TAMPA CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, September 8, 2011
Special Called Workshop
This file represents an unedited version of realtime
captioning which should neither be relied upon for complete
accuracy nor used as a verbatim transcript.
The original of this file was produced in all capital
letters and any variation thereto may be a result of third
party edits and software compatibility issues.
Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the
proceedings may need to hire a court reporter.
11:15:33 >>MARY MULHERN: This is a Tampa City Council special called
11:24:20 workshop meeting.
11:24:21 We are a little behind schedule.
11:24:23 We were hoping to start at 10:00.
11:24:26 It is now 11:25.
11:24:28 I am going to -- we are going to outline the process for
11:24:33 this meeting, because this is not a regular council meeting.
11:24:37 It's a special called workshop that council has scheduled.
11:24:44 And after roll call we are going to go over the process, and
11:24:48 council is going to let me know how we can proceed as far as
11:24:55 the busy agenda that we have for today.
11:24:57 So roll call.
11:24:57 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Here.
11:25:01 >>FRANK REDDICK: Here.
11:25:02 >>MARY MULHERN: Here.
11:25:03 >>HARRY COHEN: Here.
11:25:04 >>MARY MULHERN: Usual, part of our rules is we break at
11:25:11 But we don't have to do that.
11:25:13 We are going to have a discussion about that.
11:25:16 Our first item on the agenda is the citizens task force will
11:25:26 appear and make a ten minute presentation on alternatives to
11:25:29 incarceration of street solicitors in the event of adopting
11:25:35 a street solicitation ordinance.
11:25:37 I want to make clear to everyone here that this workshop is
11:25:41 not about council's action or discussion of a street
11:25:49 solicitation ordinance.
11:25:51 That is the second thing on our agenda.
11:25:53 So there will be an opportunity for the public to speak
11:25:57 after we have our scheduled presentation.
11:26:00 And for council to discuss this.
11:26:02 But we are only talking about the subject of this proposal,
11:26:09 which will involve -- it does involve a little more than
11:26:15 just if we adopt the street solicitation ban because we are
11:26:18 going to be talking about some of the big issues to do with
11:26:24 homelessness and joblessness in the city and in the country
11:26:29 right now.
11:26:29 So if you are here to speak specifically on panhandling or
11:26:34 solicitation, that will be in the second workshop agenda.
11:26:40 And I don't think there is anyway we will get to that before
11:26:43 we break for lunch.
11:26:44 So now I would like to -- normally, we give 15 minutes for
11:26:55 public comment on each item.
11:26:57 It would be very helpful to all of us if the people who wish
11:27:00 to speak to this first item on the agenda, not on
11:27:03 panhandling but anything to do with this possible proposal
11:27:07 for alternatives to incarceration, and dealing with
11:27:12 homelessness and unemployment.
11:27:14 Please stand up now if you want to talk on this first item
11:27:17 so we get an idea of how many people are here hoping to
11:27:19 speak on that.
11:27:21 Councilman Suarez.
11:27:22 >>MIKE SUAREZ: May I make a suggestion?
11:27:25 Since we do have a lot of folks here, here for the 10 a.m.
11:27:29 meeting, probably to speak specifically about the
11:27:32 solicitation ordinances, maybe we can take public comment
11:27:35 for item number 2 first before we go on to item 1.
11:27:39 I'm not sure if that would be the pleasure of the council,
11:27:41 but it may be a little bit of an easier process.
11:27:44 >>MARY MULHERN: Councilman Cohen?
11:27:47 >>HARRY COHEN: There may not be a whole lot of public
11:27:49 comment on item 1.
11:27:50 But perhaps we could deal with item 1, and before we break
11:27:53 for lunch make sure we take public comment on item 2.
11:27:56 >>MARY MULHERN: Let's see who is here for item number 1 and
11:28:01 that will help us figure this out.
11:28:03 >> So four people.
11:28:17 Three minutes each.
11:28:19 Staff after we hear the presentation, and I will ask you all
11:28:22 to please keep your comments -- if we have already heard it,
11:28:28 we don't need to hear it again, and we have been talking
11:28:31 about all these issues for a long time.
11:28:32 So just keep your comments brief so we can get through this
11:28:36 And be I believe Dr. Wilson is going to present his
11:28:42 And while he's walking up here, council, it's possible we
11:28:46 could be done by noon.
11:28:50 We could be.
11:28:52 >> For the first item.
11:28:54 >>MARY MULHERN: Well, we will be done with presentation,
11:28:56 public comment.
11:28:56 But I don't think we will be done with --
11:29:00 >> No.
11:29:01 >>MARY MULHERN: So does council want to go past noon?
11:29:05 And, if so, when do you want to break?
11:29:11 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I would like to make a motion that we go
11:29:13 past noon and until 12:30 for this first portion, and then
11:29:16 take a break and then come back for portion number 2.
11:29:20 I'm saying that now so that those folks that have things
11:29:23 that they need to do prior to that have been a set start
11:29:26 time so that they can come back, if they want to be stay
11:29:30 here force Ft. presentation they can.
11:29:33 That may be an easier way of kind of presenting it.
11:29:35 >>FRANK REDDICK: If we are coming back, what time are we
11:29:40 looking at coming back?
11:29:42 >>MIKE SUAREZ: My suggestion is that we take -- go to 12:30
11:29:45 and then take a regular hour lunch that we typically do, be
11:29:48 back here at 1:30 and should be able to get everything done
11:29:51 before our 6:00 p.m. meeting tonight.
11:29:53 That would be my suggestion.
11:29:54 >>MARY MULHERN: So that's what we are going tore do.
11:30:00 If you are here for the solicitation ordinance, this should
11:30:06 be of interest to you, but if you need to leave, we will be
11:30:09 back to get our recommendations from our legal department at
11:30:16 So if you need to leave, you can.
11:30:19 Thank you.
11:30:20 Dr. Jason Wilson.
11:30:23 >> Good morning.
11:30:25 Thanks to each of you for holding a special workshop on the
11:30:28 issue of street solicitation and arrest alternative program.
11:30:31 I thank you very much, Councilman Capin, for making the
11:30:35 motion at our July workshop to have this ten-minute
11:30:39 My name is Jason Wilson, an attending emergency medicine
11:30:43 physician at Tampa General Hospital and associate research
11:30:45 director of medicine at University of South Florida.
11:30:48 I'm coming to you today as a representative of a citizens
11:30:50 task force that was formed based off of a concern for the
11:30:55 prospect of criminalizing homelessness.
11:30:58 I don't represent any professional homeless provider
11:31:03 And if you go to the Elmo, you can see the other members of
11:31:06 our list that we are made up of.
11:31:09 Truly a citizen group.
11:31:10 Nereta Cormier, a teacher at Plant High School, Pat Kemp, an
11:31:25 attorney, and Sara Romeo of Tampa crossroads. We have met
11:31:28 with pretty much every homeless provider in the city of
11:31:28 Tampa, the coalition, other partners.
11:31:29 We ourselves are a citizen group who have sought to come up
11:31:33 with an alternative to criminalization of homelessness
11:31:36 during a difficult economic time.
11:31:38 We feel that during this period of time in the City of
11:31:40 Tampa, we are going through a very difficult economic
11:31:45 Hopefully it will shall the worst economic recession I see
11:31:47 in my lifetime.
11:31:48 And this period of time calls for-us thinking outside the
11:31:53 box and special creative solutions to a difficult problem.
11:31:58 The last homeless count had over 17,000 homeless individuals
11:32:03 People who are in doubled up housing and don't have a house
11:32:07 of their own.
11:32:08 We feel this changes the ballgame a little bit for what the
11:32:11 rules should be in responding to that, specifically an
11:32:14 epidemic if it was in the medicine world.
11:32:16 We call this an epidemic of homelessness right now.
11:32:19 I gave each of you a copy of this PowerPoint.
11:32:23 I didn't want to break the rules on the Elmo here.
11:32:30 I'm already past the 48 hour time line.
11:32:33 Why are we coming to you today for arrest diversion programs
11:32:38 are? We are coming dab --
11:32:39 >>MARY MULHERN: Dr. Wilson, because you're so call and soft
11:32:43 spoken, can you maybe raise the mike a little bit?
11:32:46 >> Is that better?
11:32:48 >>MARY MULHERN: That's better for me.
11:32:50 >> Can everybody else on council hear me? So we wanted to
11:32:53 come to you today because following my presentation, council
11:32:57 will consider a number of different street solicitation
11:33:01 We feel that while panhandling is a separate issue to
11:33:06 homelessness, it is a symptom of homelessness, a symptom of
11:33:09 an underlying problem, the tip of an iceberg of a bigger
11:33:13 And because of that, and because of the fact there's a lot
11:33:15 of public concern about this problem right now, it seems to
11:33:20 make a lot of sense to come at the same time to the
11:33:23 panhandling ordinance and is being discussed to discuss a
11:33:28 arrest diversion in case that ordinance is passed.
11:33:31 And so that's why we are here today.
11:33:33 In other words, in my line of work it doesn't make much
11:33:35 sense to treat the symptom if you are not going to treat the
11:33:38 disease itself.
11:33:39 That's what we are asking council to do.
11:33:41 >> When we started exploring ideas for arrest diversion in
11:33:51 the case of a street solicitation ordinance, it really was a
11:33:54 group of citizens in the City of Tampa.
11:33:57 We sought out to get input from all the homeless coalition
11:34:01 providers and professionals, who know a lot more about
11:34:05 homelessness than I do, and we basically started a small
11:34:08 group that's grown larger and larger as we met with more
11:34:13 There is people we met with in the coalition, partners that
11:34:16 we have been able to bring into this loop, include
11:34:19 Hillsborough County homeless coalition of Hillsborough
11:34:21 County, the Metropolitan Ministry Salvation Army arm, and
11:34:26 other partners, we talked were the Tampa Police Department,
11:34:28 Hillsborough County sheriffs depth office, so we talked
11:34:30 better this idea of the number of people involved, as we
11:34:34 talked with more and more people.
11:34:35 And way present to you today is two months worth of those
11:34:39 discussions and those meetings with people who work with
11:34:42 homelessness every day for a living, and working with us as
11:34:49 a citizen group.
11:34:50 What we are trying to do, what I am presenting to you today
11:34:52 is an arrest diversion program that creates a one-stop shop
11:34:55 for homeless services.
11:34:57 In other words, if the street solicitation ordinance we
11:35:02 don't know where we are going to take people who have
11:35:03 violate that ordinance.
11:35:04 At the same time that brings up a bigger question of where
11:35:06 are we going to take people that don't have any other place
11:35:08 to go to begin with.
11:35:10 While our homeless coalition partners do a very good job of
11:35:13 providing specific services to specific population it is
11:35:16 population is going to be most affected by the street
11:35:19 solicitation ordinance, one that's very underserved, and
11:35:22 that is mostly made up of single individuals.
11:35:25 We have to find something to do to help us, that regardless
11:35:29 of the street solicitation ordinance during economic
11:35:31 recession, we have to find something to do to help those
11:35:34 people who have fallen off of the margins.
11:35:37 So we think that a one stop shop triage type facility of
11:35:41 homeless services would allow people to leverage their
11:35:44 resources, each of the partners to leverage their resources
11:35:46 in a way to get the best economic bang for their buck.
11:35:49 It would also allow each homeless person to go to be a
11:35:52 facility, and find what services they qualify for, and then
11:35:56 have a place to stay while they wait for placement in those
11:35:58 services if that's appropriate.
11:36:00 So what I would like to do with the remaining few minutes I
11:36:03 have is talk with you about a model that we have examined in
11:36:06 another county, and then how we think that model might work
11:36:09 here in the City of Tampa.
11:36:15 What we don't want to do is compete with other agencies.
11:36:19 We don't want to take away resources from agencies that need
11:36:22 resource it is most.
11:36:23 So we have really tried to work on a proposal that is in
11:36:26 line with the goals and other agencies, in line with the
11:36:28 goals of law enforcement to divert people from a jail
11:36:34 system, court system, in line with the goals of homeless
11:36:39 coalition to reduce the number of people over a ten-year
11:36:42 period of time.
11:36:43 So we really are working to leverage resources, and dovetail
11:36:47 into the efforts of other groups that are already working on
11:36:50 these problems.
11:36:52 One question I have been asked before is whether or not
11:36:55 there's a role for the city in doing something like this.
11:36:59 It's a city involvement, social services.
11:37:02 I would like to point out that the city does administrator
11:37:04 the CDBG funds which go to social services and the city does
11:37:08 a very good job with that.
11:37:11 Other cities, smaller size even have been departments of
11:37:13 social services.
11:37:14 We don't need a department of social services.
11:37:17 We have the organizational structure in this city right now,
11:37:20 through boards and our department, to make use of these
11:37:24 I would just echo Councilman Montelione's comment earlier.
11:37:28 What we need is a conduit for professional grant writing,
11:37:30 and we need a conduit to compete for the funds that are
11:37:33 already there.
11:37:34 We don't want to tan things from the CDGB pie.
11:37:38 We want to expand that pie, make a larger pie for everybody
11:37:41 and could probably do that better if we create this conduit
11:37:44 for those fund.
11:37:44 There's also funds that we don't compete for, the Department
11:37:47 of Justice, and other federal organizations as well.
11:37:50 So we want to only compete for new resources and not take
11:37:54 away resources from those who need those resources the most.
11:37:58 We don't need more bureaucracy to our government.
11:38:01 We simply need to take advantage of use being appropriate
11:38:04 people in the government to do this.
11:38:08 And I think another thing, too, is that we are coming to you
11:38:12 today because not only the panhandling ordinance or street
11:38:15 solicitation ordinance on the table, but others are happy at
11:38:18 the same time as well.
11:38:19 Our city will be in the national spotlight next August, and
11:38:22 I think it's imperative that we show the nation who we are,
11:38:26 the Republican national convention comes, not show the
11:38:29 nation what we want to be but show the nation who we are,
11:38:31 and who we are as a city that can deal with a public safety
11:38:35 issue by addressing the issue itself, but also addressing
11:38:42 empathy to people affected by that issue.
11:38:44 So I think not only is there potential funding there with
11:38:47 the national Republican convention coming, there's
11:38:49 imperative for us as a city to be ready to demonstrate who
11:38:52 we are to the rest of the world.
11:38:53 So what I will do now is take you through a model that I
11:38:56 just looked at with members of the organization, and that
11:39:04 model is an arrest diversion program that exists over in
11:39:07 Pinellas County.
11:39:08 The model in Pinellas County called project save harbor is
11:39:12 very similar to a model seen in other parts in the country,
11:39:15 mainly San Antonio and Miami-Dade county.
11:39:17 The same consultant worked on all of those different
11:39:20 programs and they have been very successful in San Antonio,
11:39:24 Pinellas safe harbor opened recently last January, and when
11:39:31 it opened, it met a lot of controversy.
11:39:40 They have the leadership of the sheriff's office there.
11:39:42 And it takes one person to say I am going to get this done
11:39:44 and make this happen.
11:39:45 And when Pinellas safe harbor old, it is a facility that's
11:39:50 located in the city of Largo, and provides numerous services
11:39:55 at one location, something that our city does not have.
11:39:58 It allows the different coalition partners of the homeless
11:40:01 coalition there in Pinellas County to be bring their
11:40:03 resources to that location, or to connect clients to be
11:40:06 providers, in a more efficient way.
11:40:15 When Pinellas safe harbor opened, it was supposed to be
11:40:18 available 24 hours seven days a week, and it's available all
11:40:21 the time.
11:40:22 People can come to Pinellas safe harbor on their own or
11:40:25 through an arrest diversion.
11:40:28 The public defenders office is involved, the sheriff's
11:40:29 office is involved, there is kind of both nodes of the
11:40:35 algorithm before you are booked, after an arrest, or other
11:40:40 ordinance violations or just afterwards.
11:40:42 You have opportunities to go to be Pinellas safe harbor.
11:40:45 It's available 24 hours a day.
11:40:52 It represents a cost savings to the county and would
11:40:54 represent a cost savings to the City of Tampa and to
11:40:57 Hillsborough County as well.
11:40:58 To put somebody in jail for $126 a day in the hospital is
11:41:02 over $600.
11:41:03 We face commonly law enforcement not having the tools to
11:41:07 transfer people to appropriate places and bring them to my
11:41:10 hospital and putting them in the emergency department.
11:41:13 That is a very expensive and inappropriate place to house
11:41:16 people, and we are not able to connect people to the
11:41:19 services they need.
11:41:20 This represents a much more cost effective alternative to
11:41:26 In addition I would like to point out Pinellas safe harbor
11:41:30 has been very effective of in reducing the number of people
11:41:33 who end up in Pinellas County jails.
11:41:34 (Bell sounds)
11:41:35 That also represents a cost savings, and also allows
11:41:40 reduction of people to be end up in hospitals as well.
11:41:44 The Pinellas safe harbor opened.
11:41:48 It quickly worked to make itself not just a drain on county
11:41:51 resources but also a self-sufficient program, solar panels
11:41:57 to pay their utility bills.
11:41:59 One of the novel things about Pinellas safe harbor is that
11:42:02 it's a shelter that --
11:42:05 (Bell sounds).
11:42:06 >>MARY MULHERN: That's your ten minutes.
11:42:07 But how much more time do you think you need are?
11:42:09 >> Three.
11:42:10 >>MARY MULHERN: Can we give him another three minutes?
11:42:13 >> I appreciate it.
11:42:14 Thank you.
11:42:15 Pinellas safe harbor allows their residents to leave their
11:42:19 belongings behind when they go to look for a job each day.
11:42:22 That's something we don't have here in the City of Tampa.
11:42:24 This allows people to leave their belongings behind each
11:42:28 Food is provided by Metropolitan Ministries.
11:42:30 It allows us to leverage food in one location.
11:42:34 That's something that the city is struggling with now.
11:42:37 We don't do a very good job of leveraging our feedings in
11:42:40 one location each day.
11:42:41 Therefore people, it's difficult for homeless individuals to
11:42:44 find the feedings and typical for providers to provide the
11:42:48 most cost effective means for those individuals.
11:42:51 A group like the Tampa family health center would be able to
11:42:56 provide a medical van, has a mobile medical area as well.
11:43:04 The living conditions in Pinellas safe harbor are clean and
11:43:06 This is the women's living facility that you see here.
11:43:10 Funding comes mostly from federal sources.
11:43:12 The amount of funding that comes from the city itself is
11:43:14 very small, represented here on this slide, about $100,000
11:43:20 from the city.
11:43:20 The rest mostly comes from federal sources.
11:43:25 Over the past couple of months our group has talked with
11:43:27 numerous providers, and we have found out a few things that
11:43:32 all these providers have in common, and the first thing is,
11:43:37 we have to have more beds.
11:43:38 We need more beds.
11:43:39 And the problem is that you can't simply expect more beds to
11:43:43 appear at the facilities that already exist.
11:43:46 There's no room for them and the neighborhoods won't accept
11:43:49 So we can't just hope that we can put more beds in
11:43:52 facilities that are already there.
11:43:53 So we need more beds.
11:43:56 They currently don't have space for those beds.
11:43:58 While panhandling and homelessness are separate issues, what
11:44:01 we think is that while this is in the public perception, we
11:44:04 have a short window of time to act, on actually contributing
11:44:09 to the resolution of the disease, not just the symptom.
11:44:15 So our proposal is that we need to locate a facility that
11:44:18 can operate 24 hours a day, allow law enforcement to bring
11:44:23 individuals to that facility, allow our providers to also
11:44:30 bring people to the facility for more permanent placement
11:44:32 into their programs.
11:44:33 It would be a triage model, assessment area for homeless
11:44:36 services, a one-stop-shop, if you will.
11:44:39 People can get Social Security cards, driver's license,
11:44:43 other forms of ID, other things they need to get back on
11:44:46 their feet, and give us a centralized area of feeding, allow
11:44:49 utilization of resources in a very effective way.
11:44:53 So what we need first and foremost, support of providers,
11:44:58 which I think we found through hard work over the past
11:45:00 couple of months.
11:45:01 We need the support of city and county government.
11:45:03 We definitely need a facility.
11:45:05 And we need funding.
11:45:07 So the next steps will be to work harder to collaborate with
11:45:13 another program going on at the county level.
11:45:15 There's a mental health program at the county level.
11:45:18 I think that's very different than our program.
11:45:20 Our program targets all individuals for homeless service
11:45:27 A small subpopulation of individual.
11:45:30 30 second.
11:45:31 And help with businesses as well.
11:45:38 What we are asking you for is to help us find a facility to
11:45:43 create a triage assessment model that we have in mind so we
11:45:45 are going to need help doing that.
11:45:47 We are also going to have to have funding options.
11:45:49 We are going to need funding for this.
11:45:52 In the research we have done, we think there will be funding
11:45:54 available through CRA, through other federal programs in the
11:45:57 future, through CDBG fund, so there probably are funding
11:46:02 options available that we are not competing for right now.
11:46:05 And then what we ask is that any street cessation ordinance
11:46:11 that you consider today consider the underlying disease as
11:46:14 I think that's an important imperative of a street
11:46:17 solicitation ordinance, that we also consider ways to deal
11:46:20 with homelessness in our city as well.
11:46:23 And finally we would like to come back on the 22nd of
11:46:26 September, provide an update to you as to where we are at
11:46:30 the present.
11:46:31 So thank you very much.
11:46:31 Sorry I went over time.
11:46:33 I could take questions if you have them.
11:46:35 >>MARY MULHERN: Can I suggest that because you have been
11:46:40 working on this with a lot of us, the organizations and the
11:46:44 providers that are here and want to speak, that we hear from
11:46:48 them, and then after we hear from each of them, and if
11:46:52 council can ask them questions as they are speaking, but
11:46:55 then you can come back and you will -- we would all have
11:46:59 heard from everybody, and then --
11:47:02 >> Okay.
11:47:03 >>MARY MULHERN: So thank you very much.
11:47:12 Come forward if you wish to speak on this.
11:47:14 >> Okay.
11:47:25 >>MARY MULHERN: Yes.
11:47:30 This is a special called workshop on the proposal that we
11:47:33 just heard.
11:47:35 And we are only speaking to that item right now.
11:47:37 >> I'm Ed Tillou.
11:47:42 I ever spoken on this matter several times.
11:47:44 And I'm very familiar with alternatives, because in studying
11:47:48 engineering, also medicine, public health, as far as things
11:47:51 I've studied, safety, it's always a matter of providing
11:47:58 With respect to this whole matter, I have said often of that
11:48:07 I had the intent to write the Vatican most of all about
11:48:11 diocese of Orlando doing something about the fact that
11:48:14 church members are not allowed to feed people, even though
11:48:18 they are in Orlando.
11:48:18 But the die a sis of St. Petersburg also maybe needs to be
11:48:22 alerted to the first amendment from a slightly different
11:48:27 contained of way than ACLU often does.
11:48:30 This is the overlap of free speech and freedom of religion.
11:48:35 And I for instance heard about this meeting from someone, I
11:48:38 heard it from Mr. Reddick.
11:48:39 That was a church person that told me about this to come
11:48:44 People going to go to lunch.
11:48:47 I haven't had breakfast.
11:48:48 I come a long way to make these -- to speak.
11:48:53 I haven't written these letters yet because I have been
11:48:56 doing what I am supposed to be doing, researching a novel
11:48:59 I'm trying to read -- to write.
11:49:02 And what that novel has required me to do is something I
11:49:06 have avoided for many years.
11:49:09 Looking into the French revolution and Napoleon which will
11:49:13 be about 40% of my novel.
11:49:15 Now, as I go over the French revolution, I am continually
11:49:19 amazed at what we have now, like, for instance, the second
11:49:25 member of the committee of 30 has come on board.
11:49:28 That's Warren buffet.
11:49:29 The first person to come on board with this was Bill Gates'
11:49:38 Now, these little pieces of Napoleon, you have the rich not
11:49:46 paying enough taxes, and if we have maybe more people paying
11:49:50 their shares in taxes, we'll have more alternatives, because
11:49:55 employment hasn't been one of the alternatives for many
11:49:58 people these days.
11:50:03 There's always fallacies of logic at work, like somehow
11:50:07 police time will be saved.
11:50:10 (Bell sounds)
11:50:11 But what about crime increases?
11:50:14 That will use a lot of police time.
11:50:16 Safety, some motorist was distracted by a panhandler, and
11:50:23 there was an accident, and right away the panhandler was
11:50:27 blamed, rather than scrutinize more.
11:50:30 >>MARY MULHERN: Sir, we are not discussing that right now.
11:50:33 >> Well, what I am saying is that there's a whole framework
11:50:38 involved here, in which people have to be provided
11:50:42 (Bell sounds).
11:50:43 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
11:50:47 >> Good morning members of the council.
11:50:53 My name is Rayme Nuckles, Homeless Coalition, 25 North
11:51:01 Just to kind of point out a couple of things Dr. Wilson has
11:51:05 met with members of the coalition, several of the
11:51:09 executives, also did meet with him.
11:51:11 We have had some great meetings and discussion with this.
