Help & information    View the list of Transcripts



Thursday, December 10, 2009


The following represents an unedited version of
realtime captioning which should neither be relied upon
for complete accuracy nor used as a verbatim
The original of this file was produced in all capital
letters and any variation thereto may be a result of
third party edits and software compatibility issues.
Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the
proceedings may need to hire a court reporter.

11:01:28 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Tampa City Council will come to order.

11:01:29 >> Roll call.

11:01:31 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: Here.

11:01:32 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Here.

11:01:33 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Here.

11:01:37 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Here.

11:01:37 Have a letter from Councilman Miranda.

11:01:42 Please be advised that I will be unable to attend the

11:01:44 workshop on December the 10th, 2009 at 11:00 a.m. due

11:01:49 to a family illness.

11:01:51 Please see that the reason for my absence is read into

11:01:54 the record.

11:01:55 Thank you.

11:01:55 Turn to Councilwoman Miller.

11:02:03 Presentation for the police Officer of the Month.

11:02:17 >>GWEN MILLER: Good morning, council.

11:02:18 It is my honor today to present our Officer of the

11:02:21 Month, which is Detective Melanie Holder.

11:02:26 I'm going to turn it over to Chief Castor and she will

11:02:28 tell us why Melanie is the Officer of the Month.

11:02:32 >> Good morning, Council.

11:02:32 As it is every month, it is my honor to present the

11:02:36 Officer of the Month for December 2009.

11:02:38 Melanie Holder is a detective in the Sex Crimes and

11:02:41 Family Violence Unit at the Tampa Police Department.

11:02:43 She's held that assignment for quite some time, which I

11:02:46 personally think is the most difficult assignment in

11:02:49 the police department, because one, you have to deal

11:02:51 with these victims whose lives have been destroyed.

11:02:54 And you also have to deal with the worst elements of

11:02:59 society with the suspects and defendants in these

11:03:02 cases.

11:03:03 Melanie is an outstanding investigator.

11:03:06 She also has a great personality, which allows her to

11:03:10 give comfort to the victims, to put them at ease so

11:03:14 they can give the information that she needs.

11:03:16 And also, she's able to build rapport with the

11:03:19 suspects, which usually leads in her cases to a

11:03:22 confession.

11:03:22 We are recognizing her this month for a particular case

11:03:26 that she investigated, which was a very, very brutal

11:03:30 home invasion and sexual assault.

11:03:33 She did a neighborhood canvass, was able to find a

11:03:36 maintenance worker who led her to a witness who was

11:03:39 very reluctant and deceitful.

11:03:43 Through her abilities to build a rapport, she got

11:03:47 information from this witness that led to two possible

11:03:50 suspects.

11:03:51 She immediately put out a bulletin statewide, located

11:03:54 one of the individuals in Gainesville.

11:03:56 She drove to Gainesville the next day, interviewed the

11:03:59 individual, led to the second suspect.

11:04:02 Got confessions from both of them and they plead guilty

11:04:06 and are now in prison and off the streets of our

11:04:09 community.

11:04:10 So, that's just one of the investigations that she's

11:04:13 being recognized for.

11:04:14 She handles a lot of the high-profile cases that are

11:04:19 assigned to that unit.

11:04:20 Each of the investigators is outstanding, but Melanie

11:04:24 tends to catch all those really tough cases.

11:04:27 She handles a case load of approximately 30

11:04:29 investigations a month.

11:04:30 And she's able to investigate those, ensure that

11:04:36 they're truthful and then take them to successful

11:04:41 conclusion, which I said usually results in a

11:04:43 confession.

11:04:43 So she's being recognized for this particular case and

11:04:47 for everything else she does every day to keep our

11:04:49 community safe.

11:04:51 As the Tampa Police Department Officer of the Month for

11:04:53 December 2009.

11:04:56 [ Applause ]

11:05:02 >>GWEN MILLER: On behalf of the Tampa City Council, I'd

11:05:04 like to present you this commendation.

11:05:06 Not going to read it because Chief said all those

11:05:09 wonderful things you have done.

11:05:09 We are so proud of you.

11:05:11 I will just present it to you.

11:05:12 >> Thank you.

11:05:12 >> At this time, the public sector is going to give you

11:05:15 some gifts.

11:05:16 The first one is from Charlie's Steakhouse, a gift

11:05:19 certificate.

11:05:19 And you're going to get some more.

11:05:22 >> Thank you.

11:05:24 >> Good morning.

11:05:25 Danny Lewis from Bill Currie Ford, representing the

11:05:28 Bill Currie family.

11:05:29 It's always an honor to come down here, but it's really

11:05:32 special -- I remember Melanie 15 years ago, I was on

11:05:37 the board of directors of PAL.

11:05:39 Melanie was assigned there, and I heard all the same

11:05:42 attributes.

11:05:42 Great personality, dedication of duty, caring.

11:05:45 It is so good to see you honored today.

11:05:49 >> Good to see you.

11:05:51 Thank you.

11:05:54 >> Good morning.

11:05:55 On behalf of Tampa's Lowry Park Zoo, want to present to

11:05:58 you a couple of passes, so you can enjoy the zoo at

11:06:01 your leisure.

11:06:03 >> Thank you.

11:06:03 We always enjoy the zoo.

11:06:06 >> Congratulations.

11:06:07 I'm Steve Stickley with Stepps Towing Service.

11:06:10 On behalf of Jim and Judy and Sod Stepp, we'd like to

11:06:14 present this trophy.

11:06:14 Over the years, I have been trying to get them to

11:06:17 change the gender so I have a male and a female statue.

11:06:24 And also have a gift certificate to Leroy Selmon.

11:06:30 >> Thank you.

11:06:30 I ate there yesterday.

11:06:32 >> Jimmy Meyer from the Tampa PBA.

11:06:35 Gift certificate for your pleasure spending, perhaps

11:06:39 Bobby.

11:06:39 But also other reasons you will be getting award, one

11:06:43 of the very few successful police marriages.

11:06:47 Bobby Holder of the police department too.

11:06:49 So congratulations to yourself and also Bobby.

11:06:51 It's a joint effort.

11:06:54 >> Thank you.

11:06:58 >> Here's a dozen roses.

11:07:00 Normally I give it to the officer and he gives it to

11:07:03 his significant other.

11:07:07 >> Thank you, I won't change the tradition.

11:07:09 I'll give it to my husband.

11:07:11 [ Laughter ]

11:07:12 >> Thank you so much.

11:07:17 >> I came prepared.

11:07:18 I have got two tee shirts.

11:07:20 So you get the choice.

11:07:22 You get either the Rigatoni green or the Rigatoni's

11:07:28 blue.

11:07:28 >> Thank you so much.

11:07:29 >> On behalf of Rigatoni's they're providing you with a

11:07:33 gift certificate so you can enjoy lunch or dinner.

11:07:36 On behalf of Bryn-Alan Studios, a gift certificate to

11:07:41 have your pictures taken.

11:07:42 >> I love pictures.

11:07:43 >> As long as you're in them and not on the wall.

11:07:46 >> That's true. As long as they're not at the post

11:07:48 office.

11:07:48 >> Good.

11:07:49 You can go and have dinner at Bern's.

11:07:54 Can't take him though.

11:07:55 Take your boyfriend -- I'm sorry.

11:07:57 [ Laughter ]

11:07:58 >> Take whoever you would like.

11:08:00 This is for you and your family.

11:08:02 And on behalf of everyone involved here, we greatly

11:08:06 appreciate what you do and certainly these folks over

11:08:09 here know you personally.

11:08:10 I don't know you that well, but congratulations. And

11:08:13 we appreciate what you do for this community.

11:08:15 >> Thank you.

11:08:17 >>GWEN MILLER: It's your turn now.

11:08:19 >> First of all, I'd like to thank City Council, Chief,

11:08:24 and all of the great gifts and thank you for the

11:08:26 recognition.

11:08:27 Obviously, we don't do it for the recognition.

11:08:29 We do it because we love the City of Tampa and the job

11:08:32 that we do.

11:08:33 I want to recognize my family, my husband, Lieutenant

11:08:37 Bobby Holder with the Tampa Police Department, my

11:08:39 mother, Shirley Woods, my sister Sonia Shepherd from

11:08:42 the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office.

11:08:44 And my brother-in-law Lieutenant Shepherd from the

11:08:47 Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office.

11:08:48 So we kept it all in the family.

11:08:50 And my mother has prayed for us our entire career.

11:08:53 I think that's what has kept us safe throughout the

11:08:56 city.

11:08:56 So thank you for your recognition.

11:08:59 [ Applause ]

11:09:30 >> Take up item two at this time.

11:09:33 This is the discussion relative to drought-tolerant and

11:09:40 sustainable plants.

11:09:41 Initiated by councilor Mulhern and Saul-Sena.

11:09:51 I don't know if they want to wait for the presentation

11:09:54 first.

11:09:56 >> Good morning, City Council.

11:09:58 Karen Palus, Parks and Recreation Director.

11:10:00 I am here this morning to talk about our sustainability

11:10:03 report that was requested by Council regarding a

11:10:07 Florida-friendly plant list as well as any information

11:10:10 regarding some machinery and uses within our park

11:10:14 system.

11:10:14 I have provided Council a copy of, just an overall

11:10:18 quick report that outlines what I will talk briefly

11:10:22 about this morning.

11:10:22 The next item is an overall draft, the list of the

11:10:26 under faced plant list that goes into Florida-friendly

11:10:31 plants.

11:10:32 And I also brought a Power Point.

11:10:34 It's very similar to the one you have seen back in June

11:10:37 that we presented regarding Florida-friendly yards.

