:36:25 of these problems but we are.

10:36:26 And when you look at stadium events or events at a
10:36:30 stadium -- and I won't mention any stadium -- you will
10:36:32 find that there is equal to or greater than the amount
10:36:36 of the problems that we had during that one event, or
10:36:40 that one day, in the wonderful city of Tampa, Florida,
10:36:43 where individuals could come and enjoy themselves
10:36:46 without having a lot of money in their pocket.
10:36:49 I remember when I was a young man -- well, that was
10:36:54 before Gasparilla.
10:36:55 But you can see things that happened that you were
10:37:00 coming in and watching these beautiful floats, and I
10:37:02 used to look at the girls and I would say, Wow.
10:37:07 I'm adjusts telling you the truth, Mr. Caetano. You
10:37:09 don't remember that because of your age.
10:37:11 But yeah I'm saying is these things are a joy, and the
10:37:15 people that come in to Tampa really appreciate and
10:37:18 understand what a wonderful city we have.
10:37:20 Is it a burden on people?
10:37:22 Yes, it is.
10:37:22 But it's a burden on people in a lot of areas.
10:37:27 The areas of somewhere in West Tampa, again not to
10:37:30 mention specifically anything, was inundated with big

10:37:34 crowds, when there are different events.
10:37:37 Some crowds now for ought games because they have lost
10:37:43 on two continents and they are luck toy play in Asia.
10:37:46 But after these things are said and done, you will see
10:37:50 that the city wants to be futuristic in what it needs.
10:37:54 And these events are what makes the city a great place
10:37:56 to live.
10:37:57 All of us have to participate.
10:38:00 But at the same time all of us have to be respectful
10:38:03 of the neighbors in which these events are being held.
10:38:07 Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
10:38:08 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Councilman Dingfelder.
10:38:10 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
10:38:14 It's amazing.
10:38:15 You mention Gasparilla, and all heck breaks loose.
10:38:19 Let me clarify a couple of things because there's a
10:38:21 lot of confusion out there.
10:38:24 For one, I love Gasparilla.
10:38:26 I have been going to Gasparilla since the late 50s
10:38:30 as a little boy, and all through the 60s and even
10:38:33 all the way to now.
10:38:34 And I still go to Gasparilla and I love it.

10:38:37 There's just something about hearing the bands, and
10:38:39 all the excitement and the cannons going off.
10:38:46 I want that to continue forever.
10:38:48 But at the same time, our residents in Hyde Park and
10:38:52 Soho have been tremendously burdened with this, and
10:38:55 the whole was getting out of control.
10:38:57 And if you don't believe it, I think those pictures
10:38:59 and videos are still open Facebook.
10:39:02 And it's not pretty.
10:39:04 So I think there is a general conclusion, it wasn't my
10:39:08 conclusion, it's the neighborhood's conclusion, that
10:39:11 we have too much alcohol going on in Gasparilla.
10:39:13 The only thing I suggested -- and frankly, I want to
10:39:17 commend our staff, our TPD, and the folks who run
10:39:21 Gasparilla, and many of them are here today.
10:39:24 I want to commend them on responding to last year's
10:39:27 problem.
10:39:27 And you put together a good program and I hope it
10:39:29 works.
10:39:29 The only thing I wanted to add to the possibility in
10:39:33 this motion that was pending, carried over from three
10:39:38 weeks ago, was the fact that maybe on a voluntary

10:39:40 basis, on a voluntary basis, okay, that some of those
10:39:44 stores like the two big Publixes that are in the
10:39:47 neighborhood, and the Sweetbay and maybe some of the
10:39:50 smaller stores -- although I know it's harder for
10:39:54 smaller stores, that they might voluntarily curtail
10:39:57 the sale of beer and wine for like a six-hour window
10:40:00 before Gasparilla starts and during Gasparilla.
10:40:02 I think that could cut down on the sale of people who
10:40:06 want to take that beer and wine and haul it through
10:40:08 the streets and drink it along the streets, and go to
10:40:11 the parade and go back into the streets and drink it
10:40:13 again in the alleys and that sort of thing.
10:40:15 That's what happens.
10:40:16 They do it.
10:40:17 And no matter how many officers we have, we can't stop
10:40:21 that.
10:40:22 So my suggestion is maybe we can bring it down a
10:40:25 little bit if they would voluntarily reduce it.
10:40:30 Mr. Chairman, I hear what you are saying.
10:40:31 Think if the letter was going to go out it would go
10:40:35 out from all of us or from anybody who voted for it.
10:40:38 And I think that would be fair because I wouldn't want

10:40:40 to burden you with that.
10:40:42 But I just wanted to get a better explanation.
10:40:45 Like I said, the minute you mention Gasparilla,
10:40:48 there's all kinds of confusion that breaks out.
10:40:50 We have had all these nonprofits here today.
10:40:52 It got confused saying that this letter was somehow
10:40:55 going to stop them from making money on their beer
10:40:59 garden.
10:40:59 That's not the case.
10:41:00 So long winded but I think it's important to clarify
10:41:03 where we are today.
10:41:04 I will make a motion with some slight modification
10:41:06 that is we would send out this letter asking the
10:41:10 stores on a voluntary basis if they would consider
10:41:15 curtailing that during that period ever time.
10:41:17 We ask legal to draft it.
10:41:19 So I assume it's legally sufficient.
10:41:21 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Don't assume.
10:41:27 I take responsibility for that.
10:41:28 I did draft this letter and provided it to City
10:41:30 Council.
10:41:31 Mr. Fletcher does have concern that I believe he wants

10:41:34 to raise with it.
10:41:36 This is just for discussion purposes.
10:41:38 I labeled it a draft.
10:41:40 Mr. Fletcher, do you want to?
10:41:43 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: I don't have any legal objection
10:41:45 to sending out a letter.
10:41:46 I just got the draft that Marty prepared this morning.
10:41:48 And I would just add that we make it more clear that
10:41:51 it's voluntary, and this is not related to any type of
10:41:54 enforcement.
10:41:54 So adding an additional paragraph I would recommend
10:41:58 adding it at the end.
10:41:59 >> Well, my discussion with Mr. Robbins, they want to
10:42:05 see a more proactive kind of letter go out, pretty
10:42:08 much what you were stating, all the different
10:42:12 Port-o-Lets have been added, and that we encourage
10:42:19 them to support that, and as well to adhere to all of
10:42:21 the legal signs, I guess, underage drinking.
10:42:25 That's more proactive versus saying don't sell it at
10:42:28 all.
10:42:28 Because you are saying to businesses, which is
10:42:30 quote-unquote one of the peak times, don't make a

10:42:36 profit.
10:42:37 And I don't drink alcohol per se.
10:42:40 But the issue is that it's not illegal.
10:42:47 You are asking them to do something that they are not
10:42:50 going to do.
10:42:51 And then thirdly, I think the approach recommended by
10:42:53 Mr. Robbins is the more proactive.
10:42:56 As opposed to saying, you know, don't do this on a
10:43:00 voluntary basis.
10:43:02 Yes.
10:43:02 >>MARY MULHERN: I'm sorry, I believe this was
10:43:05 discussed.
10:43:06 And I wasn't here.
10:43:07 And I know there was a big public meeting.
10:43:10 Were you able to attend that, that Santiago Corrada
10:43:13 had?
10:43:14 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I did not.
10:43:16 There is another meeting tonight in Hyde Park Village.
10:43:18 >>MARY MULHERN: In light of that, in light of the
10:43:21 consideration, I think we should just continue this
10:43:24 till after this meeting.
10:43:26 We can hopefully hear from staff about what the

10:43:32 decisions are because I don't know if this request is
10:43:34 coming from people who just happen to live in that
10:43:36 neighborhood or if it's also coming from the
10:43:39 businesses who are already -- I think they closed
10:43:49 their doors for the day if they don't want to sell
10:43:51 beer and alcohol.
10:43:52 But particularly in light of the fact that there's a
10:43:54 meeting tonight, I think we should continue this, to
10:43:59 our next meeting.
10:44:01 And I also had a question.
10:44:04 Oh, Santiago is here.
10:44:06 I'm not sure where this recommendation is coming from.
10:44:09 Is this coming from you?
10:44:10 Or was it someone on council?
10:44:14 Is it coming from council?
10:44:19 So then my --
10:44:25 I know, this is fun, isn't it?
10:44:30 Pre-Gasparilla.
10:44:31 But my question is, this is just addressing, as I
10:44:34 think Chairman Scott has indicated, one of the
10:44:37 problems that have been brought up about the parade
10:44:41 last year, and I think that's another reason to

10:44:46 continue this, because there may be other things that
10:44:48 we might be able to do or include in this, if we are
10:44:52 going to decide to do a letter.
10:44:55 So I would like to continue it for two weeks.
10:44:57 But I would like to hear from you.
10:44:58 I think you will have other recommendations that
10:45:01 council can help with.
10:45:02 >>> Good morning.
10:45:05 Santiago Corrada, neighborhood services administrator.
10:45:08 Let me just clarify about the meeting tonight.
10:45:11 We have had a number of meetings already out in the
10:45:13 community.
10:45:14 Many of our suggestions for improvement have come out
10:45:17 of those meetings that we had a workshop on a couple
10:45:20 of weeks ago.
10:45:20 The meeting tonight is our normally prescheduled
10:45:24 pre-event meeting with the community to let them know
10:45:27 regarding road closures, new improvements, this is our
10:45:32 regularly every-year scheduled pre-event meeting.
10:45:35 So tonight is really not to discuss any more changes.
10:45:38 We already developed quite an exhaustive plan dealing
10:45:41 with a lot of the issues that came up.

10:45:46 The comment about the voluntary letter came up at our
10:45:48 workshop.
10:45:49 And I think the confusion that arose was some of the
10:45:52 not for profits and why some of them showed up was I
10:45:54 believe some comments were made, well, if we are
10:45:56 looking at the for-profits out there that sell
10:46:02 alcohol, why don't we also look at what we are doing
10:46:05 internally on the parade route with not for profits
10:46:08 selling alcohol.
10:46:10 So I think that's why the red flag came up and some of
10:46:12 those not for profits saying we are also talking about
10:46:15 the route as well, which is wet zoned, and where
10:46:18 charities sell beer.
10:46:19 So --
10:46:22 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: In fact the mayor makes that
10:46:24 decision under the current code.
10:46:25 >>> Under the current code it would come through Land
10:46:27 Development Coordination for temporary wet zoning
10:46:29 approval, yes, sir.
10:46:30 That's correct.
10:46:31 And that change came about a year ago where it was
10:46:34 moved administratively to Land Development

10:46:36 Coordination for temporary wet zones.
10:46:38 >>MARY MULHERN: Was that just for parades?
10:46:44 Or was that done as part of the whole thing?
10:46:47 I'll bet we weren't thinking about Gasparilla.
10:46:52 But I think red flags has maybe been waved for legal a
10:46:56 little bit.
10:46:57 I just think that's another reason to continue this to
10:47:00 our next meeting.
10:47:01 >>> And again thank you for the accolades for all the
10:47:08 work that's gone on.
10:47:09 We have a pretty strong plan.
10:47:11 We have to execute the plan.
10:47:12 I think rather than take real, real drastic measures,
10:47:15 let's see how things work out this year.
10:47:17 There's a lot of commitment on behalf of all of our
10:47:20 departments.
10:47:21 The Krewe, EventFest to make this a much better event
10:47:25 for the neighborhoods.
10:47:25 So I think we give it a chance and see how it works
10:47:28 out.
10:47:28 >>THOMAS SCOTT: So you are saying sending a letter
10:47:33 may not be necessary?

10:47:35 >>> It's council's prerogative.
10:47:36 I would wait to see what we do because we will be out
10:47:39 in those neighborhoods enforcing open containers, all
10:47:42 kinds of things that our Tampa Police Department has
10:47:45 committed to do in those neighborhoods, and with a
10:47:48 redeployment of Tampa police officers off of the route
10:47:51 into the neighborhoods that were seriously impacted by
10:47:53 some of the things that are on Facebook and are out on
10:47:56 YouTube.
10:47:57 >>MARY MULHERN: I'm more than willing to, because I
10:48:00 haven't been to those public meetings, and I probably
10:48:03 won't be able to go to that one tonight, I had the
10:48:07 opportunity to speak with legal and with Santiago
10:48:09 about this letter, I would be probably ready to vote
10:48:13 on it at our next meeting.
10:48:16 But I would like to hear from other council members,
10:48:21 if people are supporting the idea in general.
10:48:23 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: One of the things that came out at
10:48:28 our workshop was that Courier City has not been
10:48:33 involved in any of the conversations about Gasparilla,
10:48:36 but they are totally impacted by it particularly after
10:48:39 the parade when Soho becomes inundated with people.

10:48:43 And I think that there is going to be conversation
10:48:48 about that.
10:48:49 So perhaps it would be valuable to hear back how we
10:48:54 are going to address that, and how we are going to
10:48:57 communicate with the shop owners about their ability
10:48:59 to rent port-a-potties, and I'm really glad that Mr.
10:49:06 Dingfelder clarified what he was doing, which is not
10:49:09 Draconian it.
10:49:11 It was a suggestion to get a grip.
10:49:14 I mean, what we were all confronted with after last
10:49:17 year's Gasparilla, we needed to get a grip.
10:49:20 He worked with the community, with the people
10:49:22 involved, and I think that there is value in perhaps
10:49:25 continuing this to the next council meeting or one
10:49:29 after that to hear back how we are going to work with
10:49:31 Courier City.
10:49:32 I think this more public conversation we have about
10:49:34 how much more serious the City of Tampa is in
10:49:38 deploying resources to make sure that this is a
10:49:42 peaceful and not crazy celebration, the better it is
10:49:45 for the community, because that message a needs to get
10:49:49 out.

10:49:49 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: And a Mr. Walter Crumbley was
10:49:53 invited to tonight's meeting so he has been invited.
10:49:56 He was added to our distribution list, and we hope
10:49:58 that he will come out tonight.
10:50:00 >> Councilman Dingfelder.
10:50:02 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: You know, I think Gasparilla is
10:50:07 all about fun, it's all about cooperation, and in the
10:50:17 spirit of -- in that spirit, in the spirit of fun and
10:50:21 cooperation, and also in reliance of what Mr. Corrada
10:50:27 said, what the Gasparilla folks, the organizers and
10:50:32 crew said, I'll go ahead and withdraw the letter at
10:50:36 this time.
10:50:38 I would like to hear what the folks at the meeting had
10:50:40 to say.
10:50:43 I'm hopeful that the programs that are being
10:50:48 implemented will work and will improve the situation.
10:50:53 So we don't need to bring it to a head.
10:50:55 And I will just go ahead and withdraw that.
10:50:57 I think the discussion has been extremely helpful,
10:51:00 because the attention that it has brought to this
10:51:03 issue, I think, will make everybody more responsible
10:51:06 and more involved in these important matters.

10:51:10 And this does affect many, many neighborhoods
10:51:14 throughout the city.
10:51:14 >> Thank you very much.
10:51:16 If there is a letter, I will move that all seven of us
10:51:18 sign it.
10:51:20 [ Laughter ]
10:51:21 Thank you.
10:51:25 Okay, thank you very much.
10:51:26 >>MARY MULHERN: I kind of made a motion to continue
10:51:29 it but I'll withdraw my motion.
10:51:31 >> Okay.
10:51:35 Item 83.
10:51:36 >>> Mr. Chairman, there was a second part to that item
10:51:47 82.
10:51:47 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I didn't see it.
10:51:48 >>> Santiago Corrada, neighborhood services director.
10:51:54 There was a second part regarding the financial
10:51:56 structure of the Gasparilla events, the children's
10:52:00 parade and the pirate invasion and parade.
10:52:02 And I want to introduce Mr. Darrell Stephani, the
10:52:06 president of EventFest, to speak from the organizers
10:52:09 side.

10:52:10 And then if there's any questions regarding the city
10:52:12 side I will be glad to answer those.
10:52:13 >>> Thank you, Santiago. Council, Darrell Stephani,
10:52:20 EventFest, Cass Street, suite 110.
10:52:25 I understand after our workshop finished a couple
10:52:27 weeks ago there was a question that came up about the
10:52:29 financial structure.
10:52:30 I tried to reach back to you.
10:52:32 I didn't get a chance to discuss or try to find out
10:52:34 exactly what you were questioning.
10:52:36 But first of all I want to thank council and the City
10:52:40 of Tampa, who is one of our contributing in-kind
10:52:46 contributors.
10:52:46 The Gasparilla event has been going on since 1904.
10:52:51 Currently the budget that I have some control over is
10:52:55 about $3.3 million.
10:52:58 That includes in-kind contributions by our sponsors
10:53:04 that may provide a service, advertising, such as Clear
10:53:07 Channel radio, the "The Tampa Tribune" are great
10:53:09 sponsors, have been with us for quite some time.
10:53:12 It certainly includes Ye Mystic Krewe of Gasparilla
10:53:16 which we wouldn't be doing Gasparilla without their

10:53:18 support and their financial help that they do each and
10:53:20 every year.
10:53:22 Certainly, the City of Tampa provides in-kind services
10:53:25 to the event, clean-up and obviously some of the
10:53:28 security, some of the neighborhood security,
10:53:31 et cetera.
10:53:32 So all of our sponsors for Gasparilla are very, very
10:53:36 important.
10:53:36 Gasparilla is an event that has the budget that I
10:53:42 mentioned but it doesn't make money every year.
10:53:44 In fact if you look at it, it actually loses money if
10:53:48 you look at it from a standpoint of profit-loss.
10:53:51 I'm very proud to stand in front of you today to say
10:53:53 that I have had a role in this for a number of years.
10:53:56 Ye Mystic Krewe of Gasparilla is my client.
10:53:59 And I'm honored to have the role that I have.
10:54:02 But I'm extremely honored that in all the years I have
10:54:05 ever been associated with Gasparilla, the Krewe of
10:54:08 Gasparilla has asked one thing of us -- make it
10:54:12 better.
10:54:13 Make the event better than it was last year.
10:54:16 And we have trade to do that.

10:54:18 We have grown the event.
10:54:19 We have added the children's Gasparilla extravaganza
10:54:24 which has been borne out of the growth and the success
10:54:28 of the Gasparilla pirate fest event that has been
10:54:31 historic invasion parade day event as you know. So it
10:54:37 has continued to be funded by private dollars.
10:54:39 We are so grateful for the sponsors, and we certainly
10:54:42 would always ask council to do what you can do to
10:54:45 recognize the sponsors.
10:54:47 McDonald's is our title sponsor of the children's
10:54:50 Gasparilla parade this year.
10:54:51 Kaspers does great things in this community.
10:54:53 We are so grateful they have stepped up to be a title
10:54:56 sponsor and keep that element or that part of
10:54:58 Gasparilla moving ahead.
10:55:00 We have some other announcements on spore sonship that
10:55:02 will be coming out in the next couple of weeks.
10:55:04 But it takes some dollars to put on free events.
10:55:09 I told one of our media questionnaires a couple weeks
10:55:13 ago, the free events are not free.
10:55:15 And I don't mean that just in passing.
10:55:21 Large community events take some resources for sounds

10:55:26 and stage and entertainment, for the floats, for the
10:55:28 beads, et cetera.
10:55:30 So it is a major, major business.
10:55:32 It is now something that is an event, the three
10:55:34 events, the children's Gasparilla parade, the
10:55:36 Gasparilla PirateFest, and the Gasparilla Voyage, are
10:55:40 events that we work on year round.
10:55:42 And it's a great community celebration, has been long
10:55:45 before I ever got involved with it, and we are proud
10:55:48 of what we have been able to add to it and the way we
10:55:50 have been able to grow it.
10:55:52 We certainly are not proud of the behavior of some in
10:55:54 the neighborhood.
10:55:55 We have talked an awful lot about the behaviors of a
10:55:58 few hundred people.
10:56:00 And lie forward to police and city staff that we have
10:56:03 worked with, countless hours this year, in addressing
10:56:07 some of those irresponsible behaviors, because
10:56:09 Gasparilla is a great event.
10:56:10 We talk too much about the behaviors of a couple
10:56:13 people that appear on YouTube or something being an
10:56:16 idiot.

10:56:17 Gasparilla is not a license to be an idiot in this
10:56:19 town, never has been, and it won't be.
10:56:21 So we are excited that that's going to be dealt with.
10:56:24 We are not particularly excited that somebody may get
10:56:26 arrested from it and have that stain on their record.
10:56:28 But as a community, we need to respect others.
10:56:33 We need to respect the property of people that are
10:56:36 surrounding an event site, whether it be at the same,
10:56:40 as councilman Miranda mentions or if it's down on
10:56:42 Bayshore Boulevard.
10:56:44 Gasparilla accounts for a $46 million impact to
10:56:48 Hillsborough County as the 2007 research pointed out.
10:56:53 We are exceedingly proud of that as I know the Krewe
10:56:55 of Gasparilla and all the sponsors are.
10:56:58 And we are looking forward to doing it again in 2010
10:57:01 and making it the best Gasparilla yet.
10:57:03 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Thank you, Darrell.
10:57:07 >> Any other questions?
10:57:09 Okay.
10:57:11 No other questions.
10:57:11 Thank you very much.
10:57:12 Let's take up item 91.

10:57:14 I think this requires a vote on item 91 so we can get
10:57:21 those persons out of here.
10:57:22 That was a motion, that was a zoning hearing, as I
10:57:25 understand.
10:57:27 Is that right, Mr. Shelby?
10:57:29 It was a zoning hearing?
10:57:31 And I reviewed the documentation from that.
10:57:35 However, I have to disclose on the record that I had
10:57:39 conversation with Mr. Nuckles on Monday relative to
10:57:43 this issue.
10:57:44 And I did not know that it was coming before council,
10:57:48 had been before counseling as a zoning issue.
10:57:51 And his request was my support of this item with the
10:57:55 understanding that this was CDBG funding dollars.
10:58:00 Well, in reviewing this, there's two components.
10:58:03 One is the zoning part of it.
10:58:04 The other part is they are getting CBDG funding as I
10:58:09 understand.
10:58:10 You have to separate the two.
10:58:12 And I was kind of misled in terms as to the zoning
10:58:16 issue.
10:58:17 There is a component, there is funding.

10:58:19 This is the zoning issue.
10:58:21 And there are those who are opposed to this item so I
10:58:27 am not going to support that because of that.
10:58:29 However, I can support the CDBG funding in terms of --
10:58:45 we need to come back.
10:58:48 Councilman?
10:58:49 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Mr. Chairman, if I can.
10:58:53 Let me see just if there is anybody who wishes to
10:58:56 address the subject of this ex parte communication.
10:58:59 Can I see by show of hands if anybody wants to address
10:59:02 this from the audience?
10:59:03 I see nobody.
10:59:05 So, Mr. Chairman, with that disclosure --
10:59:08 Well, generally I don't talk with anyone about zoning
10:59:10 issues, and that's just a practice I carried over from
10:59:14 coming from the county commission.
10:59:17 You stay on the safe side.
10:59:19 So he Rayed that issue at a meeting we had on Monday
10:59:22 morning.
10:59:22 And I did not know it was a zoning issue because I was
10:59:25 out of town when you all took this up at the last
10:59:27 meeting.

10:59:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I appreciate your disclosure,
10:59:30 Mr. Chairman.
10:59:30 That's appropriate.
10:59:31 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I have a question on the motion.
10:59:33 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I want to make an inquiry.
10:59:35 You did also state you had an opportunity to review
10:59:38 the record.
10:59:38 >> Yes.
10:59:39 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Ms. Mulhern, you were also not
10:59:42 present.
10:59:43 Are you prepared to vote today as well?
10:59:44 >>MARY MULHERN: (off microphone)
10:59:56 >>MARTIN SHELBY: The public hearing is closed.
11:00:00 And if you had an opportunity to review the record, if
11:00:04 you are prepared to vote then we should go forward.
11:00:06 If you are not prepared to vote --
11:00:08 >>MARY MULHERN: I have to say that I am not prepared
11:00:10 to vote for this.
11:00:11 Because I have not had the opportunity to review the
11:00:14 record.
11:00:15 And I'm very sorry to have to say that.
11:00:23 If there's still the request for a full council.

11:00:28 >>MARTIN SHELBY: It would be my suggestion that
11:00:29 council --
11:00:30 >>MARY MULHERN: Or we could come back later.
11:00:32 I could review it over lunch if that would be better.
11:00:35 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Do it this afternoon.
11:00:36 >>THOMAS SCOTT: I'll be late coming back.
11:00:40 I won't be back till probably after two.
11:00:42 >>MARY MULHERN: I'll be here all afternoon.
11:00:45 So we could all a be here.
11:00:46 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Well, my suggestion --
11:00:50 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I'll be here next week.
11:00:51 >>MARTIN SHELBY: If you want to set it for the
11:00:55 evening meeting of the 12th, for just the vote, that
11:00:57 could be appropriate.
11:00:58 That would be appropriate to do that.
11:01:00 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay.
11:01:05 Do we need to ask the applicant?
11:01:08 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Well, actually, under council's
11:01:10 rules, it could be continued till the next time that
11:01:13 council is fully here.
11:01:14 So --
11:01:17 >>MARY MULHERN: I'll move to continue.