11:51:17 I want to remind you that many of the things that are being
11:51:19 discussed with regard to this alternative is part of the
11:51:23 ten-year plan that we published in 2002, and hopefully this
11:51:34 citizens task force process will move into implementing
11:51:38 something that will assist the members in this community
11:51:42 that are homeless but one of the things I did want to point
11:51:47 out to you is that with the homeless prevention and rapid
11:51:52 rehousing funding that was provided, the stimulus package
11:51:56 from the City of Tampa, we have been able to assist with all
11:51:59 of our partner organizations over 325 household in this
11:52:04 90% of those were stabilized into permanent housing while
11:52:09 10% of those were stabilized into transitional housing, and
11:52:15 I think that goes to the success of our current organization
11:52:18 and the hard work that they are doing, but I do want to
11:52:22 remind you that most of the organizations who are working
11:52:27 diligently to meet the needs of this community with regard
11:52:30 to homelessness are maxed out with regard to the case
11:52:35 managers that they have on staff, the funding that they
11:52:37 have, and implementing a new process like this will involve
11:52:43 additional resources to meet that need.
11:52:45 Thank you.
11:52:45 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
11:52:50 >> Morris Simpson, Metropolitan Ministries, 2002 North
11:52:55 Florida Avenue.
11:52:58 I just come before you to commend Dr. Wilson's team for what
11:53:06 they are setting forth, and to pledge as I have in the past
11:53:12 before the council that Metropolitan Ministries and many
11:53:16 other agencies like us certainly stand ready to be
11:53:20 cooperative and partner together that we may address not as
11:53:29 Dr. Wilson has referred to has just symptoms and things but
11:53:34 actual people.
11:53:35 The line in patch Adams' movie where Robin Williams says
11:53:40 something like this:
11:53:42 When you treat the disease, you often always lose.
11:53:46 But when you treat patients, you always win.
11:53:48 And I think if we can make this about the people that are
11:53:53 homeless and the people that are struggling with joblessness
11:53:56 and all, I think we can come together and focus on that and
11:54:00 feel connected as a community rather than just talking about
11:54:04 an issue.
11:54:07 One comment I want to make is that we do believe in
11:54:10 collaborative partnerships, and we would certainly encourage
11:54:14 the city and the county and the agencies be, as well as the
11:54:20 corporate faith and university and health care facilities
11:54:25 all come together, and make this thing work.
11:54:29 I traveled to San Diego this summer and visited a couple
11:54:36 projects there.
11:54:37 I was in San Antonio and visited their project.
11:54:42 You are all familiar we've safe harbor, which we are
11:54:44 involved with, and there are not Utopias out there, but
11:54:51 there are people that have the right principles and the
11:54:55 right approach to be try to alleviate the suffering that's
11:54:57 going on.
11:54:59 Be and so I just want to commend City Council for making
11:55:03 this a priority, and we pledge Metropolitan Ministries and
11:55:09 our support we will do what we can to work together to bring
11:55:14 Thank you.
11:55:14 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
11:55:18 >> Tom Atchinson, 1511 East Bougainvillea, pastor of New
11:55:24 Life Church of God and founder of New Beginnings of Tampa.
11:55:27 We have about a 35-bed emergency shelter, and also 100-plus
11:55:32 beds for formerly homeless veterans, and we have a special
11:55:36 women's veterans program.
11:55:39 This is a great program, but we do need to -- I believe
11:55:45 there is a sleeping giant out there that we really do need
11:55:48 to address.
11:55:49 There are many great organizations in Tampa that are in the
11:55:51 forefront, but there are many, many faith-based
11:55:55 organizations, many churches out there that are doing a
11:55:57 great job in a smaller way, trying to meet the needs of the
11:56:01 And to help them.
11:56:04 But there's no collaboration between a lot of the smaller
11:56:08 They are kind of just out there.
11:56:09 So I would like to also see, in addition to what Dr. Wilson
11:56:14 has been talking about, there would be more of an element of
11:56:17 bringing in some of the smaller ones, some of the people
11:56:19 that are out there trying to do their job.
11:56:21 Obviously, we all know that the majority of people on the
11:56:25 street, a lot of them are just a pill away from being
11:56:29 mentally able to handle a job and do what they need to do.
11:56:33 Most of them have drug and alcohol problems.
11:56:35 If we stop the feedings out there, and we pass the
11:56:39 panhandling ordinance, which I think is a great idea, that's
11:56:42 not going to solve the problem.
11:56:44 That's just going to make it worse, if we don't go ahead and
11:56:47 take some actions at instituting some program, some support,
11:56:52 and also the collaboration that is needed between not just
11:56:56 the main organizations in Tampa, but several organizations,
11:57:00 faith-based originals out there that really just need to be
11:57:03 coordinated, need a little bit of help, a little bit of
11:57:07 support tore bring them onboard with us.
11:57:09 Thank you.
11:57:09 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
11:57:12 Councilman Suarez?
11:57:13 >>MIKE SUAREZ: If you could remind the members -- members
11:57:17 of the audience that we are dealing with issue number 1.
11:57:19 Because I have seen people starting to get up.
11:57:21 If there's anybody that wants to talk about this particular
11:57:26 >>MARY MULHERN: Right.
11:57:27 We are talking about the proposal for arrest diversion, and
11:57:31 about services for homelessness.
11:57:36 >> Patricia Kemp, 5018 Seminole Avenue in Tampa.
11:57:41 Thank you all so much for doing this workshop this morning.
11:57:43 I think it's so important.
11:57:45 Also, I want to say that Candy Olson, I saw her outside,
11:57:49 sends her regrets.
11:57:50 She wasn't able to stay to make comment herself.
11:57:53 These comments are mine.
11:57:54 I know we are going to hear much about panhandling, and we
11:57:58 have heard some about homelessness, and the connection
11:58:02 between the two, and they are not the same thing.
11:58:05 But they are related, and I think of it like a diagram with
11:58:09 overlapping circles.
11:58:12 Several of the issues, joblessness, low-paying jobs, lack of
11:58:16 affordable housing in our community, and substance abuse,
11:58:19 lack of education in training job skills, transportation, or
11:58:23 lack thereof.
11:58:24 The number one need right now in Hillsborough County is
11:58:29 We need beds.
11:58:30 And anybody who says that that's not the number one need is
11:58:35 really not dealing with what's out there on the streets.
11:58:38 We have 17,000 people in this county who find themselves
11:58:41 homeless each night, 1500 beds, which from what I understand
11:58:46 has been approximately the same for the last ten years, and
11:58:48 I think not providing more beds doesn't fill a critical need
11:58:53 in this county.
11:58:55 Providing beds is compassionate and humane in terms of
11:58:58 resources and how to spend our dollars.
11:59:00 It costs less than homelessness and mental illness and
11:59:04 sometimes saves and changes peoples lives.
11:59:08 This City Council cannot do this alone.
11:59:11 The county commission is absolutely an important partner in
11:59:15 tackling this problem in Hillsborough County, which is so
11:59:17 critical right now.
11:59:19 I have been through the safe harbor shelter in Pinellas
11:59:22 County and talked extensively with other whose have much
11:59:25 more knowledge than me about homelessness and the kind of
11:59:28 things that people are facing.
11:59:30 We need a safe harbor in Hillsborough County.
11:59:33 That is, we need a place that has something like the
11:59:36 approximately 300 beds that safe harbor has, that has
11:59:39 one-stop shopping with social services, caseworkers, medical
11:59:43 services on-site, that's open 24/7 that provides people with
11:59:47 three good meals a day, a place where people can leave their
11:59:51 belongings during the day, and begin to deal with the issues
11:59:57 that are facing them and why they are homeless.
11:59:59 I would like to recognize Pinellas County sheriff Jim coats
12:00:03 in Pinellas for having the vision, the leadership, the
12:00:07 compassion, the common sense to open, to be behind a place
12:00:10 like safe harbor, in what was a former jail.
12:00:13 That's what safe harbor was, a former jail.
12:00:19 I urge each of you to visit safe harbor.
12:00:22 My hope is that each of the county commissioners will do so,
12:00:26 also, and that we will have more leadership in the form of
12:00:30 an individual group of people who can bring something like
12:00:34 safe harbor to our community here.
12:00:36 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
12:00:38 >> Good afternoon, council members.
12:00:45 I'm Mike Doyle, a resident of South Tampa, and a volunteer
12:00:51 member of the homeless coalition of Hillsborough County.
12:00:56 You have heard the comments before about faith-based
12:00:59 I'm a member of a very large faith-based organization in
12:01:02 South Tampa.
12:01:02 I'm very interested in working, helping and collaborating in
12:01:07 that area.
12:01:07 I also want to offer a reminder to all of us that the truest
12:01:11 test of a society is how they treat most marginalized, most
12:01:16 vulnerable citizens.
12:01:18 Thank you.
12:01:18 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
12:01:21 >> My name is Francine Simmons, and I guess I am here as a
12:01:32 As you may know, my then 16-year-old son started a homeless
12:01:36 outreach, across the street, until the city decided to put
12:01:44 restrictions on that.
12:01:46 And we all completely understand that.
12:01:49 Because our police and our city officials serve all, not
12:01:53 just homeless or mentally -- anyway, this idea is so great.
12:02:01 As a small, you know, volunteer-based outreach system
12:02:06 serving homeless, whether it be food or clothing or
12:02:10 materials that they need, personal products, or just
12:02:15 We can't do that on city grounds without a permit.
12:02:19 Completely understood.
12:02:19 But when we reach out to our private churches or businesses
12:02:26 to ask for their permission, they are not willing to do it.
12:02:32 This is such a great idea because there are so many people
12:02:34 and so many groups that want to reach out, and they can't.
12:02:38 They have been held back.
12:02:40 Please, think about this hard and strong.
12:02:43 This is such a great idea.
12:02:45 And I would also recommend Dr. Wilson and team, talk with
12:02:49 your Parks and Recreation Department here in the city.
12:02:52 They have great ideas, lots of experience, and great ideas.
12:03:00 Thank you.
12:03:00 >>MARY MULHERN: If there's anyone else who wishes to speak
12:03:02 on this, please come and stand up and be ready, because we
12:03:06 are running over and have more people speaking than we
12:03:12 We didn't budget our time that way.
12:03:14 So just please stand up now if you are planning to speak and
12:03:17 if you are able to stand up.
12:03:19 Thank you.
12:03:19 >> Good afternoon.
12:03:23 My name senior Roy McCraney.
12:03:26 I have been a resident of Tampa since 1953.
12:03:29 If you do your math that's a total of 58 years.
12:03:32 And I never heard or seen anything like what's been going on
12:03:36 around Tampa recently in regards to people at the
12:03:40 intersections panhandling.
12:03:41 I call these people professional panhandlers.
12:03:44 >>MARY MULHERN: Sir, we are not discussing that right now.
12:03:48 That's going to be at 1:30 we are going to come back and
12:03:52 talk about that.
12:03:52 >> Well, I think there's a distinction between homelessness
12:03:56 and panhandling.
12:04:01 I think it's an eyesore.
12:04:02 >>MARY MULHERN: Sir, sir, thank you.
12:04:04 We are going to be discussing that at 1:30.
12:04:07 If you want to come back and talk about panhandling.
12:04:10 Thank you.
12:04:15 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Do we need a motion to go back past our
12:04:19 >>MARY MULHERN: We are going to 12:30 with our discussion.
12:04:22 Thank you.
12:04:22 Unless you have something to say.
12:04:24 >> About 1:30 then?
12:04:26 >>MARY MULHERN: Come back at 1:30 and you can have your
12:04:30 say, your three minutes.
12:04:31 Thank you.
12:04:31 >> Thank you.
12:04:32 >>MARY MULHERN: Next.
12:04:36 >> My name is Mary Lynn Ulrey, CEO at Dacco at 4422 east
12:04:43 Columbus drive.
12:04:44 I live at 3612 Southwest Santiago in Tampa.
12:04:47 I'm here because I certainly support Dr. Wilson and the
12:04:52 group, the community group that got together, their
12:04:56 There is a flagrant fallacy that there are services
12:05:01 available into Dacco or north side or HC.
12:05:08 We are really stripped right now of being able to be provide
12:05:10 additional services without some more help.
12:05:12 And we need to just make that clear.
12:05:15 We certainly support the idea.
12:05:16 We certainly want to be part of it.
12:05:18 When you talk about case managers coming and helping, 50% of
12:05:22 the people that you would have shelter life would have
12:05:25 substance abuse or mental health issues.
12:05:27 So I want to mention that because I'm a realist.
12:05:30 We already provide more than a million dollars in services
12:05:34 that are unfunded at this point at Dacco.
12:05:37 Just to let you know where that is, we certainly want to be
12:05:40 part of this.
12:05:41 The other thing I wanted to mention is that -- I think
12:05:48 that's it.
12:05:49 Thank you.
12:05:49 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you very much.
12:05:57 Council, I think Mr. Wilson, if you would like to come up,.
12:06:02 Does council have questions for him?
12:06:08 Councilman Suarez.
12:06:11 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Hi, Dr. Wilson, how are you?
12:06:15 Good to see you.
12:06:16 First, I want to applaud you and your entire group in trying
12:06:19 to solve something that is seemingly unsolvable.
12:06:22 [ Applause ]
12:06:23 And that wasn't a applause but thank you very much for
12:06:29 applauding him.
12:06:30 It shows a lot of hard work and knowledge has gone into this
12:06:32 but I do have been somebody questions specifically to be
12:06:34 what you have said.
12:06:38 I know the facts are in spot.
12:06:41 I think this last figures I heard was there was about 17,000
12:06:44 homeless at any one time during any day during the week.
12:06:48 That's a lot of people.
12:06:50 And we know that we do not have a lot of beds in this
12:06:55 Some of the things that have been happening at Pinellas safe
12:06:57 harbor, I want to be ask you about, because I have looked at
12:07:00 the total number that you had on the funding and it looks
12:07:02 like it's about 1.2 something?
12:07:06 I was looking at your numbers.
12:07:08 I want to make sure we were right on that.
12:07:11 Because most if not all of it is federal funding, what is
12:07:16 your perception and what's the perception of some of the
12:07:19 professional groups that you have talked to about the lack
12:07:22 of federal funding that may not be coming our way because of
12:07:26 budget impasses up in Washington, D.C.?
12:07:30 >> So I think that right now, even though we have been
12:07:37 fortunate with funding, we can do better.
12:07:39 And is it going to be better in our community commission?
12:07:43 Yes, it's going to be difficult to believe do better.
12:07:44 So that's why I think one of our priorities has to be that
12:07:47 we need -- attack and be as aggressive as possible.
12:07:53 We are not going to get fund without a conduit.
12:07:55 If we don't have the entity in existence, then we can't get
12:07:58 the funds for that entity.
12:07:59 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Let me ask you a structural question because
12:08:03 that does kind of lead into our next question.
12:08:05 The structure for safe harbor includes county, cities, and
12:08:11 some of the providers doing it.
12:08:15 It seems to me what you are saying is that the city is a
12:08:18 stronger conduit or abettor access point for these federal
12:08:22 dollars as opposed to a coalition of providers.
12:08:26 Is that correct?
12:08:28 >> I think the city is one place we have to start.
12:08:31 And I think that eventually we have to have a coalition of
12:08:34 multiple municipalities.
12:08:38 When I look at the people I need to talk with to bring into
12:08:41 this, there was a huge list of people, community people at
12:08:45 the county level and it has to start somewhere.
12:08:47 I thought it was imperative to have the city on board when
12:08:50 we go to the county and tray to come up with a group
12:08:52 together to go after those fund.
12:08:54 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Because one of the things, it begs the
12:08:58 question when you look at this, these are probably -- and I
12:09:01 may be wrong about this, community grants from across the
12:09:04 country, you know, what makes us different than other cities
12:09:07 or other nonprofits that are going after the same dollars.
12:09:10 And because the federal money is shrinking, you know, is
12:09:15 having the city and county involved more important?
12:09:18 My guess is it would be, than to have just a group of
12:09:22 individual providers coming together as a coalition
12:09:25 >> Right.
12:09:27 So I think bringing in people like the public defenders
12:09:30 office, the sheriff's office and other people in the
12:09:32 municipality of the county, it's critical.
12:09:34 The public defenders office and sheriff's office are two
12:09:36 great examples.
12:09:37 There are things that we just don't do right now, that they
12:09:39 can compete for grants for if we did.
12:09:41 And that's what's happened over in Pinellas County.
12:09:44 The grants from the department of corrections, the
12:09:46 Department of Justice, have funded a large part of this
12:09:49 And we just don't do those programs right now.
12:09:51 It not that we don't any arrest diversion.
12:09:53 They do a great job of arrest diversion.
12:09:55 There's other things we could do that would make us
12:09:59 competitive for those funds.
12:10:00 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Madam Chair, if you don't mind I have just
12:10:03 one more question, kind of a two-part question.
12:10:05 You know, your last -- one of your last frames, it says what
12:10:09 we need is a facility and funding, which, you know, those
12:10:12 are the two big nuts to make, okay.
12:10:15 Have -- two things.
12:10:17 Have you looked at what kind of funding that you would be
12:10:21 asking from the city for as an amount?
12:10:24 Obviously I know that's difficult because you have to cobble
12:10:29 together all these federal dollars in there, and we see what
12:10:31 the amount is from the city of St. Petersburg.
12:10:33 And we have a very tight budget, as you know.
12:10:35 Then secondly, have you all looked at a facility and where
12:10:38 it's located?
12:10:39 Because choosing a facility becomes another political issue,
12:10:43 as I'm sure you understand, and understand what happened
12:10:46 with sacred heart church and some of the folks that we are
12:10:50 trying to put together a homeless coalition then a few years
12:10:55 back with the county.
12:10:56 So what have you found out ever?
12:10:58 >> Let me say a couple things about that.
12:11:00 First of all, these ideas aren't brand new.
12:11:03 We don't just make these ideas up.
12:11:05 These are smart people who have been working on these things
12:11:07 for a long period of time.
12:11:09 We are trying to coalesce them together right now.
12:11:11 So the idea of a site and facility has been brought up
12:11:15 before, and it didn't work ten years ago, five years ago,
12:11:18 but there are is a very different time right now.
12:11:20 The pressure is there right now, and the situation is there
12:11:22 right now, because people are suffering so much.
12:11:24 So I think in that respect, reexploring the issue is fair
12:11:29 Now, there are facilities, I think, that we have to think
12:11:32 B.one of the facility when we started this sort of -- it was
12:11:35 obvious to us that we look at was the old orient road jail.
12:11:39 And it is no longer going to be used as a jail.
12:11:42 It's only going to be used as a booking facility.
12:11:44 And the Pinellas safe harbor site was an old jail as well.
12:11:47 We will certainly aren't proposing we ship homeless people
12:11:50 off to have a jail.
12:11:51 We are trying to decriminalize this.
12:11:53 So it be takes two make it feel like they are not in jail.
12:11:56 There's some problems with that H.we went to the sheriff's
12:11:58 office, and we went to Sheriff Gee and talked to him about
12:12:01 the jail.
12:12:02 There are some technical problems with the jail that make it
12:12:04 a little different than Pinellas County that makes it a
12:12:06 difficult site.
12:12:07 The sheriff's office is supportive and is helping us with
12:12:10 sites right now.
12:12:11 But what we really need now is to reach out to the jail site
12:12:15 and reach out to the city to help us find sites and the
12:12:18 private business as well.
12:12:19 We would like to not -- to make the least possible cost for
12:12:24 the city, we don't want to spend money on cap tam if we
12:12:27 don't have to, on the building itself if we don't have to.
12:12:29 We don't want to spend money on transforming this facility.
12:12:33 That we don't have to spend.
12:12:35 The so the closest building that is ready to go.
12:12:39 An old hotel site, places like that make great places for
12:12:47 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Again, thank you very much for working on
12:12:48 this on your very valuable time.
12:12:52 One of the things you mentioned, and it was the
12:12:55 incarceration amount, the dollars that it cost to arrest and
12:13:02 If this ban is passed.
12:13:04 And I believe your intent is less than 126.
12:13:08 It might be 100.
12:13:09 And I have been here a little over a year on council.
12:13:17 This is my fifth meeting that will be coming up next.
12:13:23 And the very first meeting, I brought up the very issue of
12:13:27 how much it costs, and we need to look at it, to arrest and
12:13:33 incarcerate someone if this is outlawed.
12:13:38 I was looking out for the taxpayer.
12:13:42 And amongst other things.
12:13:48 You have people that are constantly picked up at the rate of
12:13:53 $100 each.
12:13:56 It can get very substantial.
12:13:58 That's one thing.
12:13:59 We need to ask you, do you know the size of the building in
12:14:03 Pinellas, the square footage?
12:14:06 >> I don't remember off the top of my head.
12:14:08 I can get it to you.
12:14:09 It had a court yard facility and women's area and men's
12:14:14 Together they can house about 350 people safely and
12:14:18 We have the square footage.
12:14:21 I don't know off the top of my head.
12:14:22 >> The other thing that I would like to maybe look at -- I'm
12:14:28 sorry, we don't have the buttons to our legislative aide.
12:14:32 So the only way we can communicate is to call, but that's
12:14:38 okay, I've got it.
12:14:43 I want to maybe -- I did ask for parcels of property prior
12:14:50 to this, that I thought of an area that I felt might be --
12:14:58 that the city owns.
12:15:00 And I did receive that.
12:15:02 But I would like to make a formal recommendation that maybe
12:15:08 this might be a way to look at this is that the children's
12:15:12 museum is there because the city provided the land, and then
12:15:18 the fund were brought up.
12:15:19 I know it's a longer process than finding a building, and
12:15:23 the issue is now.
12:15:25 But that might be a way of public and private together
12:15:29 making something like this happen.
12:15:34 I would like to look at it maybe after more questions are
12:15:39 asked, is for the city to maybe bring forth what parcels we
12:15:45 do own, that maybe this would work on, or even if it's land
12:15:50 that maybe we can again do a partnership, just as the
12:15:55 children's museum was done.
12:15:59 The city did donate that land to them.
12:16:01 So this is just, I feel, just as important if not -- well,
12:16:09 not more important but just as important.
12:16:11 The children are very important.
12:16:14 That's just one of the things.
12:16:17 What I looked at was along 30th street, 30th Avenue,
12:16:23 around the Crosstown, because I happened to go to the
12:16:25 citizens police academy, and was driving by there all the
12:16:30 time, and thought that there is really -- one of the issues
12:16:35 we had before was the neighborhood's proximity to when they
12:16:40 tried to set up a shelter.
12:16:45 But this area is pretty isolated, but at the same time has
12:16:49 access from the expressway and close to police.
12:16:56 So I did ask about that property.
12:16:59 But I would really rather make it more formal.
12:17:03 So I will wait till the other questions, and then maybe add
12:17:06 to it to see where we are at.
12:17:09 Thank you.
12:17:10 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Hi, Dr. Wilson.
12:17:17 And thank you for the work you put in.
12:17:20 I know you have a really tight schedule to spend this amount
12:17:22 of time along with the others is really a tremendous effort
12:17:25 that you have put forth.
12:17:26 I do have a few questions.
12:17:28 We did talk prior to your embarking on this two-month
12:17:34 investigation into the issues.
12:17:36 But I hadn't been briefed on this, so excuse me if I ask
12:17:39 some questions that may seem basic.
12:17:43 But who operates Pinellas safe harbor?
12:17:46 What is the entity?
12:17:47 >> The sheriff's office.
12:17:48 >> The sheriff's office does.
12:17:49 And you have had conversations with Hillsborough County
12:17:51 Sheriff Gee?
12:17:52 >> We have.
12:17:53 >>LISA MONTELIONE: He's and he's supportive of this had.
12:17:56 >> He's supportive of the concept of this.
12:17:58 >>LISA MONTELIONE: So with Pinellas safe harbor it's a
12:18:01 collaboration really between government entities.
12:18:04 There isn't a lot of private enterprise money or private
12:18:08 donations coming in?
12:18:10 >> There is some now.
12:18:12 Over the past month or two, some has started to come in.
12:18:15 When start-up hand during this thing when that began, there
12:18:18 really wasn't much at all.
12:18:19 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Okay.
12:18:22 Has your group met with the mayor's office?
12:18:24 >> Not directly.
12:18:25 >>LISA MONTELIONE: I suggest that something that you do,
12:18:29 because although we can, as a council, make recommendations
12:18:35 or look for funding or ways of bringing funding forward, if
12:18:43 we are asking for any budget fund we need to have the
12:18:45 support, both of council and the administration to make
12:18:48 something happen.
12:18:51 So that have been will be the suggestion that I would make.
12:18:53 The CDBG funding, I talked about this, and talked about this
12:18:57 and talked about this.
12:18:59 It's a competitive application process.
12:19:02 So, you know, when we get into -- and I think it's coming
12:19:06 >> We are just right off cycle this last time.
12:19:10 Right after we had talked, the letter that you guys have to
12:19:12 go to the federal agencies, that's been done, so we are just
12:19:16 a little off cycle.
12:19:17 >> That's the next cycle coming up.
12:19:19 It in the immediate future.
12:19:21 So we need to -- if you are going to move this forward and
12:19:25 request CDBG fund, that's got to be looked at right away.
12:19:29 And I'm sure you can meet were staff and they can help with
12:19:32 that process.
12:19:32 There was one thing that you said that I do want to make
12:19:39 clear, that we are not taking this action because of the
12:19:42 2012 RNC coming to Tampa.
12:19:45 >> That's right.