11:10:40 So this is similar, if you feel there's a need for that

11:10:43 additional information, be happy to go into that as

11:10:45 well.

11:10:45 It is available to you, on the system.

11:10:48 So, let me just share with you first, regarding our

11:10:52 ability within parks and recreation.

11:10:54 We have been green before green was cool.

11:10:56 We like to say that and we are very excited about the

11:10:59 progress that we are making within our facility.

11:11:02 We are very committed to the Florida-friendly concepts.

11:11:06 We work very diligently with that within our parks.

11:11:12 However, we have multiple different facilities and they

11:11:14 have multiple different uses, so we need to make sure

11:11:18 it is the right plant, right place in those locations.

11:11:21 So we work throughout that.

11:11:22 On the beginning phases all the way through our

11:11:25 operations and maintenance.

11:11:26 I want to share with you the list you have today.

11:11:28 This is not a list that's just a city of Tampa list.

11:11:31 This is something being generated for Hillsborough

11:11:32 County, the entire area.

11:11:34 So it's again another place about the right plant,

11:11:37 right place.

11:11:38 For our climate, what works here.

11:11:40 Plants that are Florida-friendly, that work here, may

11:11:43 not work in our northern climate or in our southern

11:11:46 climate.

11:11:46 So this is very geared to just the Hillsborough County

11:11:48 area.

11:11:49 Our natural resource team, and I have been joined by

11:11:52 project planning staff and also natural resources,

11:11:55 Cathy Beck is here, our supervisor and David Flanagan,

11:11:58 one of our landscape architects.

11:12:01 They both are working very closely with Hillsborough

11:12:04 County's Extension Office, with our Southwest Florida

11:12:07 Water Management District.

11:12:09 And what they consider the ice sis, Florida Institute

11:12:14 for Food and Agricultural Services.

11:12:16 So a whole conglomerate working together on this

11:12:19 overall list that would be a guide and recommendation

11:12:21 for organizations like ourselves to use and to share

11:12:23 within the community.

11:12:24 So that's the list that you see there.

11:12:26 This is a dynamic list.

11:12:28 In fact, after we printed it yesterday, Cathy got an

11:12:32 email and said here is some more information, add any

11:12:35 additions or deletions or additional comments.

11:12:38 So it is something that will continue.

11:12:40 It is not a list that says okay, here it is.

11:12:42 And it is in perpetuity forever.

11:12:45 It will be updated on a regular basis.

11:12:48 So you have that latest draft and we will continue to

11:12:51 share that.

11:12:52 Once they have made a final decision on what the

11:12:55 guide's going to be officially within, I think within

11:12:57 the next month or so, probably right after the first of

11:12:59 the year, we will bring that before Council and you can

11:13:02 adopt that as a guide and recommendations for the City

11:13:04 Council, or City of Tampa regarding our

11:13:06 Florida-friendly plant list.

11:13:07 So we will have that four.

11:13:09 But it is a pretty lengthy list and goes through all

11:13:11 the details and lays out the region, the natives, type,

11:13:15 species and comments and then photos will be available.

11:13:18 And this is an item that will eventually be available

11:13:22 on line for folks to pull up and look as they start

11:13:24 their yards or want to get more information on what's

11:13:28 Florida-friendly for the Hillsborough County area.

11:13:30 Any questions regarding the plant list?

11:13:35 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Council Mulhern and Saul-Sena.

11:13:38 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you, Mr. Chair.

11:13:39 Thanks, Karen.

11:13:40 I'm just getting this now, so I haven't had a chance to

11:13:43 look at it.

11:13:44 So I will be looking at it.

11:13:46 Can you -- you speak really fast.

11:13:48 And I caught the ISIS part.

11:13:51 But -- I want to write on the plant list.

11:13:54 Who came up with this Florida-friendly plant list?

11:13:58 >> We are right now working with our Land Development

11:14:00 Corporation.

11:14:01 Our group.

11:14:02 As far as the form based codes and utilizing this list.

11:14:05 But what we have got is, it is the tree and landscape

11:14:08 advisory committee.

11:14:09 It is official name.

11:14:10 It is in my memo I shared with you.

11:14:11 And it has, it is the university of Florida institute

11:14:14 for food and agricultural services.

11:14:17 They call it ISIS.

11:14:19 Again, that group is working with Hillsborough County,

11:14:21 City of Tampa and the Southwest Florida Water

11:14:22 Management District.

11:14:24 That's outlined again in that memo, the second

11:14:27 paragraph.

11:14:28 >>MARY MULHERN: The list, who compiled the list?

11:14:30 You compiled, our Parks Department, or that advisory

11:14:34 committee?

11:14:35 >> That advise vary group through input in the staff,

11:14:38 in our project planning section as well as their staff

11:14:41 and their particular organizations, to come up with an

11:14:44 unified list that everybody could utilize.

11:14:48 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay.

11:14:49 I'm going to look it over.

11:14:50 It's huge and it is great.

11:14:51 But I do want to caution, and this is something that I

11:14:56 learned through all the community gardening meetings

11:15:00 and discussions I have been having with people over the

11:15:03 last year.

11:15:03 But, ISIS is not committed to organic or necessarily

11:15:10 sustainable agriculture.

11:15:12 They're funded a lot by the, by the -- big agra

11:15:18 business, especially by the fertilizer industry.

11:15:21 And I think that we have to be careful, not that we

11:15:25 shouldn't listen to them and get their input.

11:15:28 But that there needs to be some balance to that.

11:15:32 We are getting, and hopefully, I'm sure our Parks

11:15:34 Department, I know, is committed and as you have said,

11:15:38 to that.

11:15:39 But I'm just -- whenever I hear about them, I get a

11:15:43 little bit leery of that.

11:15:45 It even goes as far as the Hillsborough County

11:15:48 extension service, which is really great and really

11:15:50 helpful, but where the organic isn't necessarily the

11:15:55 way that they're going.

11:15:57 Or necessarily sustainable.

11:15:59 So I just want us to be a little cautious about it.

11:16:02 I want to thank you for all this work.

11:16:04 I think it is fantastic and I'm just looking forward to

11:16:08 looking at it and reading it.

11:16:09 And I just had a couple, and also your cover memo, I

11:16:15 haven't had a chance to read this.

11:16:16 But I had a couple questions.

11:16:18 And I do of course understand that you're -- every park

11:16:23 and every piece of greenery you have is different and

11:16:25 has to be treated differently.

11:16:27 But, what brought my questions up were when, I didn't

11:16:34 feel like I got a clear answer from Steve Daignault

11:16:38 when we were asked to approve a contract for some sod.

11:16:43 And I'm not sure -- way need to know for sure is that

11:16:50 our priority with sod is to use not St. Augustine and

11:16:57 not the big water-using ones, and to be moving toward

11:17:02 the Bermuda.

11:17:03 And whatever the other ones are.

11:17:05 Just wondering, are we doing that?

11:17:07 Do we have a commitment to do that?

11:17:09 >> We are within our park specifically, where

11:17:12 appropriate.

11:17:12 Again, Curtis Hixon is a good practice.

11:17:16 Bermuda grass going in there.

11:17:18 Fairly drought tolerant.

11:17:20 Also one that can handle a lot of use and such which

11:17:23 that park will be getting.

11:17:24 Very, very soon.

11:17:25 So we look at that.

11:17:26 Again, as I mentioned, right plant, right place, right

11:17:29 turf, right place.

11:17:30 Depending on what those uses are going to be and what's

11:17:32 entailed in the volume of use, and how we can continue

11:17:36 to be very water conscious in the type of turf and

11:17:40 planting material we are utilizing.

11:17:43 >>MARY MULHERN: That's good to hear.

11:17:44 I guess this is a question maybe for our discussion,

11:17:48 but also for you.

11:17:51 As you said, you were a-- green before green was green.

11:17:54 I like that.

11:17:55 But that, your practice and your principles are for

11:17:59 sustainable design and Florida-friendly landscape.

11:18:03 And my question for us is if we can turn some of this

11:18:08 into policy, because you are, you know, when we hear

11:18:12 from land development and zoning and all the other

11:18:17 departments, and they're doing projects, they're not

11:18:20 necessarily getting the benefit.

11:18:23 I mean, you are not necessarily involved, especially

11:18:28 the early stages of planning for any kind of

11:18:30 development, and a lot of the changes.

11:18:33 So, I'm thinking maybe if we could write some, you

11:18:38 know, policy, because I don't know -- I guess the

11:18:42 form-based coding may be the place to do that.

11:18:48 To write into that, you know, to use the most

11:18:53 drought-tolerant, the most sustainable.

11:18:56 And I'm concerned too because we -- those can be policy

11:19:07 questions and I know, I haven't been involved or

11:19:12 notified of what's been going on.

11:19:14 I only hear like in the tribune, I heard about the fact

11:19:17 that there was a community gardening ordinance being

11:19:22 drafted.

11:19:23 And I had to get in touch with our legal department and

11:19:27 with Thom Snelling to work with them because, a lot of

11:19:31 this is new and I'm doing a lot of research on it.

11:19:34 And I know that Linda for years has been involved in

11:19:37 all these things.

11:19:38 And I want Council to be involved in making, you know,

11:19:45 making these policy changes and hearing about them, and

11:19:49 not just coming to us at a text amendment cycle and we

11:19:53 are going to be asked to, to just go with whatever is

11:19:59 there.

11:20:00 >> Let me see if I can address a couple things early

11:20:02 on.

11:20:03 And that information.

11:20:05 We are involved at the beginning of a lot of the

11:20:08 development processes.

11:20:09 Cathy and her team do the review.

11:20:11 We regrew on grand trees, look over the landscape code

11:20:15 for chapter 13 as well.