11:01:19 >>MARTIN SHELBY: If you wish to make it the first
11:01:21 item at 6 p.m. on the 12th of November?
11:01:26 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Second.
11:01:27 >> Moved by Councilwoman Saul-Sena, seconded by
11:01:31 councilman Dingfelder.
11:01:34 All in favor?
11:01:34 Opposes?
11:01:35 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Thank you very much.
11:01:36 >>THOMAS SCOTT: We move to item 83.
11:01:38 And Chip Fletcher, this is regarding the hearing
11:01:43 officer process, which I requested that he distribute
11:01:50 that information to council early on.
11:01:53 Mr. Fletcher?
11:01:54 Somebody from his office is here?
11:01:55 Anybody?
11:01:56 Let's move on to item 84.
11:02:04 Item 84.
11:02:04 >>GWEN MILLER: Need to receive and file it.
11:02:10 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Mr. Chairman, I would like to move
11:02:12 that we put this on our agenda in 30 days, so December
11:02:17 3rd.
11:02:18 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Second on item 84.

11:02:20 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Moved and seconded.
11:02:23 All in favor?
11:02:24 Opposes?
11:02:24 Okay.
11:02:25 Item 85.
11:02:26 >>> Robin McKenney, legal department, here to
11:02:39 present with you the ordinance language that you
11:02:40 requested at the October 1st meeting regarding an
11:02:42 amendment to the human rights ordinance to add gender
11:02:45 identity or expression of protected class.
11:02:47 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
11:02:55 Here again, the ramifications of this, I don't really
11:02:59 quite gather.
11:03:00 If it's an individual that she wants to be a he or she
11:03:05 wants to be a he, whatever you have to do I have no
11:03:07 problem with it.
11:03:08 But if it's an individual that's not going to do that,
11:03:10 and if it's an individual that's going to sit in a
11:03:13 workplace in this city, and today it's a he and
11:03:15 tomorrow it's a she, then I do have a problem with it.
11:03:19 In other words, the dress or whatever.
11:03:23 So which way are we doing this?

11:03:25 >>> Councilman Miranda, the purpose of the ordinance
11:03:29 change is to add this protection for individuals who
11:03:34 are making the gender transition from one gender to
11:03:38 another gender.
11:03:39 >> That's fine.
11:03:40 I agree with that.
11:03:41 However, when you say the gender transition, is that
11:03:43 on a daily basis or for life?
11:03:47 >> Well with, it's a life transition.
11:03:48 >> Then I have no problem with it but I don't want
11:03:51 somebody to be Tom and tomorrow be Teresa on an
11:03:55 ongoing base nice city government.
11:03:57 >>THOMAS SCOTT: So the issue pretty much addresses,
11:04:01 so I can be clear, the issue is to address
11:04:03 discrimination and not afford the person to be cross
11:04:07 dressing, as I understand.
11:04:09 The issue is discrimination.
11:04:11 >>> The issue is discrimination.
11:04:14 This is the human rights ordinance.
11:04:16 >>THOMAS SCOTT: I understand that.
11:04:17 I want to know is this issue relative to
11:04:19 discrimination?

11:04:20 Is this issue but discrimination?
11:04:22 Make sure that no persons in the City of Tampa are
11:04:25 discriminated against.
11:04:28 >>> Yes.
11:04:29 The purpose of this ordinance --
11:04:31 >> According to race, sex, gender discrimination.
11:04:34 >>> That's correct.
11:04:35 >> I want to make sure of that.
11:04:36 >>> Discrimination protection ordinance.
11:04:38 >> And that's the same question he raised.
11:04:41 He just asked it in a different way.
11:04:43 Councilman Dingfelder.
11:04:44 Then Councilwoman.
11:04:46 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
11:04:53 I think it's clear, and Mr. Chairman said it and I
11:04:57 think Mr. Miranda said it, the government's role is to
11:04:59 ensure there's no discrimination against anybody,
11:05:02 whether or not they are Tom, Teresa, back and forth,
11:05:04 or what have you.
11:05:06 And that's what this ordinance does.
11:05:11 We already have this ordinance on the books to protect
11:05:14 everybody else, as to race, emergency, sexual

11:05:18 orientation, that sort of thing.
11:05:20 But this one takes it a little bit further, tone sure
11:05:24 that there are human rights for everybody.
11:05:27 Therefore, I'll be glad to read and move the
11:05:30 ordinance.
11:05:30 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Second.
11:05:31 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Move an ordinance of the city of
11:05:35 Tampa, Florida amending chapter is the of the City of
11:05:36 Tampa code amending section 12-2 by adding a new
11:05:40 definition for gender identity or expression amending
11:05:42 section 12-16 (2) purpose amending section 12-226
11:05:48 unlawful employment practices, amending section 12-36,
11:05:52 amending section 12-62-2, purpose: Amending section
11:05:57 12-64, unlawful practices, amending section 12-66-C,
11:06:02 exemptions, amending section 12-oh 71-2, purpose,
11:06:07 amending section 12-81, sale or rental, amending
11:06:10 section is the-83.
11:06:12 Residential real estate related transaction ass.
11:06:16 Amending section 12-846789 brokerage services amending
11:06:19 section 12-10-E.
11:06:22 Housing, and amending section 12-101-G housing by
11:06:27 adding gender identity or expression as a protected

11:06:29 class to these sections, providing for severability,
11:06:32 providing for repeal of all ordinances in conflict,
11:06:35 providing an effective date.
11:06:36 And the last thing I want to do is thank the members
11:06:38 of the human rights commission, the city human rights
11:06:43 commission that patiently put this together, and been
11:06:46 waiting all day for us to get to this issue.
11:06:48 And I also want to commend I think Blue Cross Blue
11:06:51 Shield folks as a corporate entity to have the courage
11:06:56 to step forward and support this important ordinance.
11:07:00 Thank you.
11:07:00 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Again I just want to be perfectly
11:07:04 clear because this vote is for a long time.
11:07:10 I'm not looking to see that same person change over
11:07:14 and change back on a daily basis.
11:07:16 If they so choose to, if they want to make their
11:07:19 change permanent, I have nothing to do but help them
11:07:23 out and see their psychiatric problems are that was
11:07:27 addressed earlier.
11:07:31 I believe that's what he said.
11:07:32 So on that part I have no problem.
11:07:34 I would have a problem that today I'm Charlie and

11:07:38 tomorrow I'm Charlene.
11:07:40 That I would have a problem because that creates an
11:07:42 enormous pressure on the workplace wherever you are
11:07:44 at.
11:07:45 >>> If I understand your question, I believe it is.
11:07:51 Does this language specifically address what you
11:07:55 describe as cross dressing?
11:07:56 It does not address that.
11:07:58 It addresses the term gender identity or expression as
11:08:03 defined as gender-related identity, appearance,
11:08:07 expression, or behavior of an individual regardless of
11:08:09 the individual's assigned sex at birth.
11:08:13 That's the definition.
11:08:14 And that would be the legal standard by which any
11:08:18 questions would be measured.
11:08:19 So it would be up to a judge if it came up or
11:08:24 something like that to determine how that conduct fits
11:08:28 under that definition.
11:08:29 But the purpose of us coming before you today to amend
11:08:32 the ordinance is to protect those individuals who are
11:08:35 subject to discrimination because they are undergoing
11:08:39 a transition from one gender to the other.

11:08:41 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I believe what you said is
11:08:47 correct, that they are in transition themselves, I
11:08:49 have no problems.
11:08:50 But I just don't want disruption of the workplace.
11:08:52 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Councilwoman Saul-Sena.
11:08:54 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
11:08:56 I'm very proud of the human rights commission in the
11:08:59 City of Tampa for considering an ordinance which is
11:09:02 seeking to combat discrimination.
11:09:04 I recognize that passage of an ordinance is different
11:09:07 from rooting prejudice out of people's hearts.
11:09:10 That takes a little longer.
11:09:12 But it's a first step and I'm pleased that we are
11:09:14 considering this today.
11:09:15 And I have in my lifetime seen a number of prejudices
11:09:21 fall wayside as we as a community and country become
11:09:25 broader minded and I'm really encouraged by this.
11:09:28 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: Ma'am, did you mention that
11:09:32 cross dressing is not covered in this?
11:09:39 >>> Cross dressing as I understand it is when an
11:09:41 individual wears the clothing of the other gender.
11:09:47 An argument could be made that that falls under this

11:09:50 definition.
11:09:53 But the purpose of it is to protect individuals who
11:09:57 are making that transition, and they are typically
11:10:00 under the supervision of a medical person when they
11:10:02 are doing so.
11:10:06 If it were the desire of council to narrow the
11:10:09 definition some way could be done.
11:10:12 So the language as it stands today is the language
11:10:17 that is typically used in these situations.
11:10:21 It would be up to a court or deciding entity to
11:10:24 determine exactly which conduct is covered.
11:10:28 I'm trying to answer your question.
11:10:29 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: Well, I cannot support this the
11:10:33 way it is, ma'am, for the simple fact if a gentleman
11:10:35 dresses up as a woman, does he have a right to go into
11:10:38 a lady's room?
11:10:40 A lady's restroom?
11:10:44 I think this is going to present a lot of problems.
11:10:46 It's going to keep the judges very, very busy.
11:10:49 That's my opinion.
11:10:49 >>> I'm sorry?
11:10:54 >> If you can spell this out definitely, then I can

11:10:57 support it but I cannot support it the way it is.
11:10:59 It's going to be legal problems after legal and we
11:11:02 have enough problems.
11:11:03 >>> It is a difficult issue to address, I understand.
11:11:07 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: City attorney.
11:11:13 I think what I am hearing from council and what Ms.
11:11:17 McKinney is trying to describe is the intent, for
11:11:20 the record, the intent of this ordinance would be to
11:11:23 protect those individuals who are making a gender
11:11:26 transition.
11:11:27 It is not the intent to cover folks that choose on
11:11:31 occasion to dress in the other gender's clothing.
11:11:34 And if you would like between first and second reading
11:11:37 we can certainly make that clarification.
11:11:39 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: Yes.
11:11:42 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: Because I think it's very clear
11:11:44 that's what we are trying to do here.
11:11:45 Personally, my opinion is that it's not necessary,
11:11:48 that it's covered the way it is drafted today.
11:11:50 But if council's preference is to make that change
11:11:53 between first and second reading we can attempt to do
11:11:56 that.

11:11:57 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Councilwoman Mulhern.
11:11:59 >>MARY MULHERN: I just want to support the ordinance
11:12:02 as it is, and say that years ago, three of your --
11:12:08 your three city-wide City Council people might not be
11:12:12 women, and we might not be able to wear suits that
11:12:17 look like men's.
11:12:18 So I wish that they would make women's suits more like
11:12:21 men's suits.
11:12:22 I think that this is not a worry about cross dressing.
11:12:27 It's not a big problem for a workplace.
11:12:30 I think that I wouldn't worry about that here.
11:12:34 And adds a little interest to the day.
11:12:40 Especially if someone on this council -- I don't mean
11:12:44 to make light of it.
11:12:46 I think our Constitution starts with the fact that we
11:12:49 hold the truth to be self-evident that all men are
11:12:52 created equal, and that includes women, and people of
11:12:55 every gender, with whatever gender identity.
11:12:59 So I think that this is an excellent ordinance.
11:13:04 I thank not just the human rights council but also our
11:13:07 attorney who worked so hard on this.
11:13:10 And I think it does make Tampa be one of those

11:13:14 progressive cities where everyone wants to live.
11:13:16 And it also -- we saw what happened in another city
11:13:21 nearby where a great employee had to leave and find
11:13:26 another job because of a decision to have a sex change
11:13:30 operation.
11:13:30 So I'm fine with this ordinance the way it is.
11:13:34 And I don't think that we should add more
11:13:36 discrimination back into it.
11:13:38 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Mr. Fletcher, you are going to bring
11:13:52 back the amended language?
11:13:53 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I don't think that's necessary.
11:13:55 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: Just to be clear.
11:13:57 City attorney.
11:13:57 I think the way it's drafted within the definition you
11:13:59 have now, it is clear that it only covers that
11:14:02 transition from one gender to the other.
11:14:05 So I don't personally believe that it is legally
11:14:07 necessary to make that change to provide the intent
11:14:10 that has been articulated by council.
11:14:12 If council desires that comfort, we can do that.
11:14:16 That would require, I think, a motion by council for
11:14:19 to us make that change between first and second

11:14:21 reading.
11:14:22 But I don't believe it's necessary to do what council
11:14:24 has articulated you all intend to do.
11:14:27 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: I would like to make that an
11:14:32 amendment to this had motion.
11:14:32 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: If the city attorney tells us that
11:14:36 in his opinion that is not needed, the amendment would
11:14:43 be moot, I believe.
11:14:43 >> I would agree.
11:14:48 >>THOMAS SCOTT: And the issue is one of
11:14:52 discrimination.
11:14:53 That's the bigger issue.
11:14:57 We need to make sure we understand the issue is what
11:14:59 discrimination.
11:15:00 And I don't support discrimination in any form.
11:15:03 And I will say to all of us, we have laws in regard to
11:15:13 discrimination, but we do have them, and Councilwoman
11:15:16 Saul-Sena, law does not change people's hearts.
11:15:19 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: It's a start.
11:15:20 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Laws do not change people's hearts.
11:15:27 It forces people to go underground or covert with the
11:15:30 way they feel.

11:15:31 Laws are not change.
11:15:33 >>GWEN MILLER: I'm ready for the vote because I think
11:15:36 the ordinance explains everything that we want it to
11:15:38 explain.
11:15:39 And I don't think we need to make no changes to it.
11:15:42 >> There's a motion.
11:15:44 It's been moved and seconded.
11:15:45 Moved by councilman Dingfelder, seconded by
11:15:48 Councilwoman Saul-Sena.
11:15:49 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
11:15:51 Opposes?
11:15:52 >> No.
11:15:53 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Caetano voting no.
11:15:56 Second reading of the ordinance will be held November
11:15:58 19th at 9:30 a.m.
11:16:00 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Item 86.
11:16:02 Mr. Fletcher.
11:16:03 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I think that's tied to -- what is
11:16:13 it?
11:16:15 Item 89.
11:16:21 The agenda item for some reason -- in a, no, no, I'm
11:16:26 sorry, I'm sorry, I'm off.

11:16:27 >>THOMAS SCOTT: 86 has to do with the registration of
11:16:31 those properties or foreclosures.
11:16:36 >>> We have reviewed this.
11:16:40 We met with the administrative staff on the issue of
11:16:42 creating a registry for foreclosed properties.
11:16:45 We don't have any legal objections to moving forward.
11:16:48 We would recommend a few differences with what the
11:16:53 Hillsborough County ordinance has in place.
11:16:57 One, we would want to make sure that it covers all
11:16:59 foreclosed properties.
11:17:02 There is a smaller subset.
11:17:03 We believe based on our need within the city bee need
11:17:06 to include all foreclosed properties.
11:17:08 And the party doing the foreclosing would be
11:17:11 responsible for registering the vacant property.
11:17:13 That's consistent with the Hillsborough County
11:17:15 ordinance.
11:17:16 The types of things that would be clarified that need
11:17:19 to be maintained are knowing, keeping clear of trash
11:17:23 and debris, swimming pools, that's consistent with the
11:17:29 Hillsborough County ordinance, and we would create a
11:17:30 period of time probably 60 days in which these

11:17:32 properties would be registered, and the other
11:17:35 additional pieces we would want to make sure that the
11:17:39 ordinance provides the authority to contract with the
11:17:44 private party to do this, if the administration
11:17:47 determines that's the appropriate way to manage the
11:17:49 workload of this additional work.
11:17:51 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Councilman Dingfelder.
11:17:53 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I commend Hillsborough County for
11:17:56 stepping forward on this.
11:17:58 And I think we should move forward on it as well with
11:18:00 great haste.
11:18:02 We all know that there is foreclosed properties out
11:18:05 there.
11:18:06 They are blighting the neighborhoods that they are in,
11:18:09 because the yards are getting overgrown, the pools
11:18:11 aren't getting maintained, et cetera.
11:18:13 And I think that this will help.
11:18:19 And it's sort of a public-private partnership to
11:18:23 address this problem.
11:18:25 The only other suggestion, I made it last time, Chip,
11:18:29 and I am going to modify it slightly, I think it
11:18:32 should probably have about a five-year sunset, just

11:18:34 so -- foreclosures are a huge issue right now.
11:18:37 But five years from now they might not be as huge an
11:18:41 issue and I would like some future council to address
11:18:44 it.
11:18:44 So that would be the only thing I would add to
11:18:46 whatever you have said already, Chip.
11:18:48 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I agree with a lot but towards the
11:18:52 end I disagree.
11:18:53 Because foreclosures are not going to end.
11:18:57 And you only stop something when you have zero.
11:18:59 You are never going to have zero crime.
11:19:01 You are never going to have zero people not speeding.
11:19:04 So therefore you must have a police force, you must
11:19:06 have enforcement of these issues.
11:19:08 And today, Hillsborough County had over 6700
11:19:12 foreclosed homes including the City of Tampa up from
11:19:15 about 1200.
11:19:17 In 2003.
11:19:19 So what we are saying, Mr. Scott, the chairman brought
11:19:22 that up and I seconded it originally, it's certainly
11:19:25 on the right track and we should certainly prevail and
11:19:28 do the same thing the county is doing just like Mr.

11:19:30 Dingfelder spoke earlier on, to make sure that the
11:19:33 neighborhoods are not drawn down by one, two, or
11:19:36 sometimes more than two, not only in the neighborhood
11:19:39 but in the single block.
11:19:41 There's where the code enforcement comes in.
11:19:45 It's easy to find out who the lenders are if you know
11:19:49 how to do it and you check it out and you start
11:19:53 sending them the monthly charge for that and do the
11:19:55 work.
11:19:56 So is it difficult?
11:19:57 No.
11:19:58 Is it time consuming?
11:19:59 Yes.
11:19:59 >> With that, I will support that, and I am going to
11:20:04 move that you bring this back, what, 30 days you can
11:20:07 do it, you think?
11:20:08 >> We can do it in 30 days, yes, sir.
11:20:09 >> In 30 days.
11:20:11 She has the gavel.
11:20:14 Let me put the motion on the floor.
11:20:15 I want to move the recommendation you made.
11:20:18 However I am not for sunsetting, Mr. Dingfelder.

11:20:21 I think that council can always bring back anything it
11:20:23 wants to at a future date.
11:20:25 As Mr. Councilman said you will always have
11:20:29 foreclosures.
11:20:29 I think this is a good program, and as well it would
11:20:31 generate some revenue for the city.
11:20:33 So I'm going to move that with those recommendations
11:20:37 changes that you made.
11:20:37 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion and second.
11:20:39 We have a question on the motion.
11:20:40 Mr. Caetano.
11:20:40 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: Mr. Fletcher, how does this
11:20:44 cover a home in a community development district where
11:20:46 you have a homeowners association that controls?
11:20:51 Do you have the right to go into a CDD or HOA and tell
11:20:56 somebody to clean up their yard?
11:20:59 >>> Generally we do, yes, sir.
11:21:01 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: You do?
11:21:03 >>> To clarify, the CDD or HOA generally has more
11:21:07 strict standards, so generally it's not an issue.
11:21:10 And the HOA or CDD will be initiating their own
11:21:13 enforcement before the city gets involved.

11:21:15 That is typical.
11:21:16 >> A lot of these community development districts are
11:21:19 underfunded, and they are maintaining that they don't
11:21:23 have the money to take care of those yards.
11:21:30 And to repair the streetlights and things like that.
11:21:32 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion and second on the
11:21:36 floor.
11:21:36 All in favor of that motion say Aye.
11:21:38 Opposed, Nay.
11:21:38 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Thank you.
11:21:43 That comes back in 30 days, right?
11:21:45 Okay.
11:21:45 Item 87.
11:21:48 This is the settlement agreement.
11:21:51 87 and 88.
11:21:52 >>JULIA COLE: Legal department.
11:21:54 Before I get started on my presentation I am going to
11:21:56 hand to the clerk a clean copy of the cheer channel
11:22:02 agreement, and a substituted version of the CBS
11:22:07 agreement with all of the attachments associated with
11:22:09 it.
11:22:10 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Julia thought she was going to

11:22:14 have ten children before this was all over.
11:22:25 >>JULIA COLE: What you have in front of you are
11:22:26 proposed settlement agreements between the City of
11:22:27 Tampa and the Clear Channel incorporated, and the City
11:22:32 of Tampa and CBS remitting to our billboard sign
11:22:36 issue, which has been ongoing for many years.
11:22:38 And I have given City Council several presentations on
11:22:41 this.
11:22:41 I probably provided you hundreds of memorandums.
11:22:44 I am not going to go through all of that information.
11:22:47 I do want to remind you that I spent as a result of
11:22:49 our last conversation a time line of what the city has
11:22:52 done in relationship to billboards, which has been
11:22:55 part of previous presentations that are given, but
11:22:57 unless there's questions I am not going to get into
11:22:59 that.
11:23:00 As of our last meeting, the legal department called
11:23:06 together a public information session W we did last
11:23:09 week in the Mascotte room in which I requested members
11:23:12 of T.H.A.N., the neighborhoods, other interested
11:23:15 parties, as well as the representatives of Clear
11:23:17 Channel and CBS, to discuss the terms and settlement

11:23:21 agreements, gave the same brief history that I have
11:23:26 gone with City Council, and put this entire issue into
11:23:29 context.
11:23:30 As a result of that meeting -- and I sent the memo out
11:23:33 to City Council on November 3rd indicating the
11:23:35 changes to the agreement, and for the record, the
11:23:38 agreement that I had handed to the clerk for CBS has
11:23:42 made the exact same concessions, so both agreements on
11:23:47 the usual you are identical, but concessions were made
11:23:49 as a result of their conversations, and I think you
11:23:51 heard from members of T.H.A.N. who were at the
11:23:53 meetings, obviously the issue of billboard is not the
11:23:57 most favored subject in the city.
11:24:00 We have billboards and we have to deal with the issues
11:24:02 we have and we have pending litigation publicly and
11:24:07 privately as toe where we stand on that litigation.
11:24:09 But quickly, the stipulations that were made and were
11:24:12 placed as part of those agreements are as follows.
11:24:17 For signs that are relocated onto what I call local
11:24:21 roads, which not state and federal highways that are
11:24:25 typically dealt with through Florida Department of
11:24:27 Transportation regulation, put in place a linear

11:24:33 separation between signs, which is the same as the one
11:24:37 for FDOT regulations on FAP roadways which is
11:24:41 currently 1,000 feet, and that is on the same side of
11:24:44 the street, not on both sides of the street.
11:24:46 I think I heard some comments.
11:24:47 I do want to clarify that issue.
11:24:51 In addition, we have amended the provision for
11:24:53 relocation of science on those local roads, as I'm
11:24:57 calling them, to -- they may not be relocated to
11:25:02 within 300 feet of residentially zoned property, as
11:25:06 measured on both sides of the street.
11:25:07 And that was a big issue that had come up through
11:25:10 these discussions, and that was a concession that was
11:25:12 made from those companies.
11:25:18 In addition we have amended the upgraded sign
11:25:20 provision.
11:25:20 We went through an entire discussion of upgraded funds
11:25:23 and I am not going to get much further into that
11:25:25 except to say what is in the agreement is intended to
11:25:27 match what we might do at some point in the future on
11:25:32 digital signs or what's in the code, the sign codes
11:25:35 today.