12:19:45 >> I want to make that abundantly clear, because tieing the
12:19:50 two together even in the same paragraph kind of gives me the
12:19:55 But, you know, I want to make that clear.
12:19:57 >> For our group, this is about a situation we see every
12:20:00 day, either in our lines of work.
12:20:03 There's 500 homeless children in school districts right now.
12:20:07 I brought a teacher to the table.
12:20:09 The buff constituents obviously struggling as well.
12:20:13 >> And Councilman Suarez and Councilwoman Capin have been
12:20:16 already brought up the location.
12:20:19 And that is difficult.
12:20:20 And I was going to talk about the locations of Hillsborough
12:20:22 County Hillsborough been done a number of years ago but they
12:20:27 have already done that for me.
12:20:28 And there is -- there are always has to be a lead agency,
12:20:34 and it typically has to be someone or an entity that has
12:20:37 been in business, as a lead agency identified?
12:20:41 >> Well the homeless coalition has been supportive.
12:20:44 We want to work closely with them with whatever we do next.
12:20:47 >> I don't know if it's appropriate at this time to ask.
12:20:51 Mr. Knuckles a question.
12:20:53 >>MARY MULHERN: It's appropriate but we have nine months
12:20:55 Not everyone on council has spoken.
12:20:57 We have to decide.
12:20:59 We are going to break at 12:30.
12:21:01 >>LISA MONTELIONE: I just have a couple more questions,
12:21:05 since the homeless coalition is here.
12:21:07 >>MARY MULHERN: Well, if council is willing to, and you are
12:21:11 willing to go past 12:30, we are going into our lunch hour.
12:21:15 So do you want to come back?
12:21:21 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I'm willing to give ten more minutes if
12:21:23 that's okay.
12:21:23 >>LISA MONTELIONE: We are going to go ten more minutes?
12:21:27 >>MARY MULHERN: An extra ten minutes.
12:21:28 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Some sort of consensus and announcement.
12:21:33 >>MARY MULHERN: We are going to go an extra ten minutes.
12:21:36 >>MARTIN SHELBY: What time will you then recess?
12:21:38 >>MARY MULHERN: We will recess at 12:340 ho and be back at
12:21:42 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Can I ask Mr. Nuckles a question,
12:21:49 Thanks for being here.
12:21:54 So in the presentation, there was a reference to be a couple
12:21:57 of meetings that had taken place with the homeless
12:22:04 As a representative of the homeless coalition can you please
12:22:07 give me your summary of those meetings and your assistance
12:22:10 and how the homeless coalition -- this is part of the
12:22:13 ten-year plan.
12:22:14 So how does this fit into the plan, and what are the steps
12:22:17 being taken to move this forward?
12:22:19 >> Well, a one-stop center has been a part of the ten-year
12:22:23 plan since inception in 2002 when Mayor Greco asked us to
12:22:29 put that together.
12:22:30 And so be this process, Dr. Wilson did meet with the
12:22:37 coalition in August and September, at our coalition
12:22:41 We had a group of CEOs from several of our providers that
12:22:46 met separately to come up with some things that they kind of
12:22:51 agreed on, and he outlined all of those that we agreed upon
12:22:56 during his presentation.
12:23:01 >> Was there any hesitation?
12:23:03 Because I would like to hear, you know, if we are going to
12:23:06 embark on this process, I want to gone into it knowing all
12:23:09 of the things we might come across and be hit with.
12:23:15 So is there any concern?
12:23:17 I know again with Pinellas safe harbor there were a lot of
12:23:20 concerns in the beginning.
12:23:21 So I want to vet those now.
12:23:23 >> Absolutely, absolutely.
12:23:26 Dr. Wilson, when he made his first presentation to the
12:23:30 membership, there was probably 100 of our members there in
12:23:34 attendance that day.
12:23:35 We spent over an hour, probably discussing that specific
12:23:44 Of a loud member feedback.
12:23:45 Some of the concerns consisted with things which Mary Lynn
12:23:51 had just discussed about the process of not having enough
12:23:54 funding for additional case managers.
12:23:56 So that was a very large concern, that opening a facility,
12:24:03 we can't expect that our local nonprofits who are already
12:24:08 delivering service can have case managers go there without
12:24:11 additional funding to do that.
12:24:14 Because we are at capacity already in the community.
12:24:17 That was a major concern.
12:24:19 Another concern was just the fact that with Pinellas County
12:24:27 government actually operating the center, not necessarily
12:24:31 understanding the full funding within the process and saying
12:24:39 that 1.2 million may be able to do that for this community,
12:24:43 it may not work it may cost us more in Hillsborough.
12:24:50 And in other communities like Miami-Dade and Broward County,
12:24:55 it is very similar to what Councilwoman Capin had suggested,
12:25:01 that city government actually owns the property.
12:25:04 They lease to the a nonprofit for a year, and that's a
12:25:08 dollar a year.
12:25:10 So there is definitely different types of opportunities for
12:25:17 As a coalition we stand ready to assist in any way that we
12:25:20 possibly can.
12:25:21 And I think, if I am not mistaken, those were the specific
12:25:24 issues that were raised.
12:25:26 >>LISA MONTELIONE: And the Homeless Coalition has taken
12:25:32 lead and you will be the lead agency should we go forward
12:25:34 with some recommendation today?
12:25:39 >>RAYME NUCKLES: If you make a recommendation the coalition
12:25:41 will take the lead with regard to the collaboration
12:25:44 We'll look for a partner who will then manage the facility
12:25:48 and operations of the program.
12:25:50 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Thank you very much.
12:25:52 That's all the questions I have.
12:26:01 >>YVONNE CAPIN: (off microphone)
12:26:04 We are one year away from that ten year.
12:26:06 How close are we to a facility, a one-stop?
12:26:11 >> We are not any closer than we were when we developed the
12:26:14 plan in 2002.
12:26:16 >> So we can start from a new ten years, right?
12:26:22 We can start.
12:26:24 Thank you.
12:26:24 >>MARY MULHERN: (off microphone).
12:26:34 >> You're welcome, thank you.
12:26:46 >>MARY MULHERN: ... with the sheriff.
12:27:04 The mayor has their proposal, their original proposal.
12:27:07 They have met, I'm sure, with all of us.
12:27:12 And really, from my understanding, got -- and from what Mr.
12:27:18 Nuckles just said, unanimous support for this concept.
12:27:25 So the things that we are talking about today, it boils down
12:27:29 to very simply what Mrs. Kemp said and what pretty much
12:27:35 everybody said.
12:27:36 We need beds.
12:27:38 We need a site.
12:27:39 We need 24 hours.
12:27:41 We need triage or one-stop shop where people who are taken
12:27:50 to be this facility, should we find a way to make it happen,
12:27:55 have somewhere to sleep, to eat, and to get steered into the
12:28:03 services that are out there.
12:28:04 So I can tell you from having talked to the sheriff, they
12:28:12 are 100 percent behind this and want to work with us.
12:28:19 Dr. Wilson did mention that he also met with Tampa Police
12:28:22 Department, and they are 100 percent behind this.
12:28:26 This council asks all of them to have do this, and we are
12:28:32 behind it.
12:28:33 And the mayor, I spoke with the mayor yesterday, and the
12:28:39 mayor is going -- has agreed to help us find a site, to
12:28:48 speak with the sheriff, to speak with the county commission,
12:28:55 which I think we will also do, I'm sure, if we take some
12:29:44 Isn't this what Mrs. Capin suggested, private sector, that
12:29:47 we find staff, and whether there's a building there or not.
12:29:56 We all know that's what we need, and we all have to be able
12:29:59 to work together.
12:30:01 So I do have to be say we have been talking about this
12:30:12 problem, first in the context of solicitation and the
12:30:14 pressure for council to do something about it.
12:30:16 Then in the context of our wanting to address the disease
12:30:22 and not just the symptom.
12:30:24 We have been talking about it for a year.
12:30:26 And I know that I have offered to work on this with the
12:30:35 county commission, and maybe someone will formalize that are
12:30:39 we need the county commission to work with us, because they
12:30:44 have their sources of funding, and they have more of a
12:30:50 One other thing I really wanted to say because I think this
12:30:53 has come up as a concern.
12:30:55 We need this to happen.
12:30:57 It has to happen through a coalition.
12:31:02 The homeless coalition, the perfect person to be try to
12:31:08 perhaps at least work on the development of the project and
12:31:15 the funding.
12:31:16 Who end up administering the site is a question of where the
12:31:20 site end up.
12:31:22 And there are providers that may even have space that we
12:31:29 don't know about.
12:31:30 So that's all in the future.
12:31:31 But I do not believe -- and I want to a sure he special
12:31:35 reply the mayor of this, that we are not asking to create a
12:31:38 new department, a new bureaucracy, a new service agency
12:31:42 within the city.
12:31:43 We are asking for the city to help with finding a site,
12:31:50 fund-raising, and with all of our grant opportunities.
12:31:56 And that's the other thing I want to say.
12:31:58 Then I think Councilman.
12:32:00 >>HARRY COHEN, did you change your mind?
12:32:02 >>HARRY COHEN: Yes, briefly.
12:32:03 >>MARY MULHERN: So this mayor and I think we heard today
12:32:10 from Councilwoman Montelione, or someone mentioned to you,
12:32:13 but we need to be applying for and have a better process for
12:32:17 getting federal grants in this city.
12:32:20 And I think the mayor has told me he's committed to that,
12:32:24 and I think council is.
12:32:25 So we don't even know what's out there at this point as far
12:32:28 as what our resources could be, to contribute to funding.
12:32:36 Councilman Cohen.
12:32:36 >>HARRY COHEN: Thank you.
12:32:37 I just want to very briefly add to what Councilwoman Mulhern
12:32:41 just said in relationship to 2001 specific items.
12:32:45 The first is the county commission.
12:32:49 I have been contacted by commissioner Murman, who assures me
12:32:53 that there is a real desire to do something about this on a
12:32:58 countywide basis, and that they want to work with us to try
12:33:00 to find a joint solution.
12:33:02 I believe that the county administrator has been contacted
12:33:07 about this, and that there is going to be a joint effort to
12:33:11 look for some facilities.
12:33:12 I also want to mention that candy Olson from the school
12:33:16 board was here earlier, and she and I had some discussions
12:33:19 as we have been moving through some of these issues, and I
12:33:22 think it's very important to remember that the school board
12:33:25 can be an excellent partner with all of us, especially when
12:33:30 it comes to looking for facilities.
12:33:32 Because they, of course, have more facilities and more staff
12:33:36 than anybody in Hillsborough County.
12:33:40 So I think that those are two particular entities that we
12:33:44 can count on to work with us as we move forward.
12:33:47 One of the themes of this workshop today has been the desire
12:33:52 that we address the underlying problem and not just the
12:33:57 symptoms of the problem.
12:33:58 And I know from listening to whatever everyone has said up
12:34:02 here and listening to everyone's statements over the course
12:34:04 of the last few months that if we can get beyond some of the
12:34:07 discussions about the symptoms, we are all very committed to
12:34:11 using our time, resources and energy to work as much as we
12:34:15 possibly can on the underlying problem of homelessness and
12:34:19 poverty in this community, because we have all seen that
12:34:22 it's getting worse, and that it's becoming an acute crisis
12:34:29 on our streets and in our community.
12:34:30 >>MARY MULHERN: Councilwoman Capin.
12:34:36 And I think after that if we are going to take any action if
12:34:39 you are ready to make a motion.
12:34:41 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I would like to make it formal, get the ball
12:34:44 rolling with the City of Tampa as the leaders that we are,
12:34:47 and the strong and decent community that we are.
12:34:53 So what I would like to propose a motion that we look at
12:35:02 properties that the city owns to be begin with.
12:35:10 And hopefully that there will be something there, also with
12:35:15 keeping 30th street in mind.
12:35:18 But that's the motion I would like to make is for us to
12:35:22 recommend to the administration to please look at properties
12:35:28 that the city does own, that is something that we already
12:35:33 have, it will not be an added expense, which none of us is
12:35:39 looking for.
12:35:39 >>MARY MULHERN: When would you like them to bring that
12:35:45 Staff report?
12:35:49 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Two weeks is the 22nd.
12:35:55 I don't have -- I'm sorry.
12:35:58 Tell me what we have.
12:36:02 Here it is.
12:36:09 >>MARY MULHERN: The regular session?
12:36:11 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Regular session, September 22nd, staff
12:36:14 >>MARY MULHERN: Is that a second?
12:36:16 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Yes, I'll second it.
12:36:18 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor?
12:36:20 Any opposed?
12:36:23 Any other -- I just want to say one thing that I forgot to
12:36:30 say, and Councilwoman Capin reminded me of it.
12:36:34 I just want to quote our former chair, Councilman Reverend
12:36:40 Scott, when we first started talking about this.
12:36:45 He said, you don't want to be see wanna government without
12:36:51 compassion can do.
12:36:53 And that was one of the most eloquent things I've heard.
12:36:56 And I've trade to keep that in mind P.you don't want to know
12:37:01 if your government does not have compassion what it would be
12:37:07 And thank you so much to the group, to Jason Wilson, and
12:37:12 Narria and pat and to be Morris and to Rayme Nuckles and to
12:37:23 all the providers that have been working on this.
12:37:25 Thanks a lot.
12:37:26 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Recess till 1:30?
12:37:33 >>MARY MULHERN: We will recess until 1:30, at which point
12:37:37 we will have our second item on the workshop agenda
12:37:42 regarding the solicitation ordinance.
01:31:40 >>MARY MULHERN: City Council special called workshop.
01:38:39 We are going to open our second item, city staff.
01:38:58 We need to have roll call.
01:38:59 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Here.
01:39:04 >>MARY MULHERN: Here.
01:39:06 >>HARRY COHEN: Here.
01:39:07 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Here.
01:39:07 >>MARY MULHERN: Assistant city attorney Rebecca Kert is
01:39:14 going to provide us with a report.
01:39:18 >>REBECCA KERT: Legal department.
01:39:21 I previously provided you with a memorandum that contains
01:39:24 the ordinances that would effectuate the three options that
01:39:28 City Council has previously discussed regarding solicitation
01:39:34 in the right-of-way and the public safety dangers.
01:39:35 The first option is briefly a ban on street solicitation
01:39:39 with an extension for newspaper sales.
01:39:41 The second option is a six-day ban on street solicitation
01:39:46 where there would be no ban on Sunday based upon some
01:39:48 evidence that was previously submitted that showed overall
01:39:51 lower accident rates on Sunday.
01:39:54 And the third option is a ban on street solicitation with an
01:39:58 exemption for newspaper sales and leafletting.
01:40:06 What it does is prevent a pedestrian from having a
01:40:09 transaction or solicitation with a motor vehicle when that
01:40:11 motor vehicle is within the traveled lane.
01:40:15 The other thing it prohibits is holding a sign if the peaked
01:40:18 is in the roadway, and the roadway is defined as shoulder to
01:40:22 shoulder including the median.
01:40:23 What it does not prohibit is holding a sign along the edge
01:40:26 of the road or any sort of solicitation or leafletting from
01:40:32 pedestrian to pedestrian.
01:40:33 We have reached all of you individually.
01:40:35 I know these are legal issues.
01:40:37 But for the record, solicitation in the right-of-way is
01:40:40 conduct that is protected by the first amendment.
01:40:45 And uphold the if it's narrowly to be a government interest
01:40:50 such as public safety.
01:40:54 They will look more closely at ordinance ifs they treat one
01:40:58 group differently.
01:40:59 Based upon conversations that City Council previously had
01:41:02 declared that newspapers are at the heart of democracy in
01:41:05 America and have been since this country was founded, the
01:41:09 struggles that newspapers have had over the last decade,
01:41:12 especially local newspapers, has been well documented, and
01:41:16 there is an important purpose in ensuring that they can
01:41:18 continue to be didn't their newspapers and in fact survive.
01:41:23 And doing research on this issue, I have found that in
01:41:26 Florida, Jacksonville has a similar exemption for
01:41:28 newspapers, and looking across the country I have found
01:41:31 other examples of jurisdictions that have banned street
01:41:35 solicitation but that ban did not apply to newspaper sales.
01:41:40 I don't have a case on point directly that either uphold or
01:41:43 has found it unconstitutional.
01:41:45 We will be making new legal arguments if in fact it's the
01:41:49 approach that City Council wants but we do have examples out
01:41:51 there, and will be prepared to defend that.
01:41:55 I do want to point out that none of the options before you
01:41:59 provides for permitting.
01:42:00 And as we previously told you, the way that the state law is
01:42:03 currently written, local governments cannot have a
01:42:06 permitting system, so state law needs to change before we
01:42:09 can take that approach.
01:42:10 You have previously had a great deal of testimony on this
01:42:15 And you will hear more from the public today.
01:42:18 But if City Council chooses to move forward with one of
01:42:20 these options, we will have additional testimony from your
01:42:24 staff at the second reading which is, in fact, the public
01:42:28 And I'm available if there are any questions.
01:42:29 >>FRANK REDDICK: Could I ask one question?
01:42:33 I apologize.
01:42:34 I left my folder.
01:42:37 Would you just repeat the one, two, three options?
01:42:41 >> Yes.
01:42:42 Option 1 is a ban on street solicitation with an exemption
01:42:45 for newspaper sales.
01:42:46 Option 2 is a six-day ban an street solicitation with no ban
01:42:52 on Sunday.
01:42:53 And the third option is a ban on street solicitation with an
01:42:56 exemption for newspaper sales and leafletting.
01:42:59 >>FRANK REDDICK: Okay.
01:43:05 >>MARY MULHERN: Were there are other questions for legal at
01:43:10 this time?
01:43:16 Councilman cab peen?
01:43:28 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Some of these options -- I have been reading
01:43:32 these options very, very closely, and on -- I have it
01:43:39 Option 2 and 3.
01:43:57 Under 2 and 3, on section 2 of the first one, ordinance
01:44:04 2011, gosh, I'm sorry to keep you.
01:44:16 >>MARY MULHERN: We could hear from the public.
01:44:19 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I need to get these in order.
01:44:21 >>MARY MULHERN: Could we have a motion to open the public
01:44:24 >> So moved.
01:44:26 >>MARY MULHERN: Okay.
01:44:27 Anyone who wishes tore speak on the ordinance, now is the
01:44:29 opportunity, please come forward and speak.
01:44:34 It would help if you would stand in line or at least stand
01:44:37 up so we have an idea of how many people need to speak.
01:44:42 >> My name is Sharon dragnet.
01:44:50 I came to Tampa when I was about six years old.
01:44:53 And I have made it my home ever since.
01:44:57 I have matriculated through the Tampa schools, and through
01:45:01 Florida State University, and the University of Tampa.
01:45:11 I met and married my husband, a Tampa police supervisor, and
01:45:16 Hillsborough three beautiful children, all of whom have made
01:45:19 law enforcement their careers.
01:45:23 We have encountered many of the homeless with gaunt
01:45:28 expressions and sad eyes, the American vet, sporting caps of
01:45:35 their service, and many of their disabilities, an artificial
01:45:42 leg, a brace, a cane, and some that are simply down on their
01:45:47 luck enduring the cruelties of time that can and often
01:45:54 does -- time often offers.
01:45:58 Some are looking for work, anything, anything that are may
01:46:03 bring food to their children.
01:46:05 Some are just plain hurting.
01:46:10 Some are hot and sick from the scorching heat.
01:46:17 Some are soaked to the bones from heavy rain.
01:46:20 And some don't even know where they might lay a weary head
01:46:25 while they contemplate the uncertainties of tomorrow.
01:46:28 I have never, never experienced anything less than a sincere
01:46:37 smile or a grateful thank you and a friendly "God bless."
01:46:43 These precious people are hurting, sincerely reaching out
01:46:48 for a helping hand, for a break, even a small as it might
01:46:55 It seems that our upper echelon wants to look down their
01:47:02 noses at these people.
01:47:03 Our politicos and city fathers are willing to sweep them
01:47:07 under the rug and wish that they would simply disappear, all
01:47:14 the while sporting a toothy grin and slapping the good ol'
01:47:20 boys on the back.
01:47:22 (Bell sounds)
01:47:22 I once saw a single mom on the street corn with two small
01:47:26 children playing next to her while she had a canister of
01:47:30 cold water and trying to sell it to motorists who only
01:47:34 stopped long enough to read her sign and then zip on home
01:47:37 for a hot dinner.
01:47:40 If Tampa is truly trying to put a good foot forward for the
01:47:46 National Republican Convention it would be more beneficial
01:47:48 to exhibit a city who extended a helping hand, a Christian
01:47:52 friendship to those in need.
01:47:53 (Bell sounds)
01:47:59 Won't be as obvious as the paint can with the broad stroke
01:48:02 of invisible paint and they don't exist.
01:48:05 I have lost my city and its people, but lately it smacks of
01:48:09 a sour taste and a sharp sting in the heart.
01:48:13 Thank you.
01:48:13 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
01:48:17 >> Good afternoon, City Council.
01:48:24 My name is Marlin Anderson.
01:48:27 I am the director and immediate past president of Sunset
01:48:31 Park area homeowners association.
01:48:33 I'm here to talk about the panhandling issue.
01:48:36 I do want to commend and thank all of you for your
01:48:39 demonstrated compassion and concern towards what to do with
01:48:43 the homeless here in Tampa.
01:48:46 But I do see that we are looking at passing some sort of a
01:48:49 ban on street solicitation, and I'm here to address that.
01:48:58 First of all in, January 2011, our association, the
01:49:01 membership, we had a quorum, we voted unanimously to be
01:49:05 support a St. Pete style across the board ban on all forms
01:49:09 of solicitation, so that would be include nobody can go out
01:49:13 on the street and sell stuff.
01:49:16 Or ask for stuff.
01:49:18 And I have seen -- I have been following the news, and this
01:49:25 group is going to sue if you do this and this other group is
01:49:27 going to sue if you do that, you know, and there's all these
01:49:30 things we are trying to do to try to accommodate these
01:49:33 different groups, but I think that when you look at this
01:49:37 whole thing, when they did this in St. Pete, it's not
01:49:41 singling out a group, and giving preference treatment to one
01:49:46 particular group.
01:49:47 It's just saying no solicitation on the roadways or medians.
01:49:51 And that's really what I think we need to do.
01:49:54 It's something which the ordinance, in the course before 15
01:50:01 months now, is still there, it's probably going to stay
01:50:03 The reason why I think it's going to stay there also is
01:50:06 because it's done on a safety issue.
01:50:09 And I can tell you right now, just from my own personal
01:50:12 experience, I almost ran over a panhandler.
01:50:15 He was running across Westshore Boulevard against the light.
01:50:20 I had to slam on my brakes to miss the guy.
01:50:22 I didn't hit the guy.
01:50:23 But this will give you kind of an example that there is a
01:50:26 safety issue there.
01:50:29 So once again, I would just like to say that I don't think
01:50:32 that all these medians, we have city planners and our city
01:50:38 fathers, that they contemplate that we have every day people
01:50:40 on the streets soliciting.
01:50:42 And I don't think we should do that.
01:50:44 And, therefore, I ask that you do what St. Pete did and pass
01:50:50 an across-the-board ban on street solicitation in the
01:50:53 medians and the roadways.
01:50:55 Thank you.
01:50:55 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
01:50:57 >> Good afternoon.
01:51:12 My name is Ed curlin.
01:51:16 I live in Virginia park, which its leaders voted to -- or
01:51:26 are in support of a total ban.
01:51:27 But I want to ask you a few questions about this, because
01:51:31 first of all neither one of these neighborhoods, you want to
01:51:35 ask yourself what the motivation is.
01:51:37 Another one is, what's it actually prohibiting?
01:51:40 For those of you who attend church or even speak behind the
01:51:44 pulpit at church, I think you will recognize a couple of
01:51:46 these verses here.
01:51:47 Luke Chapter 11 verse 41 says give alms such things you
01:51:52 have, all things to you, versus 33 and 34, give ALMS, there
01:52:02 where your treasurer is there your heart will be also.
01:52:05 So where is your heart on this?
01:52:06 Is your heart with those who need assistance?
01:52:12 Or will you pretend that this really is a safety issue and
01:52:15 hide behind that, tossing people out?
01:52:21 This practice that you refer to as panhandling has been
01:52:23 known throughout the centuries, well before the founding of
01:52:25 this country, well before the founding of this country was
01:52:29 known as giving of alms and asking of alms, and exported by
01:52:36 Mohammed and by Moses.
01:52:38 So we are saying City of Tampa is better than all of these
01:52:41 people who call us to be generous and to give without
01:52:44 judgment directly to people who are asking for it.
01:52:49 The second question is, what will be the effect of the
01:52:52 proposed bans?
01:52:53 Any one of them?
01:52:55 You spend a lot of time and effort focusing on unintended
01:52:58 What about the intended consequences?
01:53:01 What about the folks who you do aim to get rid?
01:53:05 What's going to happen to them?
01:53:06 At least in St. Pete they had the heart to put forward a
01:53:10 comprehensive solution through their shelter program and the
01:53:14 sheriff's office.
01:53:15 At least they did that before kicking people out.
01:53:19 At least there's some kind of cushion to protect them when
01:53:23 you pull out their source of income.
01:53:26 Finally the question to ask is even more swayed by
01:53:28 conservative arguments.