11:20:17 And we do have a seat at the table when they're going

11:20:20 through the review processes, when they're going

11:20:22 through, like with the land development, form based

11:20:25 code.

11:20:25 Cathy and her team are at the table as well as some of

11:20:29 our other staff, depending on where they are and what's

11:20:35 available.

11:20:35 We have a dynamic supervisor who knows her stuff and

11:20:38 then some out there, and is really the go-to person

11:20:42 with most of the land development information that

11:20:43 they're seeking from our side of things.

11:20:45 >> Well, I think one of the reasons I brought up

11:20:51 plants, was because we -- in all of our zoning

11:20:54 meetings, we hear about trees and grand trees and

11:20:56 that's it.

11:20:57 We are basically talking about oak trees.

11:21:03 And I never, unless we bring it up, and ask for, you

11:21:07 know, more impervious surface or more green or

11:21:10 whatever, I don't hear a lot of -- I don't think we

11:21:16 have got a lot of requirements in our policy that would

11:21:19 encourage people to go toward, you know, I mean, land

11:21:24 development and landscape and parks can sit there and

11:21:28 tell some developer that they should be putting in

11:21:30 green, but if we don't have it written into our code,

11:21:33 it doesn't have to happen.

11:21:35 And I don't see it happening.

11:21:37 So, I guess -- these are just some things that I'm

11:21:41 thinking about, I'd like to see us pursue.

11:21:44 I would love to work with you on any of this.

11:21:47 And I hope we can go forward with doing that, because I

11:21:53 think, you know, you can have principles and practices,

11:21:55 but there's no teeth if it's not part of the policy.

11:22:00 And then the other question I had -- this related to

11:22:08 the one you already answered about who this committee

11:22:10 is who came up with the list.

11:22:12 But, the natural resource staff members, you're talking

11:22:18 about your staff members.

11:22:20 >> Yes.

11:22:21 >>MARY MULHERN: Well, thanks a lot.

11:22:22 I really appreciate this.

11:22:24 A lot of information.

11:22:26 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Councilmen Saul-Sena?

11:22:28 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you so much for coming to us

11:22:30 with this list today.

11:22:32 Yesterday I attended a three-hour meeting about

11:22:34 fertilizer.

11:22:35 And I was very pleased that at the end of it the county

11:22:38 commission gave direction to their EPC staff to not use

11:22:42 nitrogen laden fertilizer in the summer because of its

11:22:45 negative impact on waterways, causing red tide and

11:22:48 algae blooms.

11:22:49 And I just wondered if, as leaders in the community, if

11:22:54 we will, if we are already or, now that we know this,

11:22:58 in the future we will suspend using nitrogen ladened

11:23:03 fertilizers in the summer months and use time released

11:23:06 ones in the spring and or fall or not fertilize in the

11:23:11 summer.

11:23:12 Do you know our policy?

11:23:13 >> We have our fertilizer schedules.

11:23:15 I can go back through and tell you exactly what

11:23:18 products we are using.

11:23:19 I know when we had the discussions about gar few and

11:23:22 all that we weren't using any of that product.

11:23:25 When the president asked us, that's why our fields are

11:23:28 more weedy because of some it others.

11:23:30 We tolerate more weeds for that person.

11:23:33 I can go over exactly what we are using and give you

11:23:35 that information.

11:23:36 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: That would be great, because I feel

11:23:38 like as the city, we can be leaders.

11:23:41 And I don't believe we do now mandate that anybody use

11:23:45 Florida-friendly materials.

11:23:46 The good thing is because of the recognition ever

11:23:48 watering restraints and con strains, they're developing

11:23:51 more plants that are drought-tolerant.

11:23:53 So it is becoming easier to choose really attractive

11:23:56 plants that are Florida-friendly.

11:23:57 But, I'm, I see our zoning folks here, which is great.

11:24:03 Has the administration or Council ever considered a

11:24:06 policy encouraging, particularly commercial folks, to

11:24:10 use Florida-friendly plant material?

11:24:15 >> I'm not sure on my end, Cathy, do you remember

11:24:20 anything?

11:24:20 I know we have recommended.

11:24:22 But no teeth.

11:24:24 >> This may be a Cathy Coyle.

11:24:33 >>CATHERINE COYLE: To date, they're correct.

11:24:34 This has been a recommendation through our plans

11:24:36 review.

11:24:36 We are looking as we go into unified land development

11:24:39 code and looking through form based code, specifically

11:24:42 in Seminole heights at potentially requiring

11:24:45 drought-tolerant plants and Florida-friendly.

11:24:47 Something we are working on right now.

11:24:48 As Karen mentioned, this list has also been reviewed by

11:24:51 Land Development Coordination and we have been

11:24:53 assisting in that effort as well to try to get the best

11:24:56 possible lift, most updated information for the new

11:24:59 code and new process.

11:25:01 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Great.

11:25:01 Thank you.

11:25:02 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Councilman Caetano.

11:25:06 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: I pass.

11:25:08 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Any other question?

11:25:09 Anything else?

11:25:10 Okay, we will take public comment then.

11:25:12 Anyone from the public wish to address Council on this

11:25:14 workshop?

11:25:20 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: One last question.

11:25:21 I understand that we had a new rec center proposal that

11:25:24 went out and the specs initially didn't include any,

11:25:28 any requirements that it be, not LEED certified

11:25:31 specifically, but sustainable, you know, use recycled

11:25:37 materials.

11:25:37 The kind of things you would do if building a LEED

11:25:40 building, although we are not requiring certification.

11:25:42 Then somebody sort of complained about it, and then

11:25:44 they added that.

11:25:46 So I just wondered, as a sort of policy rule, when you

11:25:51 go out with request for proposals for new facilities,

11:25:54 do you say that they need to be sustainable?

11:25:56 >> We have been working towards that, with David bond's

11:25:59 office.

11:25:59 Again, not in the certified capacity, but looking at

11:26:03 satisfied capacity and trying to meet those levels as

11:26:05 well in regards to that.

11:26:06 So that is something that is continuing in our die lag.

11:26:10 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: But it is not necessarily in specs

11:26:12 right now that are going out for proposals?

11:26:15 >> Some of that information is.

11:26:16 Not all of it is.

11:26:18 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Will David be a better person to

11:26:20 ask?

11:26:21 >> Yes.

11:26:21 Because he has all the particulars on how that works

11:26:23 within his guidelines and such for construction

11:26:26 administration.

11:26:27 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank, because it is something

11:26:29 Council has been, very, promoting.

11:26:31 And we were told that the administration's doing this.

11:26:34 >> We are.

11:26:35 We are striving for that.

11:26:36 I know we worked open that real hard with our new Tampa

11:26:39 facility, that go beyond what we had said initially, to

11:26:42 get to that silver level we have been shooting for.

11:26:46 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you.

11:26:47 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Council many Caetano, then Mulhern.

11:26:51 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: As far as the machinery goes, is

11:26:53 this strictly for use by the city?

11:26:55 Or are you talking about everybody that's out there

11:26:58 cutting grass or blowing leaves?

11:27:02 >> When I spoke to you in the sustainability report,

11:27:04 specifically with the city within parks and recreation

11:27:06 is doing.

11:27:06 And our particular operations.

11:27:08 So any equipment that we purchase in such, we work

11:27:11 towards that green technology.

11:27:12 And we have been very successful in doing so.

11:27:14 We have also done through our optimization process,

11:27:18 able to reduce our equipment level by 35%.

11:27:49 >> I thought we were done, but no, I keep thinking of

11:28:50 more questions.

11:28:50 I'm wondering, are you working at all on the tree list?

11:28:56 I mean, the tree ordinance and making any changes to

11:29:01 that?

11:29:03 >> We had done some changes a while back.

11:29:05 It's been a couple years now.

11:29:06 And we continue to look at the tree and updates.

11:29:10 Cathy, have we done anything recently?

11:29:15 Still in the form based.

11:29:17 >>MARY MULHERN: I really, especially after that

11:29:19 wonderful study that the UF and USF did on the tree

11:29:23 canopy and we found out how, you know, the invasive

11:29:27 trees and -- I'm wondering, it seems like we should

11:29:33 have a goal of you know, number one, just increasing

11:29:37 the number of trees that we have.

11:29:39 For carbon sequestration.

11:29:42 And I know, you know, we are probably, I don't know,

11:29:46 Cathy Coyle might know this when she speaks later.

11:29:51 Where we are with our baseline on our carbon output,

11:29:54 which we have to do to be able to figure out what our

11:29:56 goals are to reduce that.

11:29:58 But we know if we plant more trees, I'm just wondering

11:30:03 if that is something that we are going to be hearing

11:30:06 about.

11:30:06 Let me ask all my tree questions at once.

11:30:09 Whoever wants to answer them can.

11:30:10 I have also heard from a lot of people about -- we

11:30:18 really need some updating on which trees are protected

11:30:22 and which aren't.

11:30:23 And which are considered invasive.

11:30:26 And I remember when we -- when we had the report from

11:30:30 the universities, and Terry from -- suddenly blanking

11:30:37 out.

11:30:37 But he said, you know, really if we could do some kind

11:30:41 of education program about the Brazilian peppers and

11:30:46 have people pull that and plant something.

11:30:47 And if we could somehow support that, I don't know if,

11:30:51 you know, I know we don't have any money, but if there

11:30:54 could be some kind of education, some kind of creative

11:30:56 way to get people to do that.

11:30:58 I think that that would be awesome.

11:31:02 And you know, I just think there's so much that we

11:31:06 could be doing to reduce our carbon output, just

11:31:10 through planting.

11:31:12 And I just, you know, want to know where we are going

11:31:14 with that, if we are going anywhere.