11:25:35 But there is a provision in there for limitations on
11:25:40 upgrades of permitted signs in the Westshore
11:25:42 commercial overlay district to -- that would only be
11:25:46 allowed, if it's allowed on this sign code for
11:25:49 specific roadways.
11:25:50 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Ms. Cole, let me just interrupt.
11:25:53 I wonder if council had any questions.
11:25:55 You all have briefed us previously, discussed this
11:25:59 issue more than one time over the last two years.
11:26:06 I guess my issue is, does council have any questions?
11:26:09 If you don't have any questions, let's get on with it.
11:26:11 >>JULIA COLE: I will just indicate that it is the
11:26:14 legal department's recommendation we go ahead and
11:26:17 approve these agreements.
11:26:18 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: One other point, there is no
11:26:23 right in these agreements for any additional
11:26:25 billboards.
11:26:26 While they do speak to digital billboards in the way
11:26:28 we described, to make sure there are no rights,
11:26:31 otherwise it does not grant any rights, and just about
11:26:35 anyway affect our discussion regarding digital
11:26:38 billboard ordinance coming down the road other than

11:26:39 the option period that we previously discussed.
11:26:41 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Councilwoman Mulhern.
11:26:46 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you, Chairman.
11:26:51 I have a couple of problems with this still.
11:26:57 Let me just start with the question.
11:26:58 On page 14, the zone after zone, the underlying
11:27:09 portion on my --
11:27:13 >>JULIA COLE: Your page 14.
11:27:15 >> Nothing shall be construed to permit technology --
11:27:20 that is one of the references to electronic signs that
11:27:23 I had asked about at the last meeting.
11:27:28 Why is that paragraph in there?
11:27:30 If electronic signs are not permitted under the code
11:27:32 now, why do we need to have this paragraph in there?
11:27:35 I just wanted to know the rationale for putting that
11:27:38 in.
11:27:38 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: Because there is reference in a
11:27:42 couple of places to the option period, to the addition
11:27:48 take that just got added in about the no electronic
11:27:53 message boards in certain areas of the Westshore
11:27:55 district.
11:27:55 We thought it was necessary to additionally emphasize

11:27:59 that any types of specific materials, or technology
11:28:04 for billboards, be controlled by city code, that you
11:28:07 all adopt legislatively, not in this settlement
11:28:11 agreement.
11:28:11 If it was silent there could potentially be an
11:28:14 ambiguity that could be used in the future even though
11:28:16 it wasn't the intent of the parties today.
11:28:23 >>MARY MULHERN: I'm okay with that then.
11:28:25 That brings up another question for me.
11:28:27 And I understand and am glad that the Westshore
11:28:30 overlay district was satisfied with this.
11:28:32 I'm glad for them.
11:28:34 But I don't understand why they should be singled out.
11:28:39 >>JULIA COLE: That was a provision that was submitted
11:28:42 to us by Clear Channel as part of their conversations
11:28:46 and discussions.
11:28:49 We, as a result of that, as Mr. Fletcher mentioned,
11:28:51 wanted to make it very clear within the confines of
11:28:53 that particular provision that this is not intended to
11:28:57 permit those types of signs, but just limitation on if
11:29:00 they are allowed where they could go, so that was
11:29:03 really something that came directly from Clear Channel

11:29:07 and their representatives, and was also agreed to by
11:29:09 CBS and has been put into the agreement with the
11:29:11 limitation that Mr. Fletcher just described.
11:29:14 >>MARY MULHERN: So is it just that section that is
11:29:18 satisfying that?
11:29:21 I have a problem with fairness here.
11:29:23 Because we are singling out one neighborhood.
11:29:26 And I agree with the idea, and I would like -- I would
11:29:33 agree with protecting that district.
11:29:34 But I think other districts need to be protected, too.
11:29:37 >>> If I may.
11:29:44 In the abstract this would be something more fitting
11:29:46 for the electronic billboard ordinance that you all
11:29:49 have workshops in the future.
11:29:51 But in the interest of expediency and getting this
11:29:53 resolved, we agree that the request of the billboards
11:29:59 to put these agreements limiting just these two
11:30:02 particular billboard companies.
11:30:03 >> Let's talk about expedience I in the 13-year
11:30:06 negotiation that's been going on or something like
11:30:08 that.
11:30:13 My request at the last meeting was that we didn't have

11:30:15 any references here.
11:30:16 The one paragraph, I think if digital billboards are
11:30:23 not allowed right now we don't need it.
11:30:25 And I also think we have got the whereases with the
11:30:30 digital billboards in there, and we have got the
11:30:32 opt-out provision, which is all a slippery slope.
11:30:37 Even though we are trying very hard -- you are, thank
11:30:40 you -- trying very hard to separate these, it's a
11:30:43 slippery slope for us.
11:30:44 And I can't support any agreement that is going to
11:30:49 potentially lead to determining a policy decision on
11:30:56 digital billboards.
11:30:57 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: Mr. Chairman, one final point on
11:31:02 this.
11:31:02 We do in our code allow digital message signs for
11:31:05 on-site signs.
11:31:06 That's why it's so important in an agreement like this
11:31:09 where we are trying to keep them separate that we are
11:31:11 making it very clear that for these billboards, with
11:31:15 the specific type of technology that's on the signs,
11:31:18 is covered in our code, not in the settlement
11:31:21 agreements.

11:31:21 We didn't want to leave open any argument that somehow
11:31:24 a billboard could take advantage of the on-site sign,
11:31:28 electronic messaging provision or other types of
11:31:30 technology standards in our code.
11:31:34 And that's why we have got these references in here.
11:31:36 And that's why we are recommending it in this form
11:31:38 here.
11:31:38 >>MARY MULHERN: I'm not sure I'm convinced of that.
11:31:43 I mean, I trust your opinion but I need to talk to you
11:31:45 further about that.
11:31:47 That's not enough for me.
11:31:48 I need some more explanation.
11:31:53 I can't approve this because I think that the safety
11:31:57 problems and the livable -- the livable city that we
11:32:04 want to be, the quality of life that we want to have
11:32:09 here, we want to be like cities that don't allow
11:32:11 digital billboards, like Los Angeles and several
11:32:13 others.
11:32:14 So I just see this agreement as kind of the top of the
11:32:21 slippery slope.
11:32:22 So I'm not ready to support it.
11:32:24 But thank you.

11:32:25 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Two quick questions for staff.
11:32:29 One is a citizen this morning brought up the issue of
11:32:33 penalties, and in fact there aren't any mentioned.
11:32:36 How come?
11:32:36 >>JULIA COLE: I don't think it's fair to say there
11:32:43 are no specific penalties within this agreement.
11:32:45 Way think she was referring to is fines, and placing
11:32:50 those in the agreement, that is not something that in
11:32:53 the times that I dealt with these -- and I have dealt
11:32:56 with these in other jurisdictions -- seen put into
11:32:59 agreements.
11:33:00 I'm not sure that is something we would receive any
11:33:02 type of agreement on the other side, because remember
11:33:04 this is a negotiated settlement.
11:33:05 What we do have in here are requirements for specific
11:33:08 performance.
11:33:09 What we do have --
11:33:11 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: What happens if they don't
11:33:12 perform?
11:33:13 >>JULIA COLE: Then we have the opportunity --
11:33:16 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: We go back to court and enforce
11:33:18 it directly.

11:33:19 Or I believe we could also go through our code
11:33:21 enforcement process as well.
11:33:23 We have those options also.
11:33:24 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: The challenge that we faced
11:33:26 historically with the billboard companies is while we
11:33:28 are negotiating, they are collecting checks every
11:33:31 month from the people who place advertising on their
11:33:34 billboards, and we have not been particularly
11:33:37 successful in getting them to do what they necessarily
11:33:41 agree to do, if it's terribly lucrative for them to do
11:33:45 what they have been doing in the past.
11:33:47 For example, Clear Channel specifically agreed many
11:33:49 years ago to take down certain signs, they took down
11:33:51 some but not others.
11:33:53 They are still there.
11:33:54 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: In that context there was no
11:33:58 final judgment from a court that we would be able to
11:34:00 go back and get fines or other action by a court.
11:34:03 We will have that in this instance.
11:34:08 The post settlement obligation in here is that they go
11:34:10 back to court and we get a final judgment from the two
11:34:13 judges in this case, so we would then have the ability

11:34:16 to directly enforce in those instances.
11:34:18 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: But the other quick question is
11:34:24 from a woman who lives in a historic district in
11:34:28 Seminole Heights, she says that in the location
11:34:31 definitions the signs, quote, must not be located
11:34:34 within a historic district.
11:34:36 But it's adjacent to I-275, and I-275 is included as
11:34:43 an acceptable location.
11:34:44 So how will that be interpreted for the people who
11:34:47 live in Seminole Heights?
11:34:49 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: In the draft ordinance that we
11:34:51 provided you, digital signs would be prohibited in all
11:34:53 historic districts.
11:34:55 In these agreements, they are prohibited on historic
11:35:01 structures.
11:35:01 >> They are allowed in a historic district?
11:35:05 >>JULIA COLE: Yes, signs can be located into a
11:35:08 historic district but not onto a property which
11:35:10 contains a historically designated structure.
11:35:14 >> But it could be next door to a historically
11:35:17 designated structure?
11:35:19 >>> That is true.

11:35:20 County be next door to a historically designated
11:35:22 structure or within a historic district in that kind
11:35:24 of proximity, but that is for the signs which are not
11:35:28 inclusive of the signs in the proposal.
11:35:33 >> I am going to turn over the gavel and move item 87
11:35:39 and 88 with the understanding from our legal that they
11:35:41 have negotiated this, and let me just say as I said a
11:35:44 few weeks ago, there is no ideal.
11:35:48 This is a settlement.
11:35:50 It means nobody is really happy but we come to a
11:35:52 compromise, and middle of the road where we get
11:35:55 something and they get something.
11:35:56 They don't get all what they want, nor do we get all
11:35:59 that we want and it's in the best interest of the
11:36:02 community.
11:36:02 So with that understanding, and I dealt with these
11:36:04 years over at the county.
11:36:05 So I am going to move item 87 and 88.
11:36:08 Based on the recommendation of our legal.
11:36:10 >> Second.
11:36:12 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion and second.
11:36:14 Question on the motion.

11:36:15 Mrs. Saul-Sena.
11:36:15 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I will not be able to support the
11:36:17 motion.
11:36:18 Not that our legal department hasn't tried.
11:36:20 But they did not receive support of the administration
11:36:22 to hire a really gunning ho specialist attorney where
11:36:27 the sign companies, trust me, have people for whom
11:36:30 this is their main focus.
11:36:32 I feel like this is in the middle of the road,
11:36:35 Mr. Chairman.
11:36:35 I feel like wear on the shoulder.
11:36:38 And I feel like our community has never been
11:36:40 beautiful.
11:36:41 We are making some strides.
11:36:42 This is not a strong a step as I would like to see us
11:36:47 take.
11:36:47 And I think if we were to reject this, there's the
11:36:52 possibility that we could come up with something that
11:36:54 is stronger.
11:36:55 So therefore I won't be supporting this ordinance.
11:36:57 >>MARY MULHERN: I already said most of way needed to
11:37:01 say.

11:37:01 But I just want to point out that there are entire
11:37:04 states that don't even allow billboards.
11:37:06 And we are talking about a decision that might affect
11:37:11 us having perhaps some more than we have right now,
11:37:17 and with having the digital billboards, which, by the
11:37:21 way, I don't know any man who can drive by a digital
11:37:25 billboard without looking at it.
11:37:27 I can't get my husband's attention if he's watching
11:37:29 TV, or my son who -- it's just a genetic problem.
11:37:37 So television screens all over the size of the road is
11:37:40 really scary.
11:37:40 And I do feel like there's enough -- there are outs in
11:37:49 this agreement for Clear Channel if we don't adopt the
11:37:52 digital ordinance.
11:37:53 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Dingfelder.
11:37:58 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Thank you, Madam Chair.
11:38:01 It's my understanding this litigation has been around
11:38:04 for five or more years, at least.
11:38:06 And this is to resolve -- this is to resolve
11:38:11 litigation, okay.
11:38:12 This is not about the digital ordinance.
11:38:15 There is nothing in this settlement agreement that

11:38:18 allows digital billboards.
11:38:22 And I made that abundantly clear four months ago
11:38:25 because I said, I'm not going to participate in any
11:38:28 settlement agreement that includes the digital
11:38:30 billboards.
11:38:31 That's why -- and fortunately you guys and the mayor
11:38:34 agreed, and that's why it got yanked out of there.
11:38:37 We are going to deal with the digital billboards at a
11:38:40 later date, set up the workshop, the community is
11:38:42 going to have their meetings, we are all going to
11:38:44 address it, whether or not we have digital billboards
11:38:47 or we don't will be another day.
11:38:49 The only connection here is if the two companies are
11:38:54 monitoring our digital billboard ordinance, don't like
11:38:57 the way -- we are not passing water or whatever, they
11:39:02 pull out, that's fine.
11:39:03 Let them.
11:39:04 Then we'll be back in court, and I have full faith and
11:39:07 confidence in Chip and the attorneys that are working
11:39:09 for him and anybody he might hire to litigate this to
11:39:12 the fullest.
11:39:14 So I will support today's thing.

11:39:15 Let's move forward with this agreement.
11:39:18 I reviewed it thoroughly and I think eights good
11:39:20 agreement.
11:39:20 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: I was out of the room when the
11:39:23 motion was made.
11:39:24 Can I hear the motion again?
11:39:27 >> The motion is item 87 and 88, moving the
11:39:30 recommendation of our legal, the city attorney, to
11:39:32 approve the settlement agreement.
11:39:33 >>GWEN MILLER: Are you ready to vote, Mr. Caetano?
11:39:37 All in favor of the motion say Aye.
11:39:39 Opposed Nay.
11:39:40 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Saul-Sena and
11:39:44 Mulhern voting no.
11:39:45 >>GWEN MILLER: We are going to go back.
11:39:52 Ms. Palus has been waiting for awhile.
11:39:56 Item 15 and 16.
11:39:58 >>KAREN PALUS: Parks and recreation director here at
11:40:09 the request of item number 15 and 16 regarding the
11:40:13 reservation software system.
11:40:14 I understand there's some question as related to the
11:40:16 recreation contract.

11:40:19 Actually for the purposes of the reservation software
11:40:22 it's a separate situation.
11:40:23 This is the software program that goes in place for
11:40:25 all of our programming.
11:40:27 This is what I have been speaking with council about
11:40:30 as we went through the ordinance and through the fee
11:40:32 schedule.
11:40:32 This will allow for the folks that made that
11:40:35 commitment, and I'll share it with you with our
11:40:38 residents to be able to register and pay online.
11:40:40 That's what the program will allow them to do.
11:40:43 So at 4:30 in the morning, stand out in front of Kate
11:40:47 Jackson to wait to register for summer programs.
11:40:50 To allow those folks to utilize our rental and shelter
11:40:54 services to be able to go in and register either at
11:40:59 their home or within a commuter lab at one of their
11:41:03 centers versus come all the way down to our offices.
11:41:06 So this program is bigger than tennis.
11:41:08 I can speak to the specifics of the tennis instructor
11:41:11 aspect as well.
11:41:12 But the reservation system is our overall
11:41:14 accountability, allowing that customer friendly

11:41:17 service, and sharing with each of you regarding how we
11:41:20 handle reservations, how we handle online
11:41:24 registration, and services for our city as a whole.
11:41:27 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
11:41:30 And thanks for clarifying that.
11:41:32 Because I wasn't sure and had questions about it.
11:41:36 And have had questions from some other instructors and
11:41:39 people who have been using different programs.
11:41:41 So I don't feel comfortable enough at this point.
11:41:45 It seems like it might be creating more bureaucracy.
11:41:52 And it's a lot of money to spend at this point.
11:41:55 So I feel like I would just like to have more of a
11:42:01 report, maybe a public hearing, or public workshop or
11:42:06 something, where we can talk about these specific
11:42:10 changes and the ramifications for the instructors and
11:42:18 just clients, their clients.
11:42:21 So I'm not saying I can't support it.
11:42:23 I just feel lake I don't know enough about it and want
11:42:26 to hear more.
11:42:27 >>> The reservation software we are putting in place
11:42:30 is independent of the recreation instructor.
11:42:32 That is a separate entity.

11:42:35 However, what it does allow us to do is the
11:42:37 reservation software is to put those programs on that
11:42:40 system and allow for authorize registrations to occur
11:42:43 so they get live visibility for all of their programs
11:42:45 and access to it.
11:42:46 It allows for after-school programs instead of having
11:42:49 the fees collected day in and day out and the service
11:42:53 day with everything coming in, they can do that on
11:42:55 line.
11:42:55 It allows for that summer registration -- ridge
11:42:58 strayings to occur.
11:42:59 It allows for somebody who wants to have pottery
11:43:01 classes at Hyde Park at school that wants to take it
11:43:03 at Taylor, they can get on line and see that and move
11:43:06 from site to site.
11:43:07 They can move for reservations for rentals, let's say
11:43:11 they are interested in a shelter for a large event at
11:43:13 Al Lopez, they can look see it's not available on this
11:43:17 date but I can look at Lowry.
11:43:18 It allows us to talk to one another.
11:43:21 When you sign on as a family within the system you
11:43:23 will establish a recreation card in the family system.

11:43:26 So our staff no matter what site you visit in the city
11:43:30 will no they are already a rec card holder, they have
11:43:33 access to the programs and facilities.
11:43:35 Right now there is no way for our program the way we
11:43:37 are structured to talk to one another so it's very
11:43:40 un-customer friendly.
11:43:41 This gives us our folks to move throughout the city
11:43:45 seamlessly, allows them the flexibility to do what
11:43:47 they need to do at the time they need to do it to be
11:43:50 able to participate in our program, which is a
11:43:52 tremendous, tremendous accomplishment on the software
11:43:55 to be able to assist our folks in that effort.
11:43:58 It's very labor intensive currently.
11:44:00 >>MARY MULHERN: I understand that.
11:44:03 But it seems like it's interesting because the person
11:44:06 who was here this morning was doing that labor and
11:44:09 would prefer to do it the way he's doing it now.
11:44:12 And I think there are pros and cops, and I think that
11:44:18 we would like to hear more from the public on this
11:44:20 particular -- maybe not on necessarily on buying the
11:44:24 software, but on how it is going to be -- the entire
11:44:29 program is going to be instituted because it is going

11:44:31 to be changing the way that they operate, and it does
11:44:36 affect them in a pretty big way.
11:44:38 And I think especially the instructors who are relying
11:44:42 on income from this, and if they are having to wait
11:44:46 months to get paid.
11:44:47 I think there is enough here that I need to get more
11:44:50 information before I'm comfortable with it.
11:44:52 >>KAREN PALUS: Let me see if I can separate the two
11:44:55 issues for council so that you are comfortable.
11:44:58 The reservation software again is that global system,
11:45:01 and that will be in place that we need to move forward
11:45:04 to put ourselves to be able to collect appropriately
11:45:07 those fees and give our customer it is ability to
11:45:09 access it.
11:45:10 The recreation instructor would be happy to talk with
11:45:12 you more about that and share that process and that
11:45:15 program and what's involved with that.
11:45:16 I can do that this morning or I can do that at a
11:45:19 separate time with more dialogue.
11:45:20 >>MARY MULHERN: I think we need more time because
11:45:23 it's not just about one person, it's about how it's
11:45:25 going to change a lot of the programs.

11:45:26 So I would like to maybe continue this to staff report
11:45:33 at another meeting.
11:45:34 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'll second it for discussion.
11:45:40 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I think I didn't understand until
11:45:45 today the two things were different.
11:45:48 I think Mr. Dingfelder and Mr. Miranda put a visit for
11:45:52 knew 30 days at the beginning of December to
11:45:54 specifically talk about the issues that the tennis
11:45:58 instructor brought to us.
11:45:59 We weren't aware when we adopted something a little
11:46:01 while ago that Mr. Dingfelder brought up that we were
11:46:04 giving permission to change the way that things had
11:46:07 been done.
11:46:08 But the software seems like it will be make people's
11:46:14 lives easier.
11:46:15 My question, if we vote on this today, how quickly
11:46:17 will this be available to the public to use?
11:46:21 >>KAREN PALUS: Let me share with you it's been over a
11:46:24 two-year process to get this far in acquisition of the
11:46:27 software to get the right system and the right
11:46:28 services to our I.T. and our innovation technology
11:46:33 working closely with the finance folks and everybody

11:46:36 to orchestrate this, to online register and online
11:46:39 pay.
11:46:40 So -- we anticipated initially it would be in place by
11:46:45 January 1 but I made a commitment to summer folks that
11:46:47 we would be ready before summer registration so I'm
11:46:51 hoping to see something by March and April if not
11:46:53 sooner.
11:46:53 That's where our time frame S.we'll nor more as we get
11:46:57 to additional dialogue once the award has occurred.
11:47:01 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Miranda.
11:47:02 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I'm not against change and knots
11:47:05 against doing things with computers and so forth and
11:47:07 so on, but I always say anything that's man made is
11:47:10 going to break down.
11:47:11 That's number one.
11:47:12 Number two, not everyone has a computer.
11:47:16 So I firmly believe you should have a dual system in
11:47:19 where if somebody wants to do it online and wherever
11:47:24 going to play at Davis Island, they can look it up,
11:47:26 yeah, I have an opening at 1:30, you can come in and
11:47:29 pay and not be in the computer system.
11:47:30 But what I heard today is that we have become so -- or

11:47:35 becoming, not become -- becoming so stringent that we
11:47:38 are running something like the French open here that
11:47:42 you have to have a certain time to get to the court.
11:47:45 And -- the U.S. open.
11:47:51 It's not so glamorous.
11:47:52 Big but not glamorous.
11:47:54 So what I'm saying, these things should be with the
11:47:56 intent in mind that these things do break down.
11:48:01 We have a computer in the state that speak spent, I
11:48:03 don't New York City 800 million to track things in the
11:48:06 department of business professional regulation, and
11:48:09 they break down.
11:48:15 You can't justify who has what, at what time or when.
11:48:19 So you must have a backup system that works in
11:48:22 conjunction with this system so that that's why I'm
11:48:24 saying second Ms. Mulhern, when you come back I want
11:48:28 to see if will the whole plan, if this breaks down,
11:48:31 those tennis pros can certainly give their lessons and
11:48:34 certainly do what they are doing.
11:48:35 And when I look at 30 days to pay somebody back for
11:48:38 what they have done, if that's the truth what I heard
11:48:40 today, maybe when people speak to each other and not

11:48:44 face to face, sometimes there's a lot of things that
11:48:46 are not taken in due context.
11:48:51 And I really believe that no one should wait 30 days
11:48:54 for their money.
11:48:55 And I understand what you are trying to do.
11:48:56 I appreciate what you are trying to do.
11:48:58 And that's my only reason to second the motion.
11:49:01 You see, both of these combined come in.
11:49:03 If not, one day you may have a bunch of reservations
11:49:07 and nobody knows where they are going.
11:49:09 >>KAREN PALUS: Let me share a little bit the rec
11:49:17 instructor agreement and hopefully eliminate some of
11:49:19 that information that you heard earlier that's been a
11:49:21 little misconstrued.
11:49:23 What we have allowed for with our rec instructors is
11:49:27 the means to be able to have them place their invoices
11:49:30 in to be reimbursed.
11:49:32 And we can do that if they want to do it on a monthly
11:49:35 basis, if they want to do whatever the program.
11:49:38 For six weeks two. Weeks, we talked with them.
11:49:41 We have some flexibility.
11:49:42 We have been working with finances to do that.

11:49:44 We heard that from a straw instructors.
11:49:47 Since October 1, we have already received ten new
11:49:49 instructors which is exciting for us because prior to
11:49:52 the ordinance, and the fee schedule going in place, we
11:49:54 weren't able to really bring in instructors as easily
11:49:57 as weighed been before.
11:49:58 Ms. Mulhern, remember when we spoke about some of the
11:50:01 programs and things that had piano teachers or the
11:50:06 drum groups that wanted to come in.
11:50:08 We now have the ability to do that, and we see new
11:50:12 ten -- ten new instructors.
11:50:14 It allows us to see who is in our facility and who is
11:50:18 generating revenue in our facility, allows us to
11:50:20 background screen them and give them I.D. cards, so
11:50:23 woo know who is there, when they are there, and they
11:50:26 are appropriate to work with our children day in and
11:50:28 day out, the community will be able to visibly tell
11:50:31 who is an instructor and who is not within our
11:50:34 program.
11:50:34 So it's a safety and security factor, and the
11:50:37 professional standards, there's no cigar box as you
11:50:40 heard about at Ballast Point, I don't know if that's

11:50:43 city staff, if that's a private instructor.
11:50:45 I just throw $35 in a cigar box.
11:50:48 It allows people to register and sign up for classes
11:50:51 that they can have a multiple number of -- they can go
11:50:56 to 10 or 20 classes.
11:50:58 There's a lot of variety in what we have been able to
11:51:01 provide to make it very customary friendly.
11:51:04 There are some changes and some things that may be
11:51:07 difficult for folks to understand unusually but we
11:51:11 have been through IRS standard, we have been through
11:51:13 legal, make sure everybody meets the standards, and we
11:51:16 have met all those guidelines so where everything is
11:51:19 aboveboard and being handled in the most professional
11:51:22 manner out there.
11:51:22 >>MARY MULHERN: I don't feel comfortable with this,
11:51:28 because there's so many questions.
11:51:30 Everything that you are bringing up, I have more
11:51:32 questions about.
11:51:33 So I would like to just continue this so that I can
11:51:38 speak with you individually, and also for an
11:51:43 opportunity at a council meeting for the public to
11:51:47 come and weigh in on this.