01:53:30 And we are talking about limited government.
01:53:32 Now we are talking about extending government into a willing
01:53:35 financial transaction between givers and receivers.
01:53:40 The concern is either the support to right to bear arms.
01:53:47 How before the right to ask for alms?
01:53:50 Where is the compassion and heart in all of this?
01:53:52 Please take your conservative ideas if you are conservative,
01:53:56 liberal ideas if you are liberal, and don't use this as a
01:53:59 way to pick on people who cannot help themselves.
01:54:02 Please show compassion and develop a comprehensive solution,
01:54:05 not something where we are just kicking people out because
01:54:08 people in my neighborhood and elsewhere feel that it's
01:54:12 unsanitary and complain it is a safety issue.
01:54:16 (Bell sounds)
01:54:17 Also, my daughter wanted to say a few words, too.
01:54:21 >> She can have three minutes.
01:54:25 >> I don't think that you should ban panhandling because
01:54:37 it's not right.
01:54:38 >>MARY MULHERN: Can you tell us your name everybody?
01:54:40 >> Julia.
01:54:41 >>MARY MULHERN: Julie.
01:54:45 What's your last name ever?
01:54:47 >> Conan.
01:54:48 >>CHAIRMAN: And what grade are you in?
01:54:51 >> Fourth.
01:54:51 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
01:54:52 >> And this says thank you and glowed bless you.
01:55:25 >>CHAIRMAN: Thank you.
01:55:25 >> My name is Kerry yeah Mel, 2433 Estrella street in Sunset
01:55:32 Park N.sunset Park we are very compassionate.
01:55:35 We care about the homeless people and the people who are
01:55:38 struggling right now.
01:55:40 That's not what this is about.
01:55:41 This is about public safety, it's about quality of life, and
01:55:46 it's about the impression that people coming to our town,
01:55:50 our city, have when they see panhandlers at every street
01:55:55 corner within a one mile radius of my house.
01:55:59 And many others.
01:56:01 I'm here on behalf of my association.
01:56:04 I'm the president of Sunset Park.
01:56:07 The association voted in January, as Marlin said, to ask
01:56:11 City Council for an all-out ban on panhandling.
01:56:16 We discussed this issue at length and all of our members
01:56:20 expressed compassion for the homeless.
01:56:23 That's not what this is about.
01:56:25 Most of the members felt like giving somebody, you know, a
01:56:29 couple of hours out your car window was not the best way to
01:56:35 help people in need.
01:56:38 It's what you talked about earlier.
01:56:40 It's developing a plan, an overall plan.
01:56:42 And I think we need to look at the other ways.
01:56:48 War the panhandlers?
01:56:49 What kind of a negative impact are they having on our city?
01:56:52 So it needs to go both ways.
01:56:55 We want to help them, but I would hope that they would also
01:56:58 look at our point of view.
01:57:00 It is scary sometimes when I drive up to the intersection,
01:57:05 and there's two guys coming up to my car, and I have got my
01:57:08 young children, and you do hear that a lot of the people
01:57:12 that heir out there have been mental health issues, so it
01:57:16 can be scary and intimidating especially at night or if I
01:57:19 have children in my car.
01:57:20 So I do think that there is a public safety component to
01:57:26 Our membership voted unanimously to ask City Council for a
01:57:29 complete ban.
01:57:32 And as I said, our issues were public safety, leaving a
01:57:36 negative impression that people coming to our city had when
01:57:42 they saw the panhandling going on, and it's also a quality
01:57:47 of life issue.
01:57:48 So thank you.
01:57:49 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
01:57:55 Please restrain your comments unless you are at the podium.
01:58:02 >> My temporary address is 4929 East 7th Avenue.
01:58:08 I want to the say to everyone have a blessed day.
01:58:12 I want to be ask this council, how many lawyers did it take
01:58:15 you before you found a shyster that would take a pack of
01:58:20 lies to take away my freedoms because of greediness?
01:58:23 The ones that I was born with and lived by for over half a
01:58:27 century and still believe in today, the ones that my
01:58:31 forefathers gave to have me to use as tools that I need to
01:58:35 pursue the decency of life.
01:58:37 It is my right to pursue my happiness by using my freedoms
01:58:42 of speech and expression as for what I do with my sign on
01:58:48 that corner.
01:58:49 A lying corrupt lawyer has worded a pack of lies to take way
01:58:52 the only means the homeless have to survive as per their
01:58:56 freedom, the beginning of downfall of America, and by giving
01:59:00 it to the rich and special interest groups like the
01:59:03 newspapers, you won't stop giving on the corners.
01:59:06 You will just be giving more.
01:59:08 But not to the people who need it.
01:59:11 To the people who don't need it.
01:59:12 And if you enact this piece of garbage to tan away my
01:59:16 freedoms, you are not a Christian.
01:59:17 America senior still Christian.
01:59:19 And if you are not, you should not be on that panel.
01:59:22 If you pass this pack of lies and do not allow the poor
01:59:26 people to live by the only means that we have for now, you
01:59:29 will be ruined by God.
01:59:31 There is no law that says that you have to be a lawyer to be
01:59:35 in politics.
01:59:36 Even I could be president if I was selected.
01:59:39 Write-in candidate.
01:59:47 I can live on next to nothing and survive.
01:59:50 What could I do with a budget?
01:59:53 I know how to keep books, run computers, pinch pennies, see
01:59:58 the future.
01:59:59 I see St. Pete's future.
02:00:01 Very bleak because of the way they are treating the homeless
02:00:04 and the poor.
02:00:07 Do you want Tampa's future to be bleak too?
02:00:09 What's your definition of bleak?
02:00:11 You keep skirting the underlying cause of homelessness
02:00:15 because of greed.
02:00:19 Rent is too high.
02:00:20 It needs to be lowered, keep a cap on it.
02:00:23 Big business.
02:00:23 Interest rates all need to be lowered and capped.
02:00:26 SSI needs to be raised.
02:00:29 That's how you start getting out of this depression.
02:00:31 And yes, we are in depression.
02:00:34 That market crash, the global market crash.
02:00:37 Can't you see what's going on here?
02:00:42 I challenge Christians to stand up and tell them you are
02:00:44 tired of it, too, elect honest Christians, write them in if
02:00:49 you have to.
02:00:49 Don't let these papers lie to you like they did about me.
02:00:52 I challenge Mr. Trump to come down here and buy up some of
02:00:56 these roach ridden motels that greedy landlords try to pass
02:01:00 off as dwellings and mow them down and rebuild with state of
02:01:04 art infrastructures, decent low rental housing.
02:01:08 That would create jobs.
02:01:08 (Bell sounds)
02:01:11 I'm not done but that's okay.
02:01:12 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
02:01:15 >> hello.
02:01:21 I'm Jacqueline Helfrick on behalf of many friends, relatives
02:01:29 and neighbors, and I just want to state that we are all in
02:01:32 firm agreement that we are for an all-out ban.
02:01:35 The main reason is strictly for safety reasons.
02:01:39 And I'm here to ask how I can help.
02:01:41 So I hope that's a bright spot on your day.
02:01:45 I would be happy to go around and get signatures if that
02:01:47 would help to show that I'm not here alone talking about the
02:01:51 safety issue.
02:01:53 I had several instances.
02:01:55 And I did write to everyone.
02:01:56 Does anyone remember when I wrote to you and copied the
02:02:01 mayor of St. Petersburg?
02:02:02 >>MARY MULHERN: We have gotten a lot of letters.
02:02:06 Don't feel bad.
02:02:08 >> Okay.
02:02:09 Anyhow, I have never received an answer from anyone except
02:02:13 Joseph Caetano.
02:02:14 That was the last time.
02:02:16 The second time I received no answer.
02:02:18 I did get an answer from Mayor Buckhorn and Mayor Iorio.
02:02:22 So I just wondered if you had received it.
02:02:24 Because I had so many close encounters that I had.
02:02:30 It's not my driving.
02:02:31 I have not had any accidents or speeding tickets.
02:02:34 It's just simply a matter of they scare me to no end.
02:02:38 I can't go out on any given day without having heart
02:02:43 palpitations, and that's not my old age either.
02:02:46 It's just yesterday, I had a man to come out, get to the
02:02:51 left turn lane on Gandy going to Westshore, came out and he
02:02:55 stood with two lanes going straight.
02:02:57 They are going and he's standing there weaving back and
02:03:01 I couldn't move.
02:03:02 I couldn't go up to get in my lane to turn because I was
02:03:05 afraid I would hit him.
02:03:07 I had one come up behind me at the gas station to ask me for
02:03:10 $40 for a hotel room.
02:03:13 And I had my hand on the gas nozzle and almost turned around
02:03:17 and shouted at him because he caught me so offguard.
02:03:21 We have been here since 1970.
02:03:23 I don't want to feel that I can't go out on our streets and
02:03:26 be safe anymore.
02:03:27 But this one yesterday was probably the worst.
02:03:31 But I have talked to many, many people, and they feel the
02:03:33 same way I do, that it's really a safety issue more than
02:03:38 And in my regular job I do interviews and surveys.
02:03:41 I would be happy to do it pro bono, anything at all I can to
02:03:45 help you, and I'm so glad to hear that we are talking about
02:03:49 a possible solution.
02:03:50 So does anyone have been a question for me?
02:03:53 (Bell sounds)
02:03:55 I was right on the minute.
02:03:56 That's good for me.
02:03:57 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
02:03:59 >> Susan Long, 920 broad street.
02:04:08 This is I heard from several people this is not a safety
02:04:12 I emailed each of you last night.
02:04:24 This is a motorcycle deputy hit by a driver hit by a
02:04:48 panhandler in the middle of the intersection.
02:04:53 Happened to be a sheriff's office on a motorcycle, when he
02:04:56 went through the intersection, he paused, told the person to
02:05:00 get out of the intersection.
02:05:02 Somebody behind him or next to him didn't realize he was
02:05:05 stopping, knocked him over, ended up in the hospital.
02:05:08 He was released the same day.
02:05:09 We were lucky.
02:05:10 I'm not sure that any panhandler is more valuable than any
02:05:13 of our police officers.
02:05:15 I would like to see them all safe.
02:05:19 I do believe, however, the idea put forth this morning is an
02:05:25 excellent idea.
02:05:26 We need a comprehensive plan to deal with those people who
02:05:28 are financially, mentally and physically unable to take care
02:05:32 of themselves.
02:05:33 I think that's a wonderful idea.
02:05:35 I also know it isn't going to happen in the next week, as do
02:05:40 We give $3 million proposed for this next year to the Tampa
02:05:43 Sports Authority, and we have no comprehensive way to take
02:05:47 care of the needy?
02:05:50 We are spending over $100,000 a month is my understanding to
02:05:54 keep an empty building called the federal courthouse, and we
02:05:59 can't take care of the needy?
02:06:01 Where are our priorities?
02:06:02 We need to take our money and spend it on the people that
02:06:06 need the help, and at the same time prevent panhandling so
02:06:11 that not only am I not afraid to walk down the street, am I
02:06:16 not worried to have somebody step in front of my car, or put
02:06:21 a hand in front of my face at a stop sign, that these people
02:06:25 aren't going to be run over or killed.
02:06:27 The other thing I want to say is the RNC is coming next
02:06:31 I know what's going to happen if we don't clean this up.
02:06:34 I live in Seminole Heights.
02:06:35 It happens every time.
02:06:36 We push all the things that you don't want the outsiders to
02:06:39 see into my neighborhood, because I live on a major road in
02:06:42 the middle of the northern half of the City of Tampa.
02:06:46 Please clean it up so I don't have be to be deal with that
02:06:48 Thank you.
02:06:48 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
02:06:52 >> Good afternoon.
02:06:59 Jim lake, 4218 west San Pedro.
02:07:02 I'm also a lawyer for "The Tampa Tribune.
02:07:04 And I want to thank you all for the time and consideration
02:07:06 you have given to this issue and to the city attorney's R's
02:07:11 office for all the time and effort that's gone into the
02:07:14 various proposals that are before you today.
02:07:16 If council's decision today is to move forward, I would like
02:07:21 to suggest that a combination.
02:07:22 Ideas that have been tried in other jurisdictions is the
02:07:25 best approach.
02:07:27 Taking ideas from Pasco County and Jacksonville.
02:07:30 Specifically, I urge you to consider options 2 and 3 that
02:07:36 the city attorney has proposed.
02:07:40 Those in my view take what's best from these other
02:07:44 jurisdictions, the experiences they have had and have found
02:07:46 effective, that combination will address genuine safety
02:07:50 concerns you have heard about, but without unduly burdening
02:07:53 activity that's not been shown to present a problem.
02:07:56 In other words, as the courts would say, I think a
02:07:59 combination of options 2 and 3 would be what the courts call
02:08:02 narrowly tailored to address the concerns.
02:08:05 The first option 2 aspect that I focus on is the Sunday
02:08:11 exception that as we heard comes from Pasco County.
02:08:15 It's supported by Florida Department of Transportation,
02:08:18 traffic, and crash statistics that I have cited to council
02:08:23 I will hand the clerk the copy of those statistics so they
02:08:26 will be in the record for this meeting but it's the same
02:08:28 information that you have seen previously.
02:08:30 The Sunday exception that Pasco enacted also offers the
02:08:34 benefit of accommodating charitable organizations.
02:08:37 Again, on days when traffic crash statistics, roadway
02:08:42 counts, show that there's not a real danger here.
02:08:45 The newspaper exception that you have also heard about is
02:08:48 supported by Jacksonville's ordinance and by Tampa's
02:08:51 We have heard this morning folks recount wag they perceived
02:08:56 as problems with panhandlers, dangerous conditions, but
02:09:00 nothing, we heard nothing about charitable solicitors, we
02:09:03 heard nothing about newspaper vendors.
02:09:05 The final aspect I point out, option 3 that I think is
02:09:09 important to note is that would leave be activity when this
02:09:16 issue was last brought up.
02:09:18 I would say with a combination of those three avenues from
02:09:21 other jurisdictions, Pasco, and Jacksonville, you can solve
02:09:25 the panhandling problems that you have heard about without
02:09:31 interfering with these other legitimate activities that
02:09:33 haven't been shown to be a danger.
02:09:35 (Bell sounds)
02:09:36 And insofar as -- is there a way to measure public opinion
02:09:41 on this?
02:09:41 Well, one that I would throb out for council's consideration
02:09:44 is that 15,000 copies of "The Tampa Tribune" are sold every
02:09:47 Sunday this way.
02:09:48 That's 15,000 people at least who don't seem to have much of
02:09:52 a problem with this activity.
02:09:55 So we urge council to combine options 2 and 3.
02:09:58 Thank you very much.
02:09:58 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
02:10:01 >> hello.
02:10:07 I am Diana with the muscular dystrophy association.
02:10:11 My home address is 502 south Fremont.
02:10:14 >>MARY MULHERN: Can you give us your full name?
02:10:17 >> Diana MMacLean.
02:10:19 I reiterate some of the statements that were just said
02:10:23 I think if these are the options that are set before us,
02:10:27 option 2 would be one of the greatest options for my
02:10:32 charitable organization, the muscular dystrophy association,
02:10:39 had a partnership for over 54 years, over 35 in Tampa.
02:10:42 They have raised over $50,000 for the muscular dystrophy
02:10:45 association which goes right back into the community with
02:10:50 research grants at USF for ALS, community research grant,
02:10:54 our clinic at St. Joseph, and our camp here in Brandon.
02:10:59 Without that money, we would not be able to do what we do.
02:11:03 A lot of people have expressed safety concerns.
02:11:05 The firefighters are trained safety professionals.
02:11:09 Since they have been doing this fill the boot drive, there
02:11:12 has never been an incident with a firefighter being injured,
02:11:15 and to my knowledge no accidents.
02:11:21 With a full ban we wouldn't be able to be on the streets.
02:11:27 A partial ban for charities would be ideal for us to
02:11:29 continue doing what we do for the community and the families
02:11:32 that we serve.
02:11:33 I also want to say that Jacksonville's ordinance does have a
02:11:38 permitting process for nonprofits.
02:11:40 In section 804.806, and so that would be obviously an ideal
02:11:49 A six day ban would allow us to still be on the streets on
02:11:53 Sunday if those are the options that are set forth.
02:11:56 We would obviously find to be an ideal solution.
02:11:59 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
02:12:00 >> Good afternoon.
02:12:08 My name is Matt McLaughlin, live at 4301 South Tampa.
02:12:16 Tampa is the city of my choice as I retired from the United
02:12:19 States Army.
02:12:19 When I arrived in Tampa, there were no panhandlers on the
02:12:23 However, in the last five years, there has been a magnitude
02:12:27 of people panhandling on the street.
02:12:31 As far as public donations go, there are other locations and
02:12:34 other places where people can gain money.
02:12:37 I haven't seen anybody at the football games or the baseball
02:12:40 games seeking money.
02:12:42 I haven't seen anybody at public runs.
02:12:45 I haven't seen anybody at the Gasparilla functions
02:12:49 soliciting money.
02:12:51 I contribute to my churn every Sunday that I go.
02:12:53 I contribute to the Metropolitan Ministries.
02:12:57 I do not feel that it's my place to have to give money to
02:13:00 people who have do not have jobs because they are too lazy.
02:13:03 There's an organization out there, in DDU, fatigues,
02:13:11 veterans helping veterans. Stop them.
02:13:14 Ask there are them for their DD 14.
02:13:16 I have done this afternoon to eight people seven of which
02:13:19 were dishonorably discharged with the United States
02:13:23 People who claim to be vets, not necessarily so.
02:13:26 People who have artificial limbs did not necessarily get
02:13:28 them as a result of military service.
02:13:30 They got them after military service and they are playing on
02:13:33 your heart strings as veterans dishonorably discharged.
02:13:38 I want the police to do their job and stop the people from
02:13:42 walking in the lane of traffic soliciting money.
02:13:47 If it's so important for the newspapers to be able to sell
02:13:49 on Sunday, why aren't they out there selling every day of
02:13:52 the week? Web I was growing up many of you saw young men
02:13:57 standing on the corner selling newspapers on the way home
02:13:59 and in the morning.
02:13:59 Why aren't they doing that every day?
02:14:02 They moved to automatic teller so they don't have to pay
02:14:05 people to be do that.
02:14:07 Do the newspapers pay these people to sell the newspapers?
02:14:10 I doubt it.
02:14:10 I don't think they receive benefits.
02:14:12 I don't think they receive any insurance.
02:14:14 I'm not sure how much money they get for it.
02:14:17 I believe a total ban is the only way to solve this problem.
02:14:21 And I respectfully request you all do that.
02:14:23 Thank you.
02:14:23 Good afternoon.
02:14:24 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
02:14:25 >> My name is Aaron Clamella.
02:14:36 And being here today I am reminded how divisive an issue
02:14:41 panhandling is.
02:14:42 People are passionate and we need to understand we may not
02:14:45 understand all the hardships we are understood.
02:14:46 But receipts remember dab this is about soliciting and
02:14:50 What we are seeing in other jurisdictions that do this is
02:14:53 there are unintended consequences of what these laws can do.
02:14:56 Organizations like mine and others, history of America from
02:15:02 the revolutionary to the tea party have gotten their
02:15:05 information out by public leafletting and public
02:15:09 Other options put forward, option 3 is the only one than
02:15:13 looks like it will still allow for that to be available here
02:15:15 in the City of Tampa.
02:15:17 And I want to encourage you to further look into that.
02:15:20 Thank you.
02:15:20 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
02:15:21 >> Good afternoon.
02:15:27 Thank you for taking up.
02:15:28 My name is Ann Kulig. I'm here on behalf of Westshore
02:15:33 Alliance, now with 300 member companies in the Westshore
02:15:37 business district.
02:15:38 And we have been on the record on this a number of times,
02:15:41 but we honestly believe this is a serious public safety
02:15:46 None of the proposals before you are asking you to ban
02:15:50 They are asking you to ban panhandling and solicitation in
02:15:55 roadways, designed for cars, unfortunately.
02:15:58 Many of the major roads that run through the Westshore
02:16:01 district are state roads.
02:16:03 You are talking six to ten lanes of traffic at major, major
02:16:08 intersections that see thousands and thousands of cars a
02:16:12 We really think it is a public safety issue to have people
02:16:15 walking through lanes of traffic.
02:16:17 I know there are rules set forth in your current ordinance,
02:16:20 but they are not supposed to be in the lanes of traffic
02:16:23 while the light is green, but it happens all the time, and
02:16:26 you don't have enough police officers in the City of Tampa
02:16:28 to enforce that.
02:16:31 Our board voted earlier this spring, the original proposal
02:16:35 that I believe you saw in January or February, to go to an
02:16:39 outright ban on all activities and solicitation.
02:16:42 We understand there may need to be a compromise position
02:16:46 here, but we just ask you to do something.
02:16:51 We have been coming before you for two years on this issue,
02:16:55 and we ask you to please act and do something.
02:16:57 It is a serious public safety issue.
02:16:59 Thank you.
02:16:59 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
02:17:06 >> City Council, I know I have talked to you meantimes,
02:17:12 members of the City Council.
02:17:13 I'm Peggy Rand, 6115 schooner way.
02:17:18 I definitely would not be for option 1 as I have expressed
02:17:24 so often.
02:17:24 Option 2 or 3 would be certainly, I think, be what most
02:17:32 people -- I talked to many that wouldn't come down, but
02:17:36 people that I have known for years that have compassion in
02:17:40 this community.
02:17:43 I personally feel that it's not a safety issue as much as an
02:17:49 image issue.
02:17:50 And that has been brought out.
02:17:54 I think to ban newspaper sales would be a terrible thing.
02:18:02 I'm one that is not too good with the computer.
02:18:06 I like to get up at 5:00 in the morning.
02:18:08 I read both newspapers.
02:18:11 The people who earn their living by selling newspapers and a
02:18:19 good portion of their income, I think need to keep those
02:18:22 I want to thank the City Council for taking their time and
02:18:26 not pushing this through as some of us saw you might do
02:18:33 earlier on.
02:18:33 I was almost convinced that at the last meeting there would
02:18:37 be a vote, and I was so happy to see that you have
02:18:43 considered this not only as a panhandling problem but as a
02:18:48 homeless problem.
02:18:50 And there are many of us who would like to do something to
02:18:54 resolve the homeless problem.
02:18:56 We have a plan now, hopefully, that all of us will get
02:19:01 onboard with, and that will alleviate a lot of the problems.
02:19:05 But I only say to you, I want you to continue to show your
02:19:09 compassion and your feeling for the community, as everyone I
02:19:15 have talked to on the council has done.
02:19:16 Thank you.
02:19:17 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
02:19:18 >> My name is Carol Cameron.
02:19:23 I live at 3316 north San Miguel.
02:19:26 First, I want to be applaud you for what you did at the
02:19:28 workshop you had this morning and looking for alternatives
02:19:31 to try to help with the homeless.
02:19:34 I think that's what we need to do.
02:19:36 But 324 beds, even though that's a start, doesn't help with
02:19:40 the 17,000 people problem that we have in the city but it's
02:19:46 a start and something we need to do.
02:19:48 However, when we talk against the panhandling, it's not that
02:19:51 we are against the people having an opportunity if they need
02:19:54 to try to go out and get money.
02:19:55 It's just doing it in the right-of-way.
02:19:57 And I think we have to be careful that we have compassion
02:20:00 for the people, but the panhandling, and when people are
02:20:04 standing in the right-of-way -- and I have had them, I have
02:20:07 seen them walk down between the lanes during the light,
02:20:10 which is really dangerous, and try to come up to your
02:20:14 Like the one lady, sometimes I'm a little concerned about
02:20:19 Fortunately my car locks when I put it into gear.
02:20:22 I want to have compassion but I don't want to unable them.
02:20:26 The one gentleman that quoted scripture to you, I'm trying
02:20:30 to think about wherever Jesus came upon beggars, he gave
02:20:34 them their sight, told them how to walk.
02:20:36 So I don't think that's really the issue.
02:20:38 I think the important thing is to be try to be ban the
02:20:43 I'm in support of maybe the six-day ban.
02:20:47 And banning from the right-of-way.
02:20:49 That doesn't stop them from going, and if they need to beg
02:20:52 to go to other places at the one gentleman said.
02:20:55 We have laws in this country, freedom of speech, for
02:20:59 But that does not allow us to yell fire in the middle of a
02:21:03 So you can pass certain laws against certain things without
02:21:06 it getting rid of some of the other rights of the person.
02:21:11 So if you ban the panhandling, that doesn't necessarily ban
02:21:14 their ability to go out and beg for money where it is okay
02:21:18 for them to do it where it's not going to be a safety issue.
02:21:23 One of the things I have heard that some of you have
02:21:25 mentioned is be why aren't there more people here?
02:21:28 Maybe you are thinking there's plenty of people here and you
02:21:30 have gotten lots of e-mails.
02:21:31 But we came thinking this was going to be at 10:00 and now
02:21:35 here it is 2:30, and not all the people are able to come and
02:21:40 do this.
02:21:41 So those few of us who are here and who managed to stay are
02:21:44 giving up our time to try to address this issue.
02:21:50 I think that's all that I had to say.
02:21:52 Thank you.
02:21:53 (Bell sounds).
02:21:54 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
02:21:57 >> My name is Linda Carson.