11:31:16 If there are plans.

11:31:17 And what follow-up there is to that fantastic study

11:31:21 they did for us.

11:31:22 >> Well, the good news is, there's been tremendous

11:31:25 followup.

11:31:26 We have from the analysis, we did create a committee, a

11:31:30 working group within the community that had business

11:31:32 members as well as neighborhood leaders and folks in

11:31:37 the industry to talk about what are the next steps?

11:31:39 What really do we need to do within the community to

11:31:42 one, that piece of education really get folks out and

11:31:45 understanding, what they need to be doing, what they

11:31:47 need to look for.

11:31:48 Again, the -- pull a pepper, plant an oak.

11:31:53 So that's actually one of our strategies on there,

11:31:55 things we'd like to see move forward.

11:31:57 We are looking at more educational opportunity and

11:31:59 trying to focus on based on the analysis, focus on

11:32:03 neighborhoods where we really need to improve the tree

11:32:05 population in those areas.

11:32:07 And I think councilmember Miranda had brought it up

11:32:10 about his particular neighborhoods and those areas that

11:32:13 aren't as treed and canopied as we'd like to see.

11:32:17 Again, right tree, right place.

11:32:19 I say that, right tree, right place within the

11:32:23 neighborhood and the community.

11:32:24 But making that focus and taking a particular

11:32:26 neighborhood or area that may not have had the canopy

11:32:30 and some of our other portions of our community,

11:32:33 educating them so we can work with them to use our

11:32:35 community tree program and plant those trees and get

11:32:38 them caring for them and finding out how important

11:32:42 those trees are to them and their community.

11:32:44 >> I'd love to see us actually have something come out

11:32:47 about the peppers.

11:32:51 >> Well, it is one of our strategies that came out of

11:32:53 that working group.

11:32:54 So we are taking that information now and trying to put

11:32:56 that into process and practice within our operation

11:33:00 along with that educational component.

11:33:03 >> Great.

11:33:04 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Thank you.

11:33:04 Move now to item 3.

11:33:06 Our second workshop for this morning.

11:33:09 This is on the July 2009 text amendment cycle.

11:33:24 >> Good morning, Catherine Coyle, land development.

11:33:31 Passing out additional copies in case you didn't have

11:33:33 yours with you for some reason.

11:33:44 >> If I could, the petitioner for the privately

11:33:47 initiated amendment on page 24, for alcoholic

11:33:51 beverages, it says David Mechanik and Pollack is also

11:33:54 with that firm and is representing that particular

11:33:57 applicant.

11:33:59 They have identified to me that they would be looking

11:34:02 to potentially continue that request.

11:34:06 I'll let her speak to that just to clear that out of

11:34:08 the way before we get started.

11:34:17 >> Good morning.

11:34:19 Ann Pollack, 305 South Boulevard.

11:34:24 We have a request in here that we are looking to

11:34:28 continue.

11:34:29 We are trying to get some final approval from our

11:34:31 client as to how to move forward with this.

11:34:33 There's been a lot of opposition to what we have

11:34:37 requested, and part of our plan was to work with the

11:34:40 city as they move forward and modify their special use

11:34:44 procedures, so that what we are looking to do can

11:34:48 somehow maybe be melded in with what the city does.

11:34:52 And the city's process has unfortunately taken much

11:34:55 longer than we had expected.

11:34:57 And so, as a result, we are still kind of in the same

11:35:00 position we were at the last cycle.

11:35:04 So, we were hoping if it's possible, maybe to move

11:35:08 this, get this continued to the January workshop, just

11:35:12 so it is not pushed out too far and by that time, we

11:35:16 will have, I will know exactly what the plan is to do

11:35:22 with this.

11:35:23 Unfortunately, we just don't have that decision today.

11:35:26 I had discussed this with Julia Cole and Cathy Coyle

11:35:33 and they suggested maybe the better ideal is continue

11:35:37 to the January cycle.

11:35:39 But we would just like to keep this active and that's,

11:35:46 we would request the continuance as quickly as

11:35:48 possible, but you know, if you would agree to that.

11:35:58 >> Excuse me, which one are we discussing?

11:36:01 >> The one listed page 24.

11:36:12 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Karen, thank you.

11:36:14 Just procedurally, where is Cathy or Julia?

11:36:19 We called it the July 2009 text amendment cycle.

11:36:24 >> Correct.

11:36:25 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Is this the first time that Council

11:36:26 has discussed this cycle?

11:36:29 This particular cycle?

11:36:31 >>CATHERINE COYLE: That's correct.

11:36:32 I tried for an earlier workshop and this was the

11:36:35 workshop that we got.

11:36:36 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: And then as this cycle progresses,

11:36:39 what's the schedule?

11:36:42 >> I have spoken with the Planning Commission and

11:36:44 unfortunately, due to the timing of this workshop, it

11:36:47 has to go forward in the February hearing for the

11:36:50 Planning Commission.

11:36:51 Then we are anticipating coming back that second night,

11:36:55 second Thursday evening in February, for first reading.

11:36:58 And the second reading at the end of February.

11:37:01 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Okay.

11:37:02 And so, Ann's suggestion about sort of letting this

11:37:08 linger until January, if there's discussions going on,

11:37:14 what staff's response to that?

11:37:16 >> If you were to continue it to the January workshop

11:37:18 to discuss, it will still go within the January cycle.

11:37:22 Because we'd already be moving forward to the Planning

11:37:24 Commission.

11:37:26 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: The goal is leave this meeting today

11:37:28 and transmit.

11:37:29 >> Transmit whatever changes or that Council feels fit.

11:37:34 Or none if you don't want any.

11:37:36 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: In other words, if we were going to

11:37:37 keep it in the batch, we would need to transmit it,

11:37:40 even though there seems to be some dispute about it?

11:37:45 >> Correct.

11:37:46 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Probably have a hard time

11:37:48 transmitting it if we haven't -- I mean, at least

11:37:52 discussed the issues.

11:37:53 So I think, my put us in a hard place.

11:37:56 I don't know.

11:37:57 All right.

11:37:58 Let's see how that chugs along.

11:38:06 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Any other questions from Council?

11:38:11 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Are we going to go through these?

11:38:14 >>GWEN MILLER: Going to continue this one.

11:38:16 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Well, they're requesting the

11:38:17 continuance on this one to January, that's what the

11:38:20 request is.

11:38:22 >> And if it doesn't work into the January workshop,

11:38:25 but I think that essentially would put it in the next

11:38:27 cycle anyway.

11:38:28 It would just move it up to have a quicker discussion.

11:38:31 Which we'd like to do if we get to that, have the full

11:38:34 discussion with the public and you.

11:38:36 And we do want to have it as soon as possible.

11:38:40 We just would like it continued from today.

11:38:42 >> All right.

11:38:43 I'll go ahead and make that motion to pull it out of

11:38:46 this cycle.

11:38:51 Are you speaking to this issue?

11:38:52 >> I just want to speak to this issue.

11:38:56 >>THOMAS SCOTT: That's not the process.

11:38:57 This is a workshop, my understanding we can't take any

11:39:00 action until we hear from the public.

11:39:01 My intent was to move through this, with all these, get

11:39:05 everything on the record and then allow the public to

11:39:08 speak to what I want to speak to.

11:39:09 >> I just want to point out, might be a little -- in

11:39:12 the past when you guys have addressed this, we have

11:39:16 broke out even issue.

11:39:19 I did want to point out.

11:39:21 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Then what is our rules?

11:39:22 We need to go back to that.

11:39:24 I was trying to follow the rules we set for workshops.

11:39:30 >> In terms of the continuance, you would probably want

11:39:33 the public to hear.

11:39:35 This workshop is set as one item.

11:39:41 It's Council's discretion whether you want to take it

11:39:44 item by item by item and allow public or do it in its

11:39:48 totality.

11:39:48 It is Council's discretion.

11:39:51 It is listed as a 11:15 workshop to discuss the text

11:39:56 amendment cycle.

11:40:00 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: For the ease ever clarity for all of

11:40:02 us, I'd like to take it item by item.

11:40:06 >>MARY MULHERN: I'll second that.

11:40:08 >>THOMAS SCOTT: All in favor signify by saying aye.

11:40:12 >> Council, with regards to miss Pollock's issue, in

11:40:16 terms of January, you are having a 10:30 workshop to

11:40:19 discuss alcoholic license beverage license rules.

11:40:23 Perhaps it would be appropriate to join that item,

11:40:27 because it is somewhat related.

11:40:29 So when the time comes to do that, 10:30 on the 28th,

11:40:33 might be an appropriate time.

11:40:36 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Want to speak to that?

11:40:38 >> Spencer Kass, representing the Virginia park

11:40:40 neighborhood association.

11:40:41 I feel comfortable speaking on this.

11:40:43 As a petitioner said, everybody does object to this.

11:40:46 However, if it's marked final for January, this will be

11:40:49 the last time the petitioner agrees to continue,

11:40:51 because it's already been continued once before.

11:40:53 We have no objections to that.

11:40:55 So, we would just ask the Council mark this -- it will

11:40:58 be the final time.

11:40:59 I ran it by the petitioner.

11:41:00 I don't think they'd have an objection to that.

11:41:03 Thank you.

11:41:08 >> That would be fine.

11:41:09 We expect to know one way or the other how we, if we

11:41:12 want to, you know, move forward or however by that.

11:41:17 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Anyone else from the public want to

11:41:20 speak to this item?

11:41:20 So we can take action now.

11:41:22 Been moved and second that we move it to the.

11:41:27 >>MARY MULHERN: January 28th.

11:41:27 >> I think Saul-Sena moved.

11:41:30 Motion and second?