11:51:49 Because you are changing the structure of how you are
11:51:51 doing this.
11:51:52 You are creating -- if we weren't doing this before,
11:51:56 you are centralizing very contractors.
11:52:02 You know, it's almost like, I don't know, you are
11:52:05 taking on a sort of educational level of bureaucracy
11:52:11 that I don't know if that's the best way for us to go.
11:52:16 And I frankly think it ends up maybe costing us more
11:52:20 in staff and not being as efficient.
11:52:24 So I know, Karen, you watched this and you have been
11:52:30 studying it but I don't feel comfortable with
11:52:32 approving it today.
11:52:33 So I hope we can get some support to continue it to, I
11:52:38 don't know, 30 days.
11:52:40 >>GWEN MILLER: Ms. Mulhern, you have to hold your
11:52:44 motion because the person who seconded it has left.
11:52:46 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I'll make a motion to support it.
11:52:49 I don't want to be rude to you but I really feel like
11:52:52 we need to get this done.
11:52:53 It's not that I don't want to revisit all the issues
11:52:56 that the tennis player brought up.
11:53:00 I think it would be appropriate to have -- we have

11:53:03 already scheduled the discussion on that.
11:53:05 And I like the flexibility that you described.
11:53:08 I don't want us to become over bureaucratized and
11:53:14 systemized, but I feel the software especially for
11:53:17 making reservations for shelters and stuff is really
11:53:20 super important.
11:53:21 >> It's very customer friendly and that was our focus
11:53:24 to make it as easy as possible for a city resident,
11:53:27 non-city resident to utilize our facilities in the
11:53:29 most efficient manner.
11:53:30 As council member mentioned, the dual systems, we will
11:53:34 always have a dual system.
11:53:36 We'll have backup documentation.
11:53:38 The instructors are communicated through that as well.
11:53:41 They'll get their sheets, get their layouts, they will
11:53:43 know their supervisors on-site, who is coming, when
11:53:46 they are coming, how many are scheduled to be there,
11:53:48 when they are scheduled to be there, do you have a new
11:53:51 class rosters?
11:53:53 It's very comprehensive so very helpful for the
11:53:56 customer, it's easy to get in there, just sign up for
11:53:59 the program they want.

11:54:00 >> The instructors want greater flexibility and I
11:54:04 don't see the down side of that.
11:54:05 >> And we'll work with them however we need to
11:54:07 accommodate them and work with them.
11:54:09 >> And have these conversations before you come back
11:54:12 in 30 days.
11:54:13 >> We have met actually with the tennis program folks
11:54:16 three times thus far.
11:54:18 We continue to have that dialogue and such.
11:54:19 And we'll continue to have that conversation.
11:54:22 We said sit down with us, share with us when your
11:54:25 registrations are key, and we'll send staff there
11:54:27 until we get the automated system we'll be there to
11:54:30 support you and make sure we can do that.
11:54:31 If it's a weekend day we have weekend staff that are
11:54:34 working.
11:54:35 So we have been very flexible with them.
11:54:36 We are open to any accommodations we can do with them
11:54:39 and work through that.
11:54:39 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion on the floor to
11:54:44 continue how long, 30 days?
11:54:47 >>MARY MULHERN: 30 days.

11:54:48 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I haven't --
11:54:52 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: My second is back.
11:54:58 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: When we implement this item, 15, 16
11:55:02 that we are about to purchase?
11:55:04 >>KAREN PALUS: As soon as we can go through that
11:55:06 process.
11:55:07 They still have to, once the company has been awarded
11:55:11 what you are doing today will go through that
11:55:13 negotiation with them and go through the process of
11:55:15 setting up our infrastructure, because everything is a
11:55:18 little different based on our facilities.
11:55:20 So ideally, like I mentioned, I would like to see
11:55:23 something ready by the March-April time frame, but
11:55:26 depending on how long it takes to get everything set
11:55:28 up, I don't have a ballpark but that's what I'm
11:55:30 shooting for is March-April.
11:55:32 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: All I would suggest, I'm willing
11:55:35 to support -- it's a give and take, Karen.
11:55:37 I'm willing to support 15 and 16 today.
11:55:39 All I would suggest is on the tennis program, which is
11:55:42 the only program that I have heard about, okay, why
11:55:46 supplement something on a temporary basis between now

11:55:48 and Martha we are just going to redo with a permanent
11:55:52 automated system?
11:55:53 I think the automated system sounds pretty neat.
11:55:55 You and I just talked about it.
11:55:57 People can maybe buy tickets to go take their lessons.
11:56:00 That might solve the problem.
11:56:02 But I hate for to us get everybody all upset, and I'm
11:56:07 not just talking about Mr. Shull, I'm talking about
11:56:11 customers, okay?
11:56:12 And I have been out there.
11:56:13 I know the tennis situation.
11:56:16 I would hope that you just don't rock that boat, get
11:56:20 that automated system in place, and I think the
11:56:23 automated system might work out.
11:56:24 It's just my request.
11:56:25 >>KAREN PALUS: I told the instructors, everybody
11:56:29 that's currently an instructor with us that, we will
11:56:31 transition them into the new system by January 1.
11:56:34 Anybody new that's coming into our new system by
11:56:38 October 1.
11:56:38 So the folks that, six months to get up and ready for
11:56:43 that January 1st, again thinking at that time that

11:56:45 we would have our automated system ready by January
11:56:48 1st.
11:56:49 I didn't anticipate that it's going to take a lot of
11:56:51 work to get everything loaded that we have in the City
11:56:53 of Tampa.
11:56:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: That's my point. If you move that
11:56:57 from January 1 to March 1, have the automated system,
11:57:00 and the existing instructors could go into the
11:57:02 automated system as opposed to going into a manual
11:57:06 system and then an automated system over a two or
11:57:08 three-month period.
11:57:09 It doesn't make any sense.
11:57:11 >>> I will be glad to talk to the instructors.
11:57:14 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion to continue item 15
11:57:15 and 16.
11:57:16 All in favor of that motion say Aye.
11:57:18 Opposed, Nay.
11:57:19 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Nay.
11:57:21 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: That was a motion to continue?
11:57:23 No, no, I don't support that.
11:57:24 I misunderstood the motion.
11:57:25 And Charlie, you did the motion to continue?

11:57:27 >>GWEN MILLER: He seconded it.
11:57:30 Ms. Mulhern made the motion.
11:57:32 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Didn't understand it.
11:57:33 I thought it was Linda's motion.
11:57:34 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Can we have a revote?
11:57:40 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I think we should -- I think Karen
11:57:45 is moving forward with a good program.
11:57:46 Karen just gave me an example when we are talking it
11:57:49 covers Kate Jackson and people want to sign up for the
11:57:52 summer day camps.
11:57:53 This is much, much bigger than tennis.
11:57:56 Give the automated system in place and let's do it
11:57:58 now.
11:58:01 So let's vote again.
11:58:03 So it's clear.
11:58:04 >>GWEN MILLER: The motion to continue item 15 and 16
11:58:08 for 30 days.
11:58:09 All in favor of the motion say Aye.
11:58:10 >>MARTIN SHELBY: There was a request for a roll call
11:58:14 vote.
11:58:14 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: No.
11:58:17 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Yes.

11:58:19 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: No.
11:58:22 >>GWEN MILLER: Yes.
11:58:24 >>MARY MULHERN: Yes.
11:58:27 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: Yes.
11:58:29 >>THE CLERK: The motion carried with Saul-Sena and
11:58:32 Dingfelder voting no.
11:58:34 And Scott being absent.
11:58:36 >>GWEN MILLER: Now we go to item -- we are going to
11:58:47 continue -- go into recess until 1:30.
11:58:50 Adjourn until 1:30.
11:58:52 (The meeting recessed at 11:59 a.m.)

(The afternoon session of the Tampa City Council
meeting was called to order.)
This file represents an unedited version of realtime
captioning which should neither be relied upon for
complete accuracy nor used as a verbatim transcript.
The original of this file was produced in all capital
letters and any variation thereto may be a result of
third party edits and software compatibility issues.
Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the
proceedings may need to hire a court reporter.

(Roll call)
01:36:22 >>VICE CHAIRMAN MILLER: I would like to read on the
01:36:23 record that Mr. Scott will be coming back but he will
01:36:25 be late getting to the meeting.
01:36:27 We are going to go back to number 85.
01:36:31 I don't see Mr. Fletcher so we will go to number 89.
01:36:34 >>REBECCA KERT: Legal department.
01:36:39 This is an ordinance amending the provision here for
01:36:42 first reading.
01:36:43 Some time ago City Council directed their staff to
01:36:45 work with the not-for-profit group, Tampa Bay public
01:36:48 lurk group, to have them voluntarily place modular
01:36:52 news rack as round the city in hopes of eliminating

01:36:54 some of the proliferation of news racks.
01:37:00 As we were progressing with that we realized your
01:37:02 ordinance as it stands today does not provide for
01:37:05 modular news racks so we amended it to have provision
01:37:08 where is they can be located and how they can be
01:37:11 affixed to the ground.
01:37:12 While we were doing that we realized your ordinance
01:37:14 has not been amended in at least 20 years, since 1989.
01:37:18 And from that, we updated the requirements so that
01:37:22 they meet the current City of Tampa standards, and
01:37:25 also reviewed it from a Constitutional perspective.
01:37:28 Based upon that, we deleted a provision which required
01:37:33 adjoining property own area approval because that
01:37:35 provision is no longer enforceable under currents case
01:37:37 law.
01:37:38 We also updated and clarified the process for when the
01:37:40 City of Tampa removes news racks that are in violation
01:37:46 of your code.
01:37:48 That provides also meets current case law.
01:37:51 We also added a provision that allows -- that provides
01:37:54 that if a violation for the news rack in and of itself
01:37:57 to be in violation of any of the standards of the

01:37:59 code, and hope that at some point we can come back and
01:38:02 amend the citation process to include this in the
01:38:05 citation process, so that we can have an option rather
01:38:08 than removal for non-emergency situations.
01:38:12 We also defined abandoned news racks which were not
01:38:15 previously defined as a news rack that is empty for
01:38:18 seven days, and that is also a violation that can be
01:38:20 subjects to either a citation or removal.
01:38:23 Based upon staff request, we removed wood as one of
01:38:28 the permissible materials, and expanded the
01:38:31 prohibition attaching news racks which previously
01:38:35 could not be attached to traffic control devices to
01:38:39 include a prohibition on attaching them to utility
01:38:41 poles and traffic signs.
01:38:44 Finally, dealing with permits, a permit is currently
01:38:47 required and has been required since at least 1989 for
01:38:51 individual news racks.
01:38:52 We did, after some discussion was staff, as well as
01:38:55 the "The Tampa Tribune," created an allowance to have
01:38:58 a mass permit for multiple news racks if they provide
01:39:01 a site plan so that the city knows where those are
01:39:04 located.

01:39:04 Those are the major changes.
01:39:05 And I'm available if you have any questions.
01:39:07 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you.
01:39:08 I agree with the last part there where you said --
01:39:13 leaving?
01:39:14 Where you addressed the system about the application
01:39:19 for permit.
01:39:20 I think that's fair.
01:39:21 I read this last night, while watching the World
01:39:25 Series.
01:39:25 Thank you, Yankees, for winning, Tampa's team, by the
01:39:29 way.
01:39:30 I say this.
01:39:30 The 48-hour, I mean, some over ambitious individual,
01:39:37 put that the way, could say that the rack was empty
01:39:40 for 48 hours, but they checked either too early in the
01:39:43 morning or too late in the afternoon, and bingo, they
01:39:45 are gone.
01:39:46 I think seven days, a provision that was suggested
01:39:49 would be a fair item.
01:39:52 >>> We agree with.
01:39:54 That and the ordinance that's before you, the

01:39:55 substitute ordinance, contains seven days, not the 48
01:39:58 hours.
01:39:58 >> I haven't had a chance to look at the sub.
01:40:00 And the insurance portion, I read through it and I
01:40:06 tried to put it in the text of a general contractor.
01:40:10 If the general contractor is covering all the
01:40:11 insurance for all the subs, and maybe, maybe not, why
01:40:15 am I going to make all those individuals who touch
01:40:17 something and put something also have insurance?
01:40:21 >> We agreed with that provision as well and that's
01:40:24 also part of the change.
01:40:25 >> All right.
01:40:27 Now the third provision, fourth provision, depends on
01:40:30 how you look at it in order, is the one that I sort of
01:40:32 agree with the city.
01:40:35 You are going to have to prove to me that it's note a
01:40:37 hindrance to someone's view, or where you have a news
01:40:42 rack now, and then you expand it to assisting, or
01:40:47 adjacent property owner, and that's a business, and
01:40:50 all of a sudden now they may or may not have ingress
01:40:52 or egress problems, without consent of that business
01:40:56 owner, even though it is on city right-of-way.

01:40:58 >>REBECCA KERT: The location requirements should
01:41:01 prevent the situation that you describe from
01:41:03 occurring.
01:41:03 But from a Constitutional standpoint it's not
01:41:05 permissible to delegate to a third party the
01:41:08 discretion to decide whether or not somebody that's
01:41:11 protected by the first amendment occurs.
01:41:14 So that is from the legal department, that would not
01:41:16 be enforceable.
01:41:17 >> So then clearing the record, the third party is the
01:41:20 individual who owns the adjacent building or rents
01:41:22 there?
01:41:22 >> Yes, that would be correct.
01:41:25 >> Thank you very much.
01:41:26 >>GWEN MILLER: Other questions from council members?
01:41:28 We will now hear from the public.
01:41:30 >>> Jim Lake, 4 the 18 San Pedro, here today as a
01:41:36 lawyer for the "The Tampa Tribune" and I want to thank
01:41:38 council first for postponing this matter to today,
01:41:41 because as the city attorney indicated we took that
01:41:44 interim several weeks to work with the city, and a
01:41:47 number of the issues that we had concerns about

01:41:49 including those Mr. Miranda just raised have been
01:41:51 addressed, and we appreciate that.
01:41:53 There's really just one area, though, that we continue
01:41:56 to have a disagreement with, and I would just like to
01:41:58 mention that briefly.
01:41:59 And that is the idea of having the permit requirement
01:42:03 for the individual news racks.
01:42:06 And we certainly appreciate the progress as we see it
01:42:09 that was made in allowing a single application for
01:42:11 multiple locations.
01:42:13 That's helpful.
01:42:14 But we still see a real difference between what the
01:42:20 ordinance was until a week ago, the proposed
01:42:21 ordinance, which is requiring a permit and a site plan
01:42:24 for modular rack, modular being the large racks like
01:42:28 we have when you are here that hold eight to ten
01:42:30 publications.
01:42:31 We have no problem with the site plan.
01:42:33 Those make sense.
01:42:34 Those are bolted to the ground and we'll certainly
01:42:36 comply with that.
01:42:37 And in fact the Tribune worked with the city and pays

01:42:40 for a lot of the costs of those modular racks.
01:42:43 But we see those as significantly different from the
01:42:46 individual free standing racks that we think requiring
01:42:50 the permit, even if it's a permit for all of those and
01:42:55 a site plan, is really unreasonable.
01:42:56 The modular racks like I say, they are costly, they
01:43:02 are costly to maintain, but we can work with that, we
01:43:04 can live with that.
01:43:05 But the individual free-standing ones, unfortunately,
01:43:08 when they are vandalized occasionally, the Tribune
01:43:12 would like the flexibility to pick that up right away,
01:43:15 move that one, bring it back to the shop and get it
01:43:17 repaired and maybe place it in a different location.
01:43:19 Certainly as Mr. Miranda suggests a rack blocks
01:43:25 somebody's driveway, that is a violation and the city
01:43:28 ought to have the authority to have that rack be
01:43:31 moved.
01:43:31 But to require a site plan every time a news rack is
01:43:34 moved, say, from one intersection to another just
01:43:38 doesn't seem to us to be a good use of the city's
01:43:40 resources and seems like a real burden for folks who
01:43:44 own a number of these racks.

01:43:46 The city attorney suggested that there are specific
01:43:50 neutral safety requirements that council might want to
01:43:54 impose, setback requirements, that can be specifically
01:43:56 applied.
01:43:57 We have no problem with those.
01:43:58 We can certainly work with those.
01:44:00 But requiring a site plan every time somebody wants to
01:44:02 put a rack at a different location doesn't seem to us
01:44:06 to be a good use of the city's resources.
01:44:09 And so we would just suggest that the site plan and
01:44:12 the permit requirement be limited to the modular news
01:44:15 racks and not news racks in general.
01:44:18 That's all I have.
01:44:19 Thank you, council.
01:44:19 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Dingfelder?
01:44:21 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Thank you.
01:44:23 It's an interesting question, Mr. Lake.
01:44:27 And council or staff can help me too on this.
01:44:32 How about the notion that you have this holistic
01:44:35 permit, and you provide an a deny dumb, or a list that
01:44:39 says, this is where they are now.
01:44:42 And if you move them, you have a month, let's say, to

01:44:46 amend that list with the city.
01:44:48 That way, it doesn't sound too burdensome.
01:44:52 Now where they are because you are filling them up
01:44:54 every night.
01:44:55 And at the same time the city can keep some track and
01:44:59 some control on where they are, because that's the
01:45:00 whole point of this ordinance, is to have a little bit
01:45:03 more control on it.
01:45:04 On these.
01:45:05 >>> Yes, sir.
01:45:06 And I would say up front that wouldn't be our first
01:45:09 choice.
01:45:10 We would like the flexibility.
01:45:11 But if it were just the form of a list I think that's
01:45:14 something the Tribune could do.
01:45:15 But the proposed language --
01:45:18 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: The good fee is there's no
01:45:20 associated with that, that's correct?
01:45:22 >>> Yes, sir, that's correct.
01:45:23 >> And I understand you are happy about that.
01:45:24 >>> Absolutely.
01:45:25 That's correct.

01:45:26 But with regard to the list, if it were simply a list,
01:45:29 I think that is something the paper could do, and as
01:45:32 you say supplement within 30 days or what have you.
01:45:34 But the site plan definition that's incorporated --
01:45:37 and again this was just added last week -- would
01:45:40 require the location of each news rack, sidewalk,
01:45:44 curbs, driveways, fire hydrants --
01:45:47 >> I would agree with you.
01:45:48 I think that's overkill.
01:45:50 For a little box.
01:45:51 I think if you say generally what the address is, now,
01:45:53 this is in front of this address or this intersection
01:45:56 or something like that, I would think that's good
01:45:58 enough for our staff to deal with.
01:46:00 You know, we want to be reasonable.
01:46:03 The first amendment is one of our most precious and
01:46:06 important freedoms.
01:46:08 And when we want to cooperate with you all on that.
01:46:13 But at the same time we need control of our aesthetics
01:46:16 in our community.
01:46:17 So Rebecca, any comments on that?
01:46:19 >>REBECCA KERT: Legal department.

01:46:25 The 30 days, and the master permit with the amendment,
01:46:29 I don't believe the administration has any objections
01:46:31 to that.
01:46:32 The only thing I would say about the site plan is not
01:46:36 the site plans you get when you are doing a rezoning,
01:46:39 it doesn't have to be to scale, it's just saying five
01:46:42 feet away, and it's what is requested by my staff to
01:46:46 my understanding so that the city is sure that it's
01:46:49 meeting the ADA requirement.
01:46:50 >> Well, maybe could you just include, if it's not
01:46:53 there already, include in the regulations say this is
01:46:56 the parameters where they must be, and if they submit
01:46:58 a list, and maybe they need to swear to it and affirm
01:47:03 that all these boxes are at the location and meet
01:47:05 these criteria. So something along those lines.
01:47:08 We don't have to wrestle out those details right this
01:47:11 second.
01:47:11 But I think some compromise along those lines might be
01:47:14 in order.
01:47:19 You.
01:47:20 >> Unless you want toe postpone this --
01:47:22 >> I think you are going to need to postpone it a

01:47:24 little bit if you are going to tweak that up.
01:47:26 >>GWEN MILLER: Next speaker?
01:47:29 >>> Spencer Kass representing Virginia park
01:47:31 neighborhood association.
01:47:32 Actually, it was what councilman Dingfelder referred
01:47:35 to that was my concern.
01:47:37 They don't have to pay any fees.
01:47:39 I appeared before had council.
01:47:41 I said, how about we lower the fees for construction
01:47:43 in the city, or businesses?
01:47:48 Everybody pays their fair share.
01:47:50 We pay the total cost of what it costs for staff time.
01:47:53 Fine.
01:47:55 Now hear from the "The Tampa Tribune."
01:47:58 Oh, not you.
01:47:58 You don't have to pay your fees.
01:48:00 You're a special case.
01:48:01 We are going to do something and the rest of us can
01:48:03 keep paying.
01:48:04 So you want me now to subsidize the "The Tampa
01:48:07 Tribune."
01:48:07 You want all the small businesses to subsidize the

01:48:10 "The Tampa Tribune."
01:48:11 You want all the residents to subsidize the "The Tampa
01:48:13 Tribune."
01:48:14 Nobody else gets a subsidy but they get a subsidy.
01:48:17 Under the ordinance they pay their fair share.
01:48:21 $85 an hour is what they charge.
01:48:23 Let them figure out how to use different site plans
01:48:26 and how much it's going to cost and let them pay.
01:48:29 I want to make it clear it's not a Constitutional
01:48:31 issue.
01:48:32 When the city is entitled to recoup their money to
01:48:35 review their site plans F.I was to do something in the
01:48:37 city, I have to pull permits, I have to pay the bid.
01:48:40 They should be under the exact same regulations that
01:48:43 every one of the rest of us without a subsidy.
01:48:45 Thank you.
01:48:46 >>GWEN MILLER: Next speaker.
01:48:47 >>> Good afternoon.
01:48:51 An CHIVLICK, 3109 west Martin Luther king.
01:48:57 I work for the alliance.
01:48:58 You received a letter from us probably a couple of
01:49:00 days ago.

01:49:01 Even with the Constitutionality provision, we do have
01:49:03 concerns about there's not even a courtesy
01:49:08 notification or any kind of notification with adjacent
01:49:11 property owners, that these are going in front of
01:49:14 their businesses.
01:49:15 We have lots of locations in Westshore today where
01:49:17 these boxes are not located because the property
01:49:21 previously -- and the Tribune and Times have been
01:49:23 great saying, you know, if you spend 100 million on
01:49:26 your property and put in landscaping and sidewalking
01:49:28 and control signage and everything else, they don't
01:49:31 want a rainbow of ten colored boxes sitting in front
01:49:34 of their property.
01:49:35 Because even though it's technically public
01:49:39 right-of-way, for most of us in the public, if you
01:49:41 don't work on this every day you think as a business
01:49:43 owner, why are they doing that?
01:49:44 So when at least would like to see some kind of
01:49:47 notification, courtesy notification of the owner,
01:49:50 something, because to me to put these in the
01:49:52 right-of-way, it's probably the last resort.
01:49:54 We do have some property owners in Westshore and

01:49:56 throughout the city that have worked with the
01:49:58 newspaper companies, and they will provide access,
01:50:01 even on their site, next to their front door, where
01:50:04 you can distribute newspapers.
01:50:05 A lot of the smaller restaurants do that.
01:50:07 So to us, that's a preference, because it's not right
01:50:13 up on the road.
01:50:14 I have plenty of pictures to share with you the
01:50:16 rainbow of boxes on Westshore.
01:50:19 The second thing is the permit situation.
01:50:20 We really think because in order for the city to
01:50:22 really inspect and look at these, there ought to be
01:50:26 some permit fees provided.
01:50:27 It's done in other cases for other uses in the
01:50:30 right-of-way.
01:50:30 The bus benches.
01:50:31 The advertising bus benches on right-of-way have an
01:50:34 annual fee -- I mean initial fee and an annual renewal
01:50:38 fee for that permit.
01:50:39 And that can be used for inspection, removal,
01:50:41 whatever.
01:50:44 You know, we love the idea of the modular racks.

01:50:47 We love the idea of the modular racks.
01:50:49 I have talked to a representative of the "The Tampa
01:50:51 Tribune" before and I think they are great.
01:50:53 But there are concerns about lots and lots of other
01:50:56 publications out there that aren't so great to work
01:50:58 with.
01:50:58 >>MARY MULHERN: I have a question for, I think, Ms.
01:51:03 Kert, whoever, whatever lawyer is in line for this.
01:51:12 You may have explained this.
01:51:13 You probably did and I didn't catch it.
01:51:14 But because of freedom of speech, they can put the
01:51:18 boxes out wherever they want?
01:51:22 Is that the point you are making?
01:51:24 >>> No, absolutely, they cannot put it wherever they
01:51:26 want.
01:51:26 But because the media communication, the news racks,
01:51:32 has been declared by the United States Supreme Court
01:51:33 as protected by the first amendment, there are
01:51:35 restrictions on what we can do.
01:51:37 And one of the things we can't do is delegate to even
01:51:43 an adjoining land owner the ability to say no, because
01:51:46 it could be based upon the content of the speech,

01:51:48 could be based upon anything.
01:51:50 And I would just like to remind City Council, because
01:51:53 it's been a long time, how you actually got here, and
01:51:57 that was you were considering adopting some more
01:52:00 stringent regulations.
01:52:02 And the Tampa Bay publishing group came forward and
01:52:04 said, before you do that, please allow us an
01:52:06 opportunity to work cooperatively with you, and where
01:52:11 we can we would like the ability to put some of these
01:52:15 modulars and where you have a problem with some of our
01:52:18 boxes we would like to work with you to have those
01:52:20 relocated.
01:52:20 And I think it's councilman Dingfelder who at the time
01:52:23 said this voluntary situation sounds good but please
01:52:26 be aware if it doesn't work we will have the
01:52:28 opportunity to come back and put more stringent
01:52:30 regulations.
01:52:31 How we got here was the publishing group came forward
01:52:33 and said, please give us the opportunity to be a good
01:52:37 part of the community and work with you.
01:52:38 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay, I'm not suggesting that they
01:52:40 are not.