02:21:59 I'm a tax paying citizen of Hillsborough County.
02:22:02 People are begging on the streets are not distractions.
02:22:06 Be they are reminders to all of us that we have failed.
02:22:09 They are remainders of thousands of our neighbors who lost
02:22:12 their homes because of foreclosure.
02:22:13 They are reminders of large number of people who lost their
02:22:16 And they are reminders that so many of the men, women and
02:22:20 children are hungry and desperate, and reminders that our
02:22:24 government has failed so many.
02:22:25 How could people call panhandling a distraction?
02:22:28 People on their cell phones and text messages are
02:22:31 distractions to me.
02:22:33 Just remember, please, that everyone on the corner, everyone
02:22:37 in their cars, living in the woods and on the streets, and
02:22:40 in tents and in shelters have been a story, and many aren't
02:22:44 much different from our own.
02:22:46 Government social services has been cut drastically, and we
02:22:49 have seen a dramatic decline in donations to our charities
02:22:53 because many of the old donors are now homeless and
02:22:56 unemployed themselves.
02:22:57 To be paraphrase Martin Luther King, our homeless people and
02:23:02 neighbors live on a lonely island of a vast ocean of
02:23:07 economic prosperity.
02:23:08 Our homeless languish on the prairies of American society,
02:23:11 on the corners which for their sakes I hope have the longest
02:23:14 red light. They are exiles in their own land, but who are
02:23:14 we but them? And to people who have the least of the least,
02:23:21 to paraphrase Dr. King again, we have a long, long road
02:23:25 ahead to get to the mountaintop.
02:23:26 I too would prefer to travel this road with no panhandlers,
02:23:32 not because we have jailed them but because we have found
02:23:34 homes and fed, and housing and food for them.
02:23:38 We have sympathy for people who lose their homes to Katrina,
02:23:43 mudslides and floods, so how about people that suffer from
02:23:45 their own permanent storms? We are all born in different
02:23:49 circumstances, but there is never a time when each of us
02:23:52 doesn't need a helping hand in one form or another.
02:23:56 With the government cutbacks and failed economy, the helping
02:23:59 hand often has become from one's self, whether a hand
02:24:05 whether stretched out at a red light or begging on the
02:24:09 One in every 320 housing units received foreclosure notices
02:24:11 in June 2011 in Hillsborough County.
02:24:14 We have 17,755 men, women and children that are homeless in
02:24:20 our county on any one given night.
02:24:22 We have 1,500 emergency beds.
02:24:26 That's how many we had ten years ago, by the way.
02:24:28 (Bell sounds)
02:24:30 We have a long waiting list for subsidized housing.
02:24:32 Many panhandlers are not homeless.
02:24:35 They are people living on the edge, working people who are
02:24:39 struggling not to be added to a 17,775 neighbors who have no
02:24:44 home of their own.
02:24:45 The flood of homeless people trying to survive from one day
02:24:49 to the next by begging for money is the direct result of our
02:24:52 terrible economic climate that we live in.
02:24:55 Now we are preparing to mobilize our overworked police, our
02:24:58 overburdened courts and their crowded jails to ensure the
02:25:02 poor to one of the few ways available for them to survive.
02:25:06 I want the government to use my tax dollars, please, in a
02:25:09 way that doesn't pretend we haven't failed.
02:25:12 I give you my outstretched hand and I am begging you to do
02:25:16 the right thing and not punish people who have no
02:25:19 alternative until we come up with alternatives for them.
02:25:22 Thank you.
02:25:24 By the way, it's really wonderful to have plans to go out of
02:25:31 our own community.
02:25:32 We need civic leaders that we were talking about before,
02:25:36 City Council people, concerned citizens, because we all
02:25:38 care, and we all have to come up with a better solution than
02:25:42 punishing people for being impoverished and desperate.
02:25:46 Thank you.
02:25:46 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
02:25:47 >> Good morning.
02:25:51 Spencer Kass, 1001 North Howard Avenue.
02:25:58 The City of Tampa residents are some of the most generous
02:26:03 people I know.
02:26:04 Just last night this budget passed a budget that took $5
02:26:08 million and gave to the non-not-for-profit organizations.
02:26:12 I'll put it up on the Elmo so everyone is clear.
02:26:16 That's $5 million last night you voted to give to all these
02:26:21 different organizations.
02:26:27 Our people are generous.
02:26:29 Our people care about our citizens.
02:26:30 At the same time people care about public safety.
02:26:33 TPD has come down here and said this is a public safety
02:26:37 Either we believe TPD or we don't believe TPD.
02:26:40 That's your decision.
02:26:41 I happen to believe TPD.
02:26:43 They say it's dangerous to. Think that TPD somehow came up
02:26:46 with some imaginary problem that doesn't exist is beyond me.
02:26:51 We have heard from the Department of Transportation.
02:26:55 They have come here, come to the county.
02:26:57 They have said the roads are not designed for this.
02:26:59 It's a public safety issue.
02:27:01 If you believe D.O.T. or you don't believe D.O.T.
02:27:03 If we don't believe these problems we have a more
02:27:05 fundamental issue in this city.
02:27:07 Nobody is against homelessness.
02:27:08 Nobody is against the newspaper people.
02:27:10 You can take two steps back other than private property and
02:27:14 any of these ordinances stop you from doing what you have as
02:27:16 long as you have the property owner's permission.
02:27:19 Tampa Tribune, "St. Pete Times," can buy all the property
02:27:22 they would like to on Dale Mabry or any of the other major
02:27:24 streets and sale their newspapers.
02:27:26 They can work out arrangements with the private property
02:27:30 As a small business person I can tell you, if I want to sell
02:27:32 my goods that's what you tell me to do.
02:27:35 Then you put me through six months of rezoning hearings.
02:27:37 But that's the way it works in this city.
02:27:39 I understand they don't want to gone through that.
02:27:43 Plus we are generous people.
02:27:44 We are good people.
02:27:45 This isn't about not caring about people.
02:27:47 This is about public safety.
02:27:48 And I encourage you to have TPD come up here, tell you their
02:27:52 view on this.
02:27:53 I will point out there is a fourth option which is we get
02:27:56 rid of the city ordinance altogether and do quarterback the
02:27:59 county does and work this through the county.
02:28:01 I have absolutely in a problem doing that.
02:28:03 My second choice if you have to pick something I guess it
02:28:06 would be the six day ban but if we get sued and we start
02:28:09 spending money on that, I understand council put some
02:28:13 protections and we'll let the protections kick in.
02:28:16 I would like to hear from the newspapers to be pick up the
02:28:20 city legal feelings if ultimate lip that's the decision you
02:28:22 go with because either they believe in this or they don't.
02:28:25 Thank you for your time.
02:28:26 Have a great morning.
02:28:26 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
02:28:30 >> Rayme Nuckles, 2105 North Nebraska, Homeless Coalition.
02:28:42 I thank you once again.
02:28:43 I think this bilks has been one of true diligence.
02:28:48 You are faced with very difficult decisions.
02:28:51 You hear things from neighborhood associations and different
02:28:55 issues from the social service organizations in this
02:28:59 And I know it would be a difficult decision if I was in your
02:29:05 It's one that we as a community are faced with.
02:29:10 I think the issue that we discussed prior with regard to be
02:29:14 the alternatives needs to be in comparison with the
02:29:19 ordinance so that we have something in place, because as I
02:29:23 have already indicated, and many of the service providers
02:29:26 have indicated, there aren't enough case managers in this
02:29:29 community to handle those who are on the streets and doing
02:29:34 effective outreach to get them engaged in the services.
02:29:37 And so those are kind of the specific issues that I know
02:29:43 coalition members shall concerned with, and I know you have
02:29:47 a difficult decision, and you have heard me say this a
02:29:51 number of times.
02:29:52 And I appreciate you taking on this responsibility and
02:29:56 trying to help us as a community.
02:29:59 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
02:30:02 >> Good afternoon.
02:30:12 I'm Wayne McCraney, 3713 west Del Prado in South Tampa.
02:30:17 And as I was mentioning earlier, I have been a resident of
02:30:20 Tampa since 1953, 58 years now, and I have never seen
02:30:26 anything like this before, and I have lived through
02:30:28 hurricanes and a tornado up in north Tampa back in the
02:30:33 If everybody remembers the tornado that came down there.
02:30:36 But I want to echo the sentiments of the lady that was
02:30:42 talking about being intimidated and scared when she
02:30:44 approaches an intersection.
02:30:47 I feel the same way.
02:30:48 I'm a grown man.
02:30:49 And I happen to agree with others when they talk about the
02:30:53 safety issue.
02:30:57 I have seen almost accidents happen because an individual
02:30:59 will step off the median, and a driver has to swerve to
02:31:05 prevent from hitting him or striking him, causing him to
02:31:08 almost drive into another vehicle in the other lane.
02:31:15 I have lived in other major cities.
02:31:16 I can mention Atlanta, Chicago, New York City.
02:31:20 I have been to these places.
02:31:23 And I have never seen anything like it, like I was saying
02:31:29 I think the best thing to do would be to come to some type
02:31:32 of a compromise.
02:31:33 I mean, whether or not it's the six day ban, allowing only
02:31:40 Sunday, or maybe a combination of the three options that
02:31:43 were mentioned earlier.
02:31:48 It's embarrassing to me as a citizen.
02:31:51 And I love my city.
02:31:53 I love Tampa more than anything.
02:31:55 And it's embarrassing for me to have family members visit me
02:31:58 from Chicago or the upper east coast and have been to drive
02:32:02 up to these intersections and have these people stand there
02:32:07 with these pieces of cardboard with letters written with a
02:32:12 marker basically saying, I'm having a bad day, please help
02:32:16 I mean, I'm disabled.
02:32:19 I have been working since I was 14 years old and I'm still
02:32:25 working and I'm disabled.
02:32:30 Let's not confuse homelessness with professional panhandling
02:32:33 or professional begging.
02:32:35 A neighbor of mine told me the other day these guys bring in
02:32:38 an average of $50 up to $100 daily.
02:32:42 $100 a day, that's $36,000 a year.
02:32:45 That's more than what I make.
02:32:47 But I would like to be take everything that's been said by
02:32:52 me and the others that were up here before me into
02:32:55 consideration, and I'm sure you will come to the right
02:32:59 And I appreciate you allowing me to speak.
02:33:02 Thank you.
02:33:02 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
02:33:06 Is there anyone else who wishes Tosh speak?
02:33:14 Councilman Cohen?
02:33:15 >>FRANK REDDICK: Can I have a point of order?
02:33:17 I have a procedure question I want to raise.
02:33:19 >>MARY MULHERN: You have a procedural question to ask our
02:33:29 >>FRANK REDDICK: The procedure question is, what is the
02:33:32 preference with council on major policy issues?
02:33:37 What has been the precedent of having a full council on
02:33:44 major issues?
02:33:46 >>MARTIN SHELBY: I can't speak to if there's a policy.
02:33:48 There's nothing in your rules of procedure.
02:33:50 I will state that your charter requires for action to be
02:33:55 taken requires a vote of four.
02:33:58 That is the legal requirement.
02:34:00 What you are asking really is a policy question.
02:34:04 And I really can't, as a point of order, I can't say that
02:34:11 that has ever been, A, tallied or, B, be printed anywhere.
02:34:23 >>MARY MULHERN: This is a workshop so we don't normally
02:34:27 take action, but we did schedule this as an option.
02:34:31 >> Madam Chair.
02:34:37 >>MARY MULHERN: Are you speaking on this?
02:34:38 >> Yes, I am.
02:34:39 Something that you just said.
02:34:40 I believe our rules say that if it is a workshop we can take
02:34:45 Is that correct, Mr. Shelby?
02:34:48 You say we normally don't.
02:34:49 But in the rules, it is that we do.
02:34:51 >>MARY MULHERN: That's what I just said.
02:34:53 And plus when we scheduled this, we did include in the
02:34:58 motion for this workshop that we would have the option to be
02:35:04 take action at the workshop.
02:35:05 What I was trying to say, we can take action, and we
02:35:12 actually scheduled this item with that possibility in there
02:35:17 and with direction to have the ordinances ready if we should
02:35:19 decide to take action.
02:35:20 >>MIKE SUAREZ: My question then is, a motion as -- I
02:35:29 haven't gone back to look at the motion -- if it is a
02:35:32 workshop, by its very nature we can take action, not an
02:35:36 option, but we do take action, correct?
02:35:39 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Council's rules do state that no official
02:35:45 action on the matter which is the subject of the workshop
02:35:46 shall be taken during or after a workshop unless the public
02:35:50 is afforded the opportunity to comment prior to action.
02:35:54 That condition in this circumstance has been met.
02:35:57 >>MARY MULHERN: Thank you.
02:35:59 Councilman Cohen.
02:36:00 >>HARRY COHEN: Thank you, Madam Chair.
02:36:07 We heard from a lot of speakers this afternoon, and they
02:36:14 were a terrific representation of all the different views
02:36:17 that exist in the community.
02:36:18 There are reasonable, well-meaning people who disagree about
02:36:24 what the proper way to handle this issue is.
02:36:28 And in listening to my fellow council members over the past
02:36:34 few months, it's been clear that all of us have different
02:36:38 views on what the most appropriate way to deal with this
02:36:43 issue is.
02:36:44 I wanted to just make a couple of brief comments prior to
02:36:47 the debate getting started.
02:36:50 Hopefully to try to frame the issue after having done some
02:36:53 pretty exhaustive research and study of the topic over the
02:36:57 past couple of months.
02:36:58 To begin with, I would say that, in my opinion, the
02:37:02 situation on our streets is getting out of control.
02:37:06 It's getting worse.
02:37:08 And it's getting worse, I think, for three primary reasons.
02:37:13 One is that the economic situation is continuing to
02:37:17 The unemployment rate is continuing to go up.
02:37:20 There are not opportunities for people who are being
02:37:24 foreclosed on and being evicted from their home, and this
02:37:29 has created a great strain throughout the community.
02:37:33 Second, this practice of asking for money in the streets has
02:37:38 been banned in virtually every jurisdiction that surrounds
02:37:42 the City of Tampa, and, as a result, there's no question
02:37:47 that people are coming in from those jurisdictions and
02:37:50 availing themselves of our admittedly more compassionate
02:37:56 Third, I think that we can expect that this problem is going
02:38:00 to get worse through the winter as people who are up north
02:38:04 right now and are facing inclimate weather and may make
02:38:10 their way to the Tampa area where they heard that we are one
02:38:13 of the few jurisdictions in Florida that is still allowing
02:38:16 people to solicit for money in the streets.
02:38:20 There are good and reasonable people that can disagree on
02:38:23 what the best solution to this problem is.
02:38:25 We heard it this afternoon from the many people that spoke,
02:38:28 and they offered a lot of different options.
02:38:31 Some on this council -- and I have been listening very
02:38:33 closely to what my fellow council members have said over the
02:38:36 past few months, and I would like to just let the public
02:38:39 know, we are not allowed to talk about this among ourselves.
02:38:42 I'm not allowed to wonder into my colleagues' offices and
02:38:47 talk about.
02:38:48 This so this is our only opportunity to actually talk among
02:38:52 ourselves to try to come to some consensus about what to do.
02:38:56 Now, that said, I have been listening to what everyone up
02:38:59 here has said publicly over this span of the last few
02:39:05 Some would be like a full seven-day ban with no exceptions.
02:39:09 Others want exceptions because they are very concerned about
02:39:13 the effects on newspapers, and the people that sell
02:39:17 Councilman Reddick made, I thought, an extraordinary
02:39:20 statement the last time that we touched on this issue, which
02:39:23 went to the viability of what is the oldest continuously
02:39:28 published African-American newspaper in the State of
02:39:31 We have a newspaper in Tampa that is the only
02:39:36 Italian-Spanish and English-speaking newspaper that I know
02:39:39 of that's printed anywhere in the country.
02:39:42 So we have a lot of competing interests that we are trying
02:39:47 to accommodate as we move through this topic.
02:39:53 Option 3, which involved a three-step vote, which is a
02:39:57 repeal of our existing ordinance, a ban on street
02:40:01 solicitation, and then an exception for newspaper sales, and
02:40:05 political speech.
02:40:08 It's a compromise.
02:40:09 It is not, I believe, the ordinance that any one of us who
02:40:13 are up here would have written had we been in control of
02:40:16 what to do about this problem.
02:40:20 But it's probably the closest thing that I know of that
02:40:26 gives everybody here some accommodation on the concerns they
02:40:30 have raised, but yet at the same time protecting the
02:40:36 integrity of the idea of cleaning up our streets, which,
02:40:42 from my viewpoint, really are out of control.
02:40:45 I have to tell you, I've seen fights break out on corners.
02:40:49 I have seen people very aggressively panhandling, and I have
02:40:55 seen way, way more activity on street corners than can
02:41:00 possibly be accommodated for people to safely move
02:41:03 throughout the intersection.
02:41:04 I know there are some up here that want more.
02:41:06 I know there are some that want less.
02:41:09 I only want to tell everyone, as we move through this
02:41:12 discussion, that I don't think we are going to get anywhere
02:41:15 unless everybody is willing to just give and take a little
02:41:19 bit as we discuss the different options that are in front of
02:41:24 Option 3, while not perfect, accommodates newspaper sales,
02:41:31 and it also accommodates political expression, expression by
02:41:35 people that want to simply express a viewpoint, leafletting,
02:41:40 the kind of expression that is at the very heart of first
02:41:44 amendment communication.
02:41:45 So that's just my opening take on this discussion.
02:41:48 >>MARY MULHERN: Councilwoman Montelione.
02:41:55 >>LISA MONTELIONE: I am going to be go through very rapidly
02:41:58 a lot of the comments that I have been writing down as
02:42:00 people have been speaking.
02:42:02 I have spoken with pastors, and what I have heard from
02:42:06 pastors is they have encouraged me to pass an all-out ban
02:42:11 because the way they feel is that we are rewarding by
02:42:15 allowing street solicitation, we are rewarding people and
02:42:19 letting them collect a wage, and the wage is for begging.
02:42:23 Now, what they propose is that if we have the ban in place,
02:42:28 then the individuals will be driven to seek the services,
02:42:32 because they would no longer be paid this wage.
02:42:35 And I have heard that from several pastors.
02:42:38 So I want to ask how they can help.
02:42:41 How they can help is we heard a wonderful proposal earlier
02:42:45 in the first item of this agenda, and how you can help, make
02:42:49 a donation to the homeless coalition or the organization
02:42:53 Metropolitan Ministries, the organization of your choice,
02:42:55 but we need to raise money.
02:42:56 I have been asking to look at CDBG funds.
02:42:59 I have been asking to look at the budget.
02:43:00 I have been asking to find ways to fund services and
02:43:04 programs, and asking that even before I was on council.
02:43:08 We need to raise money.
02:43:09 And if you want to help, you know put your money where your
02:43:13 mouth is.
02:43:14 You don't want to give to the somebody standing on the
02:43:16 street, give it to a charity.
02:43:17 I want to be see those numbers come up the next time I see
02:43:20 Metropolitan Ministries and everybody published their annual
02:43:22 reports, numbers should be up.
02:43:24 Freedom of speech.
02:43:25 I couldn't put it more eloquently than Councilman Cohen put
02:43:30 This is something as one of our union members has mentioned,
02:43:33 this is freedom of speech.
02:43:34 This is something that has been going on since Paul revere
02:43:38 rode through the streets -- I hope I got that right -- of
02:43:43 Boston, and we need to allow that to continue.
02:43:51 In commenting, I talked about permitting before on the
02:43:54 campaign trail.
02:43:56 Senator Latvala talked about that.
02:43:59 Unfortunately our state legislature has not taken the time
02:44:01 to address this issue and it fell wayside before they
02:44:05 concluded the session.
02:44:06 I am hoping they bring that up again and whatever they pass
02:44:09 today will be tweaked or we can come back and revisit it at
02:44:12 a later time when our state legislature decides that they
02:44:14 are really going to take a step that benefits all the
02:44:17 citizens of Florida.
02:44:20 The rate of traffic brought up from Westshore Alliance is
02:44:27 And I have this cute little drawing, if I can get somebody
02:44:30 to put this on the Elmo.
02:44:31 The last time I did that I almost broke my ankle coming down
02:44:35 the stairs.
02:44:36 Thank you, Mr. Shimberg.
02:44:37 If you can put that up there.
02:44:39 And while he's doing that, I can continue on.
02:44:42 The solution is not for allowing solicitation of money from
02:44:47 vehicles, but improving the economy and looking for jobs and
02:44:50 looking for ways to be train individuals to seek jobs and to
02:44:54 find help.
02:44:55 And that's how we are going to address the issue of people
02:44:58 trying to be sustain themselves by asking for money on the
02:45:09 I am going to propose we take this first step and repeal the
02:45:13 ordinance that is currently on the books.
02:45:15 That would allow for Hillsborough County's ordinance to take
02:45:19 And I
02:45:20 Want to add one more thing.
02:45:21 I was
02:45:22 Riding with code enforcement last Friday.
02:45:24 And while I was ride with code enforcement we were on the
02:45:27 corner of Fowler and Nebraska stopped at a streetlight.
02:45:31 There was a gentleman on the sidewalk who was holding a sign
02:45:33 that said, I need work, I have a resume, please ask me for
02:45:38 So roll down the window.
02:45:39 We pulled over to the side.
02:45:40 I asked him for his resumé.
02:45:42 I have his resumé right here.
02:45:46 Tampa Police Department graciously did a check on his
02:45:49 He has never been arrested.
02:45:52 In the State of Florida.
02:45:52 He has been here since 2004.
02:45:56 So he's been in the State of Florida quite some time and has
02:45:58 not run afoul of the law.
02:46:00 He's got some excellent references here and some talent.
02:46:04 This is a fellow who needs some work.
02:46:06 So if anybody is out there who can provide some work, I
02:46:10 would like to hear from you because he's already -- I gave
02:46:13 him one of my business cards from the city.
02:46:15 He has already called my office asking if I found him a job
02:46:19 So be we have people out here who are not disabled and not
02:46:25 mentally handicapped.
02:46:27 They are able-bodied.
02:46:28 They are willing to work.
02:46:29 They are looking for work.
02:46:30 They have very good resumés.
02:46:33 And they need economic opportunity.
02:46:36 So back to the Elmo.
02:46:39 What I have got on the drawing there is, from what I
02:46:43 understand from Rebecca Kert -- you might want to come up,
02:46:47 Rebecca, to address this -- is the ordinance in Hillsborough
02:46:50 County prohibits solicitation from vehicles in the lane of
02:47:01 So if someone is on the sidewalk, and they are interacting
02:47:04 with a motor vehicle that is either on private property or
02:47:08 in the apron of the driveway, they are not in a lane of
02:47:12 traffic, and someone could leaflet, express their views,
02:47:17 politically, socially, whatever, to that vehicle, because it
02:47:22 is not yet in the lane of traffic.
02:47:24 So if you are on the sidewalk, and you are outside a
02:47:28 building or parking lot, you can still interacted with that
02:47:32 Is that correct?
02:47:32 >>REBECCA KERT: Yes.
02:47:36 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Thank you.
02:47:37 The ordinance that we was talked about by several, you know,
02:47:40 as option number 3, if we are going to open ourselves up for
02:47:47 legal challenges in the State of Florida, because it might
02:47:49 happen if we pass any of the options put before us, except
02:47:56 possibly repealing the ordinance we have now and allowing
02:48:00 Hillsborough County's ordinance to take effect. If we do
02:48:04 either of one, two or three, we are opening ourselves up to
02:48:09 court, and if we are going to go with Hillsborough County, I
02:48:16 hope that as Spencer Kass pointed out we have someone who is
02:48:21 going to step up and pay our legal fees, because we have a
02:48:25 really tight budget and I really don't want us to spend any
02:48:29 more money on legal fees.
02:48:30 That's my piece.
02:48:31 Thank you very much.
02:48:31 >>MARY MULHERN: Can did you want to hear from legal?
02:48:38 >>LISA MONTELIONE: She answered the question.
02:48:39 >>MARY MULHERN: Can I ask you one question before we go to
02:48:41 the next person?
02:48:43 >>LISA MONTELIONE: I believe I made a motion to repeal the
02:48:45 >> She, did but Madam Chair, if you could hold off on that.
02:48:52 >>MARY MULHERN: We have not heard from all of council yet
02:48:57 on the workshop discussion.
02:48:58 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Okay.
02:48:59 I'll hold it.
02:49:00 >>MARY MULHERN: Would you hold that till after we have
02:49:02 heard from everyone?
02:49:04 But I do have a question for you about what you just said.
02:49:07 Because the man that gave you his resumé, he was on the
02:49:12 >>LISA MONTELIONE: He was on the sidewalk, yes, ma'am.
02:49:14 >>MARY MULHERN: So you would still be able to have received
02:49:16 that resumé from him?
02:49:21 >>LISA MONTELIONE: We pulled over.
02:49:23 We weren't in the lane of traffic.
02:49:24 We were in the right lane, stopped at the Reid red light.
02:49:27 I saw him on the sidewalk.
02:49:28 We pulled over so that far we were not in the lane of
02:49:31 If you are a parked vehicle you are not in the lane of
02:49:33 >>MARY MULHERN: You talked fast, and I --
02:49:37 >> I was trying to get it all in.