11:41:34 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Clarify, the motion would be to

11:41:35 actually continue it for discussion purposes to the

11:41:39 January workshop, but actually pull this item out of

11:41:43 this cycle and move it into the next cycle.

11:41:46 This is David Mechanik alcoholic beverages, page 24

11:41:54 item.

11:41:55 >> Privately initiated text amendment on alcoholic

11:41:58 beverages.

11:41:58 Thank you.

11:41:59 >> Second.

11:42:01 >>THOMAS SCOTT: In bold print on this doubt.

11:42:03 Dated December 7th.

11:42:05 Been moved and second.

11:42:06 All in favor signify by saying aye.

11:42:09 Okay.

11:42:09 [ Motion carried ]

11:42:12 >> Thank you, Council.

11:42:14 Going back to the overall document, pages 2 through

11:42:20 eight, they were amendments that had motions by City

11:42:23 Council.

11:42:23 I included each motion at the top of each section.

11:42:28 As it pertained to that motion.

11:42:30 The first one is the ground level activation and the

11:42:32 CDB and the Channel District.

11:42:34 Council's motion was to include provision to activate

11:42:40 the ground level in ground level and CDBG, 27, 441 on

11:42:53 page two.

11:42:53 This is where the design standards for Franklin Street

11:42:57 district exist.

11:42:58 This is the only district in downtown where there are

11:43:01 requirements for ground floor uses.

11:43:03 Other than generic use that's in the building or open

11:43:09 space.

11:43:09 These are very specific.

11:43:13 What we did is we modified that it is not just Franklin

11:43:16 Street.

11:43:16 It also includes all other streets.

11:43:19 So that takes care of the all other street provision.

11:43:22 We included an purpose and intent section, that it is

11:43:25 the further intent of the CDBG that this, all of the

11:43:30 streets be activated with pedestrian oriented and

11:43:33 ground level uses, such as residential, art displays.

11:43:37 Then we took number two and three, which were related

11:43:41 specifically to the Franklin Street district and then

11:43:43 the retail district, which is within that overall

11:43:46 district.

11:43:47 Clarified that language.

11:43:50 Cleaned that up.

11:43:50 And then inserted number four, on page four, which was

11:43:55 related to all other streets.

11:43:57 Now, if you look just to give you the comparison, on

11:44:02 page two, it is specifically, specifically within the

11:44:09 Franklin street district on page two and three.

11:44:11 It is a retail restaurant use, or personal services

11:44:16 that has allowed on that ground floor within the

11:44:19 Franklin Street retail district.

11:44:20 That is the overall plan for downtown, that that

11:44:25 particular corridor is the retail corridor.

11:44:28 As you can see with restaurants and retail on that

11:44:31 street.

11:44:31 We have broadened it slightly through the rest of the

11:44:33 streets, basically because the motion was simply

11:44:37 activation for all streets.

11:44:38 We included restaurants -- I'm sorry, residential, art

11:44:43 displays, commercial or office uses.

11:44:45 So any one of those types of uses could then bring

11:44:49 color and vibrancy to the ground floor.

11:44:53 We included also the same language that was in the

11:44:57 retail district, that awnings and canopies shall be

11:45:02 included over the length of those particular uses.

11:45:04 And then any features, such as mechanical storage or

11:45:08 other building --

11:45:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Cathy, any objections from the

11:45:13 community on what you have done?

11:45:17 >> I believe Karen is here to clarify the changes.

11:45:21 We will have to discuss that.

11:45:24 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: We have limited time.

11:45:26 >> That language is to follow the design guidelines and

11:45:28 provide sufficient ventilation.

11:45:31 Channel District language just really quickly is at the

11:45:34 bottom of page four.

11:45:35 That is 27.457.

11:45:38 We already had language in there that when providing

11:45:40 for neighborhood serving commercial uses, that it needs

11:45:43 to be at the ground floor and second and third floor

11:45:47 could extend for a specific user.

11:45:49 We changed to say all developments.

11:45:51 We included residential, office and neighborhoods

11:45:53 serving commercial uses, because we have instances

11:45:55 where there are strictly residential buildings, and

11:46:00 could be in some walk-up buildings.

11:46:05 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: How about parking garages?

11:46:08 >> Not on Franklin.

11:46:10 >> They're not allowed on Franklin.

11:46:12 Mean in the Channel District?

11:46:14 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Yes, the Channel District.

11:46:15 >> The Channel District, all the ground floors of all

11:46:19 buildings in the Channel District have to be one of

11:46:22 these uses.

11:46:23 There's also other building design standards.

11:46:25 Right now, I'm supposing what your question really

11:46:29 is...

11:46:31 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: If somebody builds a freestanding

11:46:32 parking garage.

11:46:33 >> The ground floor would need to have some other use

11:46:36 incorporated on the ground floor as well.

11:46:38 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: That's a new requirement?

11:46:40 >> Correct.

11:46:40 Where there are entrances into that parking garage, or

11:46:44 ventilation or storage areas, have to be minimized by

11:46:46 the other building design standards we have.

11:46:49 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Councilwoman Saul-Sena?

11:46:51 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I'm so happy to see this.

11:46:52 I wish we had had this years and years ago.

11:46:56 I just wanted to ask, our new urban design person

11:46:59 Michael la han take a look on this?

11:47:01 >> Yes, he was on the list for review.

11:47:04 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Good.

11:47:05 Well, in the first -- I guess this is the first

11:47:08 meeting.

11:47:08 I just want to make sure that our downtown property

11:47:11 owners are plugged into this.

11:47:13 This is great.

11:47:14 I can think of a half dozen buildings that would be so

11:47:16 much better if these rules had been -- make that two

11:47:20 dozen.

11:47:21 Okay?

11:47:21 Will these rules apply -- if somebody had gotten a

11:47:26 rezoning four years ago with -- with a plan that's less

11:47:31 inspired than this.

11:47:32 And they haven't gone for permitting yet and they come

11:47:35 up next year for permitting, will they have to abide by

11:47:38 these new rules?

11:47:40 >> Four years ago?

11:47:41 >> Yes.

11:47:41 No.

11:47:46 >> We have a time limit of five years.

11:47:48 And then potentially a two year extension based on

11:47:51 senate bill 360.

11:47:53 So you're looking at potentially up to 7.

11:47:56 >> Can we do anything about that?

11:47:58 >> No.

11:47:59 >> When you grant that rezoning, you're granting them

11:48:02 exactly what's on that plan.

11:48:04 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Where's the five years come from?

11:48:07 >> It is in the code.

11:48:08 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Then we could change it.

11:48:10 >> You could potentially, but I don't know legally if

11:48:12 you want to.

11:48:13 >> The question, we have in our code right now for

11:48:15 planned development approval, that there's in essence

11:48:17 like a five year vesting on the planned unit

11:48:21 developments.

11:48:22 Then after that, there's some question as to what you

11:48:24 in fact have received through that PD process and what

11:48:27 is still up for re-review.

11:48:30 If that's something you would like us to analyze and

11:48:32 make --

11:48:34 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Can we put that in here?

11:48:36 >> No.

11:48:36 That would be requiring some time and thought as to how

11:48:40 you handle that issue.

11:48:41 And it is not appropriate in this cycle.

11:48:44 It hasn't been brought for.

11:48:46 It would have been --

11:48:47 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: But we could direct you now to put

11:48:49 it into the next one?

11:48:50 >> You could direct us to put it in that cycle.

11:48:53 I will tell you though, that's going to take a little

11:48:57 at a time, because you have to be careful what you're

11:48:59 saying on planned developments.

11:49:01 You have heard me say this before.

11:49:02 The positive thing about a planned development, you

11:49:05 know what you're getting at the beginning.

11:49:06 But, you have made some decisions and you're giving a

11:49:09 property rights to somebody through the planned

11:49:11 development process that you have to be very careful

11:49:13 and cognizant as to how you can change that.

11:49:16 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: What if it wasn't a planned

11:49:17 development.

11:49:17 What it was a CDBG one or two.

11:49:20 >> That is true site planning zoning district, it is

11:49:23 the same type of zoning approval.

11:49:25 >> She's asking a different question.

11:49:28 >> If you have an undeveloped prompt or wanting to tear

11:49:30 the building down and never come to City Council for

11:49:32 approval and just want to go to permitting to build,

11:49:35 you have to comply with whatever rule is on the books

11:49:38 at that time.

11:49:39 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thanks.

11:49:40 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Anyone from the public want to address

11:49:42 Council on this one?

11:49:47 >> Good morning.

11:49:48 Karen crest, downtown partnership.

11:49:50 We have worked with Cathy on these changes.

11:49:53 Our public round committee has reviewed them.

11:49:56 Just have one minor suggestion.

11:49:59 When they're talking about the intent really is to

11:50:02 provide shade and weather protection.

11:50:03 We think maybe canopies, limiting that to canopies and

11:50:09 awnings might be too prescriptive.

11:50:11 There's other ways to accomplish that.

11:50:13 So we would suggest maybe the language just be changed

11:50:15 to say --

11:50:18 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Where are you at?

11:50:19 4 D?

11:50:22 >> Yes.

11:50:23 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Can we make a motioning that asking

11:50:25 it be expanded to say or other means to provide shade?

11:50:28 So moved.

11:50:31 >> Second.

11:50:33 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Moved and second.

11:50:34 All in favor signify by saying aye.

11:50:36 Opposes?

11:50:39 [ MOTION CARRIED ]

11:50:40 >> Thank you.

11:50:41 Page five, Council made a motion back in June that this

11:50:45 character of single-family detached home is maintained

11:50:48 by limiting the number of cars being exposed in a

11:50:51 garage to two questions are.