01:52:41 I just think it seems unusual, and what we hear all
01:52:47 the time with entire neighborhoods and people coming
01:52:49 in and questioning development or building or
01:52:54 something, and a even the fact that we sometimes have
01:53:02 free speech zones for anyone who wants to talk about
01:53:05 something.
01:53:05 Has it been -- it's been interpreted that newspaper
01:53:10 boxes can be placed in rights-of-way and you can't,
01:53:17 without the consent of the adjoining property owner, I
01:53:23 mean, exactly the situation --
01:53:27 >>> Not exactly on news racks, although there have
01:53:30 been some lower federal courts that have talked about
01:53:32 that.
01:53:33 However, if the -- the United States Supreme Court has
01:53:35 been perfectly clear that you cannot have first
01:53:38 amendment protected activity be decided by a vote, be
01:53:45 decided without standard.
01:53:46 If people don't like where the news racks are and you
01:53:48 are not getting the compliance you like, what the
01:53:50 Supreme Court says you can do is you can decide ahead
01:53:53 of time, not just anyone, City Council can enact
01:53:57 legislation that applies uniformly to everyone, and

01:54:01 says where they can go and what they can look like.
01:54:03 We still -- it's not easy.
01:54:05 You still have to demonstrate you have ample other
01:54:09 opportunities for communication.
01:54:10 >> You say they can go on the right-of-way?
01:54:18 I don't know, it seems --
01:54:20 >>> You have to have regulation that is apply
01:54:22 uniformly.
01:54:22 >> All right.
01:54:23 So what about what she suggested about at leave least
01:54:27 giving notice?
01:54:28 >>> Well, any regulation that you have that's going to
01:54:30 have to be dealing with the first amendment, you are
01:54:35 going to have to have more than a rational basis for
01:54:38 it.
01:54:39 And if there's nothing that people can do, I'm not
01:54:45 sure what it provides, but -- I'm not saying that you
01:54:47 couldn't do it.
01:54:48 But that would be something additional that everyone
01:54:53 would have to do for every individual news rack.
01:54:55 >>MARY MULHERN: Well, I guess the Supreme Court
01:54:58 thinks giving people money is speech to news racks.

01:55:08 It seems curious that we can't write more protection
01:55:11 for adjacent land owners.
01:55:13 >>> You can.
01:55:13 You just have to do it in advance.
01:55:16 And uniformly.
01:55:17 >> So you can do that in this ordinance?
01:55:22 >>> We can do it in an ordinance between first and a
01:55:25 second reading.
01:55:26 If you want to change the criteria for uniformly for
01:55:31 everyone the Supreme Court says you can do that but
01:55:33 it's not easy.
01:55:34 They require you have a very detailed predicate
01:55:36 meaning you have to do a very detailed analysis.
01:55:39 In the particular situation for your town, where other
01:55:43 avenues of speech are available.
01:55:44 Some places have news stands, and that adds into the
01:55:48 alternative Avenue that people have to deliver their
01:55:51 newspapers.
01:55:52 I mean, they require very detailed study.
01:55:55 County be done but I believe that's why City Council
01:55:57 decided to take this approach and try to get some
01:56:00 voluntary compliance.

01:56:02 >> And then my next question is just again about the
01:56:05 fees.
01:56:07 And that's probably not a question for you, or is it?
01:56:10 >>> No, that's not a question --
01:56:13 >> Land development?
01:56:14 >>GWEN MILLER: Ms. Saul-Sena.
01:56:16 >> Let's see if we can get that question answered.
01:56:18 >>> I don't see the administration right now.
01:56:21 They may have stepped out to work on something else.
01:56:23 >>GWEN MILLER: Ms. Saul-Sena?
01:56:26 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you.
01:56:28 This is an issue I tried to address years and years
01:56:31 ago, and frankly because of the first amendment
01:56:36 issues, the voluntary creation of the racks with the
01:56:40 money underwritten by the Tribune, the City of Tampa,
01:56:43 was pretty amazing that this came up, and I think that
01:56:47 it's been a much more satisfactory, visually
01:56:52 satisfactory situation when everything is completely
01:56:55 unregulated.
01:56:56 And I think that while this isn't perfect, it's better
01:56:59 than it was.
01:57:00 But I think the issue is a valid one, how much staff

01:57:07 time is spent reviewing this.
01:57:14 Is that something that we could -- do we have to put
01:57:19 that number in this ordinance?
01:57:21 Or can we just say that the administration will figure
01:57:23 out how much it cost to administer this and charge a
01:57:27 fee accordingly?
01:57:28 >>> Typically City Council adopts these by resolution,
01:57:30 and in this particular ordinance it has again, well
01:57:35 before I was here, stated expressly that there will be
01:57:38 no fees.
01:57:39 So that would be a change.
01:57:41 And to Mr. Dingfelder's point about the permit and a
01:57:45 modification at this point, is that something that
01:57:48 City Council would like to us look into it, we would
01:57:50 request some additional time to talk to staff to see
01:57:52 what practically we could implement as far as making
01:57:55 the permit more flexible.
01:57:57 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'll move to continue this item
01:58:03 and direct staff to consider some greater flexibility
01:58:09 in the permitting process sort of as a group permit
01:58:13 for your generic metal boxes.
01:58:16 Still requiring, as more specific permits for the

01:58:20 bigger, multi-attached boxes.
01:58:23 I think you get the point.
01:58:25 That's the motion.
01:58:25 >> Second.
01:58:29 >>GWEN MILLER: Question on the motion, Mrs.
01:58:31 Saul-Sena?
01:58:31 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I believe the ordinance currently
01:58:33 says no fees will be charged.
01:58:34 How do you feel about that?
01:58:36 Do you want them to fill that out?
01:58:38 >>MARY MULHERN: I second your motion if you strike
01:58:40 the fee.
01:58:41 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Why don't we do that?
01:58:45 How about since Steve Daignault stepped out, why don't
01:58:49 we add to the motion and the exploration of the
01:58:51 possibility of fees?
01:58:51 And then we'll see how the administration feels, what
01:58:54 their recommendation is, and come back with this along
01:58:57 those lines.
01:58:57 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion and second.
01:58:59 All in favor of the motion say Aye.
01:59:01 Opposed, Nay.

01:59:02 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Nay.
01:59:04 Because of the fees.
01:59:05 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Miranda voting no
01:59:08 and Scott being absent.
01:59:10 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Chip Fletcher, number 83.
01:59:15 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: Chip Fletcher, city attorney.
01:59:35 Some time ago the council requested that a procurement
01:59:40 protest procedure be prepared that provided for an
01:59:43 independent hearing officer.
01:59:46 I spent some time working on this.
01:59:49 We transmitted yesterday, I believe, a draft procedure
01:59:54 that is much more involved than what the city has used
01:59:59 in the past.
02:00:00 In the past we have used a fairly general process that
02:00:02 allowed for review of these decisions through our
02:00:07 general administrative review procedures.
02:00:11 This procedure would provide for more formal protest
02:00:14 process, included both the internal administrative
02:00:19 review and then provided for a hearing officer that
02:00:26 would be someone identified within the city attorney's
02:00:28 office.
02:00:28 We selected that option to reduce the cost.

02:00:32 Some of the other options that were considered, which
02:00:35 are used by some other state agencies and localities,
02:00:39 is a fee or a bond to cover the cost of that hearing
02:00:43 officer process.
02:00:44 We decided not to go that route because of the
02:00:46 potential deterrent of seeking a review.
02:00:49 So the compromise was to identify someone in our
02:00:55 office, allow the city attorney to designate someone.
02:00:58 And in discussion was the chairman, that seems to be
02:01:01 an approach that allowed for an independent review,
02:01:05 without significant additional cost.
02:01:09 And our recommendation would to be set it for first
02:01:11 reading at some point in the future.
02:01:13 >>MARY MULHERN: Did you say designate someone in the
02:01:16 legal department?
02:01:18 The city's legal department?
02:01:21 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: Right.
02:01:21 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay.
02:01:23 >>GWEN MILLER: Ms. Saul-Sena?
02:01:27 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: The usual you was really clear
02:01:29 when it was brought up that the whole point is not
02:01:32 having a review by someone who is less than objective.

02:01:35 And the fact that the legal department is still under
02:01:38 the city's umbrella, might there be some sort of
02:01:43 review by someone who is not part of the city
02:01:45 administration?
02:01:48 >>> Under our charter city attorney's office is not
02:01:51 part of the administration and the mayor's office.
02:01:54 We are independent and report both to the mayor and
02:01:56 the council.
02:01:56 That's why this -- this was not my idea, trust me.
02:02:00 But it was seen as an independent, more independent
02:02:05 approach than what was previous.
02:02:06 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Could we send it back to you to
02:02:10 look at a more independent review?
02:02:13 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: It's up to you all, and you all
02:02:17 would enact this going forward.
02:02:19 But the other approaches that we came up with included
02:02:22 a cost that we were trying to figure out how to cover.
02:02:25 And many localities have had hearing officers do that
02:02:30 through either a fee or a bond, and the view was that
02:02:33 while in other situations that's probably appropriate,
02:02:36 where you are looking at someone, especially in
02:02:40 current economic conditions, are seeking an impartial

02:02:42 review, a procurement decision, that that was a
02:02:47 financial barrier that we didn't really think was
02:02:51 prudent.
02:02:51 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Dingfelder?
02:02:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I think there's two goals here.
02:02:58 One is to have as impartial a hearing officer as
02:03:01 possible.
02:03:02 And while I don't doubt that you guys and women in the
02:03:06 legal department can could do that, I think the whole
02:03:09 idea is perception.
02:03:10 And when this issue arose in an actual circumstance, I
02:03:15 think the folks who brought to the our attention, you
02:03:17 know, said, well, the perception is that your city
02:03:21 staff, no matter who they are, you still get a city
02:03:24 paycheck, and you are appointed by the mayor, and
02:03:28 confirmed by us, that you couldn't be impartial.
02:03:32 So I think we have to get over that hurdle which would
02:03:34 point to having an outside person.
02:03:36 The second part is how do you pay for it?
02:03:39 Perhaps, okay -- and I know we have to work with Greg
02:03:43 Spearman on this -- perhaps anybody who wants bid
02:03:46 specifications maybe pays a dollar for those -- a

02:03:50 dollar more.
02:03:51 I don't know if they are paying anything right now but
02:03:54 maybe pay a dollar more as a surcharge for a bid
02:03:56 specifics, you accumulate that over the thousands of
02:03:59 bid specks that we do each year, and you accumulate a
02:04:02 little bit of money for a hearing officer.
02:04:04 Just an idea.
02:04:07 I don't know.
02:04:08 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: Just to be clear, ethically if
02:04:10 someone in our office were to handle these, it would
02:04:13 have to be someone who is not involved -- this is not
02:04:16 spilled out in this procedure but ethically would have
02:04:18 to be someone that is not involved in the prior
02:04:20 decision, who is separated from that decision-making
02:04:21 process, and could sit as an independent impartial
02:04:26 decision maker.
02:04:27 >> At the end of the day that citizen doesn't know or
02:04:30 doesn't care.
02:04:31 They still see a city employee sitting there on the
02:04:34 bench in front of them, and they might not feel as
02:04:38 comfortable as compared to a hearing officer that's
02:04:40 from the outside.

02:04:41 >>MARY MULHERN: That doesn't answer my question,
02:04:45 because that's the whole points.
02:04:48 If we had the city legal department acting as the
02:04:51 hearing officer, and then the petitioner, the
02:04:56 complainant or whatever you call them, isn't
02:04:58 satisfied, then you have to go to the city and they go
02:05:04 to court.
02:05:05 I mean, that does not make sense to me as a solution.
02:05:09 But I also don't understand -- like are there
02:05:13 actual -- I mean, we are not going to have that many
02:05:16 complaints, that many requests for reconsideration.
02:05:21 Maybe David can tell us how many he does now.
02:05:23 But if this is going to be at expense and it might be
02:05:31 in our interest to avoid litigation, which I hear that
02:05:34 all the time, to find some money in the budget to pay
02:05:37 for a hearing officer.
02:05:38 So my question is, are there hearing officers out
02:05:40 there that you hire?
02:05:42 It's not like -- we don't need a full time hearing
02:05:45 officer for this particular thing.
02:05:47 So --
02:05:49 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Piecework.

02:05:51 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: Would you hire someone on an
02:05:53 hourly basis who would be a lawyer.
02:05:55 And we have looked into rates.
02:05:56 And they run from $100 up to get competent folks.
02:06:02 Probably closer to --
02:06:04 >>MARY MULHERN: Right, but my point is it's not
02:06:06 just -- it's in the city's interest to resolve this.
02:06:12 So the city might have some money in the budget that
02:06:15 they could put into it.
02:06:16 So the burden wouldn't all fall on the petitioner, I
02:06:20 guess.
02:06:21 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you, Madam Chair.
02:06:28 I equate this as an appeal.
02:06:30 All appeals cost money.
02:06:32 So are we saying if I appear before aboard and I get
02:06:39 turned down and I appeal, are there any costs to me
02:06:42 for that appeal to be heard?
02:06:44 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: Presently if it's for instance, a
02:06:47 VRB appeal or ARC appeal, there is a cost to appeal
02:06:51 that to City Council.
02:06:53 >> What does it cost?
02:06:54 In other words, years ago when I was working in Ohio,

02:06:57 we used to have all kinds of appeals to the racing
02:07:01 commission from the three stewards.
02:07:03 Two worked for the association.
02:07:04 I worked for the state.
02:07:05 So I told the state, why don't you charge $500 on
02:07:09 appeals, and if they win the appeal, you give them
02:07:13 back their $500.
02:07:15 And now what?
02:07:16 That ended the appeals.
02:07:18 And some won.
02:07:21 But it narrowed it from 100 to 5.
02:07:24 So I'm thinking, if they are so sure that they were
02:07:29 somehow not done right by the board, then they
02:07:35 certainly have the right to appeal.
02:07:37 But in doing that, if we are going to change the
02:07:41 system, I think they ought to pony up with something
02:07:44 to pay for that individual, wherever he or she is, so
02:07:47 that the city is not burdened with the cost.
02:07:49 The general taxpayers are not appealing.
02:07:50 Only those individuals are appealing.
02:07:53 Let them burden the cost.
02:07:54 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: And if I may, way just described

02:07:59 is what in other jurisdictions at the state level is a
02:08:02 bond that functions exactly the way you just
02:08:04 described.
02:08:05 And we did look at that, and that's an option we could
02:08:08 go back to, I suppose, if that was council's
02:08:10 direction.
02:08:10 >>MARY MULHERN: I think that's a great idea.
02:08:15 >> You win, you get back your money.
02:08:17 >>GWEN MILLER: What is the motion?
02:08:19 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: My motion, Madam Chair, if I see
02:08:22 the consensus what I heard from different council
02:08:24 members, is they would rather have an outside
02:08:27 individual not associated with a perception on the
02:08:30 city payroll.
02:08:31 Am I correct so far?
02:08:32 And in order to facilitate that, the general public
02:08:36 should not be held accountable for the payments to
02:08:39 that individual.
02:08:40 And in essence that's what we are doing.
02:08:41 So I suggest that we figure out somehow, legal
02:08:46 department can come back and address this at a later
02:08:48 date, what the cost is, an hour, two-hour time,

02:08:51 whatever they are going to choose, how they are they
02:08:54 are going to choose, that's your prerogative, and at
02:08:56 that time say, okay, from now on these additional
02:08:58 costs plus the cost of the hearing officer, which may
02:09:01 be 200 or 300 or whatever, then you will receive this
02:09:06 and you pay for that hearing officer.
02:09:08 If that hearing officer rules against the government,
02:09:12 which is the City of Tampa, you will get back your
02:09:14 money.
02:09:15 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: We can put that together.
02:09:19 Just for information the way these are typically done
02:09:21 it's a percentage of the contract, and then it's a
02:09:24 bond, and then the cost of the hearing comes out of
02:09:26 that.
02:09:27 If they don't win, and then the whole bond is returned
02:09:29 if they do prevail.
02:09:31 >>GWEN MILLER: How many days?
02:09:34 How long?
02:09:35 >>CHARLES FLETCHER: If you can give us till, I guess,
02:09:37 the beginning of December.
02:09:38 >>GWEN MILLER: We have a motion and second to
02:09:40 continue this item to December.

02:09:41 All in favor of the motion say Aye.
02:09:43 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: With the direction.
02:09:49 >>> Thank you.
02:09:51 >>GWEN MILLER: We go to item 83 through 86.
02:09:54 Anybody in the public that's going to be speaking on
02:09:55 those items, would you please stand and raise your
02:09:57 right hand?
02:10:01 93 to 96.
02:10:03 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: 93 or 83?
02:10:06 (Oath administered by Clerk).
02:10:07 >>GWEN MILLER: We need to open the items.
02:10:11 >> So moved.
02:10:13 >> Second.
02:10:13 >>GWEN MILLER: Open 93.
02:10:21 All in favor of the motion.
02:10:22 (Motion carried)
02:10:23 >>BARBARA LYNCH: Land Development Coordination.
02:10:25 This petition is C 09-07 for an alley that's generally
02:10:30 located in Seminole Heights.
02:10:32 And I have a map to put on the overhead.
02:10:42 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Madam Chair, what time was Mr.
02:10:46 Chiaramonte and his crew scheduled for?

02:10:49 They were scheduled for a time certain at two?
02:10:55 I think it's like Mr. Chairman says, when we bring
02:10:58 people in and tell them a time certain, we should
02:11:02 perhaps respect that.
02:11:03 >>GWEN MILLER: It wasn't a time certain.
02:11:06 Mr. Shelby says it wasn't a time certain.
02:11:08 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Council, there was a discussion to
02:11:14 set this as a special discussion meeting, and the
02:11:16 issue was the fact that there were appeals coming
02:11:18 forth, and that it may not start exactly at 2:00.
02:11:21 And if council wishes to, they could adjourn this
02:11:25 meeting, go to the special discussion meeting, and
02:11:28 then reopen council.
02:11:30 >>GWEN MILLER: I think we should keep going.
02:11:34 Some of these have been here all morning and they have
02:11:36 been sitting here.
02:11:37 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Madam Chair, there's also I believe
02:11:42 item 90.
02:11:43 I'm sorry to interrupt this but Mr. Vaughan is here on
02:11:45 an issue.
02:11:46 And I believe that was one that council member
02:11:50 Dingfelder, you accepted the report?

02:11:59 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Mr. Vaughan is on the first part
02:12:01 of the issue.
02:12:02 I addressed the second part of the issue which is the
02:12:04 Brad Baird dam issue.
02:12:06 So it's a two-part motion that apparently other
02:12:10 council members had questions about green issues.
02:12:13 That's why Mr. Vaughan is here.
02:12:15 My issue is about the water over the dam has already
02:12:18 been water over the dam.
02:12:19 >>GWEN MILLER: Anyone here on part 2?
02:12:25 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Part 2 I'm done with.
02:12:26 It was part 1.
02:12:27 >>GWEN MILLER: Who wanted to hear part 1?
02:12:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I think Mary and Linda did.
02:12:32 We can do it another time.
02:12:33 >>> DAVID VAUGHAN: This is very brief.
02:12:38 David Vaughan, director of contract administration.
02:12:39 In fact, I'm back from my previous report where we
02:12:43 talked about three or four initiatives that were
02:12:45 underway that were related to sustainability and
02:12:47 alternative energy items.
02:12:49 And just to put this in context, you are about a month

02:12:52 away from Thom Snelling, the green officer, coming in
02:12:56 and giving you his annual report as a part of the
02:13:00 green ordinance.
02:13:01 So these things relate to have that.
02:13:02 But it's very focused on some specific topics that we
02:13:06 talked about.
02:13:07 The first one of those was the fact that we were
02:13:10 pursuing an ESCO, an energy service contractor, and to
02:13:15 give you an update on that process, we are closing in
02:13:18 on the selection of the ESCO, we are on contract with
02:13:22 what I told you before that will have the ESCO
02:13:25 selected by the end of the year and expect to come to
02:13:27 you early in 2010 with their initial contract.
02:13:30 And again this is a contractor who will come in,
02:13:32 evaluate our facilities, and propose measures that the
02:13:36 savings would fund.
02:13:37 The second item was we had put ow out an RFI seeking
02:13:43 information on vendors and products and services and
02:13:47 those kinds of things that we might incorporate into
02:13:51 our facilities and into our programs, and particularly
02:13:54 those that potentially bring grants or funding with
02:13:57 them.

02:13:58 That RFI closed about ten days ago.
02:14:02 It was advertised nationally.
02:14:04 We only had 16 responses.
02:14:09 I had looked at -- we are just now getting into
02:14:12 reviewing them.
02:14:12 I looked at all of them, at least cursorily, and they
02:14:16 are sort of a mix of what you might expect.
02:14:19 There are a few very good submittals that really
02:14:22 warrant some further examination.
02:14:26 There are other folks who didn't follow direction and
02:14:28 just submitted to submit stuff.
02:14:30 So we will be reviewing those.
02:14:31 We have the ability in this RFI to go back to them and
02:14:35 get more information.
02:14:37 And it looks like we may have one or two of those that
02:14:40 have some things of interest to us.
02:14:42 Significantly, there was very little solar response to
02:14:48 that.
02:14:48 The third thing that was going was, we have entered
02:14:53 into discussion was the University of South Florida
02:14:54 power center for utility explorations.
02:14:56 They are the folks that are dealing with TECO and the

02:15:02 pilot project up at the zoo.
02:15:03 We are looking at some things that are a little more
02:15:05 ambitious even than that project, and as I reported to
02:15:09 you last time, we don't want to talk too specifically
02:15:12 about what we are looking at because we are going for
02:15:14 competitive grants on those.
02:15:16 I will tell you that those discussions have continued,
02:15:20 and we first started looking primarily in the public
02:15:23 works arena.
02:15:24 We are now looking at some opportunities in some of
02:15:27 our parks to do some things we are not doing now.
02:15:30 And we look forward to coming back to you again, we
02:15:32 think around the first of the year to share with you
02:15:34 some potential projects there that could also bring
02:15:37 funding in order to accomplish them.
02:15:42 The last thing that I spoke to you about previously is
02:15:44 there's an opportunity at the Howard Curren plant for
02:15:48 what's called a gasification project.
02:15:52 Currently, the way that we dispose of sludge is
02:15:55 20-year-old technology that's on its last legs.
02:15:59 There are some folks out there who will come in and
02:16:01 turnkey, put us with some systems that dispose of that

02:16:06 sludge by converting it to heat and electric energy.
02:16:09 And this is a big project.
02:16:12 This is tens of millions of dollars.
02:16:15 The interesting and sort of exciting thing about this
02:16:20 is the opportunity that's therein as one that would
02:16:23 not require capital outlay by the city.
02:16:27 We have identified at least a couple of folks
02:16:30 nationally that do this.
02:16:32 We are on the verge, hope to have that before
02:16:35 Thanksgiving, an RFQ, in order to get those proposals
02:16:38 and get that process underway.
02:16:42 And the that sort of updates you on the things we
02:16:46 talked about before.
02:16:46 Be happy to answer any questions.
02:16:47 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: This is very exciting.
02:16:51 I recently sat through a variety of presentations by
02:16:54 Florida solar, by -- there are a lot of initiatives
02:16:58 out there, other municipalities are doing it.
02:17:02 Tampa General Hospital has just saved a ton of money
02:17:06 with their conservation initiative.
02:17:08 And I'm confident that we can also.
02:17:10 And I will give you a card.

02:17:12 I want you to talk to the person at TGH because they
02:17:16 are just saving all kinds of money.
02:17:18 But last week Thom Snelling attended a meeting about a
02:17:22 Tampa, St. Petersburg, Pinellas County, Pinellas
02:17:26 County, request from the feds for a very large amount
02:17:28 of money to do conservation both with the city and our
02:17:33 citizens.
02:17:33 It's a very tight deadline.
02:17:36 We have to agree to cooperate.
02:17:37 They are going to write the application.
02:17:38 We have to get in the by mid December.
02:17:41 I'm hearing your date and thinking you are thinking
02:17:43 more outward.
02:17:44 I really want you to talk to Thom in the next week
02:17:48 about this and getting on board because county be
02:17:50 federal money to enable to us realize these things.
02:17:52 >>> Actually most of those things are appropriately
02:17:55 spearheaded through Thom with us providing support.
02:17:58 These are sort of anomalies that popped up,
02:18:02 opportunities that popped up.
02:18:03 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: My concern is that other
02:18:05 communities have a full time person working on it and

02:18:09 we have part of Thom, we have part of Lauralee, but I
02:18:12 mean this is the time, we have the federal money out
02:18:14 there for the asking, and I just am concerned that we
02:18:19 absolutely put all of our best professional efforts
02:18:21 into securing the money so that we are able to realize
02:18:24 these projects.
02:18:25 It sounds like you have lots of good initiatives.
02:18:27 >> Thanks.
02:18:29 I look forward to your information as well.
02:18:32 >>MARY MULHERN: I just wanted to second that and say,
02:18:35 please, this is some big money we can get, and we have
02:18:38 to turn it around fast.
02:18:40 And anything you can do to help that happen.
02:18:42 >>> Thank you.
02:18:44 >>GWEN MILLER: Now go back to number 93.
02:18:46 >>BARBARA LYNCH: Land Development Coordination.
02:18:51 C 09-07 is a request to vacate an alley in the
02:18:55 Seminole Heights area of town.
02:18:57 I have a map for the overhead.
02:19:08 It's in the report.
02:19:40 This is in Seminole Heights.
02:19:43 And it is in the local and national historic district.