02:49:39 >>MARY MULHERN: Mr. Suarez?
02:49:43 Councilman Reddick and Councilman -- Councilman Reddick.
02:49:51 >>FRANK REDDICK: Thank you.
02:49:53 I would like to call Chief Bennett to the mike.
02:50:00 >> John been wet, assistant chief.
02:50:06 >>FRANK REDDICK: Thank you, chief, for coming.
02:50:10 Let me just ask you a few questions, and that is, I support
02:50:16 what Councilman Cohen stated earlier, and that we are not
02:50:23 all going to be happy with getting everything we would like
02:50:26 to have.
02:50:29 But looking at this -- and I had opportunity to talk with
02:50:32 just about everybody who have will be effected by this ban,
02:50:37 if whatever action we take.
02:50:39 Number one, I will not support a motion to support the
02:50:44 Hillsborough County ordinance at all.
02:50:46 And, two, if we were to limit the number of days that a
02:50:58 person can be out on an intersection, as well as those who
02:51:03 are selling newspapers, how will that impact your
02:51:08 >> Strictly from a public safety point of view, anytime
02:51:11 there's what I would call risk reduction, by time, place and
02:51:15 manner -- that's not to talk in the legal realm of time,
02:51:19 place and manner but the risk probably.
02:51:21 And anytime, we believe it's a public safety issue.
02:51:25 If you are in the road interacting with the motoring public,
02:51:28 we think that's risk.
02:51:30 Anytime you reduce that risk, if you are shaving it down,
02:51:34 obviously you are changing -- exchanging risk in be that
02:51:40 scale, and we believe anything will make anything better, of
02:51:43 course, all relate to the point that it didn't happen.
02:51:46 >> If we put a restriction on the hours that people can
02:51:53 solicit at an intersection or sale of newspaper, how would
02:51:58 that impact the department?
02:52:00 >> Again, it's a risk reduction formula, again to be vetted
02:52:05 against the legal structure.
02:52:07 For example, right now, there's nothing passed the daylight
02:52:13 That's a risk calculation.
02:52:14 We think it's higher risk, obviously, as a city to allow
02:52:18 solicitation in the right-of-way at night.
02:52:21 So that's not allowable.
02:52:24 So if you reduce time, you are reducing the risk.
02:52:28 And that's probably the simplest way I can put it.
02:52:30 >>FRANK REDDICK: Okay.
02:52:32 And the following question to you is, on Sundays, the only
02:52:42 two organizations that I see, the newspapers, the "St. Pete
02:52:46 Times" and "The Tampa Tribune," on the street corners.
02:52:53 If they are limited to half a day, from sunrise to noon or
02:53:03 1:00 in the afternoon, woven that have an impact on your
02:53:11 >> Be it's still showing the same public safety response as
02:53:16 previous statistics, close to three calls for service per
02:53:21 Probably a-a third end up in arrest or some situation beyond
02:53:26 just responding to the call.
02:53:28 If that was reduced to six and a half days of not responding
02:53:31 to those types of calls because there wasn't something going
02:53:34 on in the right-of-way that necessitated a call for service,
02:53:38 of course it would reduce the risk.
02:53:40 >>FRANK REDDICK: Thank you.
02:53:53 Yes, we have a major issue and it's a difficult one.
02:53:56 But what is amazing to me that I see all these businesses
02:53:59 that come before us, and talk about the individual who
02:54:04 represent businesses, and saying they want a ban.
02:54:11 But I haven't seen none of those businesses say, let me go
02:54:19 take some of the people off the street corner, let me put
02:54:23 them in a training program, and let me hire them.
02:54:26 None of them have stated this.
02:54:32 They represent all the chambers, but no one has offered to
02:54:36 take none of those people off the street corners and put
02:54:40 them of in a training program and say, let me put you to
02:54:47 That concerns me.
02:54:50 But they want us to sit here and say get rid of them.
02:54:57 And the program that we had this morning, 300 some beds, and
02:55:03 we are looking for a facility -- beds, and we are looking
02:55:07 for something here in Tampa, this great city, we have got a
02:55:13 So I have been passionate about this, and still passionate
02:55:16 about it, and I thank the council colleagues for thinking of
02:55:25 the historic newspaper.
02:55:28 They only got two days a week.
02:55:34 The other newspapers, seven days.
02:55:38 And when you speak of banning six days, within exception on
02:55:45 Sunday, you are putting people out of work and business.
02:55:52 And we talked about this morning, City of Tampa got 11.2%
02:55:56 unemployment rate.
02:55:58 Where are these people going?
02:56:02 I don't know about you.
02:56:03 And most of them probably don't in my district, don't live
02:56:12 in my neighborhood, you don't have the same problem in my
02:56:16 neighborhood that you might have in yours, but I want to see
02:56:22 those people out there trying to be earn some dollars, earn
02:56:26 a living, and still trying to rob my house of breaking my
02:56:35 So, yes, it could be a public safety issue.
02:56:39 But it's also an economical issue.
02:56:42 And I just think that if I can support the three options
02:56:49 that we have, I can support number 3.
02:56:56 Because it could exempt the newspapers, and give those
02:57:01 people an opportunity to do what they need to do.
02:57:06 Secondly, I would be inclined to support restrictions,
02:57:14 operations at the time they are out there.
02:57:19 We just cannot say we are going to take these people, put
02:57:25 them in a sack and go drop them out in the field somewhere.
02:57:32 We can't do that.
02:57:35 And if you are talking about compassionate, and you want to
02:57:38 have heart, I don't see how some of you can come up here and
02:57:44 be compassionate and kind and loving people, and all you are
02:57:48 thinking about is the nuisance, is the image, or as the
02:58:03 chairman said at the end of this discussion, if you don't
02:58:06 give them a dollar they won't be out there long.
02:58:07 >>MARY MULHERN: That was the other chairman.
02:58:09 >>FRANK REDDICK: Chairman Miranda.
02:58:15 He always says if you don't give a dollar, they won't be out
02:58:18 there long.
02:58:19 Somebody out there giving them money.
02:58:22 Because they are still out there.
02:58:23 So I can support 3.
02:58:30 But I also think legal, the problem has to be that we can
02:58:40 include where the firefighters can be out there with MDA,
02:58:44 and that this organization receiving $50,000 in 2011, and
02:58:52 give back to this community, they will have an opportunity
02:58:54 to get out there and also continue to receive those type of
02:59:00 dollars through their efforts for the firefighters, and
02:59:03 there's got to be a way, I think legal, they have brilliant,
02:59:08 bright mind in the legal department for the City of Tampa,
02:59:10 and I'm sure they can find a way -- and Mr. Shimberg, you
02:59:15 can smile on that one -- to be include MDA, with the
02:59:21 firefighters to be included, and we can get this resolved,
02:59:25 even if it's on a trial basis and see if it will work.
02:59:32 But my focus would be we cannot just take some people and
02:59:37 just take these people and put them in a bag and go dump
02:59:42 them out there in the ocean somewhere and say let them
02:59:45 survive on their own.
02:59:46 It's too important.
02:59:48 And when we have 11.2% unemployment rate, we can do better
02:59:53 than that.
02:59:54 And as a member of this council, my conscience, I want my
02:59:58 conscience to be good.
03:00:00 And, therefore, Madam Chair, not going as long as last time,
03:00:08 but I think I can go along with option 3 if legal can also
03:00:17 find a way for the firefighters so MDA can benefit, receive
03:00:23 benefit from them.
03:00:24 Thank you, chief.
03:00:25 >>MARY MULHERN: Who is next?
03:00:30 Councilman Suarez?
03:00:31 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Thank you, chair.
03:00:33 Today's meeting, and I said for every meeting that we had
03:00:36 about this issue, is both informative and very passionate.
03:00:42 I want to thank Councilman Cohen, who really did the heavy
03:00:46 lifting on the legal side to try to find a good compromise
03:00:50 for us to move forward.
03:00:52 I truly believe that we need to find a way to solve this
03:00:59 public safety issue.
03:01:01 I'm a product of the working poor.
03:01:05 My grandmother had nine children.
03:01:09 And at one point had one leg and still worked more than one
03:01:13 That's not to say those people that are out on the street
03:01:15 aren't trying to find jobs, aren't hard working and aren't
03:01:19 But there have been people up here that have impugned us by
03:01:24 saying that we are not compassionate.
03:01:27 We are constrained by who we are as a City Council.
03:01:30 We are constrained by what we have as a budget.
03:01:34 We are constrained based on the law of what we can and
03:01:38 cannot do.
03:01:40 And people that want to put a layer of compassion or a layer
03:01:46 of religion or layer of anything else that deals with this
03:01:49 issue without thinking of all the other things that we have
03:01:53 to deal with is sadly mistaken.
03:01:55 We did not -- neither Mace or my colleagues ran for public
03:02:00 office to not be compassionate for people.
03:02:04 Our whole reason for running was to try to make this city
03:02:09 So when we have people on both sides of this issue that are
03:02:12 very passionate about it, I want them to understand that
03:02:16 this is not a pat answer.
03:02:19 We do not come to these decisions easily.
03:02:22 We do not come to these decisions based on some kind of
03:02:25 prejudice or some kind of reasoning that we don't like
03:02:29 people, we don't want to see people survive and we don't
03:02:32 want to have people have jobs.
03:02:34 But we are constrained.
03:02:37 I have always been in support from the very beginning that I
03:02:41 began this campaign -- and Mr. Lake, who is an attorney with
03:02:44 the Tribune will know this because one of the first places
03:02:46 that I walked was his neighborhood, and I knocked on his
03:02:49 door and he asked me what I thought about panhandling.
03:02:52 And I told him then, and I'll tell you all now, that I
03:02:57 believe that a ban is appropriate, a complete ban.
03:03:01 I think that the legal department has looked at lots of
03:03:06 different ways that we can try and make this thing work.
03:03:11 I think we are going to be sued no matter what we do.
03:03:14 The main issues that I have go back to what Councilman Cohen
03:03:18 had mentioned from the very first time, which is the first
03:03:21 amendment rights that people have do not interfere with what
03:03:25 we are going to do.
03:03:27 And I know that my friends in the union honor talked about
03:03:30 this -- and I think that we probably are at a point where we
03:03:33 may be able to do something, that isn't going to cause a
03:03:36 problem for first amendment rights, including their own.
03:03:40 But at the same time, I think that people have to
03:03:45 The federal government is very constrained right now in
03:03:48 terms of what they can do with their budget.
03:03:49 State government is.
03:03:50 As we are.
03:03:52 So we cannot come up with a vote and make it a panacea for
03:03:56 what has happened to this economy.
03:03:59 There are people that have survived the great depression,
03:04:03 were able to not only survive but thrive and become small
03:04:06 business owners, corporate executives, been able to be an
03:04:10 important part of society.
03:04:13 So again, this is not an issue of what we believe people are
03:04:16 capable of doing.
03:04:17 It's not an issue about wash we think we should do as a
03:04:20 community to help folks.
03:04:23 It is just where we are at in terms of our ability to solve
03:04:28 this particular problem.
03:04:31 Having said that, I believe that I could probably support
03:04:37 issue number 3, even though I am going to bring a motion
03:04:41 forward, before the end of this meeting, to adopt a ban that
03:04:46 was similar to St. Petersburg's ban.
03:04:49 And I would like to ask Mrs. Kert a question concerning that
03:04:52 in relation to the Hillsborough County solicitation ban.
03:04:59 There is language within the St. Petersburg ban that does
03:05:02 specifically point out that folks on the sidewalk are
03:05:06 allowed to continue first amendment activities, or even to
03:05:11 give leaflets out for their businesses, for any other
03:05:16 Is the county ban similar to what St. Petersburg has?
03:05:20 And, if not, what are those restrictions?
03:05:23 >>REBECCA KERT: The Hillsborough County ordinance is in
03:05:27 fact similar to St. Petersburg.
03:05:29 The major difference between the Hillsborough County and
03:05:32 St. Petersburg is St. Petersburg only limits the prohibited
03:05:34 conduct on their major roadways.
03:05:38 And their arterial road.
03:05:40 The other major difference is Hillsborough County's
03:05:42 ordinance does prohibit holding a sign, which I believe
03:05:48 St. Pete does not.
03:05:50 But Hillsborough County, when they recently amended their
03:05:53 ordinance, did clarify that their regulations also do not
03:05:57 apply to people on sidewalks, leafletting, other people on
03:06:02 the sidewalks, so they have that same language that St. Pete
03:06:05 >> So the language was changed from what it was originally,
03:06:08 with Hillsborough County?
03:06:09 >>REBECCA KERT: It was originally 1991 and recently within
03:06:13 the last six months, I believe, they amended it and they did
03:06:18 clarify that the public safety issue that they have is that
03:06:23 pedestrians interacting with motor vehicles when those motor
03:06:26 vehicles are in a traffic lane, not lawfully parked and not
03:06:29 pedestrian to pedestrian on the sidewalk.
03:06:31 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Thank you.
03:06:37 My final board is I want to thank this council.
03:06:39 I know that Councilwoman Mulhern, Councilwoman Capin,
03:06:42 Councilman Reddick, have had to deal with this in the past.
03:06:46 My other colleagues, Mrs. Montelione and Mr. Cohen, who
03:06:50 haven't had to deal with the number of meetings, thank you
03:06:53 for the patience that you have shown in letting us try and
03:06:56 discover where we were going to be on this particular issue.
03:06:59 So we do appreciate that.
03:07:00 >>MARY MULHERN: And you have our sympathy.
03:07:04 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Thank you, Madam Chair.
03:07:07 I appreciate it and I'm done.
03:07:08 Thank you very much.
03:07:08 >>MARY MULHERN: Councilwoman Capin.
03:07:12 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Thank you.
03:07:13 First, I want to start out, my grandfather, one of my
03:07:20 grandfathers sold fruit and vegetables in the street during
03:07:25 the depression.
03:07:26 So I understand it very well.
03:07:29 Hearing the stories, growing up.
03:07:31 But I also understand, we cannot act for fear that we may be
03:07:39 That would be shirking our responsibilities.
03:07:41 We may as well go home.
03:07:44 That cannot hold.
03:07:47 The other thing is, I think this calls for compromise, to
03:07:54 try to accommodate as many as possible, and at the same time
03:08:01 keeping our streets safe.
03:08:05 The other thing I want to say is, I have lived in this city
03:08:08 my entire life, 60 years.
03:08:13 I cannot tell you how long ago therein was street
03:08:20 That's one.
03:08:22 Newspapers have been sold in the streets as far as I can
03:08:32 Now we are looking at safety issues.
03:08:40 I feel that maybe option 3 and option 2, a combination.
03:08:49 What you have there is you have newspaper and leaflets.
03:08:56 Newspapers by and large are sold on Sunday which is the one
03:08:59 thing, which would allow charity.
03:09:03 The other thing would be, I would support that combination.
03:09:18 Also, but what I would like to amend on any of these, 3 or 2
03:09:23 or 1, is section 2, and I am going to read it.
03:09:32 But if any part of this ordinance shall be declared
03:09:34 unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent
03:09:41 jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this ordinance
03:09:42 shall maintain the full effect.
03:09:45 That, in effect, is a total ban.
03:09:59 And the reason I would amend this, striking this, is because
03:10:02 wharf we are doing here is there is no, as Rebecca Kert
03:10:09 said, there is no precedence on this rule of the newspapers
03:10:14 It has not been brought to court, and we are in unchartered
03:10:23 If we feel so confident that option 3 and the newspapers
03:10:32 will hold, then what I am offering is, we are looking at a
03:10:39 safety belt, is what this amendment is, the safety belt that
03:10:44 you use in your car.
03:10:45 You don't wear it because you are going to have an accident.
03:10:51 You wear it just in case.
03:10:54 That's why I believe we should strike this, "just in case."
03:11:00 If we strike this, then if this comes to court, it will take
03:11:08 awhile, and we will have at least a year of an ordinance to
03:11:13 actually look and come back and know, did it work or did it
03:11:18 not work, or do we need more?
03:11:21 But a total ban is what this section is going to -- is
03:11:30 And I don't believe -- and I know that I have heard from
03:11:33 several council members here, over the past few months, and
03:11:38 I don't believe that's what they want.
03:11:41 What I want to do is protect the newspapers.
03:11:45 They are a contribution to our community, and I want to
03:11:48 protect jobs.
03:11:48 As you heard earlier today, I adamantly want to protect two
03:11:54 and a half jobs.
03:11:55 So you can imagine hundreds of jobs.
03:12:00 I also want to protect the sentinel, which is a cultural and
03:12:03 economic asset to this community.
03:12:08 It is legal and Constitutional to add this amendment to the
03:12:15 option 3, striking section 2, until it is challenged lake
03:12:21 all the others, and declared unconstitutional in a court of
03:12:27 Therefore, what I am proposing, the amendment is legal and
03:12:32 Constitutional until it is declared unconstitutional by a
03:12:35 court of law.
03:12:38 That is what I would like to or will propose when we are
03:12:44 done, so that you are aware of -- again, since we cannot
03:12:51 speak outside of this dais, I have to explain to be my
03:12:56 council members what I was trying to accomplish here.
03:13:06 I'm done.
03:13:07 Thank you.
03:13:07 >>MARY MULHERN: It has been a long time.
03:13:14 I can't remember -- and I really mean that, Councilman
03:13:19 Suarez, that you and the newer council members, so I do have
03:13:26 sympathy for you having to weigh all of this, and feeling
03:13:32 the pressure, and I know that we all were elected in March,
03:13:39 and this was the favorite topic and an important topic to
03:13:43 the voters, and especially to the media, the voters and the
03:13:52 media. We spent a lot of time on it.
03:13:54 I'm going to have to go back to quite awhile ago when this
03:14:00 was first came back to us, after we -- it was recommended to
03:14:10 us by our legal, the last downfall council, legal department
03:14:14 and probably based on some compromises and ideas between the
03:14:20 newspapers and the charities and the Tampa Police
03:14:23 Department, and we voted to have the vest, and than was
03:14:32 supposed to help with the safety problem.
03:14:34 Then it came back to us that we should have a complete ban,
03:14:40 and then we got into all the other discussions.
03:14:42 And where we are today.
03:14:47 Through all of that, there was a county task force formed.
03:14:52 It wasn't just the county task force.
03:14:54 Ed included our police department, our legal department, and
03:14:59 the county, the sheriff, county administrator, county
03:15:03 commission, they were meeting for months.
03:15:07 The homeless coalition.
03:15:10 And the city last year, City Council never had the benefit
03:15:14 of what their recommendations were until they were done, and
03:15:17 then they President Obama wrote a long report which you all
03:15:22 may or may not have read, and probably have.
03:15:28 After all of this, and all of the research I've done, and
03:15:34 all of the people I've listened to, and all of the reading
03:15:37 I've done, and especially after what has been going on in
03:15:42 world and in this country as far as the gap between the rich
03:15:47 and poor, the lack of jobs, the lack of services, a really
03:15:52 good indication of where funding is for all of the needs for
03:15:56 people who may be homeless, may have mental health issues,
03:16:04 Sal Territo, our assistant city attorney, when we were
03:16:07 passing the CDBG recommendation, said, I think it was 30
03:16:13 years ago when they first came up with these federal grants,
03:16:17 the amount that we are getting now, 20 or 30 years later, I
03:16:22 don't remember how long it's been, is less than was
03:16:25 allocated back then.
03:16:27 So when people come up and say they have never seen anything
03:16:31 like this as far as how many people are panhandling, and how
03:16:34 many homeless people there are, it's true, because not only
03:16:43 is there a bigger population, and are there less services,
03:16:46 but, you know, there is no funding.
03:16:48 And so this is what I have to say about this decision.
03:16:59 For me, it was always about -- I don't feel threatened.
03:17:05 I've never felt scared.
03:17:06 I'm not saying that other people shouldn't or don't.
03:17:11 My own family feels lake it's threatening when someone is
03:17:17 asking for money when you're driving, you know, stopped at a
03:17:21 I don't feel that way.
03:17:24 But what I feel like I have to make a decision on is whether
03:17:29 there's any evidence that this is a safety risk.
03:17:35 So what have we heard?
03:17:41 There is one statistic of a death.
03:17:44 I think it was a panhandler, and I think it was in the
03:17:47 county, and it was also documented that this person was way
03:17:52 over the legal alcohol limit.
03:17:54 So whatever he was doing, wherever he was in the street, he
03:17:58 was also very inebriated.
03:18:03 That's the one statistic that we have had from law
03:18:08 enforcement about the danger to those individuals.
03:18:13 The danger to the drivers.
03:18:17 We have anecdotal evidence.
03:18:18 And I don't doubt that some people feel afraid.
03:18:22 But I'm like the woman whose car door locks automatically,
03:18:28 and I have lived in really bad neighborhood.
03:18:31 I always feel safe in Tampa, and I lock my doors.
03:18:34 But I just have never felt threatened there.
03:18:36 So now I am going to say the really bad thing that I know no
03:18:40 one wants me to say, but if there are people who are in the
03:18:47 street and who are acting threateningly a, aggressively,
03:18:53 everybody has a cell phone, and you should call the police
03:18:58 And the kind of activity that you find threatening is
03:19:03 probably illegal.
03:19:07 And when you get a few times a panhandler is harassing
03:19:12 somebody, the police come, they pick them up and you get
03:19:14 those bad actors off the street.
03:19:18 So I like the idea of the spirit of compromise.
03:19:23 But I cannot vote to make something illegal based on the
03:19:31 And honestly when we all talk to each other, when I talk to
03:19:37 constituents, and I talk to people outside of these public
03:19:40 meetings, it is about the Chamber of Commerce and about how
03:19:46 we look.
03:19:48 It's not my job -- the Chamber of Commerce can advocate for
03:19:55 how we look, but it's our job to make sure that the way that
03:19:58 we act and the way that we legislate and the way that we
03:20:03 treat each other is right.
03:20:04 Not how we look.
03:20:05 So if we address the symptoms, then we don't have the
03:20:14 And Chairman Miranda is right.
03:20:18 If people would quit giving money, you have that choice.
03:20:24 So if you all decide, the majority will win, and in a one
03:20:29 will be out there panhandling.
03:20:31 But I just can't do it.
03:20:33 I feel very bad about this, because -- you know, I said this
03:20:46 many, many, many meetings, and at one point I did try to
03:20:50 make a compromise, with Chairman Scott, because we were
03:20:52 trying to find a way that not only could we allow the
03:20:55 newspapers to still sell their newspapers by doing it on,
03:21:00 you know, roads that were main thoroughfares, but we also
03:21:03 wouldn't completely eliminate the option of people asking
03:21:09 for money but I can't do it and honest, and I'm from one of
03:21:16 those big families that we came up from nothing, too and I
03:21:20 sent my siblings and said, I can't believe this, I have this
03:21:23 decision I have to make, and I don't know who to ask for
03:21:27 And I talked to a lot of preachers, too and rabbis and
03:21:33 anyone who could give me advice.
03:21:34 And I realize that the only person who could have advised me
03:21:40 is my dad, who was on the City Council in this little suburb
03:21:45 where I grew up, and my dad has been gone for a long time.
03:21:50 But I nobody what he would have said, and he would have
03:21:54 said, you know, you have to do what you believe is morally
03:22:00 And I don't think this is just morally.
03:22:04 This is legally.
03:22:05 I don't see a case for us adopting any kind of ban.
03:22:12 I don't see it.
03:22:13 I think it's more important for me to be up here making a
03:22:19 speech, because I am an elected public official, and I do
03:22:24 worry about us starting to criminalize poverty, to
03:22:30 criminalize charity, and it's a slippery slope.
03:22:38 So, yes, I do think there's been a case made that this is
03:22:42 It's not a strong enough case for me.
03:22:47 I don't believe that means it's not a strong enough case for
03:22:49 other people.
03:22:51 But it's not strong enough for me.
03:22:53 But I think that we already see that not only are we talking
03:22:59 about banning panhandling, but we don't want to see the
03:23:03 homeless on the street anymore.
03:23:06 We don't want people to be in the parks.
03:23:13 , and Tampa has been forced into this role, because all of
03:23:18 our peers are doing it.
03:23:19 And I just can't be succumb to have been than peer group
03:23:26 It's just not going to work.
03:23:27 So I'm sorry to council that I am not going to work on a
03:23:30 compromise, I can't vote for anything.
03:23:34 And back to you.
03:23:35 Councilwoman Capin.
03:23:37 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Okay.
03:23:39 I'm going to go ahead and tell you what I'm thinking here;
03:23:45 to propose a six-day, one day, which is option two, with the
03:23:49 exception of newspapers and leaflets which is option 3, with
03:23:54 no severability, and should it be brought down by the
03:23:59 courts, we revert to what we have today, and we have, from
03:24:06 that point, 90 days to -- 90 days to conform to what the
03:24:20 court asks.
03:24:22 Did you understand it?
03:24:23 I am going to repeat it.
03:24:24 Did you understand it?
03:24:25 Did everyone understand it?
03:24:28 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I did but I have a question, actually a
03:24:30 legal question concerning that specifically.
03:24:35 Ms. Kert?
03:24:36 It sounds to me -- and again Karri Ramo on this -- but with
03:24:42 her particular motion, 2 and 3 was to use it, or I think 3
03:24:51 was to use the county ordinance to go forward and make it as
03:24:57 a hybrid case.