11:50:53 We already have several sections in the code related to

11:50:55 semi detached, attached and multi-family design.

11:50:59 Within that particular area of the code, we included

11:51:01 single-family detached design standards to address is

11:51:04 the motion.

11:51:05 We noted the purpose is the design, for infill, the

11:51:10 development should be consistent with the general site

11:51:12 plan requirements, the underlying zoning district,

11:51:15 applicability all single-family detached dwellings.

11:51:18 New development of them.

11:51:19 Design requirements, there should be no more than a two

11:51:21 car garage door facing or oriented directly toward the

11:51:24 street right-of-way.

11:51:26 Any other garage door shall face to the interior or

11:51:29 rear of the zoning lot.

11:51:31 And then the enforcement obviously is through the site

11:51:34 plan review at times permitting.

11:51:35 The motion was fairly, fairly broad and I went back and

11:51:40 read through the transcript and what I got from the

11:51:43 intent of the discussion was, it was the two car garage

11:51:46 door facing the front.

11:51:47 You didn't necessarily want ten of them facing the

11:51:49 front.

11:51:50 Not limiting necessarily the number of cars or garages

11:51:53 on the property, especially if someone had a large

11:51:56 property.

11:51:56 But limiting the view of that.

11:51:58 If I was incorrect, please direct me.

11:52:02 But I believe there are people here to speak about this

11:52:04 particular item as well.

11:52:07 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Councilman Dingfelder?

11:52:10 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I vaguely remember the discussion I

11:52:11 guess from last summer, and I think I remember the

11:52:13 house that brought the discussion up.

11:52:16 At least I'm in the right ballpark, so to speak.

11:52:20 But anyway, as I read it now though, I'm thinking, I

11:52:26 can picture a lot of sort of larger properties or

11:52:29 larger houses, single-family houses, that might have

11:52:34 like three garage doors.

11:52:37 Now, let me clarify.

11:52:38 I don't have a garage.

11:52:39 I don't have a garage door.

11:52:41 So I don't have a dog in this fight, just wanted to

11:52:44 clarify.

11:52:45 But I'm just thinking that maybe two might be a little.

11:52:50 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: We can say three.

11:52:52 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: That's what I'm thinking.

11:52:53 Some people may have a need for three.

11:52:55 Five seems like a bit extreme.

11:52:57 If you need five, maybe you need a variance or a PD or

11:53:01 something like that.

11:53:01 But three might seem to be more in line with larger

11:53:06 houses.

11:53:06 >> We did hold a public information workshop at the end

11:53:08 of October, where we bring this out to everyone.

11:53:11 We hold it in here.

11:53:12 And that was some of the comments from some of the

11:53:14 single-family builders, especially up in new Tampa,

11:53:17 there's a lot of homes with three car garages and a lot

11:53:20 of the newer homes that are larger sometimes have three

11:53:22 as well.

11:53:23 So, it was their comment as well.

11:53:26 They have additional comments probably.

11:53:28 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Okay.

11:53:29 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Councilwoman Mulhern?

11:53:31 >>MARY MULHERN: I was just going to say I have never

11:53:33 seen a three car garage facing -- I have seen three car

11:53:37 garages, but that are facing the street I can't picture

11:53:40 any.

11:53:40 But this they must all be in Joseph's district.

11:53:46 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: Some of them have three cars, only

11:53:49 have two doors.

11:53:50 Yet, we have garages that are not facing the street, in

11:53:53 other words, they go inside, they're facing each other

11:53:56 in the driveway.

11:53:57 >> The others aren't limited by this.

11:53:59 It is the ones facing the street.

11:54:03 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Anyone from the public wish to address

11:54:05 Council?

11:54:06 Anyone from the public?

11:54:08 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Want to keep it short and sweet.

11:54:09 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Anyone from the public?

11:54:13 >> It's an unreasonable restriction and there's no

11:54:15 basis.

11:54:16 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Please state your name.

11:54:17 >> Steve Michelini.

11:54:18 I don't have a client on this issue.

11:54:20 It is simply a matter of bad policy.

11:54:22 There's no basis for restricting garage doors.

11:54:25 You have to have a basis.

11:54:26 It can't be just because you don't like it.

11:54:28 If somebody has extra square footage, they have larger

11:54:32 lots, and this is a policy that apparently is being

11:54:34 drafted based on one small area of town.

11:54:36 It has nothing to do with the remainder of the city.

11:54:39 They're extremely large lots, as you already pointed

11:54:43 out, that have the ability to have garage doors that

11:54:45 face any one of a number of directions.

11:54:47 There are a few three car garages in that are

11:54:53 beautiful.

11:54:54 There are not many.

11:54:55 Attractively done.

11:54:55 And what you're doing, you're restricting, say you can

11:55:01 only have two garage doors.

11:55:02 Now you have changed the garage door and made those two

11:55:06 very wide doors to accommodate more than two vehicles.

11:55:08 So now you have affected how you have designed the

11:55:11 structure itself.

11:55:11 I understand where you're coming from.

11:55:15 I understand you don't want things to be massive and

11:55:17 have big garages on properties.

11:55:19 But there's no basis for that.

11:55:20 If you have the property and it's compatible and design

11:55:24 works well, you should be allowed to do it.

11:55:26 Respectfully request you treat this request from the,

11:55:29 going to the Planning Commission.

11:55:32 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Next?

11:55:33 Next speaker?

11:55:37 >> Good morning, City Council.

11:55:39 Gary Brown, President, Sterling Bay Homes.

11:55:41 I am here actually representing the Tampa Bay Builders

11:55:44 Association.

11:55:44 And we too don't believe that any design guidelines

11:55:49 should be imposed upon single-family detached homes in

11:55:52 the City of Tampa.

11:55:53 You have always avoided it.

11:55:55 Things work well, I understand there may have been one

11:55:58 potential home that started this conversation.

11:56:01 But, it seems like it's just really not necessary.

11:56:06 Thank you.

11:56:11 >> Representing the Virginia Park Neighborhood

11:56:13 Association.

11:56:14 I'll speak for T.H.A.N also.

11:56:16 Everybody else is away on vacation.

11:56:18 From the meeting, we don't want more cars on the

11:56:24 streets.

11:56:24 We have a lot of complaints cars on the streets.

11:56:26 Far more than garage doors.

11:56:29 Getting the cars off the streets is what everybody

11:56:30 wants.

11:56:34 I mean, people get into fights with people parking on

11:56:38 the street.

11:56:38 Really fights.

11:56:39 So, we'd respectfully ask that this be pulled.

11:56:42 Thank you.

11:56:46 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Council?

11:56:47 Anyone else?

11:56:50 Councilman Caetano?

11:56:56 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: What's going to happen in a gated

11:56:57 community?

11:56:58 Can we still control that?

11:57:05 >> In a gated community?

11:57:08 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: I'll tell you why.

11:57:09 In Grand Hampton, every family has five cars.

11:57:12 The garage is full of junk, the cars are out in the

11:57:14 driveway.

11:57:15 You can't walk on the sidewalk.

11:57:16 Because cars are across the sidewalk.

11:57:19 Of course, it is gated.

11:57:21 And there's nobody to police it.

11:57:23 The police don't, don't patrol there.

11:57:26 There is a police man there, but he's paid by the

11:57:31 homeowners association.

11:57:32 >> That's not actually uncommon in other places that

11:57:34 aren't gated, quite frankly.

11:57:36 We have had that issue everywhere in the city.

11:57:38 That the garage is usually full of stuff and peoples,

11:57:42 cars, that's what Spencer was alluding to.

11:57:45 Has nothing to do with whether it is gated or not

11:57:47 gated.

11:57:48 It is just design standard for any new single-family

11:57:50 home being built.

11:57:52 >>JOSEPH P. CAETANO: I don't think we should be telling

11:57:54 people how to build their homes, as the gentleman said

11:57:57 from the builders association, maybe 25 years from now

11:58:01 when we have light rail going somewhere, I don't know

11:58:04 where it is going to go, maybe at that point, we can do

11:58:08 it.

11:58:08 But I don't think we should tell builders what to do

11:58:11 with their property.

11:58:12 >> This particular language was directed by Council, so

11:58:15 if you want to pull it, that's completely within your

11:58:17 purview.

11:58:19 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Councilwoman Saul-Sena?

11:58:21 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I think what we are suffering from

11:58:23 is a case of affluence.

11:58:26 Houses that have five vehicles are definitely suffering

11:58:28 from affluen-za.

11:58:31 But, anyway, this is an attempt to not limit the number

11:58:36 of parking, or under the house driveways, but to have

11:58:43 the garage doors not face the street because when

11:58:47 they're open, they're unattractive and it was really an

11:58:50 aesthetic move.

11:58:51 I would be happy to modify it to three.

11:58:53 I certainly think that three facing the street, plus

11:58:56 however many you want facing inwardly or the side

11:58:59 street or back alley.

11:59:01 That should suffice.

11:59:02 So, I'll give it a whirl.

11:59:03 I move that we modify this to allow three garages doors

11:59:09 facing the street.

11:59:10 And not -- and the other verbiage abandon.

11:59:16 >>GWEN MILLER: I make a motion we distract and pull it

11:59:19 from the text amendment.

11:59:20 >> Second.

11:59:27 >> No second to the first motion.

11:59:29 >> I was thinking about seconding, but the other motion

11:59:31 snuck in before I had a chance to consider seconding.

11:59:34 Let me just speak to, ask Cathy one more question.

11:59:41 Cathy, do we see -- I know you're not in permitting per

11:59:48 se.

11:59:48 But do we see many, you know, four-car garages facing

11:59:55 the street, being built?

11:59:58 >> As you said, I'm not in permitting.