02:19:45 And on the map, the petitioner's property is outlined
02:19:49 in red and the alley is outlined in yellow, and it
02:19:52 lies between branch and central, and Idlewild and
02:19:57 Clifton avenues.
02:19:58 And I also brought in another map that shows how this
02:20:01 is actually platted.
02:20:04 The plats that made up this block, this was platted as
02:20:11 an alleyway, and other portions, another alleyway was
02:20:17 platted.
02:20:20 This is a dead-end alleyway.
02:20:23 And it went to the ARC.
02:20:25 I only got comments from ARC the other day so I wanted
02:20:28 you to have a copy.
02:20:39 I have some pictures of the alley.
02:20:44 The first shot is a picture of an alley from branch.
02:20:48 And you can see it's overgrown.
02:20:51 It's unimproved.
02:20:52 >> That structure is in the alley.
02:20:59 >> I guess it's a bunch.
02:21:00 >> What's out back?
02:21:02 >> Basically nothing.
02:21:03 When you see the petitioner's property, this one here,

02:21:05 this is on the south side of the alley.
02:21:07 And so you can see there's two garages on either side
02:21:10 of it.
02:21:13 But there's nothing in the alley except for that bench
02:21:16 and some trees.
02:21:18 And then there's another shot of petitioner's property
02:21:20 on the south side of the alley.
02:21:24 And this is petitioner's property on the north side of
02:21:27 the alley.
02:21:27 And then I have a couple of shots of the other portion
02:21:29 of the alley that's not being vacated.
02:21:32 And this is the alley -- it's not going to be vacated
02:21:37 and it's the alley for Clifton.
02:21:40 Staff has no objection to the staff and there's no
02:21:42 easements requested and parks did request that they
02:21:44 follow the guidelines of chapter 13 for trees in the
02:21:52 alley to be protected.
02:21:53 >>GWEN MILLER: Petitioner?
02:21:56 >>MARY MULHERN: Could I ask a couple questions?
02:22:05 So the property, the alley is between -- is
02:22:13 perpendicular between branch and Clifton?
02:22:17 >>> Yes.

02:22:17 >> If you are on Clifton and looking toward the alley,
02:22:21 there is no structure there?
02:22:22 It's not two lots?
02:22:24 Is that right?
02:22:25 Or not?
02:22:26 >>> You mean where the alley dead-ends?
02:22:34 >> I'm trying to see the alley looking east from
02:22:37 branch.
02:22:39 I have got to get my directions.
02:22:40 >>> That's the actual alley that's going to be closed.
02:22:47 >> That is the alley, the grass part of the alley.
02:22:50 Don't zoom in, zoom out.
02:22:54 So who is petitioning?
02:23:03 Point to me who the petitioner is.
02:23:04 >>> The gentleman owns the property on both sides.
02:23:08 >> Are they both asking for the vacation?
02:23:10 >>> He owns both.
02:23:12 He owns both the properties.
02:23:16 Just to be clear, he owns this -- the alley is about
02:23:19 200 feet long.
02:23:21 His property borders on the east 150 feet and there's
02:23:23 two other owners that back up on this further in.

02:23:28 >> Okay, thanks.
02:23:31 Thank you for explaining it.
02:23:32 >>GWEN MILLER: Petitioner?
02:23:33 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Anybody in opposition?
02:23:39 >>> My name is Jeff Fernandez.
02:23:41 I'm the owner of the property at 5903 and 5909 North
02:23:45 Branch.
02:23:46 And that tree lined area is overgrown and hasn't been
02:23:50 used since before the 1960s.
02:23:55 And the trees, the size of the trees that are there,
02:23:58 dictate that.
02:23:58 I mean, it's very large trees.
02:24:00 >>GWEN MILLER: Is there anyone in the public that
02:24:02 would like to speak on item 93?
02:24:05 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Move to close.
02:24:06 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Second.
02:24:06 (Motion carried)
02:24:10 >>> Thank you.
02:24:11 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I would like to move an ordinance
02:24:15 vacating closing continuing abandoning certain
02:24:17 right-of-way alley lying south of east Idlewild
02:24:21 Avenue, north of east Clifton street, east of north

02:24:23 branch Avenue, and west of north Central Avenue, on
02:24:26 north Seminole Heights, a subdivision in the city of
02:24:28 Tampa, Florida as more particularly described in
02:24:32 section 2 noting covenants and restrictions more fully
02:24:37 described herein providing an effective date.
02:24:40 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Scott, Caetano and
02:24:44 Miranda being absent at vote.
02:24:45 Second reading of the ordinance will be held November
02:24:49 19th at 9:30 a.m.
02:24:52 >>GWEN MILLER: Mr. Dingfelder?
02:24:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: If Mr. Chiaramonte could give us a
02:25:00 ten minute version.
02:25:01 We have three appeal hearings.
02:25:03 Two appeal hearings.
02:25:04 And traditionally they take an hour each.
02:25:07 I just don't think it's fair to have --
02:25:13 >>GWEN MILLER: Would you rather come back?
02:25:15 Would you get with the clerk's office, and -- Mr.
02:25:21 Chiaramonte, would you get with the clerk's office and
02:25:25 come back?
02:25:27 What item is that?
02:25:28 Oh, special discussion?

02:25:29 I don't even need to make a motion.
02:25:31 Thank you.
02:25:31 >>GWEN MILLER: We go to item 94 which is a continued
02:25:37 public hearing.
02:25:37 >>ERNEST MUELLER: Assistant city attorney.
02:25:56 Today you have before you the appeal of the variance
02:25:59 review board's denial of case number VRB-09-55.
02:26:06 The property in this appeal is located at 2602 east
02:26:10 Hillsborough Avenue, and the petitioner is Fifth Third
02:26:14 Bank.
02:26:15 The variance request was to increase the allowable
02:26:18 wall sign size from zero feet to 61 feet that would
02:26:23 allow for a wall sign not facing the public
02:26:28 right-of-way.
02:26:30 Here is a photograph of the wall sign he wishes to
02:26:37 install.
02:26:38 And here is a diagram that indicates -- let me bring
02:26:45 this in a little bit.
02:26:48 It would be going from here in this area that says
02:26:52 B-2.
02:26:53 That's where they want it to face.
02:26:55 It would be facing this private drive.

02:26:57 That's not a public street.
02:27:02 The applicable code, city code, is section
02:27:05 20.5-13-C-2, which regulates building signs and office
02:27:11 commercial and industrial districts.
02:27:14 And if council would like I can provide a copy of that
02:27:16 section.
02:27:17 Would you like that?
02:27:18 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Yes.
02:27:21 >>> I was going to direct everybody to that
02:27:52 subsection.
02:27:53 And 20.5-13 C-2, there's a subsection A, which is --
02:28:04 that's what limits the number of allowable building
02:28:07 signs.
02:28:08 And limits it to one for single -- double frontage
02:28:17 parcels shall be allowed one sign per street.
02:28:20 Frontage.
02:28:23 As I pointed out earlier, the issue here is that
02:28:26 driveway is not considered street frontage.
02:28:29 The Variance Review Board voted to deny the
02:28:31 application by a vote of 4-3 on the basis that the
02:28:35 petitioner did not show a hardship or practical
02:28:39 difficulty to warrant the second sign facing the

02:28:41 private drive that was not a public street.
02:28:46 At this time, I will turn the podium over to Mr --
02:28:50 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Wait, can I ask a question?
02:28:52 I am looking at this map.
02:28:53 It appears where it says A-1, is that the initial
02:28:56 sign?
02:28:57 >>ERNEST MUELLER: No.
02:28:58 A-1 is a pylon sign.
02:29:04 It's allowable.
02:29:05 >> Is it a pylon sign that identifies the bank?
02:29:08 >>> Yes they will be able to show you a picture of
02:29:16 that sign.
02:29:18 Right here is a building sign that is facing
02:29:21 Hillsborough.
02:29:23 Here --
02:29:24 >> So it's the third sign that's in question?
02:29:27 >>ERNEST MUELLER: Yes.
02:29:28 B-2.
02:29:29 This one here is the one we are looking at.
02:29:32 Is there any other questions us what before I turn the
02:29:35 podium over to the representative?
02:29:37 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Before we continue, council, just to

02:29:38 have remind you, your standard of review under 27-373,
02:29:44 that you should determine whether the board decision
02:29:46 was supported by competent, substantial evidence,
02:29:49 whether due process was accorded, and whether the
02:29:52 essential requirements of law had been observed.
02:29:55 Additionally, council, to refresh your recollection on
02:29:57 this case and the case that follows, I am giving you a
02:30:01 copy of section 17.574, the application of the
02:30:06 variance power with the criteria.
02:30:08 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you.
02:30:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I understand this is our first
02:30:56 meeting back with our closed captioner.
02:30:58 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Yes.
02:30:59 It's much better.
02:30:59 >> So I think we all want to welcome him or her back
02:31:02 and thank them for the good job that they do.
02:31:05 If you want to say anything, you can type it out.
02:31:07 (Laughter)
02:31:07 >> Hello everybody!
02:31:10 It's good to be back.
02:31:11 (smile)
02:31:15 (Applause)

02:31:18 >>> Thank you.
02:31:28 Good afternoon, council members.
02:31:29 I'm Mike Chalk with Sign Star, 7720 U.S. 301 North
02:31:33 here in Tampa representing Fifth Third Bank.
02:31:36 This bank is located on east Hillsborough area in the
02:31:39 east Hillsborough redevelopment area.
02:31:43 Actually, Meridian Points development.
02:31:47 And the bank branch serving all of east Hillsborough
02:31:52 area, and the community bond are served by the common
02:31:58 entryway here.
02:31:59 We asked that a sign be allowed on the west elevation
02:32:03 of this building.
02:32:07 On a feature that would allow the people that are
02:32:10 served by this communities and that this bank in term
02:32:14 serves to access the bank in a safe manner.
02:32:17 As it stands today, there are traffic considerations
02:32:22 on Hillsborough Avenue.
02:32:24 We have an entrance, primary entrance into our bank
02:32:27 that comes off of this developed private road, into
02:32:30 the bank, and is primarily back into Meridian.
02:32:34 There is a secondary entrance, it's located down here,
02:32:39 past the bank.

02:32:43 There is our median before this entrance here.
02:32:45 And this creates a situation -- a situation that makes
02:32:51 it for folks traveling eastbound, coming am out from
02:32:53 I-275.
02:32:55 There's a choice point.
02:32:56 A choice point is where the turn to this bank occurs
02:33:02 well before you see of this pylon sign located after
02:33:04 the bank building, so to speak.
02:33:06 If I may, could I pull a photograph up and show you?
02:33:11 This is more or less a close-up showing the bank in
02:33:17 detail here.
02:33:18 We have an existing letter -- facing Hillsborough
02:33:23 Avenue.
02:33:24 Down here, using the railroad tracks, is a small pylon
02:33:28 sign, 50 square feet, purchase the current sign code
02:33:32 in Tampa.
02:33:33 Our entrance, our shared common entryway is here, and
02:33:38 if you like, go right back in here.
02:33:41 What we are hoping to have do by allowing this sign on
02:33:44 the west side of the building is for public safety
02:33:49 turn people into this bank in a timely fashion,
02:33:52 address them with signage and identification, that

02:33:54 they can see from a reasonable distance.
02:33:58 There is a long left turn lane that runs in front of
02:34:01 the drive-in theater, and allows you to turn into the
02:34:06 developed private road.
02:34:07 It serves both communities and the bank branch and
02:34:10 gets you to their main entrance.
02:34:12 This, you are traveling down Hillsborough Avenue.
02:34:15 If you don't make that turn, you will pass the bank.
02:34:18 You will cross the railroad tracks.
02:34:20 And you will go down by the state trooper's office for
02:34:23 a U-turn in order to come back and grab this.
02:34:26 It's way down here.
02:34:27 We are asking for a sign that will allow to be
02:34:30 identified, the folks coming to turn into this turn
02:34:33 lane in a timely fashion, in a safe fashion as well.
02:34:36 >>MARTIN SHELBY: So the record is clear, the pictures
02:34:38 you are showing City Council was also shown to the
02:34:40 VRB?
02:34:42 >>> Yes, sir.
02:34:42 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Thank you.
02:34:53 >> I stood out on Hillsborough Avenue and took a
02:34:58 couple of pictures to show you what the situation is.

02:35:06 This is the choice point basically.
02:35:08 As we are proceeding eastbound on Hillsborough Avenue
02:35:10 which I think most of the traffic will be doing, turn
02:35:15 in here.
02:35:15 We need to make a choice right here, 450 feet away.
02:35:25 This pie ton feature is an ideal place to put some
02:35:30 identification allowing people to recognize and
02:35:32 understand they should turn into the shared common
02:35:34 entryway, and in fact functions as their street, the
02:35:38 front of their bank faces towards.
02:35:41 Let's look at another one that's a little closer.
02:35:45 This is eastbound traffic from about 100 feet away.
02:35:49 Clearly the feature is there, and it's the place to
02:35:53 puts a sign, allowing people to have see the bank
02:35:55 building, know where they are going, turn in in a
02:35:59 timely and safe manner.
02:36:00 We would ask you to reconsider the Variance Review
02:36:03 Board's decision on this, allow this sign to be placed
02:36:08 in light of this shared common entryway road
02:36:11 functioning as a public street, and allow a sign to be
02:36:15 placed on the west elevation.
02:36:17 Thank you.

02:36:17 >>GWEN MILLER: Questions by council?
02:36:20 >>MARY MULHERN: I just had a question.
02:36:23 The sign, would it be illuminated?
02:36:26 >>> Yes, ma'am.
02:36:27 It's proposed to.
02:36:28 >>MARY MULHERN: So that would be additional to
02:36:30 illumination to what's on the tower now?
02:36:34 >>> Yes, ma'am.
02:36:36 >>MARY MULHERN: And the letters are going to be --
02:36:40 they will be just regular letters?
02:36:41 It's not going to be electronic?
02:36:45 >>> Activated sign?
02:36:48 No, ma'am.
02:36:49 >>MARY MULHERN: I just mean lighting up.
02:36:51 That's exactly the type of lettering you are going to
02:36:53 have?
02:37:00 Are those the same -- is that Photoshopped or is that
02:37:04 another branch?
02:37:06 Oh, that's what's on the other side?
02:37:08 >>> Well, this is the west elevation.
02:37:11 >> Okay, Photoshopped.
02:37:13 >>> I understand the elevation facing Hillsborough

02:37:16 does have a sign exactly the same size.
02:37:18 It's been legally permitted and installed.
02:37:21 If you turn back to the -- these are individual
02:37:26 letters being similar in construction, illuminated
02:37:31 with L.E.D. illumination.
02:37:34 >> And lit up.
02:37:36 And looks like the third one is, too.
02:37:38 >> Yes.
02:37:39 >> Is it real?
02:37:41 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Photoshopped.
02:37:42 >>> I'm sorry.
02:37:47 Yes, that is a photograph there.
02:37:50 The sign does not yet at this date exist.
02:37:55 >>MARY MULHERN: I'm a graphic designer.
02:37:58 So you Photoshopped the image of the -- the logo and
02:38:02 the letters onto the actual building that you are
02:38:05 asking for the variance?
02:38:06 >>> That's correct.
02:38:07 That is my photograph with corral draw imagery imposed
02:38:14 upon it.
02:38:15 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Okay.
02:38:19 Did any of your photographs that you presented to the

02:38:21 VRB -- because we are not supposed to listen to new
02:38:24 evidence -- show the pylon sign any better than the
02:38:28 long distance shots that you had?
02:38:30 >>> No, sir.
02:38:32 These are what I showed the VRB.
02:38:36 Would you like me to set one back up?
02:38:39 >> If could you pass it up here, perhaps the street
02:38:42 scene, because -- I'm not familiar with the pylon
02:38:46 sign.
02:38:47 I think one of the issues that was raised in the
02:38:49 transcript in the VRB is they said that you hadn't met
02:38:51 the hardship to say why you need additional western
02:38:55 exposure.
02:38:56 You are making the argument that the pylon sign
02:39:00 doesn't cut the mustard, so to speak.
02:39:05 Also I would like to see what the pylon sign looks
02:39:07 like.
02:39:14 Point to it.
02:39:20 I guess that makes the point.
02:39:21 All right.
02:39:22 Where is it?
02:39:22 Point to it.

02:39:40 >>> That doesn't light up?
02:39:45 >> Does it light up in the day?
02:39:52 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: So it's 50 square feet.
02:39:54 Five by ten perhaps?
02:39:55 >>> Yes.
02:40:08 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: One other question, Mr. Chairman.
02:40:10 I guess you're back.
02:40:12 Was there any discussion about at the VRB about -- I
02:40:17 mean, you're not a convenience store, somewhere some
02:40:22 stranger driving down the street.
02:40:24 So it's, boy, I need a Slurpee, and whereof is the
02:40:29 next convenience store?
02:40:31 You know what I'm saying?
02:40:32 You're a specific bank with specific customers who
02:40:36 already know where you are.
02:40:39 So I guess did that discussion come up at all with the
02:40:45 VRB?
02:40:46 >>> I don't know that the Variance Review Board
02:40:49 directly addressed that.
02:40:50 I would respond that this bank serve it is East Tampa
02:40:54 community, and that identifying the facility for the
02:40:59 citizenry in that part of town is a valuable thing to

02:41:05 be achieved.
02:41:05 >> So you might be trying to attract new customers or
02:41:10 people who just want to cash a check that might not be
02:41:12 a customer already or something like that?
02:41:14 >>> Yes, sir.
02:41:16 From my experience.
02:41:17 I bank with all the branches at my bank in my travels.
02:41:20 And it's good for me to be able to find them and turn
02:41:24 into them.
02:41:25 I don't know exactly where they all are.
02:41:27 I go by looking for signs.
02:41:28 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Thank you.
02:41:41 >>> Spencer Kass.
02:41:43 I think somehow we got off track from where we are
02:41:46 supposed to be.
02:41:47 This is an appeal of the Variance Review Board.
02:41:50 Their burden is to prove that the Variance Review
02:41:52 Board didn't follow the criteria. The first criteria
02:41:56 under the package is that the alleged hardship or
02:41:59 practical difficulty is unique and singular with
02:42:01 respect to the property.
02:42:04 Unique and singular with respect to the property.

02:42:05 Way testified to at the previous hearing is that those
02:42:10 medians prosecutor put down Hillsborough Avenue.
02:42:12 Every one of us including myself on Hillsborough
02:42:16 Avenue suffers from the exact same problem.
02:42:18 Their problem is they don't have enough signage.
02:42:23 Everyone in the city has that.
02:42:25 When you passed the sign code I had that.
02:42:27 I asked you not to do it.
02:42:28 This comes back to a very simple point.
02:42:30 They want more signage and they feel entitled to it.
02:42:33 So my question to you is, what is the unique and
02:42:35 singular hardship that this appellant suffers from?
02:42:40 The answer is there is none.
02:42:41 You can review this transcript a hundred different
02:42:43 times. We scanned it in and search for it every time
02:42:47 they address that issue.
02:42:48 The VRB said there is nothing.
02:42:52 At one point in the testimony, well, the tree blocks
02:42:55 it.
02:42:56 Is that causing you a problem?
02:42:58 No.
02:42:58 We don't have a problem because of the trees.

02:42:59 The truth is they want more signage because they want
02:43:02 more signage.
02:43:02 At some point you got into this argument that, well,
02:43:05 this is kind of like a road, this drive isle.
02:43:08 How is it a drive isle?
02:43:10 So we are all clear neither the VRB nor the council
02:43:13 has the right to declare a drive isle a road.
02:43:15 The only person who gets to declare a road is the
02:43:18 transportation division through the technical manual.
02:43:21 So I don't even understand the basis for the appeal.
02:43:24 They are basically giving the exact same story for the
02:43:27 VRB.
02:43:28 They are not saying the VRB made a mistake, the VRB
02:43:31 made an error, that the VRB violated due process.
02:43:34 They are just saying we want more signage.
02:43:37 I think it's great that they are out there.
02:43:38 I told them I would stand up here in front of this
02:43:40 council and argue the sign code should be changed.
02:43:42 But this isn't the appropriate time to do it.
02:43:45 If this council resumes they are entitled to more
02:43:47 signage, that you don't have to have a unique and
02:43:49 singular hardship, you can just meet one of the other

02:43:52 criteria, I have no problem with.
02:43:54 That but I want all of us to be treated the same.
02:43:57 If I stand up here, or at later hearings, any of those
02:44:00 applicants stand up and they only prove one of these
02:44:02 conditions for a variance, that we are entitled to our
02:44:05 variance.
02:44:06 It shouldn't be that extensive to stand up and you
02:44:09 have to meet all five, and they don't have to meet any
02:44:12 of them.
02:44:12 So I just respectfully submit that you stick to the
02:44:15 letter of the law, or the surrounding that you don't
02:44:18 have to use all five of the criteria and any one of
02:44:22 the criteria will suffice for a variance.
02:44:24 Thank you.
02:44:27 >> You don't have to meet all five of the criteria.
02:44:41 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Do you want clarification?
02:44:42 >>> I was going to clarify, one of the five criteria,
02:44:47 17.5.
02:44:50 >> You don't even have to meet one of them because we
02:44:52 drafted the language.
02:44:53 >>> Has to be considered.
02:44:56 >> All of them have to be considered but you don't

02:44:58 have to meet any of them.
02:44:59 >>GWEN MILLER: Move to close --
02:45:07 >> Well, rebuttal.
02:45:08 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Sir, you have three minutes to
02:45:10 respond.
02:45:10 >>> Thank you.
02:45:14 We ask council to alter the VRB's decision, change
02:45:29 that VRB decision.
02:45:30 It seems to me that the street, that's a driveway here
02:45:37 but in fact serve that is community and serves this
02:45:39 bank and is a developed private road, offers the
02:45:45 possibility for a sign to be placed on that side, if
02:45:48 it were considered a street.
02:45:49 If in fact there was a street there, municipal street
02:45:55 sign out there, we would not be before you today.
02:45:57 We would permit our sign legally.
02:46:01 It meets all the other criteria of the sign code.
02:46:03 And it would be serving its function which is to
02:46:05 safely direct folks into this bank branch that serve
02:46:08 that is east Hillsborough community.
02:46:10 We would ask for your interpretation of this developed
02:46:16 private road that it would be considered as

02:46:19 functioning as a street, and allow this sign to
02:46:22 correctly identify this bank, allowing safe entry from
02:46:26 the dedicated turn lane from Hillsborough Avenue.
02:46:29 Thank you.
02:46:29 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: Is that a two-sided sign?
02:46:37 >>> The pylon sign down at the extreme east of the
02:46:40 property single-family a double-faced sign, sir.
02:46:42 >>MARY MULHERN: My question -- this is a brand new
02:46:49 building, right?
02:46:50 >>> Yes, it is.
02:46:51 >>MARY MULHERN: And was there an existing sign for a
02:46:55 former business there?
02:46:59 Did you consider putting the sign maybe midway between
02:47:04 the traffic east and a westbound traffic so that it
02:47:06 would be closer?
02:47:10 >>> Well, as a sign contractor, I liked placing it on
02:47:15 the corner there and there was not a place available.
02:47:18 It required driveways, it required plantations.
02:47:21 The space including a visibilities try angle, it
02:47:26 pushed the sign to the full end of the property.
02:47:28 The pole sign serves westbound traffic.
02:47:32 Those coming from eastbound around the railroad track,

02:47:35 no argument with that.
02:47:37 It's working down there.
02:47:38 Just doesn't work for those folks, those many folks
02:47:40 coming from 275.
02:47:42 >>MARY MULHERN: Could you put the picture that you
02:47:45 brought up, put it up there for a minute again?
02:47:47 Because it looked to me like there was a lot of --
02:47:50 oops.
02:48:00 >>GWEN MILLER: Between the bank and the railroad
02:48:02 tracks.
02:48:13 >>MARY MULHERN: The far right as we look at that
02:48:15 picture.
02:48:18 I still don't understand.
02:48:19 There are some trees.
02:48:20 But it also looks like there's some low shrubbery.
02:48:23 Maybe the trees would have been block the -- I'm
02:48:32 asking him a question.
02:48:33 Are you saying that the trees -- that picture, it's
02:48:38 hard to tell from this picture because the dark is so
02:48:40 dark.
02:48:41 Where the sign is.
02:48:43 But you can't really tell where the trees are from

02:48:46 this angle either.
02:48:48 But the problem with putting the sign midway instead
02:48:51 of way to the east or west -- is it west or east?
02:48:57 >> Way off to the east end of the property.
02:48:59 >>MARY MULHERN: I still don't -- it looks like they
02:49:02 are somewhere in there you could have put it.
02:49:13 >>> Again, our visibility, the setbacks, the sign was
02:49:17 in the driveway.
02:49:19 The trees got there before we did on the approved
02:49:22 landscape plan.
02:49:37 >> Move to close.
02:49:38 >> Second.
02:49:38 (Motion carried).
02:49:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Question to legal.
02:49:44 Marty, or you guys.
02:49:47 It's interesting.
02:49:48 But let's clarify the standard.
02:49:49 Okay.
02:49:52 If I disagree with the VRB factually, all right, but I
02:49:57 think they might have made a different decision than I
02:50:00 might have from my judgment perspective or factual
02:50:02 perspective, that's not necessarily enough, is it, to

02:50:06 reverse based upon our currents standards?
02:50:09 Is that correct?
02:50:10 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Certiorari standard, the answer is
02:50:12 no, you are not to reweigh the evidence but in effect
02:50:15 you look at the evidence that they did consider, and
02:50:17 was it competent and was it substantial?
02:50:19 That being the case, then there is a basis to uphold
02:50:22 their decision.
02:50:23 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: That's what I am looking at.
02:50:26 If I am sitting on the VRB, I sort of looked at it
02:50:30 from a practical perspective and said, all right, I
02:50:34 guess I can see what his point is.
02:50:36 But the way our appellant standard is right now, until
02:50:40 we change it, I don't know if it's enough, and Marty
02:50:43 is saying it's not enough to do that because the three
02:50:45 standards that we have to deal with are --
02:50:51 >>> Whether the board decision was supported by
02:50:54 competent evidence, whether due process was accorded
02:50:56 and with the essential requirements of law have been
02:50:58 observed.
02:50:59 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: In light of that I might have a
02:51:02 hard time reversing it.