03:24:59 Please explain to us what that would do using her particular
03:25:02 >>REBECCA KERT: To effectuate the first part of the motion
03:25:06 which was the substance of it, combining the six-day ban,
03:25:12 will require us to come back, because -- well, it just will.
03:25:18 >>MIKE SUAREZ: We have to craft a new ordinance?
03:25:20 >> Yes.
03:25:20 I will have to tweak the ordinance that you have before you.
03:25:23 As to the second part of the motion, I do understand Ms.
03:25:27 Capin's concern with the severability language that is
03:25:32 currently in the regulation.
03:25:34 We typically always have severability language.
03:25:38 That means we want to the remain.
03:25:42 We don't have to have that.
03:25:43 In fact, what's in here is much stronger than we normally
03:25:47 I am not sure given the fact that what you have is a ban in
03:25:51 your transportation code on one ordinance, and then off
03:25:54 business regulation to be allow newspaper street sales in
03:25:58 chapter 6, because they are separate ordinances and separate
03:26:02 sections of the code I'm not sure if we can have those all
03:26:06 But at the end of the day the way it's written now it's
03:26:09 intended if anything gets severed you will end up with a
03:26:12 complete ban.
03:26:13 At the same time, even if we were able to make them all fall
03:26:18 together, if any portion of it goes, it all goes.
03:26:20 You will still be under a complete ban because you will be
03:26:22 under Hillsborough County's ban because you will have
03:26:24 nothing in effect.
03:26:30 >>YVONNE CAPIN: And the third part was, if that is the case,
03:26:32 what I am I saying, it reverts to what we have today.
03:26:38 It reverts to what we have today.
03:26:40 And then we have 90 days to come up we've an ordinance that
03:26:47 conforms to the court's orders.
03:26:50 >>REBECCA KERT: Legal department.
03:27:06 I have a couple concerns about that.
03:27:07 And Mr. Shimberg can certainly jump in.
03:27:10 I have a concern about binding a future council to have to
03:27:15 make a change, and if that council does not want to make a
03:27:20 I am certainly willing to look into the earlier portion
03:27:26 about reverting back to what we have now.
03:27:28 I can't promise that until I start writing it to see how
03:27:32 that's going to play out, because we will be repealing it,
03:27:35 and I'm not sure if you can reenact it based upon a court's
03:27:40 I think you would actually have to come back.
03:27:45 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Okay, we are repealing it, therefore it's
03:27:46 not on the books.
03:27:48 So we can't revert to it.
03:27:50 >>REBECCA KERT: Thank you, that's much better.
03:27:55 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I'm trying to understand.
03:27:56 I want to know that I understood what you said.
03:27:58 So, therefore, then we would have to come back and come up
03:28:09 with anew ordinance.
03:28:10 >>REBECCA KERT: Yes.
03:28:14 City Council always has the adoption to adopt a new
03:28:18 >>MARTIN SHELBY: You don't have to, because in the absence
03:28:23 of the ordinance existing, the county's ordinance would
03:28:27 control, until such time as the City Council or future City
03:28:30 Council chooses to come back to the issue.
03:28:34 >>YVONNE CAPIN: That's why I put the 90 days.
03:28:36 Well, if we can't revert, and you are not comfortable with
03:28:42 strapping another council with 90 days to come up with a new
03:28:45 ordinance, then we are in effect, the county's ordinance --
03:28:57 >>JIM SHIMBERG: City attorney.
03:28:57 One thing I want to clarify, first of all, just because
03:29:01 somebody challenges an ordinance, doesn't mean that hits
03:29:05 struck down or declared invalid.
03:29:07 That could be a very long process in order to get to that
03:29:10 Second of all, in the event that that ever happens, we would
03:29:13 always come back to council and say, such and such an
03:29:16 ordinance on the books has now been struck down by a court,
03:29:21 and ask council for your pleasure as to be what you want to
03:29:24 do, if you quantity to be adopt another ordinance, and so we
03:29:27 would always come back to you in that event and ask the
03:29:31 council, this council or future council, what they would
03:29:35 want to do.
03:29:37 I don't think we can bind that council to do something in a
03:29:40 period of time.
03:29:43 >>YVONNE CAPIN: So can it be struck, the --
03:29:49 >>JIM SHIMBERG: We can look at that H.again, the motion that
03:29:50 you made is sort of a combination which will require us to
03:29:53 come back in two weeks for the ordinance.
03:29:59 >>YVONNE CAPIN: If I am understanding you right, whether we
03:30:01 strike it or not, it still will revert to Hillsborough
03:30:05 County if a court of law strikes any part.
03:30:10 >>JIM SHIMBERG: the ordinance that you put in place gets
03:30:14 struck down and we have nothing in place, then Hillsborough
03:30:16 County's would control.
03:30:17 If we have something else in place -- the only time
03:30:20 Hillsborough County's is in control is if you do not have a
03:30:23 conflicting ordinance in place.
03:30:25 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Then why do we have this here?
03:30:26 Why is this here?
03:30:29 Either way it reverts to Hillsborough County.
03:30:31 >>REBECCA KERT: Legal department.
03:30:33 Why do we have the severability language in therein? For a
03:30:38 couple of reasons.
03:30:39 Number one, you do have an option 3, the exemption to
03:30:42 leafletting that Hillsborough County doesn't have.
03:30:44 And in an effort to preserve what council has as its own
03:30:50 ordinance, we have that in there.
03:30:51 The practical effect is if the leafletting person got struck
03:30:55 down, or the newspaper portion got struck down, what you are
03:30:58 left with, if they do severe, looks very similar to what
03:31:02 Hillsborough County has.
03:31:03 So the effect is not that much different.
03:31:08 We were trying to preserve council having its own ordinance
03:31:11 on the books.
03:31:12 >>MIKE SUAREZ: May I make a suggestion?
03:31:18 I apologize.
03:31:19 >>FRANK REDDICK: If that's a motion --
03:31:25 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I didn't put it in the motion.
03:31:26 It's something that I will propose.
03:31:27 But I wanted to discuss it with legal.
03:31:29 It's a discussion.
03:31:31 It's not a motion.
03:31:31 >> I think for the purpose of trying to get forward on what
03:31:46 we are doing on the workshop, I would like to make a
03:31:49 I am going to make a motion.
03:31:51 And then if it survives, dies, whatever happens, then we can
03:31:54 go on to the other options that we have and just continue on
03:31:57 that way until we either get something that we are going to
03:32:01 use or make a decision on what the next steps are.
03:32:03 If I could, I would like to make a motion that we adopt an
03:32:08 ordinance -- and again, I do like the fact that to let the
03:32:16 county do it, but because of some of the language in it, I
03:32:19 would like to have an ordinance similar to the St. Pete
03:32:22 ordinance, because I do like the language in that.
03:32:27 To ban solicitation in the rights-of-way except for those on
03:32:31 the sidewalk, other areas.
03:32:36 >>MARY MULHERN: You made your statement --
03:32:44 >>YVONNE CAPIN: That's a motion.
03:32:44 >>MARY MULHERN: I want to suggest that we hear from
03:32:49 >>MIKE SUAREZ: The only reason I said that is because the
03:32:56 motion is not part of the other three options that we have
03:32:59 read on and looked at.
03:33:00 I wanted to bring that out first.
03:33:02 If there is a discussion as part, that's fine, too.
03:33:05 But I just think that because they have gone through all
03:33:08 this work and legal department and Councilman Cohen and
03:33:12 everything else, that I am doing something a little
03:33:14 different, and a little off the reservation, so to speak,
03:33:17 and if it dies, if it doesn't die.
03:33:20 >>MARY MULHERN: We also have Councilwoman Montelione.
03:33:25 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Well, I did agree to hold off until
03:33:32 everybody spoke.
03:33:33 So I am not sure if technically it dies for lack of a second
03:33:36 or I just was holding off until everybody spoke.
03:33:39 >>MARY MULHERN: Can I suggest we have a discussion about
03:33:43 what you have heard, their option?
03:34:06 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Mr. Shimberg, the first time you started
03:34:09 talking about it, it is nearly identical to the
03:34:18 St. Petersburg ordinance.
03:34:21 >>JIM SHIMBERG: City attorney.
03:34:22 I understand the St. Pete only applies to the major --
03:34:26 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Right, major arterials.
03:34:29 >>JIM SHIMBERG: There are some differences.
03:34:30 >> The major arterials.
03:34:34 And my concern with that is -- and I had this concern with
03:34:38 the last council discussing this, that if we la at a ban on
03:34:41 the major arterials, then we run the risk of pushing folks
03:34:48 deeper into neighborhoods.
03:34:50 So that would be my concern about an ordinance, the way they
03:34:56 have it in St. Petersburg.
03:34:57 So I'm still -- I still believe -- and I think correct me if
03:35:03 I am wrong if I have this wrong -- whatever we do, Weaver to
03:35:06 repeal the ordinance on the books.
03:35:07 So --
03:35:10 >>JIM SHIMBERG: Unless we amend it.
03:35:10 >>LISA MONTELIONE: So the ordinance, the motion that I made
03:35:13 previously, still going to have to go first.
03:35:17 But I do have other observations.
03:35:19 To Mr. Reddick's sentiments, and again, you know, I have
03:35:25 great respect for all my colleagues.
03:35:26 We put a lot of thought and a lot of heart wrenching time in
03:35:32 listening to people, and reading things.
03:35:34 And the first speaker, ma'am, I'm telling you, I was almost
03:35:37 moved to tears listening to what you had to say, because it
03:35:42 really reflects how I feel personally.
03:35:45 I have said this before.
03:35:47 I have taken homeless people into my house.
03:35:48 I have fed people.
03:35:49 I have clothed people.
03:35:50 I have taken care of their children.
03:35:52 I still have the pit bull from when they were living with us
03:35:56 because they couldn't not take the dog with them.
03:35:58 So I have done all of those things.
03:36:03 Councilman Cohen has put himself outside of his comfort zone
03:36:07 to go and really spend time to try and learn and to be try
03:36:13 and educate ourselves.
03:36:14 We all have.
03:36:16 And it's not, you know, it's not -- the one exception to
03:36:20 what you said was good old boys patting each other on the
03:36:25 back, and Mr. Suarez said that, we don't come to this
03:36:29 decision easily.
03:36:30 Believe me we don't.
03:36:31 And other councils have debated this in the past, and we
03:36:36 have again here.
03:36:37 The reason it's taken us so long is because we have that
03:36:41 heart, and it's hard for us to try and find a solution,
03:36:46 because the solution does come in increased work, increased
03:36:51 economy, public-private partnerships, being creative,
03:36:54 finding solutions.
03:36:55 I mean, it's going to take the work of a village.
03:36:59 And I think that has been said before.
03:37:03 Businesses, some of them do -- our Publix has a policy of
03:37:08 hiring those who are mentally and physically challenged.
03:37:10 Without the paycheck that some of them receive from their
03:37:14 work as baggers at grocery stores, they might be on the
03:37:19 You know, in the construction industry, therein Bub for the
03:37:26 grace of God go I, because I am near -- you know, I'm near
03:37:30 to the problem than most.
03:37:32 People call us every day lag for jobs.
03:37:36 People we haven't heard from in 15 years are calling us.
03:37:39 Please, you're still in business, I need a job, I'll do
03:37:43 So I understand.
03:37:45 And no one has ever suggested that we dump people in a field
03:37:50 and just push the problem into Tampa Bay or cover it up or
03:37:53 any such thing.
03:37:54 So I have great respect for you, Mr. Reddick, but that's not
03:37:59 something that any of us have ever expressed sentiments
03:38:05 We all are committed to working towards opportunity.
03:38:08 We all understand we need beds, we need further assistance,
03:38:11 we need to raise money.
03:38:12 I say it over and over again, we need to raise money for the
03:38:16 causes that are working their tails off to be try to provide
03:38:20 services for people.
03:38:21 We need to protect the freedom of speech.
03:38:26 I buy my sentinel.
03:38:27 I pull over on Lake Avenue.
03:38:29 I pull over to the side of the road and park the car, put
03:38:32 the car in park and make my purchase.
03:38:35 I mean, there are ways of transacting.
03:38:41 I have been out there are with the unions.
03:38:43 And I have been handing out leaflets.
03:38:45 And there are ways to do it.
03:38:47 And Hillsborough County, with my nice cute little drawing,
03:38:52 there are ways where you can still practice your freedom of
03:38:54 speech on the sidewalk.
03:38:57 Not in a lane of traffic.
03:38:59 Not on a median.
03:39:00 And although the statistics may not be there for the
03:39:04 accidents, there are plenty of times when things don't get
03:39:07 reported, and I feel many people have said folks are just
03:39:12 one text message away.
03:39:16 So my motion still stands to repeal our ordinance as it is.
03:39:20 If you want to have more discussion, I agree with you, we
03:39:23 can keep the dialogue going.
03:39:25 We'll have more discussion.
03:39:26 But I believe anything we do today, we are going to have to
03:39:29 take that first step and repeal the ordinance that we have
03:39:31 on the books.
03:39:31 >>MARY MULHERN: Is there a second?
03:39:35 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I'll second that.
03:39:37 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor -- okay, I'm sorry.
03:39:46 Councilman Cohen.
03:39:51 >> There's a motion on the floor now.
03:39:54 >>MARY MULHERN: You can speak on the motion.
03:40:04 I'm sorry.
03:40:04 >>LISA MONTELIONE: I do want to be hear from Councilman
03:40:14 >>MIKE SUAREZ: I withdraw my second.
03:40:17 >>MARY MULHERN: This is what I used to do to get the
03:40:21 chair's attention.
03:40:22 >>HARRY COHEN: Before we had motions on the floor, I think
03:40:26 it would be helpful to review where we are at this moment.
03:40:29 There are six of us sitting up here.
03:40:31 Everyone has expressed a view on what they are or are not
03:40:35 comfortable with.
03:40:36 So in my mind, the best way to proceed forward is be to
03:40:41 start looking to the areas of agreement and see where we can
03:40:46 bridge some of the areas of disagreement.
03:40:49 I have great respect for councilwoman Mulhern.
03:40:53 From what I heard, however, she is not inclined to be part
03:40:56 of a compromise solution, but there are five other members
03:41:00 up here that are.
03:41:02 I heard from Councilman Reddick a concern about the
03:41:07 firefighters collecting for muscular dystrophy, and I heard
03:41:11 from Councilwoman Capin a concern about the severability
03:41:17 For the moment I am putting aside Councilwoman Montelione
03:41:20 and Councilman's Suarez's concerns about the issue of just
03:41:26 going forward with the St. Pete style ordinance.
03:41:28 I have heard that as well.
03:41:29 But I am again trying to find the common ground between what
03:41:33 I would call now the five remaining votes.
03:41:39 My first question is for legal department.
03:41:41 Is it possible to come back with an ordinance that combines
03:41:45 options 2 and 3?
03:41:48 >>JIM SHIMBERG: Yes.
03:41:48 >>HARRY COHEN: Okay.
03:41:51 If we were to do that, and I just want to clarify this, the
03:41:54 language in option 2 would directly address Mr. Reddick's
03:42:01 concern, correct?
03:42:03 >>JIM SHIMBERG: Correct.
03:42:03 >>HARRY COHEN: In terms of the severability issue that
03:42:07 Councilwoman Capin raised, I will tell you the truth.
03:42:13 My preference was to have the severability language in there
03:42:17 because I felt that if something happened down the road,
03:42:22 where a portion of it were declared unconstitutional, at
03:42:26 least the rest of it would still stand.
03:42:28 But it seems to me that if that language is removed, there's
03:42:33 nothing that prevents this council from coming back
03:42:35 immediately and determining what course of action it wants
03:42:39 to take regarding moving forward in the future.
03:42:42 After all, we don't know what portion of the ordinance might
03:42:46 be struck down.
03:42:47 So it's very difficult to address preemptively what we don't
03:42:54 >>JIM SHIMBERG: City attorney.
03:42:55 And Mr. Shelby can correct me if I am wrong.
03:42:57 But council could always come back and make a change to an
03:43:00 ordinance at any time.
03:43:03 You just have the process.
03:43:04 So I agree with what you are saying.
03:43:06 >>HARRY COHEN: So we can go back for a motion.
03:43:13 But the fact of the matter is there is only one thing that I
03:43:16 have heard said today that has any way of passing, and that
03:43:23 is a hybrid of options 2 and 3, with getting rid of the
03:43:30 If that's the case, I would respectfully suggest that we
03:43:34 move in that direction.
03:43:35 >>MARY MULHERN: Councilman Capin.
03:43:43 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Thank you, Councilman Cohen.
03:43:45 I also want to say in reference to when I referred to that
03:43:51 should it be struck down, the 90 days to come back, and
03:43:55 there was a concern about putting that under another
03:44:00 It may be a concern, but it's not a rule.
03:44:03 It can be done.
03:44:05 Now, they can ignore it or they can act on it.
03:44:09 Either one.
03:44:10 It's the council's choice.
03:44:13 >>JIM SHIMBERG: You can bring the issue back.
03:44:15 >>YVONNE CAPIN: 90 days, no term, but to come back.
03:44:18 But that is moot because we just said, which is -- that was
03:44:24 my thought.
03:44:25 I wanted to put that out there because I wanted to clarify
03:44:27 that we may not be comfortable be putting 90 days on a
03:44:33 future council -- City Council.
03:44:37 But it is not something that we cannot do.
03:44:42 So I wanted to clear that up.
03:44:44 The other thing was that when I heard Councilman Cohen
03:44:50 again, what are we agreeing on?
03:44:54 Well, a few of us.
03:44:58 3 and 2 with severability, and then I would like to add
03:45:06 something for council to act on, because we can leave it the
03:45:12 way it is.
03:45:13 For instance, if the leaflet part of 2 and 3, if we come up
03:45:18 with that compromise, is struck down, we don't have to do
03:45:22 It just stays.
03:45:26 >>JIM SHIMBERG: I'm a little confused about your
03:45:28 You are asking us to remove the severability provision.
03:45:30 That's what protects you in the event that part of it but
03:45:33 not all of is it struck down.
03:45:35 So finance you want to leave that in there, because, for
03:45:37 example, if part of it was struck down, the rest of it would
03:45:40 still be -- if any of it is struck down, you want it to come
03:45:43 automatically back to council?
03:45:45 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I want council -- yes, I want it -- and
03:45:48 council has -- the council will have the benefit -- that
03:45:52 council at that time, to act on that.
03:45:56 And I would say whatever the court deems, or they have the
03:46:05 choice to ignore it or to act on it.
03:46:07 It is not -- be and --
03:46:13 >>HARRY COHEN: Actually that's a great point.
03:46:15 The fact of the matter is, the court, we are can't
03:46:17 anticipate what somebody court may or may not do.
03:46:21 But what we do know is that regardless of what they do, the
03:46:24 very next Thursday, this council can come back and react,
03:46:28 and devote to do -- vote to do whatever it would like.
03:46:32 So we may be putting the cart before the horse in getting
03:46:35 too far afield with this whole severability argument.
03:46:39 >>MARY MULHERN: I expressed my feeling about the three
03:46:44 options that we have.
03:46:47 And I have to say this.
03:46:52 We were brought three options than were written by legal.
03:46:59 And I know Councilman Cohen did a lot of work on them.
03:47:02 But Councilwoman Capin, you brought up some very important
03:47:07 points about it, and I think what you are faced with here is
03:47:12 the fact that while you are trying to arrive -- we are
03:47:18 trying to arrive at a compromise, because this council did
03:47:20 not want, ever want to adopt a complete ban.
03:47:27 I think that you have a very valid problem, and it basically
03:47:37 says, if, in fact -- and I wonder if that's inviting someone
03:47:42 to challenge it.
03:47:43 But I -- I hate to say it because I know we want to be done.
03:47:49 But the fact of repealing our ordinances and basically
03:47:56 adopting the county's and then adding the exception was a
03:48:01 decision on how to write this as a policy decision, of three
03:48:07 different options, and if you are not happy with it -- to be
03:48:17 come back with this that says what you, with this council is
03:48:20 comfortable with.
03:48:21 So I think that --
03:48:25 >>JIM SHIMBERG: We have to do have that anyway.
03:48:27 >>HARRY COHEN: I don't think this issue is unsurmountable.
03:48:34 I really don't.
03:48:35 I this that our legal team heard what we have to say today.
03:48:38 I think it's clear what the concern is.
03:48:40 And if it's not addressed, then we take up whatever is
03:48:45 brought back to us, then you can vote no.
03:48:47 I'm sorry.
03:48:48 >>FRANK REDDICK: All right?
03:48:55 Well, sitting here thinking, I'm going to ask legal to come
03:49:02 up with another option, and that is, I don't want a complete
03:49:07 I want us to look at a four-day ban, a ban of three days
03:49:15 with option of four, that will allow newspapers sales, and
03:49:26 also ow on the street, so it won't be a complete ban.
03:49:31 And then I'm also -- ask that you also include a description
03:49:37 of hours of operation, for the public on that.
03:49:44 So basically what I'm asking is that not a complete ban
03:49:49 seven days of the week, so I would like to see an option
03:49:53 where people will be able to be out there four days --
03:50:02 >> three days?
03:50:03 >> Well, I was looking at four days, and the days I was
03:50:07 going to specify, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday, and
03:50:15 come up with a restriction on hours of eight to five, or
03:50:22 sunrise to five, and I just want to see that option as well.
03:50:26 >>MARY MULHERN: Councilwoman Montelione.
03:50:30 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Well, I think, the way I understand it,
03:50:34 I am going to do a recap.
03:50:38 Option 2, because just for the public watching, it's very
03:50:41 confusing when you go two, three, all these numbers.
03:50:45 Option 2 would be similar to the Pasco County ordinance
03:50:51 which allows solicitation on Sundays.
03:50:55 It's a six-day ban.
03:50:57 On option 3 is an exemption which would have allowed
03:51:04 exemptions, which would be a seven-day ban, with the
03:51:09 exception of newspapers and transactions not requiring the
03:51:13 exchange of an object which means you can leaflet.
03:51:16 So there's freedom of speech protected in there.
03:51:19 That would allow any day of the week, any day of the week,
03:51:23 you can transact newspapers or things that are not requiring
03:51:29 the exchange of an object.
03:51:30 So you can do that seven days a week.
03:51:33 So I'm not sure why we would go to three or four days or
03:51:37 something like that, because those things would be allowed
03:51:40 seven days a week under option 3.
03:51:43 Including the newspapers.
03:51:48 >>FRANK REDDICK: Yeah, but limit to firefighters if they
03:51:51 wanted to be out there.
03:51:54 Is that correct?
03:51:55 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Well, it's transactions not requiring
03:51:57 the exchange of an object.
03:51:58 >> I think the firefighters were covered understood option 2
03:52:04 so did it limit them to Sunday.
03:52:05 But what I heard from the speaker for muscular dystrophy was
03:52:11 that was an acceptable -- that was acceptable.
03:52:14 >>MARY MULHERN: You have to come to the microphone.
03:52:18 >>LISA MONTELIONE: If you want to speak you have to come to
03:52:20 the microphone.
03:52:20 But that's what my clarification is for the public watching.
03:52:23 Option 2 would be a six-day ban, and Sunday only.
03:52:27 So that would be allow anybody on Sunday.
03:52:30 And if we combine that with option 3, it wore allow the
03:52:35 protection for the freedom of speech and for newspapers
03:52:39 sales seven days a week.
03:52:41 So that's what the combination of 2 and 3 would be do.
03:52:47 Personally, I understand from legal and what you have said
03:52:51 earlier, I'm not sure the severability is -- would be
03:52:56 something that I could support removing the severability,
03:52:58 because if -- if perhaps this gets challenged, and the court
03:53:04 comes back with, well, you can keep the Sunday-only part,
03:53:09 because you are not excepting out one particular group.
03:53:13 Everybody, no matter what their cause is, can be out there
03:53:15 on a Sunday and you are not showing protection for one group
03:53:20 over another.
03:53:21 If the court comes back and says, well, that part is okay,
03:53:25 the rest of it, you know, is unconstitutional as far as
03:53:28 newspaper transactions go, then at least we have the Sunday
03:53:34 So that's why my reason for keeping the severability in
03:53:38 >>MARY MULHERN: Can we hear from -- just one question.
03:53:42 >> If that's the compromise that is going to be the one that
03:53:47 gets passed, yes, out of all the three options, Sunday we
03:53:51 would prefer, because to be able to walk on the streets on
03:53:56 one day.
03:53:56 It's not the best day, but it's better than no day.
03:53:59 >>HARRY COHEN: I just want to make a comment about the
03:54:05 four-day suggestion because here is the problem that I see
03:54:07 with the four-day option.
03:54:09 Similar to actually -- Councilwoman Capin had suggested a
03:54:12 five-day option at one point.
03:54:14 If you examine the traffic data, there is simply not data to
03:54:20 support choosing one day over another as a public safety
03:54:25 The issue with Sunday is than there's less traffic on
03:54:28 Sunday, there's less going on on the road, people are not
03:54:32 drinking on Sunday mornings the way that have been they may
03:54:35 be during the rest of the week.
03:54:37 So if you look -- if you look at the -- if you look at the
03:54:42 crash statistics, you will see that Sunday morning is a much
03:54:46 safer time to be out on the road.