12:00:03 But I can say, logistically on the size of lots we

12:00:06 have, even if they're 75 feet wide, it can be difficult

12:00:09 to put four up front.

12:00:11 Usually they might face interior and create an auto

12:00:14 court of some sort.

12:00:15 I am not an expert on construction.

12:00:17 I do site planning.

12:00:19 But, I couldn't speak to what's been coming through

12:00:22 residential permitting.

12:00:23 Our lots are fairly small in a lot of places within the

12:00:26 city.

12:00:27 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Okay, thank you.

12:00:30 >>THOMAS SCOTT: The motion made by councilmen Mulhern,

12:00:35 a second, strike that language from the text amendment.

12:00:38 All in favor signify by saying aye.

12:00:41 Opposes?

12:00:42 >> Nay.

12:00:44 >> Thank you.

12:00:47 >> I didn't hear what the vote was.

12:00:52 >> The clerk needs to say it if you don't mind.

12:00:56 >> Motion carried with Saul-Sena and Dingfelder voting

12:01:01 no.

12:01:02 >> The next item at the bottom of page five, West Tampa

12:01:08 overlay changes.

12:01:09 Council motioned that on a trial basis, we look within

12:01:11 the West Tampa overlay district to look at testing a

12:01:15 code to deal with the re-use of existing structures.

12:01:19 Change of use issues.

12:01:22 This language was drafted couple years ago.

12:01:26 And we batted around.

12:01:28 The language that is before you is similar to that with

12:01:31 some modifications.

12:01:32 What we are carving out within the West Tampa overlay

12:01:35 district is the business core district.

12:01:37 It is east of Tampania, south of Columbus, west of

12:01:40 Albany and north of Cypress.

12:01:43 It is that core along those corridors you have a lot of

12:01:45 buildings either at zero lot line or built very close

12:01:49 to the parking lines.

12:01:51 Very limited parking.

12:01:52 A lot of those buildings sit vacant for a very long

12:01:55 period of time.

12:01:56 These changes allow potentially up to C end zoning

12:01:59 district type uses, which are neighborhood serving

12:02:02 commercial uses to go in and out of those buildings.

12:02:05 If they occupy medical uses less than 3,000 square

12:02:08 feet.

12:02:09 If they are restaurants with less than 100 person okay

12:02:13 pant load.

12:02:13 And then any other, can change in and out without

12:02:17 requiring additional parking spaces.

12:02:19 To give opportunity for some smaller businesses to get

12:02:21 in the door and see if they can actually make it work.

12:02:24 Second revision also classifies any of those parking

12:02:29 spaces that may maneuver within the right-of-way,

12:02:32 they're wholly within the private property and maybe

12:02:34 don't function per today's code, but the parking space

12:02:37 is actually on the property, it may back out into the

12:02:40 street, but the parking space as I said is on the

12:02:43 property.

12:02:43 Those are basically being recognized as being allowed

12:02:46 to remain through this change of use.

12:02:48 And then also recognizing that if there is any

12:02:52 on-street parking marked on the pavement, it also can

12:02:56 remain, doesn't necessarily have to be pulled out,

12:02:58 unless of course transportation goes out and finds it

12:03:00 is creating an unsafe situation and is a detriment to

12:03:05 safety and welfare.

12:03:06 So it is trying to recognize existing conditions and

12:03:09 allow some of that flexibility on a trial basis.

12:03:11 I figure we could let this sit for a couple cycles and

12:03:15 see how it goes.

12:03:16 In addition there's a separate handout.

12:03:20 A supplemental handout for West Tampa district, dealing

12:03:24 with the signage.

12:03:25 There was, there have been some discussions with the

12:03:28 West Tampa overlay folks that the signage could be

12:03:33 tweaked to match the newest sign code, because the old

12:03:37 sign code obviously allowed a ton of signage.

12:03:40 Their overlay had fairly restrictive signage.

12:03:44 I changed most of it to meet 20.5.

12:03:47 I left a provision in there that building signs are

12:03:50 limited to 25 square feet.

12:03:51 I did speak with Spencer Kass.

12:03:56 I believe he can speak to it as well.

12:03:58 It appears the West Tampa overlay committee is now just

12:04:01 fine with basically doing away with the sign standards

12:04:03 in West Tampa and going with the code itself.

12:04:06 Because the code itself is fairly restrictive.

12:04:08 I'll let him speak to that.

12:04:10 But if that is the case and Council motions so we can

12:04:13 actually take the sign regulations outs of West Tampa

12:04:16 completely because the new sign code is actually what

12:04:18 they want apparently.

12:04:20 That is it for the West Tampa provisions, if there's

12:04:22 any questions.

12:04:24 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Really quickly, you know how we are

12:04:27 trying to develop pedestrian activity on Howard and

12:04:30 Armenia?

12:04:30 Would there be any ability for perpendicular to the

12:04:34 street, pedestrian-oriented signs to be allowed?

12:04:37 By rote, where they won't have to ask for special

12:04:41 dispensation?

12:04:43 >> The signage usually is perpendicular.

12:04:46 They don't run it parallel because you wouldn't be able

12:04:48 to see it.

12:04:49 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I mean A frame signs or hanging from

12:04:52 the building signs, like if there's a building.

12:04:54 >> Oh, like awning signs?

12:04:56 Those are actually allowed under the sign code.

12:04:59 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Okay.

12:04:59 Good.

12:05:00 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Council, excuse me just for a minute.

12:05:02 We are past our lunch hour, our rule, we have locked on

12:05:08 to the restaurant for our Christmas function.

12:05:10 What do you want to do.

12:05:13 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I'd like to quickly going as quickly

12:05:15 as we can.

12:05:17 >> I don't know if that's feasible.

12:05:19 We probably have at least another half hour or more?

12:05:24 >> You also have two privately initiated amendments to

12:05:27 discuss as well.

12:05:28 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Come back at 1:30?

12:05:36 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I'll be here.

12:05:40 >> I have appointments, I can't be back at 1:30.

12:05:43 So you will have four.

12:05:47 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Are you available, Mr. Caetano?

12:05:50 >>I have to try to move some things around.

12:05:52 I made some appointments.

12:05:54 But I'll try to move around.

12:05:57 >> Cathy, how long would it take us to do the two

12:06:00 privately amended ones?

12:06:02 >> I think both of them, the second one for the

12:06:04 municipal airport, there are no objections.

12:06:07 The airport signed offer on it as well.

12:06:09 I think that's pretty straightforward.

12:06:11 The other ones were Hillsborough County Community

12:06:13 College.

12:06:14 There may be some discussion on your part.

12:06:15 But I think it's pretty straightforward.

12:06:20 >> The fence is going to be a little discussion.

12:06:22 >> Yes, I think there will be some discussion about

12:06:24 that.

12:06:24 >>THOMAS SCOTT: This is on West Tampa.

12:06:26 Let's deal with that one.

12:06:28 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Move the recommendation.

12:06:30 >>THOMAS SCOTT: We need to hear from the public.

12:06:31 Public on West Tampa and then we will deal with the two

12:06:34 initiated ones, try to get us out of here.

12:06:37 >> One quick note under four, item two.

12:06:40 >>THOMAS SCOTT: State your name for the record.

12:06:44 >>STEVE MICHELINI: Steve Michelini.

12:06:45 Item four, page six, right after where it says

12:06:49 provision 27-246.

12:06:52 And provided that the maneuver does not occur within

12:06:54 the drive lane of Armenia or Howard Avenue.

12:06:59 All of the on-street parking, maneuvers in the

12:07:02 right-of-way on Howard and Armenia, every bit of it.

12:07:03 If you just take that one provision out, then I think

12:07:06 that everything else is fine.

12:07:08 But, all the parallel park and all the parking, angle

12:07:12 parking that backs in the street, it all maneuvers in

12:07:14 the drive lane.

12:07:15 And I know the transportation doesn't like that.

12:07:18 >> Let me clarify.

12:07:19 I think what he's confused on, this parking that

12:07:22 they're talking about maneuvering within the

12:07:24 right-of-way is on-site parking.

12:07:26 On-street parking may remain.

12:07:28 Unless transportation takes it out.

12:07:31 >>STEVE MICHELINI: But even the case you have small

12:07:32 businesses, they can't move the building if it

12:07:34 maneuvers in the right-of-way.

12:07:36 If they're parking, for example, on Howard, you have

12:07:39 parking that backs in the right-of-way.

12:07:42 Part of it is on private property, part is on city

12:07:46 right-of-way.

12:07:46 It has to back into the drive lane.

12:07:48 If you leave that in there, you effectively are

12:07:51 removing all their parking, whether it is on street or

12:07:55 partially on street.

12:07:56 I'm just suggesting you take that provision out.

12:08:00 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: We can do that.

12:08:02 Are you done?

12:08:05 >>STEVE MICHELINI: I'm done.

12:08:06 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Anyone else from the public?

12:08:09 >> Spencer Kass representing -- I was at the West Tampa

12:08:13 Christmas party the other night.

12:08:14 They're very grateful to Council and staff for these

12:08:18 changes.

12:08:18 They appreciate it.

12:08:19 They are requesting we go under the sign codes the rest

12:08:22 of the city is governed by.

12:08:24 You're going to see even in the January cycle that they

12:08:26 are embracing businesses, they want people to have an

12:08:29 opportunity, small businesses to open.

12:08:31 They want to do as much as possible.

12:08:32 They want the streets activated.

12:08:35 These work great.

12:08:36 We just ask direction be given to staff to bring us --

12:08:39 we work on this five years.

12:08:43 And we thank you and staff.

12:08:45 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Okay.

12:08:45 Thank you.