02:51:05 Just because I think they did their job I would
02:51:07 disagree with their conclusion.
02:51:08 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: I want to the say I echo his
02:51:17 sentiment.
02:51:18 I understand what Mr. Dingfelder is saying.
02:51:19 If there was a way to do this I would change it.
02:51:22 But I don't think under the present condition that we
02:51:24 have, and the way these things are written, there's
02:51:27 very little wiggle room to say that under the criteria
02:51:34 presently available to us to overturn the Variance
02:51:36 Review Board.
02:51:37 >>GWEN MILLER: I don't see why we can't overturn it.
02:51:42 I know it's not a street.
02:51:43 But it's a public use.
02:51:44 And a lot of people in that area use that driveway,
02:51:48 whatever we want to call it.
02:51:49 But as you drive east and west on Hillsborough, if you
02:51:53 don't know that bank is there, you continue to pass it
02:51:56 by.
02:51:57 And I would like --
02:51:59 >>MARTIN SHELBY: If I can then, let me direct your
02:52:01 attention to 17.5-74 sub-1.

02:52:06 If what you are saying is based on your review of the
02:52:09 transcript you see an alleged hardship and it's unique
02:52:11 and singular with respect to this property and can
02:52:14 articulate that, and say that that was not properly
02:52:17 applied to the VRB, then that could be a basis if
02:52:20 there is a factual basis to support that being unique.
02:52:24 Otherwise you run into the same problem that Mr. Kass
02:52:26 raised that if you just say there is no hardship, that
02:52:29 it does open the door in fairness I shall to you every
02:52:32 other property that faces it.
02:52:34 If you based on the record can articulate the basis
02:52:37 for the granting of a variance, then one could make
02:52:43 that argue full-time that's council's pleasure.
02:52:45 >>GWEN MILLER: That is my argument.
02:52:46 And I am going to articulate it.
02:52:49 But that drive -- it is used more for anyone else and
02:53:01 the people going back and forth, I feel like when you
02:53:03 are traveling east and west on Hillsborough and didn't
02:53:06 know that bank was there, they wouldn't have any more
02:53:10 patrons and that's why the bank is to serve East
02:53:12 Tampa, and if it's not known they would not serve East
02:53:15 Tampa, and this is a bank we have been waiting to get

02:53:17 there, and I would like to make a motion that we
02:53:19 overturn the VRB's decision, because I feel like it
02:53:23 would be an asset to that community to know that that
02:53:26 bank is there, and when the people turn, but if
02:53:29 there's not a street but it is a driveway, you will
02:53:31 know that that bank is there and you can turn in and
02:53:34 go into that bank.
02:53:34 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Let me just add to that, the
02:53:39 uniqueness is the railroad track and the pylon making
02:53:43 it hard to turn in so that is the uniqueness and the
02:53:45 hardship, which he didn't really articulate as he
02:53:49 should, but that is very well it.
02:53:51 You have to know that area.
02:53:52 You have to know what's there.
02:53:53 I drive that every -- I came back from there.
02:53:58 You have to know where the railroad tracks are.
02:54:00 You have to know the pylon sign.
02:54:02 If you are not familiar, and you don't see that.
02:54:09 >> Mr. Chairman, I went to the ribbon cutting.
02:54:16 I really didn't know write was going.
02:54:18 I passed the bank.
02:54:22 They need a sign there.

02:54:23 And the people all spoke, all the residents who were
02:54:26 there, and the mayor was there, there were a lot of
02:54:29 people there.
02:54:30 They need recognition.
02:54:32 So it can be recognized.
02:54:34 Some guy is not going to be down saying, well, I am
02:54:38 going to stick my money in there.
02:54:40 He's going to go in there with an intent.
02:54:42 And this will identify, and it will alleviate a lot of
02:54:45 traffic problems.
02:54:46 >>MARY MULHERN: I have a question.
02:54:51 I guess this is for Marty.
02:54:52 But Chairman Scott was mentioning the railroad.
02:54:55 But if that wasn't mentioned in the -- as a hardship,
02:55:00 if that wasn't cited as hardship in the original, you
02:55:04 know, variance review board hearing, can we base the
02:55:09 decision on that?
02:55:12 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: You probably can take judicial
02:55:14 notice of the railroad track.
02:55:15 It's been there for a hundred years or more.
02:55:17 >>MARY MULHERN: But if they are basing their
02:55:21 decision --

02:55:26 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I believe -- I have a vague
02:55:29 recollection.
02:55:30 Mr. Mueller?
02:55:31 >>ERNEST MUELLER: The railroad tracks was certainly
02:55:35 testified to.
02:55:38 >>GWEN MILLER: I call for the question.
02:55:40 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I don't believe there was a motion.
02:55:43 >>GWEN MILLER: I made a motion.
02:55:46 >>MARTIN SHELBY: So the motion so I hear it again is
02:55:48 to overturn the decision of the board and Grand grant
02:55:52 the variance based on the uniqueness and sing later
02:55:58 with respect to that property?
02:56:01 >> Yes.
02:56:01 That's correct.
02:56:02 It's been moved and seconded.
02:56:03 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
02:56:06 Opposes?
02:56:08 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Dingfelder and
02:56:11 Saul-Sena voting no.
02:56:11 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Again just to make the record clear,
02:56:18 the decision is then with regard to your standard of
02:56:22 review whether the essential requirements of law

02:56:24 everybody observed in the application of the hardship
02:56:26 criteria.
02:56:27 >>GWEN MILLER: Yes.
02:56:30 >>> Thank you very much, council members.
02:56:32 I appreciate it.
02:56:32 >>THOMAS SCOTT: 95.
02:57:07 >> Thank you.
02:57:09 And good afternoon.
02:57:26 >>ERNEST MUELLER: Assistant city attorney.
02:57:30 You have before you the a peel of the Variance Review
02:57:31 Board's denial of case VRB-09-57.
02:57:38 The property in this appeal is located at 908 east
02:57:42 25th Avenue, and the petitioners are Jason
02:57:45 Goodrich and Alexei Gonzalez.
02:57:49 The property is located in the east Tampa overlay
02:57:52 district.
02:57:52 The variance requests were to reduce the rear yard
02:57:56 setback from 15 feet to zero feet and reduce the side
02:57:59 yard setback from five feet to zero feet, to remodel
02:58:04 an existing burned structure located at the rear of
02:58:06 the property.
02:58:08 Here are some photographs that are going to depict

02:58:11 that existing structure.
02:58:15 This is the property from the front and we are talking
02:58:20 about this structure back here.
02:58:23 And here is a photograph of the same structure from
02:58:26 the back.
02:58:30 It's this structure again right here.
02:58:33 That's the property line.
02:58:38 The applicable city code is section 27-465 subsection
02:58:45 E which regulates densities and setbacks in the east
02:58:48 overlay -- East Tampa overlay district, and again if
02:58:53 council would like a section of 27-465 I can provide
02:58:56 one.
02:58:56 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Can I ask a quick question?
02:59:00 Did this come before us for a rezoning in the last few
02:59:03 years?
02:59:07 It looks really, really, really familiar.
02:59:08 >>> It looks like it does, yes.
02:59:11 I wasn't aware of that.
02:59:13 Did you want a copy of section 27-465?
02:59:17 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Yes.
02:59:17 Thank you.
02:59:39 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Any questions for Mr. Mueller?

02:59:41 >> I'll point out where the sections are and then I'll
02:59:45 turn it over.
02:59:46 Subsection 1-B of 27-465-E designates rear-yard
02:59:53 setbacks to be 15 feet and side yard setbacks to be 5
02:59:57 feet.
02:59:57 The Variance Review Board voted to deny the
03:00:00 application by a vote of 4-3 on the basis that the
03:00:04 hardship criteria had not been met.
03:00:08 As a reminder there can be no new evidence presented
03:00:11 today.
03:00:12 Your actions will be based solely upon the record
03:00:14 created at the variance review board hearing.
03:00:16 And at this time I'll turn the podium over to Mr.
03:00:20 Goodrich to present the appellant's case.
03:00:23 >> My name is Jason Goodrich.
03:00:34 I'm here today to appeal the VRB's decision a month
03:01:11 and a half ago about allowing us to remodel this
03:01:16 structure.
03:01:18 First of all, if you can see from the picture here,
03:01:22 and it is known that many of the houses within the
03:01:26 subdivision, within this area, have additional
03:01:29 structures that fit on the property line.

03:01:32 This is not my house, but it is my neighbor's house.
03:01:35 I live two doors down.
03:01:37 And I have a garage that sits on the property line.
03:01:45 In fact 11 of the 15 houses on our street have an
03:01:50 accessory structure, whether a garage, or carport, or
03:01:54 some type of building that sits on the property line.
03:02:01 When you came here originally to speak, we came here
03:02:09 to address the setbacks of the property line.
03:02:17 The new property codes do not take into consideration
03:02:20 the hundreds of structures that were already built
03:02:25 prior to these new codes coming in to play.
03:02:30 We had discussed the -- at the original meeting, we
03:02:37 had talked about the reason why we wanted to remodel
03:02:44 the structure.
03:02:45 We had spoke about the current use and the previous
03:02:51 use.
03:02:54 The hardship, I believe that we have here, we have a
03:02:57 family, we have people who are still using the
03:03:00 structure.
03:03:01 It's structurally sound.
03:03:02 It's burnt on the inside.
03:03:05 It's not about to fall over.

03:03:08 People have been in it and said, hey, it's perfect,
03:03:13 it's structurally sound.
03:03:15 The simple fact is the owners want to remodel it.
03:03:18 They want to paint the outside.
03:03:20 They want to put drywall up.
03:03:22 They want to basically just remodel the structure.
03:03:29 Previously, years ago, before 2005, this was an
03:03:35 additional structure in a rental unit for use as a
03:03:37 rental unit.
03:03:39 It had a separate meter on it.
03:03:40 It was a separate address.
03:03:43 At one point, somebody wanted to change it to --
03:03:48 change the zoning to a PD, planned unit development.
03:03:55 This is not the case here.
03:03:57 We are not interested in changing the zoning.
03:03:59 We are not interested in changing the use of the
03:04:03 building.
03:04:06 We simply want to remodel the structure.
03:04:10 Originally when Wii we came in, there was people on
03:04:14 the board, who they would not consider what we are
03:04:18 here for, which was the issue of the setbacks.
03:04:22 They only wanted to talk about the previous use.

03:04:25 It's already been established that we cannot put a
03:04:27 meter on this.
03:04:28 We have no intentions on putting a meter on this
03:04:30 building.
03:04:32 We have no intentions of putting a separate kitchen in
03:04:34 this building.
03:04:35 They have no intentions of putting whatever else they
03:04:40 need to do to make it a separate residence.
03:04:43 That is not the case at all.
03:04:45 We are simply trying to remodel the structure.
03:04:49 One with of the issues we had -- or one of the main
03:04:54 issues was the board kept continuously talking about
03:04:56 the previous use of the building.
03:04:58 It was a rental unit.
03:04:59 It was a separate place.
03:05:01 I can't stress enough that they are simply talking
03:05:05 about the wrong issue.
03:05:09 Talking about because it where it was located.
03:05:11 If we could pick this building up and move it over
03:05:14 three feet, we wouldn't be here today.
03:05:18 The second issue is the fact that somebody from the
03:05:22 community came up, Pete Johnson, claimed that he was a

03:05:27 representative from the neighborhood association.
03:05:30 Well, as I subsequently -- as I found out, he doesn't
03:05:34 live in our neighborhood.
03:05:37 And a he did not represent the neighborhood
03:05:40 association on that day.
03:05:44 He also wrote a letter telling the Variance Review
03:05:49 Board that the neighborhood association had already
03:05:55 spoke about this, and I have a copy of the letter
03:05:57 right here.
03:05:59 He put the president of the neighborhood association's
03:06:01 name on the letter as if she drafted it, which she had
03:06:05 no idea about this letter.
03:06:10 And again he came across that the neighborhood wanted
03:06:12 the building torn down, which is not the case.
03:06:15 Living two doors down from there, I can tell you, I
03:06:18 spoke to all of the neighbors around here, were all
03:06:21 very much aware of what's going on, and we could not
03:06:26 believe that our neighbor can't remodel this huge
03:06:28 structure sitting on the back of his property.
03:06:31 They can use it.
03:06:32 They can go in and out of it.
03:06:34 But it's still burnt up.

03:06:37 It still smells pretty bad in there.
03:06:43 So that is our second issue that we have with the
03:06:45 Variance Review Board's previous decision.
03:06:53 Another thing I wanted to mention was that the
03:07:01 variance -- that the decision to change the -- when a
03:07:06 property burns down or is no longer in use, they have
03:07:09 only six months before they can remodel that structure
03:07:14 or fix it back up, put it back to standards, or they
03:07:16 have to change the use, or they have to bring up the
03:07:19 current codes.
03:07:21 But somebody who recently lost a house to a fire, I
03:07:25 can tell you that it takes at least six months to get
03:07:28 through the insurance process.
03:07:32 So it really doesn't allow for even enough time to get
03:07:37 to a spot where you can have plans drawn.
03:07:48 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Council, I apologize for being out
03:07:52 of the room.
03:07:52 It appears that you have been handed things that are
03:07:54 not in the record.
03:07:55 Those are things that took place subsequent to the
03:07:58 Variance Review Board.
03:08:00 Is that correct?

03:08:01 >>> What is that?
03:08:02 >> Papers that you handed out to City Council?
03:08:04 >>> I was unaware that somebody from the regional
03:08:08 meeting came and claimed that the neighborhood
03:08:11 association was aware.
03:08:13 >>MARTIN SHELBY: So what you are saying then is what
03:08:15 you handed to them is something that was not
03:08:17 considered by the Variance Review Board?
03:08:21 >>MARY MULHERN: These are not from the petitioner.
03:08:23 These are from the neighborhood association, I
03:08:24 believe.
03:08:25 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I see.
03:08:27 I apologize.
03:08:27 >>MARY MULHERN: We just got it in our mailbox.
03:08:38 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Council, I am going to caution all
03:08:41 parties, I understand your argument, sir.
03:08:44 We can deal we've that when it comes to deliberation
03:08:46 and how best to deal with that.
03:08:48 But if you can, again, I think you are doing what you
03:08:53 are doing to set forth what the problems were with the
03:08:56 VRB with the arguments, why the VRB case is in error,
03:09:00 correct?

03:09:01 >>> Exactly.
03:09:01 >> If you could just state what that evidence -- and
03:09:04 I'm also referring to Mr. Johnson when he speaks.
03:09:07 I expect he's going to, to talk about the evidence
03:09:10 that was presented at the VRB.
03:09:12 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Marty, real quick, there's three
03:09:18 or four pieces handed to me. I looked at the date
03:09:21 November 3rd. I realized this was late evidence.
03:09:24 I didn't read it.
03:09:25 I want to hand to the you.
03:09:26 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Why don't you give it to the clerk?
03:09:31 I suspects it's probably what I have in this envelope.
03:09:33 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I will do whatever you want me to,
03:09:36 either a you or the clerk.
03:09:38 I don't think Ms. Mulhern read it either.
03:09:41 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I am going to caution council
03:09:43 against reading it.
03:09:44 If you have read it, please disregard it and not let
03:09:47 it affect your decision.
03:09:48 >>MARY MULHERN: I scanned it.
03:09:51 I disregarded it.
03:09:52 Because of the date.

03:09:52 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Thank you.
03:09:56 >>THOMAS SCOTT: For the record, I don't have that
03:09:58 evidence.
03:09:58 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Thank you.
03:10:02 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Continue.
03:10:05 >>> The simple fact is, Pete Johnson came, claimed he
03:10:08 was a representative of the neighborhood association,
03:10:14 completely blew me away.
03:10:15 He was not on any of my lists.
03:10:17 I did not find him in the neighborhood before the
03:10:19 fact.
03:10:20 I later found out that he doesn't live within ten
03:10:22 mails of the neighborhood.
03:10:24 I went to the neighborhood association.
03:10:27 They voted 13 to 1 in favor of us, allowing us to
03:10:33 remodel the structure.
03:10:35 So it was a full -- everybody was in favor of it
03:10:37 except for one person.
03:10:45 How could it possibly have been issued when I didn't
03:10:47 know the person was fabricating?
03:10:53 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Okay, sir is, if you could not talk
03:10:56 about testimony that's outside the record and about

03:11:01 what you believe --
03:11:03 Sir, what they are trying to tell you, they are
03:11:05 talking all this legal terminology.
03:11:06 You can't talk about anything --
03:11:08 >>> I understand that.
03:11:08 >> Let me finish.
03:11:10 You can't talk about anything that you did not say at
03:11:12 the variance review hearing.
03:11:15 Anything outside of what happened in the last few days
03:11:17 outside, you cannot talk about it here today.
03:11:20 You have to stay within whatever was said at that
03:11:22 meeting or that hearing.
03:11:23 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Okay.
03:11:25 I just have a quick question for the attorney.
03:11:27 If I had come to the original meeting and said that
03:11:29 the mayor was strongly behind us remodeling it, so was
03:11:35 President Obama and everybody else, and it turned out
03:11:37 it was all a lie, and I fabricated all of that, could
03:11:41 that not be construed as, hey, I misrepresented myself
03:11:45 and I had lied to the board and should that not be
03:11:48 brought up?
03:11:49 >>MARTIN SHELBY: The issue, sir -- well, you are

03:11:53 inferring a lot into that statement.
03:11:54 Whether it's a lie or whether it's a mistake.
03:11:57 Could be significant.
03:11:59 But what you are doing is what you are saying is, what
03:12:01 you are arguing to the council now is that you believe
03:12:04 is the basis of error.
03:12:05 Is that correct?
03:12:06 >>> That is one of the bases, yes.
03:12:10 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Okay.
03:12:10 Why don't you continue?
03:12:11 >>> So basically, the board made their decision based
03:12:15 on the testimony of Pete Johnson, and they also --
03:12:20 which was incorrect.
03:12:23 They did not make -- did he not make correct
03:12:26 statements.
03:12:26 He was not a representative of the neighborhood
03:12:29 association.
03:12:33 Second of all, the board also made their decision
03:12:36 based on what Steve LaBour said was previous use of
03:12:43 the building, something that had not been -- the
03:12:45 building had not been used since 2004.
03:12:51 As it turned out we are not going to be using this for

03:12:53 a separate residence.
03:12:57 In all I think that the board made a mistake.
03:13:00 It did not -- they did not look into the issues that
03:13:06 were at stake.
03:13:07 >>MARY MULHERN: Mr. Chairman, I just had a question.
03:13:14 And I don't know if you have copies.
03:13:16 We don't have a color copy of that photograph you have
03:13:18 on the overhead.
03:13:19 But I would like to leave it up there for now.
03:13:22 My question for you is, you were asking for reduction
03:13:27 and setbacks to zero on two sides.
03:13:30 Is that correct?
03:13:31 >>> Yes.
03:13:31 >>MARY MULHERN: Can you show me?
03:13:33 You pointed out all these other accessory structures
03:13:36 in your neighborhood.
03:13:40 I'm trying to tell from this.
03:13:42 It looks like some of them are.
03:13:43 But could you point which ones are zero setback on two
03:13:47 sides?
03:13:49 >>> I can tell you the one directly next door
03:13:53 definitely has.

03:13:53 I have a picture of that.
03:13:56 May I put this --
03:14:00 Put it on the overhead then.
03:14:01 >>> You can see that the pink garage in the back,
03:14:09 that's all the way to the back of the property, and
03:14:11 it's all the way to the side of the property line.
03:14:16 The red garage is also right on the property line.
03:14:20 >> If I could look at that.
03:14:26 Not that.
03:14:26 The overhead that you have.
03:14:29 That would be helpful.
03:14:31 If I could see a close-up.
03:14:37 The overhead.
03:14:40 Thank you.
03:14:50 That was all I wanted to know.
03:14:52 >> Any other questions?
03:14:55 Councilman Dingfelder.
03:14:56 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I would sort of like to nip this
03:15:01 in the bud without spend ago huge amount more time on
03:15:03 this.
03:15:04 It appears Mr. Johnson, I think, sat in the past in
03:15:09 front of this body and there isn't any new evidence,

03:15:15 and he couldn't live in the city limits anymore, I
03:15:17 think he's in Temple Terrace now.
03:15:19 And he's saying yes.
03:15:20 So it appears there's some controversy as related to
03:15:26 what he said and how he said it to the VRB.
03:15:29 And I am not going to get into the accuracy of that or
03:15:31 not because that's not our role.
03:15:33 But I think if there was any type of confusion, then
03:15:38 that raises an issue of due process.
03:15:41 And I think that what we need to do -- and I have
03:15:44 conferred with Marty already on this -- is due process
03:15:47 is one of the key issues in our appeal.
03:15:49 I think we need to remand it back to the VRB, make
03:15:54 them address this issue of Pete and what role he was
03:15:58 playing and whether or not his role was consistent
03:16:00 with that neighborhood association that he said he was
03:16:03 speaking for, because that's in the transcript.
03:16:05 And address that issue, clarify that issue.
03:16:07 If they want to stick to where they were before, fine.
03:16:10 If they can clean up that part of the record, and then
03:16:13 if it comes back it comes back.
03:16:14 If it doesn't, it doesn't.

03:16:16 So that would be -- that's my suggestion.
03:16:19 I would like to move it as a motion but I'm open for
03:16:22 comments.
03:16:22 >>GWEN MILLER: I would like to ask a question.
03:16:25 I have a letter from the neighborhood association.
03:16:29 >>MARTIN SHELBY: That came in after the VRB that I am
03:16:33 asking to you exclude.
03:16:35 >>GWEN MILLER: No, this one is before.
03:16:36 >>THOMAS SCOTT: This letter is in the back.
03:16:42 What's the date?
03:16:43 >>GWEN MILLER: October 12, 2009.
03:16:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: That's too late.
03:16:46 >>MARTIN SHELBY: The hearing was on August 11th.
03:16:50 >>GWEN MILLER: And they met and supported it.
03:16:52 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: See, that's all after the hearing.
03:16:55 Marty is telling us not to address that.
03:16:57 That's the kind of issue that the VRB needs to
03:16:59 address.
03:17:00 They need to address that and it's not our place.
03:17:02 >>GWEN MILLER: They did not get this to the VRB?
03:17:06 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: No, it was too late.
03:17:07 The hearing was in August.

03:17:08 >>MARTIN SHELBY: It was submitted by the applicant.
03:17:14 The petitioner.
03:17:15 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Somebody sent it to us.
03:17:18 Maybe the VRB people sent it to us.
03:17:21 >>MARTIN SHELBY: It appears to me clearly that the
03:17:23 record here is rather corrupted.
03:17:26 >>THOMAS SCOTT: It's really mess up.
03:17:30 I want to tell you, we got this in the backup.
03:17:34 October 12th.
03:17:35 But it's part of the backup material.
03:17:36 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: The backup provided by the
03:17:39 petitioner.
03:17:39 So he gave it --
03:17:41 No, no, this came off -- off line.
03:17:45 >>MARTIN SHELBY: The petitioner put together the
03:17:49 transcript and the packet and provides that to the
03:17:53 clerk which is then distributed to City Council.
03:17:55 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Well, in that case it's more
03:18:00 corrupted.
03:18:00 >>MARY MULHERN: I was going to ignore all of that
03:18:07 even though I did peek at that, and I'm not sure if
03:18:12 the letters are also in my packet here.