03:54:47 When you get anything beyond Sunday, it becomes very, very
03:54:52 difficult to make an argument based on the traffic patterns.
03:54:55 And that's what has constrained us from going down that
03:55:00 Otherwise, when we were looking at the sentinel's concerns,
03:55:03 we could have looked at Tuesdays and Fridays, but there just
03:55:07 wasn't -- there just wasn't a factual basis there.
03:55:10 >>FRANK REDDICK: Based on what we have here, you are saying
03:55:13 combine the 2 and 3 and we can come up with seven days be,
03:55:20 you can just go out there seven days a week, is that what
03:55:23 you are saying?
03:55:25 >>HARRY COHEN: Or if you are expecting -- excepting purely
03:55:28 political speech.
03:55:29 >>FRANK REDDICK: Okay.
03:55:33 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Thank you.
03:55:34 That is the compromise that I was proposing.
03:55:35 But I would like to keep striking the severability because
03:55:40 you can act on it at any time.
03:55:43 If any part is struck you can come back and it will cancel
03:55:50 But come back -- I do believe, and if both parties are --
03:55:59 parts are canceled, it is a total ban.
03:56:01 And I would rather the be council address it without the
03:56:16 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Can I ask legal a question?
03:56:18 I don't want to see this drag on to yet another council
03:56:20 meeting where we are going to have another full-blown
03:56:24 discussion, and open up the can of worms by bringing it back
03:56:27 once again.
03:56:28 So can we do this?
03:56:30 Can be we pass what councilwoman Capin is asking for, a
03:56:38 combination of option 2 and option 3, striking severability,
03:56:42 and pass that ordinance today?
03:56:46 >>JIM SHIMBERG: No.
03:56:47 We can't do that because that's a combination.
03:56:50 We don't have it ready today.
03:56:51 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Can we do this?
03:56:54 Can be we pass the combination of option 2 and option 3, and
03:56:59 then next month bring back an ordinance than strikes the
03:57:05 severability, so that this way, we already had the
03:57:08 discussion, we have already made the decision, and all we
03:57:10 are doing is bringing it back for an amendment to the
03:57:13 ordinance that we passed today?
03:57:19 >>MARY MULHERN: If you can agree on what you want to pass,
03:57:21 and it's going to include striking that severability, this
03:57:26 is a workshop meeting.
03:57:29 They can come back with one ordinance at our next Meg
03:57:31 regular meeting.
03:57:34 County pass on first reading consideration.
03:57:36 So I think it's better to write something that will pass
03:57:40 than to -- the majority is in agreement on?
03:57:49 >>JIM SHIMBERG: Can I say one thing?
03:57:50 First I agree with what you said.
03:57:52 We do need to come back because there are some
03:57:53 inconsistencies between 3 and 2 so we would need to sort of
03:58:00 Taylor that.
03:58:01 But we do have some concern with striking severability.
03:58:04 My understanding is that, you know, the city always puts
03:58:07 that in every ordinance in order to really protect council.
03:58:10 And so we need to just look at that, and whether we can
03:58:13 strike that.
03:58:15 Council could always look at the issue.
03:58:17 If part of it gets struck and there's nothing to stop you
03:58:20 from immediately considering an amendment.
03:58:23 But by taking the severability out of all of these is
03:58:28 something we just need to look at and make sure that we can
03:58:31 feel comfortable with that.
03:58:32 We are not ready to say that right out.
03:58:35 I understand your point.
03:58:36 I understand your point, that you don't want the court to be
03:58:40 able to pick and choose and council to be stuck with that.
03:58:42 You want council to be then have an opportunity to come
03:58:45 But you do have that opportunity anyway.
03:58:50 >>YVONNE CAPIN: But I want it in writing.
03:58:51 I want the council -- they go ignore it, but they have to
03:58:54 address it.
03:58:55 They have to choose not to do anything.
03:58:59 That's what I am asking.
03:59:01 In writing.
03:59:02 If the severability is not struck, then on there, the
03:59:07 council, whoever is sitting here, will have to address it.
03:59:10 If they choose to ignore it and leave it as is, that is
03:59:14 their choice.
03:59:16 >>JIM SHIMBERG: I'm wondering --
03:59:18 >>YVONNE CAPIN: But I don't want it to be ignored.
03:59:20 I want it to have to be addressed.
03:59:22 >>JIM SHIMBERG: Mr. Shelby, is there a way if they pass it
03:59:25 they could have a special motion attached to it saying if
03:59:27 any part of is it struck down by a court that it would be
03:59:30 brought back to council for consideration?
03:59:32 >>MARY MULHERN: Let me ask you a question.
03:59:34 >>JIM SHIMBERG: I think you can do that which would solve it
03:59:36 without taking the severability out.
03:59:37 >>MARY MULHERN: Be if an ordinance that council has passed
03:59:42 is declared -- is struck down, unconstitutional, doesn't it
03:59:48 come back to us always?
03:59:50 >>JIM SHIMBERG: We won bring that to you.
03:59:51 But the way that severability language reads, if a portion
03:59:54 of it gets struck down, it doesn't invalidate the rest of
03:59:58 And what she is, I think, asking for, if any portion of it
04:00:02 gets struck down, it would invalidate the whole thing, even
04:00:05 the parts that were not unconstitutional.
04:00:07 So my issue is maybe just have been a separate motion saying
04:00:10 that if any part of it is struck down, it would be brought
04:00:14 back to council for a discussion as to whether you want to
04:00:17 take any further action.
04:00:18 It won't force you to but it would at least bring it back to
04:00:22 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Right, it would have to addressed.
04:00:25 Whatever is decided is decided.
04:00:27 At the same time you can leave the severability and protect
04:00:29 the portions which I think was the concern here.
04:00:32 So then we have a compromise.
04:00:35 I think.
04:00:35 >>HARRY COHEN: Could be I go ahead and make a motion now?
04:00:44 Be to have our legal department bring back on September 22nd
04:00:47 at our next regular council meeting an hybrid between
04:00:53 options 2 and 3 for our first reading consideration.
04:00:58 I don't think that it requires any more detail than that.
04:01:04 >> Second.
04:01:05 >>MARY MULHERN: For the folks with the cameras, you mate
04:01:11 want to explain what that is.
04:01:12 For the media.
04:01:13 >> Option 2 would be Sunday only.
04:01:15 >>HARRY COHEN: I would like to make a motion to ask the
04:01:18 legal department to be bring back an ordinance than
04:01:21 basically combines what we have been referring to as option
04:01:25 2, which is a Sunday-only, allowing for street solicitation
04:01:31 on Sunday only, to combine that with option 3, which is a
04:01:37 specific exemption for newspapers and purely political
04:01:41 speech and leafletting, that the combination of those two
04:01:46 things would address all of the concerns including --
04:01:49 including charitable organizations' ability to solicit, that
04:01:54 have been expressed at today's meeting.
04:01:56 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Second.
04:01:57 >>MARY MULHERN: Motion made by council -- question on the
04:02:02 >>FRANK REDDICK: So, in sees essence, one day a week,
04:02:06 Sunday, where you have solicitation on the street.
04:02:11 Cohen cone you would be allowed on a Sunday to do anything
04:02:15 you are allowed to do now, sell newspapers and solicit for
04:02:20 On the other six days of the weak, you would be able to sell
04:02:23 newspapers and to engage in purely political speech.
04:02:26 >>FRANK REDDICK: So the people out there with signs, will
04:02:30 they be allowed on Sunday?
04:02:34 >>HARRY COHEN: Yes.
04:02:35 Well, somebody just holding a sign that wasn't interacting
04:02:38 with a car would be able to do it seven days a week,
04:02:40 wouldn't they?
04:02:41 >>FRANK REDDICK: I'm saying what people are doing now, if
04:02:44 they are asking for money.
04:02:46 >>JIM SHIMBERG: Correct, that would be allowed only on
04:02:49 Cohen cone only on Sunday.
04:02:50 >>MARY MULHERN: Mass made by Councilman Cohen, seconded by
04:02:53 Councilman Montelione.
04:02:55 All in favor?
04:02:57 Anyone opposed? Nay.
04:02:58 >>THE CLERK: Motion carried with Mulhern voting no and
04:03:05 Miranda absent.
04:03:06 >>MARY MULHERN: And the ordinance will come back on
04:03:12 September 22nd?
04:03:16 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Should that be brought back as unfinished
04:03:20 business or did you want that for ordinances for first
04:03:24 The question is where did you want to the appear on the
04:03:27 agenda? It will be for first reading consideration, but I'm
04:03:29 just curious as to where it would appear.
04:03:31 >>HARRY COHEN: Councilwoman Capin, I think, is concerned
04:03:35 that her item is not -- was not enunciated as part of that
04:03:40 Did legal understand that to be part of the motion, or does
04:03:43 the motion need to be restated?
04:03:50 >>MARY MULHERN: Excuse me.
04:03:51 Councilwoman Capin.
04:03:56 >>JIM SHIMBERG: At second reading, as part of the adoption
04:03:59 of this ordinance, could you then make that motion if it's
04:04:05 ever struck down, if parts are ever struck down, to come
04:04:09 back to council.
04:04:10 That's what I think you are saying.
04:04:12 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Yes.
04:04:13 As opposed to now?
04:04:14 >>JIM SHIMBERG: You can make the motion now.
04:04:16 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I make the motion now.
04:04:17 >> Second.
04:04:18 >>JIM SHIMBERG: That will at the time you pass it on second
04:04:20 reading quo also consider that motion.
04:04:23 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Correct.
04:04:24 The motion is to have in writing that if any part of the
04:04:31 ordinance is struck that the sitting council will have to --
04:04:36 will have to address --
04:04:39 >>JIM SHIMBERG: That it will come back to council.
04:04:42 >>YVONNE CAPIN: It will come back to council and be
04:04:44 >>MARY MULHERN: Motion by Councilwoman Capin, seconded by
04:04:47 Councilwoman Montelione.
04:04:48 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Clarification.
04:04:51 The request to have it in writing is to be brought back for
04:04:55 second read?
04:04:57 >>JIM SHIMBERG: Well, she's asking for a motion.
04:05:00 It's not an ordinance.
04:05:00 It's a motion that would --
04:05:05 >> That's not an ordinance.
04:05:08 If council wishes to have it in writing, council could have
04:05:10 it as a resolution.
04:05:12 >>JIM SHIMBERG: Okay.
04:05:12 >>MARY MULHERN: Councilwoman Capin, I believe she wanted
04:05:15 that, this to be part of the ordinance.
04:05:20 Is that correct?
04:05:22 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Yes.
04:05:25 >>: That's why I didn't call on you because I thought it was
04:05:28 included in the ordinance.
04:05:34 >>JIM SHIMBERG: I thought we were talking about basically
04:05:36 having it as a council motion which could be in writing and
04:05:38 could be formal as you want it to be.
04:05:42 I mean, between we are talking about if in the future, if
04:05:45 it's challenged, if in the future a portion of it is struck
04:05:49 If the whole thing is struck down, it would not be relevant.
04:05:52 If only a portion of it is struck down, you want it to come
04:05:54 back to council for action but you can't force action.
04:06:00 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Portion of it or all of it?
04:06:01 It's a portion or all of it is struck down, that is what I
04:06:04 am looking at.
04:06:05 Then it would be -- I actually wanted to add that to the
04:06:12 >>JIM SHIMBERG: How about if we bring that back on the 22nd
04:06:14 within the appropriate way to do that along with first
04:06:21 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I'm willing to do that.
04:06:23 >>MARY MULHERN: As part of the ordinance, or as its own
04:06:29 >>JIM SHIMBERG: Correct.
04:06:30 >>LISA MONTELIONE: I understood it to be a stand-alone
04:06:33 >> We would have two ordinances.
04:06:39 >>YVONNE CAPIN: State your motion.
04:06:41 >>YVONNE CAPIN: That was not the intention to begin with.
04:06:43 But then when legal came up, we decided that we would make
04:06:46 it a separate ordinance, is what I was looking at.
04:06:49 So the motion is to come back on the 22nd with an ordinance
04:06:54 to have in writing, should any part of this, of the
04:06:58 ordinance, the 1 and 2, to be struck down, or severability
04:07:05 that council would have to have address that.
04:07:11 >>MARY MULHERN: Mr. Shelby, do we need to --
04:07:16 >>JIM SHIMBERG: I think it could be put on council agenda
04:07:20 for consideration.
04:07:21 You can't force them to have been address it.
04:07:22 >>MARTIN SHELBY: Council, I have a concern that this is in
04:07:25 the form of an ordinance to be placed in the code of
04:07:27 I don't think that's an appropriate part of it.
04:07:30 One thing that may be a suggestion -- and I'm thinking
04:07:33 frankly off the cuff now -- the option, I believe, that Mr.
04:07:37 Shimberg had given this council can be in the form of a
04:07:41 Council can put it in writing which then becomes a
04:07:44 resolution which is then numbered and maintained by the
04:07:49 Perhaps the third option would be to put a clause in there
04:07:52 saying, if any portion of this shall be found
04:07:55 unconstitutional, the city attorney shall so inform City
04:07:59 Council, and perhaps that would just put that within the
04:08:02 ordinance that the city attorney would be then be on notice
04:08:05 to inform you, or whatever City Council sitting at the time,
04:08:08 if that is an issue.
04:08:10 That is just thinking off the cuff.
04:08:11 I think we would do that anyway.
04:08:17 >>YVONNE CAPIN: One thing is to be informed and one thing is
04:08:20 to address it.
04:08:21 If nothing is done, can't do that.
04:08:24 >> We can't force council to be a dress an issue.
04:08:27 We can't force you to address it.
04:08:29 You may decide not to do anything.
04:08:30 >>MARTIN SHELBY: If I can follow up.
04:08:33 Council sometimes is forced to do that by a sunset
04:08:36 provision, which wouldn't in effect be the same thing?
04:08:44 It has almost the same effect as you giving the judge a
04:08:51 >>JIM SHIMBERG: But if something sunsets, it doesn't force
04:08:53 them to put something else in place.
04:08:55 They mate just say we don't need that regulation anymore.
04:08:58 So there's nothing they can force council to be do anything.
04:09:02 We can bring it back to you for consideration, but if four
04:09:06 beds decide to do something they can't force you to do it.
04:09:12 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I would like it to have to come back to
04:09:15 That it comes back, and it is looked at, ignored, or --
04:09:24 >>JIM SHIMBERG: We are all saying we are going to bring it
04:09:26 We are just deciding to best way to do it.
04:09:30 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Exactly.
04:09:30 So think about it.
04:09:31 >>MARY MULHERN: Mr. Shimberg, I'm confused.
04:09:34 And Mr. Shelby, you have been here longer.
04:09:37 So -- or maybe Mrs. Kert can tell us.
04:09:41 But when council -- I asked this before, and I don't feel
04:09:45 like it got answered.
04:09:47 If we pass an ordinance and it becomes litigated and found
04:09:53 to be unconstitutional, doesn't it always -- are we informed
04:10:00 of that so that should we -- don't we need to be informed of
04:10:04 Don't we have to -- don't we have to change our code if our
04:10:08 code is struck down?
04:10:13 >>JIM SHIMBERG: The attorney would have obligation in my
04:10:15 opinion to inform you of that.
04:10:16 I don't know that it's written in your charter.
04:10:18 But it is the obligation.
04:10:20 City attorney to be bring that back to you.
04:10:22 >>MARY MULHERN: Just the normal process of law, right?
04:10:26 >>JIM SHIMBERG: I think she's asking for more than that.
04:10:28 Because as I said we do that anyway.
04:10:30 If something is declared unconstitutional, if one of your
04:10:33 codes is we are going to bring that back to you anyway, at a
04:10:36 minimum just to let you know, but if we want to have that be
04:10:39 required, in this particular case, we can put of that in.
04:10:43 And again, if you would just let us work with Mr. Shelby and
04:10:48 Mrs. Kert and figure out the best way to ensure that that
04:10:51 I understand you don't want to just trust the fact that it's
04:10:54 the practice of this city attorney to do that, but we can
04:10:57 figure out a way to put it in writing, where council would
04:11:02 be comfortable, and if you are not you don't have to pass it
04:11:04 on the 22nd.
04:11:08 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I would very much appreciate that.
04:11:09 Because I think we could be here all night trying to figure
04:11:12 out --
04:11:12 >>MARY MULHERN: I think we are passed -- no, we are almost
04:11:16 We are getting there.
04:11:19 We already passed that motion.
04:11:28 We'll come back, and have some discussion, an explanation,
04:11:34 maybe some resolution.
04:11:36 >>THE CLERK: There has not been a vote on the motion by
04:11:42 Councilman Capin.
04:11:43 >>MARY MULHERN: You made a motion.
04:11:45 And I thought we voted it.
04:11:47 You didn't vote on the first motion we made?
04:11:52 >> We did vote on the first motion.
04:11:54 >>THE CLERK: You have not voted on the motion by --
04:11:58 >>MARY MULHERN: That's where we are.
04:11:59 That's we said we can do.
04:12:00 So we don't need to vote on your second motion.
04:12:03 >>YVONNE CAPIN: No.
04:12:04 That was -- they are concerned about the severability.
04:12:07 That will be looked into, also.
04:12:08 The severability.
04:12:13 Striking that part also.
04:12:16 >>JIM SHIMBERG: I thought we had gotten passed that in this
04:12:19 other way in the back.
04:12:22 We can look into it.
04:12:23 But right now we are not comfortable taking that out.
04:12:27 We thought we had worked it out by requiring it to come back
04:12:29 to council for consideration.
04:12:33 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Cap just for the record if there is nothing
04:12:35 done about this severability it will be a full ban.
04:12:37 So that everyone understands, if it is struck down by the
04:12:41 courts with this clause in here, it will revert -- it will
04:12:46 also be a full ban with the county, with no provision in
04:12:53 >>JIM SHIMBERG: Well, the confusing part is there's several
04:12:55 parts to this that we are talking about.
04:12:59 And if any one part of it is struck down, it doesn't create
04:13:03 a full ban.
04:13:04 The other parts are still in effect.
04:13:09 If the whole thing is struck down the county ordinance will
04:13:13 apply but anything short of that, you sterile have been the
04:13:15 And that is something that would come back to council for
04:13:19 And the if the court said it was unconstitutional you aren't
04:13:23 going to be able to just readopt it.
04:13:25 But there might be other options at that time that we can
04:13:28 bring to you but we can't speculate to that.
04:13:30 I'm just telling you, when council takes an action and
04:13:33 passes an ordinance, it usually has more than just, you
04:13:36 know, one part of it.
04:13:39 So that's why we are saying the severability provision
04:13:44 provides, if one part gets struck down the rest of it is
04:13:46 still in effect.
04:13:47 Council can then amend it.
04:13:49 So I think we are all on the same page.
04:13:53 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Then we can amend it to add the severability
04:13:56 at that point so we don't actually lose it and become a
04:13:58 total ban at that point.
04:14:01 >>JIM SHIMBERG: Correct.
04:14:04 >>YVONNE CAPIN: Is that what we are talking?
04:14:06 >>JIM SHIMBERG: She's saying she doesn't want to the become
04:14:07 a total ban without council having to have an opportunity to
04:14:10 consider the alternatives.
04:14:12 You don't want it to automatically become a total ban if
04:14:17 part of it is struck down.
04:14:20 >>YVONNE CAPIN: If part of it is struck down, at that point,
04:14:25 you can strike the severability so if any other part is
04:14:27 struck down, we don't wind up with a total ban.
04:14:32 Do you understand?
04:14:36 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Madam Chair, one thing.
04:14:38 Severability is there to protect us in terms of our
04:14:41 So we are talking about Sundays, or we are talking about
04:14:46 newspapers, we are talking about any other part.
04:14:48 The court may come back and say no more Sundays.
04:14:50 We still have our ban.
04:14:51 We can allow those other two parts of it.
04:14:54 So your motion, or your concern about severability, does
04:14:59 nothing, does nothing to bring it back to council.
04:15:04 Whether it's there or not.
04:15:05 It's going to come back to us in the normal course as a
04:15:11 litigant in the court of law.
04:15:12 The city attorney has an obligation as our attorney and as
04:15:18 his client, to come back to us and say, listen, you passed
04:15:21 an ordinance that of the four parts you had, one of them did
04:15:25 not pass, and it did not pass Constitutional muster, and
04:15:28 because of that, it has to come back to you to either, A,
04:15:32 find a way that it fits in Constitutional muster, or B,
04:15:36 eliminate it altogether and not take action at all.
04:15:39 So severabilities is for us to protect us as a council, to
04:15:43 make sure that the things that we pass stay in as law, as
04:15:49 So this discussion about removing severability does nothing
04:15:52 to help us, it does nothing for future councils, it does
04:15:55 nothing to bring us up.
04:15:57 I'm just following the argument from the attorney, following
04:16:00 from what I know of severability in terms of other types of
04:16:04 contracts, so we cannot force -- and it's bad law in my
04:16:09 mind, and I don't want to belabor this point -- to put in
04:16:13 there that it has to come back to downfall council.
04:16:16 It's always under our purview that we can take up anything
04:16:21 that concerns our ordinances.
04:16:23 That's why the severability argument, I think, it doesn't
04:16:27 really do anything.
04:16:28 Now that's my point.
04:16:32 >>JIM SHIMBERG: Give us a chance to be take a look at the
04:16:34 severability language.
04:16:35 We understand the concern that council member Capin has
04:16:37 raised, and we'll look at it and see when we bring it back.
04:16:43 In the meantime if there's a way to change that language a
04:16:45 little bit to provide additional protection we'll do that.
04:16:48 But I agree with what Councilman Suarez said.
04:16:51 It's there to protect you guys.
04:16:55 >>YVONNE CAPIN: It's there to protect us when we have the
04:16:57 combination of two. If it was just one of those, if it was
04:17:00 just one of those, which is what we have here is one of
04:17:04 each, then severability would cancel it.
04:17:09 I mean, having this on there would cancel whatever, because
04:17:14 we are changing it, that is understood.
04:17:17 Because we are changing it, it is a protection of the second
04:17:21 part that is there.
04:17:23 If only one part.
04:17:24 But the way, what we have here today, and what I was
04:17:27 bringing up, is that there was only -- one was number 3, one
04:17:33 was number 2, and severability that was on there would
04:17:37 have -- would have been a total ban.
04:17:44 So, therefore, I appreciate that and I will like for you to
04:17:48 please come forward.
04:17:50 >>MARY MULHERN: I am going to ask that we vote, because --
04:17:54 and this is because I understand what your concerns,
04:17:59 Councilwoman Capin, and support them.
04:18:01 I am going to ask that we vote, because apparently we never
04:18:03 voted when you made your orange motion.
04:18:09 Original motion.
04:18:10 >>MARTIN SHELBY: We did -- I'm sorry.
04:18:15 I'm sorry.
04:18:16 >>MARY MULHERN: I'm trying to run this meeting.
04:18:17 Councilwoman Capin.
04:18:18 If you would like to make a motion to ensure that the legal
04:18:22 department meets with you and comes back with some kind of
04:18:27 at least a recommendation to be you that might possibly be
04:18:32 an amendment to the motion, which will address your
04:18:36 concerns, which I think are very clear to us, and discuss
04:18:41 this with them in the meantime, if you would like to do
04:18:46 that, I think you started to do it.
04:18:49 I think we had a second.
04:18:51 I think we could just take a vote.
04:18:53 >>YVONNE CAPIN: I appreciate it.
04:18:54 I will Maersk that motion.
04:18:55 >>HARRY COHEN: Second.
04:18:56 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor?
04:18:57 Anyone opposed?
04:18:59 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Nay.
04:19:02 >>THE CLERK: Suarez voting no and Miranda absent.
04:19:12 >>MARY MULHERN: We do have one item still on our agenda.
04:19:17 (off microphone)
04:19:19 Mrs. Montelione, it was a motion that you made and I
04:19:28 >>LISA MONTELIONE: That was removed from the agenda.
04:19:35 Item 3?
04:19:36 >>MARY MULHERN: We never did that at the beginning of the
04:19:38 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Okay.
04:19:39 I move to remove item number 3 from today's agenda.
04:19:42 >>MIKE SUAREZ: Second.
04:19:44 >>MARY MULHERN: All in favor?
04:19:46 Anyone opposed? Normally we don't do new business.
04:19:49 But if anyone feels --
04:19:52 >>LISA MONTELIONE: I'm sorry, I do have two pieces of new
04:19:57 Or I can do it later.
04:19:59 I can do it later.
04:20:00 I'm sorry.
04:20:04 We can do it later.
04:20:05 >>MARY MULHERN: You will be here and you can do it later?
04:20:11 >>LISA MONTELIONE: Yes, I can do it later.
04:20:13 >>MARY MULHERN: Can we have a motion to receive and file?
04:20:16 >> Motion to receive and file.
04:20:17 >> Second.
04:20:18 >>: All in favor?
04:20:18 We are adjourned until 6:00.
04:20:29 (City Council special called workshop adjourned)
This file represents an unedited version of realtime
captioning which should neither be relied upon for complete
accuracy nor used as a verbatim transcript.
The original of this file was produced in all capital
letters and any variation thereto may be a result of third
party edits and software compatibility issues.
Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the
proceedings may need to hire a court reporter.