12:08:48 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I move that we make the two

12:08:50 recommendations that were just made by the citizenry,

12:08:52 that we adopt the regular sign code and we bleat the

12:08:56 line about disallowing maneuvering.

12:08:59 >> The only thing I would say about Armenia and Howard,

12:09:02 the reason why those two streets are excluded, because

12:09:06 those are the two higher speed, higher capacity

12:09:08 roadways that are direct connections to I-275.

12:09:12 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Mr. Mick Lenny points.

12:09:14 >> However, but the current process is all these

12:09:17 properties come to City Council for that allowance to

12:09:19 keep that maneuvering.

12:09:20 Only those two streets specifically given the nature of

12:09:23 those roadways would have to come potentially to allow

12:09:26 that parking to remain and maneuver.

12:09:27 It was seen as a safety issue on those two streets.

12:09:31 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Honestly, West Tampa people think

12:09:32 that people drive too quickly through their

12:09:35 neighborhoods.

12:09:35 They wish they went more slowly so they could shop and

12:09:38 go to restaurants.

12:09:38 So the maneuvering makes people slow down so they don't

12:09:42 get creamed.

12:09:43 Do we have the ability to direct that change?

12:09:45 >> Do you.

12:09:46 I would not be doing my job if I didn't bring up the

12:09:49 alternative.

12:09:51 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: So my motion would be we eliminate

12:09:54 that and adopt the sign code.

12:09:58 >> Second.

12:09:59 >> Those are two separate items.

12:10:03 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Two actions within also direct what

12:10:07 Tampa changes.

12:10:11 >>THOMAS SCOTT: All in favor signify by saying aye.

12:10:13 Own policies?

12:10:15 [ Motion carried ]

12:10:16 >> I know you were going to jump to the two privately

12:10:20 initialed.

12:10:21 East Tampa was separate hand out.

12:10:22 Driven by the East Tampa land use committee.

12:10:24 There are minor changes, including some language about

12:10:27 sustainability and economically viable mixed use

12:10:30 community.

12:10:30 >> Does the clerk have that one?

12:10:33 >> Yes.

12:10:34 It was in the supplemental.

12:10:38 >> Is actually driven by the land use committee working

12:10:41 with staff.

12:10:42 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Going to take a lot of time?

12:10:44 >> No, no.

12:10:44 I mean I can briefly go through it.

12:10:47 There's just minor changes can.

12:10:49 Clarifications also, that before chain link and wood

12:10:53 fences were not allowed.

12:10:54 They do now allow black vinyl clad chain link or

12:10:58 decorative wire fencing.

12:11:00 That restriction they had before was too restrictive.

12:11:05 They did include desks for sustainable development to

12:11:08 go along with their intent.

12:11:09 They did include in building design standards, for the

12:11:12 single-family homes being built there, they don't want

12:11:15 just stucco or finish on the front. They want it all

12:11:19 the way around.

12:11:20 They want the aesthetic all the way around those

12:11:22 structures.

12:11:23 Then any other walls for fences built in the commercial

12:11:25 district really should be finished as well.

12:11:29 That's standard language throughout the rest of the

12:11:31 overlay district and they wanted the same treatment.

12:11:33 That's pretty much what it is.

12:11:35 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: So moved.

12:11:39 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Second.

12:11:40 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Anyone from the public wish to address

12:11:42 that.

12:11:44 >> Chairman of the land use committee.

12:11:45 We appreciate the change.

12:11:47 Thank you very much.

12:11:48 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Anyone else?

12:11:48 Been moved and second.

12:11:49 All in favor signify by saying aye.

12:11:52 Opposes?


12:12:00 >> The next amendment is the HCC amendment, Morris

12:12:06 Massey, the applicant.

12:12:08 >> Good afternoon, Council, Morris Massey here on

12:12:10 behalf of Hillsborough Community College.

12:12:13 As Council will remember, there was an issue about the

12:12:17 jurisdiction of the Barrio Latino Commission.

12:12:21 Design standards relative to the college.

12:12:23 In connection with the student services building.

12:12:26 We worked through the issues as they related to that

12:12:29 building with both the administration and with the

12:12:31 neighbors.

12:12:32 Part of the compromise that we reached was proffering

12:12:35 this proposed amendment to the code that would clarify

12:12:38 that the college is you subject to the design standard.

12:12:41 Unless there's a mandatory building code requirement

12:12:44 planned dated by state law.

12:12:45 And that's the purpose of the amendment.

12:12:48 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Anyone from the public wish to address

12:12:50 this item?

12:12:51 Anyone from the public?

12:12:52 Councilwoman Saul-Sena?

12:12:55 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Thank you.

12:12:55 Mr. Massey, the changes made to the building, because

12:12:57 of the public and City Council's involvement, were

12:13:01 much -- it is much better than it would have been.

12:13:03 It is still not great. And this is a terrific step and

12:13:06 I am pleased we are moving this direction.

12:13:09 >> Thank you.

12:13:10 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Is there a motion?

12:13:11 >> Question.

12:13:14 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Julia, so just for clarification,

12:13:19 they're required to comply with all provisions, does

12:13:24 that include going to the Barrio?

12:13:27 >> Yes, it does.

12:13:30 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Thank you, Mr. Massey.

12:13:32 >>THOMAS SCOTT: It's been moved and second.

12:13:33 That was moved by Councilwoman Saul-Sena, seconded by

12:13:36 Council Mulhern.

12:13:37 All in favor signify by saying aye.

12:13:40 Opposes?

12:13:41 Okay.

12:13:42 >> Thank you.

12:13:43 The second amendment, the applicant is Garner,

12:13:47 unfortunately had a conflict.

12:13:48 But as I mentioned before, there was opposition.

12:13:51 This particular change is allow a college use in the

12:13:53 MAP four district, which is the furthest outer ring

12:13:57 from the airport.

12:13:58 This has been reviewed by the legal department of the

12:14:00 airport authority as well as our legal department.

12:14:03 And there are no conflicts with our code or with their

12:14:06 language.

12:14:06 So there were no objections.

12:14:08 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Anyone from the public wish to address

12:14:10 Council on this item?

12:14:11 Councilwoman Saul-Sena?

12:14:14 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Move this.

12:14:16 >> Second.

12:14:17 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Moved and second.

12:14:21 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: Question on that. Cathy, there's no

12:14:24 impact to MacDill as related to this?

12:14:27 >> No, that is not an MAP district.

12:14:32 >> Thank you.

12:14:33 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Moved and second.

12:14:34 All in favor signify by saying aye.

12:14:36 What I'd like to do is pick up the rest of these this

12:14:40 afternoon -- our meeting, is it 5:30?

12:14:43 What time we meeting?

12:14:45 >> I have a 40th Street community planning session

12:14:48 tonight.

12:14:49 At 6:00.

12:14:53 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: This is at 5:30.

12:14:56 >> I'm also going almost to Temple Terrace.

12:15:01 >>THOMAS SCOTT: The meeting has been published for

12:15:03 5:30.

12:15:05 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I think we can speed through these.

12:15:08 The public has been here all morning.

12:15:09 It is important stuff.

12:15:11 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I have some changes on the fence

12:15:14 thing being typed up.

12:15:16 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: Who can come back at 1:30?

12:15:19 I being.

12:15:21 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I like the idea of trying to do it

12:15:23 this evening.

12:15:24 You can delegate somebody to cover for you.

12:15:27 Who's going to be for you here anyway tonight?

12:15:33 >> There's actually, we are short on staff tonight

12:15:35 because two of our staff, three of our staff members

12:15:37 will be here tonight for the meeting.

12:15:40 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: That's what I mean.

12:15:42 >> Going to be here tonight.

12:15:44 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: That's what with I am saying,

12:15:46 somebody who is here tonight can cover for you on the

12:15:48 rest of these.

12:15:48 >> They're doing the cases that are going before you

12:15:51 tonight.

12:15:51 >> If we put it on at the end of the meeting tonight.

12:15:54 >> At the end?

12:15:55 >> Yes.

12:15:56 Couldn't they just cover for you?

12:16:00 >> I'm not understanding.

12:16:01 >> Couldn't your staff people just cover for you so you

12:16:04 don't have to be here if we put them on the end of the

12:16:06 meeting tonight?

12:16:07 >> Oh, this language?

12:16:08 They could try.

12:16:09 I don't know if they're going to be able to answer all

12:16:12 the direct questions as to what happened when motions

12:16:14 were made or why language reads.

12:16:16 I mean, they could try.

12:16:19 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: You got Abbye?

12:16:20 >> I do.

12:16:23 >>JOHN DINGFELDER: I have great faith in Abbye.

12:16:29 >>LINDA SAUL-SENA: I'm available.

12:16:31 >>THOMAS SCOTT: My problem is --

12:16:35 >> If I need to be here at 5:30, I can be here at 5:30.

12:16:40 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Let's try to do it at 5:30.

12:16:43 Okay then.

12:16:46 We move to continue these items till 5:30.

12:16:51 >> So moved.

12:16:53 >>THOMAS SCOTT: Moved by Councilman Dingfelder,

12:16:55 seconded by Councilwoman Saul-Sena.

12:16:57 All in favor signify by saying aye.

12:16:59 Opposes?

12:17:00 Okay, we stand in recess then -- receiving files.

12:17:05 >> Second.

12:17:05 >>THOMAS SCOTT: All in favor signify by saying aye.

12:17:06 We stand in recess till 5:30.

12:17:09 Thank you.

The preceding represents an unedited version of
realtime captioning which should neither be relied upon
for complete accuracy nor used as a verbatim
The original of this file was produced in all capital
letters and any variation thereto may be a result of
third party edits and software compatibility issues.
Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the
proceedings may need to hire a court reporter.