03:18:14 But I feel that there is enough -- ignoring all of
03:18:22 that, regardless of all of that, I would be ready to
03:18:28 overturn the VRB's decision based on there not being
03:18:36 competent substantial evidence against it, and due
03:18:41 process.
03:18:42 So I don't think we need to remand it.
03:18:44 I think it's correct for us to deal with it --
03:18:49 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Council, let me just share with you,
03:18:52 council, the other concern that needs to be taken into
03:18:58 account is that a lot of this relates to Pete Johnson,
03:19:01 and Mr. Johnson is here today.
03:19:02 He hasn't had a chance to address it.
03:19:06 That being the case, the issue is that even if the
03:19:09 issue is competent, substantial evidence, if due
03:19:13 process is not afford ohed, it's still an error to be
03:19:18 able to take --
03:19:21 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay.
03:19:22 I shouldn't have added what you were saying, because
03:19:24 that isn't what I'm talking -- I wouldn't base my
03:19:27 decision -- we don't have to meet all three of these
03:19:29 standards.
03:19:30 We do, all three?

03:19:33 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Absolutely.
03:19:34 Yes.
03:19:35 The three things in order to -- in order for a
03:19:40 decision to be upheld had, there has to be three
03:19:43 things.
03:19:43 It has to be based on competent substantial evidence.
03:19:45 >>MARY MULHERN: I'm saying -- I'm not -- what about
03:19:48 overturning it?
03:19:49 Same?
03:19:50 >>MARTIN SHELBY: It has to be an error that affects
03:19:53 one of those.
03:19:54 >>MARY MULHERN: Right.
03:19:57 That's what I'm saying.
03:19:58 I don't feel -- let me finish what I'm thinking.
03:20:01 Looking at that photograph, I don't feel there was
03:20:03 competent substantial evidence to deny it based on the
03:20:09 fact that the rest of the neighborhood, all the other
03:20:12 houses have the zero setbacks accessory structures.
03:20:15 So he's asking for a variance.
03:20:17 But if it's in a neighborhood where people seem to
03:20:21 have had that.
03:20:23 So even without any discussion of due process, if I

03:20:28 can do it based on -- make a motion based on that, I
03:20:31 would.
03:20:34 But I'll do whatever --
03:20:38 >>> 11 of the 15 houses.
03:20:39 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Wait, sir.
03:20:42 You can sit down.
03:20:43 Okay.
03:20:43 Take your seat.
03:20:44 >>MARTIN SHELBY: My suggestion, council, is if that's
03:20:48 inclination of at least one council member, hear from
03:20:51 Mr. Johnson, whoever else wants to speak, give the
03:20:53 petitioner a chance at rebuttal, and then we'll see
03:20:56 where we stand.
03:20:57 At least you will have a complete record of a complete
03:20:59 hearing.
03:20:59 >> Thank you.
03:21:03 Does anyone from the public wish to address council?
03:21:05 You have three minutes.
03:21:06 State your name and address for the record.
03:21:07 Anyone from the public.
03:21:08 >> Pete Johnson, 301 Druid hills road, Temple Terrace,
03:21:14 Florida.

03:21:14 Number one, do you not have to be a resident of the
03:21:17 City of Tampa to be a member of any home association
03:21:21 whatsoever.
03:21:22 I have clarified that.
03:21:24 Shannon Edge's office so many times it's ridiculous.
03:21:27 Number two.
03:21:28 The quality of life factors that affect the people in
03:21:31 Temple Terrace affect me, too.
03:21:33 >> Mr. Johnson, excuse me.
03:21:37 You have to stick to the record.
03:21:41 You have to be on the record.
03:21:42 >>> Okay.
03:21:46 First thing that is on the record, the owner is an
03:21:51 out-of-town owner.
03:21:52 Okay?
03:21:54 On the record, we were concerned that at the last PD
03:22:00 was, we were concerned of people moving into this
03:22:03 structure and living in it.
03:22:05 Okay.
03:22:07 On the record, I have had people that lived in six by
03:22:13 eight wooden sheds in that neighborhood that I have
03:22:16 had to have removed.

03:22:18 There are no plans for this.
03:22:22 His plans were not approved.
03:22:23 They were picked up in June and never returned.
03:22:27 Basically, I feel if you approve this that being that
03:22:31 it's an out of town owner, the code can't watch it all
03:22:34 the time, someone is going to move in there,
03:22:36 especially in this poor neighborhood, and that's where
03:22:39 we have the drug dealers living in, that's where we
03:22:41 have the prostitutes living in, and I just think it's
03:22:44 going to be a deprivation of the neighborhood,
03:22:49 regardless of what the Board said.
03:22:49 And I'm sorry about the papers getting out to you.
03:22:52 They were meant to be held until after the meeting.
03:22:54 Thank you.
03:22:54 >> Thank you.
03:22:55 Anyone else from the public?
03:22:56 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I have a question.
03:22:58 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Let's wait and see.
03:23:02 >>> Kim Hyland, 1001 East 24th Avenue.
03:23:09 I am the president of the neighborhood association.
03:23:10 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Did you testify at the --
03:23:15 >>> No.

03:23:16 Can I not testify now?
03:23:18 >>MARTIN SHELBY: No.
03:23:19 >>THOMAS SCOTT: I'm sorry, I thought if they were a
03:23:22 party of record they have to stick to the record.
03:23:23 That's not accurate?
03:23:26 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: She wasn't there.
03:23:27 >>THOMAS SCOTT: You are a party of record.
03:23:28 You are party of record.
03:23:29 You can speak at an appeal if you are party of record.
03:23:32 But you have to speak to what's on the record.
03:23:35 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: You are right at the county.
03:23:43 I think our rules are slightly different.
03:23:44 >>> Her name was put on a letter provided by Pete
03:23:50 Johnson that she was unaware of.
03:23:52 So in a sense, she was present at the meeting without
03:23:56 even really knowing it.
03:23:57 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Well, in this case I am going to
03:24:03 listen to the attorneys.
03:24:05 So thank you.
03:24:06 Anyone else from the public?
03:24:07 Okay then.
03:24:09 Yes, you have rebuttal.

03:24:10 >> I don't know where he's getting off that we didn't
03:24:15 have plans.
03:24:16 We have detailed plans showing that this is not going
03:24:19 to be an additional house on the back of a property,
03:24:24 that weighed plans with no kitchens, without closets.
03:24:30 Living two doors down, the house there is very small.
03:24:37 If someone would tear down my garage I don't know
03:24:40 where I would put half my stuff.
03:24:42 I don't know what else to say.
03:24:43 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Council, before making a motion let
03:24:50 me also clarify.
03:24:52 The city attorney, I do have a concern.
03:24:56 Listen to what I am about to say.
03:24:57 I do have a concern.
03:24:58 In the backup, we do have this letter.
03:25:00 Linda just verified it is out on the -- online.
03:25:06 My backup office, she verified this came in.
03:25:10 Now, that raises a big concern for me, if we are
03:25:14 attaching information that was not a part of the
03:25:16 record, then we have some concerns here.
03:25:20 Do you understand what I'm saying?
03:25:24 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I do.

03:25:25 >>> At some point in the process the information
03:25:28 became part of the record that was not presented to
03:25:32 you all.
03:25:33 That would be a concern, obviously.
03:25:34 >>THOMAS SCOTT: That's my concern.
03:25:38 At least for me.
03:25:39 I get my information -- she doesn't provide it.
03:25:44 We get it off the -- is it online?
03:25:47 All this stuff is printed -- all the backup material.
03:25:50 So we have got -- I guess the clerk must put it out.
03:25:55 And they get it from wherever.
03:25:56 >>MARTIN SHELBY: They get it from the petitioner.
03:25:58 The petitioner prepares it.
03:25:59 >>THOMAS SCOTT: That's why you need a hearing
03:26:09 officer.
03:26:09 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay.
03:26:13 I'm going to try to do this.
03:26:18 I'm sorry.
03:26:19 I'll move to close the public hearing.
03:26:20 >> Second.
03:26:21 >> All in favor signify by saying Aye.
03:26:25 Opposed?

03:26:25 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay.
03:26:27 I think even since I left, the record has gotten
03:26:30 muddier.
03:26:31 I'm going to second Mr. Dingfelder's motion to remand
03:26:36 this back to the VRB, because we don't have any
03:26:41 other -- I don't know what other option we have.
03:26:49 I don't know what else we can do when we are putting
03:26:53 ourselves by voting by making a decision, putting
03:27:00 ourselves in a position where we know that the record
03:27:03 may not uphold our decision.
03:27:08 Does that make any -- you know what I mean?
03:27:10 I want to follow your recommendation.
03:27:12 >>MARTIN SHELBY: There's several ways you can go,
03:27:16 council.
03:27:16 But obviously the basis for the remand -- and Mr.
03:27:21 Fletcher mentioned this, and I do agree with him --
03:27:23 the basis for the remand cannot be the fact about Mr.
03:27:30 Johnson, whether he represented the homeowners
03:27:36 association.
03:27:37 >>MARY MULHERN: No.
03:27:38 That's not the -- you tell me if this could be the
03:27:41 basis of the remand.

03:27:42 The fact that we have had new testimony and new
03:27:50 evidence presented here today which raises questions
03:27:56 of due process.
03:27:58 So I don't feel -- I think that it would be better to
03:28:02 remand it back to the Variance Review Board, because
03:28:06 they would have --
03:28:08 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Let me clarify my motion.
03:28:10 It's also a function of competent evidence.
03:28:12 If the evidence they heard from Mr. Johnson might be
03:28:15 tainted or otherwise not competent, that's one of our
03:28:18 three prongs.
03:28:19 So I think between the two of due process, incompetent
03:28:22 evidence, we have plenty of reason to send it back and
03:28:24 let them clean it up on that issue.
03:28:28 That's my motion.
03:28:29 >> I second it.
03:28:30 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: I call the question,
03:28:32 Mr. Chairman.
03:28:32 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Okay.
03:28:35 I have a motion to remand it back.
03:28:42 Can we limit the scope or just have a full-blown
03:28:44 hearing on it?

03:28:50 You can remand it back.
03:28:52 Now the scope of what you want them to look at, is
03:28:54 that right?
03:28:56 >>ERNEST MUELLER: Could you remand it back with
03:28:57 direction or just remand it back without direction.
03:29:02 Your choice.
03:29:02 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I think to the extent -- I would
03:29:08 agree that it should be remanded back on that limited
03:29:11 basis, that there was testimony about how the
03:29:14 neighborhood felt about it, and I think they need to
03:29:18 get clarification about who speaks for the
03:29:20 neighborhood, and how that neighborhood really feels
03:29:23 about it.
03:29:24 And Mr. Johnson can testify all he wants in any
03:29:27 capacity he wants.
03:29:28 But they need to tighten up on who he's speaking for
03:29:32 and if that's real.
03:29:33 >>ERNEST MUELLER: I think it would be better if you
03:29:36 remand it back based on competent substantial evidence
03:29:39 and the due process issues, I think just remand it
03:29:43 back without direction, let the Variance Review Board
03:29:48 hear the case anew.

03:29:50 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Thank you.
03:29:52 Motion and second.
03:29:53 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
03:29:55 Opposes?
03:29:57 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Caetano voting no.
03:30:07 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: So when are we going to get it
03:30:09 back, about eight months?
03:30:10 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: We have to vote on the case during
03:30:18 lunch, it was a closed hearing.
03:30:19 >>MARY MULHERN: We continued that.
03:30:23 >>GWEN MILLER: Okay.
03:30:25 Then that will conclude then all of our items on the
03:30:28 agenda.
03:30:29 We will move now to new business.
03:30:35 Mr. Dingfelder.
03:30:36 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
03:30:38 As your representative on the Hart bus board, I'm
03:30:42 pleased to announce that Hart attained the Florida
03:30:45 public transportation system of the year award.
03:30:49 And I think Mr. Amelio and his staff are doing a good
03:30:54 job which is important as we come into this next year
03:30:56 and the proposed referendum.

03:30:58 With that I would like to bring David and his senior
03:31:03 staff over to get the commendation about that award.
03:31:06 >> Second.
03:31:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Schedule that for an appropriate
03:31:13 date.
03:31:13 >>THOMAS SCOTT: We can talk about that.
03:31:16 There are a number of issues.
03:31:17 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: If they come we can do it at the
03:31:21 same time.
03:31:21 >> There's a motion and second.
03:31:23 All in favor?
03:31:24 Opposes?
03:31:25 Okay.
03:31:28 Councilwoman Mulhern.
03:31:29 >>MARY MULHERN: Mr. Chairman, I have a resolution,
03:31:33 Mr. Shelby.
03:31:33 I might need some direction.
03:31:40 Can I move this resolution today?
03:31:42 Or is this something I need to put on the agenda?
03:31:44 For the Regional Planning Council?
03:31:46 >>MARTIN SHELBY: You have already previously
03:31:48 distributed it to City Council.

03:31:49 I don't know whether City Council had an opportunity
03:31:51 to look at it.
03:31:52 It's regarding the RPC hosting the 2012 conference.
03:31:58 >>MARY MULHERN: Yes.
03:31:59 >>MARTIN SHELBY: The only thing I would raise, Mrs.
03:32:02 Mulhern, is within the body of the whereas clauses, it
03:32:05 expresses council's desire to contribute $2,000
03:32:10 towards the cost of posting that.
03:32:12 >>MARY MULHERN: Let me, instead of bringing up a
03:32:16 resolution, put this on the agenda.
03:32:18 If I put it on the agenda for our next meeting to
03:32:21 discuss whether we would like to do that?
03:32:24 It is to support the Tampa Bay Regional Planning
03:32:25 Council as host of the 2012 national association of
03:32:30 regional council's annual conference, which I am very
03:32:33 much in support of, but they are also asking the Tampa
03:32:37 City Council to support the council by $2,000 in
03:32:44 fiscal year 2010, and I'm sure they are asking the
03:32:47 other cities and counties in the region to do that.
03:32:50 But that's for discussion.
03:32:55 The next meeting.
03:32:55 >> That's the next meeting?

03:32:57 It's been moved and seconded.
03:32:59 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
03:33:01 Opposes?
03:33:02 >>MARY MULHERN: That's all I have.
03:33:03 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
03:33:05 As you well know, the New York Yankees, which
03:33:08 everybody a great asset to the city for many years,
03:33:11 just won their 27th world championship.
03:33:15 I would like to have a commendation drawn up to that
03:33:18 effect.
03:33:22 Thank the Yankee organization, the boss and his family
03:33:27 for the contribution they made to the city.
03:33:30 >> Second.
03:33:31 >> Second.
03:33:31 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: And since the funds are short I am
03:33:36 going to Chip in a couple of dollars to buy them a
03:33:38 nice trophy which could be from two inches to two feet
03:33:41 depending on how far my funds run.
03:33:44 We are very proud of their accomplishments.
03:33:46 But mostly we are proud of the way they act and the
03:33:49 way they run that team.
03:33:52 You have to have short hair.

03:33:54 I guess I could fit into the Yankees pretty good.
03:33:56 And they do a great job, the community, no matter
03:34:04 where they are at.
03:34:05 That's number one.
03:34:05 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Moved and seconded.
03:34:09 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
03:34:10 >>CHARLIE MIRANDA: And the Hispanic operation we had,
03:34:14 it was real nice at the Tampa Theatre.
03:34:17 Frank Garcia, friend of mine, he's one of the guys
03:34:20 that goes out for months at a time, gets these
03:34:22 fossils, and I don't know where he finds them but he
03:34:26 has more fossils, I think, than any human being
03:34:29 around.
03:34:29 Wrote this wonderful song.
03:34:31 And -- is that it?
03:34:34 Maybe Linda can do the -- it means part of Tampa.
03:34:42 We would like to offer him a commendation for the work
03:34:44 that he's done.
03:34:48 >> Moved and seconded.
03:34:51 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
03:34:52 >>MARY MULHERN: Do we all get the CD?
03:34:56 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I guarantee it will stick in your

03:35:01 mind.
03:35:01 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Ms. Miller?
03:35:06 >>GWEN MILLER: Thank you.
03:35:06 I would like to make a motion that we ask the legal
03:35:09 department to look at the legal nonconforming sign
03:35:12 code and make a recommendation regarding what changes
03:35:17 they need to make.
03:35:19 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Nonconforming signs so they can be
03:35:23 repaired?
03:35:23 My thought is if they are not conforming -- they
03:35:27 should go away.
03:35:27 >>GWEN MILLER: Either change them or --
03:35:31 Well, the question is put it on the agenda for
03:35:33 discussion.
03:35:33 Right?
03:35:34 >>GWEN MILLER: Right.
03:35:35 Legal department.
03:35:37 To decide what they would like to do.
03:35:38 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Well, it's a policy discussion and
03:35:41 I think it's our discussion.
03:35:42 We then direct them.
03:35:43 Then explain where we are now and we can direct them.

03:35:52 Next meeting in two weeks.
03:35:53 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Okay.
03:35:54 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Mr. Chairman, I don't know whether
03:35:57 you intend to bring up that new business but you have
03:36:00 a 30-minute presentation.
03:36:01 And one of the concerns is adding staff reports, if
03:36:05 you wish to have that discussion, that's fine.
03:36:06 I want to bring it to your attention.
03:36:08 >> I'll bring it up.
03:36:09 Thank you.
03:36:10 Moved and seconded.
03:36:11 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
03:36:14 And is that something that we can carry over to
03:36:17 December?
03:36:19 First meeting in December?
03:36:21 Carry it to the first meeting in December.
03:36:23 Okay.
03:36:23 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
03:36:28 This morning, the young woman who is working on
03:36:31 climate change provided us a resolution, which is a
03:36:36 symbolic resolution encouraging the City Council would
03:36:39 encourage the Florida representatives on the U.S.

03:36:42 Senate to support it.
03:36:48 I would like to do that.
03:36:49 >> Second.
03:36:51 >>MARY MULHERN: I just want to say that I have been
03:36:55 to a couple of conferences, the most convincing one
03:36:59 that this is so important to happen before the
03:37:02 Copenhagen meeting, the national security conference,
03:37:06 with two Republican senators, former senator John
03:37:12 Warner and Connie Mack.
03:37:14 I them he was Republican.
03:37:16 And an admiral who said this is the most important
03:37:19 thing for the U.S., for our national security
03:37:21 interest, for us to pass this before that conference,
03:37:24 which is coming up in December.
03:37:25 So thank you, Linda.
03:37:27 >> Moved and seconded.
03:37:28 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Just in looking at that, at the
03:37:34 resolution that they handed out, I would like, Marty,
03:37:37 to clean it up a little bit.
03:37:38 I think it talks about that the seas will rise X
03:37:42 number of inches, based upon this one report and that
03:37:45 sort of thing.

03:37:45 I think it's too specific.
03:37:47 I think we can all acknowledge that there's concern
03:37:49 that the seas will rise and there's concern that the
03:37:51 heat will rise, and also I think there's concern about
03:37:55 the military and security aspects of that, we should
03:38:02 be energy independent.
03:38:03 We should add that as a clause.
03:38:05 Maybe Marty --
03:38:07 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I amend my motion that Mr. Shelby
03:38:12 will bring it back to us with that language for next
03:38:15 Thursday.
03:38:16 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Did you want it for the next regular
03:38:20 meeting for City Council?
03:38:21 Because next week you have a CRA.
03:38:23 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thursday night at 6:00.
03:38:27 >> Moved and seconded.
03:38:29 All in favor?
03:38:30 Opposes?
03:38:32 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: On article 85 this morning, the
03:38:35 human rights ordinance, I voted no.
03:38:37 I want to change my vote.
03:38:39 I didn't want to discriminate.

03:38:41 I wanted to see language in there about cross dressing
03:38:43 but evidently it didn't pass muster.
03:38:46 So make that a unanimous vote.
03:38:48 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Okay.
03:38:52 So a vote for reconsideration.
03:38:54 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Bring him into the fold.
03:39:00 I move to reconsider on behalf of --
03:39:08 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Do we have a motion?
03:39:15 >>THOMAS SCOTT: All in favor of reconsideration say
03:39:17 Aye.
03:39:18 Opposes?
03:39:20 >>MARTIN SHELBY: That number off the agenda is 85.
03:39:22 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'll move 85 again and it already
03:39:25 been read.
03:39:26 Mr. Shelby.
03:39:27 I move 85 again.
03:39:28 It's already been read.
03:39:29 >> Moved and seconded.
03:39:32 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
03:39:33 >>MARTIN SHELBY: If you can, madam clerk, announce it
03:39:43 because it will have to come back for a second reading
03:39:45 at a public hearing, and that will be --

03:39:46 >>THE CLERK: The motion carried unanimously.
03:39:49 Second reading of the ordinance will be held November
03:39:51 the 19th at 9:30 a.m.
03:39:54 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Okay.
03:39:55 Let me wrap this up here.
03:39:56 We have a request, a letter of congratulations from
03:40:00 City Council to Candice Huntley who is retiring from
03:40:06 the Hillsborough County legislative delegation,
03:40:08 December 31st, 09, after 35 years.
03:40:11 So we will need a letter.
03:40:15 Moved.
03:40:17 >>GWEN MILLER: All in favor of the motion say Aye.
03:40:20 Opposed, Nay.
03:40:20 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Then the item I want to place on the
03:40:25 agenda for the 19th at 11:00.
03:40:28 This is bringing to us the executive report and the
03:40:32 recommendation from the transportation task force,
03:40:37 30-minute presentation.
03:40:39 >> That's a long time.
03:40:45 >> Well, we are going to provide executive service but
03:40:48 I think what's more important is they are going to
03:40:50 show you the whole light rail component, where it's

03:40:52 going, where it's not going, whatever, and all that
03:40:55 stuff.
03:40:56 I mean, it don't have to take 30 minutes but I thought
03:40:58 you might be interested.
03:40:59 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: We are real interested.
03:41:02 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Four of the city council members
03:41:07 are members of the lead team.
03:41:08 >>MARY MULHERN: I've seen it twice.
03:41:12 >> 15 minutes.
03:41:15 >> All right.
03:41:16 15 minutes.
03:41:16 Okay.
03:41:17 Fine.
03:41:18 Okay.
03:41:19 >>GWEN MILLER: Motion and second.
03:41:22 All in favor say Aye.
03:41:23 Opposed, Nay.
03:41:24 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I'm sorry to interrupt.
03:41:25 But you had mentioned in your memo about a resolution.
03:41:28 >> Yes.
03:41:29 And that is I would like for the county attorney to,
03:41:33 once the county has voted, my understanding December

03:41:36 2nd they'll vote on the resolution, they are
03:41:40 bringing back on the 2nd a resolution, the intent
03:41:43 of a resolution, place on the ballot, the language.
03:41:46 So what I would like you to do is bring it back to our
03:41:50 first meeting in December, or second meeting, the
03:41:52 resolution to support, place the item.
03:41:56 >>MARTIN SHELBY: What -- would you like me to obtain
03:42:01 the county's, and based on that bring something that
03:42:04 City Council can then entertain, pass on?
03:42:07 >> The resolution, yes.
03:42:08 >>GWEN MILLER: Motion and second.
03:42:09 All in favor of that motion say Aye.
03:42:11 Opposed, Nay.
03:42:11 >> One last thing here.
03:42:13 And Hartline requested before City Council to make a
03:42:21 presentation on transit or --
03:42:27 >>GWEN MILLER: When?
03:42:28 >> I don't know.
03:42:29 My understanding is they want to bring --
03:42:35 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: The expert from out of town?
03:42:38 >> Yes, that's what they are saying.
03:42:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Do we have any other related -- I

03:42:44 mean, this is about the rail and --
03:42:49 My position was, all the issues like what the MPO was
03:42:53 going to do today.
03:42:54 All of its related.
03:42:56 MPO, transportation task force --
03:42:59 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: If you want to bundle it together,
03:43:01 that justifies 30 minutes.
03:43:02 >> That's going to be my suggestion.
03:43:04 Put it all together.
03:43:05 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'll second your motion on that.
03:43:08 >>GWEN MILLER: All in favor of the motion say Aye.
03:43:10 Opposed, Nay.
03:43:10 >>THOMAS SCOTT: So you all understand the motion
03:43:13 then.
03:43:14 You can make a presentation of the commendation.
03:43:17 Anything else?
03:43:18 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Yes.
03:43:19 You just made a motion to put all these items on the
03:43:25 9th at 11:00.
03:43:27 And who will be responsible?
03:43:28 Is somebody taking responsibility for making the
03:43:30 invitations for the 19th?

03:43:33 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Linda can coordinate it, I guess.
03:43:40 Anything else?
03:43:42 Anything else that needs to come before --
03:43:48 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: So moved.
03:43:50 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Second.
03:43:50 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Move to receive and file.
03:43:54 All in favor signify by saying Aye.
03:43:56 Okay.
03:43:58 Anything else need to come before council?
03:44:00 Okay.
03:44:01 Now, public comments.
03:44:02 Items not on the agenda.
03:44:03 (The meeting adjourned at 3:44 p.m.)

The preceding represents an unedited version of
realtime captioning which should neither be relied
upon for complete accuracy nor used as a verbatim
The original of this file was produced in all capital
letters and any variation thereto may be a result of
third party edits and software compatibility issues.
Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the
proceedings may need to hire a court reporter.